ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT
FOR
PROPOSED
LPG BOTTLING PLANT
AT
VILLAGE: JAKKASANDRA
TALUK: MALUR
DISTRICRT: KOLAR
STATE: KARNATAKA(Under Schedule 6(b) - Category ‘B’ as per EIA notification 2006 and its Amendments)
PROPOSED BY
SHV ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
Report Prepared by
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTHUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD
CHENNAI
MARCH 2016
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. a
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The following people are gratefully acknowledged for their fullest support in rendering
needful information regarding the project and kind cooperation in fulfilling the report
SHV ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
Mr. Cdr A S Oberoi IN –Vice President
Mr. UdayaKumar. R – General Manager (operations)
Mr. T.Radhakrishnan – Sr.Manager (Projects)
Mr. Billal Tanveer – Sr. Engineer (Projects)
Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd, Chennai
Dr. J.R.Moses – FAE
Dr. Rajkumar Samuel–FAE
Mr. Abishek Moses – Team Member
Mr. A.Manoharan– FAE
Mr. V.Dhivakar– FAE
Ms. Ramaa Prakash – FAE
Dr. G. Sundar – Team Member
Mr. A.K Natarajan – Team Member
Ms. A. Ragatharani – Team Member
Ms. Priyanka.R – Team Member
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. b
Declaration of Experts contributing to the EIA
I hereby certify that I was involved in the EIA report for the project titled “Proposed LPG
Bottling Plant” at Jakkasandra village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, Karnataka by SHV Energy
Private Limited along with the Functional Area Experts listed below during June 2015 to till
date.
EIA Coordinator:
Name:
Signature & Date:
Period of involvement:
Contact information:
Functional Area Experts:
S. No.Functional
AreasName of the Expert Duration of Involvement Signature
1. AP Dr.J R MOSESSeptember 2015-January 2016
2. WP, SHW RAMAA PRAKASHNovember 2015-January 2016
3. SHW Dr.J R MOSES January 20164. SE V DHIVAKAR
September 2015-January 20165. EB,WP
Dr.RAJKUMAR
SAMUEL
January 2016
6. EB A. MANOHARAN January-February 2016
7. AQ Dr.J R MOSES January-February 2016
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. c
8. RH Dr.J R MOSES
*See below the expansion of Functional Areas
Functional Area
CodeAbbreviation of the Functional Areas
LU Land Use
AP Air Pollution monitoring, Prevention and Control
AQ Meteorology, Air Quality Modeling & Prediction
WP Water Pollution monitoring, Prevention and Control
EB Ecology and Biodiversity
NV Noise and Vibration
SE Socio-Economics
HG Hydrology, Ground Water & Water Conservation
GEO Geology
SC Soil Conservation
RH Risk Assessment and Hazards Management
SHW Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
Declaration by the Head of the Accredited Consultant Organization
I, Dr.J.R.MOSES hereby, confirm that the above mentioned experts prepared the EIA for
“Proposed LPG Bottling Plant” at Jakkasandra village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District, Karnataka
by SHV Energy Private Limited. I also confirm that I shall be fully accountable for any mis-
leading information mentioned in this statement.
Signature:
Name:
Designation:
Name of the EIA Consultant Organization: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. d
NABET Certificate No. & Issue Date: 77, 11th August 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 20
1.1 Purpose of the report...................................................................................................................20
1.1.1 EIA Requirement ........................................................................................................................20
1.2 Project Proponent -Background ..................................................................................................21
1.3 Brief description of the Project ....................................................................................................21
1.4 Project Setting..............................................................................................................................21
1.5 Applicable Regulatory Framework ..............................................................................................21
1.6 Methodology adopted for the Study ............................................................................................27
1.7 Objectives of this EIA Report......................................................................................................27
1.8 EIA Process.................................................................................................................................27
2 PROJECT DESCIPTION .......................................................................................................... 28
2.1 About the project.........................................................................................................................28
2.2 Project Location ..........................................................................................................................28
2.3 Details of Alternative sites considered .........................................................................................34
2.4 Project Cost .................................................................................................................................34
2.5 Size or Magnitude of Operation ..................................................................................................35
2.6 Process Details.............................................................................................................................35
2.7 Resource Requirements...............................................................................................................41
2.8 Pollution Control Measures Proposed ........................................................................................45
2.9 Rain water Harvesting ..................................................................................................................46
2.10 Fire Protection Systems ...............................................................................................................46
3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................... 48
3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................48
3.2 Scope of Baseline Study ..............................................................................................................48
3.3 Micrometeorology .......................................................................................................................51
3.4 Wind Pattern of Kolar District ....................................................................................................52
3.5 Determination of Atmospheric Inversion level............................................................................54
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. e
3.6 Land Use of Kolar District ..........................................................................................................56
3.7 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring .................................................................................................57
3.8 Noise Environment .....................................................................................................................64
3.8.1 Reconnaissance Survey ................................................................................................................65
3.9 Water Environment.....................................................................................................................67
3.9.1 Surface Water Resources ............................................................................................................68
3.9.2 Ground water resources...............................................................................................................68
3.9.3 Reconnaissance............................................................................................................................68
3.9.4 Observations................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.9.4.1 Ground Water.........................................................................................................................78
3.9.4.2 Surface water ...........................................................................................................................78
3.9.5 Ground water Scenario................................................................................................................79
3.9.5.1 Hydrogeology of Kolar District................................................................................................79
3.9.5.2 Geomorphology of Kolar District ............................................................................................79
3.10 Soil Environment.........................................................................................................................81
3.10.1 Observations............................................................................................................................85
3.11 Ecological Environment...............................................................................................................85
3.12 Socio-Economic Environment.....................................................................................................86
3.12.1 District Profile: ........................................................................................................................86
3.12.2 District Social Indicators:.........................................................................................................87
3.12.3 Occupation: .............................................................................................................................87
3.12.3.1 Agriculture Profile of the District.........................................................................................88
3.12.4 Land holding pattern of the District:........................................................................................89
3.12.5 Industries: ................................................................................................................................89
3.12.6 Education: ...............................................................................................................................89
3.12.7 Health:.....................................................................................................................................89
3.12.8 Project area (10 Km Radius) ....................................................................................................90
3.12.8.1 Occupation: .........................................................................................................................93
3.12.8.2 Land Use details ..................................................................................................................93
3.12.9 Village Profile: .........................................................................................................................94
3.12.10 Interaction with locals ..............................................................................................................95
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. f
3.12.11 Conclusion:..............................................................................................................................96
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ............ 98
4.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................98
4.2 Construction Phase......................................................................................................................98
4.2.1 Activities during Construction Phase ...........................................................................................98
4.2.2 Impacts during Construction Phase .............................................................................................99
4.3 Activities during Operational Phase...........................................................................................100
4.3.1 Impacts & Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase ..........................................................100
4.4 Receptors of impact, significant impacts and mitigation measures .............................................100
4.4.1 During Construction Phase........................................................................................................100
4.4.1.1 Land Environment ................................................................................................................100
4.4.1.2 Air Environment....................................................................................................................101
4.4.1.3 Water Environment...............................................................................................................102
4.4.1.4 Noise Environment ...............................................................................................................102
4.4.1.5 Waste generation ...................................................................................................................103
4.4.1.6 Ecology ..................................................................................................................................104
4.4.1.7 Social Environment ...............................................................................................................104
4.4.2 Activities during Operation Phase .............................................................................................104
4.4.2.1 Air Environment....................................................................................................................104
4.4.2.2 Water Environment...............................................................................................................105
4.4.2.3 Noise Environment ...............................................................................................................105
4.4.2.4 Land Environment ................................................................................................................105
4.4.2.5 Socio-Economic Environment...............................................................................................105
4.4.2.6 Impact of transport of raw material and product: ..................................................................106
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES............................................................................................. 115
5.1 Selection of Site .........................................................................................................................115
5.2 Selection of Technology ............................................................................................................115
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN ......................................................................116
6.1 Environmental Management Plan during Construction Phase ...............................................116
6.2 Environmental Management Plan during Operation Phase ....................................................117
6.3 Post project Environmental monitoring ...................................................................................118
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. g
6.3.1 Environmental Monitoring Programme...................................................................................118
6.4 Greenbelt Development Plan ....................................................................................................119
6.4.1 Development of green belt will include: ..................................................................................120
6.5 Occupational Health and Safety Program ................................................................................121
6.6 Environmental safety Policy of SHV Energy Pvt. Ltd ................................................................123
6.6.1 Environment Management Cell ...............................................................................................123
6.6.2 Hierarchical system/administrative order of SHV for Environmental management..............124
6.6.3 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan ..................................................................126
6.7 Corporate Social Responsibility ................................................................................................127
6.8 Project Schedule........................................................................................................................139
7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES ..........................................................................................................140
7.1 Disaster Management Plan.......................................................................................................140
7.2 Risk Assessment.........................................................................................................................140
8 PROJECT BENEFITS ............................................................................................................... 141
9 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION ............................................................................................. 142
10 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS...................................................................................... 145
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. h
List of Tables
Table 1-1Applicable Acts and Rules for the proposed project ..................................................................23Table 2-1: Details of Total cost break-up...................................................................................................34Table 2-2: Details of proposed products and capacities ............................................................................35Table 2-3 Machineries List.........................................................................................................................40Table 2-4: Land Use pattern of the Industry ..............................................................................................41Table 2-5: Break-up of fresh water requirement ......................................................................................41Table 2-6: Details of treatment and final disposal methods of wastewater generated .............................42Table 2-7: Inlet and Outlet Quality of Effluent generated from the project .............................................43Table 2-8: Details of Power requirement and backup power supply .......................................................44Table 2-9: Details of D.G sets .....................................................................................................................45Table 2-10: Details of Domestic solid waste ..............................................................................................46Table 3-1: Monitoring of various Environmental Attributes.....................................................................49Table 3-2: Frequency and Monitoring methodologies of Environmental Parameters ..............................50Table 3-3: Climatology Data (Source: IMD Station)..................................................................................54Table 3-4: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations..............................................................................59Table 3-5:Test Methods used for the analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters...................................60Table 3-6: Average Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (September to December 2015) ..................63Table 3-7: Details of Noise monitoring Locations......................................................................................65Table 3-8Ambient Noise Quality Standards (CPCB Limits) .......................................................................66Table 3-9 Noise Monitoring Results...........................................................................................................66Table 3-10 Details of Ground Water Sampling Locations ........................................................................69Table 3-11 : Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations .......................................................................70Table 3-12 : Test Methods used for analysis of water quality parameters................................................71Table 3-13: Ground water analysis results ................................................................................................73Table 3-14: Surface water analysis results ................................................................................................76Table 3-15: Details of Soil Monitoring Locations ......................................................................................81Table 3-16: Soil Monitoring Locations.......................................................................................................83Table 3-17 Flora in the Study area.............................................................................................................85Table 3-18 Fauna in the Study area ...........................................................................................................86Table 3-19 Social Indicators.......................................................................................................................87Table 3-20 Land holding status..................................................................................................................89Table 3-21 District Health Infrastructure facilities ...................................................................................90Table 3-22 Villages around 10km radius form the project site ................................................................90Table 4-1 Summary of findings ...............................................................................................................107Table 4-2 Impact and Mitigation measures during Construction Phase ................................................113Table 4-3 Impact and Mitigation measures during Operation Phase .....................................................114Table 6-1Environmental Monitoring Programme...................................................................................119Table 6-2Hierarchical system for Environmental Management .............................................................125Table 6-3Cost Estimate for EMP ...............................................................................................................126
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. i
Table 10-1Details of the Consultant ........................................................................................................145
List of Figures
Figure 2-1Satellite Image showing the location of the project site ...........................................................29Figure 2-2 Satellite Imagery of the Site (10Km Radius) ...........................................................................30Figure 2-3 KIADB Layout showing the proposed site ................................................................................31Figure 2-4Location Plan .............................................................................................................................32Figure 2-5 Site Plan ....................................................................................................................................33Figure 2-6Site Photos..................................................................................................................................34Figure 2-7Process flow diagram of LPG storing and bottling plant ..........................................................38Figure 2-8Process flow chart for LPG storage and bottling plant .............................................................39Figure 2-9Water Balance Flow chart .........................................................................................................42Figure 2-10 Malur CET Plant Photos .........................................................................................................44Figure 3-1 Wind Rose Diagram of Kolar District (HAL old Airport-IMD Source) ...................................52Figure 3-2 Map Showing Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations in the study area (10 Km Radius)....................................................................................................................................................................59Figure 3-3AAQ Sampling Photograph .......................................................................................................64Figure 3-4: Ground Water monitoring locations ......................................................................................69Figure 3-5: Surface Water monitoring locations .......................................................................................70Figure 3-6:Hydrogeology Map of Kolar District........................................................................................80Figure 3-7 Soil monitoring locations .........................................................................................................82Figure 3-8 Soil sampling Photographs .......................................................................................................82Figure 3-8 Workers Category ....................................................................................................................88Figure 3-9 Workers status around 10 Km radius of the site .....................................................................93Figure 3-10 Land Use Pattern around 10 Km radius ................................................................................94Figure 3-11 Land Use Pattern of the Jakkasandra Village .........................................................................95Figure 3-12 Photographs of Interaction with locals..................................................................................97Figure 6-1 Green Belt Layout of the Site ..................................................................................................121
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. j
List of Annexure
Annexure –I - Terms of Reference………………………………………………………….20
Annexure –II - Land Possession Certificate………………………………………………….28
Annexure –III - KIADB Layout Plan…………………………………………………………..28
Annexure –IV - Plot Plan of SHV, Kolar………………………………………………………28
Annexure-V – Material Safety Data Sheet……………………………………………………35
Annexure –V - Rain water Harvesting System Plan…………………………………………46
Annexure –VI - Fire Hydrant system layout………………………………………………….47
Annexure –VII – Onsite Emergency Plan……………………………………………………..139
Annexure- VIII – Risk Assessment Report………………………………………………….....139
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. k
COMPLIANCE TO TERMS OF REFERENCE
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
A. Standard TOR
1 Executive Summary Enclosed
2 Introduction
i. Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET
accreditation
Please refer Chapter 10
ii. Information about the Project Proponent Please refer Chapter 1
iii. Importance and Benefits of the Project Please refer Chapter 1 & 8
3 Project Description
i. Cost of project and Time of completion Please refer Chapter 2
ii. Products with capacities for the proposed project Please refer Chapter 2
iii.If expansion project, details of existing products with
capacities and whether adequate land is available for
expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.
Not Applicable. This is a
proposed new project
iv. List of Raw materials and their source with mode of
transportation
Please refer Chapter 2
v. Other chemicals and materials required with quantities
and storage capacities
Please refer Chapter 2
vi. Details of emission, effluents, hazardous waste
generation and their management
Please refer Chapter 2
vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of
supply, status of approval, water balance diagram,
man-power requirement (regular and contract)
Please refer Chapter 2
viii. Process description along with major equipments
and machineries, process flow sheet (quantitative) from
raw material to products to be provided
Please refer Chapter 2
ix.Hazard identification and details of proposed safety
systems
Please refer Chapter 2
x. Expansion/ modernization proposals
(a) Copy of all Environmental Clearance(s) including
amendments thereto obtaining for the project from
Not Applicable
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. l
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
MoEF&CC/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure.
A certified copy of the latest monitoring report of
the Regional office of the Ministry of Environment
and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on
the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in
all existing environmental clearances including
Amendments shall be provided. In addition status of
compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing
existing operation of the project from SPCB shall be
attached with the EIA-EMP report
(b) In case the existing project has not obtained
environmental clearance, reasons for not obtaining
the provisions of the EIA notification 1994 and/or
EIA notification 2006 shall be provided. Copies of
Consent to Establish / No objection certificate and
Consent to Operate (in case of units operating in
prior to EIA notification 2006, CTE and CTO of FY
2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be
submitted. Further compliance report to the
conditions of Consents from the SPCB shall be
submitted.
4 Site Details
i. Location of the project site covering village,
Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, justification for
selecting the site. Whether other sites were
considered
Please refer Chapter 2
ii. A Topo sheet of the study area of radius of 10Km and
site location on 1:50,000/ 1:25,000 scale on an
A3/A2 sheet (including al eco-sensitive areas and
environmentally sensitive places)
Please refer Chapter 2
iii. Details w.r.t option analysis for selection of site Please refer Chapter 2
iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site Please refer Chapter 2
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. m
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
v. Google map Earth downloaded of the project site Please refer Chapter 2
vi. Layout maps including existing unit as well as
proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area,
greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an
industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial
indicating location of unit within the Industrial
area/Estate.
Please refer Chapter 2
vii. Photographs of the proposed and existing (if
applicable) plant site, existing, show photographs of
plantations/greenbelt, in particular
Please refer Chapter 2
viii. Land use break-up of total land of the project site
(indicate and acquired), government/ private-
agriculture, forest, wasteland, water bodies,
settlements, etc shall be included (not required for
industrial area)
Please refer Chapter 2
ix. A list of major industries with name and type within
the study area (10 km radius) shall be incorporated.
Land use details of the study area)
Please refer Chapter 2
x. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of
the study area shall be included.
Please refer Chapter 3
xi. Details of drainage of the project upto 5km radius of
the study area. If the site is within 1Km radius of any
major river, peak and lean season river discharge as
well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak
rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood
Level of the project site and maximum of Flood of
the river shall also be provided (mega green field
projects)
Please refer Chapter 3
xii. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not
complete, stage of the acquisition process and
expected time of complete procession of the land.
Acquisition certificate
enclosed in Annexure-II
xiii. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Not applicable. It is in
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. n
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
Government policy KIADB industrial area
5 Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable)
i. Permission and approvals for the use of forest land
(forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of
the State Forest Department (if applicable)
Not Applicable
ii. Land use map based on High resolution satellite
imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the
forest land (in case of projects involving forest land
more than 40 Ha)
Please refer Chapter 3
iii. Status of application submitted for obtaining the stage
of Forest Clearance along with latest status shall be
submitted
Not Applicable
iv. The projects to be located within 10 Km of the
National parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves,
Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project
proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated
by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-
à-vis the project location and the recommendations
or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon.
Not Applicable
v. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the
Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for
conservation of schedule of fauna, if any exists in the
study area.
Not Applicable
vi. Copy of application submitted for clearance under the
Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 to the Standing
Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.
Not Applicable
6 Environmental Status
i. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the
project site and site-specific micrometeorological date
using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind
speed and direction and rainfall
Please refer Chapter 3
ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM0, Please refer Chapter 3
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. o
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO and other parameters relevant to
the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations
shall be based on CPCB guidelines and take into
account the pre-dominant wind direction, population
zone, sensitive receptors including reserved forests.
iii.Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all
stations as per frequency given in the NAAQM
notification of Nov. 2009 along with- min-max,
average and 98% values for each of the AAQ
parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be
provided as an annexure to the EIA report
Please refer Chapter 3
iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (1000m
upstream and downstream of discharge point) and
other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/
MoEF&CC guidelines.
Please refer Chapter 3
v. Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river
identified by the CPCB/MoEF& CC, if yes give details
No
vi. Ground water monitoring at minimum 8 locations shall
be included
Please refer Chapter 3
vii. Noise level monitoring at minimum 8 locations
shall be included
Please refer Chapter 3
viii. Soil characteristics as per CPCB guidelines Please refer Chapter 3
ix.Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of
vehicles for transportation of materials, additional
traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement
etc.
Please refer Chapter 3
x. Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and
aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with
special reference to rare, endemic and endangered
species. If schedule-I fauna and found within the study
area, a Wildlife Conservation plan shall be prepared
and furnished
Please refer Chapter 3
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. p
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
xi.Socio-economic status of the study area Please refer Chapter 3
7 Impact and Environmental Management Plan
i. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants
from the stack emission based on site-specific
meteorological features. In case the project is located
on a hilly terrain, AQIP modeling shall be done using
inputs of the specific terrain characteristics for
determining the potential impacts of the project on the
AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sources of emissions
(including transportation) on the AAQ of the area
shall be assessed. Details of the model used and the
input data used for modeling shall also be provided.
The air quality contours shall be plotted on a location
map showing the location of the project site,
habitation nearby, sensitive receptors, if any.
Please refer Chapter 4
ii. Water quality modeling- in case of discharge in water
body
Not Applicable. Effluent
discharged to CETP, Malur
iii. Impact of the transport of raw material and end
products on the surrounding environment shall be
assessed and provided. In this regard, options for
transport of raw materials and finished products and
wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road
transport or conveyor-cum-rail transport shall be
examined.
Please refer Chapter 4
iv. A note on treatment of waste water from different
plant operations, extent recycled and reused for
different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme
of effluent treatment, characteristics of untreated and
treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of
discharge under E(P) rules.
Please refer Chapter 4
v. Details of stack emission and action plan for control of
emissions to meet standards.
Please refer Chapter 4
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. q
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
vi. Measures for fugitive emission control Please refer Chapter 4
vii. Details of hazardous waste generation and their
storage, utilization and management, Copies of MOU
regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in
cement plant also be included. EMP shall include the
concept of waste-minimization, recycle/
reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and
natural resource conservation.
Please refer Chapter 4.
Agreement will be made
with TSDF for safe
disposal of hazardous
wastes
viii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per
Fly Ash notification, 200. A detailed plan of action
shall be provided.
Please refer Chapter 4
ix. Acton plan for the green belt development plan in 33%
area i.e., land with not less than 1500 trees per Ha.
Giving details of Species, width of plantation, planning
schedule etc. shall be included. The green belt shall be
around the project boundary and a scheme for
greening of the roads used for the project shall also be
incorporated.
Please refer Chapter 6
x. Action plan for rain water harvesting measures at
plant site shall be submitted to harvest rainwater from
the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the
ground water and also to use for the various activities
at the project site to conserve fresh water and reuse
the water requirement from other sources.
Please refer Chapter 2
xi. Total capital cost and recurring cost /annum for
environmental pollution control measures shall be
included.
Please refer Chapter 6
xii. Action plan for Post-project environmental monitoring
shall be submitted
Please refer Chapter 6
xiii. Onsite and offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made)
preparedness and Emergency Management Plan
including Risk Assessment and damage control.
