+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category,...

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category,...

Date post: 04-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
41
2019 PROPOSITION K 5-YEAR PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY Approved : November 27, 2018 Prepared for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority By San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency In Coordination with Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), Department of Public Works, and Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB or Caltrain)
Transcript
Page 1: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2019 PROPOS IT ION K

5 -YEAR PR IOR IT I ZAT ION PROGRAM

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY

Approved: November 27, 2018

Prepared for the San Francisco County Transportation Authority

By San Francisco Munic ipal Transportation Agency

In Coordination with Bay Area Rapid Transi t (BART), Department of Public Works, and

Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (PCJPB or Caltrain)

Page 2: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 3: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Table of Contents

Eligibility

Prioritization Criteria

Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther

Performance Measures

Table 2 - Project Delivery Snapshot

Table 3 - Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table

Table 4 – Prop K 5-Year Project List (FY 2019/20 – FY 2023/24)

Project Information Forms

2014 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as adopted)

2014 Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program – Program of Projects (as proposed)

Eligibility

Eligibility as identified in the voter approved Prop K Expenditure Plan is as follows:

“Pedestrian Circulation and Safety: Programmatic improvements to the safety and usability of city streets for pedestrians, prioritized as identified in the Pedestrian Master Plan. Includes flashing pavement reflectors on crosswalks, pedestrian islands in the medians of major thoroughfares, sidewalk bulb-outs, sidewalk widening, and improved pedestrian circulation around BART and Caltrain stations. Includes project development and capital costs. Sponsoring agencies: DPT, MUNI, SFPW, BART, PCJPB. The first $23.8 M is Priority 1. The next $1.2 million is Priority 2, and the remainder is Priority 3. Total funding: $69.7 million; Prop K: $52.0 M.”

DPT stands for Department of Parking and Traffic, and MUNI for San Francisco Municipal Railway. DPT and MUNI are now under the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA). DPW, now referred to as SFPW, stands for Department of Public Works, BART for Bay Area Rapid Transit, and PCJPB for Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Caltrain).

Prioritization Criteria

One of the key required elements of the 5YPPs is a transparent process for how projects get selected. Prop K requires at a minimum that each category include prioritization criteria that address project readiness, community support, and relative level of need or urgency. For the 2014 5YPP update, the Citizens Advisory Committee requested that the Transportation Authority and project sponsors develop a user-friendly, transparent scoring table that could apply to all 5YPPs, and that the scoring prioritize safety and community input highly. For the 2019 5YPP update, the prioritization criteria and scoring

1

Page 4: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

are unchanged. Table 3 shows the Prioritization Criteria and Scoring Table. Each project can receive a maximum of 20 points, with 10 points allocated for programwide criteria and 10 points allocated for category specific criteria.

The Expenditure Plan also requires consideration of geographic equity in terms of project distribution that takes into account the various needs of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. In the 2019 5YPP for this category, SFMTA is proposing to use Prop K funds on projects improving safety on the Vision Zero High Injury Network throughout the City. Vision Zero is San Francisco’s policy to eliminate traffic fatalities by 2024. In order to invest resources where injuries are most concentrated, Vision Zero focuses on the City’s High Injury Network, which represents 12.8% of street miles and accounts for 61% of severe and fatal injuries.

Stretching Your Prop K Sales Tax Dollars Farther

Leveraging Prop K funds against non-Prop K fund sources (e.g., federal, state, other local funds) is necessary to fully fund the Expenditure Plan projects and programs. For the Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax revenue spent, it would be leveraged by about $0.34 in non-Prop K funds. The table below compares Prop K Expenditure Plan assumptions with proposed leveraging in the 2019 5-year project lists.

Table 1. Prop K Leveraging1

Category Expected

Leveraging (Non-Prop K Funds)

Proposed Leveraging (Non-

Prop K Funds) Pedestrian Circulation and Safety 25% 84.8%

1 This table compares the expected leveraging assumed in the Expenditure Plan with the proposed leveraging assumed in the 5-Year Project List.

This category includes a placeholder for NTIP projects that is not reflected in the proposed leveraging calculation. The actual leveraging will be known once NTIP projects are identified and prioritized for these funds.

Performance Measures

Prop K requires the establishment of performance measures for each programmatic category in the Expenditure Plan. The intent is to demonstrate the system performance benefits of sales tax projects (e.g. reduced transit travel time), to ensure funds are being used cost effectively, and to inform allocation of Prop K funds and programming and prioritization of other funds by the Transportation Authority (e.g. Transportation Fund for Clean Air, Prop AA Vehicle Registration Fee funds).

The goals of the projects within this category are to improve walking safety, accessibility, convenience, and comfort. In order to monitor progress toward achieving these goals, the

2

Page 5: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

SFMTA has developed performance measures as part of the Vision Zero Two-Year Action Strategy. The following performance measures enumerate actual infrastructure installed for improving safety.

1. Number of miles of safety treatments installed on the High Injury Network2. Percentage of safety treatment miles installed in Communities of Concern3. Number of intersections improved with accessible (audible) pedestrian signals4. Number and percent of signalized intersections with pedestrian countdown signals

In addition to the pedestrian facility improvements funded through Prop K, there are many other factors that influence safety and circulation. For example, pedestrian circulation is largely linked to land use patterns, and pedestrian safety is impacted by traffic volumes, enforcement actions, and outreach/education programs that are outside of the scope of this Prop K funding category.

3

Page 6: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otPe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion

and

Safe

ty

5-Y

ear P

riorit

izat

ion

Prog

ram

(5Y

PP) P

erio

d *

Prog

ram

med

(Ava

ilabl

e fo

rA

lloca

tion)

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

% A

lloca

ted

2005

5Y

PP (F

Y 2

004/

05-2

008/

09)

3,70

4,49

3$

2,

310,

995

$

18

%20

09 5

YPP

(FY

200

9/10

-201

3/14

)5,

464,

862

$

3,69

1,46

5$

29%

2014

5Y

PP (F

Ys 2

014/

15 -

2018

/19)

as o

f 7/2

4/20

188,

328,

058

$

6,91

6,97

4$

54%

Tot

al12

,919

,434

$

*U

nallo

cate

d fu

nds a

re c

arrie

d fo

rwar

d fo

r pro

gram

min

g in

the

follo

win

g 5Y

PP p

erio

d.

Tabl

es sh

ow a

lloca

tions

and

per

cent

com

plet

e th

roug

h Ju

ne 3

0, 2

018,

bas

ed o

n pr

ojec

t spo

nsor

s' pr

ogre

ss re

port

s.A

ll Pr

ojec

ts/P

roje

ct P

hase

s (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

e(s)

Fun

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

% C

ompl

ete

SFM

TA20

04/0

55-

Yea

r Prio

ritiz

atio

n Pr

ogra

mE

nviro

nmen

tal

92,0

00$

10

0%SF

MTA

2004

/05

Pede

stria

n Is

land

s and

Cro

ssw

alks

Impr

ovem

ents

Des

ign

211,

707

$

100%

SFM

TA20

04/0

5Pe

dest

rian

Proj

ects

- Pe

dest

rian

Safe

Cur

b Bu

lbs

Des

ign

53,0

00$

10

0%BA

RT

2005

/06

Balb

oa P

ark

Stat

ion

Wes

tsid

e E

ntra

nce

and

Wal

kway

Des

ign

25,0

00$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Acc

essib

le P

edes

tria

n Si

gnal

s: C

ityw

ide

Phas

e II

Env

ironm

enta

l38

,788

$

100%

SFM

TA20

05/0

6C

orrid

ors:

Mar

ket S

tree

t Cro

ssw

alk

Res

ptrip

ing

and

Lim

it Li

nes

Con

stru

ctio

n19

,860

$

100%

SFM

TA20

05/0

6In

nova

tive

Dev

ice

Test

ing/

Adj

ustm

ents

Con

stru

ctio

n13

0,77

6$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Med

ian

and

Cur

b R

amp

Acc

essib

ility

Des

ign

54,9

41$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d - P

hela

n A

venu

e C

ross

wal

k Im

prov

emen

tsE

nviro

nmen

tal

35,0

65$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Pede

stria

n C

ount

dow

ns-D

ivisi

dero

Str

eet &

Hay

es S

tree

tE

nviro

nmen

tal

17,0

82$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Pede

stria

n C

ount

dow

ns-G

eary

Bou

leva

rd &

Lag

una

Stre

etE

nviro

nmen

tal

2,31

1$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Pede

stria

n C

ount

dow

ns-V

an N

ess A

venu

eE

nviro

nmen

tal

26,1

62$

10

0%SF

MTA

2005

/06

Pede

stria

n Si

gnal

s -

16th

and

Fol

som

Str

eets

Con

stru

ctio

n20

,816

$

100%

SFM

TA20

05/0

6Pe

dsaf

e C

urb

Bulb

sC

onst

ruct

ion

1,40

3$

10

0%BA

RT

2006

/07

Balb

oa P

ark

Stat

ion

Wes

tsid

e E

ntra

nce

and

Wal

kway

Con

stru

ctio

n21

7,00

0$

10

0%SF

MTA

2006

/07

3rd

Stre

et L

RT

Acc

essib

le P

edes

tria

n Si

gnal

sE

nviro

nmen

tal

192,

074

$

100%

4

Page 7: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otPe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion

and

Safe

tyA

ll Pr

ojec

ts/P

roje

ct P

hase

s (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

e(s)

