+ All Categories
Home > Documents > QuantRiskMethod(4D)

QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Date post: 14-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: joao-santos
View: 440 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Quantitative Risk Analysis Model (Quadrimensional Model - 4D) Template
101
QUANTITAT inc Joao Luis
Transcript
Page 1: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSISincludes global uncertainty calculation

Joao Luis Santos | RISIKO TECHNIK GRUPPE (2007)

Page 2: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

copyright

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSISincludes global uncertainty calculation

Joao Luis Santos | RISIKO TECHNIK GRUPPE (2007)

N13
Risiko Technik: The author is a professional engineer and an independent consultant with more than ten years of industrial experience in chemical, petroleum and petrochemical industries where he designed process safety systems and made industrial risk analysis, performed safety reviews, implemented compliance solutions, and participated in process safety management (PSM). The author holds a Bachelor (B. Eng.) degree in Chemical Engineering and Licentiate (Lic. Eng.) degree in Chemical Engineering from School of Engineering of Polytechnic Institute of Oporto (Portugal), and a Master (M. Sc.) degree in Environmental Engineering from Faculty of Engineering of the University of Oporto (Portugal). Also, he has an Advanced Diploma in Safety and Occupational Health from the Institute for Welding and Quality (ISQ) and he is licensed and certified by ACT (National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health, Work Conditions National Authority). Notice This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by Risiko Technik Gruppe (RTG). Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Risiko Technik Gruppe, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. Available to the public from the sponsor agency: Risiko Technik Gruppe Office of Scientific and Technical Information can be requested to: E-Mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.geocities/risiko.technik/index.html Available to the public from the author by request: E-Mail: [email protected]
Page 3: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS

Risk Statistics

Type of Hazards

Hazard Control Measures

Hazard Checklist

Business Identification

Business Safety Information

Audit Tool

Risk Matrix

Page 4: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS

Cost of Injuries and Illness

Hazard and Risk Identification

Injury and Illness Analysis

Loss Criticality analysis

Risk Analysis

Actions and Recomendations

Risk Analysis Report

Page 5: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

I. PROBABILITY OF DEATH BY ACCIDENT

FAF

Risk Probability Index Notes

Thunder 5.6E-07

Cyclone 4.0E-07 Carabean Islands (3,0E-4)

Car accident 1.0E-04

Airplane accident 1.0E-07

Gas explosion 7.0E-05

Fire 1.0E-06

Dam rupture 1.0E-08

Building's material falling 3.0E-06

Meteorite 6.0E-11

Eearthquake 1.7E-06

II. PROBABILITY OF DEATH BY INDUSTRY SECTOR

FAF

Industry Sector Probability Index Notes

Textile Industry 3.75E-06 0.2

Automobile Industry 3.25E-05 1.3

Wood Industry 7.50E-05 3.0

Chemical Industry 1.00E-04 4.0

Metallurgic Industry 1.75E-04 7.0

Agriculture 2.50E-04 10.0

Mine Industry 3.00E-04 12.0

Fishing Industry 1.17E-03 35.0

Construction 1.60E-03 64.0

III. OVERPRESSURE EFFECTS

Overpressure

Effects (atm) Effects

0.01 50% of window break

0.04 90% of window break

0.20 Severe damage in structures

0.40 Ear damage, structure damage

0.70 Rupture of lums and another internal organs

0.80 Total destruction of structures

IV. EFFECTS OF THERMAL RADIATION

Radiation Distance Exposition

Level (m) (s) Effects

400.0 0 Brick wall fall

200.0 0 Ciment wall fall

60.0 0 Steel ductibility

40.0 0 900 PVC burning

10.0 0 20 3rd degree burning

6.5 0 20 2sd degree burning

4.0 0 20 1st degree burning

1.0 0 Human tolerence

G8
Risiko Technik: Deaths by 1,000 workers for 100 million work-hours (40 years of work). Source: HSE, UK.
G25
Risiko Technik: Deaths by 1,000 workers for 100 million work-hours (40 years of work). Source: HSE, UK.
C54
AMBISCIENTIA: In KJ/m2 units.
Page 6: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Home

Page 7: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARDS SEVERITY

CORROSIVITY / IRRITATION TOXICITY FLAMMABILIBITY / COMBUSTIBILITY

pH LC50 LD50 Temperature

Basic Acid ppm mg/kg ºF ºC

14 5 > 10.000 > 5000 > 200 > 95

13 4 10,000 1,000 5,000 500 200 150 93

12 3 1,000 100 500 50 150 100 66

11 2 100 10 50 1 100 0 38

10 1 < 10 < 1 < 0 < -18

HAZARDS EXPOSURE

PEL / TLV Hazard Route of Physical Pressure

ppm Ratio Exposure Form mmHg

> 1.000 < 10 Ingestion Solids < 1

1,000 100 10 1,000 Skin Contact Liquids 1

100 10 1,000 10,000 Ingestion + Skin Contact Mists 10

10 1 10,000 100,000 Inhalation Vapors 100

< 1 > 100.000 Inhalation + Ingestion+ Skin Gases > 70

Home

Page 8: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARDS SEVERITY

FLAMMABILIBITY / COMBUSTIBILITY

Temperature

ºC

> 95

66

38

18

< -18

HAZARDS EXPOSURE

Pressure

mmHg

< 1

10

100

760

> 70

Page 9: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Home

ElectricalShock, Burns, Overheating, Ignition of combustibles inadvertent activation, Power outage, Distribution backfeed, Unsafe failure to operate, Explosion/electrical (electrostatic), Explosion (electrical arc).

MechanicalSharp edges and points, Rotating equipment, Reciprocating equipment, Pinch points, Lifting weights, Stability (toppling potential), Ejected parts or fragments, Crushing surfaces.

Pneumatic, Hydraulic PressureOverpressurization, Pipe or vessel or duct rupture, Implosion, Mislocated relief device, Dynamic pressure loading, Relief pressure improperly set, Backflow, Crossflow, Hydraulic ram, Inadvertent release, Miscalibratedrelief device, Blown objects, Pipe or hose whip, Blast.

Acceleration, Deceleration GravityLoose object translation, Impacts, Falling objects, Inadvertent motion, Fragments or missiles, Sloshing liquids, Slip or trip, Falls.

Temperature ExtremesHeat source or sink, Hot or cold surface burns, Pressure elevation, Confined gas or liquid, Elevated flammability, Elevated volatility, Elevated reactivity, Freezing humidity or moisture, Reduced reliability, Altered structural properties (e.g., embrittlement).

Fire and Flammability (presence of...)Fuel, Ignition source, Oxidizer, Propellant.

RadiationIonizing: Alpha, Beta, Neutron, Gamma, X-Ray.Non-Ionizing: Laser, Infrared, Microwave, Ultraviolet.

ExplosivesInitiators: Heat, Friction, Impact or shock, Vibration, Electrostatic discharge, Chemical contamination, Lighting, Welding (stray current or sparks).Effects: Mass fire, Blast overpressure, Thrown fragments, Seismic ground wave, Meteorological reinforcement.Sensitizers: Heat or cold, Vibration, Impact or shock, Low humidity, Chemical contamination.Conditions: Explosive propellant present, Explosive gas present, Explosive liquid present, Explosive vapor present, Explosive dust present.