Enclosed in Annexure-VIII
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. r
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
Disaster Management Plan should be linked with
District Disaster Management Plan.
8 Occupational Health
i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational
health & safety of all contract and casual workers
Please refer Chapter 6
ii. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of
worker. If the worker’s health is being evaluated by
pre-designed format, chest x-rays, Audiometry,
Spirometry, Vision testing (Far and near vision,
colour vision and any other ocular defect), ECG,
during pre placement and periodical examinations
give the details of the same. Details regarding last
month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters
as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department
wise.
Not Applicable. This is a
proposed project
iii.Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards.
What are the exposure levels of hazards and whether
they are Permissible Exposure level (PEL) if these are
not within PEL, what measures the company has
adopted to keep them within PEL. So that health of the
workers can be preserved.
Not Applicable. This is a
proposed project
iv. Annual report of health status of workers with special
reference to Occupational Health and Safety
Not Applicable. This is a
proposed project
9 Corporate Environment Policy
i. Does the company have a well laid down
Environemntal Policy approved by its Board of
Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report
Please refer Chapter 6
ii. Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard
operating process/procedures to bring into focus any
infringement/ deviation/ violation of the environemnt
or forest norms/ conditions? If so, it may be detailed in
the EIA
Please refer Chapter 6
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. s
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
iii. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative
order of the company to deal with the environemntsl
issues and for ensuring compliance with the
environemntal clearance conditions? Details of this
system may be given.
Please refer Chapter 6
iv. Does the company have system of reporting of non-
compliances/ violations of environemntal norms to
the Board of Directors of the company and/or
Stakeholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting
mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report
Please refer Chapter 6
10 Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as
sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour
force during construction as well as to the casual workers
including truck drivers during operation phase.
Please refer Chapter 4
11 Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)
i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5% of the project cost) shall
be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social
Commitment based on public Hearing issues and item-
wise details along with the bound action plan shall be
included. Socio-Economic development activities need
to be elaborated upon.
Please refer Chapter 6
12 Any litigation pending against the project and/ or any
direction/ order passed by any Court of Law against the
project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the
unit received any notice under the section 5 of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of
Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance
/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case.
No
13 A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of
above TOR
Complied
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. t
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
B. Specific Terms of Reference for EIA studies for Isolated Storage & Handling of Hazardous
Chemicals (As per Threshold planning Quantity indicated in column 3 of Schedule 2 & 3
of MSIHC Rules 1989 Amended 2000)
1 Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored
alongwith storage quantities at the facility, their category
(as per MSIHC rules) MSDS.
Please refer Chapter 2
2 Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages
and mode of their disptch.
Please refer Chapter 2
3 Layout plan of the storage tanks and other associated
facilities
Please refer Chapter 2
4 Details on types and specifications of the storage facilities
including tanks, pumps, piping, valves, flanges, pumps,
monitoring equipments, systems for emissions control,
safety controls including relief systems.
Please refer Chapter 2.
Also refer Annexure VIII
5 Arrangement to control loss/leakage of chemicals and
management system in case of leakage
Please refer Chapter 2.
Also refer Annexure VIII
6 Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan
- Identification of hazards
- Consequence Analysis
- Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and
respective preventive measures including distance
between storage units in an isolated storage facility
- Onsite and offsite emergency preparedness plan
Please refer Annexure VIII
Additional TORs
1 Solvents and other painting materials used in the system,
impact on the storage by this activity
Please refer Chapter 4.
2 Inlet and oulet water quality of ETP, reason for providing
solar pond has to be explained
Please refer Chapter 2.
3 Explore the possibility to use CNG in place of Diesel
Generator sets
Availability of CNG run
Diesel Generation sets of
our requirement (250
KVA) needs to be explored
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. u
S.No Terms of Reference Compliance
for availability & viability.
Till such time,
conventional DG sets will
be run, that too during
state power failures only
4 Cumulative impact on the surroundings in case of fire in
worst cased scenario and Disaster Management Plan
Please refer Annexure VII
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 IntroductionSHV operates in India under the brand name SUPER Gas. The company has installed and
operating import terminals at Tuticorin (2.5 Lakhs MTPA) and Porbandar (2.0 Lakhs MTPA)
and operating 12 own filling plants and 7 contract filling plants. The imported bulk LPG is
stored in terminal and transported to cylinder filling plants through road tankers. The
proponent has 19 Filling stations across India with a total capacity of 1.87 Lakhs MTPA
SHV Energy proposes it new plant at Jakkasandra village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. The
proposed unit is LPG bottling plant of 21000 MTPA. LPG will be coming to the unit by road in
trucks. This will be stored in bullets and filled in cylinders of various capacities. LPG is also
sold as bulk LPG to Industrial units and to be used as fuel for Auto LPG segment. The proposal
is only storage and bottling of LPG.
2 Project Description
Location of the project
The site for the proposed project is situated at plot No. 184/185, Jakkasandra Industrial area,
KasabaHobli, Malur Taluk, Kolar district, Karnataka state. The total land area of the project
site is 23507.00 Sq.M. The nearest human settlement from the site is Jakkasandra village
located at a distance of 0.9 Km in the south-west direction. The site is located approximately 6
Km from the Bangalore-Chennai National Higway-4. The nearest railway station is Malur
railway station at a distance of 10.55 Km in the south direction. There are no National Parks,
Sanctuaries and ecologically sensitive areas within the impact area of 10 Km.
Project Cost
The total investment on the project is 22 Crores and the detail of cost break up is given below.
S.No. Components Cost (in Crores)
1) Land and Land development 10.52) Buildings and Factory premises design engineering
and statutory approval5.5
3) Plant, Machinery and equipment 6Total 22
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 2
Process Details
The proposed facility will function mainly as LPG receipt, storage and bottling unit for filling
into cylinders. The plant operations are categorized as,
1) Receipt of Product
2) Storage of Product
3) Dispatch
Land Requirement
The total area occupied by SHV Energy Private Limited for LPG storage facility is 23,506.84
Sqm. Green belt of 33.2 % is proposed.
Water Requirement
The total fresh water requisite for the proposed plant is 10 KLD, which is sourced through
KIADB water supply.
Waste water generation and disposal
Sewage/effluentgenerated from
Treatment unitsprovided
Final disposal point
Domestic Septic tank Soak pit
Cylinder washing Sedimentationtanks
Overflow from sedimentation tank will bechannelized towards green belt development
Paint Booth -- Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP),Malur
Power requirement
The Total power requirement for the installation is 322 KVA which will be provided by
BESCOM. D.G. sets of capacity 320 KVA (2 nos) + 62.5 KVA (1 no) will serve as the backup
facilities of power supply in case of emergencies during power failure.
Man Power requirement
The total manpower required will be 14 persons on direct basis and 50 persons on indirect
basis.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 3
Rain water Harvesting
Keeping in consideration the depleting water table, rain water harvesting system has been
implemented for the proposed facility in order to utilize the under-ground water system
sustainably.
Rain water harvesting tanks are engineered and strategically located to recharge and maintain
the underground water table. Recharge pits (locations) have been set up at the site to harvest
run-off water.
Fire Protection Systems
As per OISD, following are the fire protection systems facilitated at the proposed LPG bottling
installation
Fire detection and alarm system covering the entire proposed plant area.
Portable fire extinguishers
Automatic fire water pumping system consisting of one main pump, one standby
pump and one jockey pump
External hydrant and water monitoring systems covering the entire proposed
plant area for manual fire fighting
Medium velocity water spray system for cylinder filling shed, filled storage shed,
tank truck gantry (two bays), LPG pump/ compressor shed, above ground
mounded bullet tunnel, dome, manholes, loading/unloading shed, painting
booth cum cold repair shed and connecting platforms
Personnel Health and safety equipments
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 4
3 Description of Environment
A comprehensive study on the present status of various environmental components viz., air,
water, noise, soil, hydro geological, land use patterns, ecological, socio-economical, climate
and atmospheric conditions has been conducted prior to implementation of the proposed
project.
Micrometeorology (IMD Data-Table 3.3)
Temperature - The hottest months during the year are March to May, the coolest month is
December for which the max and min temp are shown in the Table 3.3. Data was recorded as
monthly means of maximum and minimum values at 08:30 hrs and17:30hrs by IMD.
Relative Humidity - Relative humidity is a measure of the level of moisture present in the
atmosphere in relation to its saturation value at particular temperature. Data recorded as
monthly means in percentage recorded at 08:30 hrs and 17:30 hrs. Relative Humidity data
collected from IMD is shown in the Table 3.3. It is about 79% during the period between June
and November.
Wind Speed &Wind Direction- Data recorded as monthly means of maximum and minimum
values recorded at 08:30hrs and 17:30 hrs and the winds are generally moderate. In the
southwest monsoon months the winds blow from southwest or westerly direction and the reset
of the year it is mainly from northeast and southeast
Rainfall -Peak season of rainfall in Malur is during September – October. Annual average
rainfall is 760 mm and the region receives rainfall both during the southwest monsoon from
June to September and again from October to November.
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
A preliminary survey was conducted at 8 AAQM locations (within the radius of 10 Kms) that
were chosen based on the well-designed ambient air quality stations network.An intensive
monitoring was carried out as per CPCB guidelines (twice a week sampling and 24 hour
continuous sampling) to generate the baseline monitoring status of air environment within the
study area during the period of October to December 2015. The ambient air quality has been
monitored for all the 12 parameters as per NAAQS notified on 16th September, 2009.
The baseline levels of Particulate matter (PM2.5), Particulate matter (PM10), Sulfur dioxide
(SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO (µg/m3), Pb (µg/m3), O3, NH3, Benzene, Benzo (a) pyrene,
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 5
As and Ni at 8 locations of monitoring were found within the permissible limits during the
monitoring period from September to December 2015.
Noise Environment
The current status of noise environment within 10 km radius of the project site was assessed
through identification of major noise sources, monitoring of baseline noise levels in the study
area and measurement of resultant noise levels due to existing vehicular movement on major
roads, according to existing land use pattern.
The field observations during the study period indicated that the ambient noise levels in the
study area were well within the prescribed standards at all the different noise zones prescribed
by CPCB.
Water Environment
The existing water resources, both surface and ground water with the corresponding
significance are identified within the study area around proposed Project of SHV. The
representative sampling locations for surface water and groundwater are selected through
reconnaissance of project area to assess the existing (pre-project) status of water quality in the
study area. Physico-chemical, nutrient, Oxygen demand, bacteriological and biological
parameters having relevance to public health and aesthetic significance are selected to assess
the water quality status with special attention to raw water resources and the receiving body of
the treated effluent discharge from proposed project.
Ground water
The analysis of ground water results indicate that the average pH ranges in between 7.2-7.9,
TDS ranges from 118-1030 mg/l, Total hardness ranges from 50-530 mg/l, Iron content
ranges from 0.14-0.29 mg/l, nitrate content ranges from 0.2-32.3 mg/l.
Surface water
The analysis of ground water results indicate that the average pH ranges in between 6.9-7.3,
TDS ranges from 80-326 mg/l, Total hardness ranges from 23-125 mg/l, and DO ranges from
4.5-6.2 mg/l.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 6
Soil Environment
The present study of the soil quality was carried out at eight sampling locations to establish the
baseline characteristics of the study area and to determine the impact of the proposed project
on the soil characteristics.
Observations
It is observed that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 7.25-8.52 indicating
that the soils are alkaline in nature
Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from to 36-248 μS/cm. As the EC value
is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature
The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 31-44 (%).
Nitrogen as N value varies from 0.06-0.23 %
Potassium content ranges from 0.15-0.31%
Phosphorous from 0.05-0.18%
Ecological Environment
The study involved collection of primary data by carrying out survey in the 10 Km study area
and also from the secondary data of the particular area. No rare or endangered species were
observed. There are no national Parks/ Wild life Sanctuaries within 10 Km radius. The detailed
description of the biological environment is given in chapter 3.
Socio-Economic Environment
Kolar district is located in the southern region of the State and is the eastern-most district of the
Karnataka State. The district is bounded by the Bangalore Rural district in the west
Chikballapur district in the north, Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh in the east and on the
south by Krishnagiri and Vellore district of Tamil Nadu. The total area is 3979 sq. km.
Kolar district has one sub division and five taluks. Kolar sub - division comprises of Kolar,
Bangarpet, Malur, Srinivaspura&Mulbagal. The project area is mainly rural in nature with few
urban areas like Malur etc. The area’s main occupation is agriculture. The main crops are Ragi,
horticulture crops. As there is no perennial river, people undertake non-irrigated agriculture.
The family size of the area is 4.44. The area constitutes 22.21% of Scheduled Caste population
and 6.61 % of Scheduled tribe population. Nearly 80% of people are main workers as they
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 7
have works more than 6 months a year. There are 41% of workers involved in agriculture and
allied activities.
The village Jakkasandra comes under Abbenahalli village Panchayat of Malur taluk of Kolar
district. The area of the village is 370.89 Ha. As per 2011 Census, the number of households
in the village was 95, the population of the village was 469 which consist of 252 (53.73%)
male and 217(46.26%) female. The size of the family is 4.94.
Though the major part of the land is being used as agricultural land (278.94 Ha), majority of
workers are employed in non-agriculture activities. It is due to the industrialization in nearby
areas and proximity to Malur town and Bangalore City. As per 2011 Census data, only 15% of
workers are in agriculture and related activities.
The main source of irrigation is tube wells. Ragi and horticultural crops are the main crops of
the area. There is no forest land in the village.
4 Anticipated environmental impacts and mitigation measures
Environmental Impact is any change in the environmental attributes, adverse or beneficial,
caused or induced by the proposed action or set of actions. The predicted adverse impacts
during each stage of project development are superimposed over the baseline status of the
existing environmental quality to infer the scenario of environmental conditions in the post-
project stage. The main purpose of identifying the impacts is that it helps in adopting
appropriate mitigation measures for the adverse consequences if any.
During Construction Phase
Land Environment
Impacts- The activities carried out during the establishment of this industry will involve a
change in the land use from an open industrial land to a built up industrial land, which will
pose the following impacts on the land environment.
Compaction of soil and a change in the soil structure due to the use of heavy
construction vehicles and machinery
Removal of soil from the site
Mixing of the topsoil and subsoil
Dispersion of dust
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 8
Mitigation measures
Employing techniques such as restricting access during wet conditions, using
protective boarding and low ground pressure machinery to minimize
compaction of soil
The removed soil will be properly stored for subsequent reinstatement
Reuse of excess excavated material for road development, green belt
development and landscaping
A well designed closed depository for storage of construction materials to
prevent land/soil pollution
Effective stabilization of altered landforms to minimize soil erosion and the
potential for water pollution (e.g. Vegetation)
Reuse of construction wastes such as sand, brick, gravel, cement for developing
internal road and project structures.
Air Environment
Impacts- The below mentioned activities might lead to a decline in the local air quality due to
generation of dust.
Site Preparation-fencing, boundary and clearing of site
Excavation, backfilling, leveling,
Hauling and dumping of earth materials and construction spoils,
Foundation works
Fabrication, erection of steel structures such as tanks, pipelines and sheds,
Construction of internal roads, drains and water supply
Cleaning and landscaping
Mitigation measures
Barricading the construction area and minimizing exposed areas to reduce dust
generation
Areas generating dust during dry weather will be sprayed with water
Conserving the existing vegetation screens to act as a barrier to dust
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 9
Appropriate enclosed areas for storage of construction materials
Facilitating the workers with the required personal protective equipments
Efficient usage and maintenance of equipments/machineries to lower air
emissions, noise pollution and consumption of energy resource
Exhaust vent of DG set will be provided with adequate stack height to ensure
quick dispersal of gaseous emissions
Periodic monitoring and maintenance of transport vehicles to check on the
quality of emission to be within permissible limits and consumption of fuel
Regular inspection of construction site to ensure timely removal and disposal of
construction debris to the dumping sites or for recycle/reuse.
Water Environment
Impacts
Contamination of watercourses by leakage from fuel and materials storage areas
Oil and suspended solids in run-off from vehicles and access roads
Use of heavy machinery and vehicles causes compaction of topsoil due to which
a change in the surface water drainage patters may occur
Mitigation measures
The water demand during the construction phase will be met from the private
water suppliers
Impenetrable lining will be provided to storage premises to avoid accidental
mixing or fugitive losses.
Storehouse will be located at a distance away from the water storage area to
prevent accidental release or spillage
Proper management of rain water run-off during monsoon and creating bunds
to utilize the rain water for construction purpose
An appropriate water management system will be implemented.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 10
Noise Environment
Impacts -The major sources of noise generation at the construction site are pneumatic
hammers, compressors, concrete mixers, operating machinery, horns and acoustic signals,
communication among workers.
Noise nuisance causes discomfort and health related issues in those who work at the site and
those who reside in the neighbouring villages
Mitigation measures
Barricading the construction site
The existing green belt will help in reducing the noise nuisance
Selection of equipments of high quality
Proper planning and organizing of construction activities which will help in
avoiding loud verbal exchanges between the intervening parties
Transportation activities will be carried out only during the day and only in case
of emergency, the transportation activities will be permitted in night time
The vehicles used for construction activities and transportation of materials will
be provided with the horn of low noise level as recommended by RTO/
concerned authorities
Minimization of operation time of noisy equipment and operation of
machineries/equipment that generate high levels of noise only during day time
Inadequate use of plant and equipment, namely, running on full power when
the work does not necessitate it will be avoided
Personal protective equipments, education and public awareness and exposure
control through rotation of work will be provided to the workers engaged in
construction activities in the area generating high levels of noise.
Waste generation
Impacts-Improper disposal of waste such as construction debris-bricks, steel scrap, wooden
scrap, sand, gravel etc generated at the construction site.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 11
Mitigation measures
Prior to commencement of construction works, assessment of materials
required, location and planning of available space for its storage will be
conducted
Quality control will be implemented to reject defective materials at the time of
delivery thus avoiding later disposal
Stockpiles of sand, gravel, soil will be situated in such a manner that they do not
spill or get washed onto the adjacent roads
Materials that come in will be labeled and the date of receiving will be recorded
Preparation of a proper waste management system which includes identification
of wastes, collection, segregation, storage and disposal methods
Recycling and reuse of certain construction debris
Spent oils and other lubricants from equipment will be collected in enclosed
containers before disposing it to approved recyclers
Ecology
The proposed facility is being established in the notified industrial area, hence no impacts have
been expected to arise on the biological environment. Except for the removal of weeds, the
ecological status of the site is well maintained by conserving the existing green belt at the site.
Social Environment
The impacts of construction activities is beneficial on the social environment as it contributes
to the economic and social development by providing employment to about 70 workers during
the construction phase and thereby raising the standard of living and quality of life. Procuring
of construction materials locally leads to increase in trading opportunities.
During Operation Phase:
Air Environment - LPG will be transported through trucks from Tuticorin port via roadways to
the bottling plant. No emissions occur during the operations as the entire bottling process is
carried out through pipelines from storage area to filling shed. The only point source of
emission is D.G sets which are fitted with stacks of adequate height to disperse the pollutants.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 12
Water Environment - Total water requirement for the plant is 10 KLD which is sourced
through KIADB water supply. Hence there will be no effect on ground water or surface water
during the operation phase of this project. There will be no process/trade effluent generated
during operations.
Mitigation measures
The site will have well developed storm water layout and rain water harvesting
pits to maximize groundwater discharge
Domestic sewage generated will be treated through septic tank followed by soak
pits.
Wastewater generated from cylinder washings and test bath unit will be
primarily dirty water with suspended solids, which will be subjected to
sedimentation unit. The treated water will be reused for cylinder washings.
Waste water generated from the paint booth will be treated in effluent treatment
plant prior to its discharge.
Noise Environment -The only source of noise within the bottling plant is during the operation
of D.G set. The noise level is maintained within the permissible limits by placing the D.G sets
within acoustic enclosures and utilizing 33 % of the total plot area for green belt development.
Land Environment - As the storage terminal will be located within the notified Jakkasandra
Industrial area, the proposed activity does not change the land use classification of the site.
Mitigation measures
Designated solid waste storage area will be allocated within the site.
Agreement will be made with TSDF for safe disposal of hazardous wastes
Socio-Economic Environment- It creates employment for about 14 persons on direct basis and
50 persons on indirect basis.
Impact due to transport of raw material and product:
Transport of Product - Bulk LPG will be transported from Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu through 18
MT road tankers. It will pass through NH 7 National Highway via Madurai, Salem, Hosur,
Malur and Jakkasandra Industrial Estate. The tankers are engaged through our dedicated
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 13
transporters with whom we have entered into comprehensive agreement who employ trained
& driving License certified drivers. Tankers are checked by Terminal staff through well-
established check list before loading at Tuticorin and unloading at bottling plant. All the
tankers are fitted with Vehicle Tracking System which will monitor and control night driving,
over speeding etc. Regular periodical training is given to our drivers to handle normal
operations as well as emergency situations.
Finished Goods- The filled cylinders will be transported through 3/4/6/10 MT commercial
vehicles which are designed to carry LPG cylinders. These vehicles are engaged through
dedicated transporters with whom we have entered into comprehensive agreement and drivers
are well trained to handle cylinders even during emergency.
5 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Environmental Management Plan during Construction Phase
Environmental impacts during the construction phase can be attributed to the site preparation
activity and the mobilization of workforce. The impacts of the construction phase on the
environment would be basically of transient nature and are expected to wear out gradually on
completion of the construction program. However, once the construction of the project is
completed and its operations started, these operation stage impacts would overlap the impacts
due to the construction activities.
In order to mitigate such impacts and restrict them within tolerable levels, the following
measures shall be adopted:
Proper and prior planning of approach and access roads, and appropriate
sequencing and scheduling of all major construction activities.
Adoption of appropriate soil conservation program and its timely
implementation in the proposed project site.
Initiation of an appropriate landscape program including plantation of trees and
flowering plants in and around the project site particularly, at all available
spaces which would serve the dual purpose of controlling fugitive dust and
abatement of noise levels in addition to improving the aesthetics of the area.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 14
Water sprinkling in the vulnerable areas to suppress the dust generated during
excavation, leveling and other operations.
