+ All Categories
Home > Documents > OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY

OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY

Date post: 06-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: votruc
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
2
1199 many of them could give histories of previous slight attacks of most varied kinds. In this way Dr. Pruen collected 18 or 20 symptoms or groups of symptoms. In his opinion, more than three-fourths of the classical strokes have these symptoms as a prelude once or twice repeated. Dr. Pruen quoted the description of a first stroke from Dr. Samuel Gee’s " Clinical Aphorisms," which says : "The first thing you observe is that his speech is indistinct in consequence of defective articulation. He complains of a feeling of numbness in the right arm and leg, especially in the hand; and, on further examination, you discover that he is suffering from a slight hemiplegia on the right pide, affecting arm, leg, and face." " Dr. Pruen said that his own observations led him to believe that this stroke was probably not the first from which the particular patient suffered, but that it was more likely to have been the second and might have been the third. In Aescribing the symptoms which in his opinion constitute slight strokes Dr. Pruen premised that the patient is over 50 years old ; the attack is a unique experience as far as the patient is aware; the attack comes on with absolute suddenness ; and that the symptoms disappear very slowly but with a steady progress. The symptoms he had observed were: (1) Pins and needles in the arm and leg simultaneously ; (2) stumbling with obviously no cause; (3) giddiness; (4) nausea ; (5) palpitation ; (6) faintness ; (7) sudden weak- ness ; (8) confusion of ideas ; (9) change of character ; (10) headache; (11) sleepiness ; (12) feeling of dead- ness in the abdomen ; (13) paresis of one vocal cord; (14) wasting; (15) dysphagia ; (16) odd feeling. Fre- quently there was a combination of one or more of these symptoms, but in almost every case one symptom predominated. Dr. Pruen had been much struck with the large part the vagus (and presumably the sympathetic) plays in the condition of a patient who has had a stroke. He considered that degeneration of the vascular system and some local increase of tension were the probable accompaniments, if not the determining causes, of slight strokes; and he thought that the vascular changes were of a more insidious nature than those usually associated with strokes. The causes which above all others seemed to produce them were mental ones, either sudden shock or prolonged worry. Dr. Pruen, summing up his paper, said that slight strokes almost always preceded ordinary ones, that slight strokes were always followed by ordinary ones, that the nervous implication in strokes was always more widespread than was generally recognised, that the pre- disposing causes of strokes were not the gross lesions generally associated with them, and that molecular, rather than molar, movement was the determining factor. Dr. J. W. CARR said that the practical outcome of the paper was the help it afforded not only in recognising the symptoms of slight strokes and the dangers which they implied but also in taking precautions to ward off any future attacks. He commented on the difficulties in diagnosing cerebral haemorrhage and thrombosis. Dr. F. PARKES WEBER, alluding to the dilatation of the bladder and constipation referred to by Dr. Pruen as due to some dulling of sensibility, suggested that in some cases in elderly persons it was due rather to dulling of muscular sensibility than to dulling of the sensitiveness of mucous membrane. Dr. MICHAEL G. FOSTER described instances in which transient aphasia with partial paresis had occurred in parturient women. Dr. ROBERT HuTCHiso?.1 declared that the paper was valuable because it was based on the experience in general practice bv a man who saw a great number of elderly patients, and the members of the section would like to hear more papers of the kind. He referred to the transient hemi- plegia which may take place in the course of migraine. After Dr. PRUEN had replied the meeting came to an end. PATHOLOGICAL SECTION. President’s Opening Rema’1’ks.-Eaepe’1’imental Production ,f Appe2,tdic?.tis by Intra2e7aos 1nocJulation tif a Diplùoooous. -8arooma-producing M01lse Ua’1’o’inoma.-M1wi-oo,rmine Staining Method.