Leaks and SpillsMaterials conditions: Liquids/cryogens, Gases/vapors, Dust-irritating, Radiation sources, Flammable, Toxic, Reactive, Slippery, Odorous, Pathogenic, Asphyxiating, Flooding, Run off, Vapor propagation, Corrosive.

Chemical and Water ContaminationSystem cross-connection, Leaks and spills, Vessel/ and pipe and conduit rupture, Backflow or siphon effect.

Physiological (see Ergonomic)Temperature extremes, Nuisance dusts/odors, Baropressureextremes, Fatigue, Lifted weights, Noise, Vibration (Raynaud’sSyndrome), Mutagens, Asphyxiants, Allergens, Pathogens, Radiation (see Radiation), Cryogens, Carcinogens, Teratogens, Toxins, Irritants.

Human Factors (see Ergonomic)Operator error, Inadvertent operation, Failure to operate, Operation early or late, Operation out-of-sequence, Right operation or wrong control, Operate too long, Operate too briefly.

Ergonomic (see Human Factors)Fatigue, Inaccessibilit, Nonexistent or inadequate “kill” switches, Glare, Inadequate Control or Readout Differentiation, Inappropriate control or readout labelin, Faulty workstation desig, Inadequate or improper illumination, Inappropriate Control or readout Location, Faulty or Inadequate Control or Readout Labeling.

Control SystemsPower outage, Interference (EMI or ESI), Moisture, Sneak circuit, Sneak software, Lightning strike, Grounding failure, Inadvertent activation.

Mission PhasingTransport, Delivery, Installation, Calibration, Checkout, Shake down, Activation, Standard start, Emergency start, Normal operation, Load change, Coupling and uncoupling, Stressed operation, Standard shutdown, Emergency shutdown, Diagnosis and trouble shooting, Maintenance.

Page 10: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

ElectricalShock, Burns, Overheating, Ignition of combustibles inadvertent activation, Power outage, Distribution backfeed, Unsafe failure to operate, Explosion/electrical (electrostatic), Explosion (electrical arc).

MechanicalSharp edges and points, Rotating equipment, Reciprocating equipment, Pinch points, Lifting weights, Stability (toppling potential), Ejected parts or fragments, Crushing surfaces.

Pneumatic, Hydraulic PressureOverpressurization, Pipe or vessel or duct rupture, Implosion, Mislocated relief device, Dynamic pressure loading, Relief pressure improperly set, Backflow, Crossflow, Hydraulic ram, Inadvertent release, Miscalibratedrelief device, Blown objects, Pipe or hose whip, Blast.

Acceleration, Deceleration GravityLoose object translation, Impacts, Falling objects, Inadvertent motion, Fragments or missiles, Sloshing liquids, Slip or trip, Falls.

Temperature ExtremesHeat source or sink, Hot or cold surface burns, Pressure elevation, Confined gas or liquid, Elevated flammability, Elevated volatility, Elevated reactivity, Freezing humidity or moisture, Reduced reliability, Altered structural properties (e.g., embrittlement).

Fire and Flammability (presence of...)Fuel, Ignition source, Oxidizer, Propellant.

RadiationIonizing: Alpha, Beta, Neutron, Gamma, X-Ray.Non-Ionizing: Laser, Infrared, Microwave, Ultraviolet.

ExplosivesInitiators: Heat, Friction, Impact or shock, Vibration, Electrostatic discharge, Chemical contamination, Lighting, Welding (stray current or sparks).Effects: Mass fire, Blast overpressure, Thrown fragments, Seismic ground wave, Meteorological reinforcement.Sensitizers: Heat or cold, Vibration, Impact or shock, Low humidity, Chemical contamination.Conditions: Explosive propellant present, Explosive gas present, Explosive liquid present, Explosive vapor present, Explosive dust present.

Leaks and SpillsMaterials conditions: Liquids/cryogens, Gases/vapors, Dust-irritating, Radiation sources, Flammable, Toxic, Reactive, Slippery, Odorous, Pathogenic, Asphyxiating, Flooding, Run off, Vapor propagation, Corrosive.

Chemical and Water ContaminationSystem cross-connection, Leaks and spills, Vessel/ and pipe and conduit rupture, Backflow or siphon effect.

Physiological (see Ergonomic)Temperature extremes, Nuisance dusts/odors, Baropressureextremes, Fatigue, Lifted weights, Noise, Vibration (Raynaud’sSyndrome), Mutagens, Asphyxiants, Allergens, Pathogens, Radiation (see Radiation), Cryogens, Carcinogens, Teratogens, Toxins, Irritants.

Human Factors (see Ergonomic)Operator error, Inadvertent operation, Failure to operate, Operation early or late, Operation out-of-sequence, Right operation or wrong control, Operate too long, Operate too briefly.

Ergonomic (see Human Factors)Fatigue, Inaccessibilit, Nonexistent or inadequate “kill” switches, Glare, Inadequate Control or Readout Differentiation, Inappropriate control or readout labelin, Faulty workstation desig, Inadequate or improper illumination, Inappropriate Control or readout Location, Faulty or Inadequate Control or Readout Labeling.

Control SystemsPower outage, Interference (EMI or ESI), Moisture, Sneak circuit, Sneak software, Lightning strike, Grounding failure, Inadvertent activation.

Mission PhasingTransport, Delivery, Installation, Calibration, Checkout, Shake down, Activation, Standard start, Emergency start, Normal operation, Load change, Coupling and uncoupling, Stressed operation, Standard shutdown, Emergency shutdown, Diagnosis and trouble shooting, Maintenance.

Page 11: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

ElectricalShock, Burns, Overheating, Ignition of combustibles inadvertent activation, Power outage, Distribution backfeed, Unsafe failure to operate, Explosion/electrical (electrostatic), Explosion (electrical arc).

MechanicalSharp edges and points, Rotating equipment, Reciprocating equipment, Pinch points, Lifting weights, Stability (toppling potential), Ejected parts or fragments, Crushing surfaces.

Pneumatic, Hydraulic PressureOverpressurization, Pipe or vessel or duct rupture, Implosion, Mislocated relief device, Dynamic pressure loading, Relief pressure improperly set, Backflow, Crossflow, Hydraulic ram, Inadvertent release, Miscalibratedrelief device, Blown objects, Pipe or hose whip, Blast.

Acceleration, Deceleration GravityLoose object translation, Impacts, Falling objects, Inadvertent motion, Fragments or missiles, Sloshing liquids, Slip or trip, Falls.

Temperature ExtremesHeat source or sink, Hot or cold surface burns, Pressure elevation, Confined gas or liquid, Elevated flammability, Elevated volatility, Elevated reactivity, Freezing humidity or moisture, Reduced reliability, Altered structural properties (e.g., embrittlement).

Fire and Flammability (presence of...)Fuel, Ignition source, Oxidizer, Propellant.

RadiationIonizing: Alpha, Beta, Neutron, Gamma, X-Ray.Non-Ionizing: Laser, Infrared, Microwave, Ultraviolet.