Use of properly tuned construction machinery & vehicles in good working
condition with low noise & emission and engines turned off when not in use.
Control of quality of construction wastewater within the construction site
through suitable drainage system with traps for arresting the sediment load for
its proposed disposal into the main natural drainage system around the site.
Implementation of suitable disposal methods of sediment/ construction debris at
designated places to avoid water logging at construction site.
Provision of protective gears such as ear mufflers etc. for construction personnel
exposed to high noise levels and locating the temporary labor sheds for housing
the construction laborers away from the construction site.
Environmental Management Plan during Operation Phase
The following mitigation measures shall be adopted during the operation phase of the project
so as to minimize the impact:
The control measures that will be undertaken during the operation phase to mitigate the
impacts that may be caused during the operation of the project are as follows:
Periodic monitoring of the environmental attributes to check the adequacy and effectiveness of
the pollution control measures employed
The only point source of emission is D.G sets which will be fitted with stacks of
adequate height to disperse the pollutants. Non-point sources will be the bullet
trucks and vendor trucks. Adequate green belt has been developed to mitigate
the pollution arising due to movement of vehicles. Regular monitoring of DG-
Stack and Ambient air quality will be carried out.
Appropriate treatment of liquid effluents generated at the site-Domestic
wastewater will be treated in septic tanks and soak pits. The waste water from
cylinder washings and test bath unit is treated in sedimentation tanks and the
waste water generated from the paint booth is subjected to Common Effluent
treatment plant for treatment.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 15
Noise pollution will be curbed by using proper acoustic enclosures for D.G sets,
thereby the ambient noise levels will be maintained below the CPCB limits of 75
dB for industrial areas. Personal protective equipments will be provided to those
workers who work in areas of high noise.
Rainwater harvesting system has been designed to utilize the underground
water system sustainably.
Proper maintenance of greenbelt will be ensured.
Adequate safety measures conforming to the occupational health and safety
policy will be taken to prevent accidents/hazards to the workers.
Appropriate fire fighting systems will be installed at the site.
Greenbelt Development Plan
The green belt has been recommended within an area of 7804.27Sq.m (33.2%) as one of the
major components of the EMP which will further enhance the environmental quality through:
Mitigation of air pollution problems
Attenuation of noise level
Maintaining the Bio-diversity of the area by improving aesthetics.
Environment Management Cell
For the effective implementation of the mitigation measures and consistent functioning of the
proposed project, an Environmental Management System has been proposed. The EMS will
include the following:
Environmental Management Cell
Environmental Monitoring Program
Personnel Training
Regular Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plan
Documentation-Standard Operating procedures of Environmental Management
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 16
Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan
It is estimated that the total capital cost for implementing the environmental management plan
is Rs.6, 00,000, while the recurring costs for the same will be Rs. 3, 80,000.
6 Occupational Health and Safety Program
M/s SHV Energy Private t Ltd. aims at fostering a safe and healthy work environment to its
employees.
The main objectives will be
Maintenance and promotion of workers’ health and working capacity
Improvement of working environment by making it conducive to safety and
health
Development of work culture in a direction which will support health and
safety at work and thereby promoting positive social climate for smooth
operation that will enhance productivity
During Construction Phase
The activities undertaken during the pre-operation phase may pose occupational safety and
health issues. Hence the following measures will be employed:
Personal Protective equipments will be provided to the workers
Hospital facility shall be facilitated to address the emergencies that may arise
Personnel will be trained about fire fighting systems and first aid
Regular monitoring of occupational health
During Operation Phase
Conduct routine workplace inspections
Provide Personal Protective Equipment
Develop and implement safe work procedures and rules
Provide on-going safety training
Enforce safety rules and appropriate discipline
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 17
Promote safety awareness and reduce the potential for injury/loss
Identifying workplace hazards
Enforcement of safety rules
Measuring safety performance
Reducing frequency/severity of injuries
7 Risk Assessment and Disaster Management Plan
Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment for storage of LPG for the following scenarios were studied
Identification of Hazards and credible accidental events.
Consequence modeling
Vapor cloud explosion modeling
Jet Fire and Flash Fire analysis
Damage limits identification and quantification of the risk and contour mapping
on the layouts.
Disaster Management Plan
Following safety systems will be installed
Above ground, Mounded LPG storage bullets
Automatically operated Fire Protection system with 4 hours storage of water for
firefighting system.
Smart Hoses with tri-bolt breakaway coupling for tanker Unloading.
Medium velocity sprinkler system
Gas Leak and Fire Detection Systems in various areas
8 Project Benefits
This project in a true and large way will complement the domestic and commercial in terms
of storage & handling of raw materials, finished products and fuel requirements.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 18
LPG is a lower-carbon fuel with more than 2000 applications. It is cleaner than
other fossil fuels, highly energy efficient, good value and available everywhere.
LPG is safe and actively helps contribute to mitigation of climate change. It
contributes to the development of a sustainable energy model that can help us meet
our environmental objectives as a society.
LPG is usually the fuel of choice for domestic, commercial, industrial and
automotive use. With ever increasing emphasis on product quality and fuel
efficiency, LPG is fast becoming the No.1 energy choice of industrial customers.
LPG being safe, environment friendly, convenient, accessible and portable it is
being used in various sectors like Engineering & Fabrication, Aerosol Industry,
Hotels & restaurants, Ceramic Industry, Glass Industry, Agriculture Industry, Textile
Industry, Paper Industry, Plastic Industry and Chemical Industry.
Improves the quality of life by overcoming the health implications arising due to
the use biomass fuel like wood, dung and crop residues.
This project will boost the port and terminal activities.
Warehousing investment will give an opportunity for storage and various
international logistics activity to offer more competitive range of products.
This project will bridge the LPG demand and supply gap in Kolar District and
adjoining districts like Tumkur, Mangalore, Bellary, Mysore etc.
Project will generate employment for both skilled and non-skilled manpower.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 19
EIA REPORT CHAPTERS
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 20
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of the report
The Environmental Impact Assessment report is prepared for proposed LPG Bottling unit by
SHV Energy Pvt. Ltd. at Jakkasandra Industrial Area, Jakkasandra Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar
District.
In Karnataka, domestic, commercial and industrial requirements cylinders are filled in a
contract filling plant in outskirts of Bangalore and distributed to customers. Bangalore is a
growing market and the proponent planned to install an own bottling plant for enhanced
safety, better service to customers and higher level of control and efficiency.
1.1.1 EIA Requirement
The Government of India, Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC),
New Delhi, vide notification no. S. O. 1533 dated 14th September, 2006, and its amendments,
has made it mandatory to obtain Prior Environmental Clearance for New projects listed in the
schedule, expansion and modernization of existing projects listed in the schedule, any change
in product mix in the existing manufacturing unit falling within the schedule to that
notification from MoEF&CC (for Category A projects) or from SEIAA (for Category B projects).
The proposed project falls under the schedule 6 (b) as per the EIA notification dated September
14, 2006 and its amendments. Since the project is located within Industrial Area, the project
falls under the Category B. There are no interlinked projects.
The application along with project documents was submitted to SEIAA, Karnataka. Based on the
information furnished and the presentation done before the SEAC members during 145th SEAC
meeting on 17thand 18thAugust, 2015, the Terms of reference for the EIA study was issued on
10/9/ 2015. The Terms of Reference (ToR) copy is enclosed in Annexure-I.
With a view to evaluate likely impacts/ risks associated with the proposed projects on various
component of the environment and propose appropriate management and monitoring plan,
SHV Energy Pvt. Ltd. took services of Hubert Enviro Care System Pvt. Ltd.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 21
1.2 Project Proponent -Background
SHV Energy is a Dutch Multi National having LPG trading activity in India since 1996.In 1993,
the Government of India opened up the LPG sector to private players with a plan involving
phased removal of subsidies on domestic LPG usage. As the need began to grow in both
domestic and non-domestic use of LPG, SHV Netherlands saw opportunity to enter the LPG
market in India. Thus SHV India was born in 1995. LPG business was set up from the
Greenfield stage by constructing LPG import terminals, and operations started in West Region
(Ahmadabad) and South Region (Hyderabad). During 1996-98, several filling plants were set
up and franchisee distribution network was extended. Infrastructure was developed to expand
and grow the business in various parts of the Country.
SHV operates in India under the brand name SUPER Gas. The company has installed and
operates import terminals at Tuticorin (2.5 Lakhs MTPA) and Porbandar (2.0 Lakhs MTPA)
and operates 12 own filling plants and 7 contract filling plants. The imported bulk LPG is
stored in terminal and transported to cylinder filling plants through road tankers. The
proponent has 19 Filling stations across India with a total capacity of 1.87 Lakhs MTPA
1.3 Brief description of the Project
SHV Energy proposes it new plant at Jakkasandra village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. The
proposed unit is LPG bottling plant of 21000 MTPA. LPG will be coming to the unit by road in
trucks. This will be stored in bullets and filled in cylinders of various capacities. LPG is also
sold as bulk LPG to Industrial units and to be used as fuel for Auto LPG segment. The proposal
is only storage and bottling of LPG.
1.4 Project Setting
The project site is located at notified Jakkasandra Industrial Area proposed by KIADB. The site
is well connected by road to NH 4 (Bangalore – Tripathi). Volvo Unit is located within 6.5 Km
from site and Honda is 1.5 Km from site.
1.5 Applicable Regulatory Framework
The following are applicable Acts and Rules related to the proposed project:
I. EIA Notification 2006 and its amendments
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 22
II. Manufacture Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules,1989and its
amendments
III. Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,1974and its amendments
IV. Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act,1981and its amendments
V. Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary
movement)Rules,2008 and its amendments
VI. Public Liability InsuranceAct,1991 and its amendments
VII. Environmental (Protection)Rules,1986 and its amendments
VIII. The Noise Pollution (Regulation and control) rules, 2000
IX. Factories Rules 1950 and its amendments
X. Petroleum Act, 1934
XI. Explosive Act,1884
XII. Central Motor Vehicle Act, 1988
The details of Acts and Rules with applicability to the proposed project are given in
Table 1-1.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 23
Table 1-1Applicable Acts and Rules for the proposed project
S.No Act and Rules applicable Purpose Objective Applicability
1. EIA Notification 2006 and
its amendments.
New projects, Expansion
modernization, change of
product mix of the existing
project
Protection and
Improvement of the
Environment
As the proposal is for new
project scheduled under
category 6b, Environmental
Clearance from Ministry of
Environment & Forest is
applicable
2. The Manufacture, Storage
and Import of Hazardous
Chemicals Rules, 1989
and its amendments
Handling of Hazardous
Chemicals
Regulate the manufacture,
storage and import of
Hazardous Chemicals
Preparation/ update of On-
site Emergency Preparedness
Plan and submission to
Factory inspectorate.
Preparation/ update of Safety
Report and submit to Factory
inspectorate.
Preparation of Material
Safety Data Sheet.
3. The Water (Prevention
and Control of Pollution)
Act, 1974 and its
amendments.
New projects, Expansion
modernization, change of
product mix of the existing
project,
Existing plants
Prevention, control and
abatement of water
pollution
Consent to Establish and
Consent to Operate from
State Pollution Control Board
to be obtained for new
product
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 24
S.No Act and Rules applicable Purpose Objective Applicability
4. The Air (Prevention and
Control of Pollution) Act,
1981 and its
amendments.
New projects, Expansion
/modernization, change of
product mix of the existing
project, Existing industries
Prevention, control and
abatement of air pollution
Consent to Establish and
Consent to Operate from
State Pollution Control Board
to be obtained for new
product
5. The Hazardous waste
(Management, Handling
and Transboundary
Movement Rules) 2008
and its amendments.
Management, Handling
and Transboundary
Movement of Hazardous
waste
Prevention, Control and
abatement of pollution
Hazardous waste
Authorization from State
Pollution Control Board to be
obtained
6. The Public Liability
Insurance Act, 1991 and
its amendments
Transportation of
Hazardous Substance.
To provide immediate
relief to persons affected
by accident involving
hazardous substances and
also for Establishing an
Environmental Relief fund
Provision of Liability
Insurance Policy.
7. The Environmental
(Protection)Rules,1986
and its Amendments
New projects,
Expansion/modernization
change of product mix of
the existing project,
Existing industries
Protection and
Improvement of the
Environment
Environmental Standards as
specified are to be complied.
Submission of Environment
Statement on yearly basis to
KSPCB
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 25
S.No Act and Rules applicable Purpose Objective Applicability
8. The Noise Pollution
(Regulation And Control)
Rules, 2000
New projects,
Expansion/modernization
change of product mix of
the existing project,
Existing industries
To protect the workers
and public from noise
related problems
Noise control measure.
Comply with Noise standards
and submission of monthly
report to KSPCB
9. Factories Rules 1950 and
its amendments.
New projects,
Expansion/modernization
change of product mix of
the existing project,
Existing industries
Control of workplace
environment, and
providing for good health
and safety of workers
Factory License from Factory
inspectorate for new project
10. The Petroleum Act, 1934 New projects,
Expansion/modernization
change of product mix of
the existing project,
Existing industries
Production, Storage and
import of petroleum and
provides the regulations
for the safety and
environmental measures
License acquired for storage
and adequate safety
measures for petroleum
products
11. The Explosive Act, 1884 New projects,
Expansion/modernization
change of product mix of
the existing project,
Existing industries
Production, Storage and
import of explosive
substance in and around
the project and provides
the regulations for the
safety and environmental
measures
Safety measures are complied
for the storage of petroleum
products in the plant as per
PESO guidelines.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 26
S.No Act and Rules applicable Purpose Objective Applicability
12. The Central Motor
Vehicle Act, 1988
New projects,
Expansion/modernization
change of product mix of
the existing project,
Existing industries
Check the pollution load
of vehicles inside the plant
Adequate environmental
measures are put in place to
check the vehicular
emissions.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 27
1.6 Methodology adopted for the Study
An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is an assessment of the possible impact, whether
positive or negative, that a proposed project may have on the environment, together consisting
of the natural, social and economic aspects, i.e., aiming at “Sustainable Development” due to
the project activities.
1.7 Objectives of this EIA Report
To ensure environmental considerations are explicitly addressed and
incorporated into the development decision-making process.
To anticipate and avoid, minimize or offset the adverse significant biophysical,
social and other relevant effects of the above project proposal.
To protect the productivity and capacity of natural systems and the ecological
processes which maintain their respective functions
To promote development that is sustainable and optimize resource use as well as
management opportunities.
To fully recognize the scope and requirements of the TOR and comply with the
same.
1.8 EIA Process
The EIA process followed for this EIA report is composed of the following stages:
Study of project information
Screening & Scoping
Environmental pre-feasibility study & application for approval of ToR
Collection of detailed project management plan/report
Baseline data collection
Impact identification, Prediction & Evaluation
Mitigation measures & delineation of EMP
Risk assessment and safety & disaster management plan
Review & finalization of EIA Report based on the ToR requirements.
Submission of EIA report for implementation of mitigation measures & EMP as
well as necessary clearances from relevant Authority.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 28
2 PROJECT DESCIPTION
2.1 About the project
M/s SHV Energy Private Limited proposes to set up a LPG bottling plant with a storage capacity
of 21000 MTPA, in the KIADB Industrial area at Jakkasandra village. The plant will primarily
serve as LPG receipt, storage and bottling unit for filling into cylinders. The present proposal is
a LPG storage facility and this activity is listed under the schedule 6 (b) “Storage of Isolated and
hazardous chemicals”, Category-‘B’ as per the EIA notification dated September 14, 2006 and
its amendments.
2.2 Project Location
The site for the proposed project is situated at plot No. 184/185, Jakkasandra Industrial Area,
Kasaba Hobli, Malur Taluk, Kolar district, Karnataka state. The total land area of the project
site is 23507.00 Sq.m. The nearest human settlement from the site is Jakkasandra village
located at a distance of 0.9 Km in the south-west direction. The site is located approximately 6
Km from the Bangalore-Chennai National Higway-4. The nearest railway station is Malur
railway station at a distance of 10.55 Km in the south direction. There are no National Parks,
Sanctuaries and ecologically sensitive areas within the impact area of 10 Km.
The land Possession certificate issued by Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
(KIADB) to M/s SHV Energy Pvt Ltd., and layout map of Jakkasandra Industrial Area of KIADB
is enclosed as Annexure-II and Annexure-III. The plot plan of M/s SHV Energy Pvt Ltd. is
attached as Annexure-IV. The coordinates of the four corners of the site are given below.
S.NO. LATITUDE LONGITUDE1) 13ᵒ04’ 05.5’’ N 77ᵒ 57’49’’ E2) 13ᵒ 05’ 03.6’’ N 77ᵒ57’ 45.6’’ E
3) 13ᵒ 05’ 02.7’’ N 77ᵒ 57’ 52.7’’ E4) 13ᵒ05’ 06.6’’ N 77ᵒ 57’ 49.4’’ E
The satellite image showing the project site and the map indicating the location of the project
site are represented in Figure 2.1. The Google map covering 10 Km radius around the project
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 29
area is given in Figure 2.2. This indicates the site is barren land and within 10 Km radius, there
are no ecologically sensitive locations.
Figure 2-1Satellite Image showing the location of the project site
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 30
Figure 2-2 Satellite Imagery of the Site (10Km Radius)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 31
Figure 2-3 KIADB Layout showing the proposed site
SHV Site
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 32
Figure 2-4Location Plan
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 33
Figure 2-5 Site Plan
FireWaterTanks
TankTruck
Gantry
LPGMoundedStorageBullets
Sedimentationpit/ ETP
TruckParking
Cylinderloading Area
EmergencyGateMain
Gate
AdminBuilding
LPG FillingShed
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 34
Figure 2-6Site Photos
2.3 Details of Alternative sites considered
The present proposed site for the project falls in the well established KIADB notified
Jakkasandra Industrial Area and the premises has all the adequate infrastructure facilities
necessary. The site is well connected to the roadways which makes the transportation of the
materials easy. Therefore no alternate sites have been considered.
2.4 Project Cost
The total investment on the project is 22 Crores and the detail of cost break up is given inTable.2.1
Table 2-1: Details of Total cost break-up
S.No. Components Cost (in Crores)
1) Land and Land development 10.52) Buildings and Factory premises design engineering
and statutory approval5.5
3) Plant, Machinery and equipment 6Total 22
18mt Road
SHV Site SHV Site
SHV SiteVacant Site
SHV Site
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 35
2.5 Size or Magnitude of Operation
The proposed project is only storage and a filling facility for LPG. Hence there is no production,
operation or manufacturing of products. The details of proposed products and capacities are
given in Table 2.2. The Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) is enclosed as Annexure-V.
Table 2-2: Details of proposed products and capacities
S.No. Proposed Capacity Quantity (Nos./month) Capacity (MTPA)
1 12 Kg 700 100.82 17 Kg 24000 48963 33 Kg 12000 47524 Bulk Supply 200 MT/M through
tankers2400
Total capacity 12148.8Total Capacity proposed 21000
Note- LPG of Capacity 12148.8 MTPA is for single shift operation. The Total proposed
capacity of 21000 MTPA will be accomplished in two shifts.
2.6 Process Details
The proposed facility will function mainly as LPG receipt, storage and bottling unit for filling
into cylinders. The plant operations are categorized as,
1) Receipt of Product
2) Storage of Product
3) Dispatch
Process Description
a) Bulk unloading system:
The proposed installation will receive LPG via road tankers, from which it is unloaded and
stored in mounded bullets of 75 MT capacity each. The total storage capacity from both the
mounded bullets configuration will be 150 MT, among which one bullet of 75 MT capacity
will serve for the future requirements. The bulk unloading process will be designed for the
capacity of 72 MT per shift.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 36
The unloading process will begin by connecting road tanker liquid line to the respective
receiving bullet. The liquid LPG flow will continue till the pressure in road tanker and
receiving bullet equalizes with each other. At this stage the LPG compressor will be started,
with its suction line connected to bullet and the discharge line connected to road tanker vapor
line. The vapor pressure difference in bullet and road tanker drives the LPG liquid from road
tanker to bullet. The liquid LPG unloading further continues until the complete road tanker is
unloaded. The pressurized LPG vapor left in the road tanker will be recovered with the help of
same compressor by changing the compressor suction from mounded bullet to road tanker
through 4 way valves. The recovered vapor will be stored in respective bullets. LPG compressor
will be interlocked for low pressure trip with the road tanker, so that the compressor will be
tripped after recovering optimal amount of vapor.
b) Bottle filling system
i) Filling of cylinders of capacity- 12, 17 and 33 Kg:
The filling station will have the capacity of 60 MT per shift. In the filling station the empty
cylinders (12, 17 & 33 Kg) will be fed to the automated chain conveyor system. The conveyor
system will be routed through the following units for completing the filling process:
Empty cylinder weight scale with CVT
Cylinder washing unit
Electronic filling machines (10 Nos.)
Online electronic cylinder weight scale unit
Digital compact valve tester unit(DCVT)
In line Test bath
Hot air sealing unit
Cylinders go through the online electronic check scale unit and if incase they are rejected, and
then it will be directed to the manual weight correction unit where the weight correction will
be done manually and then it will be routed to the automated conveyor for subsequent process.
If any filled cylinder fails in the DCVT and in line test bath unit then the defected cylinders will
be directed to evacuation rack for evacuation and repairing work. The evacuated LPG from
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 37
rejected cylinders will be collected in an evacuation vessel and then stored in storage bullets.
The emptied cylinder will be purged using the purging unit.
