Quality of ECE programme and its impact on school readiness levels
on childrenResearch partners: ASER CentreNIPCCD GuwahatiAndhra Mahila Sabha
Supported by:
Overview of presentation
• Research questions• Design of the study• Methodology
Larger study
• Are ECE centres available for all 4 year olds?• What are the trends in participation of 4
year olds in ECE programmes? • How ready are the children for school?• What are the emerging models in ECE?
Results & findings
Research Questions1 What are the trends in availability of ECE programs and levels
of participation in ECE of 3 to 5 year olds?
2 To what extent are the 3 to 5 year olds ‘prepared’ for primary schooling, in terms of school readiness & personal social development?
3 To what extent are the school readiness levels associated with children’s ECE experience? Which elements of the ECE content and processes have greater impact on school readiness?
These Qs are being explored through a comprehensive 3 strand study
Design of the study: 3 strands, 3 states
Strand Objectives Sample
ASurvey methodTo derive district level estimates of(a) current trends in participation of 4-5 year olds (b) school readiness levels at 5 years
362 villages1616centers 13868 children
BQuasi-experimental & longitudinal(a) To study quality variations across ECE centers , public, private & voluntary(b) To identify significant quality variables in ECE that impact school readiness and primary school outcomes.
Sub-set of Strand A sample75 villages298 ECE centers2767 children
CQualitative Case StudyIn-depth case studies of innovative practices in ECE
9 case studies, across many states
Methodology Methodology
• Baseline of 3 ½ - 4 ½ year olds: school readiness levels, household survey and quality of ECE programme
Pre-test
• Tracking : Attendance & dosage of quality of ECE programme
Quarterly Tracking
• Impact assessment : Post-test of cohort on school readiness, after a year of ECE intervention
Post-test
• Quarterly tracking : Attendance & quality of classroom processes at 6, 7 and 8 years
• Medium term Impact Assessment : Annual age appropriate learning achievement & personal social behaviour assessment on completing ages 6 , 7 & 8
Follow up in primary school
Results and Findings
• Every village visited in the 3 states had an anganwadi centre confirming universalization of ICDS
• However, within villages, hamlet-wise distribution of AWCs is still inadequate, specially in Assam
• Private preschools are mushrooming all over rural areas particularly in sampled districts of AP and Rajasthan– 89% villages in Rajasthan had private preschools – In Andhra Pradesh 34% villages have the same– In Assam only 14% village had private preschools
Are ECE centres available for all 4 year olds?
• About 95% children enrolled in ECE in sampled districts of Assam & AP.
• In Rajasthan, only 2/3rd of sample is enrolled (Sept-Dec 2011)
• State wise difference in trends in participation in sampled districts– In Assam 85% attend anganwadi centres, – in AP 52% & in Rajasthan only 20% attend anganwadi centres– Private school participation extensive in AP (32%) and Rajasthan (40%)
within and outside villages– Small proportion of underage children also attend government primary
schools in AP and Rajasthan
Where are the 4 year olds?
Cognitive & Language skills:
• Pre number & number concepts• Sequential thinking • Classification
• Following instructions• Sentence formation • Phonetics
Adaptive Behaviour:
• Socialisation• Emotional Control• Self-help skills• Communication
How was school readiness assessed in 5 year olds?
How ready are the 5 year olds for school?
adaptive behaviour
cognitive & language
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Children not adequately ready for school in terms of cognitive and language skills but better equipped with social adaptive skills
Assam sample has an edge over the other 2 states
Impact of extent of ECE exposure on school readiness
Participation in ECE programme makes a difference!! •Extent of participation has significant impact on cognitive & language skills
• Positive impact on adaptive skills as well but less significant
Adaptive behaviour
Cognitive & Language
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
no exposure partial exposure 1 yr exposure
In what aspects of school readiness does ECE make a difference?
ECE participation has influence on all school readiness competencies
1 year participation : In cognitive, language and communication skills significant difference
socialization
emotional
communication
self-help
cognitive
language
cogn
itive
& la
ngau
ge
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
no participation partial participation one year participation
Rajasthan
Does age make a difference in school readiness levels?
cognition & language
adaptive behaviour
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
64-66 month 61-63 month 58-60 month 55-57 month
The age range for the sample children is 12 months (55 to 66 months)
• Older children are readier in school readiness as compared to younger indicating impact of maturity
Which ECE model is making more difference in SR in Andhra Pradesh?
• Children from innovative practices demonstrate better scores on adaptive behaviour skills
• Children attending private school are better equipped with cognitive & language skills ………………HH factors?
adaptive behaviour cognitive & language0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
anganwadi private school IKP balbadi govt school
Which ECE model is making more difference in SR in Assam?
adaptive behaviour cognitive&language0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
anganwadi private school ka-shareni
• Children from across models are scoring at par in adaptive behaviour skills
• Children attending Ka-shareni are scoring better in cognitive & language skills
Which ECE model is making more difference in SR in Rajasthan?
adaptive behaviour cognitive&language0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
anganwadi private school bodhshala govt school
• Children from govt primary schools are scoring marginally better in adaptive behaviour
• Children attending bodh centres and private schools are scoring better and are more or less at par in cognitive & language component
• Is Bodh able to compensate for home differences in SES?
