Supplementary Data for
One-pot synthesis of in-situ sulfur doped activated carbon as a
superior metal-free catalyst for adsorption and catalytic oxidation of
aqueous organics
Yaoping Guoa, b, Zequan Zenga*, Yongjin Liua, b, Zhanggen Huanga**, Yan Cuia, and Jieyang Yanga
aState Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, P.R. China
bUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 351 4048310; E-mail: [email protected] (Z. Zeng)**Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 351 4043727; E-mail: [email protected] (Z. Huang)
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Journal of Materials Chemistry A.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Scheme S1 Preparation of in-situ sulfur doped activated carbon (S-AC).
Fig. S1 XRD patterns of the S-AC samples.
Fig. S2 TG profiles of S-AC-600, -700, -800, and -900 samples.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted in a Netzsch thermal analyzer
with a heating rate of 5 °C min−1 in air. Fig. S2 shows that a minor mass loss below
200 °C was observed due to moisture desorption and then a moderate weight loss was
observed due to the removal of oxygen/sulfur-containing functional groups from 200
up to ~ 430 - ~ 490 °C. When the temperature was further raised, a sharp loss
occurred due to combustion in air, indicating the break down of carbon skeletons.
However, it is worthy noting that the S-AC-x samples completely burned out until the
temperature was raised to 560-590 °C, suggesting that the carbon samples exhibit
high thermal stability. In addition, it can be seen from Fig. S2 that there almost no
residue was remained after the combustion of carbon samples, demonstrating the high
purity of S-AC-x.
Fig. S3 SEM images of (a) S-AC-600, (b) S-AC-700, (c) S-AC-800, and (d) S-AC-900.
Fig. S4 (a) SEM image of S-AC-800, (b) O-, (c) C-, and (d) S-elemental mapping of the image.
Fig. S5 TGA curves of the precursors heated under an argon atmosphere.
The chemical transitions of sulfur-containing precursors to carbonaceous materials
is a complex issue, which undergo a series of carbonization/graphitization processes.
To shed light on the formation mechanism of activated carbon during pyrolysis,
thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was conducted by heating the precursors of PPS
and PPS/KOH (the weight ratio of PPS versus KOH is 1:2) under an argon
atmosphere. As illustrated by the curve of pure PPS (Fig. S5), almost no weight loss
can be observed below 410 °C due to the high thermal stability of PPS. After that,
there was a sharp weight loss between 410 to 570 °C, during which pyrolysis products
were formed. Further increased the pyrolysis temperature, the curve was slight decline
and then flat to 800 °C.
However, in the presence of KOH, the pyrolysis process of PPS was greatly
changed. As depicted, the dehydrogenation started at a lower temperature, and a
significant weight loss can be observed from ~120 up to 680 °C. It was suggested that
the addition of alkali metal compounds could facilitate the charring as well as
aromatization of the carbon and restricted the formation of tar.1 During this stage,
volatile species such as H2S, SO2, CO2, and CO were released, and hence porous
structure was generated. Besides, in the recomposition process, sulfur atom might be
incorporated into the carbon matrix for generating of thiophene sulfur (–C–S–C–), or
probably be oxidized for generating of oxidized S (–C–SOx–C–, x=2, 3, 4). After that,
persistent weight loss can be also observed at higher temperature (800 °C), which
may be attributed to the activation reaction between char and KOH.1-3 Firstly, KOH
was reduced by the carbon for producing metal potassium and simultaneously
releasing CO2 via reaction (1). Then the generated CO2 could react with the remaining
KOH to produce K2CO3 (Eq 2). In addition, KOH can also reacts with carbon though
Eq 3 to form metal potassium and K2CO3. Similarly, the formed K2CO3 was further
reduced by carbon via reaction (4). In the activation process, large quantities of
volatile species were further expulsed, which lead to the increase degree of
graphitization structure and the increase of surface area as well as pore volume.
However, excess activation would give rise to the collapse of the carbon skeleton
structure and then enlarge the pore size of the material.
(1)4𝐾𝑂𝐻+ 𝐶↔4𝐾+ 𝐶𝑂2 + 2𝐻2𝑂
(2)4𝐾𝑂𝐻+ 2𝐶𝑂2↔2𝐾2𝐶𝑂3 + 2𝐻2𝑂
(3)6𝐾𝑂𝐻+ 𝐶↔2𝐾+ 3𝐻2 + 2𝐾2𝐶𝑂3
(4)𝐾2𝐶𝑂3 + 2𝐶→2𝐾+ 3𝐶𝑂
Fig. S6 FTIR spectra of S-AC-600, -700, -800, and -900, respectively.