The liquid LPG will be supplied to the filling heads through LPG vane pumps. The LPG pumps
suction and discharge lines will be designed with all safety requirements. The filled LPG
cylinders will be conveyed and stored in the filled cylinder storage shed.
ii) Cylinders of capacity 450 Kg
The 450 Kg empty cylinder will be brought to the filling point and taken back to the loading
bay with the help of manual tray. The 450 Kg cylinders shall be filled in the 2 nos. dedicated
electronic filling machines. All filling station equipment shall be designed as per OISD 169
guidelines.
c) Bulk Loading System
The liquid LPG will be loaded to road tankers from storage bullets by LPG pumps at a rate of
144 MT per shift. The loading process will be done simultaneously to LPG bottling. Therefore,
standby LPG pumps will also be operated during road tanker loading and bottling process.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 38
Figure 2-7Process flow diagram of LPG storing and bottling plant
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 39
Figure 2-8Process flow chart for LPG storage and bottling plant
Receives LPG through roadtankers
LPG unloading from tankers
Storage of LPG in moundedbullets (2 x 75 MT Capacity)
Filling of LPG in Cylinders infilling sheds (4.5, 12, 17, 33and 450 Kg)
Final Post Quality Check(Weight check, valve leakcheck)
Dispatch of cylinders toauthorized vendors
Empty Cylinderunloading
Checked for damages(valve leaks)
OK cylinderssent to Filling
Carousel
Valves refittedfor leakycylinders
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 40
Table 2-3 Machineries List
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 41
2.7 Resource Requirements
a) Land Requirement
The total area occupied by SHV Energy Private Limited for LPG storage facility is 23,506.84
Sqm. It maintains adequate green belt area. The land use pattern of the industry is as given in
Table 2.4.
Table 2-4: Land Use pattern of the Industry
S.No. Component Area in Sq.m Area in %
1) Built up area 3450.68 14.68
2) Vacant 7405.00 31.50
3) Green Belt 7804.27 33.200
4) Road and Pavements 4846.89 20.62
Total 23506.84 100
b) Water Requirement
The total fresh water requisite for the proposed plant is 10 KLD, which is sourced through
KIADB water supply. The break-up of the consumption of water is as presented in the Table
2.5.
Table 2-5: Break-up of fresh water requirement
S.No. Description Consumption(KLD)
1) Domestic 1
2) Paint Booth 3
3) Fire Fighting 3
4) Process - IndustrialRequirement cleaning
3
Total 10
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 42
Figure 2-9Water Balance Flow chart
Wastewater Treatment and Disposal details
The treatment methods and the final disposal of each type of wastewater generated are
appended in the Table 2.6. The inlet and outlet of effluent generated from the project is given
in Table 2.7.
Table 2-6: Details of treatment and final disposal methods of wastewater generated
Sewage/effluentgenerated from
Treatment unitsprovided
Final disposal point
Domestic Septic tank Soak pitCylinderwashing
Sedimentationtanks
Overflow from sedimentation tank will bechannelized towards green belt development
Paint Booth -- Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP),Malur
Total water demand10 KLD
Domestic1000 L/D
Process (Cylindercleaning and testing)
3000 L/D
Dry Paint BoothWashing(cylinder
washing andpaint booth)
3000 L/D
CETP3000L/D
Sedimentationpit
Septic tankwith soak pit
Gardening
Fire systemmake up
3000 L/D
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 43
Table 2-7: Inlet and Outlet Quality of Effluent generated from the project
Parameters DescriptionEffluentSource
Paint Booth
Quality of RawSewage in Mg/l
COD ≤ 3800 SS ≤ 600 O&G ≤ 100 pH - 4 to 9
Treated Waterstandardachieved by theprocess in Mg/l
COD ≤ 250 SS ≤ 30 O&G ≤ 10 pH - 7.5 to 8
Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP), Malur
Common Effluent Treatment Plant is set up by C E T PLANT MALUR (P) LTD at Plot No. 64& 65
KIADB Industrial area, Malur, Kolar District. The coordinates of the location are 130 09 ́ North
Latitude and 780 11 ́ East Longitude. This facility is authorized by KSPCB in operation since 4
years. Its authorization is valid up to 30th June 2018.
The Existing Capacity of this plant is 140 KLD. Treatment Scheme Involves: Primary, Secondary
and Tertiary Technology:
1. Based on Sequencing Batch Reactor
2. Multiple effect evaporation to treat high TDS effluent
Characteristics of Effluent Treatment method adopted Capacity
Biodegradable waste water Activated Sludge process
(SBR Technology)
60 KL/day
Effluents containing highTDS.
Multiple Effect Evaporation System. 80 KL/day
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 44
General Characteristics of Effluents received
Stream A (Biodegradable) Stream B( High TDS)
BOD:2000mg/lit BOD:2000mg/lit
COD:5000mg/lit COD:6000mg/lit
Oil and Grease:25mg/lit Oil and Grease: 20mg/lit
TDS:>1000 TDS:>6000mg/lit
Figure 2-10 Malur CET Plant Photos
Malur CETP Plant - Site Photo voltaic Solar System
c) Power requirement
The Total power requirement for the installation is 322 KVA which will be provided by
BESCOM. D.G. sets of capacity 320 KVA (2nos) + 62.5 KVA (1 no) will serve as the backup
facilities of power supply in case of emergencies during power failure. The details of power
required and backup power supply are presented in Table 2.8.
Table 2-8: Details of Power requirement and backup power supply
Particulars Proposed Capacity(KVA)
Source
Power Requirement 322 BESCOM
Power Backup 320 KVA ( 2 nos) + 62.5 KVA (1 no) D.G. Sets
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 45
Availability of CNG run DG sets of our requirement (250 KVA) needs to be explored for
availability & viability. Till such time, conventional DG sets will be run, that too during state
power failures only.
d) Man Power requirement
The total manpower required will be 14 persons on direct basis and 50 persons on indirect
basis.
2.8 Pollution Control Measures Proposed
a) Air Pollution
During the operations, no emissions are generated as the entire bottling process is carried out
through pipelines from storage area to filling shed. The only major point sources of emissions
from this industry are D.G sets. These sources will be fitted with stacks of adequate height so as
to disperse the emanating flue gases containing particulate matter, oxides of sulfur and
nitrogen without affecting the ground level concentrations of the surrounding environment.
The sources of air pollution are given in the Table 2.9.
Table 2-9: Details of D.G sets
D.G Set Capacity (Standby) Nos320 KVA 2 Nos62.5 KVA 1 No
b) Noise Pollution
The primary source of noise pollution in the plant is the D.G. set, which are provided with
proper integral acoustic enclosures. The proposed green belt along the periphery and at
various locations within the industry premises and also the inbuilt design of mechanical
equipment and building ensures the maintenance of ambient noise levels to be within the
ambient standards.
c) Solid waste
There will be no generation of industrial solid wastes during the bottling process. Damaged
cylinders will be segregated and stored on site prior to disposal as scrap metal. The quantity of
domestic solid waste generated from the proposed industry during the operation phase is
detailed in the table 2.10.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 46
Table 2-10: Details of Domestic solid waste
Total No. of employees 64Assuming per capita solid waste generation rate as 0.20 kg/capita/dayQuantity of solid waste generated 12.8 Kg/dayOrganic Solid waste: 40% of the total waste 5.12 Kg/dayInorganic Solid waste: 60 % of the total waste 7.68 Kg/day
d) Waste water generation
Domestic sewage will be disposed through septic tanks and soak pits. Waste water generated
from cylinder washings will be diverted to sedimentation traps and the clarified water will be
reused for green belt development. Spent wash from the caustic wash, dissolved VOC, paint
booth wash will be treated in effluent treatment plant before discharge.
2.9 Rain water Harvesting
Keeping in consideration the depleting water table, rain water harvesting system has been
implemented for the proposed facility in order to utilize the under-ground water system
sustainably.
Rain water harvesting tanks are engineered and strategically located to recharge and maintain
the underground water table. Recharge pits (locations) have been set up at the site to harvest
run-off water.
The rain water harvesting system plan is enclosed as Annexure-VI.
2.10 Fire Protection Systems
As per OISD, following are the fire protection systems facilitated at the proposed LPG bottling
installation
Fire detection and alarm system covering the entire proposed plant area.
Portable fire extinguishers
Automatic fire water pumping system consisting of one main pump, one standby pump
and one jockey pump
External hydrant and water monitoring systems covering the entire proposed plant area
for manual fire fighting
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 47
Medium velocity water spray system for cylinder filling shed, filled storage shed, tank
truck gantry (two bays), LPG pump/ compressor shed, above ground mounded bullet
tunnel, dome, manholes, loading/unloading shed, painting booth cum cold repair shed
and connecting platforms
Personnel Health and safety equipments
a) Design basis for pumps
Spray density of 10LPM/m2 is considered as per OISD: 169 clause 4.4.2.
Highest Water Requirement for water spray system is 4000 LPM for cylinder filling
shed.
As per OISD: 169 clause 4.4.2. (iii), the fire water system in the plant shall be designed
to meet the highest fire water flow requirement of a single largest risk of any cases at a
time plus 72 Cu. M per hour for operating 2 hydrant points
72 Cu. M per hour = 1200 LPM.
Total Water required = 4000 + 1200 = 5200 LPM (312 m3/hr).
The next available pump is 6834 LPM (410 m3/hr)
b) Design basis for fire water tanks
As per KIADB, 4hrs of fire fighting to be done
Required size of fire water Tank = 4 x 410 = 1640 KL.
Two circular steel fire water tanks each having effective capacity of 820 KL
The fire hydrant layout is attached as Annexure-VII.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 48
3 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
3.1 Introduction
A comprehensive study on the present status of various environmental components viz., air,
water, noise, soil, hydro geological, land use patterns, ecological, socio-economical, climate
and atmospheric conditions has been conducted prior to implementation of the proposed
project. The primary baseline data has been collected from environmental monitoring surveys
carried out from 4th week of September to 4th week of December during the Post-monsoon
season at the 8 selected locations. The understanding towards the prevailing environmental
conditions in the surrounding study area will aid in assessing the possible significant impacts
on the existing environment near the vicinity of the project location and thereby helps in
adopting suitable mitigation measures for the protection and the sustainability of the
environment on account of any change deviation in the environment due to the proposed
anthropogenic activity.
3.2 Scope of Baseline Study
An area, encompassing a 10 Km radial distance from the project site is considered as the study
area for the purpose of the baseline studies. The environmental quality status of the study area
prior to initiation of the project will serve as the baseline for anticipating and superimposing
the possible impacts due to the proposed project and to derive the post-project status of the
environment in the project region.
The various environmental attributes monitored for compiling the environmental baseline data
is presented in the Table 3.1.The frequency and monitoring methodology employed for the
various environmental attributes is given in Table 3.2.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 49
Table 3-1: Monitoring of various Environmental Attributes
S.No. Attribute Parameter Source of Data
1.Climatology and
Meteorology
Wind speed, wind direction, relative
humidity, rainfall and temperature
Indian Meteorological
Department and site specific
information
2. Water Quality Physical and chemical Parameters
Monitored data
Ground water-8 locations
Surface water-8 locations
3.Ambient Air
Quality
PM10, PM2.5, NOx, SO2, NH3, O3, CO,
Pb, Benzene, Benzo (a) pyrene, Arsenic
and Nickel
Monitored samples at 8
locations Within 10 Km
radius
4. Noise levels Noise levels in dBMonitored samples at 8
locations
5. EcologyExisting terrestrial flora and fauna
within the study area
Primary Field survey within
10 Km from the project site
and Secondary sources
6. Geology Geological characteristics Secondary sources
7. Soil Physical and chemical Analysis of 8 soil samples
8.Socio-economic
aspectsSocio-economic characteristics
Based on Field Survey and
data collected from secondary
sources
9. Land useLand use change for different
categories
Within 10 Km radius of the
project site-Secondary sources
(Toposheet/satellite imagery)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 50
Table 3-2: Frequency and Monitoring methodologies of Environmental Parameters
Attributes Sampling Measurement methodNetwork Frequency
MeteorologyWind speed, Winddirection, Relativehumidity, Rainfall,
Temperature
Project site,Surrounding area
3 monthsWeather monitor
with data base
Air EnvironmentParticulate matter
(PM10)
Selected locations inthe project study area
24 hourly-twice aweek for three
Months in non-monsoon season
As per CPCBstandards under 18th
November 2009Notification for
National Ambient AirQuality Standards
(NAAQS)
Particulate matter(PM2.5)
Oxides of Sulfur(SO2)
Oxides of Nitrogen(NOx)
Total Volatile organiccompounds
HydrocarbonsBenzene
Benzo (a) PyreneLead
Arsenic (As)Nickel (Ni)
Ammonia (NH3)Ozone (O3)
Carbon monoxideWater Environment
Parameters for waterquality: pH, temp,
turbidity, Totalhardness, total
alkalinity, chloride,sulphate, nitrate,fluoride, sodium,
potassium, ElectricalConductivity,
Ammonical nitrogen,Nitrate-Nitrogen total
phosphorus, BOD,COD, Calcium,
Set of grab samples Atrequisite locations forground and surface
water
Once
Samples for waterquality collected andanalyzed as per IS :
2488 (Part 1-5)methods for sampling
and testing ofIndustrial effluents
Standard methods forexamination of water
and wastewateranalysis published by
American Public
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 51
Magnesium, TotalDissolved Solids, Total
Suspended Solids
Health Association.
Soil EnvironmentParameter for soil
quality: pH, texture,electrical
conductivity, organicmatter, nitrogen,
phosphate, sodium,calcium, potassium
and Magnesium.
Requisite soil samplesbe collected as per BISspecification within
project influence area
Once
Biological Environment
Terrestrial andAquatic Flora and
Fauna
Requisite locations inthe project influence
areaOnce
Noise Environment
Noise levels
Requisite locations inthe project influence
areaOnce
Instrument: Noiselevel meter
3.3 Micrometeorology
The micro-meteorological conditions in study area during air quality study period are of
importance to understand the variations in ambient air quality status in study region. The
prevailing micrometeorology at project site plays a crucial role in transport and dispersion of
air pollutants released from the plant. The principal variables are horizontal transport and
dispersion (average wind speed and directions), convective transport and vertical mixing
(atmospheric stability) and also topography of the area as local influences.
For determining the prevailing micro-meteorological conditions during the study period, an
automatic continuous digital weather station was installed at project site. The location is
chosen such that there is no obstruction to the flow of wind and sunlight. The hourly
meteorological data of wind speed, wind direction, temperature and solar radiation were
recorded at the project site. These frequencies were computed on 8 hourly as well as 24 hourly
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 52
basis and the corresponding results are used to draw wind rose for 00-08hrs, 08-16 hrs, 16-
24 hrs and 00-24hrs corresponding to study period as shown in subsequent sections.
3.4 Wind Pattern of Kolar District
Figure 3-1 Wind Rose Diagram of Kolar District (HAL old Airport-IMD Source)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 53
Secondary Data (IMD Source)
Wind speed direction recorded at 8.30 hrs and 17: 30 hours has been analyzed for 16 wind
direction via, N,NNE,NE,ENE,E,ESE,SE,SSE,SSW, SW, WSW, W,WNW, NW,NNW and these are
presented as wind roses.
Temperature
The hottest months during the year are March to May, the coolest month is December for
which the max and min temp are shown in the data collected from IMD. Data recorded as
monthly means of maximum and minimum values recorded at 08:30 hrs and17:30hrs
Relative Humidity
Relative humidity is a measure of the level of moisture present in the atmosphere in relation to
its saturation value at particular temperature. Data recorded as monthly means in percentage
recorded at 08:30 hrs and 17:30 hrs. It is about 79% during the period between June and
November.
Wind Speed &Wind Direction
Data recorded as monthly means of maximum and minimum values recorded at 08:30hrs and
17:30 hrs and the winds are generally moderate. In the southwest monsoon months the winds
blow from southwest or westerly direction and the reset of the year it is mainly from northeast
and southeast
Rainfall
Peak season of rainfall in Malur is during September – October. Annual average rainfall is 760
mm and the region receives rainfall both during the southwest monsoon from June to
September and again from October to November.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 54
Table 3-3: Climatology Data (Source: IMD Station)
3.5 Determination of Atmospheric Inversion level
*Source: Surendra Roy, Piyush Gupta, Trilok Nath Singh., 2012, Studies on Meteorological Parameters and
Mixing Height in Gold Mining Area, Resources and Environment, 2(5): 228-239.
In meteorology, an inversion is a deviation from the normal change of an atmospheric
property with altitude. It almost always refers to a "temperature inversion", i.e. an increase in
temperature with height, or to the layer ("inversion layer") within which such an increase
occurs.*
Inversions occur during the winter months when normal atmospheric conditions (cool air
above, warm air below) become inverted. Inversions trap a dense layer of cold air under a
layer of warm air. The warm layer acts much like a lid, trapping pollutants in the cold air near
the valley floor.*
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 55
Temperature inversion is the condition in which the temperature of the atmosphere increases
with altitude in contrast to the normal decrease with altitude. When temperature inversion
occurs, cold air underlies warmer air at higher altitudes.*
During a temperature inversion, air pollution released into the atmosphere's lowest layer is
trapped there and can be removed only by strong horizontal winds. Because high-pressure
systems often combine temperature inversion conditions and low wind speeds, their long
residency over an industrial area usually results in.*
Atmospheric condition where a layer of cold air nearer to the ground gets trapped under a
layer of warm air. The air pollutants (which would normally have dispersed over a wide area)
remain locally confined due to inversion. In cold countries, morning school openings are often
delayed to protect school children from this concentration of polluted air.*
Mixing Height*
Mixing height is defined as the height of the layer adjacent to the ground over which
pollutants enter into this layer get mixed up by convection or mechanical turbulence within
one hour or it is the height above the surface up to which emitted air pollutants are diluted.
Atmospheric Stability*
Atmospheric stability is one of the essential parameters for air quality studies. Among Pasquill
stability classes, the presence of class A indicates strong mixing whereas E or F gives rise to
poor dispersion. The stability classes can be determined based on mixing heights and sodar
echograms.
Influence of Meteorological Parameters on Mixing Height*
Meteorological parameters such as wind speed, wind direction, surface temperature, humidity,
solar radiation and rainfall can affect the mixing height.
Atmospheric Inversion level in Kolar Gold mine area*
The mixing height was the highest between 12:00 IST and 14:00 IST in all the seasons
indicating the highest volume of air will be available for the dispersion of pollutants during
this period. Stability classes A, B, C, E and F were predominant at different times of the day in
the seasons. These classes can be used to find out the dispersion coefficients required for the
computation of emission rates of pollutants. The predominant wind direction as indicated by
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 56
windrose diagrams for different seasons can be used to minimise the impacts of air pollution
by planting fast growing trees perpendicular to the plume moving towards habitations.*
3.6 Land Use of Kolar DistrictLULC Information (2011-12) for KolarTotal Geographical Area: 8223 Sq. Km
(Source: NRSC, ISRO)
LULC Class Area(Sq.Km) LULC Class Area
(Sq.Km)Builtup,Urban 64.6 Builtup,Rural 118.68Builtup,Mining 130.48 Agriculture,Crop land 4623.66Agriculture,Plantation 903.26 Agriculture,Fallow 449.63Forest,Deciduous 364.79 Forest,Forest Plantation 208.9
Forest,Scrub Forest 180.11Barren/unculturable/Wastelands, Salt Affectedland
2.48
Barren/unculturable/ Wastelands,Gullied/Ravinous Land 23.16 Barren/unculturable/
Wastelands, Scrub land 547.48
Barren/unculturable/ Wastelands,Barren rocky 138.21 Wetlands/Water Bodies,
River/Stream/canals 20
Wetlands/Water Bodies,Reservoir/Lakes/Ponds 447.54
Total 8223.00
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 57
3.7 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
The major objective of baseline air monitoring is to evaluate the existing air quality of the area.
Formulation of baseline Ambient Air Quality (AAQ) data of the study area occupies a
significant role in the Environmental Impact Assessment studies in assessing the conformity to
standards of the ambient air quality during the construction and operation of the proposed
project.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 58
Reconnaissance
The predominant monsoon winds persisting in India dictates the transport and dispersion of
air pollutants during different seasons. As per the climatological conditions prevailing in India,
the seasons accounted for carrying out air pollution studies are winter, summer and post-
monsoon seasons.
A preliminary survey was conducted at 8 AAQM locations (within the radius of 10 Kms) that
were chosen based on the well-designed ambient air quality stations network. The baseline
status of air environment has been assessed through ambient air quality monitoring (AAQM)
network covering 8 sampling locations considered based on the following criteria:
Micrometeorological conditions-Persistence of wind direction and speed,
atmospheric stability
Predominant upwind and downwind directions
Identification of regional background
Location of industries, their emission magnitude and topography of the study area.
Determination of sensitive receptors such as hospitals, schools, thickly populated
residential localities.
Consideration of all the major conventional air pollution parameters as per latest
NAAQS(National Ambient Air Quality Standards)
An intensive monitoring was carried out as per CPCB guidelines (twice a week sampling and
24 hour continuous sampling) to generate the baseline monitoring status of air environment
within the study area during the period of September to December 2015.
The ambient air quality has been monitored for all the 12 parameters as per NAAQS notified
on 16th September, 2009. The major air pollutants monitored on 24 hourly basis are,
Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5 µg/m3), Sulfur dioxide and oxides of Nitrogen. Sampling
and analysis of the above variables are according to the guidelines of Central Pollution Control
Board. The details of sampling locations selected for ambient air quality monitoring and their
distances and directions from the plant site are presented in Table 3.4 and Figure 3.2.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 59
Figure 3-2 Map Showing Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations in the study area (10 KmRadius)
Table 3-4: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Locations
S.No. Sampling
Stations
Samples Geographical
Coordinates
Direction
with
respect to
site
Approx.
Aerial
distance
from the
site in
(Km)
Environmental
Setting
1 Project site AAQ1 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 04’ 59.4’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 57’ 49.1’’’
--- --- Industrial Area
2 Byranhalli AAQ2 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 17.7’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 55’ 59.6’’
NW 5.4 Residential and
Rural Area
3 Doddashivara AAQ3 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 02’ 06.8’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 59’ 06.3’’
SE 6.2 Residential and
Rural Area
4 Vokkaleri AAQ4 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 04’ 14.3’’
Long.-E 078ᵒ 02’ 25.2’
SE 8.16 Residential and
Rural Area
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 60
S.No. Sampling
Stations
Samples Geographical
Coordinates
Direction
with
respect to
site
Approx.
