+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

Date post: 14-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: tuyen
View: 28 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT EVALUATION: Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness An International Conference in Africa for policy-makers, program managers, evaluators, sponsors and other stakeholders in evaluation and development Sunday 29 March – Thursday 2 April 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
16
Participatory Assessment Participatory Assessment of Conservation and of Conservation and Livelihood Indicators in Livelihood Indicators in Congo Forest Basin Congo Forest Basin Sangha Group Dominique Endamana, Louis Defo, Antoine Eyebe, Jeffrey Sayer, Manuel Ruiz Perez, Intu A. Boedhihartono, Cléto Ndikumagenge, Kamiss Ami PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT EVALUATION: Approaches to Assessing Development Effectiveness An International Conference in Africa for policy-makers, program managers, evaluators, sponsors and other stakeholders in evaluation and development Sunday 29 March – Thursday 2 April 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

Participatory Assessment of Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood Conservation and Livelihood Indicators in Congo Forest Indicators in Congo Forest

BasinBasin

Sangha Group

Dominique Endamana, Louis Defo, Antoine Eyebe, Jeffrey Sayer, Manuel Ruiz Perez, Intu A. Boedhihartono, Cléto Ndikumagenge,

Kamiss Ami

PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT EVALUATION: Approaches to Assessing

Development Effectiveness

An International Conference in Africa for policy-makers, program managers, evaluators, sponsors and other stakeholders in evaluation

and developmentSunday 29 March – Thursday 2 April 2009

Page 2: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

SUMMARYSUMMARY

- - ContextContext

- Steps towards Assessing Landscape - Steps towards Assessing Landscape performance performance

- Methodological Approach- Methodological Approach

- Tools- Tools

- Results- Results

- Conclusion- Conclusion

Page 3: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

- TNS 45 200 sq km is one of TNS 45 200 sq km is one of the 12 priorities landscapes the 12 priorities landscapes in Congo Basin Forestin Congo Basin Forest- Managed by 03 countries - Managed by 03 countries Cameroon, Central Africa Cameroon, Central Africa Republic and Congo Republic and Congo Republic Republic - Conservation and - Conservation and development activities are development activities are coordinated mainly by the coordinated mainly by the Congo Basin Forest Congo Basin Forest Partnership with CARPE and Partnership with CARPE and COMIFAC COMIFAC - Importance of for African - Importance of for African dense forest biodiversitydense forest biodiversity- Key technical partners - Key technical partners include WWF, IUCN, CIFOR, include WWF, IUCN, CIFOR, WCS, GTZ…WCS, GTZ…

CONTEXT

Page 4: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

Steps towards Assessing Steps towards Assessing TNS Landscape TNS Landscape

performanceperformance

Launching assessment landscape approach: Concepts & theories

2004

Selection of fist set of monitoring indicators and field testing of methodology

2008200

7

2006

2005

Refinement of methodology and practical orientation

Visualisation of Cameroon and CAR tacking tools

Simulation, Integration and linkages of existing tracking tools with priority objectives of other ongoing programmes (IUCN-LLSCARPE, COMIFAC…)

Cameroon

CAR

Cameroon

Congo

Integration of Governance aspect in current monitoring model

development of guidelines of landscape management and performance assessment

CAR

Page 5: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

DATA COLLECTIONDATA COLLECTION

Listening

Learning

Sharing

LLS

PRIMARY DATA

Page 6: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

DATA COLLECTIONDATA COLLECTION

•Review of report of specific Review of report of specific studiesstudies

•Review of report activities of Review of report activities of partners (WWF, Local NGOs, partners (WWF, Local NGOs, WCS, GTZ , local Gov)WCS, GTZ , local Gov)

•Ecological and socioeconomic Ecological and socioeconomic monitoring reportmonitoring report

6

Page 7: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

TOOLTOOLSS

Local Natural Asset Unit of measurement Score

Availability of NTFP Perception of abundance [1-5]

Availability of wildlife resources Perception of abundance [1-5]

Incidence of bush fire Perception of importance [1-5]

Process of certification/Progress on sustainable management forest

% forest concession certified [1-5]

Pollution/waste liquid Perception of pollution [1-5]

Condition of water coursesPerception of state water course [1-5]

Global natural asset Unit of measurement Score

Rate of deforestation Percentage [1-5]

Population of elephant Number of elephant [1-5]

Populations of grate apes (Gorilla) Number of GA/gorilla [1-5]

Population of Bongo Number of Bongo [1-5]

Condition of other biodiversity element Perception of abundance [1-5]

Page 8: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

TOOLTOOLSS

Social asset Unit of measurement Score

Functioning of organizations for NRM Perception on functionality [1-5]

CBNRM initiativeNumber of village in co management process [1-5]

State governance (state institution effective and effectiveness)

Perception of effectiveness of institution [1-5]

Traditional governance (litigation, conflict, participation of all social components in community affair, effectiveness of village chief...)

