+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Parameters of the Digital Divide

Parameters of the Digital Divide

Date post: 30-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: ina-carey
View: 18 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Parameters of the Digital Divide. Mack Shelley RISE, ELPS, Statistics, Iowa State University Lisa Thrane RISE, Iowa State University Stuart Shulman Environmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University. Prepared for Science and Society Seminar Series, September 30, 2003. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
41
Parameters of the Digital Divide Parameters of the Digital Divide Mack Shelley Mack Shelley RISE, ELPS, Statistics, Iowa State University RISE, ELPS, Statistics, Iowa State University Lisa Thrane Lisa Thrane RISE, Iowa State University RISE, Iowa State University Stuart Shulman Stuart Shulman Environmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University Environmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University Prepared for Science and Society Seminar Series, September Prepared for Science and Society Seminar Series, September 30, 2003 30, 2003
Transcript
Page 1: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Parameters of the Digital DivideParameters of the Digital Divide

Mack Shelley Mack Shelley RISE, ELPS, Statistics, Iowa State UniversityRISE, ELPS, Statistics, Iowa State University

Lisa ThraneLisa ThraneRISE, Iowa State UniversityRISE, Iowa State University

Stuart ShulmanStuart ShulmanEnvironmental Science and Policy Program, Drake UniversityEnvironmental Science and Policy Program, Drake University

Prepared for Science and Society Seminar Series, September 30, Prepared for Science and Society Seminar Series, September 30, 20032003

Page 2: Parameters of the Digital Divide

The Digital Citizenship The Digital Citizenship ProjectProject

An outgrowth of eRulemaking researchAn outgrowth of eRulemaking research Audiences raise digital divide questionsAudiences raise digital divide questions

Creates a Digital Citizenship courseCreates a Digital Citizenship course ENV/POLS 052ENV/POLS 052 covers the digital divide debate, covers the digital divide debate,

impact on politics, and Lessig’s impact on politics, and Lessig’s CodeCode Requires a 1-credit service-learning lab Requires a 1-credit service-learning lab

ENV/POLS 053ENV/POLS 053 teaches/enacts lesson plans focused teaches/enacts lesson plans focused on entry-level computer skillson entry-level computer skills

Student/community collaborationStudent/community collaboration Identify problems & solutionsIdentify problems & solutions

Service-learning & research design can clashService-learning & research design can clash Ex., Reciprocity and randomizationEx., Reciprocity and randomization

Page 3: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Service-Learning TheoryService-Learning Theory One useful definitionOne useful definition

Service-Learning is a method of teaching and Service-Learning is a method of teaching and learning which engages students in solving learning which engages students in solving problems and addressing issues in their school or problems and addressing issues in their school or greater community as part of a total educational greater community as part of a total educational program.program.

Motivation for serviceMotivation for service ““To teach is to learn twice”To teach is to learn twice”

– – Joseph JoubertJoseph Joubert

Learning to think like a researcherLearning to think like a researcher Participant observers Participant observers A critical role for classroom reflectionA critical role for classroom reflection

Page 4: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 5: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 6: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 7: Parameters of the Digital Divide

““Falling Through the Net”Falling Through the Net”

““raising the level of digital raising the level of digital inclusion … is a vitally inclusion … is a vitally important national goal … important national goal … Internet access is no longer Internet access is no longer just a luxury item”just a luxury item” US Department of CommerceUS Department of Commerce

Information literacy an Information literacy an increasingly critical increasingly critical component of citizenshipcomponent of citizenship eGov leaves many behindeGov leaves many behind

Page 8: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 9: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 10: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 11: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Drake students engaged inservice-learning with Polk Co. seniors

Page 12: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Senior Citizen ClienteleSenior Citizen Clientele

Survey (n=90) administered to suburban seniors in Des Moines

62% over 70; 85% White; 65% female 75% have computers at home 75% have computers at home Over 2/3 have limited computer skills Over 2/3 have limited computer skills 58% report no experience with the World Wide 58% report no experience with the World Wide

