+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Political Accountability and the Room to Maneuver

Political Accountability and the Room to Maneuver

Date post: 13-Mar-2016
Category:
Upload: vladimir-reyes
View: 26 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Political Accountability and the Room to Maneuver. Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, Princeton, November 17-18, 2006. Thomas Sattler ETH Zurich [email protected]. John Freeman University of Minnesota [email protected]. Patrick T. Brandt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
12
Political Accountability and the Room to Maneuver Thomas Sattler ETH Zurich [email protected] h John Freeman University of Minnesota [email protected] Patrick T. Brandt University of Texas, Dallas [email protected] Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, Princeton, November 17-18, 2006
Transcript
Page 1: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Political Accountability and the Room to Maneuver

Thomas SattlerETH Zurich

[email protected]

John FreemanUniversity of Minnesota

[email protected]

Patrick T. BrandtUniversity of Texas, Dallas

[email protected]

Meeting of the International Political Economy Society, Princeton, November 17-18, 2006

Page 2: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Introduction• Most political scientists now agree that

governments retain significant room to maneuver in a globalized economy.

• They assume rather than demonstrate that citizens are satisfied with policy choices and economic outcomes, i.e. political accountability exists in open democracies.

• We examine how much, if any, room to maneuver democratic governments actually retain.

Page 3: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

• Political scientists demonstrate the importance of economic outcomes for political approval.

• Economists analyze effects of economic policy with no provisions of accountability.

• Both ignore the endogenous relationship between the polity and the economy.

Critique

Page 4: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

A Genuine Political Economy Framework

Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „TIFF (Unkomprimiert)“

benötigt.

Page 5: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Method: Bayesian Structural VAR

Sample: United Kingdom 1981:11-1997:4, monthly

Variables are in Three Groups

Polity: Vote Intentions (VI); Prime Minister Approval (PA); Personal/Sociotropic Economic Expectations (PE/SE); Exogenous Electoral Counter

Policy: Domestic and Foreign Interest Rates (IR and USIR)

Economy: Domestic and Foreign CPI and Output (CPI and USCPI; IIP and USIIP); $/£ Exchange Rate (XR)

Method and Data

Page 6: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Posterior Model Fit Summaries for B-SVAR models

Model Fit

Model LogMDD

Bayes factorv.No

Accountability

Bayes factorv.

PolicyResponse

NoAccountability 8419

PolicyResponse 8432 13

Accountability 8478 59 46

Page 7: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

UK Interest Rate Response to Politics

Page 8: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Political Responses to Exchange Rate and Interest Rate Shocks

Page 9: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Domestic Real Economy Responses to Policy Shocks

Page 10: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Political Responses to Real Economic Shocks

Page 11: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

Electoral Counter Densities

Page 12: Political Accountability and the  Room to Maneuver

• The accountability mechanism that we found works outside the real economy.

• Government capacity to shape real economic outcomes was limited in Britain from 1981 to 1997.

• Work in Progress: Analysis including British fiscal policy over the longer period to 2005:

- Which role does fiscal policy play for political accountability?

- How does delegation of monetary policy to the Bank of England in 1997 affect the government capacity to cope with globalization?

Conclusion


Recommended