Aerial
distance
from the
site in
(Km)
Environmental
Setting
5 Narsapura AAQ5 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 08’ 09.2’’
Long.-E 078ᵒ 00’ 56.7’’
NE 6.73 Industrial Area
6 Chikkanahalli AAQ6 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 07’ 31.7’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 54’ 15.2’’
SE 9.8 Residential and
Rural Area
7 Malur AAQ7 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 00’ 57.1’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 07.7’’
SW 9.5 Residential Area
8 Malur
(Adarshnagar)
AAQ8 Lat.- N 13ᵒ 00’ 04.3’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 22.4’’
SW 9.8 Residential Area
Baseline Status
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and their test methods are given in Table 3.5.
Table 3-5:Test Methods used for the analysis of Ambient Air Quality Parameters
S.No. Pollutants Analytical method NAAQ Standards: 2009
Time Weighted
Average
Concentration in Ambient
air-Industrial, Residential,
Rural and Other Areas
1 Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2), μg/m3
IS:5182(Part-
2):2001
(Reaff:2006)
Annual
24 Hours
50
80
2 Nitrogen
Dioxide
(NO2), μg/m3
IS: 5182 (Part - 6):
2006
Annual
24 Hours
40
80
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 61
S.No. Pollutants Analytical method NAAQ Standards: 2009
Time Weighted
Average
Concentration in Ambient
air-Industrial, Residential,
Rural and Other Areas
3 Particulate
Matter
(PM2.5),
μg/m3
IS: 5182 (Part -
23): 2006
Annual
24 Hours
40
100
4 Particulate
Matter
(PM10),
μg/m3
HECS/AIR/
Ambient/SOP011
Annual
24 Hours
60
60
5 CO μg/m3 IS:5182(Part–
10):1999
(Reaff:2006)
8 Hours
1 Hour
2
4
6 Pbμg/m3 IS:5182(Part–
22):2004
(Reaff:2006)
Annual
24 Hours
0.5
1.0
7 O3, μg/m3 HECS/AIR/Ambie
nt/SOP013
8 Hours
1 Hour
100
180
8 NH3, μg/m3 HECS/AIR/
Ambient/SOP012
Annual
24 Hours
100
400
9 Benzene,
μg/m3
IS:5182(Part–
11):1999
(RA:2009)
Annual 5
10 Benzo (a)
pyrene,
ng/m3
IS:5182(Part–
12):2004(RA:200
9)
Annual 1
11 Arsenic, ng/
m3
HECS/AIR/
Ambient/SOP014
Annual 6
12 Nickel, ng/
m3
HECS/AIR/
Ambient/SOP007
Annual 20
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 62
G.S.No.826 (E) dated 16th November, 2009. Vide letter no. F. No. Q-15017/43/2007-CPW
*Annual Arithmetic mean of minimum 104 measurements in a year at a particular site taken twicein a week 24 hourly at uniform interval.
**24 hourly/8/1 hourly monitored values as applicable, shall be complied with 98 percent of thetime in a year.2% of time they may be exceeded the limits but not on two consecutive days ofmonitoring.
Results and Observations
The existing baseline levels of Particulate matter (PM2.5), Particulate matter (PM10), Sulfur
dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO (µg/m3), Pb (µg/m3), O3, NH3, Benzene, Benzo (a)
pyrene, As and Ni at 8 locations of monitoring were found to be within the permissible limits
during the monitoring period from September to December and are presented in Table 3.6.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling UnitIntroduction
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 63
Table 3-6: Average Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data (September to December 2015)
S.NoSamplingLocations
Parameters
SO2
µg/m3NO2
µg/m3PM10µg/m3
PM2.5µg/m3
COμg/m3
Pbμg/m3
O3μg/m3
NH3μg/m3
Benzeneμg/m3
Benzo(a)
pyreneng/m3
Asng/m3
Ning/m3
1) AAQ1 15.60 28.29 51.48 27.46BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
2) AAQ2 11.70 26.52 56.48 23.05BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
3) AAQ3 14.63 22.99 58.32 26.34BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
4) AAQ4 11.70 24.76 50.93 21.23BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
5) AAQ5 13.65 25.29 55.38 25.38BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
6) AAQ6 16.53 20.18 60.38 20.13BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
7) AAQ7 12.68 23.87 49.27 18.43BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
8) AAQ8 15.60 24.76 53.15 25.99BDL(DL
0.005)
BDL(DL
0.05)
BDL(DL 10)
BDL(DL 5)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 1)
BDL(DL 5)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 64
Figure 3-3AAQ Sampling Photograph
3.8 Noise Environment
The noise generated due to operation of individual process units at an industrial project site
cause significant impacts on the surrounding environment including nearby human habitats.
Such operations fall in the category of continuous point sources of noise generation. There are
also some secondary noise sources associated with almost all types of large scale industrial
projects, which are mainly vehicles used for transportation of materials as well as employees
and material handling equipment at the project site. However, such sources could be
categorized as intermittent/continuous noise sources depending on frequency/intensity.
The prevailing ambient noise level at a particular location is nothing but the resultant (total) of
all kinds of noise sources existing at various distances around that location. The ambient noise
level at a location varies continuously depending on the type of surrounding activities. The
ambient noise levels generally does not reflect any seasonal variation, however, the weather
conditions of wind direction, rain, snow, fog etc., physical conditions like barrier or any other
natural ground variations (Topography) as well as direction of source play significant role in
regulating the noise propagation and ultimately the intensity of its impact.
The current status of noise environment within 5 km radius of the project site was assessed
through identification of major noise sources, monitoring of baseline noise levels in the study
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 65
area and measurement of resultant noise levels due to existing vehicular movement on major
roads, according to existing land use pattern.
3.8.1 Reconnaissance Survey
A reconnaissance survey was conducted with a view to establish the baseline status of the
environment with respect to noise levels in the study area. The Project site is in KIADB area.
The prime objective of noise monitoring is to establish the existing ambient noise levels during
the day as well as night time in residential, industrial, commercial and silence zones in the
study area around proposed site. The terrain of project site as well as in the surrounding
impact zone is highly undulated with hilly terrain and the area is under the influence of noise
generated by heavy traffic on highways as well as from commercial activities in the individual
villages. The prevailing ambient noise levels were monitored in and around 10Km distance in
8 locations during September to December 2015 as represented in below Table 3-7 & 3-8
using precision noise level meter.
Table 3-7: Details of Noise monitoring Locations
Location
Code
Sampling
Stations
Geographical
Coordinates
Direction
with respect
to project
site
Approx
Aerial
Distance
with respect
to project
site in Km
Environmental
Setting
N1 Project Site Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 17.3’’
Long.-E 77ᵒ 55’ 59.2’’ --- ---
Industrial Area
N2 Gangapura
(Nearby to
NH75)
Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 20.1’’
Long.-E 77ᵒ 52’ 41.4’’
SE 9.8 Residential and
rural Area
N3 Byranhalli Lat.- N 13ᵒ 01’ 39.7’’
Long.-E 77ᵒ 59’ 20.7’’
SW 5.4 Residential and
rural Area
N4 Mylapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 05’ 04.0’’
Long.-E 78ᵒ 03’ 09.7’’
NW 9.5 Residential and
rural Area
N5 Doddashivara Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 50.6’’
Long.-E 78ᵒ 02’ 43.7’’
SE 6 Residential and
rural Area
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 66
Location
Code
Sampling
Stations
Geographical
Coordinates
Direction
with respect
to project
site
Approx
Aerial
Distance
with respect
to project
site in Km
Environmental
Setting
N6 Vokkaleri Lat.- N 13ᵒ 08’ 09.2’’
Long.-E 78ᵒ 00’ 56.7’’
SE 8.16 Residential and
rural Area
N7 Arabikothanur Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 50.6’’
Long.-E 78ᵒ 02’ 43.7’’
NE 8.2 Residential and
rural Area
N8 Narsapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 08’ 09.2’’
Long.-E 78ᵒ 00’ 56.7’’
NE 6.73 Industrial Area
Table 3-8Ambient Noise Quality Standards (CPCB Limits)
Category of Area/ Zone Limits in dB (A) Leq
Day Time Night Time
Industrial Area 75 70
Commercial Area 65 55
Residential Area 55 45
Silence Zone 50 40
Table 3-9 Noise Monitoring Results
LocationCode Sampling Stations Environmental Setting
Noise Level[dB (A)]
Day Night
N1 Project Site Industrial Area 70 65
N2
Gangapura(Nearby to
NH75)Residential and ruralArea 53.4 44.8
N3 Byranhalli Residential and ruralArea 54.7 44.9
N4 Mylapura Residential and rural 52.6 44.1
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 67
LocationCode Sampling Stations Environmental Setting
Noise Level[dB (A)]
Day NightArea
N5 Doddashivara Residential and ruralArea 54.5 43.7
N6 Vokkaleri Residential and ruralArea 53.9 44.5
N7 Arabikothanur Residential and ruralArea 54 43.6
N8 Narsapura Industrial Area 74 69.8
The field observations during the study period indicated that the ambient noise levels in the
study area were well within the prescribed standards at all the different noise zones prescribed
by CPCB.
3.9 Water Environment
The impacts on water environment are inherent part of any major developmental projects in
two ways: one is stress on water resources (continuous withdrawal of large quantities of water)
and the other is pollution impacts through discharge of effluents. These impacts may be on
either or both surface and groundwater resources in the project area depending on the specific
situation. To address these issues it is necessary to take a stock of available water resources in
project area with respect to their existing quality as well as their supportive capacity to
represent the baseline status of water environment.
The existing water resources, both surface and ground water with the corresponding
significance are identified within the study area around proposed Project of SHV. The
representative sampling locations for surface water and groundwater are selected through
reconnaissance of project area to assess the existing (pre-project) status of water quality in the
study area. Physico-chemical, nutrient, Oxygen demand, bacteriological and biological
parameters having relevance to public health and aesthetic significance are selected to assess
the water quality status with special attention to raw water resources and the receiving body of
the treated effluent discharge from proposed project. The standard methods prescribed for
surface, groundwater and coastal marine water sampling as well as the analytical procedures
for individual parameters is followed in this study.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 68
3.9.1 Surface Water Resources
There are no major rivers within the impact area of 10 Km. The study area has a few water
surface bodies like natural lakes/ponds. In order to have an idea of the quality of water
flowing in the region, representative water samples were collected and analyzed according to
the drinking water standards.
3.9.2 Ground water resources
Ground water is the accumulation of water below the ground surface, caused by rainfall and
its subsequent percolation through pores and crevices. Percolated water accumulates till it
reaches the impervious strata consisting of confined clay/rocks. Occurrence of ground water is
controlled by landform, structure and lithology. These resources are predominantly exploited
in most of the nearby villages only for domestic and agricultural purposes. Ground water
abstraction is by means of bore wells.
3.9.3 Reconnaissance
To establish the baseline status of water environment, the existing representative sampling
locations for surface water and ground water within a radial distance of 10 Km radial from the
site, have been selected as per CPCB guidelines of Water Quality Monitoring through an
adequate survey of the project area. The predominant rainfall in this region occurs during the
southwest monsoon season (June to September).The prevailing status of water quality at eight
sampling locations each for ground water and surface water has been assessed during
September to December.
Grab samples were collected once during the study period. Physico-chemical and
microbiological parameters have been analyzed to establish the baseline status of surface water
and ground water resources in the study area. Methods as per IS (IS 10500:2012) and APHA
were adopted for analysis of these parameters. The sampling protocol specified in the
“Guidelines for Water Quality Management”, of CPCB was followed for sampling, preservation
and transport of samples to the lab.
The locations of the sampling points are depicted in Figure-3.4 and Figure-3.5 and details of
representative water sampling locations are also tabulated in Table-3.10 and Table 3.11.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 69
Figure 3-4: Ground Water monitoring locations
Table 3-10 Details of Ground Water Sampling Locations
SampleCode
SamplingLocations
Geographical Coordinates Direction withrespect to
Project Site
Approx. Aerialdistance fromproject site in
KmGW1 Byranhalli Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 17.3’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 55’ 59.2’’SW 5.4
GW2 Gangapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 08’ 06.0’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 32.0’’
SE 9.8
GW3 Mylapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 20.1’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 52’ 41.4’’
NW 9.5
GW4 Doddashivara Lat.- N 13ᵒ 01’ 55.7’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 59’ 13.4’’
SE 6
GW5 Vokkaleri Lat.- N 13ᵒ 04’ 14.0’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 02’ 25.0’’
SE 8.16
GW6 Arabikothanur Lat.- N 13ᵒ 07’ 16.9’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 02’ 33.2’’
NE 8.2
GW7 Narsapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 08’ 09.0’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 00’ 56.4’’
NE 6.73
GW8 Malur Lat.- N 13ᵒ 00’ 57.0’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 07.4’’
SW 9.5
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 70
Figure 3-5: Surface Water monitoring locations
Table 3-11 : Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations
SampleCode
SamplingLocations
Geographical Coordinates Direction withrespect to
Project Site
Approx. Aerialdistance fromproject site in
KmSW1 Gangapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 07’ 59.0’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 50.7’’SE 9.8
SW2 Chiknalala Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 06.2’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 53’ 54.6’’
SE 7.2
SW3 Jakkasandra Lat.- N 13ᵒ 05’ 24.0’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 57’ 39.9’’
SW 0.9
SW4 Doddashivara Lat.- N 13ᵒ 01’ 39.2’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 59’ 23.4’’
SE 5.8
SW5 Arabikothanuru Lat.- N 13ᵒ 07’ 46.9’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 02’ 03.9’’
NE 8.2
SW6 Narsapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 07’ 56.0’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 00’ 12.6’’
NE 6.7
SW7 Shivarapattna Lat.- N 13ᵒ 05’ 54.7’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 99’ 52.5’’
SE 3.5
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 71
SampleCode
SamplingLocations
Geographical Coordinates Direction withrespect to
Project Site
Approx. Aerialdistance fromproject site in
KmSW8 Malur Lat.- N 13ᵒ 00’ 53.9’’
Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 01.0’’SW 9.5
The physicochemical and biological characteristics of surface water and ground water in the
study area and the methods used for water quality assessment are presented in the Table 3.12
and are compared with the Indian standards/specifications for drinking water.
Table 3-12 : Test Methods used for analysis of water quality parameters
S.No. Parameters Unit Test Method Limits as per IS 10500:2012
AcceptableLimit
PermissibleLimit
1) Color Hazen IS 3025 (Part-4) 1983 (Reaff 2006) 5 152) Odor - IS 3025 (Part 5) 1983 (Reaff 2006) Agreeable Agreeable3) pH at 25ᵒC - IS 3025(Part 11) 1983(Reaff 2006) 6.5-8.5 No
Relaxation4) Electrical
ConductivityµS/cm IS 3025 (Part 14) 1983 (Reaff 2006)
5) Turbidity NTU IS 3025 (Part10) 1984 (Reaff 2006) 1 56) Total
DissolvedSolids
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 16) 1984(Reaff 2006) 500 2000
7) TotalHardness asCaCO3
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 21) 1983 (Reaff 2006) 200 600
8) TotalAlkalinity asCaCO3
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 23) 1986 (Reaff 2009) 200 600
9) Chloride asCl
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 32) 1988 (Reaff 2009) 250 1000
10) Sulfate asSO4
mg/l IS 3025(Part 24) 1986(Reaff 2009) 200 400
11) Fluoride as F mg/l IS 3025 (Part 60) 2008 1.0 1.512) Nitrate as
NO3
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 34) 45 Norelaxation
13) Phosphate asPO4
mg/l IS 3025 (Part31) 1988 --
14) Sodium asNa
mg/l IS 3025(Pt 45) 1993 (Reaff 2006) --
15) Potassium asK
mg/l IS 3025 (Part45) 1993 (Reaff 2006) --
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 72
S.No. Parameters Unit Test Method Limits as per IS 10500:2012
AcceptableLimit
PermissibleLimit
16) Calcium asCa
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 40) 1991 (Reaff 2009) 75 200
17) Magnesiumas Mg
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 46) 1994 (Reaff 2009) 30 100
18) Iron as Fe mg/l IS 3025 (Part 53) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 0.3 Norelaxation
19) ChemicalOxygenDemand
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 58) 2006 --
20) Aluminiumas Al
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 55) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 0.03 0.2
21) Cyanide asCN
mg/l IS 3025 (Part 27) 1986 (Reaff 2009) 0.05 Norelaxation
22) Iron as Fe mg/l IS 3025 (Part 53) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 0.3 Norelaxation
23) Boron as B mg/l IS 3025 (Part 57) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 0.5 1.024) Zinc as Zn mg/l IS 3025(Part 49) 1994 (Reaff 2009) 5 1525) Chromium
as Crmg/l IS 3025 (Part 52) 2003 (Reaff 2009) 0.05 No
relaxation26) BOD,3 days
@ 27ᵒCmg/l IS 3025 (Part 44) 1993 --
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 73
Table 3-13: Ground water analysis results
S.No Parameters Unit Byranhalli
GW1
Gangapura
GW2
Mylapura
GW3
Doddashivara
GW4
Vokkaleri
GW5
Arabikothanur
GW6
Narsapura
GW7
Malur
GW8
1 Color Hazen BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL(DL
1.0)
2 Turbidity NTU BDL (DL
0.1)
BDL (DL
0.1)
BDL (DL
0.1)
BDL (DL 0.1) BDL (DL
0.1)
BDL (DL 0.1) BDL (DL
0.1)
BDL(DL
0.1)
3 pH -- 7.4 7.51 7.64 7.91 7.76 7.23 7.78 7.97
4 Electrical
Conductivity
µS/cm 741 731 852 853 1525 148 165 411
5 Total dissolved
solids
mg/l 546 570 632 613 1030 118 128 308
6 Total alkalinity as
CaCO3
mg/l 180 230 270 190 310 48 52 125
7 Total Hardness as
CaCO3
mg/l 260 270 330 250 530 50 54 125
8 Calcium as Ca mg/l 68 68 100 60 140 5.6 16 36
9 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 21.6 24 19.2 24 43.2 8.6 3.36 8.4
10 Sodium mg/l 64 66 45 86 105 21 13 35
11 Potassium mg/l 2 4 4 4 11 1 1 2
12 Chloride as Cl mg/l 97 97 107 126 248 14 18 26
13 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 68.9 21.2 20.6 75.7 99.5 8.3 8.5 42.1
14 Carbonate mg/l NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
15 Bi carbonate mg/l 220 281 329 232 378 59 63 153
16 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l 14.1 25.8 27.8 21.9 32.3 0.46 0.2 1.5
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 74
S.No Parameters Unit Byranhalli
GW1
Gangapura
GW2
Mylapura
GW3
Doddashivara
GW4
Vokkaleri
GW5
Arabikothanur
GW6
Narsapura
GW7
Malur
GW8
17 Fluorides as F mg/l 0.2 1.1 BDL (DL
0.2)
1.2 0.642 0.27 0.12 0.62
18 Cyanide mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
19 Arsenic mg/l BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL 0.005) BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
20 Cadmium mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
21 Chromium(Total) mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
22 Copper mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
23 Iron mg/l 0.19 0.21 0.23 0.14 0.16 0.29 0.15 0.15
24 Lead mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
25 Zinc mg/l 2.1 0.44 0.05 0.03 0.37 0.02 0.025 0.48
26 Manganese mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
27 Nickel mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
28 Selenium mg/l BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL 0.005) BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
29 Mercury mg/l BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL 0.001) BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
30 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 75
S.No Parameters Unit Byranhalli
GW1
Gangapura
GW2
Mylapura
GW3
Doddashivara
GW4
Vokkaleri
GW5
Arabikothanur
GW6
Narsapura
GW7
Malur
GW8
31 COD mg/l BDL (DL
4.0)
BDL (DL
4.0)
BDL (DL
4.0)
BDL (DL 4.0) BDL (DL
4.0)
BDL (DL 4.0) BDL (DL
4.0)
BDL (DL
4.0)
32 BOD mg/l BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL
1.0)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 76
Table 3-14: Surface water analysis results
S.No Parameters Unit Gangapura
SW1
Chiknalala
SW2
Jakkasandra
SW3
Doddashivara
SW4
Arabikothanur
SW5
Narsapura
SW6
Shivarapatna
SW7
Malur
SW8
1 Color Hazen BDL (DL
1.0)
30 BDL (DL
1.0)
15 5 BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL 1.0) 4
2 Turbidity NTU 4 24 2 18 15 4 BDL (DL 0.1) 32
3 pH -- 7.33 6.75 7.43 7.02 6.96 7.27 9.84 7.25
4 Electrical
Conductivity
µS/cm 468 123 472 155 110 164 320 120
5 Total dissolved
solids
mg/l 304 84 326 128 82 126 254 94
6 Total alkalinity as
CaCO3
mg/l 80 28 125 62 38 36 118 47
7 Total Hardness as
CaCO3
mg/l 125 28 90 58 23 44 34 43
8 Calcium as Ca mg/l 40 4.8 26 16 5.2 12 8 14
9 Magnesium as Mg mg/l 6 3.84 6 4.32 2.4 3.4 3.4 2
10 Sodium mg/l 20 3 52 3 8 12 50 3
11 Potassium mg/l 29 8 17 7 4 5 7 4
12 Chloride as Cl mg/l 30 10 49 9 7 24 35 4.4
13 Sulphate as SO4 mg/l 68.7 15.16 20.9 8.6 2.5 23.2 4.6 5.1
14 Carbonate mg/l NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
15 Bi carbonate mg/l 98 34 153 76 46 44 144 57
16 Nitrate as NO3 mg/l BDL (DL
1.0)
1.66 BDL (DL
1.0)
1.06 BDL (DL 1.0) BDL (DL
1.0)
BDL (DL 1.0) 1
17 Fluorides as F mg/l BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL BDL (DL 0.2) BDL (DL 0.2) BDL (DL 0.32 BDL (DL
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 77
S.No Parameters Unit Gangapura
SW1
Chiknalala
SW2
Jakkasandra
SW3
Doddashivara
SW4
Arabikothanur
SW5
Narsapura
SW6
Shivarapatna
SW7
Malur
SW8
0.2) 0.2) 0.2) 0.2) 0.2)
18 Cyanide mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
19 Arsenic mg/l BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
20 Cadmium mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
21 Chromium(Total) mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
22 Copper mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
23 Iron mg/l 0.13 2.18 0.47 1.84 2.18 1.23 0.43 2.6
24 Lead mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
25 Zinc mg/l 0.34 0.041 0.025 0.04 0.04 0.019 0.03 0.013
26 Manganese mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
27 Nickel mg/l BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL 0.01) BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
BDL (DL
0.01)
28 Selenium mg/l BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
BDL (DL
0.005)
29 Mercury mg/l BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
BDL (DL
0.001)
30 Dissolved Oxygen mg/l 5.6 4.9 5.2 4.5 5.4 6.2 5.3 4.9
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 78
S.No Parameters Unit Gangapura
SW1
Chiknalala
SW2
Jakkasandra
SW3
Doddashivara
SW4
Arabikothanur
SW5
Narsapura
SW6
Shivarapatna
SW7
Malur
SW8
31 COD mg/l 4.2 BDL (DL
4.0)
4.4 BDL (DL 4.0) 4.2 5.1 4.1 BDL (DL
4.0)
32 BOD mg/l BDL (DL
1.0)
2.1 2.5 2.4 2.1 3.1 2.8 2.5
3.9.4 Inference
3.9.4.1 Ground Water
The analysis of ground water results indicate that the average pH ranges in between 7.2-7.9, TDS ranges from 118-1030 mg/l,
Total hardness ranges from 50-530 mg/l, Iron content ranges from 0.14-0.29 mg/l, nitrate content ranges from 0.2-32.3 mg/l.
