+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Quality Systems Comparison

Quality Systems Comparison

Date post: 02-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: ngodat
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
CQI Learning Lunch Comparisons of Quality Management Systems Host - Dennis Sergent 517-285-5500 October 20th, 2011 10:30 AM to 2:00 PM University Club of Michigan State 3435 Forest Road, Lansing, MI 48909 517-353-5111
Transcript
Page 1: Quality Systems Comparison

CQI Learning Lunch  

 Comparisons  of  

Quality  Management  Systems  Host - Dennis Sergent

517-285-5500

October 20th, 2011

10:30 AM to 2:00 PM

University Club of Michigan State 3435 Forest Road, Lansing, MI 48909

517-353-5111

Page 2: Quality Systems Comparison

Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 2 05/02-2011  

Sponsoring  Organiza-ons  

Page 3: Quality Systems Comparison

Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 3 05/02-2011  

Today’s  Process  •  A  Short  Review  

–  Baldrige  Award  Standards  –  Deming’s  14  Points  &  PDSA  –  Lean  Principles  –  ISO  –  Six  Sigma  

•  Table  Discussions  –  SIcky  Notes  to  Define    

•  What  adds  value  to  you  and  your  organizaIon?  •  What  are  the  shortcomings  in  each?  •  What  are  the  differences  which  influence  your  thinking?  

Page 4: Quality Systems Comparison

Baldrige  Award  -­‐  Standards  •  Seven  (7)  Criteria  Built  On:  

–  Core  Values  &  Concepts  •  Embedded  in  SystemaIc  Processes  

1.   Leadership  2.   Strategic  Planning  3.   Customer  Focus  4.   Workforce  5.   Measurement,  Analysis,  and  

Knowledge  Management  6.   Process  Management  

•  Yielding  Performance  Results  7.   Focused  On  Outcomes  

•  Very  Consistent  w/Deming    See  Prototype  &  Example  From  Alamo  Community  College  

Page 5: Quality Systems Comparison

Deming’s  14  Points  For  Management  Key to understanding 14 Points is variation.

•   The more special cause variation - the more waste, Deming’s 14 points paraphrased here: 1.  Create constancy of purpose towards improvement.

•  Replace short-term reaction with long-term planning.

2.  Adopt the new philosophy. •  Management should walk the talk.

3.  Cease dependence on inspection. •  Managed variation eliminates need to inspect for defects.

4.  Move towards a single supplier for any one item. •  Multiple suppliers mean variation between feedstocks.

5.  Improve constantly and forever. •  Constantly strive to understand and manage variation.

6.  Institute training on the job. •  Adequately trained staff will all work the same way, and reduce variation.

7.  Institute leadership. •  Mere supervision is quota - and target-based

8.  Drive out fear. •  Long term, it prevents workers from acting in the organization's best interests.

9.  Break down barriers between departments. •  Use the 'internal customer', that each department serves other departments that use its output.

10.  Eliminate slogans. •  It's not people who make most mistakes - it's the process they are working within.

11.  Eliminate management by objectives". •  Deming saw production targets as encouraging the delivery of poor-quality goods.

12.  Remove barriers to pride of workmanship. •  Many of the other problems outlined reduce worker satisfaction.

13.  Institute education and self-improvement. •  Harassing the workforce without improving the processes they use is counter-productive.

14.  The transformation is everyone's job. •  “You do not have to do this. Survival is not compulsory.”

Page 6: Quality Systems Comparison

P-­‐D-­‐C-­‐A  -­‐  Proceed  With  Control  •  We  PLAN  what  we  want  to  accomplish  over  a  period  of  Ime  and  what  we  will  do  to  get  there.  •  We  DO  something  that  furthers  the  strategies  and  goals  developed  in  our  plan.  

We  CHECK  (Study)  the  results  of  our  acIons  to  make  sure  we  achieve  what  we  plan.  We  ACT  by  developing  procedures  to  ensure  our  plans  conInue  to  be  successful  and  by  changing  what  is  needed  to  achieve  the  iniIal  goals.  

AcIon   Plan  

Do  Check  (Study)  

Determine  goals  and  targets  

Determine  methods  of  reaching  goals  

Engage  in  educaIon  and  training  

Implement  work  

Check  the  effects  of  what  we  have  implemented  

Take  appropriate  acIon  to  adopt  the  change,  sustain  it,  abandon  it  or  correct,  prevent  Issues  and  begin  again.  

Ian  Bradbury’s  presentaIon  on  Design  and  Control  of  Quality    has  expanded  our  views  of    the  PDCA  learning  cycle.  

Page 7: Quality Systems Comparison

Deming’s  System  of  Profound  Knowledge  •  “The  aim  .  .  .  is  to  provide  an  outside  view  -­‐  a  

lens  .  .  .  provides  a  map  of  theory  by  which  to  understand  the  organizaIons  that  we  work  in”  

•  Components  of  The  Whole  –  Theory  of  Knowledge    

•  Knowledge  is  built  on  theory  

–  AppreciaIon  for  a  System  •  A  system  is  a  network  of  interdependent  

components  that  work  together  to  accomplish  the  aim  of  the  system  

–  Knowledge  About  VariaIon  •  There  will  always  be  variaIon…..  