Percentage of litigations solved by traditional chief [1-5]

Corruption perception( public and private sector) Perception of corruption [1-5]

Associative activity levelPercentage of HH adhere to association [1-5]

implication progress of indigenous people (Baaka, Baka) in CBNRM Number of partnership with IP [1-5]

Participation of baka for taking decision

Percentage of pygmies involved in local taking decision [1-5]

Use of forestry tax

Percentage of forest royalties invested in social infrastructure [1-5]

Page 9: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

TOOLTOOLSS

Human Asset Unit of measurement Score

Heath access Number of physician per inhabitant [1-5]

Quality of education Number of qualified teacher per pupils [1-5]

Number of person with technical and professional qualification Percentage of employment to locals [1-5]

Morbidity Children rate Comparison to national average [1-5]

Adoption by youth of traditional value on SNRM (rites, ceremonies, traditional) Adoption rate [1-5]

Usage of traditional medicine Perception on predominance [1-5]

Physical Asset Unit of measurement Score

Cassava machinePercentage of village with 01 machine for 500 persons [1-5]

Habitat quality Percentage with zinc roof [1-5]

Number of water source supply Percentage of village with improved water source [1-5]

Accessibility Time of travel [1-5]

National tourism infrastructure Number of tourist per year [1-5]

Sport hunting permit Number of permit per year [1-5]

Transformation wood industry Number of job created [1-5]

Trend of price of 3 first necessity food Perception of trend [1-5]

Page 10: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

10

  Score

Social asset 5 4 3 2 1

CBNRM initiative

Co management operational at least 3 villages

Co management operational at 2 villages

Co management operational at 1 villages

Initiation of process Zero progress

State governance (state institution effective and effectiveness)

Very important support of the administration to the respect of the laws and rules

Adequate support from the administration in elaboration and validation

Little support from the administration in the elaboration and signature

Low support from the administration in the elaboration and signature

Major barrier in the elaboration and signature of file

Traditional governance (litigation, conflict, participation of all social components in community affair, effectiveness of village chief...)

More than 90% of litigations are solved by the traditional chief

70-90% of litigations are solved by the traditional chief

50-70% of litigations are solved by the traditional chief

20-50% of litigations are solved by the traditional chief

Less than 20% of litigations are solved by the traditional chief

Corruption perception( public and private sector) Inexistent

some cases isolated current generalised Very generalised

Associative activity level

90-100% of the households adhere to an association

70-90% of the households adhere to an association

50-70% of the households adhere to an association

20-50% of the households adhere to an association

Less than 20% of the households adhere to an association

Use of forestry tax

90-100% of forestry tax are invested in the social infrastructure

70-90% of forestry tax are invested in the social infrastructure

50-70% of forestry tax are invested in the social infrastructure

20-50% of forestry tax are invested in the social infrastructure

less than 20% of forestry tax are invested in the social infrastructure

Example of score measurement of social indicators

Page 11: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

RESULTSRESULTS

Page 12: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

12

MOD IndicatorsWater Access EducationHeath Habitat Road Infrastructure

Page 13: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

13

Page 14: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

• In general the trends of change are slow • Change in natural assets is slower than change in development assets • Conflict between global and local natural assets

Page 15: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

CONCLUSION

• Assess conservation and development flow benefit in Forest Congo

• Approach using assist conservation agencies to develop monitoring framework

• This approach help local people and outside advisers to better share their understanding of the problem and issues and to work closely for the same vision

• Communication with decision makers and flight against corruption

• Framework of discussion and negotiation between main stakeholders

• Conflict between local natural and global natural asset

• Build partnership with private sector

Page 16: Participatory Assessment of Conservation and Livelihood  Indicators in Congo Forest Basin

16

PARTNERS OF IMPLEMENTATIONPARTNERS OF IMPLEMENTATION

GTZMEFE

Programme Régional de l’AfriqueCentrale pour L’Environnement

CSO CBO


Recommended