Date post: | 07-May-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | phiee-poerba |
View: | 519 times |
Download: | 1 times |
BY:NOVIYANTI
116030117011011
PUBLIC POLICY ANALYSIS“WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY
IN MALANG CITY”
List of Presentation
Background
Public Policy Analysis
Recommendation
… BACKGROUND …
Population GrowthDevelopment
Environmental Damage
Increasing the volume of waste
Waste Problem
MALANG1. The amount of waste is not
transported as much as 3240 cubic meters of the total waste volume (259,636 cubic meters).
2. Area of landfill Supiturang in Malang city is 25% of the 15 acres to accommodate the waste in the city of Malang.
3. The volume of waste in Malang is 400 tons / day.
Law 18 of 2008 on Waste Management
… Public Policy Analysis …
Public policy analysis used was based on the theory of public policy analysis, CV Patton & DS Sawicki (1986).1. Verify, define, detail the problems2. Establish evaluation criteria3. Identify alternative policies4. Evaluate alternative policies5. Display and select among alternative
policies6. Monitor policies outcomes
1. Verify, define, detail the problems
Waste Problem
Waste Management:Sanitary Landfill
Human Resources
Infrastructure
Community Empowerme
nt
Technology
The availability of the trash, trucks, wheelie bins
Public awareness to process / recycle waste
Waste recycling systems, process waste into electrical energy
The lack of a janitor and a cadre of environmental experts in the field
Cost Every ton of waste managed in need of funds Rp75,000 per day, while the volume of waste Malang city reach 400 tons per day.
Thus, the government needs funds Rp30 million per day for waste management
2. Establish evaluation criteria
Net benefit
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Cost
Administrative
3. Identify alternative policies
A. Sanitary LandfillSanitary Landfill is a high tech. Sanitary
landfills are equipped with a system that makes it easy to control waste, such as leachate (waste water is extracted from the waste) so it does not contaminate groundwater; soil cover or overburden and also processing the methane gas extracted out of the trash can be fired electricity.
B. Decentralized waste management, involving the private sector
In Kitakyushu (Japan), garbage collection performed by the government and the contractor. They even arranged the separation and collection of waste
In addition, waste management in Kitakyushu using Takakura basket. It aims to reduce the volume of waste and recycle garbage.
C. Waste management into electrical energy In Monterey (Meksiko), Simeprodeso institution,
successfully managing the waste until it can produce electricity to illuminate the third street lighting.
It takes 11 million dollars, and its profit is 2 million per year.
Incinerator is only consumes 20% of the electrical energy generated, and the remaining 80% sold. But before trash is separated by flammable or not, according to the trash can provided.
D. Garbage Bank
The concept of garbage bank is receiving the waste collected which will then be replaced in the form of money to the community in real terms. But society will receive a savings book containing the recorded amount of money, which later can be used for various purposes, for example: pay the garbage workers, pay his electricity, pay school fees (application of waste bank at school), and others.
4. Evaluate alternative policies
A. Sanitary Landfill
Net Benefit
• Increase the economic value of land.
• Ground water cleanliness can be maintained.
• utilization of electrical energy from methane gas.
Effectiveness
• This system is capable of solving the problem of waste management because it can meet the expectations and preserve the environment and ensure.
Efficiency
• This system is efficient because the facilities in a single system (sanitary landfill) can provide many benefits
Cost
• It needs to raise about Rp 100-200 million per ton. While operational cost is Rp 100-300 thousand per ton per day.
Administrative
• Waste management is not complicated, of any remaining processes not previously used again, it will be processed back to the other benefits.
B. Decentralized waste management, involving the private sector
Net Benefit
• It makes easy the task of the janitor, the separation of waste.
• It reduces waste from households
• It produces compost that can be used personally
• Waste that can be recycled
Effectiveness
• Alternative policy is not very effective, because it reduces the volume of waste at the household level.
Efficiency
• It involves the janitor and the community.
• The technology used is quite simple
Cost
• The government does not need a lot of money by working with the private sector.
Administrative
• There is a determination of the garbage collection day, which is done by the government.
C. Waste management into electrical energy
Net Benefit
• It relieve the government budget in the supply of electricity from the state electricity company.
Effectiveness
• It was not effective. Waste that can not be burned, can not be optimized for recycling.
Efficiency
• It requires sophisticated technology.
• This program does not involve the public and does not require much labor.
Cost
• It requires substantial funds
Administrative
• Administration required is simple enough to implement this policy.
D. Garbage Bank
Net Benefit
• Community gets money from the waste/trash
• Government does not bother to sort garbage from each household
Effectiveness
• This policy is not effective because it only solves the problem of waste that can be recycled.
Efficiency
• Alternative policy is quite efficient because it can empower / utilize existing resources.
Cost
• It does not require substantial funds
Administrative
• Government needs to disseminate to the society about the existence of the garbage bank so the policy will go smoothly.
5. Display and select among alternative policies
Alternative Policies DetailProblem
Sanitary landfill
Decentralized waste
management
Waste into electrical
energyGarbage Bank
Fund(High cost)
- √ - √
Infrastructure - - - -
Community Empowerment
√ √ - √
High Technology
- - - √
Good Quality of Human Resources
√ - √ √
6. Monitor policies outcomes
Modify the existing policy alternative.In practice, sanitary landfill is still quite
difficult to implement, given that the government needs substantial funds and sophisticated technology. Therefore, garbage bank policy should be applied while preparing for cooperation with foreign investors to realize a sanitary landfill. Combination sanitary landfills and garbage bank is an excellent combination of alternative and ideal to apply.
… Recommendation …
Improving internal sector
Improving the community empowerment
Build a network with the private sector