Fig. S6 displays FTIR spectra of the S-AC samples. It can be seen that several
characteristic peaks can be observed on the spectra. The peaks at 1720 cm−1, 1573
cm−1 and 1400 cm−1 can be assigned to C=O, C=C, and –COOH groups,
respectively.4 The bands located around 1130 cm−1 and 830 cm−1 indicate the presence
of oxidized sulfur, which can be assigned to O=S=O and C-S-O, respectively. In
addition, the weak peak at 620 cm−1 is characteristic of C–S stretching vibration in
thiophene sulfur. 5
Table S1. Elemental compositions and pHPZC of the carbon samples
Elemental composition (wt. %)Sample C H O S N pHPZC
S-AC-600 66.62 2.61 19.39 10.85 0.53 1.3
S-AC-700 78.54 1.52 11.81 7.57 0.56 1.5
S-AC-800 88.60 1.35 5.42 4.05 0.58 4.6
S-AC-900 86.63 1.09 6.37 5.31 0.60 2.0
Fig. S7 The high resolution XPS C 1s spectra of (a) S-AC-600, (b) S-AC-700, (c) S-AC-800, and
(d) S-AC-900.
Fig. S8 Adsorption of PCP on the reference carbon samples. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 80 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.1 g L−1, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S9 N2 sorption isotherms, and SBET of the reference samples.
Fig. S10 Fitting of pseudo-second order kinetic model for PCP adsorption on S-AC at different
PCP concentration. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.05 g L−1,
and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S11 Fitting of (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin adsorption isotherms of PCP on
S-AC at 25 °C. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.05 g L−1, and
temperature = 25 °C.
Table S2. Isotherm constants for the adsorption of PCP on different carbon samples at 25 °C.
Langmuir𝐶𝑒𝑞𝑒=𝐶𝑒𝑞𝑚
+1
𝑞𝑚𝐾𝐿
Freundlich
𝑙𝑛𝑞𝑒= 𝑙𝑛𝐾𝐹+1𝑛𝑙𝑛𝐶𝑒
Temkin
𝑞𝑒=𝑅𝑇𝑏𝑇𝑙𝑛𝐾𝑇𝐶𝑒
Sample
qm
mg g-1
KL
L mg-1
rL2 n KF
L g-1
rF2 bT
kJ mol-1
KT
L g-1
rT2
S-AC-600 292 0.08 0.9893 2.91 61.57 0.9750 39.05 0.78 0.9763
S-AC-700 385 0.05 0.9875 2.27 51.39 0.9813 27.11 0.43 0.9777
S-AC-800 526 0.08 0.9975 2.65 99.72 0.9927 21.75 0.80 0.9992
S-AC-900 417 0.06 0.9837 2.25 56.74 0.9319 24.99 0.46 0.9581
AC 88 0.67 0.9986 14.56 69.23 0.7975 89.59 0.87 0.7322
ACS-800 481 0.06 0.9841 2.36 73.63 0.9687 21.96 0.54 0.9693
SDAC-800 394 0.14 0.9973 3.92 93.81 0.9050 26.77 0.62 0.9322
Fig. S12 The kinetic data for PCP adsorption on (a) AC, (b) ACS-800, and (c) SDAC-800 at
different PCP concentration. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg L−1, catalyst =
0.05 g L−1, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S13 Fitting of pseudo-second order kinetic model for PCP adsorption on (a) AC, (b) ACS-
800, and (c) SDAC-800 at different PCP concentration. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 20, 30, 40,
50, 60 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.05 g L−1, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S14 Fitting of (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin adsorption isotherms of PCP on
AC, ACS-800, and SDAC-800 at 25 °C. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg L−1,
catalyst = 0.05 g L−1, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S15 The kinetic data for (a) PE adsorption, and (b) DCP adsorption on S-AC-800 at different
initial concentration; and fitting of pseudo-second order kinetic model for (c) PE adsorption, and
(d) DCP adsorption on S-AC-800 under different initial concentration. Reaction conditions: [PE]0,
and [DCP]0 = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.05 g L−1, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S16 Fitting of (a) Langmuir, (b) Freundlich, and (c) Temkin adsorption isotherms of PE and
DCP on S-AC-800 at 25 °C. Reaction conditions: [PE]0 and [DCP]0 = 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg L−1,
catalyst = 0.05 g L−1, and temperature = 25 °C.
Table S3. Isotherm constants for the adsorption of PE and DCP on S-AC-800 at 25 °C.
