Date post: | 25-May-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | ernesto-linares |
View: | 208 times |
Download: | 1 times |
8th Annual AndeanConference 2014-
Larrain Vial
Worldwide Fishing Industry
World �sh supply
3
Usage of world �sh supply
In the last 30 years, aquaculture has grown at an annual rate of ~8%, covering 40% of the �sh supply as of 2011.
Fish consumption is expected to continue growing given global trends towards healthier eating and increasing demand from developing markets.Wild catch levels are virtually stagnant due to conservation of biomass resources.
Million MT
+ 35%
+ 1,097%
180160140120100
80604020
0
1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011
Aquaculture
Wild catch
Million MT140
120
100
80
60
40
20
02000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Fresh
Cured
Frozen
Canning
+ 49%+ 14%
+ 48%
+ 27%
Source: FAO
Fish oil main usage
Aquaculture �shmeal consumers
Fishmeal main usage
Indirect Human Consumption
4
Aquaculture is the primary end use of �shmeal and �sh oil, representing 68% and 78% of total production in 2011.
Fishmeal and �sh oil are highly demanded in aquaculture due to its high conversion factors, better immunity levels and adequate digestibility, reasons why they can not be substituted totally.Signi�cant demand for piglets in China swine production and increasing demand of �sh oil for Omega 3 extracts.
100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%
0%1960 1980 2008 2009 2010 2011
Others
Pig
Chicken
Aquaculture
5% 8%
65% 63% 68%73%
100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%
0%1970 1990 2009 2010 2011
Industrial
Others
Aquafeed
20%10%
80% 70%78%
Shrimp
Salmonids
Marine Fish
Others
27% 30%
21%22%
Shrimp
Salmonids
Marine Fish
Others
27% 30%
21%22%
Source: FAO, IFFO
Indirect Human Consumption
Fishmeal and Fish Oil prices
5
Limited supply and increasing demand has led to a gradual increase in �shmeal and �sh oil prices.
The price depends on the following factors: Total amount of �shmeal produced. Quality of the �shmeal which is a function of the quantity of protein (TVN) and the freshness of the anchovy (histamine).The increase of �shmeal prices is mainly driven by: Low grade of substitution. Increasing demand and �at supply: restrictions on the amount allowed to be �shed of anchovies.
US$ / MTFish oilFishmeal2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
19941995
19961997
19981999
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20082009
20102011
20122013
2014 (*)
(*) Data as of February 2014. Source: IFFO.
Suitable environment for anchovy due to the convergence of “Humboldt” and “El Niño” currents.Length of the coast with more than 2,000 km.
Local unloading of �sh resources
Indirect Human Consumption
6
Perú: historical presence of �sh resources. Favorable macroeconomic fundamentals and unique geographic aspects.
Source: PRODUCE
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Thousand MT
19941995
19961997
19981999
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20082009
20102011
20122013
Indirect Human Consumption
Local unloading of IHC resources
7
Perú: important development of Indirect Human Consumption. Anchovy: only authorized resource for IHC industry, with high protein levels.
Peruvian anchovy has signi�cant advantages over other species: Not a migratory �sh. Short development: reproduction cycle of 6 months. Close presence to the coast.
Source: PRODUCE
14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Thousand MT
19941995
19961997
19981999
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20082009
20102011
20122013
Perú: �rst producer of �shmeal in the world. Year 2011: 30%. Perú, �rst exporter of �shmeal in the world. Year 2011: 41%. Opportunity to generate added value.
World �shmeal production (2012) World �shmeal exports (2012)
Perú: leading producer & exporter
8
Leading producer & exporter of �shmeal and �sh oil. Due to low presence of aquaculture in Perú, production is oriented to international market.
Source: IFFO.
Peru
China
Thailand
Chile
USA
Others
42%
18%
12%
11%
11%6%
Peru
Chile
Denmark
USA
Iceland
Others
32%43%
4%5%
6% 10%
Perú: leading producer & exporter
Historical permited �shing days
9
E�ective regulatory system: Individual Fishing Quotas (ITQ), leads the industry to focus on quality and e�cient usage of �eet and plants.
Before - Global Quota System (“Olympic Race”): Competition between participants. Focus was on increasing speed. Ine�cient operations and reduced quality of �shmeal and �sh oil. Environmental contamination. Short �shing season.
Since 2009- Individual Transferable Quota System: Individual quota assigned by vessel. Overall �eet reduction (1,200 to 500). Lower �xed costs. Extension of the �shing season. Better planning of production and diversi�cation. E�ciency and better quality.