The analysis results are presented in Table 3.13.
3.9.4.2 Surface water
The analysis of ground water results indicate that the average pH ranges in between 6.9-7.3, TDS ranges from 80-326 mg/l, Total
hardness ranges from 23-125 mg/l, DO ranges from 4.5-6.2 mg/l. The analysis results are presented in Table 3.14.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 79
3.9.5 Ground water Scenario
3.9.5.1Hydrogeology of Kolar District
Granites, gneisses, schists, laterites and alluvium underlie the district. Basic dykes intrude the
above formations at places. Granites and gneisses occupy major portion of the district. Schists
are mostly confined to two places - around Kolar Gold Fields and in the northwestern part of
Gauribidanurtaluk. Laterites occupy small portions in Kolar, Srinivaspura and
Sidlaghattataluks. Alluvium is confined to river courses. Fractures or lineaments occupy
welldefined structural valleys and majority of them trend NE-SW. (Source: CGWA report,
Kolar District, 2012)
The occurrence and movement of ground water is controlled by weathered zone and
fractures and fissures that exist in hard rocks. In the district, ground water occurs in phreatic
and semi-confined to confined conditions. It also occurs in alluvium under water table
conditions. The weathered thickness varies from 6 to 18 m in the majority of the area,
except in parts of Sidlaghatta and Chikballapura taluks where it ranges from 40 to 60 m.
The depth of water level in piezometer generally ranges from 12 to 49 mbgl. The ground
water levels are essentially controlled by physiographic features and rainfall distribution.
The appreciable change in ground water levels was noticed close to over exploitation areas,
where local troughs are observed. (Source: CGWA report, Kolar District, 2012)
3.9.5.2Geomorphology of Kolar District
The topography of the district is undulating to plain. The central and eastern parts of the
district forming the valley of Palar Basin, are well cultivated. The northern part of the
district forms a depression forming the valley of the North Pinakini River towards
Gauribidanur. The general elevation varies from 249 to 911 m above mean sea level. The soils
of Kolar district occur on different landforms such as hills, ridges, pediments, plains and
valleys. The types of soils distributed range from red loamy soil to red sandy soil and lateritic
soil. Soil distribution map is given in figure 3.6. Of the total area, about 73% is suitable
for agriculture and horticulture; about 3% for forestry, pasture and the remaining area is
suitable for quarrying, mining and as habitat for wildlife. (Source: CGWA report, Kolar
District, 2012)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 80
Figure 3-6:Hydrogeology Map of Kolar District
(Source : CGWA report, Kolar District, 2012)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 81
3.10 Soil Environment
The present study of the soil quality was carried out at eight sampling locations to establish the
baseline characteristics of the study area and to determine the impact of the proposed project
on the soil characteristics. The details of the soil sampling locations are presented in Table 3.15
and shown in Figure 3.7. The results are presented in Table 3.16.
Table 3-15: Details of Soil Monitoring Locations
SampleCode
SamplingLocations
Geographical Coordinates Direction withrespect to Project
Site
Aerial distancefrom project
site in Km
S1 Project Site Lat.- N 13ᵒ 05’ 02.7’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 57’ 49.6’’
-- --
S2 Gangapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 08’ 06.2’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 32.2’’
SE 9.8
S3 Doddashivara Lat.- N 13ᵒ 01’ 39.7’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 59’ 20.7’’
SE 6.0
S4 Vokkaleri Lat.- N 13ᵒ 05’ 04.0’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 03’ 09.7’’
SE 8.16
S5 Arabikothanur Lat.- N 13ᵒ 06’ 50.6’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 02’ 43.7’’
NE 8.2
S6 Narsapura Lat.- N 13ᵒ 07’ 56.3’’Long.-E 078ᵒ 00’ 12.9’’
NE 6.73
S7 Shivarapatna Lat.- N 13ᵒ 05’ 54.9’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 99’ 52.8’’
SE 3.5
S8 Malur Lat.- N 13ᵒ 00’ 53.6’’Long.-E 077ᵒ 56’ 01.3’’
SW 9.5
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 82
Figure 3-7 Soil monitoring locations
Figure 3-8 Soil sampling Photographs
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 83
Table 3-16: Soil Monitoring Locations
S.No Parameters Unit SHV Project
Site (S1)
Gangapura
(S2)
Doddashivara
(S3)
Vokkaleri
(S4)
Arabikothanur
(S5)
Narsapura
(SW6)
Shivarapatna
(SW7)
Malur
(SW8)
1 Color Brown Brown Brown Light
Brown
Brown Brown Brown Creamish
Brown
2 Soil Texture Loamy sand Sandy clay Sandy loam loam clay silt loam loam clay
3 Sand % 74 54 64 42 24 34 35 10
4 Silt % 20 28 25 43 34 53 41 38
5 Clay % 6 18 11 15 42 13 24 52
6 pH 7.25 7.85 8.38 7.73 8.52 8.11 8.24 8.17
7 Electrical
Conductivity
umhos/cm 36 109 176 51 126 122 214 248
8 Infiltration rate cm/hr 1.38 1.34 1.32 1.04 1.02 1.41 1.04 1.33
9 Bulk density gm/cc 1.29 1.28 1.26 1.35 1.39 1.17 1.36 1.25
10 Cation Exchange
Capacity
meq/
100 gm
3 7 8 4 24 10 12 22
11 Moisture Content % 3.59 8.89 52.33 9.71 16.47 9.29 17.66 13.28
12 Water Holding
capacity
% 36 40 31 34 42 35 32 44
13 Organic Carbon % 0.35 0.56 0.22 0.32 0.30 0.53 0.26 0.55
14 Organic matter % 0.61 0.97 0.37 0.55 0.52 0.91 0.45 0.94
15 Nitrogen as N % 0.06 0.15 0.21 0.11 0.18 0.14 0.23 0.12
16 Phosphorous % 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.08
17 Potassium % 0.15 0.21 0.24 0.18 0.22 0.21 0.31 0.16
18 Calcium % 0.08 0.32 0.2 0.28 0.4 0.48 0.24 0.68
19 Magnesium % 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.09 0.19 0.18 0.26
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 84
S.No Parameters Unit SHV Project
Site (S1)
Gangapura
(S2)
Doddashivara
(S3)
Vokkaleri
(S4)
Arabikothanur
(S5)
Narsapura
(SW6)
Shivarapatna
(SW7)
Malur
(SW8)
20 Boron mg/Kg 2.1 0.45 0.32 1.34 2.1 2.4 1.9 0.68
21 Cadmium mg/Kg 0.014 0.016 0.019 0.015 0.012 0.011 0.017 0.011
22 Copper mg/Kg 14.2 5.6 2.3 14.1 16.4 18.1 14.2 12.5
23 Chromium mg/Kg 1.2 0.8 1.1 0.8 1.2 1.4 1.1 0.4
24 Iron mg/Kg 13700 13400 41.74 7600 13640 11500 29400 17520
25 Lead mg/Kg 0.02 0.01 0.015 0.017 0.021 0.015 0.012 0.018
26 Manganese mg/Kg 10.1 3.2 1.1 6.1 12.5 16.8 10.8 8.4
27 Zinc mg/Kg 20.45 7.4 1.5 12.2 21 32.2 21.8 16.8
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 85
3.10.1 Observations
It is observed that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 7.25-8.52 indicating that the
soils are alkaline in nature
Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from to 36-248 μS/cm. As the EC value is less
than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in nature
The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 31-44 (%).
Nitrogen as N value varies from 0.06-0.23 %
Potassium content ranges from 0.15-0.31%
Phosphorous from 0.05-0.18%
3.11 Ecological Environment
Natural flora and fauna are important features of environment. They are organized into
communities with mutual dependencies among their member families and show various
responses and sensitivities to outside influences. A biological system comprises of both plant
and animal communities, which interact not only among themselves but also with the abiotic
components, viz. physical and chemical characteristics of the environment. Therefore, nature
of developments and baseline characteristics of terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna around
the site of proposed activities is required to be assessed. The study involved in collection of
primary data by carrying out survey in the 10 Km study area and also from the secondary data
of the particular area.
Plants and animals are more susceptible to environmental stress. A change in the composition
of biotic communities is reflected by a change in the distribution pattern, frequency, density
and abundance of natural species of flora and fauna existing in the ecosystem. These changes
over a span of time can be quantified and related to the existing environmental factors.
Assessment of area surrounding the site for plant and animal species was carried out by field
survey and collecting the available information from authentic sources.
Table 3-17 Flora in the Study area
S.No. Botanical Name Local Name
1) Mangifera indica Maavinamara2) Eucalyptus globules Niligirimara3) Eleusine coracana Ragi4) Tamarindus indica Hunsemara5) Ficus benghalensis Aaladamara
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 86
S.No. Botanical Name Local Name
6) Azadirchta indica Bevinamara7) Ficus religiosa Aralimara8) Grevillea robusta ---9) Cocos nucifera Tenginamara10) Manikara zapota Sapota11) Syzygium cumini Nerlemara12) Ficus carica Anjura13) Polyalthia longifolia Ashoka14) Ficus racemosa Atthi15) Dalbergia sissoo Beete16) Emblica officinalis Bettadanellikai17) Muntungia calabura Gasagasemara18) Artocarpus heterphyllus Halasnemara19) Pongemia pinnata Honge20) Moringa oleifera Nugge21) Tectona grandis Teak
Table 3-18 Fauna in the Study area
S.No. Zoological Name Common Names
1) Bostaurus Cow2) Ovis aries Sheep3) Syncerus caffer Buffalo4) Bombyx mori Silk worms5) Susscrofa domesticus Pigs6) Macca fascicularis Monkey7) Hipposideroshypo phyllus Kolar leaf-nosed bat8) Felis catus Cat
3.12 Socio-Economic Environment
3.12.1 District Profile:
Kolar district is located in the southern region of the State and is the eastern-most district of the
Karnataka State. The district is bounded by the Bangalore Rural district in the west
Chikballapur district in the north, Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh in the east and on the
south by Krishnagiri and Vellore district of Tamil Nadu. The total area is 3979 sq. km.
Kolar district has one sub division and five taluks. Kolar sub - division comprises of Kolar,
Bangarpet, Malur, Srinivaspura & Mulbagal.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 87
Demography: The district population as per 2011 Census was 1536401 comprises of the
male population of 776396 and the female population 760005. (Source: India Census 2011)
3.12.2 District Social Indicators:
Table 3-19 Social Indicators
S.No Description1 The Population Density 386
2 The decadal growth rate 10.8%
3 The district Sex ratio 979
4 The district child Sex ratio 962
5 The literacy rate 74.4%
6 The male literacy rate 81.8%
7 The female literacy rate 66.8%
8 The Scheduled Caste population 30.3%
9 The Scheduled Tribe population 5.1%
10 The district work participation of 46.7%.
11 The work participation rates for Male 58.5%
12 The work participation rates for Female 34.7%
13 The Main Workers 81.4%
14 Rural population 68.75%
3.12.3 Occupation:
The primary sector has more workers as 53.53% of workers involved in agriculture and its
allied activities. Since the district is very close to Bangalore and Hosur, 43.10% of workers are
in Secondary and tertiary sectors like manufacture and service sectors.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 88
Figure 3-9 Workers Category
Source: Census2011
3.12.3.1 Agriculture Profile of the District
1. Agriculture is the highest contributor in the economic development of the district.
2. Cocoon productivity in Kolar is 900 Kg/Ha; this is higher than the state average of 601
Kg/Ha.
3. Average annual income generated by Sericulture in the district is US $ 33.40 million (INR
160 crores)
4. District average of milk production is 7.65 liters/day as compared to state average of 5.83
litres/day.
5. Major food crops - Ragi, Maize, Rice, Tur, Horse gram, Avare, Green gram, Groundnut,
Sunflower
6. Major horticulture crops- Mango, Banana, Guava, Sapota, Grapes, Coconut, Beetle-wine,
Cashew, Tomato, Onion, Brinjal,Drum stick
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 89
3.12.4 Land holding pattern of the District:
The following table shows a land holding pattern of Karnataka state, Kolar district and Malur
Taluk where the project site is located. The taluk has more marginal farmers. The increase of
marginal farmers is due to fragmentation of ancestral land.
Table 3-20 Land holding status
Land Holding status- State Vs District Vs Talukin %
Size of Holding(Ha) State District TalukBelow 0.5 27.39 41.27 44.150.5 - 1.0 21.75 25.92 25.501.0 - 2.0 27.30 20.82 19.112.0 - 3.0 11.10 6.55 6.083.0 - 4.0 5.08 2.61 2.454.0 - 5.0 2.70 1.22 1.135.0 - 7.5 2.79 1.06 1.057.5 - 10.0 1.03 0.32 0.3110.0 - 20.0 0.78 0.20 0.2020.0 & ABOVE 0.08 0.02 0.02
Source: Agricultural census 2010-11
3.12.5 Industries:
The existing industrial estates are TamakaKolar,KGF, Malur Phase I, II, III and IV, Kyalanoor
and Mulbagal.
3.12.6 Education:
There are 1300 Primary schools, 917 Middle schools , 309 Secondary & senior secondary
schools,106 Colleges Nos. 106 in the district.
3.12.7 Health:
The district has got good health facilities.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 90
Table 3-21 District Health Infrastructure facilities
Facilities Name of Taluks DistrictBangarpet Kolar Malur Mulbagal Srinivaspur
Sub Centres 55 64 46 58 42 265Primary HealthCentres
8 14 9 17 13 61
Communityhealthcentres
1 0 0 0 1 2
DistrictHospital
0 1 0 0 0 1
MedicalCollage
0 1 0 0 0 1
AYUSH(Public)
0 2 1 0 2 5
Pvt. Hospital 9 15 9 4 3 40Total 73 97 65 79 61 375
Source: National Rural Health Mission
3.12.8 Project area (10 Km Radius)
The project area is mainly rural in nature with few urban areas like Malur etc. The area’s main
occupation is agriculture. The main crops are Ragi, horticulture crops. As there is no perennial
river, people undertake non-irrigated agriculture.
The following table depicts the villages in the 10 km radius area and demographic details.
Table 3-22 Villages around 10km radius form the project site
S.No Village Name Tota
lH
ouse
hold
Tota
lPo
pula
tion
Tota
l Mal
epo
pula
tion
Tota
l Fem
ale
popu
latio
n
Tota
lSc
hedu
led
Cas
tepo
pula
tion
Tota
lSc
hedu
led
trib
epo
pula
tion
Malur Taluk1 Abbenahalli 322 1436 727 709 211 832 Alahalli 119 582 306 276 151 1433 Bellavi 152 628 328 300 117 04 Bhoovanahalli 267 1188 601 587 214 3495 Byrasandra 51 267 149 118 122 46 Chavvenahalli 126 561 290 271 49 07 Chikkakadathur 124 587 301 286 295 173
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 91
S.No Village Name Tota
lH
ouse
hold
Tota
lPo
pula
tion
Tota
l Mal
epo
pula
tion
Tota
l Fem
ale
popu
latio
n
Tota
lSc
hedu
led
Cas
tepo
pula
tion
Tota
lSc
hedu
led
trib
epo
pula
tion
8 Chikkasabbenahalli 42 207 95 112 12 09 Chikkashivara 80 377 176 201 109 4
10 Doddasabbenahalli 118 575 297 278 73 011 Doddashivara 327 1443 727 716 332 6012 Dombarahalli 63 321 155 166 208 013 Gerupura 141 638 325 313 356 014 Jakkasandra 95 469 252 217 160 18915 Jodipura 120 527 275 252 0 13216 Kambipura 91 410 203 207 290 017 Kodihalli 279 1255 630 625 233 018 Kondarahalli 80 302 162 140 2 019 Korachanoor 77 350 182 168 202 020 M.Sonnahalli 1 5 3 2 0 021 Madivala 260 1052 526 526 514 622 Malur (TMC) 9412 40050 20377 19673 6806 140323 Mindahalli 183 819 401 418 87 24524 Muthakadahalli 107 563 268 295 133 14625 Mylandahalli 288 1252 624 628 146 5126 Nambiganahalli 106 518 275 243 82 027 Obalapura 51 215 110 105 168 1928 Panamakanahalli 106 574 300 274 195 13929 Seethanaikanahalli 63 266 137 129 233 030 Seethappanahalli 64 339 184 155 34 6131 Shivarapatna 456 2174 1100 1074 162 37932 Thambihalli 135 703 356 347 144 233 ThornaHalli 590 2717 1441 1276 305 99634 Vadaganahalli 135 624 303 321 222 3835 Vardenahalli 15 61 28 33 43 0
Kolar Taluk36 Achatnahalli 129 520 254 266 27 037 Appasandra 106 483 260 223 12 038 Arabikothanur 362 1649 823 826 724 33239 Banakanahalli 77 358 187 171 28 040 Belamarnahalli 294 1321 673 648 479 0
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 92
S.No Village Name Tota
lH
ouse
hold
Tota
lPo
pula
tion
Tota
l Mal
epo
pula
tion
Tota
l Fem
ale
popu
latio
n
Tota
lSc
hedu
led
Cas
tepo
pula
tion
Tota
lSc
hedu
led
trib
epo
pula
tion
41 Chikkaiyyur 105 504 266 238 88 17642 Chikkavallabi 58 226 112 114 5 9443 Doddaiyyur 128 534 265 269 147 044 Gottihalli 183 921 484 437 331 345 Guddanapura 41 215 105 110 0 8146 Kendatti 165 825 434 391 306 047 KendattiGollahalli 23 90 46 44 0 4348 Khajikallahalli 153 769 376 393 253 549 Koothandahalli 79 371 186 185 117 050 Kurki 146 605 287 318 182 051 Madivala 402 1997 1023 974 422 22852 NagalapuraGollahalli 22 118 59 59 24 053 Vokkaleri 824 3571 1750 1821 860 248
Hosakotte taluk54 Alagondahalli 89 486 262 224 96 055 Banamakanahalli 84 420 218 202 193 056 Beerahalli 144 598 302 296 252 057 Chikkanahalli 160 686 339 347 261 358 Chikkanallala 109 560 283 277 320 059 Chikkathaggali 78 365 194 171 118 360 Doddaganahalli 49 211 113 98 6 2361 Doddathaggali 99 450 235 215 226 062 Manchappanahalli 133 625 309 316 235 063 Mugabala 378 1740 898 842 575 1164 MugabalaHosahalli 76 356 185 171 194 065 Mylapura 123 592 299 293 57 066 Poojaramanahalli 79 412 204 208 135 067 Thimmapura 6 27 11 16 0 068 Ummalu 217 907 438 469 358 1469 Yelachahalli 250 1251 647 604 128 170 Yelachammanahalli 51 232 114 118 210 8
Total 20068 89050 45255 43795 19779 5895
Source: India Census 2011
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 93
The family size of the area is 4.44. The area constitutes 22.21% of Scheduled Caste population
and 6.61 % of Scheduled tribe population.
3.12.8.1 Occupation:
Agriculture is the main occupation of the area. Nearly 80% of people are main workers as they
have works more than 6 months a year. There are 41% of workers involved in agriculture and
allied activities.
Figure 3-10 Workers status around 10 Km radius of the site
Source: India Census 2011
3.12.8.2 Land Use details
The major portion of the area comes under agriculture. The forest area is very
negligible.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 94
Figure 3-11 Land Use Pattern around 10 Km radius
3.12.9 Village Profile:
The village Jakkasandra comes under Abbenahalli village Panchayat of Malur taluk of Kolar
district. The area of the village is 370.89 Ha. As per 2011 Census, the number of households
in the village was 95, the population of the village was 469 which consist of 252 (53.73%)
male and 217(46.26%) female. The size of the family is 4.94.
Though the major part of the land is being used as agricultural land (278.94 Ha), the majority
of workers employed in non-agriculture activities. It is due to the industrialization in nearby
areas and proximity to Malur town and Bangalore City. As per 2011 Census data, only 15% of
workers are in agriculture and related activities.
The main source of irrigation is tube wells. Ragi and horticultural crops are the main crops of
the area. There is no forest land in the village.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 95
Figure 3-12 Land Use Pattern of the Jakkasandra Village
Source: India Census 2011
The village has one primary school. For higher education, they need to visit Malur.
3.12.10Interaction with locals
We had much interaction with farmers, teachers and other elderly people of the village.
1. Most of the farmers are small and marginal farmers in the village.
2. The proportion of socially disadvantaged groups such as Scheduled Castes (SCs) and
Scheduled Tribes (STs) is higher among marginal and smaller farmers than that of
medium and large farmers.
3. As men are migrating to non-farm sector, involvement of women in agriculture has
increased. They have involved in seed production, sowing, in applying manure,
fertilizer and pesticides, weeding, transplanting, threshing, winnowing and harvesting.
