+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Power Electronics for Fuel Cells

Power Electronics for Fuel Cells

Date post: 08-Dec-2016
Category:
Upload: danglien
View: 219 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Florida Power Electronics Center Florida Power Electronics Center http://FloridaPEC.engr.ucf.edu Issa Batarseh [email protected] 8 th August, 2002
Transcript

Florida Power Electronics CenterFlorida Power Electronics Centerhttp://FloridaPEC.engr.ucf.edu

Issa Batarseh

[email protected]

8th August, 2002

Outline

• UCF’s Research Activities• Fuel Cell Basics• Fuel Cell Technical Issues• High Frequency Link Inverter• Simulation and Experimental Results• Concluding remarks

OrlandoArea

WELCOME TO FLORIDA

Power Factor Correction (PFC) Circuits - NASA

Soft-Switching DC-DC Converters - Florida and Industry

Low voltage AC-DC and DC-DC Converters - NSF

Dynamic Modeling and Control - NSF

Electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility - NSF

Inverter Application / Fuel Cell, Photovoltaic Cell - Florida and Industry

Dr.Issa Batarseh – DirectorDr.Wenkai Wu – Asst DirectorDr.Shiguo Luo – Asst Director (ret.)11 Graduate Students

High Frequency AC DPS - NSF & Florida

Florida Power Electronics Center

Classification : Based on electrolyte employed: Phosphoric Acid (PA), Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM), Molten Carbonate (MC), Solid Oxide (SO), Alkaline, Zinc-Air (ZA)

Benefits : Environmental Friendly and quite, Efficient, Cogeneration, Distributed Capacity, Fuel flexibility, Modular, Scalable, Federally Approved System

Applications : Stationary ( Buildings, Hospitals,…), Residential ( Domestic Utility), Transportation ( Fuel Cell Vehicle), Portable Power ( Laptop, cell phone), Landfill/ Wastewater treatment,..etc

Operation : Fuel cells force two fuels (H & O) to produce electrical energy by means of chemical reaction. Unlike combustion engines, no moving partsand unlike batteries, no charging required

Fuel Cell Overview

DC Output : 1~2 V/Cell, hence stacking is required.

Efficiency : Fuel Cells have 40% efficiency and could reach 80% in co-generation

Control : Fuel Cells can operate with or without regulated fuel flow to the stack, i.e. constant or variable fuel flow.

Invented in 1838

Residential Application Issues

• Fuel Cell based power distribution is viable solution for backup generation

• Prices are expected to drop at a much faster rate• The distributed generation for residential application

represents large size of market share• Power electronic interface system are critical to the

success of any residential power distribution application.

• The interface system must be inexpensive and reliable, small size and light weight.

• UPS applications to replace lead batteries (1/7 the size)• Target of a maximum of $40/kW as a manufacturing

cost

Portable Applications

• There is a genuine economic demand for scaled down fuel cell designs to replace battery technology

• Multi billion dollar market share and unit sales of portable electronics device on the rise

• Ever increasing burden on battery life• Increased portable device complexity and application

flexibility with more power requirements. Example: cell phones with added features such as Wireless Application protocol (WAP)

• The distributed generation for residential application represents large size of market share

Fuel Cell Technical Issues

I) Basic physical understanding of Fuel Cells:• Fuel Cell Modeling to determine the optimum

operating conditions• Fuel Cell reaction to load changes, thermal

transients• Understanding operational difficulties involving fuel

cell stacks and it’s V-I characteristic curve.• Filtering requirements due to strict current ripple

specifications• Fuel cell Stack and it’s auxiliary systems such as:Air

compressor, water cooling, valve to control fuel flow, humidifiers

• Understand Power Consumption in Auxiliary Systems

V-I Characteristic of Fuel Cell

Cell Current (Amps)

Cel

l Pot

enti

al (V

)

00 0.5 1.0

0.5

1.5

1.0

Cell Potential Losses dueto lack of electrocatalysis

Mass transport losses due todecrease of cell potential to zero

Linear drop in cell potentialdue to ohmic losses in

solution between electrodes

The ideal cell potential-currentrelation

Thermodynamicreversible cell potential

Fuel Cell Technical Issues

II) The Interface System• Inverter Design Consideration• Battery Backup Consideration• Fuel Cell Protection Consideration• Setup theoretical and physical measurement systems• Size, weight, cost, reliability issues (for residential and

other applications) III) Factors affecting the coupling between Fuel Cell and

the power Inverter :

