+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Pomeroy-Mason Bridge over the Ohio River Osterberg Cell ... P… · Ohio River Potential Failure...

Pomeroy-Mason Bridge over the Ohio River Osterberg Cell ... P… · Ohio River Potential Failure...

Date post: 19-Oct-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Geohazards Geohazards in Transportation in Transportation Appalachian Region Technical Forum Appalachian Region Technical Forum August 1 August 1 - - 2, 2007 2, 2007 Drilled Shafts for Bridge Foundation Drilled Shafts for Bridge Foundation Stability Improvement Stability Improvement Ohio 833 Bridge over the Ohio River Ohio 833 Bridge over the Ohio River An Update An Update Meigs County, Ohio Meigs County, Ohio Mason County, West Virginia Mason County, West Virginia By By Stan Harris, P.E. and Eric Kistner, P.E. Stan Harris, P.E. and Eric Kistner, P.E. FMSM Engineers FMSM Engineers
Transcript
  • GeohazardsGeohazards in Transportationin TransportationAppalachian Region Technical ForumAppalachian Region Technical Forum

    August 1August 1--2, 20072, 2007

    ““Drilled Shafts for Bridge Foundation Drilled Shafts for Bridge Foundation Stability ImprovementStability Improvement

    Ohio 833 Bridge over the Ohio RiverOhio 833 Bridge over the Ohio River””An UpdateAn Update

    Meigs County, OhioMeigs County, OhioMason County, West VirginiaMason County, West Virginia

    ByByStan Harris, P.E. and Eric Kistner, P.E.Stan Harris, P.E. and Eric Kistner, P.E.

    FMSM EngineersFMSM Engineers

  • AgendaAgendaI.I. Introduction/BackgroundIntroduction/Background

    A.A. GeneralGeneralB.B. Initial Slope MovementInitial Slope MovementC.C. Remediation SchemeRemediation SchemeD.D. Instrumentation PlanInstrumentation Plan

    II.II. Instrumentation Results/Recent Slope Instrumentation Results/Recent Slope MovementMovement

    III.III. New Instrumentation on Existing BridgeNew Instrumentation on Existing BridgeIV.IV. Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedV.V. Question/AnswerQuestion/Answer

  • I. Introduction/BackgroundI. Introduction/Background

  • Project LocationProject Location

    Pomeroy, Ohio

  • Project TeamProject Team

    Owner: ODOT/WVDOHOwner: ODOT/WVDOHDesigner: URS CorporationDesigner: URS CorporationContractor: Mahan/National Joint Contractor: Mahan/National Joint

    VentureVentureGeotechnical Consultant Geotechnical Consultant –– FMSM FMSM

  • Existing StructureExisting StructureOHIO

    WEST VIRGINIA

  • Proposed StructureProposed Structure

    WEST VIRGINIA

    OHIO

  • Project TimelineProject Timeline2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

    FMSM Geotechnical Exploration

    Bridge DesignBridge Construction

    Slope MonitoringSlope Movement Detected

    Construction of Protective Measures

    Monitoring of Protective Measures

    20072006

    Monitoring of Existing Bridge

  • Current State of ConstructionCurrent State of Construction

  • Stability Issues/Slope Movement/ReactionStability Issues/Slope Movement/Reaction

    New Main Street EmbankmentNew Main Street EmbankmentShortShort--Term Stability ConcernsTerm Stability ConcernsControlled RateControlled Rate--ofof--FillFill–– Slope InclinometersSlope Inclinometers–– PiezometersPiezometers

    Initial Detection of MovementInitial Detection of MovementAdditional InstrumentationAdditional Instrumentation

  • Original Extents of Slope MovementOriginal Extents of Slope Movement

    Approximate Limits of Slope

    Movement

  • Probable Causes of Slope Probable Causes of Slope MovementMovement

    Weak slickensided clay shale Weak slickensided clay shale (mudstone)(mudstone)Possible ancient movementPossible ancient movementConstruction activity/embankmentConstruction activity/embankmentRapid drawdown cycles of Ohio RiverRapid drawdown cycles of Ohio River

  • Slope Geology/GeometrySlope Geology/Geometry

    Shale/Clay Shale/Mudstone Bedrock

    Alluvial Silt and ClayExisting Fill

    New Fill

    Ohio River

    Apparent Failure Surface

    Residual Clay

    Siltstone

  • Ohio River

    Potential Failure Surface

    Siltstone

    ODOTODOT’’s Preferred Option s Preferred Option and Related Decisionsand Related Decisions

