+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Program Assessment: A Process From Start to Finish RJ Ohgren – Office of Judicial Affairs Mandalyn...

Program Assessment: A Process From Start to Finish RJ Ohgren – Office of Judicial Affairs Mandalyn...

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: stuart-harrington
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
30
Program Assessment: A Process From Start to Finish RJ Ohgren – Office of Judicial Affairs Mandalyn Swanson, M.S. – Center for Assessment and Research Studies James Madison University
Transcript

Program Assessment: A Process From Start to FinishRJ Ohgren – Office of Judicial AffairsMandalyn Swanson, M.S. – Center for Assessment and Research StudiesJames Madison University

Session Outcomes

By the end of this session, attendees will be able to:

• Explain how assessment design informs program design• Describe the “Learning Assessment Cycle”• Express the difference between a goal, learning objective

and program objective• Identify effective frameworks to design learning

outcomes• Define fidelity assessment and recognize its role in the

Learning Assessment Cycle

By The NumbersWhere We Were v. Where We Wanted to Be

Why Assess?

It’s simple:• The assessment cycle keeps us accountable and intentional• We want to determine if the benefits we anticipated occur • Are changes in student performance due to our program?

If we don’t assess:• Programming could be ineffective – we won’t know• Our effective program could be terminated – we have no proof

it’s working

Typical Assessment• We’ll, we’ve got to do a program. Let’s put some activities

together.• Let’s ask them questions about what we hope they get out of

it afterwards.• Um…let’s ask if they liked the program too. And let’s track

attendance.

• Survey says….well, they didn’t really learn what we’d hoped. But they liked it? And a good bit of people came? Success!

Proper Assessment

What do we want students to know, think or do as a result of this program?

• Let’s define goals and objectives that get at what we want students to know, think or do.

• What specific, measurable things could show that we’re making progress towards these goals and objectives?

• What activities can we incorporate to get at those goals and objectives?

We have a program!

How are these approaches different?

Learning Assessment CycleEstablish Program

Objectives

Create & Map Programming to

Objectives

Select and Design Instrument

Implementation Fidelity

Collect Objective Information

Analyze & Maintain

Information

Use Information

Program Goals vs. Learning Goals

Goals, Objectives, & Items

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Item

Goa

l Obj

ectiv

e

Obj

ectiv

e

Obj

ectiv

e

Obj

ectiv

e

Goals v. Objectives

• Goals can be seen as the broad, general expectations for the program• Objectives can be seen as the means by

which those goals are met• Items measure our progress towards those

objectives and goals

Goals vs. Objectives

Goal• General expectation of

student (or program) outcome• Can be broad and vague• Example: Students will

understand and/or recognize JMU alcohol and drug policies.

Objective• Statement of what

students should be able to do or how they should change developmentally as a result of the program

• More specific; measurable• Example: Upon completion

of the BTN program, 80% of students will be able to identify 2 JMU Policies relating to alcohol.

Putting it All Together

MISSION

GOAL GOAL GOAL

Objective Objective ObjectiveObjectiveObjectiveObjective

Assessment Assessment Assessment AssessmentAssessment

By The Numbers Program Goal• Goal: To provide a positive classroom experience for students

sanctioned to By the Numbers• Objective: 80% of students will report that the class met or

exceeded their expectations of the class.• Item: Class Evaluation #15 – Overall, I feel like this class…

• Objective: 80% of students will agree (or better) with the statement “the facilitators presented the material in an non-judgemental way.”• Item: Class Evaluation #5.5 – The facilitators presented the material in a

non-judgemental way. • Objective: 60% of students will report an engaging classroom

experience.• Item: Class Evaluation #5.1 – The facilitators encouraged participation.• Item: Class Evaluation #5.4 – The facilitators encouraged discussion

between participants.

1 of 3

By The Numbers Learning Goal• Goal: To ensure student understanding and/or recognition of

JMU alcohol and drug policies.• Objective: After completing BTN, 80% of students will be able to

identify 2 JMU Policies relating to alcohol.• Objective: …identify the circumstances for parental notification.• Objective: …identify the parties able to apply for amnesty in a

given situation.• Objective: …identify the geographic locations in which JMU will

address an alcohol/drug violation.• Objective: …articulate the three strike policy.

