+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Date post: 31-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: melvin-welch
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
50
Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011 www.pas.gov.uk
Transcript
Page 1: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Planning reform and localism

Date: November 2011 www.pas.gov.uk

Page 2: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

This session

• Planning basics

• Localism and planning - context and background to changes

• Neighbourhood planning and the draft National Planning Policy Framework

• Discussions

Page 3: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.
Page 4: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.
Page 5: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Planning…..

• Sets out a long term vision for a place• Provides a framework for making decisions• Balances competing uses of land in the public

interest • Balances social, economic and environmental

priorities • Delivers change on the ground• Mechanism for people to get involved

Page 6: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

On the other hand

• A barrier to growth

• Red tape

• Costly

• Complicated

• Takes too long

• Inaccessible to people

• Adversarial

Page 7: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Planning can be difficult

• People love their places. You love your place

• Planning can involve difficult choices = unpopular decisions

• Involves many areas of knowledge, frequently changing

Page 8: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

But good planning

• Is proactive – helps manage change

• Helps make good places

• Is responsive to a changing society

• Involves people

• Helps deliver on corporate objectives

• Brings in investment

Page 9: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

A councillor has a role in…..

• Sets out a long term vision for a place• Provides a framework for making decisions• Balances competing uses of land in the public

interest • Balances social, economic and environmental

priorities • Delivers change on the ground• Mechanism for people to get involved

As defined locally and nationally

Page 10: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

A ward councillor’s role…..

• understand and get involved in the local plan

• support residents and businesses to get involved in planning

• liaise with officers on planning in your ward

• get involved with neighbourhood planning

• share your residents views on planning issues with officers and councillors

• get involved with the business community

Page 11: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Localism and planning reform

Page 12: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

ChangesPre-determination rules…. Neighbourhood Planning…. Local Referenda…. Neighbourhood Development Orders…. Community Infrastructure Levy…. Community Right to Build…. Pre-Application Consultation… Financial Considerations…. Plan for Growth.…Duty to Co-operate… .New Homes Bonus…. National Planning Policy Framework….Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development…. Local Plans…. Local Development Orders…. Use Classes Order…. Local Enterprise Partnerships…Enterprise Zones…Planning Fees…12 month guarantee….Enforcement

Page 13: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

The principles

• Growth and efficiency • Streamline and speed up• Less prescription and regulation• Community empowerment • Incentivisation

Page 14: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Localism and planning reform - context

• Open Source Planning• Budget • Plan for Growth • Localism Bill• National Planning Policy

Framework

Page 15: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Planning framework

• National policy• (Regional Spatial

Strategies)

• Local policy (including optional neighbourhood plans)

• Planning decisions

Page 16: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

The Planning Reform Agenda

Community Right to Build

Neighbourhood Plans Local Plans

National Policy

Incentives Planning decisions

Page 17: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

In Greg Clark’s eyes

When people know that they will get proper support to cope with the demands of new development; when they have a proper say over what new homes will look like; and when they can influence where those homes go, they have reasons to say “yes” to growth.”

Page 18: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

In the eyes of residents

• Localism- we’re in charge – ‘no development’

• Neighbourhood plans – it’s official, we can write it down - ‘no development’

• NPPF –oh no, development everywhere

Page 19: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Incentives

• Financial– New Homes Bonus– Community Infrastructure Levy– Material consideration

• Other– Influence– ownership

Page 20: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

The end of…….?

Page 21: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

And more of this

Page 22: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

And more of this

Page 23: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

All adding up to

• More housing and economic growth, happy people, happy developers

Page 24: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Housing

A YouGov survey commissioned by the New Homes Marketing Board has revealed that more than eight in ten people (81 per cent ) believe Britain needs more housing for sale and rent, especially affordable homes for first-time buyers.

It also shows that far fewer - just 50 per cent - would welcome more homes of all types in their own immediate neighbourhoods.

Buildingtalk 22nd March 2011

Page 25: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Discussion……

• How will ‘localism’ play out in your area?

• Do you see trouble ahead?

• Where are the areas of agreement?

Page 26: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Neighbourhood planning

Page 27: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Neighbourhood planning

“It is not merely landowners in the area who are affected or even business interests. Too often in the past the objections of a noisy minority have been allowed to drown the voices of other people vitally affected. These too must have their say, and when they have had it, the provisional plan may need a good deal of alteration, but it will be all the better for that since it will reflect actual needs democratically expressed. In the past, plans have been too much the plans of officials and not the plans of individuals, but I hope we are going to stop that.”

Page 28: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Neighbourhood planning

“It is not merely landowners in the area who are affected or even business interests. Too often in the past the objections of a noisy minority have been allowed to drown the voices of other people vitally affected. These too must have their say, and when they have had it, the provisional plan may need a good deal of alteration, but it will be all the better for that since it will reflect actual needs democratically expressed. In the past, plans have been too much the plans of officials and not the plans of individuals, but I hope we are going to stop that.”