WebWeb 29% low skill 29% low skill 10% contact public officials via Internet 10% contact public officials via Internet Majority do not want elections held on the InternetMajority do not want elections held on the Internet 65% do not believe that the Internet should 65% do not believe that the Internet should

empower citizens to be politically involvedempower citizens to be politically involved

Page 13: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 14: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 15: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Source: CNN.COM Web Site

Page 16: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 17: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 18: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 19: Parameters of the Digital Divide
Page 20: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Student ReflectionStudent Reflection

““Before this class, I didn’t know what digital Before this class, I didn’t know what digital citizenship was. At the Social Security citizenship was. At the Social Security Administration, you can’t talk to someone Administration, you can’t talk to someone directly without going through technological directly without going through technological jumping jacks. I couldn’t imagine someone jumping jacks. I couldn’t imagine someone who was relatively poor, old, and uneducated who was relatively poor, old, and uneducated trying to find out what their income was. You trying to find out what their income was. You have to be technologically savvy to do these have to be technologically savvy to do these kinds of things. I had no knowledge of this kinds of things. I had no knowledge of this prior to class, and this affects millions of prior to class, and this affects millions of people in the US.people in the US.””

Page 21: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Student ReflectionStudent Reflection

““It is too much to expect people to become It is too much to expect people to become digital citizens right away. It is part of a digital citizens right away. It is part of a process . . . spending time with a Drake process . . . spending time with a Drake student or on their own. When you spend student or on their own. When you spend more time on the Internet, you realize you more time on the Internet, you realize you can look up any possible thing, or any small can look up any possible thing, or any small question you ever wondered about. Help question you ever wondered about. Help finding this information is important as far finding this information is important as far as digital citizenship. Clients are used to not as digital citizenship. Clients are used to not having everything at their fingertips, you having everything at their fingertips, you have to show them that they do.”have to show them that they do.”

Page 22: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Overview of ResearchOverview of Research

Two major research questionsTwo major research questions1) How do race and education 1) How do race and education influence attitudes toward influence attitudes toward information technology?information technology?2) What are the effects of these 2) What are the effects of these attitudes on digital government? attitudes on digital government?

Page 23: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Data & MethodsData & Methods

SampleSample Mail survey administered to randomly selected Mail survey administered to randomly selected

adults in a moderate-size Midwestern city in 2002adults in a moderate-size Midwestern city in 2002 Treatment GroupTreatment Group

Selected from a low-income urban populationSelected from a low-income urban population Received a brochure inviting them to attend free Received a brochure inviting them to attend free

computer classescomputer classes Remaining participants formed a control groupRemaining participants formed a control group Response rate was very lowResponse rate was very low

3% (n = 66) from treatment group, 6% (n = 101) 3% (n = 66) from treatment group, 6% (n = 101) from control groupfrom control group

Page 24: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Measures & AnalysisMeasures & Analysis

Survey instrument measuresSurvey instrument measures Desire for Computer SkillsDesire for Computer Skills Technological Information PowerTechnological Information Power Computer UseComputer Use Digital GovernmentDigital Government Computer Access EquityComputer Access Equity

Factor analysisFactor analysis Structural equation model (LISREL Structural equation model (LISREL

8.30)8.30)

Page 25: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Reduced ModelReduced Model-

+

++ +

-

+

++

Education

Race

Desire for Computer

Skills

Technological Information

Power

Digital Government

Computer Access Equity

Computer Use

Χ2 (11) = 12.61 (p = .35)

GFI = .98

AGFI = .94

NFI = .90

Page 26: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary FindingsPreliminary Findings

As education declines, desire for computer As education declines, desire for computer skills increasesskills increases

Individuals with higher levels of education are Individuals with higher levels of education are more likely to use computers at home and more likely to use computers at home and workwork

Non-whites are more likely to report Non-whites are more likely to report technological information key to empowermenttechnological information key to empowerment

Non-Whites show greater interest in learning Non-Whites show greater interest in learning computer skillscomputer skills