ITQ
OlympicRace
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
227200
175147
105
48 47 49
179
128
174 161 157
Pesquera Exalmar S.A.A.
Pesquera Exalmar S.A.A.
11
Leading competitive position with signi�cant diversi�cation potential.
More than 30 years in the industry.
Diversi�cation in Direct Human Consumption (DHC).
Plants strategically located throughout the Peruvian coast, with 6 processing plants, 2 frozen plants and 1 unloading line.
21 vessels in operation with 7,181 m3 storage capacity and 6 with Refrigerated Sea Water “RSW” (2,600 m3) also used for DHC.
Certi�cations include GMP B2, IFFO, BASC and OHSAS 18001. For 2014: ISO 14001 and BRC.
N-CS
Pesquera Exalmar S.A.A.
12
1992-1999 2000-2008 2009 2010 2011-2013
Revenues 1998:US$ 19.5 mm
Revenues 2008:US$ 117 mm
Revenues 2009:US$ 128 mm
Revenues 2010:US$ 183 mm
Revenues 2012:US$ 217 mm
Investments in Plantsand vessels
IPO and additionalquota acquisition
Higher ITQ and DirectHuman ConsumptionSound �nancial strategy ITQ system adjustment
Acquisition of processing plants: 1992 Casma 1995 Tambo de Mora 1997 Huacho 1999 Chicama.Building of new vessels
2004: issuance of short term notes in Peru.2007: Private Equity takes 22.7% stake in the company. 2008: Syndicated loan (USD 80MM).
Fix cost reduction: only 14 vessels operate the �rst year of ITQ.Investments in Direct Human Consumption.
Listing on Lima Stock Exchange with capital injection of US$ 100MM.Acquisition of additional quotas reaching 6.45% of north center area and 4.34% in the south area. Strengthen Direct Human consumption (DHC).RSW system to 6 vessels.
2011: Syndicated loan US$ 140 MM2012: New DHC Plant in Paita.
2013: New DHC Plant in Tambo de Mora. All �shmeal plants with Steam dried system. Bonds issuance of US$ 200 MM (January 2013)
Indirect Human Consumption
13
Continuous improvement and solid presence in the IHC segment. Close relationship with independent vessel owners.
6 plants with 434 MT/hour of total installed capacity, strategically located along Peruvian coast.
All plants operate with Steam Dried System.
Overall improvement of �shmeal quality.
21 operating vessels with an assigned quota of 6.45% in the North-Center region and 4.34% in the South region.
The Company exports substantially all of the produced �shmeal to investment grade countries.
Exalmar’s ability to buy third party catch allows the Company to: Increase its share of production beyond assigned quota. Make better use of facilities. Generate a higher total EBITDA. Reduce �xed costs.
Indirect Human Consumption
14
Fishmeal exports (*)
Historical processing (North-Center)
Fish oil exports (*)
China
Indonesia
Taiwan
Chile
Vietnam
Others76%
8%
4%3%3% 6%
Denmark
Chile
Norway
Japan
China
32%
3%
62%
2005
700600500400300100200
02006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Own catch (%) Third party (%)
392
271328
372
523
364
622
397466
40%
47%35%
26%45%
43%
45%
39%45%
60%53% 65% 74% 55%
57%55% 61% 55%
(*) Data as of December 2013.
Own catch (North-Center)
Conversion factor for �shmeal
Plants capacity
Production (Thousand MT)
Operations
15
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
5
-2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
234
144212
276 287
177
339
240269
2.70% 2.40%
3.50%4.50%
4.90%
5.70%6.45%
6.45%
6.45%Catch (Thousand MT)Exalmar's Catch / Global Catch
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
23.3%
22.6%22.5%
22.8%22.8%
23.4%23.2%
22.8% 22.8%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
106
17
74
17
92
12
61
1391
21
83
18
85
19144
31
119
25
Fishmeal Fish oil
Name Capacity IHC(MT/hr)
Total 434
10
100
90
84
50
100
Capacity DHC(MT/day)
683
108
575
Paita
Chicama
Chimbote
Huacho
Callao
Tambo de Mora
North-Center Quota
Global Quota North-Center
16
Exalmar: 3rd largest producer of �shmeal and �sh oil in Peru in terms of volume, supplementing its quota via third-party catch from independent �shermen.