-Uaroinoma of the Ute’1’1IS in a Rabbit. A MEETING of this section was held on Oct. 17th, Dr. R. T. HEWLETT, the President, being in the chair. The PRESIDENT, in the course of his Opening Remarks, said that on looking back over the progress of pathology during the last 20 years he was more and more struck with the wide range of knowledge required if the pathologist was to follow, even in outline, the output of pathological work. Reference was made to the importance of chemical and physical applications in biology and patho- logy. As regarded physical factors, he referred to Professor D’Arcy Thompson’s address at the British Association on the influence of physical forces in moulding the form of living organisms. The similarity of organic forms and those which physical forces were competent to produce had revived the idea of the possibility of spontaneous generation, and the work of Burke, Leduc, and others suggested that this problem, which had been worked at persistently by Bastian for so many years, could not be dismissed so contemptuously as formerly, and was worthy of critical work in order to elucidate it. Reference was made to the value and limita- tions of biometrical methods in experimental work, and, finally, the President pointed out the advantage which the society offered to those who contributed papers-viz., speedy publication. Dr. F. J. POYNTON and Dr. ALEXANDER PAINE read a paper entitled " A Further Contribution to the Study of Rheumatism, the Experimental Production of Appendicitis by the Intravenous Inoculation of the Diplococcus," which is published in full in this issue of THE LANCET, p. 1189. Mr. S. G. SHATTOCK and Dr. L. S. DUDGEON communicated the result of an experiment made with a Sarcoma-producing Mouse Carcinoma. The observations of Ehrlich and Apolant, that certain mouse carcinomata on being grafted into a, further series of mice were replaced by sarcomatous forma- tions, had been amply confirmed by Dr. B. R. G. Russell. The theoretical difficulty of explaining such a result on the assump--- tion that the epithelial cells of the grafted carcinoma furnish the cells of the sarcoma was so insuperable that the only way of evading it would be to regard the grafted tumour as an endothelioma in place of a proper carcinoma. The trans- formation of epithelial cells into connective tissue was a phenomenon unknown, at least after the conclusion of embryonic development, whereas the same transformation of endothelium, seeing that the latter tissue was of mesoblastic source, did not present the same difficulty ; the fibroblasts produced in the organisation of an intravascular thrombus were derived from the proliferated endothelium of the vessel. The apparent transformation, however, offered no histo- logical anomaly, for the simple reason that the process was one not of transformation but of substitution ; the sarco- matous growth arose from the connective tissue of the host. The experiment of the authors consisted in the repeated subcutaneous insertion of the particular tumour worked at by Dr. Russell, but after the cells had been rapidly killed by drying the pulp in the layers at 370 C. In the group of cases, six mice received four subcutaneous injections of the dried material after it had been re-made into a pulp by moistening it with salt solution. The injections were made weekly in the same region. No growth of any kind ensued. The experiments showed that for the incitement of the sarcomatous growth in the host, the action of the living carcinoma cells was necessary, and that the access to thi- circumjacent tissue of the materials extractable from the dead cells was not sufficient. Mr. P. P. COLE gave a demonstration illustrating the use and value of Muci-carmine as a Staining Reagent. He showed that the results obtained with this stain were constant and accurate, provided the stain was made properly. He described the method of making the stain and advocated as a fixative a saturated solution of perchloride of mercury with the addition of 5 per cent. of glacial acetic acid. He referred to the adoption of this stain by Mr. W. Sampson Handley in the- investigation of cancer of the large bowel, and indicated that the merest traces of mucus were picked out with the utmost accuracy, leaving other tissues unstained. Dr. A. LEITCH read a paper on Carcinoma of the Uterus in a Rabbit. OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY. I-residential Address.-He’l’eddaTY Cataract.-Heredatary Night-blindness -Exhabitzon uf Cases and Specimen. A MEETING of this society was held on Oct. 19th, Mr. J. BOWRING LAWFORD, the President, being in the chair. After the formal presentation of vol. xxxi. of the Transac- tions the PRESIDENT delivered his Introductory Address.
Transcript
Page 1: OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY

1199

many of them could give histories of previous slight attacksof most varied kinds. In this way Dr. Pruen collected18 or 20 symptoms or groups of symptoms. In his opinion,more than three-fourths of the classical strokes havethese symptoms as a prelude once or twice repeated.Dr. Pruen quoted the description of a first stroke fromDr. Samuel Gee’s " Clinical Aphorisms," which says : "Thefirst thing you observe is that his speech is indistinct inconsequence of defective articulation. He complains ofa feeling of numbness in the right arm and leg, especiallyin the hand; and, on further examination, you discoverthat he is suffering from a slight hemiplegia on the rightpide, affecting arm, leg, and face."

" Dr. Pruen said thathis own observations led him to believe that this stroke was

probably not the first from which the particular patientsuffered, but that it was more likely to have been the secondand might have been the third. In Aescribing the symptomswhich in his opinion constitute slight strokes Dr. Pruen

premised that the patient is over 50 years old ; the attackis a unique experience as far as the patient is aware;the attack comes on with absolute suddenness ; andthat the symptoms disappear very slowly but with a

steady progress. The symptoms he had observed were:

(1) Pins and needles in the arm and leg simultaneously ;(2) stumbling with obviously no cause; (3) giddiness;(4) nausea ; (5) palpitation ; (6) faintness ; (7) sudden weak-ness ; (8) confusion of ideas ; (9) change of character ;(10) headache; (11) sleepiness ; (12) feeling of dead-ness in the abdomen ; (13) paresis of one vocal cord;(14) wasting; (15) dysphagia ; (16) odd feeling. Fre-

quently there was a combination of one or more ofthese symptoms, but in almost every case one symptompredominated. Dr. Pruen had been much struck withthe large part the vagus (and presumably the sympathetic)plays in the condition of a patient who has had a

stroke. He considered that degeneration of the vascular

system and some local increase of tension were the

probable accompaniments, if not the determining causes,of slight strokes; and he thought that the vascular

changes were of a more insidious nature than those usuallyassociated with strokes. The causes which above all othersseemed to produce them were mental ones, either suddenshock or prolonged worry. Dr. Pruen, summing up his paper,said that slight strokes almost always preceded ordinary ones,that slight strokes were always followed by ordinary ones,that the nervous implication in strokes was always morewidespread than was generally recognised, that the pre-disposing causes of strokes were not the gross lesions

generally associated with them, and that molecular, ratherthan molar, movement was the determining factor.

Dr. J. W. CARR said that the practical outcome of thepaper was the help it afforded not only in recognising thesymptoms of slight strokes and the dangers which theyimplied but also in taking precautions to ward off anyfuture attacks. He commented on the difficulties in

diagnosing cerebral haemorrhage and thrombosis.Dr. F. PARKES WEBER, alluding to the dilatation of the

bladder and constipation referred to by Dr. Pruen as due tosome dulling of sensibility, suggested that in some cases inelderly persons it was due rather to dulling of muscularsensibility than to dulling of the sensitiveness of mucousmembrane.

Dr. MICHAEL G. FOSTER described instances in whichtransient aphasia with partial paresis had occurred inparturient women.

Dr. ROBERT HuTCHiso?.1 declared that the paper wasvaluable because it was based on the experience in generalpractice bv a man who saw a great number of elderlypatients, and the members of the section would like to hearmore papers of the kind. He referred to the transient hemi-plegia which may take place in the course of migraine.

After Dr. PRUEN had replied the meeting came to an end.

PATHOLOGICAL SECTION.

President’s Opening Rema’1’ks.-Eaepe’1’imental Production ,fAppe2,tdic?.tis by Intra2e7aos 1nocJulation tif a Diplùoooous.-8arooma-producing M01lse Ua’1’o’inoma.-M1wi-oo,rmine

Staining Method.-Uaroinoma of the Ute’1’1IS in a Rabbit.

