+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

Date post: 10-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: vishalsingh7514
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 113

Transcript
  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    1/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    2/113

    Organizationalbehavior

    Definition-

    Is a field of study that investigate the impact that individuals,group, and structure have on behavior within organizations forthe purpose of applying such knowledge toward improving an

    organization's effectiveness.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    3/113

    The nature of organizationalbehavior

    p The field of organizational behaviorattempts to understand human behaviorin organizational settings , the

    organization itself, and the individual organization interface. These areas at atime , a complete understanding oforaganizational behavior requires

    knowledge of all three areas.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    4/113

    environment

    Human behavior in organizational settings

    The individual-organization interface

    The organization

    environment

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    5/113

    Definition ( Intuition / systematicstudy)

    p Systematic study Looking at relationships ,attempting to attribute cause and

    effects,and drawing conclusion based on scientific evidenceIntituitionA gut feeling not necessarily supported by research. Feeling about

    what, why, how to do.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    6/113

    Disciplines contributing forOBp Psychology- is the science that seeks to measure, explain,and sometimes change the

    behavior of humans and other animals .

    p Sociology- the study of people in relation to their fellow human beings.

    p Social psychology blends concepts from both psychology and sociology. It focuseson the influence of people on one another.

    p Anthropology- is the study of societies to learn about human beings and their

    activitiesp Political science-study the behavior of individuals and groups within political

    environment.

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    7/113

    psychology

    Learning,motivation,personality,Emotions,perception,training,

    Leadership effectiveness,Job satisfaction,individual decision

    making,

    performance appraisal,attitudemeasurementEmployee selection,work design,work

    stress

    sociology

    Gr.dynamic,work team,communicationPower,conflict,intercrop behavior

    Formal org theoryOrg technologyOrg changeOrg culture

    Social;psychology

    Behavior change,attitudechange

    Communication,go processesGroup decision making

    anthropology

    Comparative valueComparative attitude

    Cross-cultural analysis

    Org cultureOrg envy

    Politicalscience

    ConflictInterior politics

    power

    Behavioralscience

    contributionUnit ofanalysis

    individual

    group

    Organizationsystem

    Study ofOrganization

    behavior

    output

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    8/113

    The Historical roots

    p The scientific era

    p Classical organization theory

    p The hawthorne studies

    p The human relation movement

    p Toward organizational Behavior Thevalue of people

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    9/113

    Challengesp Responding to globalization

    p Managing workforce diversity

    p Improving quality and productivity

    p Responding to coming labor shortage

    p Improving customer service

    p Improving people skillp Empowering people

    p Stimulating innovation and changes

    p Coping with temporaries

    p Improving ethical behavior

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    10/113

    OB MODELThe model is based on three level of analysis in OB

    p Organization level

    p Group level

    p Individual level

    The model depends on two variablesp Dependent

    p independent

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    11/113

    VariablesDependent variables

    p Productivity- implies a concern for both effectiveness and efficiency

    p Absenteeism as the failure to report for work

    p Turnover- is the voluntary and involuntary permanent withdrawal from anorganization.

    p Organization citizenship behavior (cob)

    p Job satisfactionThe Independent variables

    p Individual level variables

    p Group level variables

    p Organization systems level variables

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    12/113

    Four modelsAutocratic Custodial Supportive Collegial

    Basic ofmodel

    Power Economicresources

    Leadership Partnership

    Managerialorientation

    Authority Money Support Team work

    Employeeorientation

    Obedience Security andbenefits

    Jobperformance

    Responsiblebehavior

    EmployeepsychologicalResults

    Dependence onboss

    Dependenceonorganization

    Participation Self discipline

    EmployeeneedsMeet

    Subsistence security Status andrecognition

    Selfactualization

    Performanceresult

    minimum Passivecooperation

    Awakeneddrives

    Moderateenthusiasm

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    13/113

    The S-O-B-C model

    p Stimulas

    p Organism

    p Behavior

    p Consequences

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    14/113

    AttitudesAttitudes are evaluating statements either favorable or

    unfavorable concerning objects ,people or events . Theyreflects how one feels about something .

    Attitude are not the same as values but the two are interrelated .The three components of attitudes

    p Cognitive components

    p Affective component

    p Behavioral component

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    15/113

    Types of attitude

    p Job satisfaction

    p Job involvement

    p Organizational commitment

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    16/113

    Cognitive Dissonance theory

    Leon Festinger proposed the theory of cognitive dissonance.This theory explains the linkage between attitude and

    behaviorDissonance means an inconsistency .