ExplosivesInitiators: Heat, Friction, Impact or shock, Vibration, Electrostatic discharge, Chemical contamination, Lighting, Welding (stray current or sparks).Effects: Mass fire, Blast overpressure, Thrown fragments, Seismic ground wave, Meteorological reinforcement.Sensitizers: Heat or cold, Vibration, Impact or shock, Low humidity, Chemical contamination.Conditions: Explosive propellant present, Explosive gas present, Explosive liquid present, Explosive vapor present, Explosive dust present.

Leaks and SpillsMaterials conditions: Liquids/cryogens, Gases/vapors, Dust-irritating, Radiation sources, Flammable, Toxic, Reactive, Slippery, Odorous, Pathogenic, Asphyxiating, Flooding, Run off, Vapor propagation, Corrosive.

Chemical and Water ContaminationSystem cross-connection, Leaks and spills, Vessel/ and pipe and conduit rupture, Backflow or siphon effect.

Physiological (see Ergonomic)Temperature extremes, Nuisance dusts/odors, Baropressureextremes, Fatigue, Lifted weights, Noise, Vibration (Raynaud’sSyndrome), Mutagens, Asphyxiants, Allergens, Pathogens, Radiation (see Radiation), Cryogens, Carcinogens, Teratogens, Toxins, Irritants.

Human Factors (see Ergonomic)Operator error, Inadvertent operation, Failure to operate, Operation early or late, Operation out-of-sequence, Right operation or wrong control, Operate too long, Operate too briefly.

Ergonomic (see Human Factors)Fatigue, Inaccessibilit, Nonexistent or inadequate “kill” switches, Glare, Inadequate Control or Readout Differentiation, Inappropriate control or readout labelin, Faulty workstation desig, Inadequate or improper illumination, Inappropriate Control or readout Location, Faulty or Inadequate Control or Readout Labeling.

Control SystemsPower outage, Interference (EMI or ESI), Moisture, Sneak circuit, Sneak software, Lightning strike, Grounding failure, Inadvertent activation.

Mission PhasingTransport, Delivery, Installation, Calibration, Checkout, Shake down, Activation, Standard start, Emergency start, Normal operation, Load change, Coupling and uncoupling, Stressed operation, Standard shutdown, Emergency shutdown, Diagnosis and trouble shooting, Maintenance.

Page 12: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

I. UNEVEN OR SLIPPERY FLAT SURFACES

Selecting flooring carefully, especially if it is likely to become wet or dusty due to work processes; keeping surfaces dry.

If necessary, treating slippery surfaces chemically; using appropriate cleaning methods.

Ensuring regular checking of the floor and traffic routes.

Removing holes, cracks, worn carpets, or rugs, etc.; keeping floors and traffic routes clear.

Removing thresholds or limiting their height; improving their visibility.

Providing workers with suitable footwear.

Ensuring that floors and traffic routes are appropriate marked.

Ensuring adequate lighting of floors and traffic routes.

Positioning equipment so as to avoid cables crossing pedestrian routes; using cable covers to fix them securely to surfaces.

Using anti-slippery and easy to clean materials on floors and traffic routes.

Ensuring proper flow of liquids from the surface of floors and traffic routes.

II. MOVING VEHICLES AND MACHINES

Ensuring that means of transport are appropriate for the work to be done.

Using work equipment with appropriate certificates/licences.

Using work equipment according to manufacturers’ information and manuals.

Carrying out regular technical inspection of work equipment.

Ensuring that transport routes are appropriately marked and kept tidy.

Ensuring that routes are wide enough and that there are no “blind spots” on them.

Ensuring that loads are placed and secured properly.

Ensuring that workers are adequately trained.

Ensuring that self-propelled means of transport have facilities that prevent unexpected start-up.

III. MOVING PARTS OF MACHINES

Ensuring that machines are operated by trained and authorised workers.

Ensuring that all proper guards are in place and that they work.

Using posters and signs to remind workers of the need to use guards.

Ensuring that that all necessary guards are in place before starting any machine.

Ensuring that areas around machines are clean, tidy, and free of obstructions.

Ensuring sufficient space to allow easy movement of workers.

Providing appropriate personal protective equipment.

Ensuring adequate lighting on machines and around machines.

Implementing a clear system of warning information to prevent defective machines being started accidentally.

Ensuring that machines are maintained and that defects repaired promptly.

Ensuring that there is sufficient space between the moving parts of a machine and fixed parts near the machine.

IV. ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND EQUIPMENT

Carrying out a visual check for defects before work starts.

Ensuring regular tests carried out by electrical experts.

Using only equipment with the EC mark.

In the event of equipment damage or defects: switching off the power and pulling out the plug immediately

and reporting the damage.

Ensuring that defects are repaired by an electrical expert.

Selecting appropriate type of equipment (such as IP protection type, mechanical protection, etc.).

Carrying out work according to instructions.

De-energising lines.

Limiting the work areas of hoisting equipment.

Checking electrical equipment before it is used after repairs, and on a regular basis.

Using earth wires.

V. FIRE

Using ventilation and monitoring concentrations.

Providing Material Safety Data Sheets for all explosive chemical substances.

Preventing or eliminating sources of ignition.

Keeping substances which can form exposable mixtures with air away from open flames,

electrical equipment, sparks, etc.

Keeping stored quantities to a minimum.

Page 13: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Following instructions not to store certain products together.

Avoiding contamination and not putting quantities of a product taken from an original container back into it.

Cordoning off any danger explosive areas.

Marking any explosive areas.

Making sure that appropriate permissions for work with the use of an open flame are in place.

Marking escape and rescue routes and keeping them free from obstacles.

Training employees.

Carrying out emergency drills.

Page 14: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

VI. CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

Substituting very toxic by less toxic substances.

Elimination of carcinogenic and mutagenic substances, if possible.

Using automated systems for applying hazardous chemical substances.

Providing Material Safety Data Sheets for all hazardous chemical substances.

Ensuring that all hazardous chemical substances are properly labelled.

Ensuring that all hazardous chemical substances are properly handled.

Segregating combustible and flammable hazardous chemical substances from one another.

Ensuring that the concentrations of hazardous chemical substances are measured and monitored.

Installing appropriate collective protection equipment.

Ensuring that workers are equipped with personal protective equipment.

Providing continuous local exhaust ventilation at all workplaces where the concentration of chemical substances

exceeds Maximum Admissible Concentration (exhaust systems for, e. g., spraying, painting, or coating).

Carrying out regular technical checks of the equipment used with chemicals.

Inspecting and cleaning exhaust ventilation systems on a regular basis to maintain maximum efficiency.

Ensuring regular medical examinations for workers exposed to hazardous chemical substances,

especially to carcinogenic or mutagenic ones.

Regular training of workers about risk posed by hazardous chemical substances and safe work with them.

VII. NOISE

Determining workers’ exposure; checking compliance with the limits established in legal requirements.

Introducing engineering controls which can reduce noise emission (e. g., isolating vibrating machinery

or components from their surroundings, fitting air exhausts with silencers).

Positioning sources of noise further away from workers.

Limiting time spent in noisy areas.

Mounting enclosures around machines to reduce noise emission.

Introducing barriers or screens to block the direct path of sound.

Identifying ear protection zones and marking them with signs showing that hearing protection must be worn.

Providing appropriate hearing protection (in consultation with employees or their representatives).

