Date post: | 31-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sharon-hardin |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Preparing Students for Senior Design with a Rapid Design Challenge
Joe Tranquillo
Biomedical Engineering
Bucknell University
BME-IDEA 2009
The course was good, but…
Students not used to courses like design
1st semester can be unsatisfying to students
All projects different – keep class unified
Need to balance planning vs. building
First exposure to entire formal step-by-step engineering design process
Some students hesitant to fabricate
The Design Challenge (DC)
Challenge: Design and build a liquid infusion device for use in a 3rd-world rural clinic that empties a 60 cc syringe in 10 minutes.
Limitations:1. No AC power 4.$100 budget2. No intervention 5. No IP protection3. Restricted shopping 6. ~3 weeks
.
+
Design Build Test Refine
Step 1/5: Who are the users and what do they need?
TOPIC(S) LECTURE TOPICS
ASSIGNMENT
•Users Needs
•Solution Concepts
•Users
•Users Needs
•Objectives
•Objective Tree
•ID Users
•ID Users Needs
•Objective Tree
•Preliminary Solution Concepts
Step 2/5: What it should do and how well it should do it?
TOPIC(S) LECTURE TOPICS
ASSIGNMENT
•Functions
•Specifications
•Functions
•Specifications
•Measurable specifications
•ID functions from needs & objective tree
•Categorize functions
•Determine 5 or more specifications
•Categorize specifications
Step 3/5: The best solution and how to get there
TOPIC(S) LECTURE TOPICS
ASSIGNMENT
•Identifying best solution
•Planning
•Choosing best solution (decision making methods)
•Good documentation
•Effective meetings
•Present all possible solutions
•Explain how best was identified
•Gantt Chart
•Sign-off meeting
If you build it,
it will work…
Build Prototypes!!
Step 4/5: It’s done! But it doesn’t work! What now?
TOPIC(S) LECTURE TOPICS
ASSIGNMENT
•Preliminary test results
•Planned changes to system
•Importance of iterative cycle in design (plan, build, test, analyze, reevaluate, modify design)
•Effective memos
•Build prototype
•Test prototype
•Report test results
•Analyze test results
•Planned changes w/ justifications
Step 5/5: Evaluate the design process
TOPIC(S) LECTURE TOPICS
ASSIGNMENT
•Evaluate process (look backwards)
•Importance of looking backwards
•Info learned here can be brought into senior design
•Compare solution to objectives, functions and specifications
•Evaluate team performance
•Reflect on individual performance
The DC Final Event
The Contest1. Each team explains their solution and runs their system under supervision 3. Closest to ten minutes winner4. Closest to 6 cc/min winner5. Most creative solution winner6. Overall winning team7. Prizes awarded
The Wrap-Up1. Congratulatory feedback 2. Transfer to actual design3. Build on positive feelings
NEXT STEP: Form year-long design teams & GO!
The 2008-2009 Teams and Their Systems
J. Tranquillo and D. Cavanagh, “Preparing Students for Senior Design with a Rapid Design Challenge” Proceedings of ASEE 2009
BME at BucknellMission: To provide a high quality, hands-on
education to a select group of undergraduates
Enrollment: 54 students in four-year program; 3 classes of alumni
Faculty: 5.8 FTEs
Degrees: BS in BME, minor in BME
Facilities: Hybrid Instructional Facility, Biomedical Teaching/Project Lab, College Facilities
BME Design at Bucknell Two-semester sequence
− 1st semester to identify problem and plan− 2nd semester to fabricate, test & deliver
Teams of 2-4 students matched by interest
Clinical Mentors from Geisinger Health System
Faculty adviser and course coordinator
Teams identify clinical problem, run meetings, manage budget, meet deadlines, etc….. They are in charge
First offering in 2006-2007
The DC Sales Pitch
On first day of class:
1. DC syllabus
2. IDEO video
3. Student-selected teams
4. Set 1st team meeting time
5. GO! -> 3 weeks to build, test, and delivera medical device.
-> Follow 5 steps process
Did the Design Challenge help?Faculty Observed Benefits
1. Students engaged on day one
2. Students designed twice in the year
3. DC acted as a common experience
Faculty Observed Limitations
4. Takes time away from full design project – students not always see the value of DC
5. Not all students realize the transfer of skills from the DC to the design project.
Did the Design Challenge help?Summary of Student Evaluations
1. Most students were able to identify weaknesses in their DC efforts and made suggestions on how to improve
2. Students found that a ‘simple’ project with clear goals was effective to experience design process
3. Students were eager to begin the actual design project
4. When asked about the value of the DC, the average score of 31 students was 3.9/5.0.
Broader Application IdeasAlternative Implementations
1. Introductory engineering courses
2. High school courses
3. Service learning courses
4. Courses for non-engineers
Alternative Formats
5. Vary the objective of the DC
6. Vary the limitations
7. Focus on specific aspects of design process
8. Many more…..