+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Portal User Group Meeting May 14, 2008. Agenda Updates CT.gov Template Redesigns CT.gov 2.0...

Portal User Group Meeting May 14, 2008. Agenda Updates CT.gov Template Redesigns CT.gov 2.0...

Date post: 14-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: kristian-hudgeons
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
36
Portal User Group Meeting May 14, 2008
Transcript

Portal User Group Meeting

May 14, 2008

Agenda

• Updates

• CT.gov Template Redesigns

• CT.gov 2.0 Involvement

• Form Vulnerabilities

• Accessibility Policy Changes

• Reminders

Updates

• Migration Status

• WebTrends

• RFP

• Stock Photos

• Streaming Video

Migration Status Update

88%

6%

0%

6%

Completed

In Progress

Queue

On Hold

Completed 96

In Progress 7

Queue 0

On Hold7

WebTrends Update

• WebTrends Replacement Bid produced no responses

• WebTrends Professional Services are expected to be scheduled for the week of May 27th

• WebTrends will be removed from servers and re-installed new

• Profiles will be re-analyzed from scratch

RFP Update

• RFP is complete

• RFP has not been released due to budget considerations

• Decision is expected by late June

Stock Photos Update

• IStockPhoto (www.istockphoto.com)

• Graphics can only be downloaded by PMG

• Agencies can browse photos online

• Finite number of photos; Agencies are limited to 5 per year per site

Stock Photo Update - Restrictions

• Photos from IStockPhoto.com are for web use only

• Photos cannot be stored on a shared drive

• Credit must be given for photos

• Follow all copyright rules and laws

Streaming Video

• Internal Streaming Video is available

• Procedures are in development

• External Streaming Video will be hosted by a vendor– DOIT-10 is in process currently

CT.gov Template Redesign –Why A Version 3?

• V2 Templates experienced unforeseen issues

• Graphic Designer was not on staff when V2 was developed

• We took a vote among the agencies that requested V2 and majority went with V3

CT.gov Template Redesign –New Look and Feel

• Greater freedom of expression for Agencies

• Opportunity to clean up sites, reduce Home Page links

• During conversion to V3 templates, Agencies will work closely with Graphic Designer to keep “family” look, while still maintaining their own identity

CT.gov Template Redesign –V3 Templates

• Two different layouts– Left Nav– Top Nav

• http://vvv.dir.ct.gov/doit/PUGM_051408/concept_L1.htm

• Governor launched new site today using a variation of the new template (http://www.ct.gov/governorrell)

CT.gov Template Redesign –Header (Banner) Ideas

• Option 1– Header/Banner will use the same image for all State

Agencies

• Option 2– Header/Banner will be customizable by Agency

(Standard Banners will be available if desired)

• Site Poll is available on CPI– Log in to access this area– Partners Portal User Group Meetings– Poll is on Left Nav at the bottom

CT.gov 2.0 Initiative

• Features/Latest News

• Navigation

• Content

• Creation of Work Groups

CT.gov 2.0 Initiative – Taxonomy/Navigation

• Issues– Over 5 years old. Needs to be completely

redone– Could use navigation based on user group

(G2C, G2B, etc)– Existing links may be out of date– Some links are too many levels down. Try to

limit to 3 levels before getting to actual content.

CT.gov 2.0 Initiative –Features/News Items

• Issues– Content is not updated frequently enough– No dedicated resource to manage – There have been no new features added– Site needs to be more innovative

CT.gov 2.0 Initiative –Content

• Issues– No new content is being created– Existing content is not being updated

CT.gov 2.0 Involvement –Work Groups

CT.gov Portal Work Group• Phase 1

– Revise site navigation and content– Develop procedures to keep agencies involved in updating process – Review statistics on how the current taxonomy is working. Is it effective?

• Phase 2– Train agencies on new procedures – Set ongoing communication plan to keep agencies involved

Strategic Planning Work Group• Determine what agencies should be focusing on to make sites better• Benchmark with other states and determine our strengths and

weaknesses• Develop plan to assist agencies to reach goals

Web Forms DesignSecurity Best Practices

Mark Reynolds

DOIT Security Division

Form Vulnerabilities –Agenda

• Security Issues

• Scrubbing Forms Input

• Denial of Service Protection Mechanisms

• Malicious Injection

• Data Validation

Form Vulnerabilities –Security Issues

• http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1997-25.html

– If user-supplied data is not sufficiently sanitized, local and remote users may be able to execute arbitrary commands on the HTTP server with the privileges of the httpd daemon. They may then be able to compromise the HTTP server and under certain configurations gain privileged access.

http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1997-25.html

Form Vulnerabilities –Security Issues

• http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-02.htmlMalicious HTML Tags Embedded in Client Web Requests

– A web site may inadvertently include malicious HTML tags or script in a dynamically generated page based on unvalidated input from untrustworthy sources. This can be a problem when input is not validated to prevent malicious HTML from being presented to the user.

http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-02.html

Proposed Revision to the State of Connecticut Web Site Accessibility

PolicyKathleen Anderson

Accessibility Policy Changes –Communications

• Email posted to ct-access Listserv: http://www.access.state.ct.us/policies/proposed_revision.html

• Draft of Revised Policy – Version 5: http://www.access.state.ct.us/documents/20080506_draft_policy.doc

Accessibility Policy Changes – Differences Between Section 508

and WCAG 1.0If a web site is WCAG A-Compliant and its

author wants to be Section 508 compliant as well, these are the five standards he must address additionally. These are paragraphs 1194.22 (l), (m), (n), (o), and (p).

Accessibility Policy Changes –L

• (l) When pages utilize scripting languages to display content, or to create interface elements, the information provided by the script shall be identified with functional text that can be read by assistive technology.

Accessibility Policy Changes –M

• (m) When a web page requires that an applet, plug-in or other application be present on the client system to interpret page content, the page must provide a link to a plug-in or applet that complies with §1194.21(a) through (l).

Accessibility Policy Changes –N

• (n) When electronic forms are designed to be completed on-line, the form shall allow people using assistive technology to access the information, field elements, and functionality required for completion and submission of the form, including all directions and cues.

Accessibility Policy Changes –O

• (o) A method shall be provided that permits users to skip repetitive navigation links.

Accessibility Policy Changes –P

• (p) When a timed response is required, the user shall be alerted and given sufficient time to indicate more time is required.

Accessibility Policy Changes –Training Resources

• Jim Thatcher http://jimthatcher.com/webcourse1.htm

• HTML Writers Guild: Introduction to Designing Accessible Websites http://www.hwg.org/services/classes/accessibilitydesign.html

• On-site training if requested

Accessibility Policy Changes –For More Info

• Accessibility Web Site: http://www.access.state.ct.us/

• Accessibility Listserv (ct-access): http://www.access.state.ct.us/listserv/

• Kathleen Anderson (860) 622-2159 or [email protected]

Reminders

• Use IMPACT and Help Desk– Better Service– Tracking Capabilities

• Copying Word documents directly into DSF– Use WordPad or NotePad

• Images– Images must be uploaded before they can be inserted

into the content page– ClipArt images must be saved separately from the

Word document to upload

Reminders – Next Meetings

• Next Portal User Group Meetings are currently scheduled as follows:– Wednesday, July 9, 2008– Wednesday, October 1, 2008– Wednesday, December 10, 2008

• CPI Calendar (www.ct.gov/cpi)

Open Discussion

Thank You


Recommended