Fun

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

% C

ompl

ete

SFM

TA20

06/0

7Ph

elan

Ave

nue

Pede

stria

n Im

prov

emen

tsC

onst

ruct

ion

18,6

53$

10

0%SF

MTA

2006

/07

Van

Nes

s Ave

nue

Pede

stria

n C

ount

dow

n Si

gnal

sC

onst

ruct

ion

92,5

33$

10

0%SF

MTA

2007

/08

Acc

essib

le P

edes

tria

n Si

gnal

s Sel

ectio

n &

Des

ign

Env

ironm

enta

l15

9,73

4$

10

0%SF

MTA

2007

/08

Gol

den

Gat

e Pa

rk P

edes

tria

n an

d Bi

cycl

e Im

prov

emen

tsE

nviro

nmen

tal

20,5

31$

10

0%SF

MTA

2007

/08

Ladd

er C

ross

wal

ks M

aint

enan

ceC

onst

ruct

ion

41,9

93$

10

0%SF

MTA

2008

/09

Acc

essib

le P

edes

tria

n Si

gnal

sC

onst

ruct

ion

727,

502

$

100%

SFM

TA20

08/0

9E

ddy

and

Elli

s Sid

ewal

k Bu

lbs

Con

stru

ctio

n50

,000

$

100%

SFM

TA20

08/0

9La

dder

Cro

ssw

alks

Mai

nten

ance

Con

stru

ctio

n62

,065

$

100%

SFM

TA20

09/1

0C

onve

rtin

g St

anda

rd C

ross

wal

ks to

Con

tinen

tal C

ross

wal

ks

Plan

ning

79,9

89$

10

0%SF

MTA

2009

/10

Dub

oce

Ave

nue

Cur

b E

xten

sions

D

esig

n44

,333

$

100%

SFM

TA20

09/1

0D

uboc

e A

venu

e Pe

dest

rian

Impr

ovem

ents

Con

stru

ctio

n17

3,00

0$

10

0%SF

MTA

2009

/10

Pede

stria

n C

ount

ing

Proj

ect

Con

stru

ctio

n54

,853

$

100%

SFM

TA20

09/1

0R

ed V

isibi

lity

Cur

bs

Plan

ning

29,1

35$

10

0%SF

MTA

2009

/10

Re-

open

ing

Clo

sed

Cro

ssw

alks

Pl

anni

ng19

3,32

1$

10

0%SF

MTA

2009

/10

Scho

ol C

ross

wal

k M

aint

enan

ce

Con

stru

ctio

n74

,560

$

100%

SFM

TA20

10/1

1C

onve

rtin

g St

anda

rd C

ross

wal

ks to

Con

tinen

tal C

ross

wal

ksD

esig

n89

,529

$

100%

SFM

TA20

10/1

1N

ew P

edes

tria

n Si

gnal

s D

esig

n15

6,78

4$

10

0%SF

MTA

2010

/11

New

Ped

estr

ian

Sign

als

Env

ironm

enta

l41

,658

$

100%

SFM

TA20

10/1

1Pe

dest

rian

Cou

ntin

gPl

anni

ng25

,000

$

100%

SFM

TA20

10/1

1R

ed V

isibi

lity

Cur

bsD

esig

n29

,743

$

100%

SFM

TA20

10/1

1Sc

hool

Cro

ssw

alk

Mai

nten

ance

Plan

ning

69,2

42$

10

0%SF

MTA

2011

/12

Cro

ssw

alk

Mai

nten

ance

Con

stru

ctio

n56

,577

$

100%

SFM

TA20

11/1

2C

ross

wal

k M

aint

enan

ce

Env

ironm

enta

l14

,397

$

100%

SFM

TA20

11/1

2M

issio

n-G

enev

a Tr

ansit

and

Ped

estr

ian

Impr

ovem

ents

C

onst

ruct

ion

96,4

92$

10

0%

5

Page 8: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otPe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion

and

Safe

tyA

ll Pr

ojec

ts/P

roje

ct P

hase

s (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

e(s)

Fun

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

% C

ompl

ete

SFM

TA20

11/1

2Pe

dest

rian

Ref

uge

Isla

nds

Des

ign

22,1

49$

10

0%

SFPW

2011

/12

Uni

on S

quar

e Pu

blic

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay A

cces

sibili

ty Im

prov

emen

tsC

onst

ruct

ion

514,

456

$

100%

SFM

TA20

12/1

320

14 5

YPP

Dev

elop

men

tE

nviro

nmen

tal

19,0

00$

10

0%SF

MTA

2012

/13

Con

tinen

tal C

ross

wal

ks a

nd R

ed V

isibi

lity

Cur

bsC

onst

ruct

ion

33,2

85$

10

0%SF

MTA

2012

/13

Con

tinen

tal C

ross

wor

ksPl

anni

ng19

,393

$

100%

SFM

TA20

12/1

3C

ontin

enta

l Cro

ssw

orks

D

esig

n62

,730

$

100%

SFM

TA20

12/1

3Fr

ankl

in S

tree

t Sig

nal U

pgra

des

Des

ign

68,0

23$

10

0%SF

MTA

2012

/13

Man

sell

Cor

ridor

Impr

ovem

ents

Pl

anni

ng11

9,11

2$

10

0%SF

MTA

2012

/13

New

Ped

estr

ian

Sign

als

Con

stru

ctio

n86

4,07

7$

10

0%SF

MTA

2012

/13

O'S

haug

hnes

sy &

Del

Val

e C

ross

wal

k C

onst

ruct

ion

76,0

26$

10

0%SF

MTA

2012

/13

O'S

haug

hnes

sy &

Del

Val

e C

ross

wal

k D

esig

n27

,992

$

100%

SFM

TA20

12/1

3Si

lver

and

Aug

usta

Isla

nd a

nd B

ulb-

out

Con

stru

ctio

n57

,342

$

100%

SFPW

2012

/13

Sloa

t Bou

leva

rd P

edes

tria

n Im

prov

emen

tsD

esig

n33

,552

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

46t

h St

reet

Impr

ovem

ents

Env

ironm

enta

l38

,601

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

46t

h St

reet

Impr

ovem

ents

Plan

ning

123,

451

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

47t

h &

8th

Str

eets

Str

eets

cape

Env

ironm

enta

l66

,071

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

47t

h &

8th

Str

eets

Str

eets

cape

Plan

ning

113,

929

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

4Bi

cycl

e &

Ped

estr

ian

Proj

ects

- Sp

eed

& V

olum

e Su

rvey

s Pl

anni

ng21

,500

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

4M

anse

ll C

orrid

or Im

prov

emen

ts

Env

ironm

enta

l44

,130

$

100%

SFM

TA20

13/1

4Pe

dest

rian

Ref

uge

Isla

nds

Con

stru

ctio

n41

,210

$

100%

SFPW

2013

/14

Sloa

t Bou

leva

rd P

edes

tria

n Im

prov

emen

ts

Con

stru

ctio

n96

,825

$

100%

SFM

TA20

14/1

5C

esar

Cha

vez/

Bays

hore

/Pot

rero

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

[NTI

P C

apita

l] Pl

anni

ng44

,686

$

100%

6

Page 9: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otPe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion

and

Safe

tyA

ll Pr

ojec

ts/P

roje

ct P

hase

s (s

orte

d by

allo

catio

n ye

ar, t

hen

spon

sor,

then

pro

ject

nam

e)

Spon

sor

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

e(s)

Fun

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

% C

ompl

ete

SFM

TA20

14/1

5G

olde

n G

ate

Ave

nue

Roa

d D

iet [

Visi

on Z

ero]

Con

stru

ctio

n12

0,00

0$

10

0%SF

MTA

2014

/15

Wal

kFirs

t Con

tinen

tal C

ross

wal

ksC

onst

ruct

ion

278,

854

$

100%

SFM

TA20

14/1

5W

alkF

irst P

hase

1 P

edes

tria

n Sa

fety

Impl

emen

tatio

n [V

ision

Zer

o]

Con

stru

ctio

n80

0,00

0$

10

0%

SFM

TA20

14/1

5W

alkF

irst P

hase

1 P

edes

tria

n Sa

fety

Impl

emen

tatio

n [V

ision

Zer

o]

Des

ign

200,

000

$

100%

SFM

TA20

14/1

5W

alkF

irst R

ecta

ngul

ar R

apid

Fla

shin

g Be

acon

s Pl

anni

ng17

,100

$

100%

SFM

TA20

14/1

5W

alkF

irst R

ecta

ngul

ar R

apid

Fla

shin

g Be

acon

s D

esig

n47

,400

$

100%

SFPW

2014

/15

ER

Tay

lor E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Scho

ol

Con

stru

ctio

n6,

575

$

100%

SFPW

2014

/15

Long

fello

w E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e R

oute

s to

Scho

ol

Con

stru

ctio

n64

,578

$

100%

SFM

TA20

15/1

6Be

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]D

esig

n3,

795

$

100%

SFM

TA20

15/1

6Be

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l] C

onst

ruct

ion

11,0

72$

10

0%SF

MTA

2015

/16

Bess

ie C

arm

icha

el C

ross

wal

k [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

Plan

ning

6,52

5$

10

0%SF

MTA

2016

/17

Wig

gle

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d G

reen

Cor

ridor

C

onst

ruct

ion

572,

100

$

100%

SFPW

2016

/17

Bays

hore

Blv

d/C

esar

Cha

vez

St/P

otre

ro A

ve In

ters

ectio

n (T

he

Hai

rbal

l - S

egm

ents

F &

G) [

NTI

P C

apita

l]D

esig

n80

,000

$

100%

7

Page 10: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Tab

le 2

. Pro

ject

Del

iver

y Sn

apsh

otPe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion

and

Safe

tyPr

ojec

ts/P

roje

ct P

hase

s U

nder

way

(sor

ted

by a

lloca

tion

year

, the

n sp

onso

r, th

en p

roje

ct n

ame)

Spon

sor

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

e(s)

Fun

ded

Tot

al A

lloca

ted

% C

ompl

ete

SFM

TA20

14/1

5W

alkF

irst R

ecta

ngul

ar R

apid

Fla

shin

g Be

acon

s C

onst

ruct

ion

158,

400

$

20%

SFM

TA20

15/1

66t

h St

reet

Ped

estr

ian

Safe

ty Im

prov

emen

tE

nviro

nmen

tal

2,01

2,00

0$

75%

SFM

TA20

16/1

7E

lk S

tree

t at S

usse

x St

reet

Ped

estr

ian

Safe

ty Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

Des

ign

80,0

00$

65

%

SFM

TA20

17/1

8Lo

wer

Gre

at H

ighw

ay P

edes

tria

n Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

Des

ign

70,5

00$

75

%

SFM

TA20

17/1

8Lo

wer

Gre

at H

ighw

ay P

edes

tria

n Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

Con

stru

ctio

n17

9,50

0$

0%

SFM

TA20

17/1

8Sa

fe S

tree

ts P

roje

ct E

valu

atio

n Pl

anni

ng13

0,15

0$

35

%SF

PW20

17/1

8A

lem

any

Inte

rcha

nge

Impr

ovem

ent P

hase

2 [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

Env

ironm

enta

l20

,000

$

50%

SFPW

2017

/18

Ale

man

y In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

t Pha

se 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l] D

esig

n38

0,00

0$

0%

SFPW

2017

/18

Bays

hore

Blv

d/C

esar

Cha

vez

St/P

otre

ro A

ve In

ters

ectio

n Im

prov

emen

ts (T

he H

airb

all)

[NTI

P C

apita

l] C

onst

ruct

ion

220,

000

$

20%

SFPW

2018

/19

Jeff

erso

n St

reet

Impr

ovem

ents

Pha

se 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l]C

onst

ruct

ion

1,41

3,74

0$

0%

For m

ore

info

rmat

ion

abou

t the

pro

ject

s fun

ded

by th

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y, a

s wel

l as p

roje

cts f

or w

hich

we

help

ove

rsee

in o

ur ro

le a

s the

Con

gest

ion

Man

agem

ent A

genc

y fo

r San

Fra

ncisc

o, v

isit o

ur in

tera

ctiv

e pr

ojec

t map

at m

ystr

eets

f.sfc

ta.o

rg.

8

Page 11: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

Tab

le 3

- Pr

iorit

izat

ion

Crit

eria

and

Sco

ring

Tab

lePe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion/

Safe

ty (E

P 40

)

Proj

ect

Rea

dine

ssC

omm

unity

Su

ppor

tT

ime

Sens

itive

U

rgen

cySa

fety

Prov

ides

B

enef

its to

M

ultip

le U

sers

Hig

h In

jury

C

orrid

orL

ever

agin

gT

otal

Tot

al P

ossi

ble

Scor

e4

33

33

22

20

Gro

ve S

treet

/Civ

ic C

ente

r Im

prov

emen

ts2

30

23

22

14Fo

lsom

-How

ard

Stre

etsc

ape

33

13

32

217

Lake

Mer

ced

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

10

02

22

18

Leav

enw

orth

Liv

able

Stre

et1

30

32

22

13M

issio

n St

reet

Exc

elsio

r Saf

ety

32

03

32

215

Mon

tere

y St

reet

Saf

ety

Impr

ovem

ents

10

02

32

210

Visi

on Z

ero

Impr

ovem

ents

Pla

ceho

lder

NTI

P Pl

aceh

olde

rL

ocat

ions

will

be

scor

ed a

t the

tim

e of

allo

catio

n. S

ee te

xt a

nd P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

for m

ore

deta

ils.