    Cognitive dissonance refers to any incompatibility that anindividual might perceive between two or more of his or herattitudes, or between his or her behavior and attitude .

    The desire to reduce dissonance would be determined byp Importancep Influencep reward

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    17/113

    Job satisfaction

    p Satisfaction and productivity

    p Satisfaction and absenteeism

    p Satisfaction and turn over

    p Job satisfaction and OCB( Org citizenshipbehavior

    p Job satisfaction and customer satisfaction

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    18/113

    dissatisfaction

    p Exit

    p Voice

    p Loyalty

    p neglect

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    19/113

    Transactional Analysis

    p Transactional analysis ( TA) is a system for theanalysis of personal and interpersonalcommunication and behavior. It was definedand evolved by Dr. Erik Berne, whose thesiswas that there existed in everyone three quiteclearly distinguishable sets of attitudes and

    behaviors. He called them ego states.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    20/113

    Ego States

    p Parent

    p Adult

    p Child Configurations

    ComplementaryCrossedUlterior

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    21/113

    Johari windowp Feedback

    Open or publicBlind

    Hidden or private Undiscovered or unknown

    Known to self Unknown to self

    Known to others

    UnknownTo others

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    22/113

    personality

    Personality is the dynamic organizationwithin the individual of thosepsychophysical systems that determine hisunique adjustments to his environment .

    Personality is the sum total of ways in whichan individual reacts to and interacts withothers .

    Its defined in terms of measurable traits .

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    23/113

    Personality determinants

    p Heredity

    p Environment

    p Situation

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    24/113

    Personality traitsp There are various characteristic that describe an individuals

    behavior .popular characteristic includesshy,aggressive,submissive,lazy,ambitious.loyal and timid.These characteristic when exhibited in large number ofsituation are called personality traits .

    p Researchers have long believed that these traits could help inemployee selection,matching people to jobs ,and in guidingcareer development decision

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    25/113

    The Myers Briggs Type indicator

    p Mostly used personality assesmentinstrument in the world

    p Depending on the result of the test

    p Individual are classifie on terms as( E orI),(S or N), (T or F), (J or P),

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    26/113

    MBTIThese terms are defined as

    p Extroverted vs Introverted Extroverte dindividual are outgoing ,sociable ,and assertive. Introverts are quite and shy

    p Sensing vs Intuitive sensing types are practicle and preferroutine and order. They focus on details . Intituitives rely on

    unconscious processes and look at the big picture.p Thinking vs feeling Thinking types use reason and logic to

    handle problems. Feeling types rely on their personal valuesand emotions.

    p Judging vs perceiving- judging types want control and prefer their

    world to be ordered and structured . Perceiving types areflexible and spontaneous .

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    27/113

    MBITp Intj-are visionariesThey usually have original minds and great drive of their own ideas

    and purpose . They are characterized as skeptical , critical ,independent , determined and often stubborn.

    p Estj are organizer .they are realistic , logical analytical and decisive and have a natural

    head for business or mechanics .. They like to organize and runthe activities .

    Exercise

    http://smb//tmp/svk9g.tmp/Training%20Instruments-9-21st%20batch.ppthttp://smb//tmp/svk9g.tmp/Training%20Instruments-9-21st%20batch.ppt
  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    28/113

    Major personality Attributesinfluencing OB

    p Locus of control-

    1.Internals belives that they can controltheir destinies

    2.Externals who see their lives as beigncontrolled by outside forces,

    A persons perception of sources of his or

    her fate is termed locus of control.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    29/113

    personality Attributes

    Machiavellianism- named after NiccoloMachiavelli.

    p .an individual high in machiavellianism ispragmatic , maintains emotional distance and

    belives that end can justify meansp High mach florish

    1.When they interacts face to face with othersrather than indirectly

    2.When the situation has a minimum numbers ofrules and regulations

    3.When emotional involvement with detailsirrelevent to winning distracts low machs.