Standalone• Fuel Flow regulation• Battery Backup

Grid Tied• Fuel Flow regulation• Synchronization to grid

2001 Future Energy Challenge as a design example

• Uses the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) type fuel cell

• Uses Hydrogen Gas. Operating temperature 60-100o C• Fuel flow regulation system to fully utilize the

consumption of hydrogen as it reacts to changing load demand

• Nominal 48V. Range 42-72 V• 1.8kW power testing• Open circuit voltage 72 V• Slow response time ( chemical v/s electrical process )

FuelCell

Inverter

120Vac

N

-120Vac

Handshaking Signals

Fuel CellController

InverterController(DSP Based)

0-5V ON/OFF (Digital)

0-5V Ready/Trip (Digital)

0-5V AnalogPower Request

0-5V AnalogPower Available

If Power Request > Power Available : Battery Buffers the transientIf Power Request < Power Available : H2 flow is reducedBattery is used for start-up.

* Source : FEC2001

Review of the existing inverter topology

• Bulky transformer.• Large volume, High

cost.

DisadvantagesDisadvantages

Conventional sinusoidal output inverter topology Conventional sinusoidal output inverter topology solutionsolution

• Complex Structure. • High cost.• Low Efficiency.

DisadvantagesDisadvantages

Improved sinusoidal output inverter topology solutionImproved sinusoidal output inverter topology solution

Review of the existing inverter topology

Concept of High Frequency Link Transmission Technique

The objective is to reduce the size of transformer by The objective is to reduce the size of transformer by stepping up the switching frequencystepping up the switching frequency

The conventional bipolar SPWM waveform with low frequency component ( the reference ) included

High frequency link technique transforms the conventional SPWM waveform into high frequency format, small sized transformer is allowed

Concept of High Frequency Link Transmission Technique

The theoretical analysis of the harmonicsThe theoretical analysis of the harmonicsThe conventional SPWM waveform transmitted by bulky line frequency transformer ( fc=2kHz, fr=60Hz )

The waveform transmitted by compact high frequency transformer ( fc=2kHz, fr=60Hz)

∑=

++−

+=

k

i

wi

ww

wdc iin

iin

in

nV

nV1

)2

)()((sin)

2)(

)((sin)2

)(sin()

2()( π

θθ

θθ

θπ

∑=

++−

+−=

k

i

wi

ww

wdci iin

iin

in

nV

nV1

)2

)()((sin)

2)(

)((sin)2

)(sin()

2()1()( π

θθ

θθ

θπ

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000

200

Frequency (Hz)

Har

mon

ics

Am

plitu

de(V

)

300

0

V n( )

8.16 103×60 n f o⋅

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000

200

Frequency (Hz)

Har

mon

ics

Am

plitu

de (

V)

280

0

V1 n( )

8.16 103×60 n f o⋅

Since the waveform contains no low frequency component, a compact transformer is suitable for power transmission.

The Proposed Inverter Topology

The topology of high frequency link inverter

Drive Signal

Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

T1

LOAD

C1

S7 S8

S5 S6L

HighFrequency

Inverter

HighFrequency

TransformerCycloconverter Output Filter

Characteristics of the High Frequency Link Inverter

• No low frequency component exists in the waveform transmitted by transformer. A compact high frequency transformer is allowed for the transmission.

• The four switches in the secondary side of the transformer is operated mostly in line frequency which leads to low switching loss and high efficiency.

• The phase-shift control is used for the full bridge to realize the ZVS turning of the switches. The switching loss is greatly reduced compared with the conventional control scheme.

• Simple structure, lower loss and higher efficiency.

Operation Mode Analysis

State 1 State 2 State 3

State 4 State 5 State 6

State 7

+

-

+

-

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

+

-

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

0

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

-

+

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

+

-

+

-

Vdc+

-

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

0

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5 S6

S7 S8

HFTransformer

+

-

+

-

Duration I: positive output voltage, positive output current.

Operation Mode Analysis

Duration II: negative output voltage, positive output current.