Loc

atio

ns w

ill b

e sc

ored

at t

he ti

me

of a

lloca

tion.

See

text

and

Pro

ject

Inf

orm

atio

n Fo

rm fo

r mor

e de

tails

.

Com

mun

ity S

uppo

rt: P

roje

ct h

as c

lear

and

div

erse

com

mun

ity su

ppor

t and

/or w

as it

iden

tifie

d th

roug

h a

com

mun

ity-b

ased

pla

nnin

g pr

oces

s. A

n ex

ampl

e of

a c

omm

unity

-bas

ed p

lan

is a

neig

hbor

hood

tran

spor

tatio

n pl

an, b

ut

not a

cou

ntyw

ide

plan

or a

genc

y ca

pita

l im

prov

emen

t pro

gram

.Th

ree

poin

ts fo

r a p

roje

ct in

an

adop

ted

com

mun

ity b

ased

pla

n w

ith e

vide

nce

of d

iver

se c

omm

unity

supp

ort.

Two

poin

ts fo

r a p

roje

ct w

ith e

vide

nce

of su

ppor

t fro

m b

oth

neig

hbor

hood

stak

ehol

ders

and

gro

ups a

nd c

ityw

ide

grou

ps.

One

poi

nt fo

r a p

roje

ct w

ith e

vide

nce

of su

ppor

t fro

m e

ither

nei

ghbo

rhoo

d st

akeh

olde

rs a

nd g

roup

s or c

ityw

ide

grou

ps.

Proj

ect R

eadi

ness

: Pro

ject

like

ly to

nee

d fu

ndin

g in

fisc

al y

ear p

ropo

sed.

Fac

tors

to b

e co

nsid

ered

incl

ude

adeq

uacy

of s

cope

, sch

edul

e, b

udge

t and

fund

ing

plan

rela

tive

to c

urre

nt p

roje

ct st

atus

(e.g

. exp

ect m

ore

deta

il an

d ce

rtain

ty fo

r a p

roje

ct a

bout

to e

nter

con

stru

ctio

n th

an d

esig

n); w

heth

er p

rior p

roje

ct p

hase

s are

com

plet

ed o

r exp

ecte

d to

be

com

plet

ed b

efor

e be

ginn

ing

the

next

pha

se; a

nd w

heth

er li

tigat

ion,

com

mun

ity o

ppos

ition

or o

ther

fa

ctor

s may

sign

ifica

ntly

del

ay p

roje

ct.

Tim

e Se

nsiti

ve U

rgen

cy: P

roje

ct n

eeds

to p

roce

ed in

pro

pose

d tim

efra

me

to e

nabl

e co

nstru

ctio

n co

ordi

natio

n w

ith a

noth

er p

roje

ct (e

.g. m

inim

ize

cost

s and

con

stru

ctio

n im

pact

s), t

o su

ppor

t ano

ther

fund

ed o

r pro

pose

d pr

ojec

t (e.

g. n

ew si

gnal

con

trolle

rs n

eed

to b

e in

stal

led

to su

ppor

t TE

P im

plem

enta

tion)

or t

o m

eet t

imel

y us

e of

fund

s dea

dlin

es a

ssoc

iate

d w

ith m

atch

ing

fund

s.

PRO

P K

PR

OG

RA

M-W

IDE

CR

ITE

RIA

CA

TE

GO

RY

SPE

CIF

IC C

RIT

ER

IA

Prio

ritiz

atio

n C

riter

ia D

efin

ition

s:

City

wid

e Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty a

nd C

ircul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

ts

Cor

ridor

Pro

ject

s

Lev

erag

ing:

Pro

ject

leve

rage

s non

-Pro

p K

fund

s.Pr

ovid

es B

enef

its to

Mul

tiple

Use

rs: P

roje

ct re

ceiv

es o

ne p

oint

eac

h fo

r add

ress

ing

the

need

s of b

icyc

lists

, mot

orist

s and

/or t

rans

it us

ers.

Hig

h In

jury

Cor

ridor

: Pro

ject

is lo

cate

d on

the

2017

Visi

on Z

ero

Hig

h In

jury

Net

wor

k.Sa

fety

: (O

ne p

oint

for e

ach)

: Pro

ject

add

ress

es d

ocum

ente

d sa

fety

issu

e; re

duce

s pot

entia

l con

flict

s bet

wee

n m

odes

; and

incr

ease

s sec

urity

.

9

Page 12: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/23

2023

/24

Cor

ridor

Pro

ject

sSF

MTA

Gro

ve S

treet

/Civ

ic C

ente

r Im

prov

emen

tsPS

&E

Plan

ned

$200

,000

$200

,000

SFM

TAG

rove

Stre

et/C

ivic

Cen

ter I

mpr

ovem

ents

CO

NPl

anne

d$1

,391

,000

$1,3

91,0

00

SFM

TAFo

lsom

-How

ard

Stre

etsc

ape

CO

NPl

anne

d$9

00,9

63$9

00,9

63

SFM

TALa

ke M

erce

d Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty

PS&

EPl

anne

d$8

0,00

0$8

0,00

0

SFM

TALa

ke M

erce

d Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty

CO

NPl

anne

d$4

00,0

00$4

00,0

00

SFM

TALe

aven

wor

th L

ivab

le S

treet

PLA

N/

CE

RPl

anne

d$7

50,0

00$7

50,0

00

SFM

TAM

issio

n St

reet

Exc

elsio

r Saf

ety

PS&

EPl

anne

d$1

,000

,000

$1,0

00,0

00SF

MTA

Mon

tere

y St

reet

Saf

ety

Impr

ovem

ents

PS&

EPl

anne

d$2

45,0

00$2

45,0

00C

ityw

ide

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

& C

ircul

atio

n Im

prov

emen

ts

SFM

TAV

ision

Zer

o Im

prov

emen

ts P

lace

hold

erC

ON

Plan

ned

$1,0

00,0

00$1

,000

,000

SFM

TAV

ision

Zer

o Im

prov

emen

ts P

lace

hold

erC

ON

Plan

ned

$1,0

00,0

00$1

,000

,000

Any

E

ligib

leN

TIP

Plac

ehol

der

Any

Plan

ned

$1,1

00,0

00$1

,100

,000

$2,6

25,0

00

$1,6

50,9

63

$1,7

91,0

00

$1,0

00,0

00

$1,0

00,0

00

$8,0

66,9

63

$625

,674

$7

43,7

33

$783

,857

$8

23,8

67

$865

,795

$3

,842

,926

($

1,99

9,32

6)($

2,90

6,55

6)($

3,91

3,69

9)($

4,08

9,83

2)($

4,22

4,03

7)($

4,22

4,03

7)C

umul

ativ

e R

emai

ning

Pro

gram

min

g C

apac

ity

Tota

l

Fund

s R

eque

sted

in 2

019

5YPP

Fund

s Pr

ogra

mm

ed in

201

9 St

rate

gic

Plan

Bas

elin

e

Age

ncy

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Prog

ram

min

g

Tab

le 4

- 20

19 P

rop

K 5

-Yea

r Prio

ritiz

atio

n Pr

ogra

m -

Prog

ram

of P

roje

cts

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n an

d Sa

fety

Cat

egor

y (E

P 40

)

10

Page 13: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2019

/20

2020

/21

2021

/22

2022

/23

2023

/24

2024

/25

Cor

ridor

Pro

ject

sG

rove

Stre

et/C

ivic

Cen

ter I

mpr

ovem

ents

PS&

E$4

0,00

0$1

60,0

00$2

00,0

00

Gro

ve S

treet

/Civ

ic C

ente

r Im

prov

emen

tsC

ON

$851

,000

$540

,000

$1,3

91,0

00

Folso

m-H

owar

d St

reet

scap

eC

ON

$900

,963

$900

,963

Lake

Mer

ced

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

PS

&E

$20,

000

$60,

000

$80,

000

Lake

Mer

ced

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

C

ON

$200

,000

$200

,000

$400

,000

Leav

enw

orth

Liv

able

Stre

etPL

AN

/ C

ER

$375

,000

$375

,000

$750

,000

Miss

ion

Stre

et E

xcel

sior S

afet

y PS

&E

$500

,000

$500

,000

$1,0

00,0

00M

onte

rey

Stre

et S

afet

y Im

prov

emen

tsPS

&E

$10,

000

$235

,000

$245

,000

City

wid

e Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty &

Circ

ulat

ion

Impr

ovem

ents

Visi

on Z

ero

Impr

ovem

ents

Pla

ceho

lder

CO

N$5

00,0

00$5

00,0

00$1

,000

,000

Visi

on Z

ero

Impr

ovem

ents

Pla

ceho

lder

CO

N$5

00,0

00$5

00,0

00$1

,000

,000

NTI

P Pl

aceh

olde

rA

ny$5

50,0

00$5

50,0

00$1

,100

,000

$1,1

20,0

00

$1,8

80,0

00

$1,4

26,0

00

$2,1

40,9

63

$1,0

00,0

00

$500

,000

$8

,066

,963

$6

25,6

74

$743

,733

$7

83,8

57

$823

,867

$8

65,7

95

$0

$3,8

42,9

26

($49

4,32

6)($

1,63

0,59

3)($

2,27

2,73

6)($

3,58

9,83

2)($

3,72

4,03

7)($

4,22

4,03

7)($

4,22

4,03

7)C

umul

ativ

e R

emai

ning

Cas

h Fl

ow C

apac

ity

Cas

h Fl

ow R

eque

sted

in 2

019

5YPP

Cas

h Fl

ow in

201

9 St

rate

gic

Plan

Bas

elin

e

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eFi

scal

Yea

rTo

tal

Cas

h Fl

ow (M

axim

um A

nnua

l Rei

mbu

rsem

ent)

Tab

le 4

- 20

19 P

rop

K 5

-Yea

r Prio

ritiz

atio

n Pr

ogra

m -

Prog

ram

of P

roje

cts

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n an

d Sa

fety

Cat

egor

y (E

P 40

)

11

Page 14: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:Implementing Agency:

Category:Subcategory: EP Line (Primary):Other EP Line Number/s: Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:Supervisorial District(s):Project Manager:Phone Number:Email:Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 60% In-house Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2016/17 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 60% In-house Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2016/17 Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2019/20Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2019/20 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2020/21Advertise Construction

Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% In-house and Contracted Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2021/22

Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure) Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2023/24

District 06, District 05

SFPW-John DennisSF Planning-Nick Perry

Under the direction of SF Planning, the Civic Center Public Realm Plan will create recommended improvements in the City Hall/Civic Center area. Public engagement process, consists of two workshops, online survey, and mobile outreach station to date, and a final open house in Fall 2018. https://civiccentersf.org/about/outreach/

Matt Lasky

701-5228

[email protected]

Project will implement bicycle and pedestrian improvements on Grove Street between Octavia Boulevard and Market Street. Project includes street design and roadway changes that correlate with the circulation and collision patterns of the area, as well as data analysis, additional outreach, and preparation of conceptual designs for the final plan document. SFMTA will implement several near-term improvements based on analysis of key conflict areas and opportunities effective safety improvements. Following the environmental clearance of the project, SFMTA will work with Public Works to implement more detailed proposed changes.