Company 1st season 2013
14.10%
10.76%
8.50%
6.86%
6.51%
6.45%
6.21%
40.61%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 Others
2nd season 2013
14.10%
10.76%
8.50%
6.86%
6.51%
6.45%
6.21%
40.61%
% of Total ProcessedCompany 1st season 2013
22.71%
15.24%
10.83%
10.55%
10.24%
9.72%
7.57%
13.11%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2nd season 2013
23.77%
16.16%
11.83%
9.85%
8.25%
8.70%
7.35%
14.09%Others
Anchovy individual �shing quota: 6.45% in North- Centre and 4.34% in the South.Independent �sherman typically sell their assigned quota to larger companies. Exalmar’s ability to buy third party catch allows it to increase its share of national production. Strong business relationship with independent vessel owners: (i) Providing �nancial and operational advisory, (ii) O�ering onshore and o�shore �shing logistical support, (iii) Structuring tailor-made anchovy purchase agreements.
Source: Produce. Source: Produce.
Exalmar’s own and third parties catch
Global Quota North-Center
17
Thousand MT2nd season
20111st season
2012Total
As of December 2012
Global Quota
E�ective catch
E�ective catch/Quota (%)
Exalmar’s catchparticipation
Season
2,500
2,448
97.9%
11.6%
23/11-31/01
2,700
2,623
97.1%
10.6%
02/05 - 31/07
5,200
5,071
97.5%
2nd season2012
1st season2013
Total
As of December 2013
810
732
90.4%
11.2%
22/11-31/01
2,050
1,993
97.2%
10.8%
17/05-31/07
2,860
2,725
95.3%
2012
Thousand MT
Thirdparties
2013
396.7
466.4
156.2
240.5
197.8
268.6 Owncatch
E�ective catch of 2013 (2,725 thousand MT) represents 53.7% of 2012 (5,071 thousand MT).The quota of 2nd season 2013 (2,304 thousand MT) allowed an increase of production on November and December 2013.
2nd season 2013: E�ective catch: 98.7%. Exalmar’s participation: 11.7%.
Direct Human Consumption
18
Consolidating its presence in DHC segment.
Development of new products lines: fresh and frozen �sh.
Constant monitoring of the world market trends to diversify o�er and generate products with increased added value.
Extension of relationship with independent �shermen.
Development of social responsibility projects to promote the adequate use of marine resources.
Public bidding for tuna quota: Exalmar awarded part of lot 1, corresponding to 739.94 m3.
Mahi Mahi Mackerel Jack Mackerel Giant Squid
Mackerel and Jack Mackerel
19
On February 6th 2014, Exalmar obtained the de�nitive license to operate the frozen plant of Tambo de Mora.
Also, on February 27th obtained the �nal authorization to operate three more mackerel and jack mackerel �shing vessels for Direct Human Consumption.
Mackerel andJack Mackarel
2011
Total 434
Global quota C-N
E�ective catch
Exalmar’s catch
Exalmar’s catchparticipation
240,000
233,660
9,270
4.0%
2012
434
160,000
112,310
6,777
6.0%
2013
434
106,000
60,329
3,941
6.5%
2014 (*)
434
152,000
-
-
-
(*) Season started on January 16th andwill �nished on December 31st.
Paita plant (other species)
20
2012
Paita Plant Production
MT
2013
3,425
6,082
Giant squid
Mahi mahi
Squid
Anchovy
Scallops84%
13%
3%
87%
4%3%
4% 2%
Production 2012 Production 2013
Financial Performance
Revenues were a�ected by lower beginning stocks and lower production, higher prices and more DHC revenues.Gross margin was a�ected by lower revenues and higher ban expenses.Net income a�ected by lower quota and higher �nancial expenses.
P&L Composition
22
Millions of US$ 2012 2013 Var %
Revenues
Gross Pro�t
Operating Income
Pre-Tax Income
Net Income
EBITDA
% of revenues
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Income Margin
EBITDA Margin
$217.0
$58.6
$34.8
$27.3
$21.2
$60.6
27%
16%
10%
28%
$168.9
$40.9
$21.0
($4.8)
$0.7
$41.6
24%
12%
0%
25%
-22%
-30%
-40%
-31%
Revenues Composition
23
Revenues 2012 Revenues 2013
2012
Fishmeal Fish oil Anchovy DHC
US$ MM
2013
158129
4323 6 10 15
2
Fish meal
Fish oil
Anchovy
DHC
20%
4%
73%
14%
9%
76%
IHC Revenues: Fishmeal & Fish Oil
24
60,000
45,000
30,000
15,000
0
1,000
1,750
1,500
1,250
1,000
Q111Q211
Q311Q411
Q112Q212
Q312Q412
Q113Q213
Q313Q413
Volume Average Sales Price (US$/MT)Fishmeal
14,000
10,500
7,000
3,500
0
2,500
2,100
1,700
1,300
900
Q111Q211
Q311Q411
Q112Q212
Q312Q412
Q113Q213
Q313Q413
Fish oil (*)Volume Average Sales Price (US$/MT)
ThousandsMT
2012
Fish oil Revenues
MT
US$/MT
Fish OilRevenues(US$)
28,264
1,532
$43,302
11,628
1,979
$23,008
2013
ThousandsMT
2012
Fishmeal Revenues
MT
US$/MT
FishmealRevenues(US$)
120,226
1,315
$158,155
79,903
1,616
$129,103
2013
(*) Fish oil considers also low quality production surplus.
