+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Pop Lecture 106

Pop Lecture 106

Date post: 08-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: asdfzxcv31
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 20

Transcript
  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    1/20

    Sriya Iyer

    Faculty of Economics and St. Catharines College

    University of Cambridge

    Demography and Development

    Topic 1Why do economists want to explain demographic

    behaviour? Transition theory and the Malthusian model

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    2/20

    1

    Contents

    Recent demographic patterns in developing economies

    Explaining past and current trends in population

    theory of demographic transition

    Malthusian model

    microeconomic household demand model

    Demographic and economic literature on

    macro- and micro reproductive externalities

    social norms and social interactions

    mortality and missing women

    General policy debates about population

    Specific population debates in India, China, Kenya, the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa

    Course outline handout provides:

    Essential reading for course

    Specific reading for each topic (also available on Faculty website)

    Suggested supervision questions

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    3/20

    2

    Why do economists want to explain demographic behaviour?

    Historical trends in population growth

    Population bomb or population explosion - is population harmful or beneficial for economic

    development?

    Contemporary population debates echo what Malthus set out on 7 June 1798 in the Preface to hisAn Essay on the Principle of Population:

    It is an obvious truththat population must always be kept down to the level of the means of

    subsistence and it is a view of these means which forms the strongest obstacle in the way to any

    very great future improvement of society.

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    4/20

    3

    What are the main trends in population growth throughout the last two

    millennia?

    Year World Pop Year World Pop Year World Pop Year World Pop

    1 AD 300m 1800 950m 1933 2,057m 1995 5,716m

    1500 600m 1850 1,200m 1950 2,515m 2000 6,130m

    1750

    800

    m 1900

    1,650m 1985 4,8

    00m

    20308,

    200m*

    *Projected estimate, based on current trends

    Natural population increase occurs when the birth rate is higher then the death rate

    An individuals countrys population growth compared to world population growth

    Growth rate: Worldwide population growth rate is 1.5% per year, and this is expected to continue

    Size: In absolute numbers, the population is growing by about 230,000 people a day

    Regional imbalance: 90% of this increase is forecast to be in less developed countries

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    5/20

    4

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    6/20

    5

    What are the differences between historical trends in population

    growth and current trends in global population?

    Mortality trends: 20C LDC mortality lower than in 19C LDCs.

    DR/BR balance: DR decline preceded the decline in BR by 20 years.

    The result: very high rates of population growth of3-4% a year. 20C LDC fertility is 150% greater

    than the maximum achieved in 19C.

    Post 1960 and demographic momentum: birth rates have also been declining rapidly in most

    LDCs.

    Strong regional differences: between LDCs, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    7/20

    6

    What is the empirical association between population and economic

    development?

    Inverse relationship: higher average income

    lower fertility. Sub-Saharan Africa (4-6

    children) vs. East Asia and Latin America (2-3

    children).

    Outliers: Middle East, China, India

    Faster growth during the 20C than during the

    19C, particularly in LDCs.

    Related to the balance between trends in

    mortality and fertility.

    Direction of causation between population and

    development unclear

    Region Average Fertility

    Rate (1995)

    GNP per capita ($)*

    (1995)

    Sub-Saharan Africa 5.7 490

    Middle East and

    North Africa

    4.2 1780

    South Asia 3.5 350

    Latin America and

    the Caribbean

    2.8 3320

    East Asia and the

    Pacific

    2.2 800

    Europe and Central

    Asia

    2.0 2220

    China 1.9 620

    India 3.2 340

    World 2.9 4880

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    8/20

    7

    Is population growth good or bad for economic development?

    Improvement in development indicators: World food production, infant survival, life expectancy at

    birth, literacy have all improved despite rapid population growth

    Positive externalities of human genius (Boserup, Simon)

    Models of endogenous growth: new ideas or knowledge are main source of economic growth;population growth increases markets for goods and services.

    Are poor people in LDCs irrational?

    Is a collection of reasoned decisions at the individual level always optimal at the collective level?

    What are the resource allocation failures in the context of childbearing?

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    9/20

    8

    What are the major sources of possible negative externalities of high

    fertility and fast population growth?

    Savings & investment (esp. human capital investment)

    Environmental externalities (esp. well-defined property rights) and the tragedy of the commons

    Social norms Marshallian atmospheric externalities

    Theories to explain population growth in developing economies:

    Theories of demographic transition

    Malthusian theories

    Microeconomic household demand models Models of social interactions

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    10/20

    9

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    11/20

    10

    What demographic patterns does demographic transition theory

    identify?

    Stage I = High birthrates & high deathrates

    typical birthrate 35 per 1000,

    typical deathrate 30 per 1000.

    slow population growth of0.5% p.a.

    Stage II = modernization

    Deathrates fall from 30 per 1000 to 20 per 1000

    life expectancy rises from 60

    Birthrates stay high (35 per 1000)

    fast pop. growth of 1.5% p.a.

    Stage III = further modernization falls from 35 per 1000 to 10 per 1000

    deathrate continues to fall to 10 per 1000

    Birthrate & deathrate converge, and population growth is zero or very slow

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    12/20

    11

    What are the problems with demographic transition theory?