Ensuring that hearing protection is used.

Ensuring that hearing protection works effectively and is properly maintained.

Providing information, instruction, and training.

Ensuring regular hearing checks for all workers exposed to high level noise.

VIII. VIBRATION

Determining workers’ personal exposure to vibration; checking compliance with the limits established by law.

Isolating the workplace (seats, floors) from vibration.

Avoiding equipment and tools which generate vibration.

Reducing time spent working with equipment generating vibration.

Using the right tools (equipped with insulated or low-impact hand grips, etc.)

and ensuring that they are properly maintained.

Following the instructions for use of equipment and tools.

Ensuring appropriate training and information.

Providing protective gloves to ensure protection from hand-arm vibration.

Ensuring that protective gloves are used and properly maintained.

Keeping warm at work, especially warm hands; doing hand exercises.

Providing protective clothing necessary to keep workers warm and dry.

Ensuring regular medical examinations.

IX. LIGHTING

Periodic measurements of lighting and lighting uniformity in the task area and the surrounding area at the workplace.

Periodic measurements of lighting and lighting uniformity in circulation areas, corridors, stairs, etc.

Compliance with the lighting designer’s maintenance programme, including frequency of lamp replacement,

room cleaning intervals, and cleaning methods.

Compliance with the principles of lighting design such as workplace arrangements, type and specifications of

lamps (power, light colour, and colour rendering factor), and surface finishes (reflectance, colour, matt, or glossy).

Using additional local or localised lighting at the workplace where high levels of lighting are required.

Using more indirect lighting and local lighting to eliminate shadows in the task area.

Avoiding glossy surfaces at the workplace (tables, other furniture, etc.).

Page 15: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Avoiding the flicker and stroboscopic effect.

Periodic use of a checklist or conducting interviews with workers related to problems with lighting.

Home

Page 16: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

I. GENERAL CHECKLIST

1. Uneven or slippery surfaces (which can cause slips, trips, falls, etc.)

2 . Moving vehicles and machines

3. Moving parts of machines

4. Objects and parts with dangerous surfaces (sharp, rough, etc.)

5. Hot or could surfaces, materials, etc.

6. High workplaces and climbing points (which can cause falls from a height)

7. Hand tools

8. High pressure

9. Electrical installations and equipment

10. Fire

11 . Explosion

12 . Chemical substances (including dust) in the air

13. Noise

14. Hand-arm vibration

15. Whole-body vibration

16. Lighting

17. UV, IR, laser, and microwave radiation

18. Electromagnetic fields

19. Hot or cold climate

20. Lifting and carrying loads

21 . Work involving poor posture

22 . Biological hazards (viruses, parasites, moulds, bacteria)

23. Stress, violence, harassment (mobbing)

II. UNEVEN OR SLIPPERY FLAT SURFACES

1. Do the floors have uneven areas, loose finishes, holes, spills etc.?

2. Are the floors sometimes slippery, e. g., when they are wet due to cleaning, spilling of liquids (e. g., oil), rain or mud, or dusty due to work processes?

3. Are there thresholds or other changes of level on the floors?

4. Are there trailing cables on the floor?

5. Can workers fall or slip due to unsuitable footwear?

6. Are the floors kept tidy?

7. Are there any obstructions and objects (excluding those which cannot be removed) left lying around in work areas?

8. Are obstructions that cannot be removed marked?

9. Are all traffic routes appropriately marked?

10. Is the lighting of floors and traffic routes appropriate?

III. MOVING VEHICLES AND MACHINES

1. Are means of transport ever used in spite of failures and malfunctions?

2. Are the means of transport and work equipment for loading/unloading (e. g., vehicles, hoists, lifting platforms) ever overloaded?

3. Are transport routes free of obstructions?

4. Is the field of vision on transport routes reduced?

5. Are the means of transport ever used by unauthorised people?

6. Are loads always secured properly?

7. Is the drivers’ field of vision ever reduced by bulky loads?

IV. MOVING PARTS OF MACHINES

1. Are there any hazardous moving parts in the machines (including auxiliary parts) without safeguards?

2. Do machine safeguards sufficiently prevent workers‘ hands, arms, or other parts of the body from contact with dangerous moving parts?

3. Are all machine guards secured firmly and not easily removable?

4. Can an object fall onto the moving parts of a machine?

5. Do safeguards make the operation of a machine inconvenient or more difficult?

6. Can a machine be oiled without removing the safeguard?

7. Is it possible to remove safeguards without stopping dangerous movements?

8. Are there any unguarded gears, sprockets, pulleys, or flywheels?

9. Are there any exposed belts or chain drives?

10. Are there any exposed set screws, key ways, collars, etc.?

11. Is it easy for an operator to reach ON/OFF controls?

12. Is there one control for more than one operator?

Page 17: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

V. ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND EQUIPMENT

1. Are you sure that safety devices and switches are in place and that they work?

2. Is there any damaged insulation on lines (e. g., kinks or exposed wires)?

3. Is there any damaged electrical equipment housing, or housing not protected against unauthorised approach?

4. Is there any electrical equipment housing without sign IEC – 60417-5036 (a black thunderbolt on a yellow background within a black triangle)?

5. Are there any damaged plugs or sockets?

6. Is it possible to use electrical equipment in an improper way?

7. Is it possible to use damp electrical equipment or to use electrical equipment with wet hands or in damp clothing?

8. Is it possible to work in dangerous proximity to electrical systems?

9. Are there any live parts near work areas?

10. Are there any exposed conductive parts not connected to the earthing system?

11. Are there any electrostatic charges (such as when refuelling)?

VI. FIRE

1. Are oxidising or flammable substances, such as paint, finishes, adhesives, and solvents used?

2. Are oxidising and flammable substances stored in ventilated rooms?

3. Are Material Safety Data Sheets available for all dangerous chemicals used?

4. Are there any sources of ignition (e. g., open fire, electrical equipment, electrostatic charges, or high temperature)?

5. Are fire-hazard areas appropriately signed?

6. Are employees who use combustible or flammable substances regularly informed about the dangerous properties of these chemicals?

7. Is fire-fighting equipment in place and is it suitable?

8. Is fire-fighting equipment serviceable and serviced regularly?

9. Is fire-fighting equipment easily accessible?

10. Are there emergency and escape plans?

11. Are escape routes marked?

12. Are there fire alarms?

13. Are fire-fighting and alarm drills carried out?

14. Is fire-fighting training provided?

VII. CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES

1. Are hazardous chemical substances (classified as very toxic, toxic, harmful, corrosive, irritant, sensitising, carcinogenic, mutagenic, toxic to reproduction, explosive, oxidising, extremely flammable, highly flammable, or flammable) used?

2. Are Material Safety Data Sheets available for all the hazardous chemicals that are used?

3. Are all hazardous chemicals properly labelled?

4. Are all hazardous chemicals properly handled?

5. Are all the workers who use hazardous chemical substances regularly informed about the dangerous properties of these chemicals?

6. Do young workers or pregnant women have contact with carcinogenic or mutagenic substances?

7. Do you ensure measurements of the concentration (in workplace air) of substances for which Maximum Admissible Concentrations have been established?