Start Date End Date

Categorically Exempt

Comments/Concerns

Design and construct bicycle and pedestrian improvements on Grove Street between Octavia Boulevard and Market Street.

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan InformationC. Street & Traffic Safety

39-Bicycle Circulation/Safety

2019/20, 2021/22

Grove Street between Octavia Boulevard and Market Street.

Project Information

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Grove Street/Civic Center ImprovementsSan Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

12

Page 15: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g22

0,00

0$

-

$

220,

000

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

400,

000

$

400,

000

$

Con

stru

ctio

n3,

600,

000

$

2,78

2,00

0$

81

8,00

0$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

4,22

0,00

0$

3,

182,

000

$

1,03

8,00

0$

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al75

%25

%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Line

Phas

eFu

nd S

ourc

e St

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

Prop

B G

ener

al F

und

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual

Eng

inee

ring

Allo

cate

dPr

evio

us22

0,00

0$

Prop

K39

-Bic

ycle

C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Plan

ned

2019

/20

200,

000

$

40,0

00$

16

0,00

0$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estri

anC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Plan

ned

2019

/20

200,

000

$

40,0

00$

16

0,00

0$

Prop

K39

-Bic

ycle

C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

21/2

21,

391,

000

$

851,

000

$

54

0,00

0$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estri

anC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

21/2

21,

391,

000

$

851,

000

$

54

0,00

0$

Prop

B G

ener

al F

und

Con

stru

ctio

nPr

ogra

mm

ed20

21/2

281

8,00

0$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r4,

220,

000

$

-

$

80,0

00$

32

0,00

0$

1,70

2,00

0$

1,

080,

000

$

-$

Com

men

ts

Gro

ve S

treet

/Civ

ic C

ente

r Im

prov

emen

ts

This

proj

ect p

ropo

ses p

rogr

amm

ing

in b

oth

EP

39 a

nd E

P 40

.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i.

e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

13

Page 16: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

Yes

District 06

SFPW - Kelli Rudnick

The EN TRIPS effort and the Central Corridor/Central Soma Plan, included robust community outreach and led to recommendations in the project area. While outreach for the project is ongoing, it has already been some of the most extensive ever done on an SFMTA streetscape project. For both the long-term and near-term components, three series of open houses were held comprising six total public meetings attended by over 300 people. Together with online responses and in-person outreach in conjunction with community groups, those efforts generated 1,300 survey responses, many of which were collected in Filipino. The team canvassed the corridor’s local businesses, knocking on all 165 doors that were identified as business locations. The team has met with over 75 businesses and 20 different community groups since the beginning of the project.

The SFMTA has performed concentrated, in-depth outreach to relevant stakeholders to allow the SFMTA to work directly with community-based organizations to obtain further community input from within the SoMa Youth and Family Zone to explore how the Folsom and Howard re-designs can best address pedestrian safety and access to the community assets (e.g. schools, recreation centers, etc.) within the Zone. Tasks from this Prop K NTIP-funded effort include initial stakeholder interviews with Youth and Family Zone leadership, public open houses, and follow-up meetings with stakeholders.

Paul Stanis

415.701.5396

[email protected]

Implementation of better, safer streets on Howard Street between 3rd Street and 11th Street and on Folsom Street between 2nd Street and 11th Street, including improvements to bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities, upgrades to traffic signals, traffic circulation modifications, and changes to parking and loading. Project will redesign street couplets that are the cornerstone of the growing SoMa neighborhood. Improvements will include protected bicycle facilities; new corner bulbs and transit islands at intersections reducing pedestrian crossing distances and improving Muni service; transit-only lanes; new signals at midblock locations or alleyways; and construction of raised crosswalks at alleyways.

Categorically Exempt

Implementation of better, safer streets on Howard Street between 3rd Street and 11th Street and on Folsom Street between 2nd Street and 11th Street, including improvements to bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities, upgrades to traffic signals, traffic circulation modifications, and changes to parking and loading.

Fact sheet; https://www.sfmta.com/projects/folsom-howard-streetscape-project

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

2020/21

Howard between 3rd Street and 11th Sreet & Folsom between 2nd Street and 11th Street.

Project Information

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Folsom-Howard Streetscape

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

14

Page 17: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 100% In-house and Contracted

Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2015/16 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2016/17

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 90% In-house and Contracted

Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2016/17 Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19

Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19 Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2020/21Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% TBD Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2020/21Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2023/24

Start Date End Date

Comments/Concerns

15

Page 18: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g42

1,75

1$

21

8,75

1$

20

3,00

0$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

1,09

7,00

0$

-

$

1,09

7,00

0$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

6,21

7,80

0$

-

$

6,21

7,80

0$

Con

stru

ctio

n27

,299

,037

$

900,

963

$

26,3

98,0

74$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

35,0

35,5

88$

1,

119,

714

$

33,9

15,8

74$

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al3%

97%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Lin

ePh

ase

Fund

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

IPIC

- E

aste

rn N

eigh

borh

oods

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gA

lloca

ted

Prev

ious

203,

000

$

Prop

K44

-Tra

nspo

rtat

ion/

Land

U

se C

oord

inat

ion

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gA

lloca

ted

Prev

ious

218,

751

$

21

8,75

1$

IPIC

- E

aste

rn N

eigh

borh

oods

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Allo

cate

dPr

evio

us1,

097,

000

$

IPIC

- E

aste

rn N

eigh

borh

oods

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Allo

cate

dPr

evio

us6,

217,

800

$

IPIC

- E

aste

rn N

eigh

borh

oods

Con

stru

ctio

nPr

ogra

mm

ed20

20/2

115

,202

,200

$

Prop

A G

O B

ond

Con

stru

ctio

nPr

ogra

mm

ed20

20/2

15,

215,

800

$

TBD

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

20/2

15,

980,

074

$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ianC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

20/2

190

0,96

3$

900,

963

$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r35

,035

,588

$

21

8,75

1$

-

$

-$

-

$

900,

963

$

-$

Com

men

ts

Folso

m-H

owar

d St

reet

scap

e

IPIC

- In

tera

genc

y Pl

an Im

plem

enta

tion

Com

mitt

ee (d

evel

opm

ent i

mpa

ct fe

es).

TBD

sour

ces m

ay in

clud

e A

TP, H

SIP,

AH

SC, n

on-I

PIC

dev

elop

er fe

es, o

r new

loca

l rev

enue

sour

ces s

uch

as sa

les t

ax, g

ener

al ob

ligat

ion

bond

fund

s, or

tran

spor

tatio

n ne

twor

k co

mpa

ny (T

NC

) tax

.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i

.e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

16

Page 19: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE PROJECTStreetscape Project Factsheet (Winter 2018)

SFMTA.COM/FOLSOMHOWARD

Why Improve Folsom and Howard Streets?

Folsom and Howard are a part of the High Injury Network, the 12 percent of city streets with 70 percent of the severe and fatal collisions.

Over the last 5 years, 3 people were killed and 308 people were injured on Folsom and Howard streets including:

• 1 Pedestrian fatality on Howard

• 1 Bicyclist fatality on Folsom

• 1 Bicyclist fatality on Howard

What Will The Project Do?

The Folsom-Howard Streetscape Project will make SoMa more livable by making it safer and more pleasant to walk, bike, shop and live along Folsom St. from 11th to 2nd and Howard St. from 11th to 3rd. The project will:

• Improve safety for all users of the corridor

• Make biking and walking in SoMa a morecomfortable experience

• Improve loading for local businesses

• Give transit services priority and elevate their use onthe corridor

Already installed buffered bikeway on Folsom between 11th and 13th (2017)

The full Folsom-Howard Streetscape project including safety and landscaping improvements

Already installed near-term parking-protected bikeway on Folsom between 12th and 5th (2017)

Near-Term Safety Improvements We Have Already Made

While we design long-term changes, we installed parking-protected bikeways, daylighted intersections, and added transit boarding islands on Folsom from 11th to 5th to improve safety.

These improvements support San Francisco’s Vision Zero goal of eliminating traffic fatalities. These changes will improve transit, protect pedestrians and bicyclists by shorten crossing distances and provide more visibility for pedestrians and provide dedicated, protected space for bicyclists.

SFMTA Board approved the changes in October 2017. Construction began in Fall 2017 and will finish in January 2018.

17

Page 20: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

FOLSOM-HOWARD STREETSCAPE PROJECTStreetscape Project Factsheet (Winter 2018)

SFMTA.COM/FOLSOMHOWARD

Folsom and Howard only work if they work for local businesses. After meeting with more than 75 business, we have heard significant concerns about loading. To address these concerns, near-term improvements doubled the number of loading zones on Folsom Street to respond to businesses needs for additional space.

We will continue to work with the business community for the long-term project to try to improve loading along both Folsom and Howard.

Working with Local Business on Loading

Next Steps:• Near-term Improvements

Completed - Winter 2018

• Public Outreach and Open Houses- Winter and Spring 2018

• Planning Certifies Central SoMa EIR -Summer 2018 (tentative)

• SFMTA Board of Directors Approval -Summer 2018 (tentative)

• Detailed Design - 2018 to 2019(tentative)

• Construction - 2020 -2023(tentative)

Changes To Improve Pedestrian, Bicycling and Transit Infrastructure, Comfort and Safety

The proposals for the streets prioritize people by making it safer and more pleasant to walk, bicycle, and take transit on Folsom and Howard. The project will also provide opportunities for greening and public space improvements.

Changes that will improve San Franciscan’s ability to walk comfortably on this commercial corridor include:

• Sidewalks widening from 8th to 4th on Folsom’s north side

• 3 new mid-block crossings on Howard and 4 on Folsom

• Adding daylighting, bulb-outs, pedestrian head-starts

Bike improvements build on the parking-protected bikeway just installed on Folsom, adding barriers, improving intersections and increase connectivity. Changes include:

• New parking-protected bikeway on Howard

• Two-way biking on Folsom between 8th and 11th connectingriders with bike routes in the Mission

• New traffic signals that seperate turning vehicles and bikes

We will bring a transit only lane to Folsom, that coupled with increased service, will decrease travel times for riders and provide better transit connections throughout SoMa.

These changes require reducing parking by 33% on Folsom and Howard but only reduce parking by 9% in a one block radius.

18

Page 21: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

2019/20, 2021/22

Lake Merced Boulevard between Font Boulevard and Sunset Boulevard

Project Information

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Lake Merced Pedestrian Safety

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

[email protected]

Improve pedestrian crossings across Lake Merced Boulevard between Font and Sunset Boulevards. This segment is part of the Vision Zero High Injury Network, and would improve access to a major recreational site. Scope of the planning phase will include community outreach to understand current walking patterns and barriers, as well as collision and traffic patterns and an assessment of requirements to update the transit stops up to or beyond minimum standards. Recommendations from the planning phase could include new traffic beacons, enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian visibility improvements and transit stop amenities focused on safety.

As required by Community Based Transportation Plan guidelines, the planning phase includes the formation of a community steering committee, outreach activities focused on the communities of concern that are served by the project area, establishing baseline conditions, performing a needs assessment, and developing a prioritized list of projects and implementation plan.