    One Row of Nine Drilled Shafts Between the Land Pier and the Water Pier

    Realign Main Street to Reduce Fill Height

    Touch Down PierAbutment

    Ohio Tower

    NEW BRIDGE

    Change Abutment and Land Pier Foundations to Drilled Shafts

  • Plan View of Stabilization ShaftsPlan View of Stabilization Shafts

    8’ Diameter Drilled Shafts on 12’ c/c

    Spacing

  • Revised Roadway PlanRevised Roadway Plan

  • Instrumentation PlanInstrumentation Plan

    Site Site –– Slope Inclinometers, PiezometersSlope Inclinometers, PiezometersExisting Bridge Existing Bridge –– Tiltmeters, Survey Tiltmeters, Survey TargetsTargetsTouch Down Pier Touch Down Pier –– Strain Gauges, InStrain Gauges, In--Place and Manually Read InclinometerPlace and Manually Read InclinometerStabilization Shafts Stabilization Shafts –– Tiltmeters, Strain Tiltmeters, Strain Gauges, InGauges, In--Place and Manually Read Place and Manually Read InclinometersInclinometers

  • Stabilization Shaft Instrumentation PlanStabilization Shaft Instrumentation Plan

  • II.II. Recent Slope Movement/ Recent Slope Movement/ Instrumentation ResultsInstrumentation Results

  • Recent Movement (Oct Recent Movement (Oct ’’06 06 -- Feb Feb ’’07)07)

    DetectionDetection–– Instrumentation Activity (late October)Instrumentation Activity (late October)–– Tension Cracks (early December)Tension Cracks (early December)–– Water Main Break (early December)Water Main Break (early December)

    CausesCauses–– Construction ActivityConstruction Activity–– River FluctuationRiver Fluctuation

  • Tension Cracks Tension Cracks –– 12/11/0612/11/06

  • Construction Activity Construction Activity –– 11/30/0611/30/06

  • Ohio River FluctuationsOhio River FluctuationsRiver Elevation (feet)

    520.0

    530.0

    540.0

    550.0

    560.0

    570.0

    580.0

    10/1

    /04

    12/1

    /04

    2/1/

    05

    4/1/

    05

    6/1/

    05

    8/1/

    05

    10/1

    /05

    12/1

    /05

    2/1/

    06

    4/1/

    06

    6/1/

    06

    8/1/

    06

    10/1

    /06

    12/1

    /06

    2/1/

    07

    Slope Movement

  • Tied Back Retaining WallTied Back Retaining Wall

  • Results of InstrumentationResults of InstrumentationSiteSite–– 4 Years of Data4 Years of Data–– Numerous Inclinometers Sheared Due to Slope Numerous Inclinometers Sheared Due to Slope

    MovementMovementExisting BridgeExisting Bridge–– 3 Years of Data3 Years of Data–– Abutment Tilt Due to Recent MovementAbutment Tilt Due to Recent MovementNew Bridge Touch Down PierNew Bridge Touch Down Pier–– 3 Years of Data3 Years of Data–– Top Deflection Due to Lateral LoadingTop Deflection Due to Lateral LoadingStabilization Shafts Stabilization Shafts –– 2 Years of Data2 Years of Data–– Northernmost Shaft Being LoadedNorthernmost Shaft Being Loaded

  • Current Extents of Slope MovementCurrent Extents of Slope Movement

    Limits of Movement

  • Existing Bridge Tiltmeter ResultsExisting Bridge Tiltmeter Results

    11/01/2004

    12/01/2004

    01/01/2005

    02/01/2005

    03/01/2005

    04/01/2005

    05/01/2005

    06/01/2005

    07/01/2005

    08/01/2005

    09/01/2005

    10/01/2005

    11/01/2005

    12/01/2005

    01/01/2006

    02/01/2006

    03/01/2006

    04/01/2006

    05/01/2006

    06/01/2006

    07/01/2006

    08/01/2006

    09/01/2006

    10/01/2006

    11/01/2006

    12/01/2006

    01/01/2007

    02/01/2007

    03/01/2007

    04/01/2007

    05/01/2007

    06/01/2007

    07/01/2007

    08/01/2007

    09/01/2007

    Time

    -0.15

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    Tilt

    (deg

    )AbutmentLand Pier TopLand Pier BottomWater Pier Top

    Zeroed Y-Tilt ReadingsPositive → Top Moving Downslope

    Abutment

    Land Pier Top

    Land Pier Bottom

    Water Pier Top

    Instrument Malfunction Instrument Malfunction

  • Existing Bridge Tiltmeter ResultsExisting Bridge Tiltmeter Results

    -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60Temperature (C)

    -0.15

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    -20

    -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    Temperature (F)Temperature Influence on Y-Tilt Readings

    -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60Temperature (C)

    -0.15

    -0.10

    -0.05

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    Tilt

    (deg

    )