–  Psychology  •  Individuals  •  Groups  •  Society  •  Change  

•  “One  need  not  be  eminent  in  any  part  of  profound  knowledge  in  order  to  understand  and  to  apply  it”  

•  “The  various  segments  of  the  system  .  .  .  Cannot  be  separated.    They  interact  with  each  other.    For  example  knowledge  about  psychology  is  incomplete  without  knowledge  of  variaIon.”  

Psychology

Theory of Knowledge

Knowledge

About Variation

Appreciation For a System

AIM

Page 8: Quality Systems Comparison

ISO  Systems  

Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 8 05/02-2011  

•  Large  Family  of  InternaIonal  Standards  •  Quality  Management  Systems  /  Principles  

–  Customer  Focus  –  Leadership  –  Involvement  of  People  –  Process  Approach  –  Systems  Approach  to  Management  –  ConInual  Improvement  –  Fact  Based  Decision  Making  – Mutually  Beneficial  Supplier  RelaIonships  

•  Similar  CharacterisIcs,  but  Different  Approach  to  Quality  

Page 9: Quality Systems Comparison

ISO  Systems  

Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 9 05/02-2011  

•  Similar  CharacterisIcs,  but  Different  Approach  

Page 10: Quality Systems Comparison

Lean  -­‐  10  Rules  1.  Eliminate  waste  2.  Minimize  inventory  3.  Maximize  flow  4.  Pull  producIon  from  customer  demand  5.  Meet  customer  requirements  6.  Do  it  right  the  first  Ime  7.  Empower  workers  8.  Design  for  rapid  changeover  9.  Partner  with  suppliers  10.Create  a  culture  of  conInuous  improvement

Value Value Stream Flow Pull Perfection

Page 11: Quality Systems Comparison

5  Principles  of  Lean  ConInuous  Improvement  

Directly  observe  work  as  acIviIes,  connecIons,  &  flows    Eliminate  waste  systemically  and  systemaIcally    Establish  high  agreement  of  what  &  how    Solve  problems  systemically  and  systemaIcally    Create  a  learning  organizaIon    

Value Value Stream Flow Pull Perfection

Page 12: Quality Systems Comparison

Six  Sigma  -­‐  10  Rules  1.  View  performance  from  the  posiIon  of  the  customer  2.  Understand  the  process  3.  Make  decisions  based  on  data  and  analysis  4.  Focus  on  the  most  important  issues  5.  Use  staIsIcal  models  6.  Pay  akenIon  to  variaIon  7.  Use  standard  methodologies  8.  Select  projects  for  financial  impact  9.  Establish  project  governance  structure  10.  Enlist  senior  management  support

Define Measure Analyze Improve Control Repeat!

Page 13: Quality Systems Comparison

Six  Sigma  •  DMAIC  Process  

Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 13 05/02-2011  

Page 14: Quality Systems Comparison

10/6/11 Sergent Results Group 517-381-5330 Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 14 05/02-2011

Lunch! •  Let’s collect our lunch!

•  Room will be secure

•  Staff will take your drink orders

•  While you dine, discuss this

•  Make sure everyone is heard from

•  Be prepared to share your answers to the following questions!

Page 15: Quality Systems Comparison

10/6/11 Sergent Results Group 517-381-5330 Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 15 05/02-2011

TABLE DISCUSSIONS AT EACH TABLE DISCUSS: •  WHAT ARE OUR NEXT ACTION STEPS?

–  What did I learn here?

–  What do we need to discuss next?

–  Who else should be here?

–  What will we do with this learning?

–  When do we meet again? FACILITATORSKED

Page 16: Quality Systems Comparison

10/6/11 Sergent Results Group 517-381-5330 Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 16 05/02-2011

Future Agenda

Future Discussions = 3 Weeks + 1 Weekday –  November 21st, 2011 = How to Plan the Perfect Meeting

–  December 8th, 2011 = Six Sigma - Plans and Pitfalls

–  January 6th, 2012 = Continuous Improvement Paradigms & Principles

–  January 30th, 2012 = Accelerated Learning and Quality •  What Are Your Ideas?

Page 17: Quality Systems Comparison

10/6/11 Sergent Results Group 517-381-5330 Dennis Sergent 517-381-5330 - Page 17 05/02-2011

Other Subject & Speaker Suggestions

•  Benchmarking •  Brainstorming •  Civility - Lack of it Costs up to $300 Billion Annually (Pattie McNeil) •  Design & Control of Quality (Ian Bradbury of Peaker Services, Inc.) •  Effective Measurement for Training & Development Initiatives •  Gipsie Ranney •  Having Difficult Conversations - Principles and Tools •  Influence (Influencing Your Leader and Your Team) •  Lean Project: Eliminating the Waste In Performance Reviews (R. Steele of Peaker Services)

•  Mentoring & Partnership Between Generations (Baby Boomer, GenX, GenY, Transition to Future) •  Quality Assurance Through Proofing

•  What Are Your Ideas?

Page 18: Quality Systems Comparison

 Comparisons  of  Quality  Management  Systems

CQI LEARNING LUNCH


Recommended