The Development of an Acute Hip Fracture Ward
Mr J A BallantyneCons Ortho Surgeon
The development of an acute hip fracture ward
• Background • Business Case• Intended benefits• Sustainability
Hip Fractures in Fife (1982-2009)Hip Fracture Incidence; 65 and over; FIFE
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Hip
Frac
ture
s
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
Hip Fracture Rate per 1000
Hip Fractures Rate per 1000
NHS Fife Trauma configuration
Present• 2 trauma wards
– 23 beds each• All trauma admitted next
available bed• Hip fractures distributed
across 2 wards• Hip fracture resources divided
across 2 wards– CoE (P/T Staff Grade, 1 CoE
session)– AHP input limited to 5-6/7
Planned• Acute Hip Fracture ward• General trauma ward• CoE resources concentrated
on acute hip fracture ward– 2 sessions CoE Cons– P/T CoE Staff Grade– 2 ESP Fragility Nurses– Increased AHP input to allow 7
day service– Weekly Ortho Con ward round
(3 dedicated consultants)
Background….an ongoing process beginning in 2009
2009: Introduced a hip fracture patient pathway• Consultant engagement
2010: Introduced a Enhanced Care Area for Hip Fractures• Patients post hip fracture surgery optimised• Increased nursing care, careful fluid balance, reg. review• Introduced with some naivety• Staffing numbers incorrect
– Unable to complete intended assessments• Required regular transfer of patients between bed spaces
– not good practice in the cognitively impaired– Inefficient use of nursing staff
Our first attempt….why did they fail?
• Ward changes poorly planned– Recognized need for improvement– Failure to engage fully with MDT re changes
• Ortho Consultant engagement/interest?• Limited CoE input• Management buy in….
– Hip fractures not a government priority– Other competing targets took priority
• Lack of national targets– E&W had NHFD – tariff driven care
2012: Development of Orthogeriatric services for Patients Sustaining Fragility Fractures in NHS Fife: the need to comply with national
standards
Best Practice In Hip Fracture care: The case for Orthogeriatrics in the care of fragility fractures: Published Guidance and Drivers for Change• Blue Book• National Hip Fracture Database• Nice Guideline (June 2011)• Sign Guideline 111 (June 2009)• SHFA
Present Management of Hip Fracture in NHS Fife
What Care Model to adopt?
Recommended Model
Does Orthogeriatric Input make a difference?
What level of Orthogeriatric Consultant support is required?
Possible Models and Patient Flow
Benefits of Improved Orthogeriatric Levels of Care– Cost savings to planned care directorate– Foundation Trainees Support– GMC response to patient safety concerns (May 2012)
Funding the Orthogeriatric Service
Conclusion
Conclusion
“The establishment of an orthogeriatric unit. This is the preferred option and the current recommended model of care from the BGS……. high level features in this sort of model are pre op assessment, the potential development of specialist roles such as hip fracture nurses…………chances of a discharge home are felt to be optimized using this model “
2013- present…..re-allocation of resources
• Started the development of an Acute Hip Fracture ward
– Admitted under shared care– Admitted directly to the hip
fracture ward– Return to ward post op– Post op rehab led by specialist MDT
team– Care pathways
• Staffing at this time– 1 sessions CoE Cons time (MDT)– 1 P/T CoE staff Grade
• Regular MDT team meetings
• Ortho Staff Grade salary 1 (retiral)– Appointment of 2 Fragility Nurse ESP– Work alongside CoE medical staff– Provide CGA, peri-op medical management
• Secondment HAN nurse to support training of the ESPs
• Ortho Staff Grade salary 2 (retiral)– Appoint CoE Consultant P/T– Work absorbed by Ortho Cons
• No applicants• Reflects national shortage CoE consultants• Alternative solutions preferred by local CoE Cons
• Additional CoE Cons session– Presently 2 CoE Cons Ward rounds
• Cons Ortho Ward round weekly– Additional to routine trauma ward rounds– Aim to provide consistancy of decision making by a core
of 3 Ortho Cons
….late 2013
• Made lots of local departmental changes to try and improve service– Converting surgical salaries to medical/nursing
• Still lacked the final impetus to take us to the acute hip fracture ward
SOSDG Hip Fracture Care Work strand
• Scottish Standards of Care for hip fracture patients (2013)
• National monthly snap audits
• Provided the drivers for change• Evidenced areas we needed to do better
– Allowed business case to be made to address these areas• Management engagement – national audit