Their involvement in other income generating activities like animal husbandry and
dairying, a collection of non timber forest produces, backyard poultry, and the
collection of fuel wood, fodder etc. has increased.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 96
4. Most important problems for the small farmers are output price fluctuations. There is a
big gap between producer prices and consumer prices. They are forced to sell their
produce due to their financial commitments.
5. Agricultural Marketing: Due to their low level socioeconomic conditions and lack of
awareness, agriculture products being sold at distress to local traders and middlemen.
6. Scarcity of capital: Agriculture is also requiring capital for farming. As most of farmers
are marginal and small, they do not have money on hand to start cultivation. They have
to borrow money. They borrow at high interest rate and sell at low price.
7. Shift from farm occupation to non-farm occupation is seen in rural areas due to the
non availability of agriculture activities throughout the year. Construction jobs are
most preferable due to the demand in the nearby towns.
8. People expecting non polluting industries to their nearby places so that they need not
migrate to other places.
9. Industries could impart skill development training program for the local youths and
give preference to them in job opportunities.
10. Agri based industries can be encouraged to tap local resources so that wastage of
perishable agricultural products could be avoided.
3.12.11Conclusion:
As they have seen the industrialization in Bangalore and Malur, have opinions on both positive
and negative sides of Industrialization. They welcome any industrialization, but more
concerned about the pollution and loss of agricultural land and agriculture.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 97
Figure 3-13 Photographs of Interaction with locals
Gangapura village -Interaction with a farmer Shivarapatna village - Interaction with asculptor
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 98
4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
MEASURES
4.1 Introduction
Environmental Impact is any change in the environmental attributes, adverse or beneficial,
caused or induced by the proposed action or set of actions. The predicted adverse impacts
during each stage of project development are superimposed over the baseline status of the
existing environmental quality to infer the scenario of environmental conditions in the post-
project stage. The main purpose of identifying the impacts is that it helps in adopting
appropriate mitigation measures for the adverse consequences if any.
This Chapter focuses on predicting and evaluating the various significant impacts that are
likely to occur upon the onset of the proposed LPG bottling facility. The impacts on the
environmental indices viz. air, water, soil, noise, biological and socioeconomic conditions are
scrutinized methodically and assessed.
The most likely impacts on the environment due to the proposed project need to be appraised
during the two different phases of the project namely pre-operation/construction phase and
operation phase. The particulars on impacts that could be triggered on the environmental
attributes by the activities of the proposed project are discussed below.
4.2 Construction Phase
4.2.1 Activities during Construction Phase
During the construction phase, the following activities among many are considered to be
important towards creating environmental impacts:
a) Site preparation (fencing, boundary & clearing of site)
b) Excavation, backfilling and levelling
c) Hauling and dumping of earth materials & construction spoils
d) Foundation works
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 99
e) Fabrication erection of Steel structures such as, Tanks, Pipelines and Sheds.
f) Construction of internal roads, drains & water supply
g) Painting and finishing
h) Cleaning, landscaping and plantations
The activities can be divided into two categories, viz.
Sub-structural
Super-structural work.
Sub-structural construction work will involve cutting of trenches, excavation, concreting etc.
All these activities will give rise to dust pollution. The super-structural work will involve
concrete & masonry work etc. and will involve construction equipment like cranes, concrete
mixers, hoists, welding sets etc. There may be dust, gaseous and noise pollution from these
activities. Concrete and masonry works involve considerable amount of water, which generally
induce certain impact on the local water source.
Mechanical erection work involves extensive use of mechanical equipment for storage,
transportation, erection and on-site fabrication work. These activities generally produce some
air contaminants and noise pollution. On the other hand electrical work is less polluting- in
general. The main sources of pollution & impacts during construction phase are cutting of few
trees, dust generation, noise generation by construction equipment & traffic, inflow of
construction labour, sediment load in construction water, and generation of solid waste in the
form of construction spoils.
4.2.2 Impacts during Construction Phase
Project activities during construction phase include laying of pipeline and construction of
Storage Terminal. These activities will result in dust generation, noise generation by
construction equipment & traffic, inflow of construction labour, sediment load in construction
water, and generation of solid waste in the form of construction spoils.
Therefore, construction phase activities would have moderate impacts on on-site noise & air
quality, land use and ecology. It could also develop minor impacts on on-site soils, water use
and water quality. The other impacts of construction phase will be small in magnitude as well
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 100
as temporary in nature and are expected to wear out gradually once the construction activity is
completed.
4.3 Activities during Operational Phase
During the operation stage, there will not be any significant sources of pollution & impacts.
The main activity during operation is storage & bottling of LPG in cylinders for domestic and
commercial use.
4.3.1 Impacts & Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase
Project activities during operation phase will be the transport of LPG to the site through truck
and storage & bottling of LPG. These activities will result in hazard prone area. Positive impacts
on socio-economic benefits and there will not be any other sources of pollution (except DG
Set) & negative impacts.
Therefore, operation phase activities would have moderate impacts on socio-economics. It
could also develop minor impacts on noise during transport of trucks. The main impact of
operation phase is hazardous chemical handling. But Socio-economic benefits and such
operational impacts are long term.
4.4 Receptors of impact, significant impacts and mitigation measures
4.4.1 During Construction Phase
4.4.1.1Land Environment
Impacts
The activities carried out during the establishment of this industry will involve a change in the
land use from an open industrial land to a built up industrial land, which will pose the
following impacts on the land environment.
Compaction of soil and a change in the soil structure due to the use of heavy
construction vehicles and machinery
Removal of soil from the site
Mixing of the topsoil and subsoil
Dispersion of dust
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 101
Mitigation measures
1) Employing techniques such as restricting access during wet conditions, using protective
boarding and low ground pressure machinery to minimize compaction of soil
2) The removed soil will be properly stored for subsequent reinstatement
3) Reuse of excess excavated material for road development, green belt development and
landscaping
4) A well designed closed depository for storage of construction materials to prevent
land/soil pollution
5) Effective stabilization of altered landforms to minimize soil erosion and the potential for
water pollution (e.g. Vegetation)
6) Reuse of construction wastes such as sand, brick, gravel, cement for developing internal
road and project structures.
4.4.1.2Air Environment
Impacts
The activities that might lead to a decline in the local air quality due to generation of dust are
Site Preparation-fencing, boundary and clearing of site
Excavation, backfilling, leveling,
Hauling and dumping of earth materials and construction spoils,
Foundation works
Fabrication, erection of steel structures such as tanks, pipelines and sheds,
Construction of internal roads, drains and water supply
Cleaning and landscaping
Mitigation measures
1) Barricading the construction area and minimizing exposed areas to reduce dust
generation
2) Areas generating dust during dry weather will be sprayed with water
3) Conserving the existing vegetation screens to act as a barrier to dust
4) Appropriate enclosed areas for storage of construction materials
5) Facilitating the workers with the required personal protective equipments
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 102
6) Efficient usage and maintenance of equipments/machineries to lower air emissions,
noise pollution and consumption of energy resource
7) Exhaust vent of DG set will be provided with adequate stack height to ensure quick
dispersal of gaseous emissions
8) Periodic monitoring and maintenance of transport vehicles to check on the quality of
emission to be within permissible limits and consumption of fuel
9) Regular inspection of construction site to ensure timely removal and disposal of
construction debris to the dumping sites or for recycle/reuse.
4.4.1.3Water Environment
Impacts
Contamination of watercourses by leakage from fuel and materials storage areas
Oil and suspended solids in run-off from vehicles and access roads
Use of heavy machinery and vehicles causes compaction of topsoil due to which a
change in the surface water drainage patters may occur
Mitigation measures
1) The water demand during the construction phase will be met from the private water
suppliers
2) Impenetrable lining will be provided to storage premises to avoid accidental mixing or
fugitive losses.
3) Storehouse will be located at a distance away from the water storage area to prevent
accidental release or spillage
4) Proper management of rain water run-off during monsoon and creating bunds to
utilize the rain water for construction purpose
5) An appropriate water management system will be implemented.
4.4.1.4Noise Environment
Impacts
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 103
The major sources of noise generation at the construction site are pneumatic hammers,
compressors, concrete mixers, operating machinery, horns and acoustic signals,
communication among workers.
Noise nuisance causes discomfort and health related issues in those who work at the site and
those who reside in the neighboring villages
Mitigation measures
1) Barricading the construction site
2) The existing green belt will help in reducing the noise nuisance
3) Selection of equipments of high quality
4) Proper planning and organizing of construction activities which will help in avoiding
loud verbal exchanges between the intervening parties
5) Transportation activities will be carried out only during the day and only in case of
emergency, the transportation activities will be permitted in night time
6) The vehicles used for construction activities and transportation of materials will be
provided with the horn of low noise level as recommended by RTO/ concerned
authorities
7) Minimization of operation time of noisy equipment and operation of
machineries/equipment that generate high levels of noise only during day time
8) Inadequate use of plant and equipment, namely, running on full power when the work
does not necessitate it will be avoided
9) Personal protective equipments, education and public awareness and exposure control
through rotation of work will be provided to the workers engaged in construction
activities in the area generating high levels of noise.
4.4.1.5 Waste generation
Impacts
Sources of waste are construction debris such as bricks, steel scrap, wooden scrap, sand, gravel
etc.
Mitigation measures
1) Prior to commencement of construction works, assessment of materials required,
location and planning of available space for its storage will be conducted
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 104
2) Quality control will be implemented to reject defective materials at the time of delivery
thus avoiding later disposal
3) Stockpiles of sand, gravel, soil will be situated in such a manner that they do not spill or
washed onto the adjacent roads
4) Materials that come in will be labeled and the date of receiving will be recorded
5) Preparation of a proper waste management system which includes identification of
wastes, collection, segregation, storage and disposal methods
6) Recycling and reuse of certain construction debris
7) Spent oils and other lubricants from equipment will be collected in enclosed containers
before disposing it to approved recyclers
4.4.1.6Ecology
The proposed facility is being established in the notified industrial area; hence no impacts have
been expected to arise on the biological environment. Except for the removal of weeds, the
ecological status of the site is well maintained by conserving the existing green belt at the site.
4.4.1.7Social Environment
The impacts of construction activities is beneficial on the social environment as it contributes
to the economic and social development by providing employment to about 70 workers during
the construction phase and thereby raising the standards of living and quality of life.
Procuring of construction materials locally leads to increase in trading opportunities.
4.4.2 Activities during Operation Phase
From an environmental perspective, this phase is of paramount significance due to its potential
to invoke long-term impacts. But as this installation is only a storage and filling terminal for
LPG, there won’t be any significant sources of pollution and impacts.
The adverse effects that are likely to occur during this operational phase of the project areAir
Pollution (gaseous emissions), Effluent generation, noise generation, solid waste generation.
4.4.2.1Air Environment
LPG will be transported through trucks from Tuticorin port via roadways to the bottling plant.
No emissions occur during the operations as the entire bottling process is carried out through
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 105
pipelines from storage area to filling shed. The only point source of emission is D.G sets which
are fitted with stacks of adequate height to disperse the pollutants.
4.4.2.2Water Environment
Total water requirement for the plant is 10 KLD which is sourced through KIADB water
supply. Hence there will be no effect on ground water or surface water during the operation
phase of this project.
Mitigation measures
1) The site will have well developed storm water layout and rain water harvesting pits to
maximize groundwater discharge
2) Domestic sewage generated will be treated through septic tank followed by soak pits.
3) Wastewater generated from cylinder washings and test bath unit will be primarily dirty
water with suspended solids, which will be subjected to sedimentation unit. The treated
water will be reused for cylinder washings.
4) Waste water generated from the paint booth will be treated in effluent treatment plant
prior to its discharge.
4.4.2.3Noise Environment
The only source of noise within the bottling plant is during the operation of D.G set. The noise
level is maintained within the permissible limits by placing the D.G sets within acoustic
enclosures and utilizing 33 % of the total plot area for green belt development.
4.4.2.4Land Environment
As the storage terminal will be located within the notified Jakkasandra Industrial area, the
proposed activity does not change the land use classification of the site.
Mitigation measures
1) Designated solid waste storage area will be allocated within the site.
2) Agreement will be made with TSDF for safe disposal of hazardous wastes
4.4.2.5Socio-Economic Environment
It creates employment for about 14 persons on direct basis and 50 persons on indirect basis.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 106
4.4.2.6Impact of transport of raw material and product:
Transport of Product:
Bulk LPG will be transported from Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu through 18 MT road tankers. It will
pass through Madurai, Salem, Hosur, Malur and Jakkasandra Industrial Estate. The tankers are
engaged through our dedicated transporters who employ trained & driving License certified
drivers. Tankers are checked by well established check list before loading at Tuticorin and
unloading at bottling plant. All the tankers are fitted with Vehicle Tracking System which will
monitor night driving, over speeding etc. Regular periodical training is given to our drivers to
handle normal operations as well as emergency situations.
Finished Goods:
The filled cylinders will be transported through 3/4/6 MT commercial vehicles which are
designed to carry LPG cylinders. These vehicles are engaged through dedicated transporters
and drivers are well trained to handle cylinders even during emergency.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 107
Table 4-1 Summary of findings
Impact Description Summary of findings Mitigation measures
Biophysical Environment
Geology Permanent disturbance to the
geology of the site during
construction.
Although permanent
disturbance to the geology on
site will occur, the proposed
development would be of
minimal impact as all
disturbances on site will be
limited to the construction
areas.
Topography Permanent disturbance to the
topography will occur. No water
bodies and no hilly places in the site
and surroundings.
Although the site under
KIADB industrial site,
appropriate mitigation
measures will be
implemented to minimize the
impact.
Soil, Land Use and
Capability
No agricultural activity has been
carried out and it’s a barren land
with shrubs. Site under KIADB
industrial area
Vegetation No major vegetation seen in the area.
Shrubs and barren land are identified
in the area
Appropriate mitigation
measures will be
implemented to minimize any
impacts that do take place in
the vicinity of these areas.
Water bodies No water bodies are seen in the site
and the surroundings.
Implementation of a
comprehensive and effective
storm water management
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 108
Impact Description Summary of findings Mitigation measures
plan with particular focus on
erosion and silt management
is a necessity in order to
protect the water bodies
Surface Water and
Groundwater
No perennial and seasonal rivers are
available in the nearby surroundings.
Water requirement of the proposed
project will be met through KIADB
water supply. No ground water
abstraction is envisaged.
No unauthorized extraction
of water from boreholes or
the creation of new boreholes
will be allowed on site. The
establishment of a storm
water management system
will ensure that all surface
water runoff from the site is
appropriately directed to the
natural wetland on site.
In terms of water
consumption limit
consumption by installing
water saving taps and duel
flushing toilet systems. Water
consumption can be reduced
by collecting and utilizing
rain water for gardening
purposes.
Air Quality and Noise Air quality and Noise will be having
minimal impact by means of
transport of vehicles and
machineries used during
construction.
Although the proposed project is a
The release of dust into the
atmosphere during
construction activities was
identified has been
adequately addressed in
terms of the mitigation
measures that would have to
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 109
Impact Description Summary of findings Mitigation measures
bottling plant and hence no air
pollution will be occurred by its
process during operation. Emissions
from the transport of vehicles and
DG set have minimal impact during
operation.
be implemented.
During construction
activities, noise will be
generated by vehicles,
equipment and building
activities, will be mitigated by
implementing proper EMP.
Visual Aspects At present the site is a barren land
without any development is seen in
the site as well as surroundings.
The design of the
development will be line with
the aesthetics of the
surrounding environment.
Urban Design and building
guidelines will be provided
for industrial development.
Waste Generation There will be no generation of
industrial solid wastes during the
bottling process. Municipal solid
waste generation will be occurred in
minimal quantity.
Domestic sewage will be the
generated during operation.
Designated solid waste
storage area will be allocated
within the site.
Agreement will be made with
TSDF for safe disposal of
hazardous wastes
Damaged cylinders will be
segregated and stored on site
prior to disposal as scrap
metal.
Domestic sewage will be
disposed through septic tanks
and soak pits.
Waste water generated from
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 110
Impact Description Summary of findings Mitigation measures
cylinder washings will be
diverted to sedimentation
traps and the clarified water
will be reused for green belt
development. Spent wash
from the caustic wash,
dissolved VOC, paint booth
wash will be treated in
effluent treatment plant
before discharge.
Odour Odour from ETP and Solid waste
stoage area will be occurred.
During operation, If any leakage
occurs in the bottling plant, odour of
LPG is to be identified.
Odour from solid waste area
Soak pit, dispersion trech and
ETP will be minimized by
ensuring that are properly
maintained a regular basis.
Leakages and incidents There is the potential for leakages,
incidents, fires and explosions due to
the operation activities.
Procedures and specific
mitigation measures would
need to be drawn up to
minimize and/or eliminate
the possibility of
contaminating the soil,
surface and groundwater
environments and ensure the
protection of the employees
working on site.
Socio-Economic Environment
Employment Providing employment to the skilled
and semi-skilled people in the
----
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 111
Impact Description Summary of findings Mitigation measures
surrounding villages
Population Changes There should be minimum changes
to the population dynamics of the
area
It is recommended that all
labour for the project to be
sourced locally.
Traffic Due to construction and operation
activities there is the possibility of
minimal disruptions to traffic flow in
the area.
With the establishment of the
development there will be
increased pressure on the
existing road network. To
alleviate the pressure, the
road network improvements
outlined in the Traffic
Assessment should be carried
out.
Safety Proposed project is the bottling plant
of LPG and there is a possibility of
Risk during operation of plant.
Adequate measures are
implemented and ensure the
safety of employees and the
surroundings.
Housing The project site falls under KIADB
industrial area and no housing is
planned.
-----
Energy Consumption With the consumption of
energy it has been
recommended that renewable
and or alternative energy
sources (where possible and
practical and sustainable) be
outlined in the conditions of
establishment and
encouraged to be utilized by
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 112
Impact Description Summary of findings Mitigation measures
the contractors
Planning and
Sustainable
Development
Framework for sustainability will
have been provided which will
enable the creation of a sustainable
development.
---
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 113
Table 4-2 Impact and Mitigation measures during Construction Phase
Description Impacts Mitigation measures
Land
Environment
Improper disposal of
construction wastes
It is suggested that the construction waste containing
sand, brick, gravel, cement etc. shall be used for
filling or PCC for construction of internal road or
project structures.
Air
Environment
Release of construction
materials and dust as
fugitive emission into the
environment from the
construction site/materials
can spoil the surrounding air
quality
To reduce the dust generation on site wherever &
whenever required water shall be sprinkled on
ground or stock pile of excavated soil.
Water
Environment
Impacts may occur due to the
accumulation of the
contaminant in water
resources
Construction material shall stored at adequate
distance from the water storage in order to prevent
any chances of accidental leakage or spillage which
could pollute the water storage
Noise
Environment
Transportation of
construction materials to the
site and machineries used will
generate Noise pollution
during Construction activities.
The machineries /equipment used on site shall be of
highly maintained so they do work with optimum
efficiency generating less noise pollution. Operation
of machineries/equipment causing high noise level
shall be stopped during the night time and all such
operations shall be planned for day time only.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 114
Table 4-3 Impact and Mitigation measures during Operation Phase
Description Impacts Mitigation measures
Land
Environment
Solid waste generated
from the project will be
stored in a separate place
provided in the site
Solid waste will be discarded as Biodegradable and non-
biodegradable waste to corporation/municipal sites and
authorized dealers respectively
Air
Environment
Emission of PM, SOx &
NOx from stacks attached
to DG is the only source
of air pollution.
DG set with adequate stack and acoustic enclosures
which used as backup during power cut.
Water
Environment
The proposed project will
generate 0.85 KLD of
wastewater from
domestic purposes and
6KLD of wastewater from
industrial processes.
Domestic sewage will be disposed through septic
tanks and soak pits. Waste water generated from
cylinder washings will be diverted to sedimentation
traps and the clarified water will be reused for
green belt development. Spent wash from the
caustic wash, dissolved VOC, paint booth wash will
be treated in effluent treatment plant before
discharge.
Noise
Environment
Major source of noise is
DG and machineries in
the processing unit
All equipments in the plant is designed/operated to
have a noise level not exceeding 85 to 90 dB(A) as per
the requirement of Occupational Health and Safety
Administration Standard (OHSAS).the noise generating
equipment would be in closed structures, the noise
transmitted outside would be still lower.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 115
5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
This chapter represents a comparative analysis of various alternatives that have been taken into
account to avoid or reduce impacts that would be unavoidable.
5.1 Selection of Site
The site for the proposed project is determined based on the following factors
Location
Proximity to sources of supply of raw materials
Proximity to waster source
Proximity to power source
Availability of land for the development of green belt
Road connectivity
The proposed LPG storage terminal unit will be set up at Jakkasandra industrial area (KIADB
industrial area). Product will be transported by road. Water will be sourced from KIADB water
supply. Power required will be sourced from BESCOM. 33% of the total plot area will be
allocated for green belt development. Dedicated solid waste storage area has been earmarked
within the site. Agreement will be made with TSDF for safe disposal of hazardous waste.
Adequate land is made available for setting up an effluent treatment plant for treating the
effluent generated from the paint booth, prior to discharging it.
So no alternative of site is considered for the proposed project
5.2 Selection of Technology
No alternative technology will be adapted for this proposed project
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 116
6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLANEnvironmental Management Plan (EMP) is the key to ensure a safe and clean environment.
The EMP envisages the plans for the proper implementation of mitigation measures to
reduce the adverse impacts arising out of the project activities.
EMP has been prepared addressing the issues like:
Mitigation measures for abatement of the undesirable impacts caused during the
construction and operation stage.
Details of management plans (Greenbelt development plan, Solid waste management
plan etc.).
Institutional set up identified & recommended for implementation of the EMP.
Post project environmental monitoring programme to be undertaken after
commissioning of the project.
Expenditures for environmental protection measures.
The environmental mitigation measures for construction and operation phases have been
given below:
6.1 Environmental Management Plan during Construction Phase
Environmental impacts during the construction phase can be attributed to the site
preparation activity and the mobilization of workforce. The impacts of the construction
phase on the environment would be basically of transient nature and are expected to wear
out gradually on completion of the construction programme. However, once the
construction of the project is completed and its operations started, these operation stage
impacts would overlap the impacts due to the construction activities.