To what extent quality of preschool programmes influences school readiness levels?State Skills 1st quartile 2nd quartile 3rd quartile 4th quartile
Andhra Pradesh
Cognitive 18.7 14.5 15.9 20.0
Language 2.4 1.7 -0.8 6.6
Adaptive 9.0 10.8 7.5 10.8
Assam
Cognitive 15.3 11.4 17.6 12.8
Language 10.5 4.0 6.9 4.8
Adaptive 4.5 2.9 5.1 3.5
Rajasthan
Cognitive 15.1 22.6 20.1 19.7
Language 9.5 12.4 12.9 15.6
Adaptive 3.6 5.8 12.0 7.5
ECE programme with higher scores on quality across states shows significant impact on school readiness levels
•In Assam, for cognitive and adaptive better centres score better except in language where lower quality programme score better…..Need probing
State Quality of prog Primary Secondary Graduate
Assam
1st Quartile 13.5 19.4 19.42nd Quartile 12.6 2.4 9.33rd Quartile 7.1 17.0 8.44th Quartile 6.8 12.1 0.7
Andhra Pradesh
1st Quartile 13.2 15.5 16.72nd Quartile 7.3 9.0 12.43rd Quartile 7.4 10.7 12.14th Quartile 12.5 18.8 16.4
Rajasthan
1st Quartile 12.6 16.8 17.02nd Quartile 18.4 19.3 30.83rd Quartile 15.3 24.0 17.54th Quartile 16.9 31.3
Impact of programme quality and mother’s education on SR
mother’s education x quality of programme = maximum gain in SRSES is a significant contributor to SR Disadvantage due to SES can be compensated by good quality ECE
ECE programme quality indicators having maximum impact on school readiness
• Appropriate sitting facility for children• Availability of indoor learning and outdoor play material
Infrastructure and material
• Display of learning material • Weekly/Daily schedule followed by teacher• Age appropriateness of activities ensured by teacher
Classroom Management
• Activities for language development and use of language to extend children’s thinking• Activities for development of reading, writing & number readiness & no formal
teaching• Opportunity for free & guided activities under supervision • Comfort level of children in front of strangers
Curricular Transaction
• Ensuring teacher-child interaction
Teacher Disposition
AWC
• Limited infrastructure & learning aids; • Younger children ; less number of 4-6 yr olds;• Good teacher pupil ratio due to low participation;• Formal teaching with some free play, song & rhymes & better
social interaction.
Private Preschool
• Better infrastructure - very few learning aids;• Homogenous group of children with very high
teacher pupil ratio;• Fixed weekly schedule supervised; • Formal teaching with rote memorization.;• Under-qualified & untrained teachers
Innovative ECE practice
• Limited infrastructure but appropriate learning materials; • Flexible weekly & monthly curriculum plans;• Age appropriate planned and developmentally appropriate
activities• Continuous training and supportive supervision
Emerging models in ECE
Activity AWS ( Widespread)
PRIVATE (Widespread)
INNOVATIVE (Scarce)
Developmentally appropriate activities
Low Low Medium
Rhymes and songs High Medium High Conversation Medium Low MediumFormal Teaching High High High Routine Activity High High High Unplanned Play Low Low LowNo Activity High Medium Medium
Opportunities AWS PRIVATE INNOVATIVE
Learn to share Low Low Low Think and answer Medium Medium MediumExpress curiosity & ask questions. Low Low Low
Learn to wait for turn Medium High MediumPlay/work with other children Low Low MediumRote Memory High High Medium
Time on task across models
1. 95% children are enrolled in AP and Assam and 2/3rd in Rajasthan. But difference between enrolment and participation is stark
2. Anganwadi centre found in every village indicating universalition of ICDS
3. Private schools with preschool sections mushrooming at rapid pace particularly in AP and Rajasthan
4. School readiness levels across states and across models are low particularly in cognitive & language skills
5. Participation in ECE programmes for a period of full one year improves overall school readiness levels of children as compared to partial or no participation
6. Better quality preschool programme has significant impact on school readiness levels especially on cognitive and language components
Conclusions
7. Curriculum observed to be deficient in phonemic awareness sequential thinking , pattern making, classification and self- regulation capabilities. Formal teaching of the 3Rs and rote learning seen across models. No graded curriculum in private schools from pre-primary to primary grades. Corporal punishment observed across private schools
8. Household characteristics especially mother’s education is a significant factor
9. Age at which children are exposed to ECE programmes is an important factor in having an impact on school readiness indicating a need for age appropriate curriculum
10. State-wise variations seen in ECE quality as well as school readiness levels especially AWC
Conclusions
•Understand the household determinants of school readiness.
• Estimate contribution of teachers’ characteristics to the quality of ECE content & method.
Further analysis