8. Are the concentrations of chemical substances in workplace air lower than Maximum Admissible Concentrations?

9. Is collective protective equipment (general ventilation and local ventilation systems) for all workplaces where chemicals are used provided?

10. Are ventilation systems checked regularly?

11. Is personal protective equipment (gloves, goggles or face shields, respirators) for workers who use chemicals provided?

12. Are regular medical examinations for workers exposed to hazardous chemical substances or preparations provided?

13. Are workers exposed to carcinogenic substances under special medical care?

14. Are all the workers trained in the proper way of using and handling hazardous chemical substances or preparations?

VIII. NOISE

1. Can high noise levels arise as a result of work processes (e. g., metal-on-metal impact, engines)?

2. Can high noise levels arise as a result of ambient noise which penetrates buildings?

3. Can operating noise mask alarm signals?

4. Is the noise so loud that you would have to raise your voice to talk to people at your workplace?

5. Do you unintentionally raise your voice when you talk to people after leaving your workplace?

IX. VIBRATION

1. Is work done (often or over long periods) in conditions in which clearly perceptible vibrations can be felt when standing or sitting?

2. Is work done (often or over long periods) using hand-held power tools and equipment which can generate vibration?

X. LIGHTING

1. Is lighting at the workplace sufficient to perform tasks efficiently and accurately?

2. Are there visible shadows in the task area which may affect efficiency and accuracy of work?

3. Is the lighting of circulation areas, corridors, stairs, storage rooms, etc., adequate to move

safely and to notice any obstacles (holes in the ground, objects lying on the ground, steps,

Page 18: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

slippery surfaces or spills, the edge of a platform, etc.)?

4. Can bright sources/surfaces impair workers’ vision of objects?

5. Are there any complaints from workers related to poor visibility, glare, or unsuitable

lighting at the workplace?

6. Are there excessive contrasts in the field of vision which can result in fatigue

or constant re-adaptation of the eyes?

7. Are there veiling reflections in the work area (direct reflections from polished, shiny,

or glossy surfaces) which alter task visibility?

8. Are there large spatial variations in lighting around the work area which may lead

to visual stress?

9. Are the colours of objects and of skin, in the work environment, rendered naturally

under existing artificial lighting?

10. Are safety colours recognisable under existing artificial lighting?

11. Can workers see the flicker of light?

12. Is rotating machinery perceived as motionless during its normal work under existing

artificial lighting (i. e., there is the stroboscopic effect)?

Home

Page 19: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Probability of Occurence

1.00E-06 1.00E-05 5.00E-05 1.00E-04 5.00E-04 1.00E-03 5.00E-03 1.00E-02 5.00E-02

1.00E-10 2.00E-09 1.50E-08 4.00E-08 2.50E-07 6.00E-07 3.50E-06 8.00E-06 4.50E-05

2.00E-10 4.00E-09 3.00E-08 8.00E-08 5.00E-07 1.20E-06 7.00E-06 1.60E-05 9.00E-05

3.00E-10 6.00E-09 4.50E-08 1.20E-07 7.50E-07 1.80E-06 1.05E-05 2.40E-05 1.35E-04

4.00E-10 8.00E-09 6.00E-08 1.60E-07 1.00E-06 2.40E-06 1.40E-05 3.20E-05 1.80E-04

5.00E-10 1.00E-08 7.50E-08 2.00E-07 1.25E-06 3.00E-06 1.75E-05 4.00E-05 2.25E-04

6.00E-10 1.20E-08 9.00E-08 2.40E-07 1.50E-06 3.60E-06 2.10E-05 4.80E-05 2.70E-04

7.00E-10 1.40E-08 1.05E-07 2.80E-07 1.75E-06 4.20E-06 2.45E-05 5.60E-05 3.15E-04

8.00E-10 1.60E-08 1.20E-07 3.20E-07 2.00E-06 4.80E-06 2.80E-05 6.40E-05 3.60E-04

9.00E-10 1.80E-08 1.35E-07 3.60E-07 2.25E-06 5.40E-06 3.15E-05 7.20E-05 4.05E-04

1.00E-09 2.00E-08 1.50E-07 4.00E-07 2.50E-06 6.00E-06 3.50E-05 8.00E-05 4.50E-04

2.00E-09 4.00E-08 3.00E-07 8.00E-07 5.00E-06 1.20E-05 7.00E-05 1.60E-04 9.00E-04

3.00E-09 6.00E-08 4.50E-07 1.20E-06 7.50E-06 1.80E-05 1.05E-04 2.40E-04 1.35E-03

4.00E-09 8.00E-08 6.00E-07 1.60E-06 1.00E-05 2.40E-05 1.40E-04 3.20E-04 1.80E-03

5.00E-09 1.00E-07 7.50E-07 2.00E-06 1.25E-05 3.00E-05 1.75E-04 4.00E-04 2.25E-03

6.00E-09 1.20E-07 9.00E-07 2.40E-06 1.50E-05 3.60E-05 2.10E-04 4.80E-04 2.70E-03

7.00E-09 1.40E-07 1.05E-06 2.80E-06 1.75E-05 4.20E-05 2.45E-04 5.60E-04 3.15E-03

8.00E-09 1.60E-07 1.20E-06 3.20E-06 2.00E-05 4.80E-05 2.80E-04 6.40E-04 3.60E-03

9.00E-09 1.80E-07 1.35E-06 3.60E-06 2.25E-05 5.40E-05 3.15E-04 7.20E-04 4.05E-03

1.00E-08 2.00E-07 1.50E-06 4.00E-06 2.50E-05 6.00E-05 3.50E-04 8.00E-04 4.50E-03

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09

Probability of Exposure

RISK LEVEL Class Category Risk Control

< 1.00E-10 I Negligible Education, Information, Tranning.

1.00E-10 3.60E-06 II Low Administrative Procedures and Trainning.

3.60E-06 1.80E-03 III Moderate Administrative and Trainning, Personal Protective Equipment.

1.80E-03 3.60E-02 IV Significant Substitution, Personal Protective Equipment, Engineering Actions.

3.60E-02 1.00E+00 V High Engineering Actions, Substitution, Possible Elimination.

1.00E+00 > VI Extreme Elimination and Engineering Actions.