    4.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    30/113

    personality Attributes

    p Self esteem is directly related toexpectation for success

    p Self monitoring refers to an individual,s

    ability to adjust his or her behavior toexternal , situational factors

    p Risk taker

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    31/113

    Types of personality

    p Type a

    p Type b

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    32/113

    Type Ap Are always moving ,walking and eating rapidly

    p Feel impatient with the rate at which most events take place

    p Strives to think or do two or more thing at once

    p Cannot cope with leisure time

    p Are obsessed with numbers , measurable their success in terms ofhow many or how much of everything they acquire.

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    33/113

    Type B

    p Never suffer from a sense of time urgencywith its accompanying impatience

    p Feels no need to display or discuss either

    their achievements or accomplishmentsunless such exposure is demended bythe situation

    p Play for fun and relxation , rather than toexhibit their superiority at any cost

    p Can relax without guilt

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    34/113

    Proactive personality

    p Identify opportunities , show initiatives ,take action and persevere untillmeanigful change occurs. They create

    positive change in their environment ,regardless or even in spite of constraintsor obstacles.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    35/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    36/113

    Motivation

    p Motivation is the set of forces that leadspeople to behave in particular ways

    p P=M+A+E

    P= performanceM=MotivationA=ability

    E= environment

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    37/113

    The motivation process

    Needs

    (deprivation) Drives( deprivation

    with directions )

    Goals( reductionof drives )

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    38/113

    Characteristics of motives

    p Similar motives may be manifestedthrough different behaviors.

    p Different motives may be expressed

    through similar behavior .p Motives may appear in disguised form.

    p Any single act of behavior may express

    several motives

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    39/113

    Classification of motives

    p Primary

    p Secondary

    p Power

    p Achievement

    p Affiliation

    p Security

    p Status

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    40/113

    Morale

    p According to Dale S.Beach Morale is thetotal satisfaction a person derives fromhis job, his work group, his boss, his

    organization and his environment.p It is defined as a composite of feelings and

    sentiments that contribute to generalfeelings of satisfaction.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    41/113

    Concept of morale

    p Fundamental psychological concept

    p Multidimensional concept

    p Group phenomenon

    p Contagious

    p Moral is different than motivation

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    42/113

    Factors influencing moralep External

    p Internal

    1.Goals of an organization

    2.Structure3.Nature of task

    4.Managerial philosophy

    5.Working conditions

    6.Groups

    Relation ship of morale and

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    43/113

    Relation ship of morale andproductivity

    p High productivity high morale

    p Low productivity high morale

    p High productivity low morale

    p Low productivity low morale

    The motivational frame

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    44/113

    The motivational framework

    Experiencedneed

    deficiencies

    Search forWays to

    Satisfy needs

    Choice ofgoal directed

    behaviors

    EnactmentOf Behavioral

    Choice(performance)

    ExperiencedRewards or

    Punishments

    ReassessmentOf need

    deficiencies

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    45/113

    Needs and motives

    p Primary needs are the basic physicalrequirements necessary to sustain life .

    p Secondary needs are requirements learned

    from the environment and culture inwhich the person lives.p A motive is a persons reason for choosing

    one behavior from among several

    choices.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    46/113

    Theories

    p Maslows Hierarchy of needs

    p Herzbergs dual structure Theory

    p Alderfers ERG Theory

    p McClellands theory of Needs

    p The job characteristic model

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    47/113

    Maslows heirarchy of needs

    Selfactualization

    Esteem needs

    Love needs

    Safety needs

    Psychologic

    al needs

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    48/113

    Herzbergs theoryp Motivational

    p Recognition

    p Responsibility

    p

    Possibility of growthp Advancement

    p Achievements

    p Work itself

    p Hygiene factors

    p Company policies

    p Technical supervision

    p

    Salaryp Interpersonal relation

    p Job security

    p Personal life

    p Working conditionp Status

    p

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    49/113

    Group dynamics

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    50/113

    group

    p A group is defined as two or moreindividuals , interacting andinterdependent, who have come

    together to achieve particular objectives.p Groups can be either formal or informal

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    51/113

    Types of groupsp Formal group- those defined by the organizations

    structure, with designated work assignment establishingtask .

    p Informal group- are alliances that are neither formallystructured nor organizationally determined

    p

    A command group is determined by organizational chart.p Task group also organizationally determined, representthose working together to complete a job task.

    p Interest group people who may or may not be aligned intocommon command or task groups may affiliate to attaina specific objectives with which each is concerned.

    p

    Friendship group-based on common characteristics .

