EPR of Spin Transitions in Complexes of Cu(hfac)2 with tert-ButylPyrazolylnitroxides
Irina Drozdyuk
International Tomography Center, Novosibirsk, Russia
Cu(hfac)2LBu0.5C7H16
Cu(hfac)2LPr
Cu(hfac)2LBu0.5C7H8
Cu(hfac)2LEt
Cu(hfac)2LBu0.5C8H10
Cu(hfac)2LBu0.5C7H16
N
NR
N
N
O
O
O
Cu
O
O
O
CF3
CF3F3C
F3C
LR Cu(hfac)2
• Very sensitive to the radical structure and the organic solvents
Family of Cu(hfac)2LR
T=293 K T=203 K T=115 KStrongly-coupled state (SS)
Weakly-coupled state (WS)
J »kT
J «kT
• The flip of the Jahn-Teller axes in the triads
Structural rearrangements and spin transitions
Izv. An. 11 (2004) 2304
Why do we need it?
Applicable facilities Features of Cu(hfac)2LR:
Nanometer scale
Room temperature
Ability to control and switch transition
Combining of properties
Nanosecond time of relaxation
Light-induced transition
Molecular switch
Dense storage of information (STT-RAM)
Logical schemes (10-17 J, 1 ns)
Spin transistor (100% polarisation)
Accumulator of energy
low-temperature spectrum high-temperature spectrum
S=3/2
S=1/2
S=1/2
gc=(2gR+gCu)/3
gb=gCu
ga=(4gR-gCu)/3
J
2J
EPR of Cu(hfac)2LR
Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007) 11405
TriadCu2
TriadCu2
Magnetic field, Т
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
Magnetic field, Т
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
• Finding new functional ligands • New radicals absorbe less light
Background and motivation
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47 (2008) 6897
400 500 600 700 800 9000.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Wavelength, nm
Ab
sorb
an
ce
Cu(hfac)2LR
Cu(hfac)2LR
tert
590=2230
590=420
N
NR
N
N
O
O
O
Cu
O
O
O
CF3
CF3F3C
F3C
LR Cu(hfac)2
NN
N O
R
LRtertLR
Background and motivation
??
?
JACS 132 (2010) 13886
• Finding new functional ligands • New radicals absorbing less light
• Tuning various intercluster exchange interactions
Experimental dependence μeff(T), magnetic field = 1 Т
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3501.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
eff
(B.M.)
T (K)
(●) [Cu(hfac)2LtertPr ]n
(▼) [Cu(hfac)2LtertEt ]n
(■) [Cu(hfac)2LtertMe ]n
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
O
N
N
N
O
Researching compounds
Installation
Bruker Elexsys E580 EPR-spectrometer X/Q band
• Cryostat
• Helium cooling system
• Temperature control system
• Q-band
• T= 4-293 К
• Polycrystalline powder samples
• Averaging over axial angle
Conditions of experiment
• CW - mode
200 К
150 К
120 К
100 К
75 К
Magnetic field, Т
293 К
240 К
200 К
160 К
120 К
80 К
Magnetic field, Т
293 К
200 К
145 К
100 К
75 К
Magnetic field, Т
250 300 350 400 450
B / мТ
T=260 KT=140 KT=90 K
Typical EPR-spectrum of Cu(hfac)2LR
• Principal changing of EPR-spectra of Cu(hfac)2LtertR
Experimental results
Cu(hfac)2LtertPrCu(hfac)2Ltert
EtCu(hfac)2LtertMe
Jinter=0
Jinter0
Magnetic field, mТ
Jinter=0
Jinter0
Magnetic field, mТ
Triad
Cu2
-∑2JinterSiCu2Si
R1,2
Intercluster exchange
• An approach of the modified Bloch equations
• Spin Hamiltonian of the systemJ
2J
WSSS
Theoretical modeling
TriadCu2 TriadCu2
, where
erCuCuCuRRCuCuRRR HSBgSSSJSBgSSBgH int
22111 ˆ2ˆ 2121
ABBAAA
A MiGGidtdG
012
11
BAABBB
B MiGGidtdG
012
11
yxMiMG BA 2,12,1,
2
002 ,
34,||Cutriad
Cutriad
CuRa
MM
gggkTJ
2
002 3,33
32,||Cutriad
Cutriad
CuRc
MM
gggkTJ
200 К
150 К
120 К
100 К
75 К
293 К
240 К
200 К
160 К
120 К
80 К
293 К
200 К
145 К
100 К
75 К
Results of theoretical modeling
Compound T, K t, T2triad, T2
Cu2, q
´10-11 s ´10-11 s ´10-7 s
Cu(hfac)2LtertMe 75 2 30 4 77
Cu(hfac)2LtertMe 200 10 11 40 54
Cu(hfac)2LtertEt 80 1.1 22 40 77
Cu(hfac)2LtertEt 293 10 8 4 54
Cu(hfac)2LtertPr 75 1.1 15 40 77
The set of parametersEstimation of intercluster exchange J inter :
• observed line shape
|Jinter|>0.1 cm-1|gA,C – gCu2|>1/ 1/2Jinter
Magnetic field, Т Magnetic field, Т Magnetic field, Т
Compound |Jinter|, cm-1
Cu(hfac)2LtertMe 0.15
Cu(hfac)2LtertEt 0.15
Cu(hfac)2LtertPr -
Compound |Jinter|, cm-1
Cu(hfac)2LtertMe 0.8
Cu(hfac)2LtertEt 1.5
Cu(hfac)2LtertPr 1.5
• theoretical modelingWS SS
Cu(hfac)2LtertPrCu(hfac)2Ltert
EtCu(hfac)2LtertMe
• The first EPR-study of new thermo-switchable molecular magnets [Cu(hfac)2LtertR ]n
• These compounds differ from those studied previously by the structure of a nitroxide ligand. Replacement of the nitronyl nitroxide substituent in LR by tert-butylnitroxide one supresses the intercluster exchange pathway between different polymer chains, and leads also to an ehancement of intercluster exchange interaction (up to a few cm-1)
• Despite the exchange narrowing of the spectra due to the stronger intercluster interaction in these complexes, observed line shapes are significantly different depending on the spin state of a triad (WS or SS).
• Theoretical modeling has confirmed the assigment of the observed spectra to the complexes with the triad in the one of these two spin states.
• This investigation explains the main trends of EPR applied for the caracterization of phase spin transitions in new compounds and creates the basis for their future studies.
Conclusion
Thank you for your attention!