Page 20: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Probability of Occurence

0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90

1.00E-04 4.00E-04 9.00E-04 1.60E-03 2.50E-03 3.60E-03 4.90E-03 6.40E-03 8.10E-03

2.00E-04 8.00E-04 1.80E-03 3.20E-03 5.00E-03 7.20E-03 9.80E-03 1.28E-02 1.62E-02

3.00E-04 1.20E-03 2.70E-03 4.80E-03 7.50E-03 1.08E-02 1.47E-02 1.92E-02 2.43E-02

4.00E-04 1.60E-03 3.60E-03 6.40E-03 1.00E-02 1.44E-02 1.96E-02 2.56E-02 3.24E-02

5.00E-04 2.00E-03 4.50E-03 8.00E-03 1.25E-02 1.80E-02 2.45E-02 3.20E-02 4.05E-02

6.00E-04 2.40E-03 5.40E-03 9.60E-03 1.50E-02 2.16E-02 2.94E-02 3.84E-02 4.86E-02

7.00E-04 2.80E-03 6.30E-03 1.12E-02 1.75E-02 2.52E-02 3.43E-02 4.48E-02 5.67E-02

8.00E-04 3.20E-03 7.20E-03 1.28E-02 2.00E-02 2.88E-02 3.92E-02 5.12E-02 6.48E-02

9.00E-04 3.60E-03 8.10E-03 1.44E-02 2.25E-02 3.24E-02 4.41E-02 5.76E-02 7.29E-02

1.00E-03 4.00E-03 9.00E-03 1.60E-02 2.50E-02 3.60E-02 4.90E-02 6.40E-02 8.10E-02

2.00E-03 8.00E-03 1.80E-02 3.20E-02 5.00E-02 7.20E-02 9.80E-02 1.28E-01 1.62E-01

3.00E-03 1.20E-02 2.70E-02 4.80E-02 7.50E-02 1.08E-01 1.47E-01 1.92E-01 2.43E-01

4.00E-03 1.60E-02 3.60E-02 6.40E-02 1.00E-01 1.44E-01 1.96E-01 2.56E-01 3.24E-01

5.00E-03 2.00E-02 4.50E-02 8.00E-02 1.25E-01 1.80E-01 2.45E-01 3.20E-01 4.05E-01

6.00E-03 2.40E-02 5.40E-02 9.60E-02 1.50E-01 2.16E-01 2.94E-01 3.84E-01 4.86E-01

7.00E-03 2.80E-02 6.30E-02 1.12E-01 1.75E-01 2.52E-01 3.43E-01 4.48E-01 5.67E-01

8.00E-03 3.20E-02 7.20E-02 1.28E-01 2.00E-01 2.88E-01 3.92E-01 5.12E-01 6.48E-01

9.00E-03 3.60E-02 8.10E-02 1.44E-01 2.25E-01 3.24E-01 4.41E-01 5.76E-01 7.29E-01

1.00E-02 4.00E-02 9.00E-02 1.60E-01 2.50E-01 3.60E-01 4.90E-01 6.40E-01 8.10E-01

0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90

Probability of Exposure

Risk Control

Education, Information, Tranning.

Administrative Procedures and Trainning.

Administrative and Trainning, Personal Protective Equipment.

Substitution, Personal Protective Equipment, Engineering Actions.

Engineering Actions, Substitution, Possible Elimination.

Elimination and Engineering Actions.

Home

G30
Risiko Technik: Elimination is a permanent solution and should be attempted in the first instance. Substitution involves replacing the hazard or environmental aspect by one of lower risk. Engineering controls involve physical barriers or structural changes to the environment or process. Administrative controls reduce hazard by altering procedures and providing instructions. Personal Protective Equipment is the last resort or temporary control.
Page 21: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Probability of Occurence

1.00

1.00E-02 0.01L

oss

Cri

tica

lity

Rat

io

2.00E-02 0.02

3.00E-02 0.03

4.00E-02 0.04

5.00E-02 0.05

6.00E-02 0.06

7.00E-02 0.07

8.00E-02 0.08

9.00E-02 0.09

1.00E-01 0.10

2.00E-01 0.20

3.00E-01 0.30

4.00E-01 0.40

5.00E-01 0.50

6.00E-01 0.60

7.00E-01 0.70

8.00E-01 0.80

9.00E-01 0.90

1.00E+00 1.00

1.00

Probability of Exposure

Page 22: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION

Firm: Risiko Technik Gruppe

Activity: Safety Engineering Code: 3210

Address: Rua Parque de Jogos, 357, Bloco A, 2 CF

Zip Code: 400001 Country: Portugal

Location: São Mamede

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY INFORMATION

Equity: 5,000,000.00 Social Security Tax: 22.00%

Assets: 3,500,000.00 IRS Tax: 11.00%

Total Liability: 750,000.00

Short-term Liability: 250,000.00

Long-term Liability: 500,000.00

Operational Results: 1,500,000.00

Net Results (Profit): 500,000.00

Employees: 750

Days per Year: 365

Days Worked per Week: 6

Vacation Days per Year: 22

Hollydays per Year: 5

Hours Worked per Day: 8.00

Total Absenteeism Days: 15.00

Number of Workers Disable: 3

Average Hourly Wage: 6.50

Total Days Worked per Year: 281

Annual Total Hours Worked: 1,685,143

Avgerage Absenteeism Days: 5

Total Worked Hours Lost: 120

Yearly Total Gross Wage: 10,953,428.57 Yearly Total Net Wage: 8,543,674.29

Page 23: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

INJURY AND ILLNESS INFORMATION

Accidents: 10

Percentage (%)

Incidents: 17 By Case By Worker

Cases of Injuries / Illness: 9 90.00% 1.20%

Cases of Permanent Disability: 2 20.00% 0.27%

Cases of Temporary Disability: 7 70.00% 0.93%

Cases of Deaths: 1 10.00% 0.13%

ECONOMIC SAFETY RATIO ANALYSIS

Total Safety Costs to Operational Results 1.28%

Total Safety Costs to Liquid Results 3.85%

Total Safety Costs to Equity 0.39%

Total Safety Costs to Short-term Liability 7.70%

Total Safety Costs to Long-term Liability 3.85%

Total Safety Costs per Employer 25.68

Injury and Illness Cost per Employer 5.00

Total Safety Costs 19,260.00

Home

Page 24: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

SAFETY AND HEALTH YEARLY COSTS

Days Average

Spent Cost per Day Amount %

Safety and Health Management

Extra work time:

+ direct personnel 5 350.00 1,750.00 9.09%

+ management 2 500.00 1,000.00 5.19%

+ specialists 2 300.00 600.00 3.12%

External safety and health services 5 1,000.00 5,000.00 25.96%

Global protective equipment 0.00

Personal protective equipment 0.00

Substitution products 0.00

Internal activities:

+ promotion 1 10.00 10.00 0.05%

+ training 5 300.00 1,500.00 7.79%

Total Management Costs 9,860.00 51.19%

Subsidies and compensations 0.00

Net Management Costs 9,860.00 51.19%

Safety and Health Related Costs

Work related absenteeism 2 50.00 100.00 0.52%

Personnel turnover 0.00

Administrative overhead 0.00

Legal costs:

+ fines 0.00

+ indemnities 0.00

+ legal expenses 0.00

Damage equipment 1 500.00 500.00 2.60%

Damage materials 0.00

Investigation and inspection 2 150.00 300.00 1.56%

Effect on insurance premiums 0.00

Total Safety Related Costs 4,650.00 24.14%

Compensation from insurance 0.00

Net Safety Related Costs 4,650.00 24.14%

Company Performance

Production effects:

+ lost production 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 10.38%

+ orders lost 0.00

+ market lost 0.00

Page 25: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Quality effects:

+ rework 1 2,000.00 2,000.00 10.38%

+ repairs 1 750.00 750.00 3.89%

+ rejection 0.00

+ warranties 0.00

Operational effects 0.00

Intangible effects:

+ attractiveness to potential customers 0.00

+ attractiveness to personnel 0.00

+ innovative capacity 0.00

Total Effects on Company 4,750.00 24.66%

Yearly Total of Safety and Health Costs 19,260.00

Page 26: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

ANNUAL COSTS, COST SAVINGS, AND ADDITIONAL INC INVESTMENT IN INITIAL EXPENDITURES

Amount

Productivity Planning

Production 1,500,000.00 Consultancy costs

Downtime reduction Engineering

Less balance losses 50,000.00 Internal activities

Less stocks 500,000.00

Other, to be specified Investments

Buildings, dwellings, foundations

Personnel Costs Land property

Safety and health services 6,000.00 Machines

Savings due to reduction in staffing Test equipment

Temporary replacement Transportation equipment

Turnover costs Facilities, work environment

Recruitment Workplaces

Overhead reduction

Sick leave costs Removals

Absenteeism Equipment

Effects on premiums Transportation

Other, to be specified

Personnel

Maintenance Costs of dismissal

Cost changes Recruitment

Other, to be specified Training

Other, to be specified

Preliminary Costs

Facilities and Material Usage Loss of quality

Cost changes of use of property 100,000.00 Additional wages (overtime)

Heat ventilation 500,000.00 Materials

Lighting 270,000.00 Additional operations

Electric power 700,000.00 Organisational activities

Steam 60,000.00 Production losses, downtime

Compressed air 40,000.00

Changes in material usage Incidental Income

Waste and disposal costs 150,000.00 Sales of redundant production equipment

Other, to be specified Sales of other equipment

Quality Total of Initial Investment

Changes in the amount of rework

Production losses

Price changes due to quality

Other, to be specified

Total 124,000.00

CASH FLOW TABLE

Planning 78,000.00

Investments 0.00

Removals 0.00

Personnel 5,500.00

Preliminary Costs 0.00

Incidental Income 50,000.00

Productivity 1,950,000.00

Personnel Costs 6,000.00

Maintenance 0.00

Page 27: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Facilities and Material Usage 1,820,000.00

Quality 0.00

Total 90,500.00

Home

Page 28: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

INVESTMENT IN INITIAL EXPENDITURES

Amount %

25,000.00 74.63%

50,000.00 149.25%

3,000.00 8.96%

500.00 1.49%

5,000.00 14.93%

50,000.00 149.25%

33,500.00

Page 29: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 30: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 31: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

COST OF INJURIES AND ILLNESS (YEARLY VALUES)

Amount %

Fatalities

Legal expenses

Insurance payments

Other payments

Subsidies

Fines

Absenteeism

Lost work time 3,000.00 80.00%

Lost production

Replacement

Recruitment 500.00 13.33%

Lost of flexibility

Wages of time spent 250.00 6.67%

Personnel

Retirement

Temporary disability

Savings due to reducing in staffing

Personnel turnover

Overtime payments

Replacement costs

Productivity loss

Recruitment procedures

Advertisements

Training

Non-medical Rehabilitation

Counselling

Training

Workplace adjustments

Wages of time spent

Safety and Health Services

Consultancy services

Cleaning up and disposal

Protective equipment

Special equipment

Fire brigades

Medical services

Other, to be specified

Medical and Healthcare

Transportation

Medicalcare services

Healthcare services

First-aid treatment

Hospitalisation

Other, to be specified

Equipment

Damage equipment

Repair costs

Replacement costs

Production

Page 32: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Production lost

Services not delivery

Insurance

Insurance premiums

Labor premiums

Healthcare premiums

Life premiums

Social responsability premiums

Additional insurance premim cost

Opportunity Costs

Orders lost

Competitiveness lost

Market share lost

Income lost

Aministrative Management

Injury investigations

Management time

External costs

Workplace assessments

Wages of time spent

Legal Costs

Legal expenses

Fines

Penalties, indemnities

Fees

Other, to be specified

Financial Costs

Non-realised profit

Liabilities

Asset depreciation

Interest payment

Total 3,750.00

Home

Page 33: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 34: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 35: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 36: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 37: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 38: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 39: QuantRiskMethod(4D)
Page 40: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

I. POLICY - PART 1: Accountability Arrangements

Does the organisation have a documented safety and health policy?

Is the safety and health policy signed off by the Chief Executive or his/her designate?

Is safety and health effectively integrated into the organisations strategic plan?

Are reporting relationships clearly defined in the organisation?

Are managers, supervisors and employees made aware of their responsibilities with regard to safety and health?

Do managers, supervisors and employees have a clear understanding of their responsibilities with regard to safety and health?

Are managers, supervisors and employees accountable for not meeting their responsibilities for workplace safety and health?

Are safety and health responsibilities detailed in the job descriptions of managers, supervisors and employees?

Has management ensured that adequate resources are provided to ensure that protective and preventive measures are in place to manage safety and health?

Is safety and health an agenda at management team meetings?

Are safety and health objectives incorporated as part of the safety and health policy?

Does the safety and health policy express a clear commitment to the safety of employees, service users, contractors and visitors?

Do the management team have a mechanism in place to facilitate planning, implementation, monitoring, control and consultation processes required for effective safety and health management?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 13 points)

Average Percentage

II. POLICY - PART 2: Safety Statement

Does the organisation have a documented safety and health policy?

Has the content of the safety statement been brought to the attention of all employees at least annually?

Is there a revision history of the safety statement to reflect evidence of regular review and update?

Does the safety statement include a review mechanism, which recognises the need to monitor and review performance?

Is there a clear commitment in the safety statement to allocate appropriate resources to manage safety and health?

Does the safety statement specify the process in place for identifying hazards, assessing risks, implementing controls and review?

Does the safety statement state the means by which information on safety and health is communicated to all employees?

Does the safety statement specify the arrangements in which the safety, health & welfare of employees are secured and managed?

Does the safety statement specify the arrangements in which the safety, health & welfare of other persons are secured and managed?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 9 points)

Average Percentage

III. POLICY - PART 3: Monitoring Legal Compliance

Is there a procedure to keep updated on safety and health legislation, codes of practice, and other relevant safety and health guidance?

Is there a regular review carried out to ensure appropriate legislation is available and up to date?

Is there evidence of monitoring compliance with statutory requirements?

Is there evidence of a process for systematically inspecting premises, plant, equipment and substances?

Is there evidence of health surveillance to check the effectiveness of control measures?

Is there follow up to HSA inspection reports/enforcement notices?

Are HSA inspector’s reports available (if conducted over the last year)?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 7 points)

Average Percentage

IV. POLICY - PART 4: Competent Persons

Are there sufficient competent persons to provide safety, health and welfare assistance to the organisation?

Is there a competent person appointed to oversee emergency planning within the organisation?

Are there an adequate number of employees trained to implement emergency plans within the organisation?

Page 41: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Where required, are there an adequate number of occupational first-aiders in the organisation?

Are there competent persons to manage/advise on safety and health in the following?

Are arrangements in place for ensuring adequate co-operation between the competent persons?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 6 points)

Average Percentage

V. PLANNING - PART 1: Consultation

Is there a mechanism in place for consultation on safety, health and welfare?

Does the employer consult with his/her employees on safety, health and welfare?

Does the employer consider representations from employees on safety, health and welfare?

Does management evaluate the effectiveness of its safety, health and welfare consultative processes?

Is there a committee in place to ensure effective consultation on safety, health and welfare matters?

Is there balanced participation on this committee?

Are there clearly defined safety, health and welfare terms of reference for the committee?