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    52/113

    An Alternative Modelp Groups direction

    p 1st inertia

    p A transition at the end of this phase

    p A transition initiates a lot of changes

    p A second phase of inertia follows the transitionp The groups last meeting is characterized by markedly

    accelerated activity

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    53/113

    Why formation of groups

    p Security

    p Status

    p Self-esteem

    p Affiliation

    p Powerp Goal achievement

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    54/113

    Stages of group development

    p The five stage model

    p An alternative model

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    55/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    56/113

    Group structure

    p Roles

    p Norms

    p Status

    p Group sizep And the degree of group cohesiveness.

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    57/113

    Roles

    p Role identity

    p Role perception

    p Role expectation

    p Role conflictp

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    58/113

    Normsp Hawthorn studies

    p Common clauses of norms

    1. Performance norms

    2. Appearance norms

    3. Social arrangements norms4. Allocation of resources norms

    p Conformity

    p Deviant workplace behavior

    p

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    59/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    60/113

    size

    p Groups made up of odd numbers do apretty good job of exercising the bestelements of both small and large groups.

    p

    Having an odd number of memberseliminates the possibility of ties whenvotes are taken

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    61/113

    Cohesivenessp That is the degree to which member are attracted or attached to

    each other and are motivated to stay in then group.

    p To encourage group cohesiveness

    1. Make the group smaller

    2. Encourage agreement with group goals

    3. Increase the time member spend together

    4. Increase the status of the group and the perceived difficulty ofattaining membership in the group

    5. Stimulate competition with other groups

    6. Give rewards to the group rather than to individual member

    7. Physically isolate the group.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    62/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    63/113

    Group decision making techniques

    p Brainstorming

    p The nominal group techniques

    p Electronic meeting

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    64/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    65/113

    Group vs Team

    Groups team

    Share information toward goalachievement

    Collective performance toward goalachievement

    Synergy neutral Positive synergy

    Individual accountability Individual and mutual

    Skills required are random and varied complementary

    No need of opportunity to engage incollective work

    Specific task orientated

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    66/113

    Types of teams

    p Problem solving teams

    p Self managed work teams

    p Cross- functional teams

    p Virtual teams

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    67/113

    Problem solving teamsp Composed of 5-12 membersp Members from Same department

    p Few hours or each week interval

    p Discuss improving quality , efficiency, and the work

    environment.p They rarely have authority to unilaterally implement any of

    their suggested action.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    68/113

    Self managed work team

    p Group of 10 15p Members perform highly related or interdependent jobs and take

    on many of the responsibilities of their former supervisors.

    p members evaluate each others performance

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    69/113

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    70/113

    Virtual teams

    p Use computer technology to tie togetherphysically dispersed members in orderto achieve common goal.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    71/113

    Creating effective teams

    Context:Adequate resources

    Leadership andstructure

    Climate of trustPerformance

    evaluationand reward system

    Process:Common purposeSpecific goalsTeam efficacyConflict levelsSocial loafing

    Team effectiveness

    Composition:Abilities of

    membersPersonality

    Allocating rolesDiversity

    Size of teamsMember flexibilityMember preferences

    Work design:Autonomy

    Skill varietyTask identity

    Task significance

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    72/113

    Key roles of teams

    Advisor linker creator

    maintainer

    producer organizer

    assessor

    Teams

    promoter

    controller

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    73/113

    Effectiveness of teams

    p Effectiveness teams need to work together andtake collective responsibility to completesignificant task.

    p Use of work design characteristics ( skill variety,

    Task identity, task significance0p These work design characteristic motivates

    because they increase members sense ofresponsibility and ownership over the work andbecause they make the work more interesting

    to perform.p Common purposep Specific goals

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    74/113

    Effectiveness of teams

    p Team efficacy

    p Conflict level

    p Social loafing

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    75/113

    conflict

    A process that begins when one partyperceives that another party has negatively

    affected , something that the first party

    cares about.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    76/113

    Different views

    p Traditional view of conflict the belief thatall conflict is harmful and must beavoided.

    p Human relation view-the belief thatconflict is a natural and inevitableoutcome in any group.

    p Interactionist view- the belief that a

    conflict is not only a positive force in agroup but that it is absolutely necessaryfor a group to perform effectively.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    77/113

    Types of conflictFunctional and dysfunctionalp Functional conflict- conflict that supports the

    goals of the group and improves itsperformance.