Non-Whites more likely to suggest that Non-Whites more likely to suggest that computers should be accessible to all citizenscomputers should be accessible to all citizens

Page 27: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary Findings Preliminary Findings (continued)(continued)

Interest in developing computer skills is Interest in developing computer skills is positively associated with digital citizenshippositively associated with digital citizenship

Viewing technology as a source of Viewing technology as a source of informational power is positively related to informational power is positively related to digital government digital government

Technological informational power increases Technological informational power increases beliefs in computer access equitybeliefs in computer access equity

The path model demonstrates some predictors The path model demonstrates some predictors may have an intervening effect on outcomesmay have an intervening effect on outcomes These indirect effects are marginalThese indirect effects are marginal

Page 28: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary Findings Preliminary Findings (continued)(continued)

An indirect effect was found between race and An indirect effect was found between race and computer access equity through technological computer access equity through technological information powerinformation power Direct effect accounted for 78% of the total effect Direct effect accounted for 78% of the total effect

Education decreased support for digital Education decreased support for digital government through desire for computer skills government through desire for computer skills

Effect of race on digital government influenced Effect of race on digital government influenced by technological information power by technological information power Less so through desire for computer skillsLess so through desire for computer skills

Page 29: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Conclusions to DateConclusions to Date

Community members, particularly in Community members, particularly in economically and racially vulnerable economically and racially vulnerable groups, lack basic computer skillsgroups, lack basic computer skills Educationally advantaged groups report Educationally advantaged groups report

greater use of computers in their daily livesgreater use of computers in their daily lives Citizens must have a baseline of ITL to Citizens must have a baseline of ITL to

take advantage of Internet accesstake advantage of Internet access Information technology appears to be widening Information technology appears to be widening

the gap between the IT literate and those the gap between the IT literate and those without basic navigational skillswithout basic navigational skills

Page 30: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Conclusions to Date Conclusions to Date (continued)(continued)

Non-Whites are significantly more likely to Non-Whites are significantly more likely to believe informational technology is a believe informational technology is a valuable source of powervaluable source of power Translates into a somewhat greater belief in Translates into a somewhat greater belief in

computer access equitycomputer access equity Non-Whites report significantly more Non-Whites report significantly more

desire than do Whites for equal access to desire than do Whites for equal access to computers and the Internetcomputers and the Internet

Positive attitudes toward technology, an Positive attitudes toward technology, an intervening variable, correlate with intervening variable, correlate with respondents being more likely to report a respondents being more likely to report a need to provide computers to the publicneed to provide computers to the public

Page 31: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Conclusions to Date Conclusions to Date (continued)(continued)

There is a direct linkage between a desire for There is a direct linkage between a desire for computer proficiency and digital citizenshipcomputer proficiency and digital citizenship Education only a minor influence on this outcome Education only a minor influence on this outcome

Potentially, service-learning is a well-suited Potentially, service-learning is a well-suited intervention to bridge the divide between intervention to bridge the divide between disenfranchised groups and digital citizenrydisenfranchised groups and digital citizenry Quasi-experimental assessments of the effects of Quasi-experimental assessments of the effects of

service learning interventions on ITL are underwayservice learning interventions on ITL are underway

Page 32: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Future ResearchFuture Research

National CATI Survey (3 states) by ISU’s National CATI Survey (3 states) by ISU’s Center for Survey Statistics and Center for Survey Statistics and MethodologyMethodology Colorado, Iowa, PennsylvaniaColorado, Iowa, Pennsylvania Larger sample sizeLarger sample size RandomizationRandomization Expanded and refined questionnaireExpanded and refined questionnaire More elaborate models possibleMore elaborate models possible

But, still a low response rateBut, still a low response rate

Page 33: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Overview of CATI National Overview of CATI National SurveySurvey

ColoradoColorado 157 respondents unweighted (31.3% response rate)157 respondents unweighted (31.3% response rate) 104 respondents weighted104 respondents weighted