A MEETING of this section was held on Oct. 17th, Dr.R. T. HEWLETT, the President, being in the chair.The PRESIDENT, in the course of his Opening Remarks, said

that on looking back over the progress of pathology

during the last 20 years he was more and more struckwith the wide range of knowledge required if the

pathologist was to follow, even in outline, the output ofpathological work. Reference was made to the importanceof chemical and physical applications in biology and patho-logy. As regarded physical factors, he referred to ProfessorD’Arcy Thompson’s address at the British Association on theinfluence of physical forces in moulding the form of livingorganisms. The similarity of organic forms and those whichphysical forces were competent to produce had revived theidea of the possibility of spontaneous generation, and thework of Burke, Leduc, and others suggested that this

problem, which had been worked at persistently by Bastianfor so many years, could not be dismissed so contemptuouslyas formerly, and was worthy of critical work in order toelucidate it. Reference was made to the value and limita-tions of biometrical methods in experimental work, and,finally, the President pointed out the advantage which thesociety offered to those who contributed papers-viz., speedypublication.

Dr. F. J. POYNTON and Dr. ALEXANDER PAINE read apaper entitled " A Further Contribution to the Study ofRheumatism, the Experimental Production of Appendicitisby the Intravenous Inoculation of the Diplococcus," which ispublished in full in this issue of THE LANCET, p. 1189.

Mr. S. G. SHATTOCK and Dr. L. S. DUDGEON communicatedthe result of an experiment made with a Sarcoma-producingMouse Carcinoma. The observations of Ehrlich and Apolant,that certain mouse carcinomata on being grafted into a,further series of mice were replaced by sarcomatous forma-tions, had been amply confirmed by Dr. B. R. G. Russell. Thetheoretical difficulty of explaining such a result on the assump---tion that the epithelial cells of the grafted carcinoma furnishthe cells of the sarcoma was so insuperable that the onlyway of evading it would be to regard the grafted tumour as anendothelioma in place of a proper carcinoma. The trans-formation of epithelial cells into connective tissue was a

phenomenon unknown, at least after the conclusion ofembryonic development, whereas the same transformationof endothelium, seeing that the latter tissue was of mesoblasticsource, did not present the same difficulty ; the fibroblastsproduced in the organisation of an intravascular thrombuswere derived from the proliferated endothelium of the vessel.The apparent transformation, however, offered no histo-

logical anomaly, for the simple reason that the process wasone not of transformation but of substitution ; the sarco-

matous growth arose from the connective tissue of the host.The experiment of the authors consisted in the repeatedsubcutaneous insertion of the particular tumour worked atby Dr. Russell, but after the cells had been rapidly killedby drying the pulp in the layers at 370 C. In the group ofcases, six mice received four subcutaneous injections of thedried material after it had been re-made into a pulp bymoistening it with salt solution. The injections were madeweekly in the same region. No growth of any kind ensued.The experiments showed that for the incitement of thesarcomatous growth in the host, the action of the livingcarcinoma cells was necessary, and that the access to thi-

circumjacent tissue of the materials extractable from the deadcells was not sufficient.

Mr. P. P. COLE gave a demonstration illustrating the useand value of Muci-carmine as a Staining Reagent. He showedthat the results obtained with this stain were constant andaccurate, provided the stain was made properly. He describedthe method of making the stain and advocated as a fixative asaturated solution of perchloride of mercury with the additionof 5 per cent. of glacial acetic acid. He referred to the

adoption of this stain by Mr. W. Sampson Handley in the-investigation of cancer of the large bowel, and indicated thatthe merest traces of mucus were picked out with the utmostaccuracy, leaving other tissues unstained.

Dr. A. LEITCH read a paper on Carcinoma of the Uterus ina Rabbit.

OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY.

I-residential Address.-He’l’eddaTY Cataract.-HeredataryNight-blindness -Exhabitzon uf Cases and Specimen.

A MEETING of this society was held on Oct. 19th, Mr.J. BOWRING LAWFORD, the President, being in the chair.

After the formal presentation of vol. xxxi. of the Transac-tions the PRESIDENT delivered his Introductory Address.