    p Dysfunctional conflict-conflict that hinders groupperformance

    Types p Task conflict- conflict over contents and goal of

    the workp Relationship conflict- conflict based oninterpersonal relationships.

    p Process conflict- conflict over how work getsdone.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    78/113

    The conflict process

    Antecedentcondition

    CommunicationStructure

    Personal variables

    Perceivedconflict

    Feltconflict

    Conflict

    handlingIntentions

    CompetingCollaboratingCompromising

    Avoiding

    Accommodating

    Overtconflictparty;sbehavoirOthersbehavior

    IncreasedGroup

    performance

    DecreasedGroup

    Performance

    Stage 1Potential

    Opposition

    Stage 2Cognition

    &personalization

    Stage 3Intention

    s

    Stage

    4behav

    ior

    Stage

    5outcomes

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    79/113

    Levels of conflicts

    p Intra Individual Conflict

    a)Goal Conflict

    b)Role Conflict

    p Interpersonal conflict- Johari Window

    Open self Hidden self

    Blind self Undiscovered self

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    80/113

    Levels

    p Inter groupp Structural Hierarchical Conflict

    FunctionalLine-staffFormal Informal

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    81/113

    Management of conflict

    p Conflict is inevitablep It can harm achievement

    p It can promote innovation of development

    of new ideas.p It can be managed.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    82/113

    Conflict resolution

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    83/113

    techniquesp Problem solvingp Superordinate goals

    p Expansion of resources

    p Avoidance

    p

    Smoothingp Compromise

    p Authoritative command

    p Altering the human variables

    p Altering the structural variables

    Conflict stimulation

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    84/113

    techniques

    p Communicationp Bringing in outsider

    p Restructuring the organization

    p Appointing a devils advocatep

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    85/113

    Negotiationp Negotiation permeates the interaction of almost every one

    in groups and organization

    p It can be defined as a process in which two orr more

    parties exchange goods or services and attempt to agreeon the exchange rate for them

    p Term negotiation and bargaining interchangeably

    p

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    86/113

    Bargaining strategies

    p Distributive bargainingp Integrative Bargaining

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    87/113

    The negotiation process

    Preparation andplanning

    Definition ofGround rules

    Clarification and

    justificationBargaining andProblem solving

    Closure and

    implementation

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    88/113

    Issues in negotiation

    p The role of personality traits in negotiationp Gender difference in negotiations

    p cultural differences in negotiation

    p Third party negotiations

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    89/113

    Leadership

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    90/113

    Leadership vs management

    p Operational vs Conceptualp Followers vs forced

    p Internal driven vs external driven

    p Formal vs informalp

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    91/113

    Leadershipp Sources of power-

    Personal abilities

    p Focus- Vision andpurpose

    p Approach-Transformational

    p

    Process-Inspirationp Emphasis- Collectivity

    p Futurity-Proactive

    p Type-Formal and

    informal

    Management

    p Authority delegates

    p Operating results

    p

    Transactionalp Control

    p Individualism

    p Reactive

    p Formal

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    92/113

    Trait theory

    p Focuses on personal characteristic of the leaderp Seven traits ambition and energy, the desired to lead,

    honesty, and integrity , self confidence ,intelligence,high self monitoring, and job relevantknowledge

    p

    The big five model-extroversion, agreeableness,conscientiousness, emotional stability, opennessto experience.

    p Two conclusions 1. Traits can predict leadership

    2. Traits do better job at predicting the emergence ofleaders and the appearance of leadership than inactually distinguishing between effective andineffective leaders.

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    93/113

    Limitation

    p Generalization of traitsp Applicability of traits

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    94/113

    Behavioral theories

    Ohio state studies these researcher sought toidentify independent dimension. They are calledinitiating structure and consideration.

    p Initiating structure refers to the extent to whicha leader is likely to define and structure his or

    her role and those of subordinates in thesearch for goal attainment.

    p Consideration- the extent to which a leader islikely to have job relationships characterized bymutual trust , respect for subordinates ideas

    and regards for their feeling.University of Michigan studies- employee

    oriented and production orientedp Michigan researchers favored the employee

    oriented , related to higher group productivity

    and job satisfaction.

