+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Parker-Hannifin Ball Bearing Assembly

Parker-Hannifin Ball Bearing Assembly

Date post: 16-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Nicholas Van Watermeulen Manufacturing Engineer Milayna Beadell Procurement Colin Brown Design Engineer Miguel Elizondo Project Manager Parker-Hannifin Ball Bearing Assembly Current State: The method shown requires the operator to dip the ring into a container of bearings, balance them, place it over the coupler, and spin the ring until ball bearings are in place. This requires a great deal of refills and inconveniences the operators with spillages. Mission Statement: Merit Engineering will work with Parker- Hannifin to simplify the current ball bearing installation procedure for their ¼” 60-series quick-connect hydraulic couplings by designing and installing a standardized semi-automated fixture to increase parts per hour, eliminate spilling, and reduce assembly complexity. Design Constraints: (1) There are two different types of ball bearings. (2) Current quality control methods must be integrated. (3) Must be a safe, reliable, and fail-proof design. (4) Ergonomics must be factored into design. (5) Needs to handle over 100 parts per hour, and (6) Budget of $5,000. Solution: Gravity Feeder The gravity feeder holds, contains, and dispenses ball bearings. Zero Gravity Arm The Zero Gravity Arm aids the rising and lowering action of the Gravity Feeder in its holder. It is an ergonomic way to lift the gravity feeder when it is full of ball bearings. Refill Station A refill station was created to simplify gravity feeder usage. The innovative design makes it easier for operators to quickly and consistently refill the gravity feeder without spilling ball bearings. Conclusion: The three components that have been implemented to the ¼” cell include: two Gravity Feeders, one Zero Gravity Arm, and two Refill Stations. All of the added components to the ¼” assembly cell help reduce the number of ball bearings spilled at the workstation and most importantly prevents the incorrect ball bearing types to be assembled in the incorrect coupler, while only spending $900 of the budget.
Transcript
Page 1: Parker-Hannifin Ball Bearing Assembly

Nicholas Van Watermeulen

Manufacturing Engineer

Milayna Beadell

Procurement

Colin Brown

Design Engineer

Miguel Elizondo

Project Manager

Parker-Hannifin Ball Bearing Assembly

Current State:The method shown requires the operatorto dip the ring into a container of bearings,balance them, place it over the coupler,and spin the ring untilball bearings are inplace. This requires agreat deal of refills andinconveniences theoperators with spillages.

Mission Statement: Merit Engineering will work with Parker-Hannifin to simplify the current ball bearinginstallation procedure for their ¼” 60-seriesquick-connect hydraulic couplings by designingand installing a standardized semi-automatedfixture to increase parts per hour, eliminatespilling, and reduce assembly complexity.

Design Constraints:(1) There are two different types of ballbearings. (2) Current quality control methodsmust be integrated. (3) Must be a safe, reliable,and fail-proof design. (4) Ergonomics must befactored into design. (5) Needs to handle over100 parts per hour, and (6) Budget of $5,000.

Solution: Gravity Feeder The gravity feeder holds,contains, and dispenses ballbearings.

Zero Gravity Arm The Zero Gravity Arm aids the rising and loweringaction of the Gravity Feeder in its holder. It is anergonomic way to lift the gravity feeder when it isfull of ball bearings.

Refill Station A refill station was created to simplifygravity feeder usage. The innovativedesign makes it easier for operators toquickly and consistently refill the gravityfeeder without spilling ball bearings.

Conclusion: The three components that have beenimplemented to the ¼” cell include: twoGravity Feeders, one Zero Gravity Arm,and two Refill Stations. All of the addedcomponents to the ¼” assembly cellhelp reduce the number of ball bearingsspilled at the workstation and mostimportantly prevents the incorrect ballbearing types to be assembled in theincorrect coupler, while only spending$900 of the budget.

Recommended