Rt.Hon. Lewis Silkin, MP (1947)

Page 29: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

From the National Planning Policy Framework

• Neighbourhoods should….

• develop plans that support the strategic development needs….including policies for housing and economic development

• Plan positively…power to promote more development than …in local plan

• Draft NPPF July 2011

Page 30: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Neighbourhood planning aims

• Empower communities• Neighbourhood led• Light-touch but robust• Flexible - inspire innovation and creativity• Pro-growth - exploring ways of enabling community

supported development• Critical role for local plan in setting strategic context• New basis for partnership work with local authority

Page 31: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

A community applies for a neighbourhood area to be designated

Work up details with the community and

Consult statutory consultees as appropriate

If no parish or town council, a neighbourhood forum is designated

Submit proposals to the local authority

Independent Examination

Local authority checks proposals

Community referendum

Make a plan or order

If there is a parish or town council, they take the lead

The local authority can help here

A simple majority is required here

LPA to advise on conformity with Local Plan and when/which statutory consultees to involve

Page 32: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

The basic conditions

• They most have appropriate regard to national policy

• They must conform to the strategic elements of the local plan

• They must be compatible with EU obligations

• And compatible with human rights obligations

Page 33: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Front runner issues

• Housing: – growth (how much and where)– bringing empty/inadequate homes back into use– affordable housing provision– retirement village– self build

Page 34: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Front runner issues

• Inner city development pressures • Town centres• Preserving the character of neighbourhoods • Local employment • Lack of infrastructure • Transport issues • Rural isolation • Village design statement

Page 35: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Or is it about these issues?

“For years too many streets…have been ruined by a tasteless jumble of shop signs, railings and billboards, and the people who live there have been left powerless to clear away this clutter. Well enough’s enough. We want to give power back to local people so they can decide what their neighbourhoods look like”

Source: Grant Shapps, DCLG, 6 June 2011

Page 36: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Neighbourhood Planning

• Does neighbourhood planning need to end in a neighbourhood plan (or order)?

• It all ends up as part of the Council’s plan

• Is it about who does the work?

Page 37: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Neighbourhoods and CIL?

Page 38: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

A Councillor’s role• Councillors should be at the centre of

neighbourhood and parish or town council discussions about new neighbourhood plans”

Greg Clark March 2011

• Working with the neighbourhoods – explaining, – leading, – inspiring, – helping

Page 39: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Councillor involvement

• Frontrunners– Mixture of enthusiasm and suspicion– Front runner initiative stemmed from them eg Lake

District, Mole Valley, Dawlish, Crawley– Tension between district and parish councillors?

Page 40: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

• We say– What’s the problem you are trying to solve?– Find out about the local appetite– Make link with local plan– Manage conflict and competing bids– Mediate, explain, cajole– Early and frank discussions– Understand the alternatives– Think about CIL

Page 41: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Discussion

• Is anyone here involved in a neighbourhood plan?

• What’s the appetite for it amongst your community?

• Do you see this as an opportunity?

• How will you manage community expectations (or aren’t there any)?

Page 42: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

National Planning Policy Framework (draft)

• Bringing together all the existing policy and guidance into one policy document

• Very pro-growth • Golden thread - presumption• Plan-led system• 14,000 responses• But

– Good to think, plan, prepare– Direction of travel is clear

Page 43: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Changes?

• Mainly a distillation of existing policies into a much shorter document

• But content of policies has changed, for example:– Town centre first for offices– Target for building on brownfield land– Green belt policy (where previously built upon)– Target for affordable housing

Page 44: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Planning for Sustainable Development

• Planning for prosperity (economy)

• Planning for people (social)

• Planning for places (environmental)

Page 45: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Plan Positively

• Planning should do all it can to support economic growth

• Planning must operate to encourage growth ….and not act as an impediment

• Every effort should be made– To identify the housing, business and other development

needs* of an area– And respond positively to wider opportunities for growth

* do they mean needs or demand?

Page 46: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

So, local authorities should….. (para 14)

• Prepare local plans on the basis that ‘objectively assessed needs’ should be met

• Approve proposals that accord with you plan

• Approve proposals where the plan is absent, silent, indeterminate…out of date

Page 47: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Unless….

• ….adverse impacts of allowing development would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole

Remember – still a presumption in favour of the plan

Page 48: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Discussion

• Your thoughts?

Page 49: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Thank you

• Monthly newsletter. Sign up !• Peer challenge• Plan-making support• Focus on cost / value of service

benchmark

Page 50: Planning reform and localism Date: November 2011.

Contact us

email [email protected] www.pas.gov.ukphone 020 7664 3000


Recommended