+ All Categories
Home > Documents > PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of...

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of...

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: mary-sullivan
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
16
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West a , M. Groth b , A.W. Hyatt a , G.L. Jackson a , M.R. Wade a And the DIII-D Team a General Atomics b LLNL Presented at the DSOL ITPA Meeting Toronto November, 2006
Transcript
Page 1: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FORPIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION

Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization

W.P. Westa, M. Grothb, A.W. Hyatta, G.L. Jacksona, M.R. Wadea

And the DIII-D Team aGeneral Atomics

b LLNL

Presented at theDSOL ITPA Meeting

Toronto

November, 2006

Page 2: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Motivation: Reduce frequency of boronizations

• Each boronization cost manpower and run time – ~ 1 full day of plasma operation required to desorb embedded

helium from a fresh BZN film– Several person-days of engineer/technician time required

• Long pulse, high duty cycle, superconducting devices not amenable to frequent boronizations – Previous typical plasma-time between BZNs on DIII-D ~ 103 s.– On next generation tokamaks (East, K-Star, ITER) this is the order

of a fresh BZN between every (or a few) discharge.

• Advent of strong divertor pumping on DIII-D leads to indications that mean time between boronizations might be extended– BZN/3 weeks was like an apple a day– Little or no effects on plasma ops if a BZN was skipped.

Page 3: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Tools for evaluating need for BZN

• A daily reference shot (DRS) was devised to monitor long term changes in parameters that reflect wall conditions.– Spectroscopy

• Impurity influx/content• Zeff, Radiaited Power

– Gas Balance Measurements• Fueling• Exhaust• Recycling• Density Rise/Loss

• High performance discharges were repeated after a long campaign without BZN. – Fusion Gain (N*H89/q95

2)

– H89

– Neutron production

Page 4: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Daily reference shot (DRS) provides relevant data under consistent operating conditions

• Shot taken as first shot each morning– Also serves as a check on beam duct conditioning

• High LSN shape compatible with most commonly used f-coil patch panels – Not compatible with USN patch panel=>skip those

days• Three phases in shot

– L-mode during rampup and early flat-top– Slow beam power ramp until an L-H transition is

followed by an ELM-free period– Final period of increased beam power to induce

ELMing H-mode phase.• A total of 40 usable shots obtained over a 3

month operating period.

Page 5: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

DRS L-mode database indicates a minor upward trend in core impurities

• Edge lines indicate no long term trend in influx at midplane

• CVI CX and NiXXV lines indicate some upward trend in core impurities

• Visible Bremsstrahung and O VIII CX show no long term trend

6800 Plasma-seconds between BZN events

Page 6: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

DRS H-mode database shows no clear trend in edge or core impurities

• Edge lines indicate no long term trend in influx at midplane

• CVI CX and NiXXV lines: possible slight upward trend in core impurities

• Visible Bremsstrahung and O VIII CX show no long term trend

Page 7: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Advanced tokamak (AT) and hybrid discharges show no degradation in performance across 2006 campaign

• High performance hybrid and AT discharges were occasionally repeated throughout campaign.

• Discharges repeated just before and after last BZN.

• Just before last BZN, seven strongly-pumped hybrid discharges were sequentially repeated without helium glow discharge cleaning between each discharge.

• No degradation in performance (H89, G=NH89/q95

2, neutron production) was observed.

• Hybrid discharges were very repeatable without between shot helium glow.

Page 8: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Up to 5800 plasma-seconds since last BZN, AT discharges keep on performing

• Shot 126472 taken after 5800 plasma.seconds of operation

– 122 major disruptions since BZN on June 10th

• Shot 126763 taken after 320 plasma.seconds of operation

– Taken after BZN on September 16

• Performance very repeatable

Page 9: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

AT fusion gain, carbon fraction, and neutron production constant across campaign

• These high AT discharges extrapolate well to the ITER Q=5 steady state scenario

• Nickel, a very minor player in contamination, increases with total operation time after BZN

Page 10: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Hybrid performance constant over several discharges with no between shot helium glow

• These performance levels are typical of hybrid shots throughout the 2006 campaign.

• Strong pumping is key to maintaining good graphite wall conditions (R. Maingi, et al., Fusion 36, (1996) 245)

Page 11: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Discussion: High performance more robust with graphite walls compared to high Z metal walls

• Tokamaks with metal walls require routine BZN for high performance– C-MOD with molybdenum walls (Lipschultz, PSI 2006)– AUG with mostly tungsten walls (Neu and Kallenbach, PSI

2006, Hefei)– Both cases routine boronizations are required to reduce high

Z contamination and associated high radiated power in attempts to produce high performance discharges.

• DIII-D used mostly beam heating, C-Mod mostly RF heating– On C-Mod parasitic effects of RF power used for plasma

heating is found to be a source of plasma contamination by Mo.

– On AUG, similar effects are seen, yet central RF heating also has been used to reduce W contamination of the core plasma.

Page 12: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Conclusions

• In DIII-D with an all graphite wall and strong divertor pumping capability, we have demonstrated the ability to reproduce ITER relevant high-performance discharges over 6000 plasma-seconds of operation with no intervening boronizations or bakes.

• Over a short period (~ 50 plasma-seconds) the ability to maintain hybrid operation without between shot helium glow discharge cleaning has been demonstrated.

• Multi-phase daily reference shots are useful in assessing long term trends in wall outgassing/pumping and wall impurity sources.

Page 13: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

DRS provides data on wall release of deuterium and impurity line emission

• More wall release means less gas input needed to reach programed density

• More wall release tends to increase dne/dt in ELM free phase and increase density at first ELM

• More wall release tends to increase pumping plenum pressure early in shot

Page 14: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

DRS wall source indicators shown no strong trend throughout 2006 campaign

• Net density rise and peak rate of rise constant across campaign

• Caveat: Particle balance may be dominated by large gas input during l-mode phase

• ELMing H-mode radiated power and PRAD relatively constant throughout campaign

Page 15: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Hybrid performance constant throughout campaign and without between shot glow

N, H89, and fusion gain maintained over 5800 plasma seconds without BZN

• Performance and density maintained over seven sequential shots with no between shot helium glow conditioning

Page 16: PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Long term monitoring of DIII-D wall conditions following a boronization W.P. West.

Spectroscopic and performance data from many shots used to assess effect of wall conditions

• Data from every plasma shot has a lot of scatter– 1600 discharges (8000 plasma-seconds) with a wide

variety of operating parameters

• Daily reference shot data shows specific long term trends under well controlled conditions– 40 discharges with repeated operating parameters

• Reproduction of specific high performance discharges – Advanced tokamak and hybrid discharges with high N

and high H-factor chosen for demonstration.

• 3 months, ~1400 discharges, 6800 plasma-seconds between BZNs.


Recommended