Fishmeal and Fish Oil Stocks & Sales
25
Thousands MT 2012
Fishmeal
2013 Var.
Begininng stock
Production
Sales
Reprocessing
Ending stock
40.6
90.6
120.2
0.1
11.1
11.1
106.2
79.9
1.3
38.7
-73%
17%
-34%
249%
Thousands MT 2012
Fish oil
2013 Var.
Begininng stock
Production
Sales
Reprocessing
Ending stock
80.2
21.4
28.3
0.1
1.4
1.0
17.1
11.6
-0.0
6.5
-88%
-20%
-59%
360%
2012Production Sales
Thousand MT
2013
90.6106.2 120.2
79.9
2012Production Sales
Thousand MT
2013
21.4 17.1
28.3
11.6
DHC Revenues
26
Frozen
Fresh
Others
12%
83%
9%
88%
2012
US$ MM
2013
9,676
14,991
DHC Revenues 2012 DHC Revenues 2013
Increase in revenues of 55%, explained by the higher production of Paita Plant (+78%).
Cost of Production
27
2012 2013 Var %
Ban days
Total Processed(*)
Own Catch*
Third Party*
Third parties buying price**
Catch Cost(**)
Cash Catch Cost(**)
Processing Cost (***)
Cash Processing Cost (***)
Ban Expenses (US$MM)
204
397
241
156
318
88
78
216
196
27
208
466
269
198
299
110
96
230
195
27
2%
18%
12%
27%
-6%
25%
23%
7%
-1%
-1%
Ban &Processed
Volume
Costs
It was recorded 208 ban days, which re�ected in higher ban expenses (16% of revenues vs. 12% of 2012).
Increase of fuel and personal costs led to higher catch cost (+23%).
Higher volume from third parties a�ected the third parties buying price (-6%).
(*) Thousand MT. (**) US$/MT of anchovy. (***) US$/MT Fishmeal & Fish Oil
Gross Profit and Net Income
28
Net Income a�ected by: Lower quota. Higher �nancial expenses (bonds issuance in January 2013).
2012
Cost of Sales Ban Expenses Gross Margin
2013
60%
12%
27%
60%
16%
24%
2012
Gross margin Operatingmargin
Net Incomemargin
EBITDA margin
US$ MM2013
27%24%
16%12%
0%10% 28% 25%
Gross pro�t was a�ected by: Lower revenues (-22%). Higher ban expenses (16% of revenues vs. 12% of 2012) and non production costs of DHC (+1.2 US$ MM).
Company debt
29
Issuance: US$ 200 MM in the international capital market.
Issue Date: February 1st, 2013.
Maturity Date: January 31st, 2020.
Interest: 7.375% per annum.
Use of proceedings: repay the syndicated loan (US$ 140 MM), while balance will be used for several company investments.
Active Leasing operations funding for Freezing Plant (DHC).
BondsDebt (Million US$)
56
207
264
7
Short term debt
Long term debt
Total debt
Cash
Net debt 257
2012
Net Financial Expenses
US$ MM
2013
9.4
26.8
CAPEX
30
IHC Investments: Maintenance work on �shing nets. Environmental requirements. Fishmeal plants.
DHC Investments: Tambo de Mora Plant. Paita Plant. RSW Vessels for DHC.
CAPEX composition 2013
IHC Plants
Vessels
Administratives
DHC Plants
45%
35%
15%5%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
41.5
5.2 5.2
16.520.3
12.8 14.2
27.8
44.4
US$ MM
T. (511) 441.4420F. (511) 441.4643W. www.exalmar.com.peD. Av. Victor Andrés Belaunde 210, San Isidro, Lima Perú