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    95/113

    Managerial grid

    p Blake and Moutonp Also called as leadership grid, - based on the style of concern for

    people and concern for production

    p Nine possible positions along each axis, creating 81 differentpositions in which the leaders style may fall.

    p

    1,9- country club managementp 99- team management

    p 5,5- middle-0f-the Road management

    p 1,1- impoverished management

    p 9,1- Authority- compliance management

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    96/113

    high

    low

    low

    high

    Concern for results

    Concer

    n

    forpeople

    1,9 9,9

    1,1 9,1

    5,5

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    97/113

    Situational theory

    p Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard have developed aleadership model called situational leadershiptheory ( SLT)

    p This is a contingency theory that focuses on the

    followers.p The term readiness is given importance.

    p The emphasis on the followers in leadershipeffectiveness reflects the reality that it is the

    followers who accept or reject the leader.Regardless of what the leader does,effectiveness depends on the actions of his orher followers.

    S

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    98/113

    SLT

    p Identify four specific leader behavior- from highlydirective to highly laissez-fair.

    p Follower is unable and unwilling to do a task leader needs to give clear and specific

    directionsp Follower unable and willing leader needs todisplay high task orientation to compensate forthe followers lack of ability and highrelationship orientation.

    p Follower able and unwilling- leader supportiveand participative style

    p Follower able and willing leader doesnt has todo much

    p

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    99/113

    S

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    100/113

    Stress

    p Stress is a dynamic condition in which anindividual is confronted with anopportunity , constraints or demandrelated to what he or she desires and forwhich the outcome is perceived to beboth uncertain and important.

    p Stress is not necessarily bad in and of

    itself.p Stress is associated with constraints and

    demands

    P t ti l S f t

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    101/113

    Potential Source of stress

    p Environment factorsp Organizational factors

    p Individual factors s

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    102/113

    Model of stress

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    103/113

    Model of stress

    Environment factors Economic uncertaintyPolitical uncertainty

    Technological uncertainty

    Org factorsTask and role demandInterpersonal demand

    Org structureOrg leadership

    Org life stages

    Individual factorsFamily problems

    Economic problems

    Personality

    Individual differences-Perception

    Job experienceSocial support

    Belief in locus of control

    Self- efficacyhostility

    Experienced stressed

    Physiological symptomHeadaches

    High blood pressureHeart disease

    Psychological symptomAnxiety

    Depression

    Decrease in job satisfacti

    Behavioral SymptomsProductivityAbsenteeism

    turnover

    M i t

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    104/113

    Managing stress

    p Individual Approachp Organizational Approach

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    105/113

    ChangeManagement

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    106/113

    p Organizational change is a complexphenomenon.

    p There is a distinction between changing

    reality , which is a continuous process,and changing perception, which isessentially a sporadic process.

    p we need to become the driver of change

    rather than being nailed by themultiplicity of influence that a change ofexternal circumstances can wield.

    S ti l P

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    107/113

    Sequential Process

    p Initiationp Motivation

    p Diagnosis

    p Information collectionp Deliberation

    p Action proposal

    p Implementationp Stabilisation

    p

    M i R l

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    108/113

    Main Role

    p Corporate managementp Consultant(s)

    p Counterpart

    p Chief implementerp Implementation team

    p Task forces

    C t t

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    109/113

    Corporate management

    p Legitimizing functionp Energizing function

    p Communicating function

    p Gate-keeping function

    Consultant

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    110/113

    Consultant

    p Implanting functionp Transcending function

    p Function of generating alternatives

    p Process facilitating functionp Shock absorbing function

    p Resource sharing function

    p Resource building functionp Self-liquidating function

    Implementation Team

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    111/113

    Implementation Team

    p Collaboration building functionp Gate- keeping function

    p Reviewing function

    p Policy formulating function

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    112/113

    Sources of resistance andcoping Mechanisms

  • 8/8/2019 Org Behav- Univ- 1sem- 09

    113/113

    coping Mechanisms

    Sources of resistancep Perceived peripherality of

    change.

    p Perception of imposition.

    p

    Indifference of the topmanagement.

    p Vested interests

    p Complacency inertia

    p Fear of large scaledisturbance .

    p Fear of inadequate resources

    p Fear of obsolescence

    p Fear of loss of power

    Coping mechanismsp Participation in diagnosis

    p Participation andinvolvement.

    p Active support from thetop

    p Phasing of change

    p Support of resources

    p Development of skills

    p Role redefinition and re-orientation

    p Role clarity and definition


Recommended