Date post: | 13-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | thomas-todd |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
PSC and ERCP
Paul R. Tarnasky, M.D.
Methodist Digestive Institute
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
PSC: Objectives
• Background
• Diagnostic options
• Treatment (Endoscopic)
• Endotherapy Complications
• Tissue Sampling
Challenging
Benign Biliary Strictures
• Postoperative stricture (OLT, biliary-enteric)
• Operative bile duct injury
• Chronic pancreatitis
• Papillary stenosis
• Radiation injury
• Traumatic injury
• Sclerosing cholangitis
Terminology• Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis
– Idiopathic but likely immune mediated
• Small-duct Sclerosing Cholangitis– Histologic diagnosis
• Overlap Syndromes – PSC features plus– Autoimmune hepatitis or Pancreatitis
• Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis– Obstruction, Infection, Ischemia, Toxin,
Histiocytosis X, IgG4 Cholangitis
• May progress to large-duct PSC
• Better long-term prognosis, longer transplant-free survival
• May recur after liver transplant
• Cholangiocarcinoma is less common unless progression to large-duct PSC
Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:56-63
IgG4 cholangitis and AIP-SC overlap syndrome respond to steroids
Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis• Chronic cholestatic liver disease - Idiopathic
– Mean age at diagnosis =40yrs, ≈75% Male– Fatigue, jaundice, pruritus or no symptoms– +ANA (≈30%), +ASMA (≈60%) +ANCA (≈80%)
• Clinical diagnosis + cholangiopathy• Decreased survival
– Median survival after diagnosis ≈ 12 years– 10 year survival ≈70%, 20 year survival ≈65%
• Potential sequelae– Cholangitis, Biliary cirrhosis, Malignancy
Best Pract & Research Clin Gastroenterol 25:741-752, 2011
>50% (up to 80%) have IBD (usually UC)
– 5% of IBD (colon disease) have PSC
– Independent of disease activity
•10X risk for colon cancer (>10% lifetime)
– Screening colon exam yearly at dx of PSC risk for GB CA and HCC (2-5% lifetime)
– annual U/S, CCX if lesion/polyp independent of size OR > 8mm
PSC, IBD and Malignancy
PSC and Cholangiocarcinoma
• Risk of 1.5% per year after dx of PSC
• 30% of CCA dx within 2 years of PSC dx
• Nearly >150X risk for CCA c/t general
• ≈ 20% lifetime risk for CCA
• Screening strategy not defined– CA 19-9 (>130 U/ml)
≈ 70% sensitivity, 98% specificity– Annual imaging
Cholangiography in PSC
• Stenosis alternating with dilation- “beaded”
• Diffuse intra- and extra-hepatic
• 25% Intra-hepatic only
• 5% Extra-hepatic only
• 5-15% Histologic only (Small-duct PSC)
• “Dominant Stricture” eventually in 20-50% – diameter < 1mm for CHD, < 1.5mm for CBD
• ? Concomitant cancer if long stricture
Liver Biopsy for PSC ?
• Not required if cholangiogram is abnormal
• Required to diagnose small-duct PSC– 25% progress to large-duct PSC
• Consider if transaminases and suspected PSC-AIH overlap syndrome
Diagnosis of PSC
Chapman et al. Hepatology 2010
Jaundice
ERC
• MRCP had high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PSC (> 80% for both)
• MRCP may avoid risks of ERCP
• Possible false + MRCP in cirrhosis
• Possible false - MRCP in “early PSC”
Radiology 2010;256:387-396
MRCP Pitfall (Cirrhosis)
ERC-Cholangiography Technique
• Avoid pancreatography
• Consider wire-guided cannulation
• Sphincterotomy
• Early radiographs with minimal contrast
• Adjust scope position to visualize duct
Diagnosis of PSC: Summary
• Suspect if AMA-negative cholestasis
• Ultrasound to rule-out obstruction
• MRCP helpful (if not cirrhotic)
• Check IgG4 (IgG4-associated cholangitis)
• ANCA supportive (suspect colon disease)
• ANA +/- liver biopsy if transaminases
• ERCP: to confirm diagnosis, jaundice, e/o dominant stricture or increased CA19-9
Medical Management of PSC
• Screen for malignancy
• Immunizations for viral hepatitis
• Screen for osteopenia q 3 years
• Screen for varices (if e/o cirrhosis)
• Monitor for fat soluble vitamin deficiency
• Management of pruritus (similar to PBC)
• Refer for OLT (≈25% recurrence in 10 yrs)– Refractory cholangitis and/or ESLD
Therapy for Cholangitis in PSC• Antibiotic therapy
– Quinolone for 10-14 days– Prophylactic cyclical for recurrent cholangitis:
Quinolone and/or metronidazole for 2 weeks every 2 months
• UDCA is not recommended
• Surgical
• Percutaneous
• ERCP