Langmuir𝐶𝑒𝑞𝑒=𝐶𝑒𝑞𝑚
+1
𝑞𝑚𝐾𝐿
Freundlich
𝑙𝑛𝑞𝑒= 𝑙𝑛𝐾𝐹+1𝑛𝑙𝑛𝐶𝑒
Temkin
𝑞𝑒=𝑅𝑇𝑏𝑇𝑙𝑛𝐾𝑇𝐶𝑒
Phenol
qm
mg g-1
KL
L mg-1
rL2 n KF
L g-1
rF2 bT
kJ mol-1
KT
L g-1
rT2
PE 295 0.03 0.9967 2.91 25.39 0.9870 34.56 0.27 0.9763
DCP 813 0.24 0.9992 2.65 278.99 0.9827 16.83 4.45 0.9772
Fig. S17 (a) Identification of aromatic intermediates produced in S-AC-800 with PS after a (a) 20
min, and (b) 170 min reaction, and standard intermediates tests of (c) benzoquinone, (d) 4-
chlororesorcinol, (e) 4-chlorocatechol and (f) p-chlorophenol.
Fig. S18 Removal of PCP on the reference carbon samples. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 80 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.1 g L−1, [PS] = 15 mM, and temperature = 25 °C.
Table S4. Surface chemistry information of the carbons.
Sample S levelat.%
–C–S–C–at.%
–C–SOx–C–at.%
sp2at.%
C=Oat.%
O=C–O at.%
ID/IG
S-AC-600 3.04 1.12 1.92 45.36 6.64 5.57 1.01
S-AC-700 1.93 0.82 1.11 48.51 8.51 5.45 1.09
S-AC-800 1.18 0.77 0.41 52.41 12.10 6.52 1.12
S-AC-900 1.57 0.85 0.72 51.74 10.47 6.06 1.21
Fig. S19 Effects of ethanol on PCP degradation in ZVI/PS system. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 =
80 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.1 g L−1, [PS] = 15 mM, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S20 Effect of S-AC-800 dosage on PCP removal. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 80 mg L−1,
catalyst = 0.01, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1 and 0.125 g L−1, [PS] = 15 mM, and temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S21 Effect of initial PCP concentration on PCP removal in the S-AC-800/PS system.
Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 60, 80, and 100 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.1 g L−1, [PS] = 15 mM, and
temperature = 25 °C.
Fig. S20 and Fig. S21 show the effects of catalyst dosage and initial PCP
concentration on PCP adsorption and oxidation in the S-AC-800 system. Results
show that PCP removal significantly increased with the increase of catalyst dosage,
while a reverse trend was observed at an elevated initial PCP concentration due to the
limited active sites and the insufficient PS concentration.
Fig. S22 Effect of reaction temperature on PCP removal and estimation of activation energy (inset)
in S-AC-800/PS system. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 80 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.1 g L−1, [PS] = 15
mM, and temperature = 25, 45, and 55 °C.
Fig. S23 Effects of reaction temperature on PCP removal and estimation of activation energy
(inset) with (a) rGO/PS, (b) AC/PS, (c) ACS-800/PS, and (d) SDAC-800/PS. Reaction conditions:
[PCP]0 = 80 mg L−1, catalyst = 0.1 g L−1, [PS] = 15 mM, and temperature = 25, 45, and 55 °C.
Fig. S24 Stability and reusability of S-AC-800. Reaction conditions: [PCP]0 = 80 mg L−1, catalyst
= 0.1 g L−1, [PS] = 15 mM, and temperature = 25 °C.
Table S5. Textural properties of S-AC-800 before and after use.
SampleSBET
m2 g-1
Smicro
m2 g-1
Vp
cm3 g-1
Vmicro
cm3 g-1
Average pore size
nm
S-AC-800 2777 1816 1.45 0.76 2.09
S-AC-800 after 1st run 1332 779 0.81 0.33 2.44
Regenerated S-AC-800 after 1st run 1825 1203 1.08 0.50 2.36
Fig. S25 (a) N2 sorption isotherms, and (b) pore size distributions of S-AC-800 before and after
use.
Fig. S26 The high resolution XPS S 2p spectra of S-AC-800 before and after use.
References
1. J. Hayashi, A. Kazehaya, K. Muroyama, A.P. Watkinson, Carbon, 2000, 38, 1873-1878.
2. M. Molina-Sabio, F. Rodrı́guez-Reinoso, Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp,2004, 241, 15-25.
3. M.A. Lillo-Ro´denas, D. Cazorla-Amoro´s, A. Linares-Solano, Carbon, 2003, 41, 267-275.
4. S. Liu, W. Peng, H. Sun and S. Wang, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 766-771.5. M. Tammer, G. Sokrates: Infrared and Raman characteristic group frequencies: tables and
charts ed., Wiley, Chichester, 2004.