1 of 5

By The Numbers Learning Goal• Goal: To ensure student understanding and/or recognition of

concepts surrounding alcohol.• Objective: After completing BTN, 60% of students will be able to

provide the definition of a standard drink for beer, wine, and liquor.

• Objective: …identify the definition for BAC.• Objective: …describe the relationship between tolerance and

BAC.• Objective: …identify at least 2 factors that influence BAC.• Objective… identify the definition of the point of diminishing

returns.• Objective: …identify how the body processes alcohol and its

effects on the body.

2 of 5

By The Numbers Learning Goal• Goal: To ensure student understanding and/or recognition of

concepts surrounding alcohol consumption.• Objective: After completing BTN, 80% of students will be able to

correctly identify the definition of the point of diminishing returns.• Item: Assessment Question #12, #29• Activity: Tolerance Activity, Point of Diminishing Returns discussion

• Objective: After completing BTN, 80% of students will be able to identify how the body processes alcohol and its effects on the body.• Item: Assessment Question #8, #9, #10• Activity: Alcohol in the Body Activity

Developing Learning Outcomes• Should be Student Focused – Worded to express what the

student will learn, know, or do (Knowledge, Attitude, or Behavior)

• Should be Reasonable – should reflect what is possible to accomplish with the program

• Should be Measurable – “Know” and “understand” are not measurable. The action one can take from knowing or understanding is.

• Should have Success Defined – What is going to be considered passing?

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Less complex

More complex

Level Description

1. Knowledge Recognize facts, terms, and principles

2. Comprehension Explain or summarize in one’s own words

3. Application Relate previously learned material to new situations

4. Analysis Understand organizational structure of material; draw comparisons and relationships between elements

5. Synthesis Combine elements to form a new original entity

6. Evaluation Make judgments about the extent to which material satisfies criteria

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s Level Verbs

1. Knowledge match, recognize, select, compute, define, label, name, describe

2. Comprehension restate, elaborate, identify, explain, paraphrase, summarize

3. Application give examples, apply, solve problems using, predict, demonstrate

4. Analysis outline, draw a diagram, illustrate, discriminate, subdivide

5. Synthesis compare, contrast, organize, generate, design, formulate

6. Evaluation support, interpret, criticize, judge, critique, appraise

The ABCD Method

• A = Audience• What population are you assessing?

• B = Behavior• What is expected of the participant?

• C = Conditions• Under what circumstances is the behavior to be

performed?• D = Degree• How well must the behavior be performed? To what

level?

From “How to Write Clear Objectives”

• Objective: After completing BTN, 80% of students will be able to describe the relationship between tolerance and BAC.

Audience

By the Numbers Participants

Behavior

Describe relationship between tolerance and BAC

Condition

After taking the class

Degree 80%

The ABCD Method: Example

Common Mistakes

Vague behavior• Example: Have a thorough understanding of

the university honor code.

Gibberish• Example: Have a deep awareness and

thorough humanizing grasp on…

Not Student-Focused• Example: Train students on how and where to

find information.

Program ImplementationGive the program you say you will. How?

Pre Test(Low Item Score)

Program

Post Test(High Item Score)

Pre Test(Low Item Score)

Program

Post Test(Low Item Score)

Fidelity Assessment • Are you doing what you say you’re doing?

• Helps to ensure your program is implemented as you intended

• Links learning outcomes to programming

• Helps to answer “why” we aren’t observing the outcomes we think we should be observing

Fidelity Components• Program Differentiation• How are the many components of your program

different from one another?• Adherence• Was your program delivered as intended?

• Quality• How well were the components administered?

• Exposure• How long did each component last? How many

students attended?• Responsiveness• Were participants engaged during the program?

Fidelity Checklist - GenericStudent Learning Outcomes

Program Component

Duration Features Adherence to Features

Quality

Objective X Component(s) aligned with Objective X

Length of component

List of specific features

(Y/N) recorded for each feature

Quality rating for each feature

What is rated?• The live/videotaped program

Who does the rating?• Independent auditors• Facilitators • Participants

You Must Assess.Please walk away with this:


Recommended