Categorically Exempt

Improve safety for pedestrians crossing Lake Merced Boulevard between Font and Sunset Boulevards. Recommendations to be identified through a community based transportation planning process could include new traffic signals or beacons, enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian visibility improvements and transit stop amenities focused on safety.

District 07

As required by Community Based Transportation Plan guidelines, the planning phase includes the formation of a community steering committee and outreach activities focused on the communities of concern that are served by the project area.

Chava Kronenberg

19

Page 22: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% In-house Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2018/19 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19Environmental Studies (PA&ED)Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2019/20 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2020/21Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% TBD Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2021/22Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2023/24

Start Date End Date

Comments/ConcernsLegislation and environmental determination included in planning phase. This work is ineligible for reimbursement by the $50,000 in CBTP funds or the required $6,000 local match, but may be reimbursed with other local funding above the required local match.

20

Page 23: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g70

,000

$

-$

70

,000

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

80,0

00$

80

,000

$

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n40

0,00

0$

40

0,00

0$

-

$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

550,

000

$

480,

000

$

70,0

00$

Pe

rcen

t of T

otal

87%

13%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Lin

ePh

ase

Fund

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

Prop

B G

ener

al Fu

ndPl

anni

ng/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Plan

ned

Prev

ious

20,0

00$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ianC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Plan

ned

2019

/20

80,0

00$

20,0

00$

60,0

00$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ianC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

21/2

240

0,00

0$

200,

000

$

200,

000

$

Com

mun

ity B

ased

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Prog

ram

- Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Aut

horit

y

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g

Prog

ram

med

Prev

ious

50,0

00$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r55

0,00

0$

-

$

20,0

00$

60,0

00$

200,

000

$

200,

000

$

-$

Com

men

ts

Lake

Mer

ced

Pede

stria

n Sa

fety

As C

onge

stio

n M

anag

emen

t Age

ncy

for S

an F

ranc

isco,

the

Tran

spor

tatio

n A

utho

rity

perio

dica

lly re

ceiv

es c

omm

unity

-bas

ed tr

ansp

orta

tion

plan

ning

(CBT

P) fu

nds f

rom

the

Met

ropo

litan

Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Com

miss

ion.

The

CBT

P fu

nds a

re fo

r com

mun

ity b

ased

plan

ning

ef

fort

s foc

used

in C

omm

uniti

es o

f Con

cern

or t

hat p

rimar

ily b

enef

it C

omm

uniti

es o

f Con

cern

to h

elp

impr

ove

mob

ility

opt

ions

in th

ose

com

mun

ities

. Th

e pr

opos

ed p

roje

ct a

rea

is in

a n

ewly

iden

tifie

d C

omm

unity

of C

once

rn si

nce

the

last c

ycle

of C

BTP

fund

ing.

As a

co

nditi

on o

f rec

eipt

of t

he C

BTP

fund

s, SF

MTA

will

nee

d to

com

ply

with

all

of M

TC's

requ

irem

ents

for t

his g

rant

pro

gram

.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i

.e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

21

Page 24: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% In-house and Contracted

Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2019/20 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2021/22

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 0% In-house and Contracted

Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2019/20 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2021/22

Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E)Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract)Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for UseProject Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

District 03, District 06

TBD

Corridor is included in Tenderloin-Little Saigon Neighborhood Transportation Plan with recommended traffic circulation and pedestrian safety improvements.

Chava Kronenberg

[email protected]

Plan, design, and implement complete street and safety improvements on Leavenworth from McAllister to Post Streets. Project includes robust community engagement process, and will implement recommended safety countermeasures along the corridor, including near-term (paint and sign) and long-term (constructed) improvements, with a focus on safety and livability. Countermeasures may include sidewalk widening, bulbs, crosswalk upgrades, signal upgrades, accessibility upgrades, a new bikeway, and landscaping.

Start Date End Date

Categorically Exempt

Comments/Concerns

Implement complete street and safety improvements on Leavenworth from McAllister to Post Streets. Countermeasures may include sidewalk widening, bulbs, crosswalk upgrades, signal upgrades, accessibility upgrades, a new bikeway, and landscaping.

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

2020/21

Leavenworth Street from McAllister to Post Streets

Project Information

44-Transportation/Land Use Coordination

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Leavenworth Livable Street

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

22

Page 25: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g1,

350,

000

$

750,

000

$

600,

000

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n-

$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

1,35

0,00

0$

75

0,00

0$

60

0,00

0$

Pe

rcen

t of T

otal

56%

44%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Lin

ePh

ase

Fund

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

Calt

rans

Plan

ning

Gra

ntPl

anni

ng/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Plan

ned

2019

/20

200,

000

$

TBD

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gPl

anne

d20

19/2

040

0,00

0$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ianC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gPl

anne

d20

20/2

175

0,00

0$

375,

000

$

37

5,00

0$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r1,

350,

000

$

-$

-

$

375,

000

$

37

5,00

0$

-

$

-$

Com

men

ts

Leav

enw

orth

Liv

able

Str

eet

Plan

ned

FY 2

019/

2020

Calt

rans

Plan

ning

Gra

nt a

pplic

atio

n. W

e w

ould

con

sider

a re

ques

t for

loca

l mat

ch to

a C

altra

ns P

lanni

ng G

rant

from

the

Prop

K T

rans

port

atio

n/La

nd U

se C

oord

inat

ion

and/

or a

noth

er P

rop

K c

ateg

ory

shou

ld S

FMTA

be

succ

essf

ul in

its g

rant

ap

plic

atio

n. P

er C

altra

ns, e

arlie

st st

art d

ate

is O

ctob

er 2

019.

TBD

sour

ces m

ay in

clud

e A

TP, H

SIP,

AH

SC, o

r new

loca

l rev

enue

sour

ces s

uch

as sa

les t

ax o

r gen

eral

oblig

atio

n bo

nd fu

nds.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i

.e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

23

Page 26: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

District 11

SFPW

Project will build on previous TEP and MuniForward planning efforts on the Mission and Geneva corridors.

Between August 2017 and May 2018, the Mission Street Excelsior Safety Project team held nine one-on-one stakeholder interviews, gathered feedback at four neighborhood group monthly meetings and one PTA meeting, participated in three neighborhood walkthroughs with community groups and residents, represented the project at four Excelsior & Outer Mission Neighborhood Strategy Mobility subgroup meetings and held six meetings with interagency partners. Additionally, the team conducted door-to-door loading surveying between November 2017 and January 2018 and tabled the October 2017 Excelsior Sunday Streets.

Dan Provence

701-4448

[email protected]

Coordinate with the Planning Department-led Outer Mission/Excelsior Strategy to develop feasible plans to improve pedestrian safety and transit reliability on Mission Street from Geneva Avenue to Alemany Boulevard and along Geneva Avenue from Mission Street to Moscow Street. Project will implement pedestrian safety, Muni reliability, and business enhancements based on a robust community engagement process. Potential improvements may include signals, corner bulbs, transit bulbs, boarding islands, spot bike improvements, loading zone/parking changes.

Through near-term and long-term improvements, the project will make it safer and more pleasant to walk, shop, and live along these corridors. This project includes some scope elements previously included in the 14 Mission Outer Mission Muni Forward project.

Categorically Exempt

Improve pedestrian safety and transit reliability on Mission Street from Geneva Avenue to Alemany Boulevard and along Geneva Avenue from Mission Street to Moscow Street. Potential improvements may include signals, corner bulbs, transit bulbs, boarding islands, spot bike improvements, loading zone/parking changes.

https://www.sfmta.com/projects/mission-street-excelsior-safety-project

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

2019/20

Mission Street from Geneva Avenue to Alemany Boulevard and along Geneva Avenue from Mission Street to Moscow Street

Project Information

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Mission Street Excelsior Safety

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

24

Page 27: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 30% In-house and Contracted

Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2017/18 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19

Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 30% In-house and Contracted

Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2017/18 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2018/19

Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2019/20 Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2020/21Advertise Construction

Start Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% In-house and Contracted

Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2021/22

Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2022/23Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2023/24

Planning and PA&ED phases included in single phase for the Cost and Funding Plan.

Start Date End Date

Comments/Concerns

25

Page 28: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g34

7,00

0$

-

$

347,

000

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

2,40

0,00

0$

1,

000,

000

$

1,40

0,00

0$

Con

stru

ctio

n9,

650,

000

$

-$

9,

650,

000

$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

12,3

97,0

00$

1,

000,

000

$

11,3

97,0

00$

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al8%

92%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Lin

ePh

ase

Fund

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

IPIC

- Ba

lboa

Par

kPl

anni

ng/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Allo

cate

dPr

evio

us36

,000

$

Prop

B G

ener

al Fu

ndPl

anni

ng/C

once

ptua

l Eng

inee

ring

Allo

cate

dPr

evio

us20

2,00

0$

Gen

eral

Fund

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gA

lloca

ted

Prev

ious

109,

000

$

Prop

B G

ener

al Fu

ndD

esig

n E

ngin

eerin

g (P

S&E

)Pr

ogra

mm

ed20

19/2

01,

400,

000

$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ianC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Plan

ned

2019

/20

1,00

0,00

0$

50

0,00

0$

500,

000

$

TBD

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

20/2

19,

650,

000

$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r12

,397

,000

$

-

$

500,

000

$

50

0,00

0$

-$

-

$

-$

Com

men

ts

Miss

ion

Stre

et E

xcel

sior S

afet

y

IPIC

- In

tera

genc

y Pl

an Im

plem

enta

tion

Com

mitt

ee (d

evel

opm

ent i

mpa

ct fe

es)

TSIP

- Tr

ansp

orta

tion

and

Stre

et In

fras

truc

ture

Pro

gram

TBD

sour

ces m

ay in

clud

e A

TP, H

SIP,

AH

SC, o

r new

loca

l rev

enue

sour

ces s

uch

as sa

les t

ax o

r gen

eral

oblig

atio

n bo

nd fu

nds.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i

.e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

26

Page 29: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual Engineering 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2019/20Environmental Studies (PA&ED) 0% In-house Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2018/19 Q3-Jan-Feb-Mar 2019/20Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E) 0% In-house Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2019/20 Q2-Oct-Nov-Dec 2020/21Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract) 0% TBD Q1-Jul-Aug-Sep 2021/22Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for Use Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2021/22Project Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

Q4-Apr-May-Jun 2022/23

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

2019/20

Monterey Boulevard between Miramar Avenue and I-280.

Project Information

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Monterey Street Safety Improvements

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

[email protected]

The project will plan, design and construct safety improvements to Monterey Boulevard, which is on the City's High Injury Network and serves as an important bicycle connection. The project will use an extensive community-based planning process to determine context-appropriate safety treatments for the corridor and may include both near-term and long-term recommendations. Improvements installed will respond to specific crash factors on Monterey Boulevard, specifically the portion of Monterey that is on the Vision Zero High Injury Network, and may include paint- and post-based improvements to improve safety for people on bikes and crossing Monterey, as well as curb extensions to reduce crossing distances. Specific improvements will be developed during the planning process.

Start Date End Date

Categorically Exempt

Comments/Concerns

Plan, design and construct safety improvements on Monterey Boulevard from Miramar Avenue to I-280. Monterey Boulevard is on the City's High Injury Network and serves as an important bicycle connection. Improvements will respond to specific crash factors on the corridor and may include paint- and post-based improvements to improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as curb extensions to reduce crossing distances. Specific improvements will be developed during the planning process.

