+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Performance Assessment Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: L0074/Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi 2 Tahun:...

Performance Assessment Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: L0074/Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi 2 Tahun:...

Date post: 28-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: chad-beasley
View: 221 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
21
Performance Assessment Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah : L0074/Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi 2 Tahun : 2008
Transcript

Performance AssessmentPertemuan 9

Matakuliah : L0074/Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi 2Tahun : 2008

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

• Definition a strategic and integrated approach to delivering sustained success to organizations by improving the performance of the people who work in them and by developing the capabilities of teams and individual contributors.

BINA NUSANTARA 2

360 Degree for Performance Management

RATINGS BY :

• Customer Satisfaction• Subordinates rating• Peers rating• Bosses rating• Self rating

360 degree as psychometric

• Using 360 degree especially for customer, peers, and subordinates raters needs necessary statistical tests questionnaires.

• When used ratings it’s like census not a sampling approach because not all customers, peers and subordinates were covered.

PROS ON 360 DEGREE

• Quite cost-effective• Because the area to be judged are made

very explicit to a large number of people, these process also be seen as reinforcing messages about what the organization sees as important.

CONS OF 360 DEGREE• Those undertaking the ratings needs to have

knowledge of the relevant behaviours, & the opportunities to make the necessary observations to supply such knowledge are likely to differ from one rater to the other.

• Organizations rarely provide any training for 360 degree biases such as halo effect.

• Conflict between bosses & peers in giving rating.• People can seen it as “yet another” piece of

bereaucratic administrivia. • People do not have an equal balance all around

subordinate giving ratings to his/her manager.

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT DAY TO DAY – CONTROL & FEEDBACK

• Feedback effective needs to be timely & specific

• Feedback can be seen as positive and negative.

• Feedback can be a daily debrief.

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL• Appraisal have commonly been used with

the purpose of reviewing performance over the previous period and setting some standards and objectives for the future.

• Some people see it as determining pay rises.

• Another definition a tools to evaluate an employee’s performance observable & describable results of that’s person work.

THE TERM OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

• Appraisal (of performance) take place at regular intervals.

• A standardized method is used, on the grounds of previously agreed upon performance criteria/

• Either the employee’s behaviour or outcome of performance is to be evaluated.

• The employee is evaluated by the next higher-ranking superior, equally ranking colleagues, other coworkers or makes a self-appraisal.

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS

BINA NUSANTARA 10

As needed

Annually

Daily

Step 1. Determine the reason for evaluating Employee Performance

• Determining Salary Increases• Making Promotion Decisions• Providing Employee Training and Feedback• Making Terminations Decisions• Conducting Personnel Research

BINA NUSANTARA 11

Step 2. Identify Environmental and Cultural Limitations

• Because it could affect the system, e.g.

supervisors are highly overworked, an elaborate, time-consuming performance appraisal system will not be successful

BINA NUSANTARA 12

Step 3. Determine who will evaluate performance

• Supervisors• Peers• Subordinates• Customers• Self-Appraisal

BINA NUSANTARA 13

Step 4. Select the Best Appraisal Methods to Accomplish Your Goals

Decision 1 : Focus of the Appraisal Dimensions- Trait-Focused Performance Dimensions- Competency-Focused Performance Dimensions- Task-Focused Performance Dimensions- Goal-Focused Performance Dimensions- Contextual Performance

BINA NUSANTARA 14

• Decision 2 : Should Dimensions Be Weighted? which one more important than other.

• Decision 3 : Use of Employee Comparisons, Objective Measures, or Ratings- Employee Comparisons rank order- Objective Measures quantity of work,quality of work, attendance, safety. - Rating of performance graphic rating scale, behavioral checklists, Comparison with other Employee, frequency of desired behaviors, extent to which organizational expectations are met.

BINA NUSANTARA 15

Step 5. Train Raters

• Because few organizations spend the time and resources necessary to do this properly.

• Raters that have been trained become aware of the various rating errors and how to avoid them often increase accuracy, and increases employee satisfaction with the ratings.

BINA NUSANTARA 16

Step 6. Observe and Document Performance

• Document Critical Incidents as they occur. Critical Incidents are examples of excellence and poor employee performance.

• Should be communicated to the employee at the time they occur.

BINA NUSANTARA 17

Step 7. Evaluate Performance

• Obtaining & Reviewing Objective Data• Reading Critical – Incident Logs• Completing the Rating Form

BINA NUSANTARA 18

Step 8. Communicate Appraisal Results to Employee

• Prior to the interview - Allocating time- Scheduling the interview- Preparing for the interview

• During the InterviewIt’s a good idea to begin with some small talk.

BINA NUSANTARA 19

Step 9. Terminate Employee

• Legal aspect will be different for every country Hukum Tenaga Kerja Indonesia

BINA NUSANTARA 20

BINA NUSANTARA 21

THE END


Recommended