    -20

    -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

    100

    110

    120

    130

    140

    Temperature (F)Temperature Influence on X-Tilt Readings

    Land Pier Top Tiltmeters

    Looking Upslope, P

    ositive → C

    lockwise Tilt

    Positive → Top M

    oving Dow

    nslope

    First Track:Oct-2004 – Mar-2005

    Second Track:Aug-2005 – Oct-2006

    Third Track:Oct-2006 – Dec-2006 Fourth Track:

    Dec-2006 – Feb-2007

    Fifth Track:Feb-2007 – July-2007

  • Stabilization Shaft Strain Gage ResultsStabilization Shaft Strain Gage Results

    -6000 -5000 -4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000Moment (kip-ft)

    460

    470

    480

    490

    500

    510

    520

    530

    540

    550

    Ele

    vatio

    n (ft

    )

    LPILE 0.2"21-Oct-200604-Nov-200618-Nov-200602-Dec-200616-Dec-200630-Dec-200614-Jan-200728-Jan-200711-Feb-200725-Feb-200711-Mar-200725-Mar-200708-Apr-200722-Apr-200706-May-200720-May-200703-Jun-200717-Jun-200701-Jul-200715-Jul-2007

    SS9: Moment Diagram

    Cra

    ckin

    g M

    omen

    t

    Cra

    ckin

    g M

    omen

    t

    Bottom of Shaft

    Top of Rock

    Top of Shaft

    With Linear RegressionDarker =

    More Recent

    Positive Moment ⇒ Tension on Upslope Face

  • Stabilization Shaft 9 Stabilization Shaft 9 –– IPI PlotIPI Plot

  • Touch Down Pier Strain Gage ResultsTouch Down Pier Strain Gage Results

    09/01/0410/01/0411/01/0412/01/0401/01/0502/01/0503/01/0504/01/0505/01/0506/01/0507/01/0508/01/0509/01/0510/01/0511/01/0512/01/0501/01/0602/01/0603/01/0604/01/0605/01/0606/01/0607/01/0608/01/0609/01/0610/01/0611/01/0612/01/0601/01/0702/01/0703/01/0704/01/0705/01/0706/01/0707/01/0708/01/0709/01/07

    Time

    -6000

    -5000

    -4000

    -3000

    -2000

    -1000

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    Ben

    ding

    Mom

    ent (

    kip-

    ft)

    El. 530 ftEl. 534 ftEl. 542 ftEl. 566 ftEl. 576 ft

    DS-54: Bending Moment History

    Cracking Moment (approx. 30% of Moment Capacity)

    Cracking Moment (approx. 30% of Moment Capacity)

  • III. New Instrumentation on III. New Instrumentation on Existing BridgeExisting Bridge

    –– Jointmeters Jointmeters (3 Joints on (3 Joints on Ohio Side)Ohio Side)

    –– Tiltmeters on Tiltmeters on Linkage Linkage AssembliesAssemblies

    –– Strain Gages Strain Gages on Truss on Truss MembersMembers

  • IV. Lessons LearnedIV. Lessons LearnedDifficulty with Instrumentation Durability in Difficulty with Instrumentation Durability in Construction/River EnvironmentConstruction/River EnvironmentSoleSole--Source Instrumentation ConsultantsSource Instrumentation ConsultantsCommunication Between Contractor and Communication Between Contractor and Engineer KeyEngineer KeyBetter Results from Tiltmeters/Strain Gages Better Results from Tiltmeters/Strain Gages than than IPIIPI’’ssLook for Agreement Between InstrumentsLook for Agreement Between InstrumentsHuman Intervention with Instruments Human Intervention with Instruments Necessary At TimesNecessary At TimesInstallation and Access Can Be DifficultInstallation and Access Can Be Difficult

  • V. Questions/AnswersV. Questions/Answers

    “Drilled Shafts for Bridge Foundation Stability Improvement�Ohio 833 Bridge over the Ohio River”�An Update��Meigs County, OhAgendaI. Introduction/BackgroundProject LocationProject TeamExisting StructureProposed StructureProject TimelineCurrent State of ConstructionStability Issues/Slope Movement/ReactionOriginal Extents of Slope MovementProbable Causes of Slope MovementSlope Geology/GeometryPlan View of Stabilization ShaftsRevised Roadway PlanInstrumentation PlanStabilization Shaft Instrumentation PlanRecent Slope Movement/ Instrumentation ResultsRecent Movement (Oct ’06 - Feb ’07)Tension Cracks – 12/11/06Construction Activity – 11/30/06Ohio River FluctuationsTied Back Retaining WallResults of InstrumentationCurrent Extents of Slope MovementExisting Bridge Tiltmeter ResultsExisting Bridge Tiltmeter ResultsStabilization Shaft Strain Gage ResultsStabilization Shaft 9 – IPI PlotTouch Down Pier Strain Gage ResultsIII. New Instrumentation on Existing BridgeIV. Lessons LearnedV. Questions/Answers


Recommended