+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Post-mortem for virtual close - Deloitte United States...facilitate a post-mortem review and...

Post-mortem for virtual close - Deloitte United States...facilitate a post-mortem review and...

Date post: 19-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Post-mortem for virtual close Accounting and reporting impacts What were the technical accounting or disclosure impacts of the current crisis? How might they change in future periods? Which elements of the financial statements did we need to have increased focus on, for example, receivables or MD&A? Was there adequate time and information allowed for management reviews at all levels? Where do we feel there is more limited transparency into the results and underlying drivers? Were there any new focus areas for the external audit this period or places where the auditors spent additional time? Timeline What were the visible or hidden impacts to our timeline, even if we managed to work around them? How did our close and reporting KPIs compare to prior periods? What does this tell us about the close? What new items came onto the critical closing path this past close? Should we adjust the timeline or expectations for future periods? Close and task management How well were we able to centrally manage and control the close and reporting tasks? Were there any changes to the nature or extent of our journal entries compared to prior periods? Which closing tasks were difficult to perform remotely and what were the reasons for the difficulty? Which tasks were completed late and what were the reasons? Do we need to shift tasks between individuals to meet the closing timetable? Does working virtually provide opportunities to redistribute? Do we need to rework or reorder our closing tasks? Are there tasks we should execute during the month? Are there tasks we are performing that are simply not material to our reporting? Governance and compliance Were we able to execute our standard controls effectively remotely? Are there additional risks introduced in the process that we need to better manage? Are there computer-based controls that we need to consider redesigning? Were there adjustments that we had to make to our segregation of duties or approvals? Are there any new controls that we should consider implementing against higher risk items? Resourcing Are we tracking individuals’ workloads to understand who was overloaded and where capacity might exist? Is there additional training we need to provide to equip our people for a remote close? Do we need to consider additional resources to manage spikes in workloads during the monthly or quarterly close? Should we reorganize roles and/or tasks to better group them (e.g., financial line item) and promote clear ownership? The illustrative self-assessment questions below are designed to help facilitate a post-mortem review and critical analysis of the close and external financial reporting process. The questions have been updated to reflect the current environment of needing to close the books at a distance. Use this tool to help assess what worked and what didn't, identify ways to improve the next virtual close, and gather insights into processes to better thrive with a remote workforce.
Transcript
Page 1: Post-mortem for virtual close - Deloitte United States...facilitate a post-mortem review and critical analysis of the close and external financial reporting process. The questions

Post-mortem for virtual close

Accounting and reporting impacts• What were the technical accounting

or disclosure impacts of the current crisis?How might they change in future periods?

• Which elements of the financial statementsdid we need to have increased focus on, forexample, receivables or MD&A?

• Was there adequate time and informationallowed for management reviews atall levels?

• Where do we feel there is more limitedtransparency into the results andunderlying drivers?

• Were there any new focus areas forthe external audit this period or placeswhere the auditors spent additional time?

Timeline

• What were the visible or hidden impacts toour timeline, even if we managed to workaround them?

• How did our close and reporting KPIscompare to prior periods? What does thistell us about the close?

• What new items came onto the criticalclosing path this past close?

• Should we adjust the timeline orexpectations for future periods?

Close and task management

• How well were we able to centrally manageand control the close and reporting tasks?

• Were there any changes to the nature orextent of our journal entries compared toprior periods?

• Which closing tasks were difficult to performremotely and what were the reasons for thedifficulty?

• Which tasks were completed late and whatwere the reasons?

• Do we need to shift tasks betweenindividuals to meet the closing timetable?Does working virtually provideopportunities to redistribute?

• Do we need to rework or reorder ourclosing tasks? Are there tasks we shouldexecute during the month?

• Are there tasks we are performing that aresimply not material to our reporting?

Governance and compliance

• Were we able to execute our standardcontrols effectively remotely?

• Are there additional risks introduced in theprocess that we need to better manage?

• Are there computer-based controls that weneed to consider redesigning?

• Were there adjustments that wehad to make to our segregation of duties orapprovals?

• Are there any new controls that we shouldconsider implementing against higher riskitems?

Resourcing

• Are we tracking individuals’ workloads tounderstand who was overloaded andwhere capacity might exist?

• Is there additional training we need toprovide to equip our people for a remoteclose?

• Do we need to consider additionalresources to manage spikes in workloadsduring the monthly or quarterly close?

• Should we reorganize roles and/or tasks tobetter group them (e.g., financial line item)and promote clear ownership?

The illustrative self-assessment questions below are designed to help facilitate a post-mortem review and critical analysis of the close and external financial reporting process. The questions have been updated to reflect the current environment of needing to close the books at a distance. Use this tool to help assess what worked and what didn't, identify ways to improve the next virtual close, and gather insights into processes to better thrive with a remote workforce.

Page 2: Post-mortem for virtual close - Deloitte United States...facilitate a post-mortem review and critical analysis of the close and external financial reporting process. The questions

Technology enablement

• Does everyone have the appropriate hardware to be able to work remotely with appropriate IT support levels?

• Does everyone have the needed software (e.g., collaboration tools, documentation management) to work remotely?

• Did we have any system access or performance issues that we needto address?

• Are people able to access required documents to support accurate accounting going forward?

• Are there tools that we should consider to better automate elements of the remote close and reporting processes?

Remote working

• What elements of the work were thehardest to execute remotely?

• How has the pattern of work changed, forexample, between executing tasks, directinteractions and meetings? Do we need torebalance?

• What collaboration tools are we using?Can we upgrade our use of these tools?

• Recognizing that everyone’s home situation is different, where can we provide additional support or be more flexible?

• Were there particular countries, businessunits, shared service centers, or third-partyoutsourcers who struggled to workremotely?

• How was the interaction with other non-accounting functions? Any areas forimprovement?

Summary• Do we believe that there is adequate

documentation behind aspects ofthe close or do we need to enhance certainareas?

• Are there tasks performed, information orreports produced that were highlighted tobe of limited value?

• Should we consider a different balancebetween soft and hard closes for monthlyversus quarterly reporting?

• What were the bright spots that we shouldhighlight or learn from?

• Any other areas for future improvements?

Contacts

Beth KaplanCenter for Controllership Director Managing Director Deloitte & Touche LLP [email protected] +1 714 724 5282

Kyle CheneyCenter for Controllership program advisor Partner Deloitte & Touche LLP [email protected] +1 216 589 1387

David CutbillCenter for Controllership Eminence & Marketing leader Principal Deloitte & Touche LLP [email protected] +1 213 364 9232

About Deloitte As used in this document, Deloitte means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.

This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor.

Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.

Copyright © 2020 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.


Recommended