District 07, District 08

TBD

Chava Kronenberg

27

Page 30: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g17

5,00

0$

-

$

175,

000

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

75,0

00$

-

$

75,0

00$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

245,

000

$

245,

000

$

-$

Con

stru

ctio

n1,

550,

000

$

-$

1,

550,

000

$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

2,04

5,00

0$

24

5,00

0$

1,

800,

000

$

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al12

%88

%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Lin

ePh

ase

Fund

Sou

rce

Stat

us

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

TSF

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

gPr

ogra

mm

edPr

evio

us17

5,00

0$

TSF

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

Prog

ram

med

Prev

ious

75,0

00$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ianC

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

Plan

ned

2019

/20

245,

000

$

10

,000

$

23

5,00

0$

TBD

Con

stru

ctio

nPl

anne

d20

21/2

21,

550,

000

$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r2,

045,

000

$

-

$

10,0

00$

235,

000

$

-

$

-$

-

$

Com

men

ts

Mon

tere

y St

reet

Saf

ety

Impr

ovem

ents

TSF

- Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Sust

ainab

ility

Fee

TBD

sour

ces m

ay in

clud

e A

TP, H

SIP

or n

ew lo

cal r

even

ue so

urce

s suc

h as

sale

s tax

or g

ener

al ob

ligat

ion

bond

fund

s.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i

.e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

28

Page 31: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.

Type of Environmental Clearance Required:

Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual EngineeringEnvironmental Studies (PA&ED)Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E)Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract)Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for UseProject Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

TBD

TBD

TBD

Project is placeholder for capital improvements on the San Francisco Vision Zero High Injury Network. The SFMTA will develop individual project allocation requests, with prioritization, scope, outreach, schedule, budget, and a full funding plan prior to support allocation of Prop K funds.

Chava Kronenberg

415.701.4451

[email protected]

Every year about 30 people in San Francisco lose their lives to traffic crashes, and an additional 500 people are severely injured. 61% of these injuries and fatalities occur on 12.8% of San Francisco streets. San Francisco adopted Vision Zero as a policy in 2014 to eliminate traffic fatalities and reduce severe injuries by 2024. Through Vision Zero, San Francisco is committing to build better and safer streets, educate the public on traffic safety, better enforce traffic laws, and adopt policy changes that save lives. Capital investments in pedestrian safety at SFMTA are outlined through the agency’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Planned capital improvements in the CIP focused on pedestrian safety include both programmatic lines for quick and effective capital work and traffic calming programs, as well as corridor projects such as the 6th Street Pedestrian Safety Improvements project and the Folsom-Howard Streetscape Improvements. This programmatic placeholder would likely be used to advance corridor projects.

Start Date End Date

TBD

Comments/Concerns

Programmatic funds for future projects that are key in the City’s focus on Vision Zero, the City’s goal to reduce all traffic deaths to zero by 2024.

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

40-Pedestrian Circulation/Safety

2022/23, 2023/24

TBD

Project Information

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

Vision Zero Improvements Placeholder

San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

29

Page 32: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g-

$

-$

-

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-

$

-$

Righ

t of W

ay-

$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

-

$

-$

Co

nstru

ctio

n2,

000,

000

$

2,00

0,00

0$

-

$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

2,00

0,00

0$

2,

000,

000

$

-$

Pe

rcen

t of T

otal

100%

0%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Line

Phas

eFu

nd S

ourc

e St

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

420

24/2

5

Prop

K40

-Ped

estri

anCi

rcul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Cons

truct

ion

Plan

ned

2022

/23

1,00

0,00

0$

50

0,00

0$

50

0,00

0$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estri

anCi

rcul

atio

n/Sa

fety

Cons

truct

ion

Plan

ned

2023

/24

1,00

0,00

0$

50

0,00

0$

50

0,00

0$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r2,

000,

000

$

-

$

-$

-

$

-$

50

0,00

0$

1,

000,

000

$

50

0,00

0$

Com

men

ts

Visi

on Z

ero

Impr

ovem

ents

Pla

ceho

lder

App

ropr

iate

leve

ragi

ng e

xpec

ted

at ti

me

of a

lloca

tion.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i

.e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

30

Page 33: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Project Information Form

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Line (Primary):

Other EP Line Number/s:

Fiscal Year of Allocation:

Project Location:

Supervisorial District(s):

Project Manager:

Phone Number:

Email:

Brief Project Description for MyStreetSF (80 words max):

Detailed Scope (may attach Word document): Please describe the project goals, scope, benefits and how the project was prioritized. Also, describe any coordination with other projects (e.g. paving, MuniForward, Vision Zero).

Prior Community Engagement/Support (may attach Word document): Please reference any community outreach that has occurred and whether the project is included in any plans (e.g. neighborhood transportation plan, corridor improvement study, station area plans).

Partner Agencies: Please list partner agencies and identify a staff contact at each agency.Type of Environmental Clearance Required:Attachments: Please attach maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, etc. to support understanding of the project.

No

Project Delivery Milestones Status Work

Phase % Complete In-house - Contracted - Both Quarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

Planning/Conceptual EngineeringEnvironmental Studies (PA&ED)Right of WayDesign Engineering (PS&E)Advertise ConstructionStart Construction (i.e. Award Contract)Operations (i.e. paratransit)Open for UseProject Completion (means last eligible expenditure)

Prop K Project Information Form

Prop K Expenditure Plan Information

C. Street & Traffic Safety

38-Traffic Calming

TBD

Project Information

30, 39, 40, 43, 44

iv. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements

NTIP Placeholder

The Transportation Authority's Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) funds community-based neighborhood-scale transportation projects, especially in underserved neighborhoods and areas with vulnerable populations (e.g. seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities). The NTIP program came out of the San Francisco Transportation Plan's needs assessment that identified significant unmet demand for pedestrian and bicycle circulation projects and transit reliability initiatives. The NTIP has two components: a planning component to fund community-based planning efforts in each Supervisorial district ($100,000 for each district over the next 5 years); and a capital component ($600,000 for each district over the next 5 years) to provide local matching funds for about two neighborhood-scale projects in each district in the next five years. This is the second cycle of the NTIP program. This placeholder is for capital funds.

Start Date End Date

TBD

Comments/Concerns

The Transportation Authority's Neighborhood Transportation Improvement Program (NTIP) funds community-based neighborhood-scale transportation projects, especially in underserved neighborhoods and areas with vulnerable populations (e.g. seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities). The NTIP has two components: a planning component to fund community-based planning efforts in each Supervisorial district; and a capital component to provide local matching funds for neighborhood-scale projects in each district. This placeholder is for capital funds.

TBD

TBD

NTIP program is specifically designed to be community-based, with priority given to projects in underserved neighborhoods and areas with vulnerable populations (e.g. seniors, children, and/or people with disabilities).

This is a placeholder. Schedule will be determined once a specific NTIP plan proposal is developed. Sufficient detail will be required when the allocation request is submitted.

31

Page 34: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

San

Fran

cisc

o C

ount

y T

rans

port

atio

n A

utho

rity

Prop

ositi

on K

Sal

es T

ax P

rogr

am P

roje

ct I

nfor

mat

ion

Form

Proj

ect N

ame:

Proj

ect C

ost E

stim

ate

Phas

eC

ost

Prop

KO

ther

Plan

ning

/Con

cept

ual E

ngin

eerin

g-

$

-$

-

$

Env

ironm

enta

l Stu

dies

(PA

&E

D)

-$

-$

-

$

Rig

ht o

f Way

-$

-$

-

$

Des

ign

Eng

inee

ring

(PS&

E)

-$

-$

-

$

Con

stru

ctio

n6,

600,

000

$

6,60

0,00

0$

-

$

Ope

ratio

ns (i

.e. p

arat

rans

it)-

$

-$

-

$

Tot

al P

roje

ct C

ost

6,60

0,00

0$

6,60

0,00

0$

TBD

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al10

0%

Fund

Sou

rce

Prop

K E

xpen

ditu

re

Line

Phas

eFu

nd S

ourc

e St

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear o

f A

lloca

tion

(Pro

gram

min

g Y

ear)

Tot

al F

undi

ngPr

evio

us20

19/2

020

20/2

120

21/2

220

22/2

320

23/2

4

Prop

K30

-Oth

er U

pgra

des t

o M

ajor

Art

eria

lsA

nyPl

anne

d20

19/2

025

0,00

0$

125,

000

$

12

5,00

0$

Prop

K38

-Tra

ffic

Cal

min

gA

nyPl

anne

d20

19/2

02,

850,

000

$

1,42

5,00

0$

1,

425,

000

$

Prop

K39

-Bic

ycle

Circ

ulat

ion/

Safe

tyA

nyPl

anne

d20

19/2

01,

000,

000

$

500,

000

$

50

0,00

0$

Prop

K40

-Ped

estr

ian

Circ

ulat

ion/

Safe

tyA

nyPl

anne

d20

19/2

01,

100,

000

$

550,

000

$

55

0,00

0$

Prop

K43

-Tra

nspo

rtat

ion

Dem

and

Mgm

tA

nyPl

anne

d20

19/2

050

0,00

0$

250,

000

$

25

0,00

0$

Prop

K44

-Tra

nspo

rtat

ion/

Land

Use

Coo

rdin

atio

nA

nyPl

anne

d20

19/2

090

0,00

0$

450,

000

$

45

0,00

0$

Tot

al B

y Fi

scal

Yea

r6,

600,

000

$

-

$

3,30

0,00

0$

3,

300,

000

$

-$

-

$

-$

Com

men

ts

NTI

P Pl

aceh

olde

r

The

NTI

P in

clud

es $

600,

000

for e

ach

supe

rviso

rial d

istric

t ove

r the

nex

t 5 y

ears

to im

plem

ent c

apita

l pro

ject

s. W

hen

NTI

P ca

pita

l pro

ject

s are

iden

tifie

d, th

ey a

re e

xpec

ted

to in

clud

e ap

prop

riate

leve

ragi

ng.