Interventional Therapy for PSC
• ≈ 20 - 50% develop biliary obstruction
• Percutaneous therapy is effective, increased morbidity c/t endoscopic therapy, required if failed endoscopic therapy fails, more common with hilar obstruction
• Surgical therapy (bypass, resection or OLT) – No benefit & might worsen OLT outcomes– Consider for suspected cholangiocarcinoma or
if failed endoscopic or percutaneous therapy
Therapeutic ERCP Indications
Indications
•Spills
•Spasms
•Stones
•Strictures
• Endoscopic
• Retrieving
• Cutting
• Plumbing
• Biliary sphincterotomy
• Stricture dilation (dominant strictures)– Balloon dilation– Catheter dilation
• Stent placement (short term)
• Limited data suggest improved outcomes– Improved transplant-free survival– No randomized controlled trials
Therapeutic ERCP for PSC
Goal: Reduce alkaline phosphatase to < 1.5X UNL
Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:293-299
• 25 pts treated over 10 years
• Treated with stents +/- stricture dilation
• Stents removed or exchanged q 2-3 mo or if evidence of stent dysfunction
• Complicated by cholangitis in 10 (40%)
80% at 1yr
Cumulative proportion of patients without endoscopic intervention
60% at 3yr
(Mean 11 days)
Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2304-2307
Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:1059-1066
171 pts with up to 20 yr f/u
• 96 (56%) had endotherapy• Sphincterotomy• Balloon Dilation q 4 wk
until stricture resolved• Mean 5.2 dilations (1-17)• 6 (4%) developed CCA• 20 (12%) underwent OLT
Actuarial survival free of OLT
Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:527-534
Therapeutic ERCP for PSC
Clin Liver Dis 2010; 14:349-358
Therapeutic ERCP for PSC
• Biliary access (can be difficult)
• Balloon dilation preferred
• Short-term stent placement– Persistent stricture after dilation– Recent biliary sepsis
• Strictures >2cm proximal to CHD are ineffectively treated, ? Indicate need OLT
• Increased risk for post-ERCP pancreatitis
Balloon Dilation Alone
Balloon Dilation + Stenting
ERCP Complications in PSC
• Retrospective • Mayo Clinic• ERCPs in 2005• Overall 11%• Higher cholangitis
Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:855-860
Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:643-648
Cumulative complications per patient: PEP 4 (16%)
Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:293-299
J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:1032-1039
>50% complications are PEP 106 patients had ERCP11% PEP per patient
• Laboratory (LFT, CA 19-9, IgG4)• Routine imaging (US, CT)• MRCP, EUS• ERCP Sensitivity Specificity
– Brush cytology ~50% >95%– Intraductal biopsy ~60% >95%– Cholangioscopy ~80% ~80%– Probe CLE ? ?– Combined >80%
Suspicious Strictures
Gastrointest Endosc 2014;79:943-950
• 8 studies involving 828 patients with PSC
• Sensitivity = 68%
• Specificity = 70%
• High Cost
• Recommended if high pretest probability
Or if standard brush cytology is negative
Cholangioscopy & Biliary CLE
Intraductal Biopsies
Suspect Cholangiocarcinoma
• Mass on surveillance imaging
• Increased CA 19-9 (> 130 U/mL)– 80% sensitivity, 98% specificity
• Rapid recurrent cholestasis after endotherapy (< 12 weeks)
• Long-segment stricture
• Atypical cytology
Evaluation for Suspected CCA
Chapman et al. Hepatology 2010
? Laparotomy
q 6 – 12 weeks
New Method to Diagnose CCA?
Acrylonitrile, Methyl hexane, and Benzene
Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:943-949
Cholangiocarcinoma
Cholangiocarcinoma with PSC
• Long and/or early recurrent strictures• Poor prognosis: < 20% 3 yr survival even
after surgical resection• Consider OLT protocol (< 3cm mass)• Preoperative drainage is controversial• Frequently unresectable (>80%)• Confirmation of cancer is difficult (~50%)• Palliation is goal
– Stenting +/- Ablation
Palliative Stenting for Hilar CCA
• Define lesion to target drainage • Only 25-50% of liver needs drainage• Guidewire access of desired duct• Opacify only ducts that are to be drained• Single plastic stent preoperatively• Bilateral drainage for Type II (long-term)• Uncovered SEMS preferable (inoperable)• Percutaneous and/or Endoscopic
Bilateral Uncovered SEMS
Palliative Ablation of CCA
PSC Summary
• Varied clinical presentations
• Lack data
• Technically challenging
• Complications are common
• Limited treatment options
Not All Bad News