IowaIowa 171 respondents unweighted (37.4% response rate)171 respondents unweighted (37.4% response rate) 71 respondents weighted71 respondents weighted

PennsylvaniaPennsylvania 150 respondents unweighted (26.7% response rate)150 respondents unweighted (26.7% response rate) 303 respondents weighted303 respondents weighted

Page 34: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Some Preliminary Results Some Preliminary Results from the CATI National from the CATI National

SurveySurvey How often do you vote in state and How often do you vote in state and

national elections?national elections? ““Always”Always”

61.4% for those with a home computer61.4% for those with a home computer 53.3% for those without a home computer53.3% for those without a home computer

““Never”Never” 8.0% for those with a home computer8.0% for those with a home computer 19.3% for those without a home computer19.3% for those without a home computer

Page 35: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

How often do you vote in local How often do you vote in local elections?elections? ““Always”Always”

40.4% for those with a home computer40.4% for those with a home computer 44.5% for those without a home computer44.5% for those without a home computer

““Never”Never” 12.5% for those with a home computer12.5% for those with a home computer 23.4% for those without a home computer23.4% for those without a home computer

Page 36: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

Extent of political participationExtent of political participation ““A great deal”A great deal”

3.2% for those with a home computer3.2% for those with a home computer 2.9% for those without a home computer2.9% for those without a home computer

““Not at all”Not at all” 25.5% for those with a home computer25.5% for those with a home computer 40.1% for those without a home computer40.1% for those without a home computer

Page 37: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

Email is a good way to contact officialsEmail is a good way to contact officials ““Strongly Agree”Strongly Agree”

19.6% of those using a computer at work19.6% of those using a computer at work 13.7% of those not using a computer at work13.7% of those not using a computer at work 17.3% of those who do not work17.3% of those who do not work

““Strongly Disagree”Strongly Disagree” 0% of those using a computer at work0% of those using a computer at work 1.8% of those not using a computer at work1.8% of those not using a computer at work 11.5% of those who do not work11.5% of those who do not work

Page 38: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

Email is a good way to contact officialsEmail is a good way to contact officials ““Strongly Agree”Strongly Agree”

19.5% of those with a home computer19.5% of those with a home computer 10.8% of those without a home computer10.8% of those without a home computer

““Strongly Disagree”Strongly Disagree” 1.2% of those with a home computer1.2% of those with a home computer 3.3% of those without a home computer3.3% of those without a home computer

Page 39: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

Computers should be made available to Computers should be made available to the general publicthe general public

““Strongly Agree”Strongly Agree” 48.7% of those using a computer at work48.7% of those using a computer at work 31.9% of those not using a computer at work31.9% of those not using a computer at work 38.9% of those who do not work38.9% of those who do not work

““Strongly Disagree”Strongly Disagree” 0.4% of those using a computer at work0.4% of those using a computer at work 0% of those not using a computer at work0% of those not using a computer at work 0% of those who do not work0% of those who do not work

Page 40: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

Computers should be made available Computers should be made available to the general publicto the general public

““Strongly Agree”Strongly Agree” 47.5% of those with a home computer47.5% of those with a home computer 24.6% of those without a home computer24.6% of those without a home computer

““Strongly Disagree”Strongly Disagree” 0.3% of those with a home computer0.3% of those with a home computer 0% of those without a home computer0% of those without a home computer

Page 41: Parameters of the Digital Divide

Preliminary CATI Survey Preliminary CATI Survey Results (continued)Results (continued)

Elections should be held on the InternetElections should be held on the Internet ““Strongly Agree”Strongly Agree”

5.3% of those using a computer at work5.3% of those using a computer at work 1.1% of those not using a computer at work1.1% of those not using a computer at work 3.8% of those who do not work3.8% of those who do not work

““Strongly Disagree”Strongly Disagree” 19.7% of those using a computer at work19.7% of those using a computer at work 20.7% of those not using a computer at work20.7% of those not using a computer at work 32.1% of those who do not work32.1% of those who do not work


Recommended