In order to mitigate such impacts and restrict them within tolerable levels, the following
measures shall be adopted:
a.Proper and prior planning of approach and access roads, and appropriate
sequencing and scheduling of all major construction activities.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 117
b. Adoption of appropriate soil conservation programme and its timely
implementation in the proposed project site.
c.Initiation of an appropriate landscape programme including plantation of trees
and flowering plants in and around the project site particularly, at all
available spaces which would serve the dual purpose of controlling fugitive
dust and abatement of noise levels in addition to improving the aesthetics of
the area.
d. Water sprinkling in the vulnerable areas to suppress the dust generated
during excavation, levelling and other operations.
e.Use of properly tuned construction machinery & vehicles in good working
condition with low noise & emission and engines turned off when not in use.
f. Control of quality of construction wastewater within the construction site
through suitable drainage system with traps for arresting the sediment load
for its proposed disposal into the main natural drainage system around the
site.
g.Implementation of suitable disposal methods of sediment/ construction debris at
designated places to avoid water logging at construction site.
h. Provision of protective gears such as ear mufflers etc. for construction
personnel exposed to high noise levels and locating the temporary labour
sheds for housing the construction labourers away from the construction site.
6.2 Environmental Management Plan during Operation Phase
The following mitigation measures shall be adopted during the operation phase of the
project so as to minimize the impact:
The control measures that will be undertaken during the operation phase to mitigate the
impacts that may be caused during the operation of the project are as follows:
Periodic monitoring of the environmental attributes to check the adequacy and effectiveness
of the pollution control measures employed
The only point source of emission is D.G sets which will be fitted with stacks of
adequate height to disperse the pollutants. Non-point sources will be the bullet trucks
and vendor trucks. Adequate green belt has been developed to mitigate the pollution
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 118
arising due to movement of vehicles. Regular monitoring of DG-Stack and Ambient air
quality will be carried out.
Appropriate treatment of liquid effluents generated at the site-Domestic wastewater
will be treated in septic tanks and soak pits. The waste water from cylinder washings
and test bath unit is treated in sedimentation tanks and the waste water generated from
the paint booth is subjected to Effluent treatment plant for treatment.
Noise pollution will be curbed by using proper acoustic enclosures for D.G sets; thereby
the ambient noise levels will be maintained below the CPCB limits of 75 dB for
industrial areas. Personal protective equipments will be provided to those workers who
work in areas of high noise.
Rainwater harvesting system has been designed to utilize the underground water
system sustainably.
Proper maintenance of greenbelt will be ensured.
Adequate safety measures conforming to the occupational health and safety policy will
be taken to prevent accidents/hazards to the workers.
Appropriate fire fighting systems will be installed at the site.
6.3 Post project Environmental monitoring
It is imperative that the Project Authorities set up regular monitoring stations to assess the
quality of the neighbouring environment after the commissioning of the project. An
environmental monitoring programme is important as it provides useful information and
helps to:
Verify the predictions on environmental impacts presented in this study assist in detecting
the development of any unwanted environmental situation, and thus, provides opportunities
for adopting appropriate control measures, and identify the effectiveness of mitigative
measures suggested in the EMP.
6.3.1 Environmental Monitoring Programme
After commissioning of the project, post project monitoring of environmental parameters will
be carried out at regular intervals. The monitoring programme in different areas of the
environment has been based on the findings of the impact assessment studies. The post project
monitoring programme including areas, number and location of monitoring stations,
frequency of sampling and parameters to be covered is summarized in Table 6-1.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 119
Table 6-1Environmental Monitoring Programme
S.
No
Area of
Monitoring
Number of
Sampling Stations
Frequently of
Sampling
Parameters to be Analyzed
1. Meteorology One Hourly and
Daily basis.
Wind speed and direction,
Temperature, Relative Humidity,
Atmospheric pressure, Rainfall.
2. Ambient Air
Quality
2 Stations Once a month
:24 hourly
period
PM10, PM2.5, SO2 and NO2
3. Noise 4 (two within plant
premises and two
outside plant
premises)
Once every
season
Ambient Equivalent continuous
Sound Pressure Levels (Leq) at
day and Night time.
4. Exhaust from
DG set
Stack of DG set Quarterly PM10, PM2.5, SO2& CO
5. Vehicular
Emissions
Parking area Periodic
monitoring of
vehicles
Air emission and noise, PCU
6. Soil Two Locations
within the Project
Site
Yearly Once Physicochemical properties,
Nutrients, Heavy metals
7. Terrestrial
Ecology
Within 10km,
around the project
Once in three
years
Symptoms of injuries on plants
6.4 Greenbelt Development Plan
The green belt has been recommended as one of the major components of the EMP which
will further enhance the environmental quality through:
1. Mitigation of air pollution problems
2. Attenuation of noise level
3. Maintaining the Bio-diversity of the area and improve aesthetics.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 120
Therefore, development of green belt is nowadays imperative around industrial complexes.
Adequate plantation programme in and around the project site have been planned.
6.4.1 Development of green belt will include:
1) Plantation along the boundary / periphery and all over the project site for protection
against particulate dispersion and noise dispersion. The peripheral greenbelt will vary in
width to suit the plant design requirement.
2) Plantation along approach road and pathways for protection against noise and vehicular
emissions.
The following general guidelines and measures will be adopted:
The plantation of trees will be initiated with start of the construction stage so that
substantial growth may be achieved when the project is completed. The greenbelt
development programme will be drawn to conform to natural climatic conditions and
adaptability of the species.
Species involved in plantation / afforestation should be indigenous, fast growing and eco-
friendly.
Proper drainage system and proper plantation techniques should be adopted.
Plantation should be properly maintained and protected by fencing from grazing and
felling. The plantations would consist of a mixture of carefully chosen locally available
species of trees, shrubs and herbs, preferably evergreen and resistant to pollution.
Endemic and endangered species varieties will be planted in the green belt of the site
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 121
Figure 6-1 Green Belt Layout of the Site
Total Green Belt Area 7804.27 Sq.m (33.2%)
6.5 Occupational Health and Safety Program
M/s SHV Energy Pvt Ltd. aims at fostering a safe and healthy work environment to its
employees.
The main objectives will be
i) Maintenance and promotion of workers’ health and working capacity
ii) Improvement of working environment and work to become conducive to safety and
health
4520.40Sq.m
1453.71Sq.m
745.
99Sq
.m
849.94Sq.m
94.65Sq.m
149.25
Sq.m
761.16Sq.m1263.70
Sq.m59.90S
q.m
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 122
iii) Development of work culture in a direction which will support health and safety at
work and thereby promoting positive social climate for smooth operation that will
enhance productivity
During Construction Phase:
The activities undertaken during the pre-operation phase may pose occupational safety and
health issues. Hence the following measures will be employed:
Personal Protective equipments will be provided to the workers
Hospital facility shall be facilitated to address the emergencies that may arise
Personnel will be trained about fire fighting systems and first aid
Regular monitoring of occupational health
During Operation Phase
General Functions of the safety committee:
Conduct routine workplace inspections
Provide Personal Protective Equipment
Develop and implement safe work procedures and rules
Provide on-going safety training
Enforce safety rules and appropriate discipline
Promote safety awareness and reduce the potential for injury/loss
Identifying workplace hazards
Enforcement of safety rules
Measuring safety performance
Reducing frequency/severity of injuries
Specific Functions of the safety committee:
a) Occupational Health Centre will be established inside the plant premises and medical
examiners trained under occupational health will be engaged for periodic medical
inspection of all the employees
b) Required PPE’s will be provided to all the employees
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 123
c) Periodical training programs will be conducted to motivate the employees, contract
workers, drivers and rewarded as per SHV Safety Management Plan 2016
d) National safety weeks will be celebrated to create and sustain safety awareness among
the employees
A fund of Rs. 5 Lakhs will be allocated per annum for the above mentioned activities.
6.6 Environmental safety Policy of SHV Energy Pvt. Ltd
M/s SHV Energy Pvt Ltd. has well established standard operating procedure for safety and
health which covers elaborately for environment also. Our environment policy stipulates the
following:
6.6.1 Environment Management Cell
For the effective implementation of the mitigation measures and consistent functioning of the
proposed project, an Environmental Management System has been proposed. The EMS will
include the following:
Environmental Management Cell
Environmental Monitoring Program
Personnel Training
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 124
Regular Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plan
Documentation-Standard Operating procedures of Environmental Management
6.6.2 Hierarchical system/administrative order of SHV for Environmental
management
An organizational set up will be formulated to ensure the effective implementation measures
and to conduct environmental monitoring.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 125
Table 6-2Hierarchical system for Environmental Management
Central Safety Committee1. Chairman2. Secretary (Corporate SafetyCoordinator)3. Members (Business Heads)
Regional Safety Commitee(North)
1. Chairman (Business Head)2. Secretary (Regional SafetyCoordinator)3. Members (Department/Functional Heads)
Locational Safety Commitee1. Chairman (Plant manager)2. Secretary (Safety Officer)3. Members (Operations Head,Logistics In-Charge, MaintenanceDept Head, Transporterrepresentative, Fireman,Security)
Regional Safety Commitee(West)
1. Chairman (Business Head)2. Secretary (Regional SafetyCoordinator)3. Members (Department/Functional Heads)
Regional Safety Commitee (East)1. Chairman (Business Head)2. Secretary (Regional SafetyCoordinator)3. Members (Department/Functional Heads)
Regional Safety Commitee(South)
1. Chairman (Business Head)2. Secretary (Regional SafetyCoordinator)3. Members (Department/Functional Heads)
Locational Safety Commitee1. Chairman (Plant manager)2. Secretary (Safety Officer)3. Members (Operations Head,Logistics In-Charge, MaintenanceDept Head, Transporterrepresentative, Fireman,Security)
Locational Safety Commitee1. Chairman (Plant manager)2. Secretary (Safety Officer)3. Members (Operations Head,Logistics In-Charge, MaintenanceDept Head, Transporterrepresentative, Fireman,Security)
Locational Safety Commitee1. Chairman (Plant manager)2. Secretary (Safety Officer)3. Members (Operations Head,Logistics In-Charge, MaintenanceDept Head, Transporterrepresentative, Fireman,Security)
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 126
The major roles and responsibilities of Environmental Management Cell will be as follows:
To implement the environmental management plan
To ensure regular operation and maintenance of pollution control devices
To assure regulatory compliance with all relevant rules and regulations
To minimize environmental impacts of operations by strict adherence to the EMP
To initiate environmental monitoring as per approved schedule
Review and interpretation of monitored results and corrective measures in case
monitored results are above the specified limit
Maintain documentation of good environmental practices and applicable
environmental laws
Maintain environmental related records
Coordination with regulatory agencies, external consultants and monitoring
laboratories
6.6.3 Cost Estimate for Environment Management Plan
It is estimated that the total capital cost for implementing the environmental management plan
is Rs.2,60,000, while the recurring costs for the same is Rs. 3,80,000. The cost estimate is
presented in the table.
Table 6-3Cost Estimate for EMP
Capital Cost
S.No Description Cost (Rs)
1 Plantation of 300 trees (150 trees per acre in green belt area with proper
interspaced)
3,00,000/-
2 Construction of collection pits of Pollutant to be treated at common
effluent treatment plant (20 KL tank)
3,00,000/-
Recurring Cost
1 Tree watering and manuring 1,50,000/-
2 Treatment of Effluent at common effluent treatment plant (10 KL/month) 1,80,000/-
3 Yearly Air monitoring as per PCB norms 50,000/-
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 127
6.7 Corporate Social Responsibility
Super Gas Foundation a Registered Charitable Trust, formed with a primary objective of
promoting education to the poor and under-privileged children in India, with other objectives
of reaching out to communities in and around where we operate. Super Gas Foundation is a
philanthropic arm of SHV Energy India Pvt., Ltd., and has been set up to fulfill the Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR) activities of SHV Energy India Pvt., Ltd., SHV Energy India is
engaged in the integrated Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) business including import, storage,
filling, sales, distribution of LPG in bulk and in cylinders of various capacities and also in the
Auto LPG business and provision of associated services, in India, under the brand name ‗Super
Gas‘.
EDUCATION:
Preventing child labour
Bridge schooling and vocational training
Providing infrastructure in schools
Developing teachers capability
Developing children holistically
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 128
Improving the quality of life of children in the villages
HEALTH:
Health check-up & Medical support
Blood donation
Infrastructure to homes of HIV, Deaf & dumb, Autism, Blind etc.,
HYGIENE:
Toilet constructions and running water facilities in schools
Potable water
Personal Hygiene sessions and providing monthly personal care items
Swachch Bharat
NATURAL CALAMITY RELIEF:
Direct relief to victims
Partnering with NGO‘s
Collaboration with State and Central Governments
Prime Minister‘s National Relief Fund
Chief Minister Relief Fund
WATER and VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT:
Water storage facilities in Village
Rural Development
JOY of GIVING
As per Schedule VII under CSR Rules in New Companies Act‘2013, CSR activities can
be done either in the form of Projects/Programs as listed below:
Activities relating to:—
We have selected project/program by its name contributed by our SHV colleagues as follows:
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 134
Education:
Preventing child labour
Bridge schooling and vocational training
Providing infrastructure in schools
Developing teachers capability
Developing children holistically
Improving the quality of life of children in the villages
Constructed CHORD School in 2006
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 135
Swatch Bharat – painted primary school and provided running water facilities to thetoilets, Choutuppal
Female Personal Hygiene session to ZP School, CHORD and St. Joseph‘s school children and
monthly personal care items to them once in every two months
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 136
Health Check-up and medicalsupport
Cancer awareness andscreening camp
‘Hepatitis B’ – screeningcamp
Planting saplings on ‘WorldEnvironmental Day’
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 139
6.8 Project Schedule
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 140
7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1 Disaster Management Plan
An onsite emergency plan is attributed to the response plan that contains and minimizes the
effects due to emergencies within the installations which have a potential to cause damage to
people and facilities within the installation premises.
The On-site emergency Plan is attached as Annexure-VIII.
7.2 Risk Assessment
The complete risk assessment study report for the proposed project is enclosed as Annexure-
VIII.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 141
8 PROJECT BENEFITS
This project in a true and large way will complement the domestic and commercial in terms of
storage & handling of raw materials, finished products and fuel requirements.
LPG is a lower-carbon fuel with more than 2000 applications. It is cleaner than
other fossil fuels, highly energy efficient, good value and available everywhere.
LPG is safe and actively helps contribute to mitigation of climate change. It
contributes to the development of a sustainable energy model that can help us meet
our environmental objectives as a society.
LPG is usually the fuel of choice for domestic, commercial, industrial and
automotive use. With ever increasing emphasis on product quality and fuel
efficiency, LPG is fast becoming the No.1 energy choice of industrial customers.
LPG being safe, environment friendly, convenient, accessible and portable it is
being used in various sectors like Engineering & Fabrication, Aerosol Industry,
Hotels & Restaurants, Ceramic Industry, Glass Industry, Agriculture Industry,
Textile Industry, Paper Industry, Plastic Industry and Chemical Industry.
Improves the quality of life of by overcoming the health implications arising due
to the use biomass fuel like wood, dung and crop residues.
This project will boost the port and terminal activities.
Warehousing investment will give an opportunity for storage and various
international logistics activity to offer more competitive range of products.
This project will bridge the LPG demand and supply gap in Kolar District and
adjoining districts like Tumkur, Mangalore, Bellary, Mysore etc.
Project will generate employment for both skilled and non-skilled manpower.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 142
9 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
SHV Energy proposes it new plant at Jakkasandra village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. The
proposed unit is LPG bottling plant of 21000 MTPA. LPG will be coming to the unit by road in
trucks. This will be stored in bullets and filled in cylinders of various capacities. LPG is also
sold as bulk LPG to Industrial units and to be used as fuel for Auto LPG segment. The proposal
is only storage and bottling of LPG.
The project site is located at notified Jakkasandra Industrial Area proposed by KIADB. The site
is well connected by road to NH 4 (Bangalore – Tripathi). Volvo Unit is located within 6.5 Km
from site and Honda is 1.5 Km from site
The total land area of the project site is 23507.00 Sq.M. The nearest human settlement from
the site is Jakkasandravillage located at a distance of 0.9 Km in the south-west direction. The
site is located approximately 6 Km from the Bangalore-Chennai National Higway-4. The
nearest railway station is Maur railway station at a distance of 10.55 Km in the south
direction. There are no National Parks, Sanctuaries and an ecologically sensitive area within
the impact area of 10 Km. The total investment on the project is22 Crores.
The total fresh water requisite for the proposed plant is 10 KLD, which is sourced through
KIADB water supply. Domestic sewage will be disposed through Septic tank and Soak pit.
Effluent generated from the industry will be disposed through CETP at KIADB industrial Estate,
Malur. Overflow from sedimentation tank will be channelized towards green belt development
The Total power requirement for the installation is 322 KVA which will be provided by
BESCOM. D.G. sets of capacity 320 KVA (2nos) + 62.5 KVA (1 no) will serve as the backup
facilities of power supply in case of emergencies during power failure.The total manpower
required will be 14 persons on direct basis and 50 persons on indirect basis.
Rain water harvesting tanks are engineered and strategically located to recharge and maintain
the underground water table. Recharge pits (locations) have been set up at the site to harvest
run-off water.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 143
The hottest months during the year are March to May, the coolest month is December for
which the max and min temp are shown in the data collected from IMD Data recorded as
monthly means of maximum and minimum values recorded at 08:30 hrs and17:30hrs.
Peak season of rainfall in Malur is during September – October. Annual average rainfall is 760
mm and the region receives rainfall both during the southwest monsoon from June to
September and again from October to November. Data recorded as monthly means of
maximum and minimum values recorded at 08:30hrs and 17:30 hrs and the winds are
generally moderate. In the southwest monsoon months the winds blow from southwest or
westerly direction and the reset of the year it is mainly from northeast and southeast
The existing baseline levels of Particulate matter (PM2.5), Particulate matter (PM10), Sulfur
dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO (µg/m3), Pb (µg/m3), O3, NH3, Benzene, Benzo (a)
pyrene, As and Ni at 8 locations of monitoring were found to be within the permissible limits
during the monitoring period from September to December.
The field observations during the study period indicated that the ambient noise levels in the
study area were well within the prescribed standards at all the different noise zones prescribed
by CPCB.
The analysis of ground water results indicate that the average pH ranges in between 7.2-7.9,
TDS ranges from 118-1030 mg/l, Total hardness ranges from 50-530 mg/l, Iron content
ranges from 0.14-0.29 mg/l, nitrate content ranges from 0.2-32.3 mg/l.The analysis of
ground water results indicate that the average pH ranges in between 6.9-7.3, TDS ranges from
80-326 mg/l, Total hardness ranges from 23-125 mg/l, and DO ranges from 4.5-6.2 mg/l.
The analysis of Soil is observed that the pH of the soil samples ranged from 7.25-8.52
indicating that the soils are alkaline in nature. Conductivity of the soil samples ranged from to
36-248 μS/cm. As the EC value is less than 2000 μS/cm, the soil is found to be non-saline in
nature. The water holding capacity of the soil samples varied from 31-44 (%). Nitrogen as N
value varies from 0.06-0.23 %. Potassium content ranges from 0.15-0.31%. Phosphorous from
0.05-0.18%
Kolar district is located in the southern region of the State and is the eastern-most district of the
Karnataka State. The district is bounded by the Bangalore Rural district in the west
Chikballapur district in the north, Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh in the east and on the
south by Krishnagiri and Vellore district of Tamil Nadu. The total area is3979 sq. km.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 144
Kolar district has one sub division and five taluks. Kolar sub - division comprises of Kolar,
Bangarpet, Malur, Srinivaspura&Mulbagal. The village Jakkasandra comes under Abbenahalli
village Panchayat of Malur taluk of Kolar district. The area of the village is 370.89 Ha. As per
2011 Census, the number of households in the village was 95, the population of the village
was 469 which consist of 252 (53.73%) male and 217(46.26%) female. The size of the family
is 4.94.
Though the major part of the land is being used as agricultural land (278.94 Ha), the majority
of workers employed in non-agriculture activities. It is due to the industrialization in nearby
areas and proximity to Malur town and Bangalore City. As per 2011 Census data, only 15% of
workers are in agriculture and related activities. The main source of irrigation is tube wells.
Ragi and horticultural crops are the main crops of the area. There is no forest land in the
village.
LPG will be transported through trucks from Tuticorin port via roadways to the bottling plant.
No emissions occur during the operations as the entire bottling process is carried out through
pipelines from storage area to filling shed. The only point source of emission is D.G sets which
are fitted with stacks of adequate height to disperse the pollutants.
M/s SHV Energy Pvt Ltd. has well established standard operating procedure for safety and
health which covers elaborately for environment also. For the effective implementation of the
mitigation measures and consistent functioning of the proposed project, an Environmental
Management System has been proposed. It is estimated that the total capital cost for
implementing the environmental management plan is Rs.2,60,000, while the recurring costs
for the same is Rs. 3,80,000.
This project in a true and large way will complement the domestic and commercial in terms
of storage & handling of raw materials, finished products and fuel requirements.
With the above benefits, and the environmental and societal commitment and readiness of the
project, the environmental impact assessment report strongly affirms and recommends the
proposed project.
EIA for proposed LPG Bottling Unit
Consultant: Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd. Page 145
10 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTSDetails of the consultancy and consultant engaged are as follows:
Table 10-1Details of the Consultant
Consultant Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
NABET Certificate No NABET/ EIA/ 1013/ 041
National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories (NABL)
accreditation for Laboratory services for ISO17025
MoEF&CC Recognized Laboratory
ISO 9001:2008 qualified and certification by URS
Environmental Management System complying AS/NZS ISO 14001:2004
Occupational Health & Safety Management System OHSAS 18001:2007
Approved by Karnataka PCB and Kerala PCB.
Achilles joint qualification system. Achilles Id.15148
Kiwa Quality Management System