Page 2: OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY

1200

’Having referred to his election as President in a few gracefuland grateful phrases Mr. Lawford proceeded to deal, in con-siderable detail, with the subject of vaccine therapy, passingin review the work of many continental and Britishinvestigators, and then went on to refer to their bearing onthe treatment of eye diseases. He concluded by a referenceto immunity, active and passive, and to the prospect ofsuccess in eye diseases. Sympathetically appreciativeallusion was made by the President to the decease of Dr.Hughlings Jackson, one of the original members of the

society, and to the fact that he was one of the earliestphysicians to insist on the importance of ophthalmoscopicexamination in diseases of the nervous system.

Mr. E. NETTLESHIP communicated, for Dr. J. S. Mansonof Warrington, a paper entitled "A Case of HereditaryCataract." It was a case of hereditary lamellar cataract

occurring in four consecutive generations, affecting 13persons (6 males and 7 females), and transmitted in all casesby females who were themselves affected. Three membersof the pedigree, in three different generations, had a con-genital deformity of the little fingers, which appeared tohave been independent of the cataract, for only one indi- ’,vidual showed both the digital and lenticular abnormality.

Mr. NETTLESHIP also contributed a paper entitled, "ANew Case of Hereditary Night-blindness." It was the formwithout opthalmoscopic changes, in which the abnormalitywas associated with myopia, and descended, as in colour-blindness and several other conditions, through females them-selves normal. Twenty cases bad been discovered in thisextensive genealogy. Photometric records and field measure-ments of several were recorded; in one there was a partialring scotoma. Several members of the pedigree were myopicwithout being night-blind, and several (some of them night-blind, others with normal sight) were mentally affected.There was only one consanguineous marriage in the entirepedigree.The following cases and specimen were shownMr. GEORGE COATS : Two cases showing a Small Superficial

Opaque Ring in the Cornea. Mr. Coats thought that if it wasnot a deposit it must be a congenital opacity. He had seenanother case of the same kind.

Mr. N. BISHOP HARMAN demonstrated a new Photometer forschool doctors, a portable and simple instrument whereby anexact knowledge of the amount of light existing in schools,without relying on the uncertainties of personal estimates,could be obtained in candle-power-that of the ordinaryLondon sperm candle.

Lieutenant-Colonel L. J. PISANI, I.M.S. : A case of Cystof the Iris.Major W. T. MOULD, R.A.M.C.: A case of Vaccine Pastule

in the Eyelid.Mr. R. A. GREEVES : A case of Tumour of the Ciliary Body in

which there was recurrence after removal. Neither causticsnor the application of C02 checked its growth.

Dr. D. G. GREENFIELD : A case of Unilateral Optic Neuritisin a case of Disseminated Sc’lerosis.

DEVON AND EXETER MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY.

Eolampsia.A MEETING of this society was held on Oct. 13th, Mr.

J. M. ACKLAND, the President, being in the chair.Dr. G. P. D. HAWKER showed a case of Extensive Osteoma

of the Tibia in a middle-aged woman. He then read a paper,illustrated by a case recently under his care, to open a dis-cussion on Eclampsia. The patient was a primipara, aged 25years, whose family history showed an unstable nervousequilibrium, the woman herself being distinctly of thenervous type. There was a history of scanty urine,with a heavy deposit of "sand." During the latermonths her legs had swelled. In the course of the last fewweeks she had had what the neighbours called hysterical fits,in which there was no history of loss of consciousness or ofbiting of the tongue. She had cried out freely during theattacks and had never fallen. When summoned at11.30 A.M. on Jan. 27th Dr. Hawker found labour pains,which had been established for 12 hours, now vigorous andrecurring every five minutes. The os was the size of half a..crown and the presentation and pains appeared to be normal.The general condition was satisfactory. A little urine had