State 1 State 3

State 4

State 2

State 5 State 6

State 7

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S 3

S 4

HFTransformer

-

+

S 5 S 6

S 7 S 8

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S 3

S 4

HFTransformer

S5 S 6

S7 S8

+

-

+

-Vdc

S 1

S 2

S3

S4

HFTransformer

-

+

S5 S 6

S7 S8

+

-Vdc

S 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

HFTransformer

S 5 S 6

S 7 S8

+

-

+

-Vdc

S 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

HFTransformer

S 5 S6

S 7 S 8

+

-Vdc

S 1

S 2

S 3

S 4

HFTransformer

S 5 S 6

S 7 S 8

0

+

-Vdc

S1

S2

S 3

S 4

HFTransformer

S 5 S 6

S 7 S 8

0

Simulation Circuit

3.8

0

-1

TR2

400u

P1

Logic Unit

U4

AND2

1

23

C1

10u

Cycloconverter

R11

1k

0

HF Transformer

K K1

COUPLING = 1K_Linear

L1 = Tr1L2 = Tr2L3 = Tr3

V13-0.1

+-

+

-

SC1

S

VON = 1mVVOFF = 0.0V

R10

12k

R8

200

TR1

5mH

0

0

0

ABS

0

0

+-

+

-

SP3

S

VON = 0.1VVOFF = 0.0V

DbreakD4

R16

1k

S1

Dbreak

D3

+-

+

-

SP2

S

VON = 0.1VVOFF = 0.0V

Filter

+-

+

-

S7

S

VON = 0.05mVOFF = 0.0V

D2

Current Sensing

D1

R2

1n

U3

OR2

1

23

R410

SB

Dbreak

DP1

R17

200

+ -

+ - S3 R71n

R6

1n

+-

+-

S2

V104V

S3

0

V61V

DbreakDP4

0

0

+ -

+ -S1

U9

AND2

1

23

V3-0.15V

0

+-

+-

S4

SA

0

0

C2

1000u

R15

1k

V8

+-

+

-

SP1

S

VON = 0.1VVOFF = 0.0V

U10

INV

1 2

S2

R14

1k

30

U8

OR2

1

23

DbreakDP3

S4

R18

200

R121k

U1

OR2

1

23

Pp

U2

AND2

1

23

R51000k

+-

+

-

SI1

S VON = 0.1VVOFF = 0.0V

R1

1n

U7

XOR

1

23

U5

OR2

1

23

V5

V7

DbreakDP2

+-

H1

H

(V(%IN1)-V(%IN2) ) *10000

13

2

Sda

TR3

5mH

V114V

U6

AND2

1

23

V148V

0.026

L2

100m0

V9

+-

+

-

SP4

S

VON = 0.1VVOFF = 0.0V

Full Bridge

R3

100k

0

Sdb

0

0

0

+-

+

-

S6

S

VON = 0.05mVOFF = 0.0V

0

R13

200

V24V

L1

3m

P2

PI Controller

Power stage includes full bridge inverter, HF transformer, cycloconverter and output filter. Control circuit includes output current&voltage sampling, PI controller and logic unit.

Simulation Result

Waveform transmitted by high frequency transformer

Spectrum of the waveform through transformer(Switching Frequency: 30kHz)

Output voltage and current

The spectrum of the transmitted waveform shows that only high frequency component exists. Therefore, a compact high frequency transformer can be used for power transmission.

Output Voltage Waveform Harmonic Analysis

Total Harmonic Distortion ( THD )= 2%

The close loop control provides clean output voltage waveform.

Simulation Result ( Con. )

Drive Signal: ( Switches in the primary side and secondary side )

The secondary side switches operated partly at line frequency which reduced the switching loss generally.

Voltage across the switches

No huge spikes found across the switches.

Simulation Result ( Con. )

Design Specifications for Inverter•• Output power ratingOutput power rating 400W continuous, single phase.400W continuous, single phase.•• Output voltageOutput voltage 120V nominal120V nominal•• Output FrequencyOutput Frequency 60 Hz 60 Hz ±± 0.1 Hz. 0.1 Hz. •• Carrier frequency Carrier frequency 42kHz42kHz•• Input source Input source Nominal rating of 48 V dc.Nominal rating of 48 V dc.•• Overall efficiencyOverall efficiency Higher than 90% for resistive load.Higher than 90% for resistive load.•• Total harmonic distortion Total harmonic distortion Output voltage THD: less than 5%Output voltage THD: less than 5%

when supplying a standard nonlinear when supplying a standard nonlinear test loadtest load