Fund

ing

Sour

ce

Cas

h Fl

ow fo

r Pro

p K

Onl

y (i.

e. F

isca

l Yea

r of R

eim

burs

emen

t)Fu

ndin

g Pl

an -

All

Phas

es

32

Page 35: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

SFM

TA6t

h St

reet

Impr

ovem

ents

(NTI

P)PS

&E

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$7

00,0

00$7

00,0

00SF

MTA

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

CON

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$3

,000

,000

$3,0

00,0

00SF

MTA

7th

Stre

et S

treet

scap

ePS

&E

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$1

74,0

00$1

74,0

00

SFM

TAFo

llow

-the-

Pavi

ng (S

pot I

mpr

ovem

ents

)PS

&E

, CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$5

0,00

0$5

0,00

0

SFM

TAA

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$10,

000

$10,

000

SFM

TAA

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$80,

000

$80,

000

SFM

TAA

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

CON

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$5

94,8

93$5

94,8

93SF

MTA

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

chPS

&E

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$3

00,0

00$3

00,0

00SF

MTA

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

chCO

N

Prog

ram

med

$300

,000

$300

,000

SFM

TAW

alkFi

rst

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$125

,000

$125

,000

SFM

TAW

alkFi

rst

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$325

,000

$325

,000

SFM

TAW

alkFi

rst

CON

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$6

00,0

00$6

00,0

00SF

MTA

Walk

Firs

tPL

AN

/CE

R Pr

ogra

mm

ed$5

3,99

6$5

3,99

6SF

MTA

Walk

Firs

tPS

&E

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$1

10,0

00$1

10,0

00SF

MTA

Walk

Firs

tCO

N

Prog

ram

med

$65,

000

$65,

000

SFM

TA, A

ny

elig

ible

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent

Prog

ram

(NTI

P) p

laceh

olde

rPS

&E

, CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$8

00,0

00$8

00,0

00

SFM

TA, A

ny

elig

ible

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent

Prog

ram

(NTI

P) p

laceh

olde

rPS

&E

, CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$8

00,0

00$8

00,0

00

$6,4

08,8

93

$850

,000

$2

28,9

96

$300

,000

$3

00,0

00

$8,0

87,8

89

$6,4

08,8

93

$850

,000

$2

28,9

96

$300

,000

$3

00,0

00

$8,0

87,8

89

$107

$1

07

$107

$1

07

$107

$1

07

Cum

ulat

ive

Rem

aini

ng P

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acity

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

201

4 St

rate

gic

Plan

City

wid

e Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty &

Circ

ulat

ion

Impr

ovem

ents

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

Corr

idor

Pro

ject

s

Follo

w-th

e-Pa

ving

Age

ncy

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

l

Prog

ram

min

g A

ppro

ved

June

24,

201

4

Prop

K 5

-Yea

r Pro

ject

Lis

t (FY

201

4/15

- 20

18/1

9)Pe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion/

Safe

ty (E

P 40

)

33

Page 36: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

PS&

E

$700

,000

$700

,000

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

CON

$3

0,00

0$1

,500

,000

$1,4

70,0

00$3

,000

,000

7th

Stre

et S

treet

scap

ePS

&E

$1

74,0

00$1

74,0

00

Follo

w-th

e-Pa

ving

(Spo

t Im

prov

emen

ts)

PS&

E, C

ON

$50,

000

$50,

000

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

chPL

AN

/CE

R $1

0,00

0$1

0,00

0A

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

PS&

E

$30,

000

$50,

000

$80,

000

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

chCO

N

$41,

682

$276

,606

$276

,605

$594

,893

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

chPS

&E

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00$3

00,0

00A

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

CON

$1

50,0

00$1

50,0

00$3

00,0

00W

alkFi

rst

PLA

N/C

ER

$125

,000

$125

,000

Walk

Firs

tPS

&E

$1

62,5

00$1

62,5

00$3

25,0

00W

alkFi

rst

CON

$3

00,0

00$3

00,0

00$6

00,0

00W

alkFi

rst

PLA

N/C

ER

$53,

996

$53,

996

Walk

Firs

tPS

&E

$5

5,00

0$5

5,00

0$1

10,0

00W

alkFi

rst

CON

$3

2,50

0$3

2,50

0$6

5,00

0N

eigh

borh

ood

Tran

spor

tatio

n Im

prov

emen

t Pr

ogra

m (N

TIP)

plac

ehol

der

PS&

E, C

ON

$400

,000

$400

,000

$800

,000

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent

Prog

ram

(NTI

P) p

laceh

olde

rPS

&E

, CO

N$4

00,0

00$4

00,0

00$8

00,0

00

$1,7

99,1

82

$3,3

13,1

06

$2,2

88,1

01

$237

,500

$3

00,0

00

$150

,000

$8

,087

,889

$1

,799

,182

$3

,313

,106

$2

,288

,101

$2

37,5

00

$300

,000

$1

50,0

00

$8,0

87,8

89

$107

$1

07

$107

$1

07

$107

$1

07

$107

C

umul

ativ

e R

emai

ning

Cas

h Fl

ow C

apac

ityT

otal

Pro

gram

med

in 2

014

Stra

tegi

c Pl

an

City

wid

e Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty &

Circ

ulat

ion

Impr

ovem

ents

Tot

al C

ash

Flow

in 5

YPP

Corr

idor

Pro

ject

s

Follo

w-th

e-Pa

ving

(Ped

estri

an Im

prov

emen

ts)

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

lPr

ojec

t Nam

ePh

aseCas

h Fl

ow ($

) Max

imum

Ann

ual R

eim

burs

emen

t

Prop

K 5

-Yea

r Pro

ject

Lis

t (FY

201

4/15

- 20

18/1

9)Pe

dest

rian

Circ

ulat

ion/

Safe

ty (E

P 40

)

34

Page 37: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

Cor

ridor

Pro

ject

sSF

MTA

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TA6t

h St

reet

Impr

ovem

ents

(NTI

P)C

ON

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0SF

MTA

6th

Stre

et P

edes

trian

Saf

ety

Impr

ovem

ent

PA&

ED

A

lloca

ted

$2,0

12,0

00$2

,012

,000

SFM

TAW

iggl

e N

eigh

borh

ood

Gre

en C

orrid

or

CO

N

Allo

cate

d$5

72,1

00$5

72,1

00SF

MTA

7th

Stre

et S

treet

scap

ePS

&E

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0

SFM

TAFo

llow

-the-

Pavi

ng (S

pot I

mpr

ovem

ents

)PS

&E

, CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0

SFM

TAA

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

PL

AN

/CE

R Pr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0SF

MTA

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

ch

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAA

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

C

ON

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0SF

PWE

R Ta

ylor

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ool

CO

N

Allo

cate

d$6

,575

$6,5

75SF

PWLo

ngfe

llow

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ool

CO

N

Allo

cate

d$6

4,57

8$6

4,57

8SF

MTA

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

ch

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAA

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

C

ON

Pr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0SF

MTA

Jeff

erso

n St

reet

Impr

ovem

ents

Pha

se 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l] C

ON

A

lloca

ted

$1,4

13,7

40$1

,413

,740

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst

CO

N

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst C

ontin

enta

l Cro

ssw

alks

CO

N

Allo

cate

d$4

23,0

00$4

23,0

00SF

MTA

Wal

kFirs

t Rec

tang

ular

Rap

id F

lash

ing

Beac

ons

PLA

NA

lloca

ted

$17,

100

$17,

100

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst R

ecta

ngul

ar R

apid

Fla

shin

g Be

acon

sPS

&E

Allo

cate

d$4

7,40

0$4

7,40

0SF

MTA

Wal

kFirs

t Rec

tang

ular

Rap

id F

lash

ing

Beac

ons

CO

N

Allo

cate

d$1

58,4

00$1

58,4

00SF

MTA

Gol

den

Gat

e Ro

ad D

iet [

Visi

on Z

ero]

CO

N

Allo

cate

d$1

20,0

00$1

20,0

00

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst P

hase

1 P

edes

trian

Saf

ety

Impl

emen

tatio

n [V

ision

Z

ero]

PS

&E

Allo

cate

d$2

00,0

00$2

00,0

00

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst P

hase

1 P

edes

trian

Saf

ety

Impl

emen

tatio

n [V

ision

Z

ero]

C

ON

Allo

cate

d$8

00,0

00$8

00,0

00

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst P

hase

1 P

edes

trian

Saf

ety

Impl

emen

tatio

n [V

ision

Z

ero]

D

eobl

igat

edD

eobl

igat

ed($

144,

146)

($14

4,14

6)

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst

PLA

N/C

ER

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst

PS&

E

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TAW

alkF

irst

CO

N

Prog

ram

med

$0$0

SFM

TASa

fe S

treet

s Pro

ject

Eva

luat

ion

Prog

ram

PLA

NA

lloca

ted

$130

,150

$130

,150

SFM

TABe

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PL

AN

Allo

cate

d$7

,500

$7,5

00SF

MTA

Bess

ie C

arm

icha

el C

ross

wal

k [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PLA

ND

eobl

igat

ed($

975)

($97

5)SF

MTA

Bess

ie C

arm

icha

el C

ross

wal

k [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

EA

lloca

ted

$6,0

00$6

,000

SFM

TABe

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l] PS

&E

Deo

blig

ated

($2,

205)

($2,

205)

SFM

TABe

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]C

ON

Allo

cate

d$1

4,50

0$1

4,50

0

City

wid

e Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty &

Circ

ulat

ion

Impr

ovem

ents

Follo

w-th

e-Pa

ving

Age

ncy

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

l

Prog

ram

min

g an

d A

lloca

tions

to D

ate

Pend

ing

Nov

embe

r 27,

201

8 Bo

ard

2014

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear P

roje

ct L

ist (

FY 2

014/

15 -

2018

/19)

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

(EP

40)

35

Page 38: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

Age

ncy

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

l

Prog

ram

min

g an

d A

lloca

tions

to D

ate

Pend

ing

Nov

embe

r 27,

201

8 Bo

ard

2014

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear P

roje

ct L

ist (

FY 2

014/

15 -

2018

/19)

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

(EP

40)

SFM

TABe

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]C

ON

Deo

blig

ated

($3,

428)

($3,

428)

SFM

TAC

esar

Cha

vez/

Bays

hore

/Pot

rero

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

[N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PLA

NA

lloca

ted

$50,

000

$50,

000

SFM

TAC

esar

Cha

vez/

Bays

hore

/Pot

rero

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

[N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PLA

ND

eobl

igat

ed($

5,31

4)($

5,31

4)

SFM

TA,

Any

elig

ible

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am

(NTI

P) P

lace

hold

erPS

&E

, CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$0$0

SFPW

Bays

hore

Blv

d/C

esar

Cha

vez

St/P

otre

ro A

ve In

ters

ectio

n (T

he H

airb

all -

Seg

men

ts F

& G

) [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

EA

lloca

ted

$80,

000

$80,

000

SFM

TAE

lk S

treet

at S

usse

x St

reet

Ped

estri

an S

afet

y Im

prov

emen

ts

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

Allo

cate

d$8

0,00

0$8

0,00

0

SFM

TAA

rgue

llo B

oule

vard

Nea

r-te

rm Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

EA

lloca

ted

$10,

520

$10,

520

SFM

TAA

rgue

llo B

oule

vard

Nea

r-te

rm Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

ED

eobl

igat

ed($

10,5

20)

($10

,520

)

SFM

TALo

wer

Gre

at H

ighw

ay P

edes

trian

Impr

ovem

ents

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

Allo

cate

d$7

0,50

0$7

0,50

0

SFM

TALo

wer

Gre

at H

ighw

ay P

edes

trian

Impr

ovem

ents

[NTI

P C

apita

l]C

ON

Allo

cate

d$1

79,5

00$1

79,5

00

SFPW

Ale

man

y In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Phas

e 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PA

&E

DA

lloca

ted

$20,

000

$20,

000

SFPW

Ale

man

y In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Phas

e 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

Allo

cate

d$3

80,0

00$3

80,0

00

SFPW

Bays

hore

Blv

d/C

esar

Cha

vez

St/P

otre

ro A

ve In

ters

ectio

n Im

prov

emen

ts (T

he H

airb

all -

Seg

men

ts F

& G

) [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

CO

NA

lloca

ted

$220

,000

$220

,000

SFM

TA,

Any

elig

ible

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am

(NTI

P) P

lace

hold

erPS

&E

, CO

NPr

ogra

mm

ed$0

$558

,088

$558

,088

$1,8

87,0

53

$2,0

40,0

00

$582

,640

$9

93,5

41

$1,9

71,8

28

$7,4

75,0

62

$6,4

08,8

93

$850

,000

$2

28,9

96

$300

,000

$3

00,0

00

$8,0

87,8

89

$4,8

13,6

22

$3,6

23,6

22

$3,2

69,9

78

$2,5

76,4

36

$904

,608

$9

04,6

08

Boar

d A

ppro

ved

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

Prog

ram

med

Pend

ing

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

201

4 St

rate

gic

Plan

Cum

ulat

ive

Rem

aini

ng P

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acity

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

5Y

PP

36

Page 39: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

Age

ncy

Proj

ect N

ame

Phas

eSt

atus

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

l

Prog

ram

min

g an

d A

lloca

tions

to D

ate

Pend

ing

Nov

embe

r 27,

201

8 Bo

ard

2014

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear P

roje

ct L

ist (

FY 2

014/

15 -

2018

/19)

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

(EP

40)

FOO

TN

OT

ES:

Com

preh

ensiv

e 20

14 5

YPP

Am

endm

ent c

oncu

rren

t with

201

9 5Y

PP a

dopt

ion

(Res

o X

X, a

ppro

ved

YY

Y).