been passed at 9 A. M. Fifteen grains of chloral were given.At 3 P. M. Dr. Hawker found the os fully dilated and the painsstrong ; ten minutes later there was a general convulsive fitlasting three minutes. Chloroform was at once adminis-tered and a catheter passed, bloody urine being drawn off.A colleague was sent for and instrumental delivery carriedout. Immediately the forceps was applied a fit occurred,followed by two others at rapid intervals. With the thirdfit delivery was effected, but with considerable lacerationof the perineum. The placenta gave little trouble, buttwo or three smaller fits occurred during the repair ofthe perineum. One drachm of bromide was given by therectum. At 7.30 P. M. she had had seven fits in all and wasunconscious, with widely dilated pupils and arched back.Slight fits continued up to 10 P.m., when the bromide wasrepeated. At 11.30 P. m, the pulse was 124 and the tempera-ture 1030 F. During the night 11 fits occurred in spite ofbromide every three hours and a hot pack. On the 28th a pintof urine was drawn off by catheter and found to be of specificgravity 1020 and to contain one-third albumin. The fits nowlessened both in frequency and violence, but she was stillunconscious. The knee-jerks were exaggerated and Babinski’ssign was present. On the 29th there had been no fitssince 9 P.M. the previous night, and albumin had fallento one-tenth. Blood cells and casts were present. Onthe 30th she was semi-conscious ; she had passed urine. Thediscs, examined on this day, were found to be blurred, butno haemorrhages were noted. The plantar reflex was nowflexor. On the 31st there was incontinence of urine and fasces.Bromides were stopped. Further progress was gradual, butin the main satisfactory. She was quite rational on Feb. 3rd,and there was no incontinence. The temperature, never highsave on the day of delivery, now reached the normal. Theurine still contained a trace of albumin, but no casts werenoted. On March 10th she was convalescent and allowedto get up. The urine was found free of albumin and nocasts were noted. Dr. Hawker emphasised the fact that thispatient had had symptoms for two months before delivery,but as there had been concomitant indigestion she hadsubsisted mainly on a milk diet, and thus unconsciously hadadopted the right diet for her condition. The fits whichoccurred prior to labour appeared to have been reallyhysterical. The actual eclamptic convulsions did notoccur until labour was well advanced, and were wellcontrolled by chloroform. He attributed recovery in thiscase to the good nursing, the constant alteration ofposition, thereby avoiding pulmonary cedema, and to thediminution of toxins by copious saline enemata and

frequent hot packs. A notable point was the absence ofalbumin or casts in the urine at the end of six months,Dr. Hawker felt somewhat at a loss for an explanationof the presence of Babinski’s sign on the second day.His hospital experience had not impressed him with thevalue of morphine in the treatment, more especially inrelation to pulmonary complications—œdema of the lungbeing the rule where this drug had been employed. Thenumber of 1its seemed to have no bearing on prognosis, buthe considered that the inception of convulsions after labourwas a bad sign. Dr. Hawker referred briefly to thepathology of eclampsia and mentioned Albec’s and Lotze’sinjection experiments with liquor amnii,! Animals so in-jected showed the same changes in the liver as patientsdying from the disorder. Normal liquor used as a controlwas innocuous. Disintegration of the placenta would bethe primary cause. As regards treatment, a recent meetingof the Obstetrical Section of the Royal Society of Medicineseemed to be in favour of emptying the uterus. Out of 36cases reported by Dr. W. Alexander,2 of Liverpool WorkhouseHospital 7 cases were hastened, with 2 deaths, a mortality of28. 5 per cent.; whereas 29 were delivered naturally, with amortality of 9-i.e., 31 per cent. Dr. Alexander’s treatmentconsisted of saline purgatives, diuretics, and saline injec-tions, together with nerve sedatives such as bromide, chloral,and morphia. He also cited Dr. Hastings Tweedy’s report of30 cases of eclampsia at the Rotunda Hospital. 3

Dr. A. W. F. SAYRES mentioned a severe case he hadrecently met with in his own practice. Dilatation, version,and instrumental delivery were performed, but the subse-quent condition became one of deepening coma. Dr. Sayres

1 British Journal of Obstetrics, August, 1905.2 THE LANCET, Jan. 28th, 1911, p. 217.3 THE LANCET, Feb. 4th, 1911, p. 306.


Recommended