+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3%...

Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3%...

Date post: 06-Mar-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
14
Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra Orissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board Odisha, India 30 August 2017 Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in Odisha, India
Transcript
Page 1: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Prasanta Kumar MohapatraOrissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board

Odisha, India

30 August 2017

Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in Odisha, India

Page 2: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Contents

• Sanitation service in urban Odisha

• Faecal Sludge Management in Odisha

• Institutional & financial arrangements for FSM

• Odisha urban sanitation policy

• Key challenges in FSM implementation

Page 3: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Sanitation in Urban Odisha

ST

URBAN

POP.

6 mill

Sewerage

(11.5%)

Open Defecation

(33.2%)

Safely emptied

& transported

Unsafely emptied/ overflow & illegally disposed

Effectively treated 4 %

On Site (55.3%) 6 %

Containment Emptying Transport TreatmentReuse/

Disposal

• Public Toilet=2%• Pit Latrine=4.2%• Septic tank=45%• Others=8.3%

Not treated

Not treated

Page 4: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Impact on Odisha’s River health

Bay of Bengal

• 112 Towns

• 99 Towns in 11 River Basins

• 680 Million litres/day domestic wastewater discharged untreated

Page 5: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Water Supply Intake location

HirakudReservoir

Page 6: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Water Supply Intake location

Page 7: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

FSM Planning in Odisha

FSM

Sewerage + FSM towns

Bay of

Bengal

Population Range Number of

Towns

Population

(Million)

%

100,000 & more 9 3.08 45

25,000 to 100,000 103 3.80 55

Total 112 6.88 100

Population of Odisha: 46 MillionPopulation in urban areas: 6.88 Million (15%)

Page 8: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Faecal Sludge Treatment Process

Parameters COD (mg/l) BOD (mg/l) SS (mg/l) pH NH4-N (mg/l)

N-Total (mg/l)

PO4-P (mg/l)

Faecal coliform (MPN/100 ml)

Raw FS in 9 towns 7250 - 14800 1400 - 2940 1850 - 6900 6.5 - 7.07 102 - 215 350 - 730 1 - 5 48000 - 80000

Standards for treated effluent

50 10 10 6.5 – 9.0 5 10 2 < 230

Manure Nutrient reuse

Q=24 m3/week Drying time=2 weeks Mass=7203 Kg/week Mass=5042 Kg/week Treated effluent=77.5 m3/d

SS conc=60 g/l

Q=75 m3/d Q=13 m3/fortnight

SS conc=5 g/l V=6.5 m3

Q=6.5 m3/d

Q=71 m3/d

SS conc=1.6 g/l

COD=3829 mg/l

BOD=1532 mg/l

Q=77.5 m3/d Q=77.5 m3/d Volume=77.5 m3

AS HRT=7.3 hr COD=288 mg/l COD=57 mg/l

ABR HRT=32.4 hr BOD=70 mg/l BOD=10 mg/l

AF HRT=18.4 hr

Sludge retention time (SRT)= 7 days HRT=2.4 days HRT=3.7 days HRT=1 day

Settling-thickening Tank Anaerobic Baffled Reactor Planted Horz. Gravel Filter Maturation Pond

Sludge Drying Bed

Page 9: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Isometric view of Treatment Facility

Page 10: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Financial flows along Service Chain

Household Cesspool Vehicle Operator

Treatment Plant Operator

Farm/

Landscape

Urban Local Body Sewerage Board

Government

Service Flows

Financial Flows

Access to ToiletEmptying &Transport

Treatment Disposal/

reuse

Sanitation Tax

Incentive for Toilet

Fee for lease of Cesspool vehicle O&M

Grant Grant

Emptying fee

Page 11: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Institutional Roles and Responsibilities

• Provides budgetary support for capex and O&M of FSTP to Sewerage Board.

• Provides incentive grant to ULBs for improving access to toilet (Clean India Mission)

• Develops and notifies FSM policy, strategy and guidelines

Odisha Government

• Transfers Swachh Bharat Mission (Clean India Mission) incentive to eligible beneficiaries to construct toilets

• Lease cesspool trucks for a fee

• Collects sanitation tax

Urban Local Body

• Prepares DPRs, builds FSTPs and provides technical advice to Govt. and support to Urban Local Bodies

• Assists construction and O&M of FSTPSewerage Board

Page 12: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Elements of Odisha Urban Sanitation Policy, 2017

Odisha Urban

Sanitation Policy

FSM

Institution

M&E

Menstrual Hygiene

MSW

Wastewater

ROLES• Legislation • Technology

selection • Engaging informal/

private sector• Capacity building• Monitoring &

Evaluation • Encourage

competition

GOALS

• Eliminate Open defecation

• Safely manage Faecal sludge

• Cities do not pollute rivers

• Safety standards and guidelines are followed

Page 13: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Key Challenges

1. Early selection of land for treatment facility is key to the FSM programme

- FSTP can be set up near solid waste management designated sites

- Awareness on FSM among stakeholders led to resolution of land issue

2. Participation of private operators

- In small ULBs, cesspool vehicle operation is not financially attractive due to fewer

trips/day). Optimum number for breakeven is 4 trips/day.

- Requires legislation, standardization of septic tanks, enforcement etc.

3. FSM requires Govt. support

- For Capex & Opex, Capacity Development, IEC etc.

Page 14: Processes and Challenges of Faecal Sludge Management in ......• Septic tank=45% • Others=8.3% Not treated Not treated Impact on Odisha’s River health Bay of Bengal • 112 Towns

Thank You

Contact:[email protected]

Photo: Wheel of Sun Temple, Odisha


Recommended