    Demographic transition theory is purely descriptive

    Differences in transition for some present-day LDCs from the western European experience

    First difference in Stage I. Before 1950, LDCs had birthrates (at 43 per 1000) & deathrates (at

    37 per 1000) much higher than Europe at same stage

    Second difference in Stage II. Deathrate did begin to fall in most LDCs from 1950. But much

    faster than in 19C LDCs to 10 or 15 per 1000. So, instead of growing only at 1.5% p.a., 20C LDC

    populations grew at 2-2.5% p.a

    Third and most crucial difference is in Stage III. Consider2 cases A and B on diagram.

    Majority of LDCs (sub-Saharan Africa) still in Case B. Failure to experience entire mortalitydecline of Stage II because of widespread & persistent poverty

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    13/20

    12

    Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834)

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    14/20

    13

    How did Malthus explain the relationship between population and

    economic development?

    The view that he has given of human life has a

    melancholy hue, but he feels conscious that he

    has drawn these dark tints from a conviction

    that they are really in the picture, and not from

    a jaundiced eye or an inherent spleen of

    disposition. The theory of mind which he hassketched accounts for the existence of most of

    the evils of life!

    Thomas Robert Malthus,An Essay on the

    Principle of Population (1798)

    The Malthusian model:

    Population grows at a geometric rate

    Food supply grows at an arithmetic rate

    The very striking consequence: per capita

    incomes fall to subsistence

    Avoid absolute poverty by indulging in moral

    restraint

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    15/20

    14

    What 3 assumptions underlie the population trap theory?

    Diminishing returns to scale in production.

    Positive income effect on fertility.

    Reproductive behaviour homogeneous across economy.

    What is the population trap? (See Figure 1)

    Point A = Malthusian population trap level of income is attained, economy stuck at chronic low

    income, Y1.

    Point A is a stable equilibrium

    For poor nations to overcome population pressures, they will need

    Malthusian preventive checks such as delayed marriage and birth control

    Malthusian positive checks such as starvation/disease/wars will restrain population

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    16/20

    15

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    17/20

    16

    How do we get out of the Malthusian trap?

    A "big push" far enough away from point A to

    escape forces pushing economy back into

    equilibrium.

    Types of "big push" to get to Point B:

    On the P curve. By preventive checks e.g.

    family limitation programmes

    On the Y curve. An investment &

    industrialization programme

    What does the Malthusian population

    trap theory not explain?

    The Industrial Revolution

    Shape ofY curve: technological progress

    Shape of P curve: mortality and fertility dont

    relate to income in predicted way

    Poverty in India in the nineteenth century

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    18/20

    17

    The views of Malthus contemporaries

    It begins with the assumption that population tends to increase in a geometrical ratio while

    subsistence can at best be made to increase in only an arithmetic ratio an assumption just as

    valid, and no more so, than it would be, from the fact that a puppy doubled the length of his tail

    while he added so many pounds to his weight, to assert a geometric progression of the tail and an

    arithmetic progression of the weight the savants of a previously dogless island might deduce the

    very striking consequence that by the time the dog grew to a weight of fifty pounds his tail wouldbe over a mile long and extremely difficult to wag, and hence recommend the prudential check of a

    bandage as the only alternative to the positive check of constant amputations.

    Henry George, Progress and Poverty(1879)

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    19/20

    18

    Can we draw lessons from Malthusian theory today?

    Inevitable effect of population on the standard of living

    Influence on policy-making and model-building in economics

    But, Malthusian theories are flawed by the assumptions of diminishing returns and of a positive

    income effect on fertility

    =>We need a better theory of the relationship between population and economic

    development!

  • 8/7/2019 Pop Lecture 106

    20/20

    19

    Useful Reading (the most important are starred)

    On the relation between population and development

    *A. C. Kelley, Economic consequences of population change inthe Third World, Journal of economic literature 26 (1988).

    *N. Birdsall, Analytical approaches to population growth, in H.Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Handbook of development

    economics vol. 1 (1988).

    P. Dasgupta, The population problem: Theory and evidence,Journal of economic literature 33, 1879-1902 (1995).

    World Bank, World development report 1984: Population (1984).

    World Bank, Beyond economic growth Chapter III on WorldPopulation Growth (2000).

    On demographic transition theory

    *J. C. Caldwell, Towards a restatement of the demographictransition theory Population and Development Review 2(3-4),321-366 (1976).

    J.-C. Chesnais, The Demographic Transition: Stages, Patternsand Economic Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press(1992).

    A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins, The Decline of Fertility in Europe.Princeton: Princeton University Press (1986).

    On the Malthusian model

    T. R. Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, P. James(ed.) 2 volumes, Cambridge (1989).

    S. Hollander, The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus, Studiesin Classical Political Economy IV, University of Toronto Press(1997), esp. 13-69.

    *D. R. Weir, Malthuss theory of population, in J. Eatwell et al.(eds.), The new Palgrave: Economic development (1987),236-231.


Recommended