+ All Categories

Part 10

Date post: 17-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: willa
View: 33 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Part 10. Part 10 DANGERS POSED BY VALLEY SIDE JOINTS. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
14
Part 10 Part 10 Part 10 DANGERS DANGERS POSED BY POSED BY VALLEY SIDE VALLEY SIDE JOINTS JOINTS
Transcript
Page 1: Part 10

Part 10Part 10Part 10

DANGERS DANGERS POSED BY POSED BY

VALLEY SIDE VALLEY SIDE JOINTSJOINTS

Page 2: Part 10

• In 1905 and 1936 a cliff detached itself at Loen Lake, In 1905 and 1936 a cliff detached itself at Loen Lake, Norway, falling into the blocked fjord. In 1936 the Norway, falling into the blocked fjord. In 1936 the displacement wave carried across the fjord and destroyed displacement wave carried across the fjord and destroyed the adjacent settlement, killing 73 people. 70% of rock the adjacent settlement, killing 73 people. 70% of rock slides occur during first fall freeze or spring thaw. slides occur during first fall freeze or spring thaw.

The Loen Lake failures occurred along inclined valley-side joints

Page 3: Part 10

VALLEY SIDE VALLEY SIDE JOINTSJOINTS

• Valley side, sheet, and exfoliation joints all describe the same features

• When the valley side is excavated new joints form beneath the free surface, due to unloading

• This caused problems at Mammoth Pool dam site in California, shown here

• Karl Terzaghi recommended placing the embankment fill, then grouting the joints before reservoir filing

Page 4: Part 10

• Valley-side joints are particularly treacherous because they are usually inclined at close to 45-Ø/2 degrees from vertical (around 60 degrees), which offers the least shear resistance to slippage.

Page 5: Part 10

• Catastrophic rockfall typical of steeply inclined bluffs with out-of-plane discontinuities. This example is from 6 Mile Wash in Marble Canyon, Arizona

Page 6: Part 10

• Fontenelle Dam came perilously close to failing catastrophically in Sept 1965 during its initial filling. Seepage emanated from the right abutment. The same failure mode befell Teton Dam 11 years later.

Page 7: Part 10

• Seepage percolated along undiscovered valley-side joints (#7) in bedded sedimentary rocks at position #8

• 8 lines of grout holes were then drilled and filled with 203,500 sacks of cement

FONTENELLE DAM

Page 8: Part 10

The The Camera Rollcrete Dam in BrazilCamera Rollcrete Dam in Brazil was just two years old when if failed was just two years old when if failed because of excessive seepage along valley-side joints in July 2004. because of excessive seepage along valley-side joints in July 2004.

Page 9: Part 10

• The Zion-Mt Carmel Tunnel Gallery 3 failure occurred in April 18, 1958, spilling 84,000 tons of Navajo Sandstone onto the slope below and damaging the tunnel, containing Utah Route 9.

Page 10: Part 10

• Cross section of Pine Canyon at location of the Gallery 3 rockfall. Note valley-side joints

Page 11: Part 10

• Unravel geomorphic progression – Cliffs tend to retreat in episodic steps. All of these steps are usually discernable at any given site.

Page 12: Part 10

• Stage 1 is gross cliff retreat immediately following a major detachment. After the remaining overhang drops, a completely smooth face forms, arbitrarily designated here as Stage 2.

Page 13: Part 10

• Stage 3 a sloping cliff toe forms, controlled by valley-side joints. In Stage 4 crown blocks have detached along inclined valley-side joints

Page 14: Part 10

• Stage 5 is overhanging situation preceding massive detachment of block(s) along inclined valley-side joints


Recommended