Device Used for the prototype

•• Primary full bridge MOSFET Primary full bridge MOSFET SSH10N90A•• Secondary side IGBT Secondary side IGBT IRG4BC30UD•• Transformer Center tapped at the secondary Transformer Center tapped at the secondary side side

Power stage:

Control circuit:•• Phase shift controller Phase shift controller UC3875 UC3875 phase shift controller for full bridgephase shift controller for full bridge•• Driver IC Driver IC IR2110IR2110 for primary full bridgefor primary full bridge

UC1708JUC1708J for secondary for secondary cycloconvertercycloconverter•• Optoisolator Optoisolator 4N254N25 for the for the cycloconverter cycloconverter driverdriver

Phase-shift control signal for the full bridge in the primary side

Phase-shift control enable the switches in the full bridge operated at ZVS, the switching loss is greatly reduced

Experimental Result

Waveform transmitted by HF transformer

The waveform contains no low frequency component which facilitate the power transmission

Experimental Result ( Con. )

The unipolar SPWM waveform and the output voltage waveform

The output filter converts the unipolar SPWM pulse series into the sinusoidal output waveform

Experimental Result ( Con. )

The future for cycloconverter in fuel cell application

• The phase shift control scheme enable the switches shift at ZVS, the total switching loss is generally reduced. The cycloconverter enable the swtiches operated mainly at line frequency. The switching loss dropped furtherly. The whole system efficiency is high compared with the conventional cycloconverter system.

• The high frequency operation reduced the size of the transformer, the whole system size is greatly reduced.

• The front side communication between the inverter and the fuel cell enable them work in harmony in the case of load variation.

• No high component current and voltage spikes. Together with the low loss of the switches, the inverter is expected to handle high power and suitable for high power applications.

How to accelerate the deployment of fuel cell distributed generation for home applications ?

• Increased funding and awareness programs by state and federal agencies.

• Industry must play a major role in funding fuel cell based projects and pursue aggressive fuel cell R&D strategies.

• Educational campaign is needed to generate student interest in fuel cells (example: Future Energy Challenge)

• Fuel Cell experts need to speak more.• Increase the role of professional organizations

(IEEE,IEE…etc) to promote special issues on fuel cell applications, modeling, inverter design,…etc

Research Focus at UCF

• Develop an understanding of Fuel cell modeling • Identify and understand issues that affect the coupling

between the fuel cell and the power inverter.• Explore new inverter topologies and suitable controls• Expand the above finding to similar sources like

photovoltaics• Participate in FEC 2003 Inverter Competition.• Minor detail: $$$ - Secure funding - $$$ ?

FEC2003 Inverter Specifications for UCF

• Input Voltage : 22-41 VDC, 29 VDC nom. ,275 A max. from fuel cell.

• Output Voltage : 120 V/240 V nominal (split-phase)., 60 Hz ±0.1 Hz.

• Output power capability – nominal : 10 kW continuous, total (5 kW continuous @ displacement factor 0.7, leading or lagging, max.

• Output voltage harmonic quality : (THD) - less than 5% when supplying a standard nonlinear test load

• Maximum input current ripple : 3% rms of rated current • Overall energy efficiency : Higher than 90% for 5.0 kW resistive load with

minimal efficiency degradation up to peak power and down to minimum power.

• Protection : Industry standard• Communication interface : Control communication between fuel cell and

inverter is through RS232 • Manufacturing cost : Less than US$40/kW for the 10 kW design in

high-volume production.

Concluding RemarksØ Many years have been invested in fuel cell research and development in

federal and industrial Labs!Ø Fuel cell research and funding activities are in the increase.Ø DOE FY 03 Fuel Cell Budget $104.5 MillionØ The US market is expected to reach $3 billion next year.Ø No doubt Fuel Cell will continue to emerge as an important source of

clean energy for residential applications.Ø 2kW – 10kW covers the residential segment and 40% of US power

consumption is domestic.Ø Hence with the availability of alternate power sources, we need very

inexpensive, reliable power interface systems.Ø These systems can be used to provide solution for remote power

generation, backup generation and distributed generation.Ø With more than 2 billion people without grid power, connecting Fuel Cell

powered sources to the grid will continue to grow and give a boost to the concept of net metering.

Ø Fuel cell installed annual generating capacity is currently 1.5-2 GW and expected to reach 15GW in the next few years.

Ø Projected global demand for transportation fuel cell will reach $9 billion in 2007.


Recommended