– Well supported in making change
e-Health Information Services Department
05
1015202530354045
Hip fractures admissions in FY 2009/10 to 2013/14 split by time of admissions
2009-102010-112011-122012-132013-14
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Day of the week of a Hip fracture procedure from FY 2009/10 to FY 2013/14
2009-102010-112011-122012-132013-14
Business Case for the acute hip fracture ward
Focused on areas in the snap audits where we performed poorly
• LOSx• Post Op mobilization• CoE input
• Demonstrate areas of improvement against national data
• Comparison to National Hip Fracture Guidelines
Acute Hip Fracture Ward
• Concentrate available resource to single area
• Allow development of patient care pathways
• Develop team dedicated to hip fracture patient care
• Aim to reduce LOSx– Reduce dependence on downstream
beds– Increase patients discharged directly
home• Cost savings in terms of hip fracture
care
SOSDG funding
Present• OT 5 out of 6 day working
– Working to capacity– Staffing levels not allow 7 day
input• Physio 6 out 7
– Working to capacity (Trauma/Elective)
– Input aimed at those DC withing 48 hrs (ie ERP)
Planned• Additional 2 generic AHP
assistants– Allow 7 day input OT/Physio
• 2nd physio working Saturday and Sunday– Work with the assist AHPs to
increase ability to clinically prioritise post op mobilisation (elective/trauma)
• Increased Nurse staffing levels
Measure impact
National Audit• SOSDG Audit• LOSx
– Recognition of other factors• Physio time to initial assessment
Local Audit• Physio – audit reasons for delay in first
assessment• OT – proportion assessment achieved on day
1,2 and 3• Proportion of patients transferred to
downstream bed (present 51% - aim 20%)• Impact of hip fracture ward on ICASS
– 30% patient presently discharged through ICASS
– 15% DC directly home– Local audit ICASS/DC Hub
• Audit of numbers of boarding patients from other directorates
– Potential for remuneration form emergency care and resultant true cost saving to planned care
Sustainability
• Run as pilot for 1 yr• Report back to Senior Management Team at 1yr
– Evidenced by reduced LOSx– Reduction in patient bed days for NOF♯– Increased numbers patients DC home– Increased use of ICASS– Show efficiency of use of current resources
• If benefits confirmed, commitment to recurring funding agreed by NHS Fife
Ongoing challenges……..
• Limited CoE input well below levels required for these patients– Alternative solutions using Fragility Nurse ESP– 7 day consultant led CoE care still a dream
• Social Care issues locally/lack of down stream beds– Potential impact on LOSx
• Staff apprehension regarding ward change– Reinforce the benefits of good care– Demonstrate the impact of increased medical input
• Showing actual cost saving with improved care– reduced LOSx savings offset by boarding patients form other directorates– Need to recognise the cost of boarding patients into trauma beds
• Prioritisation of hip fractures on trauma list– More interesting trauma cases often take priority
• Showing benefits of the ward beyond LOSx– Demonstrating benefits of the softer end points eg quality of care, patient satisfaction– Softer outcomes may not be shown in terms of cost saving
• Medical support of other Fragility Fracture patients– Concentration of present resources on Hip fractures– Need to develop pathways of care for non hip fracture fragility patients
MDT effort……
• Nursing (Maureen Speedie, Eileen Hanlon, Dorothy Letham, Karen Peacock, Andrea Bendowski)
• OT (Elaine Murray)• Physios (Janet Macdonald, Liz McMullen, Karen Gray)• CoE (Jo Hadoke, Sue Pound, Morag Paterson, Marie Williams, John McKenzie)• Orthopaedic (Andy Ballantyne, Ed Dunstan)• Planned Care Management (Susan Fraser, Fiona Cameron)• Emergency Medicine (Maggie Currer)• Anaesthetics• SOSDG Audit Nurse (Jan Wood)
Thank you….
CoE requirements in an orthogeriatric ward
‘An estimate of two direct clinical care sessions per week for each 100 hip fracture patients per year of senior Orthogeriatrician time is required to provide a basic service.’
‘However, it is essential that there is a Consultant Geriatrician involved in the day to day running of the service to provide continuity of care, in making difficult decisions regarding fitness for theatre, in complex discharge planning and in end of life decision-making.’
The involvement of two Orthogeriatricians sharing the workload along with their other commitments should be considered and would provide a balanced job plan and ensure adequate cross cover when necessary.’
June 2010 BGS Newsletter5