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

: Red

uced

from

$40

0,00

0 to

$0.

Pro

ject

will

adv

ance

in th

e 20

19 5

YPP

for t

he T

raff

ic C

alm

ing

cate

gory

.7t

h St

reet

Stre

etsc

ape:

Red

uced

from

$17

4,00

0 to

$0.

Pro

ject

was

fund

ed th

roug

h no

n-Pr

op K

fund

s. Fo

llow

-the-

Pavi

ng (S

pot I

mpr

ovem

ents

): Re

duce

d $5

0,00

0 to

$0.

Pro

ject

was

fund

ed th

roug

h no

n-Pr

op K

fund

s. W

alkF

irst:

Redu

ced

$228

,996

to $

0. P

roje

ct w

as fu

nded

thro

ugh

non-

Prop

K fu

nds.

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am (N

TIP)

Pla

ceho

lder

: Mov

ed $

558,

088

from

FY

14/

15 a

nd F

Y 1

5/16

to F

Y 1

8/19

, with

cor

resp

ondi

ng c

ash

flow

adj

ustm

ent.

SFM

TA li

kely

to re

ques

t $32

5,00

0 in

FY

18/

19 fo

r con

stru

ctio

n ph

ase

of th

e E

lk S

treet

at S

usse

x St

reet

Ped

estri

an S

afet

y Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital],

fulfi

lling

the

com

mitm

ent t

o al

loca

te a

ppro

ved

by th

e Bo

ard

in N

ovem

ber 2

016.

37

Page 40: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

PS&

E

$0$0

6th

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts (N

TIP)

CO

N

$0$0

$0$0

6th

Stre

et P

edes

trian

Saf

ety

Impr

ovem

ent

PA&

ED

$0$3

65,8

18$7

31,6

36$7

31,6

36$1

82,9

10$2

,012

,000

Wig

gle

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d G

reen

Cor

ridor

C

ON

$3

23,5

00$2

48,6

00$5

72,1

007t

h St

reet

Stre

etsc

ape

PS&

E

$0$0

Follo

w-th

e-Pa

ving

(Spo

t Im

prov

emen

ts)

PS&

E, C

ON

$0$0

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

ch

PLA

N/C

ER

$0$0

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

ch

PS&

E

$0$0

$0A

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

C

ON

$0

$0$0

$0E

R Ta

ylor

Ele

men

tary

Sch

ool S

afe

Rout

es to

Sch

ool

CO

N

$6,5

75$6

,575

Long

fello

w E

lem

enta

ry S

choo

l Saf

e Ro

utes

to S

choo

l C

ON

$1

2,66

3$5

1,91

5$6

4,57

8A

ctiv

e Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Prog

ram

Loc

al M

atch

PS

&E

$0

$0$0

Act

ive

Tran

spor

tatio

n Pr

ogra

m L

ocal

Mat

ch

CO

N

$0$0

$0Je

ffer

son

Stre

et Im

prov

emen

ts P

hase

2 [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

CO

N

$329

,496

$1,0

70,1

67$1

4,07

7$1

,413

,740

Wal

kFirs

t PL

AN

/CE

R $0

$0W

alkF

irst

PS&

E

$0$0

$0W

alkF

irst

CO

N

$0$0

$0W

alkF

irst C

ontin

enta

l Cro

ssw

alks

CO

N

$211

,500

$211

,500

$423

,000

Wal

kFirs

t Rec

tang

ular

Rap

id F

lash

ing

Beac

ons

PLA

N$1

7,10

0$1

7,10

0W

alkF

irst R

ecta

ngul

ar R

apid

Fla

shin

g Be

acon

sPS

&E

$47,

400

$47,

400

Wal

kFirs

t Rec

tang

ular

Rap

id F

lash

ing

Beac

ons

CO

N

$79,

200

$79,

200

$158

,400

Gol

den

Gat

e Ro

ad D

iet [

Visi

on Z

ero]

CO

N

$40,

000

$80,

000

$120

,000

Wal

kFirs

t Pha

se 1

Ped

estri

an S

afet

y Im

plem

enta

tion

[Visi

on

Zer

o]

PS&

E$1

00,0

00$1

00,0

00$2

00,0

00

Wal

kFirs

t Pha

se 1

Ped

estri

an S

afet

y Im

plem

enta

tion

[Visi

on

Zer

o]

CO

N$6

00,0

00$2

00,0

00$8

00,0

00

Wal

kFirs

t Pha

se 1

Ped

estri

an S

afet

y Im

plem

enta

tion

[Visi

on

Zer

o]

Deo

blig

ated

($14

4,14

6)($

144,

146)

Wal

kFirs

tPL

AN

/CE

R $0

$0W

alkF

irst

PS&

E

$0$0

$0W

alkF

irst

CO

N

$0$0

$0Sa

fe S

treet

s Pro

ject

Eva

luat

ion

Prog

ram

PLA

N$1

30,1

50$1

30,1

50Be

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PL

AN

$7,5

00$7

,500

Bess

ie C

arm

icha

el C

ross

wal

k [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PLA

N($

975)

($97

5)Be

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

$6,0

00$6

,000

Bess

ie C

arm

icha

el C

ross

wal

k [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

E($

2,20

5)($

2,20

5)Be

ssie

Car

mic

hael

Cro

ssw

alk

[NTI

P C

apita

l]C

ON

$3,0

00$1

1,50

0$1

4,50

0

City

wid

e Pe

dest

rian

Safe

ty &

Circ

ulat

ion

Impr

ovem

ents

Cor

ridor

Pro

ject

s

Follo

w-th

e-Pa

ving

(Ped

estri

an Im

prov

emen

ts)

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

lPr

ojec

t Nam

ePh

ase

Cas

h Fl

ow ($

) Max

imum

Ann

ual R

eim

burs

emen

tPe

ndin

g N

ovem

ber 2

7, 2

018

Boar

d

2014

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear P

roje

ct L

ist (

FY 2

014/

15 -

2018

/19)

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

(EP

40)

38

Page 41: PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND SAFETY · 2018. 12. 7. · Pedestrian Circulation and Safety category, the Prop K Expenditure Plan assumes that for every $1 of every dollar of sales tax

2014

/15

2015

/16

2016

/17

2017

/18

2018

/19

2019

/20

2020

/21

Fisc

al Y

ear

Tota

lPr

ojec

t Nam

ePh

ase

Cas

h Fl

ow ($

) Max

imum

Ann

ual R

eim

burs

emen

tPe

ndin

g N

ovem

ber 2

7, 2

018

Boar

d

2014

Pro

p K

5-Y

ear P

roje

ct L

ist (

FY 2

014/

15 -

2018

/19)

Pede

stria

n C

ircul

atio

n/Sa

fety

(EP

40)

Bess

ie C

arm

icha

el C

ross

wal

k [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

CO

N($

3,42

8)($

3,42

8)C

esar

Cha

vez/

Bays

hore

/Pot

rero

Inte

rsec

tion

Impr

ovem

ents

[N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PLA

N$1

2,50

0$3

7,50

0$5

0,00

0

Ces

ar C

have

z/Ba

ysho

re/P

otre

ro In

ters

ectio

n Im

prov

emen

ts

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PL

AN

($5,

314)

($5,

314)

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am

(NTI

P) P

lace

hold

erPS

&E

, CO

N$0

$0$0

Bays

hore

Blv

d/C

esar

Cha

vez

St/P

otre

ro A

ve In

ters

ectio

n (T

he H

airb

all -

Seg

men

ts F

& G

) [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

E$4

0,00

0$4

0,00

0$8

0,00

0

Elk

Stre

et a

t Sus

sex

Stre

et P

edes

trian

Saf

ety

Impr

ovem

ents

[N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

E$8

0,00

0$8

0,00

0

Arg

uello

Bou

leva

rd N

ear-

term

Impr

ovem

ents

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

$10,

520

$10,

520

Arg

uello

Bou

leva

rd N

ear-

term

Impr

ovem

ents

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

($10

,520

)($

10,5

20)

Low

er G

reat

Hig

hway

Ped

estri

an Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

PS&

E$4

0,50

0$3

0,00

0$7

0,50

0

Low

er G

reat

Hig

hway

Ped

estri

an Im

prov

emen

ts [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

CO

N$9

0,00

0$8

9,50

0$1

79,5

00

Ale

man

y In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Phas

e 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PA

&E

D$1

0,00

0$1

0,00

0$2

0,00

0

Ale

man

y In

terc

hang

e Im

prov

emen

ts -

Phas

e 2

[NTI

P C

apita

l]PS

&E

$150

,000

$230

,000

$380

,000

Bays

hore

Blv

d/C

esar

Cha

vez

St/P

otre

ro A

ve In

ters

ectio

n Im

prov

emen

ts (T

he H

airb

all -

Seg

men

ts F

& G

) [N

TIP

Cap

ital]

CO

N$2

20,0

00$2

20,0

00

Nei

ghbo

rhoo

d Tr

ansp

orta

tion

Impr

ovem

ent P

rogr

am

(NTI

P) P

lace

hold

erPS

&E

, CO

N$0

$0$1

11,6

18$4

46,4

70$5

58,0

88

$447

,738

$1

,525

,933

$1

,314

,767

$1

,452

,386

$1

,203

,524

$1

,516

,637

$1

4,07

7 $7

,475

,062

$1

,811

,845

$3

,300

,443

$2

,288

,101

$2

37,5

00

$300

,000

$1

50,0

00

$8,0

87,8

89

$1,6

55,8

89

$3,4

30,3

99

$4,4

03,7

32

$3,1

88,8

46

$2,2

85,3

23

$918

,685

$9

04,6

08

$904

,608

Boar

d A

ppro

ved

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

Prog

ram

med

Pend

ing

Allo

catio

n/A

ppro

pria

tion

Tot

al P

rogr

amm

ed in

201

4 St

rate

gic

Plan

Cum

ulat

ive

Rem

aini

ng C

ash

Flow

Cap

acity

Tot

al C

ash

Flow

in 5

YPP

39


Recommended