Is there evidence of follow up to actions decided at the meetings of the committee within a responsible time frame?

Do all employees have access to the minutes of committee meetings?

Is there evidence that the committee operates in accordance with its terms of reference?

Is the safety representative a member of the committee?

Is there a mechanism in place for the appointment of a safety representative(s)?

Has a safety representative been appointed?

Has the safety representative received appropriate training?

Is the role of the safety representative(s) understood by all?

Is the safety representative(s) allowed to perform and discharge his/her representative functions?

Is the safety representative(s) provided with adequate time to perform and discharge his/her representative functions?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 17 points)

Average Percentage

VI. PLANNING - PART 2: Communication

Is there an effective communication procedure set out in the safety statement?

Are employees knowledgeable about the safety and health management system?

Are managers aware of their safety and health role and responsibilities?

Are managers role and responsibilities for safety and health communicated to them formally?

Are employees roles and responsibilities for safety and health communicated to them formally?

Are employees made aware of relevant safety and health accountability arrangements?

Are the relevant safety and health policies and procedures communicated to employees?

Is there a mechanism in place for informing employees of revisions and amendments to policies and procedures?

Are employees aware of revisions and amendments to policies and procedures?

Are policies and procedures easily accessible at the workplace?

Are the results of a risk assessment communicated to relevant employees?

Is there evidence that employees understand the content of the risk assessment(s)?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 12 points)

Average Percentage

VII. PLANNING - PART 3: Instruction, Training and Supervision

Is safety and health training made available for all employees?

Are all employees aware of their duties to attend safety and health training?

Are employees released from their duties to attend safety and health training?

Is non-attendance at training programmes recorded/managed?

Is there a training needs analysis carried out for all employees?

Do all employees understand the training/instruction provided?

Page 42: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Do all employees understand the limitations and uses of personal protective equipment?

Is there a training programme in place?

Does management ensure the implementation of the training programme?

Are training programmes evaluated?

Are training records maintained?

Is there a system for flagging refresher training?

Is this refresher training provided?

Is there a formal induction program for all new employees?

Is safety and health adequately addressed in this induction program?

Is there a mechanism in place to ensure that those providing training are competent?

Is there evidence of manager support for training?

Are employees given instruction, training and supervision in a form, manner and as appropriate, language that is reasonably likely to be understood by the employee?

Is instruction, training and supervision provided to employees in the following situations:

• recruitment

• transfer

• change of task

• on the introduction of new work equipment

• changes in work equipment or systems of work

• introduction of new technology

Is there adequate supervision in place to ensure the safety and health of employees?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 25 points)

Average Percentage

VIII. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 1: Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment

Is there an adequate system in place for carrying out hazard identification and risk assessment?

Have appropriate employees been trained to carry out hazard identification and risk assessment?

Have employees been consulted as part of the process of risk assessment?

Does the organisation refer to the principles of prevention, (see Guidance Document) when deciding on the most appropriate control measures?

Are the control measures documented in the risk assessment being implemented?

Is there a review carried out to ensure that control measures are effective?

Does management have a thorough understanding of the hazards in the workplace?

Is there a system in place to ensure that a risk assessment is carried out when purchasing new materials or equipment or implementing new processes?

Is there a system in place to ensure that a risk assessment is carried out when implementing/introducing non-routine tasks, materials or equipment?

Are timescales clearly defined for each action identified as part of the risk assessment process?

Where required by regulations, have mandatory risk assessments been carried out, e.g. manual handling, display screen equipment, chemical agents, biological agents, pregnant employees, carcinogens, noise etc.?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 11 points)

Average Percentage

IX. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 2: Service User Safety

Is there evidence that the risk assessment process takes account of risks to service users?

Are the control measures, for service user safety, documented in the risk assessment being implemented?

Is there a review carried out to ensure that these control measures are effective?

Does management have a thorough understanding of the hazards to service users?

Is there a system for adverse event and near miss reporting for service users?

Have service users a means of bringing safety and health issues to the attention of management for action?

Where there is a risk, are service users informed of workplace hazards?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 7 points)

Average Percentage

X. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 3: Public Safety

Page 43: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Is there evidence that the risk assessment process takes account of risks to the public?

Are the control measures, for public safety, documented in the risk assessment being implemented?

Is there a review carried out to ensure that these control measures are effective?

Does management have a thorough understanding of the hazards to members of the public?

Is there a system for adverse event and near miss reporting for members of the public?

Are appropriate measures in place to address the potential risks to the public from the following hazards? (This is a non exhaustive list):

• access routes

• evacuation procedure

• lifts used by the public

• traffic control

• infection control

• environmental tobacco smoke

Have the public a means of bringing safety and health issues to the attention of management for action?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 12 points)

Average Percentage

XI. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 4: Co-ordination and co-operation with Contractors and Others

When selecting onsite contractors, does the organisation evaluate the contractor’s safety and health performance?

Is there a formal process for controlling contractors who work on site?

Is there a responsible person identified for liasing with the contractor(s)?

Are arrangements in place to provide contractors with safety and health information prior to commencing work?

Are risk assessments obtained, from contractors, for work being carried out on site?

Are method statements obtained, from contractors, for work being carried out on site?

Are arrangements in place to review risk assessments and method statements received from contractors?

Are arrangements in place to ensure ongoing consultation with contractors on safety and health related issues?

Are arrangements in place to ensure co-operation between contractors?

Are safety statements available for all contractors working on site?

Is the contractor(s) safety statement brought to the attention of all who may be affected by their activities while working on the premises?

Are relevant sections of the organisations safety and health statement brought to the attention of contractors and others working on site?

Are relevant sections of the organisations safety and health statement brought to the attention of employment agencies who provide agency and relief staff?

Are arrangements in place for the reporting and reviewing of incidents involving contractors?

Are relevant employees notified that a contractor is coming on site?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 15 points)

Average Percentage

XII. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 5: Safety, Health and Welfare Procedures

Is there a system in place to produce and manage policies and procedures?

Are relevant employees involved in the development of the policies and procedures?

Are there adequate policies in place for the following? (This is a non exhaustive list):

• selection of personal protective equipment

• management of moving and handling

• pregnant workers

• use of hazardous chemicals

• infection control

• occupational health services

• cleaning

• biological agents

• carcinogens

• transport

• reporting of incidents

Are policies and procedures brought to the attention of relevant employees?

Are policies and procedures reviewed?

Where required, are policies and procedures updated after review?

Page 44: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 16 points)

Average Percentage

XIII. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 6: Occupation Health Services

Is there a policy in relation to the provision of occupational health services (OHS)?

Are occupational health services available?

Do all employees have access to occupational health services where appropriate?

Is appropriate pre employment screening available to employees?

Is there a programme in place for the rehabilitation of employees?

Does the OHS advise on modifications to a job to facilitate an employee returning to work?

Is the requirement for health surveillance identified through risk assessment?

Does the organisation have specific objectives and targets for the OHS?

Are there clear lines of accountability for the OHS?

Is the service available during normal working hours?

Is the service available outside normal working hours?

Are appropriate facilities in place for the provision of the OHS?

Does the OHS advise on hazard identification and risk assessment where appropriate?

Does the OHS advise on fitness for work?

Does the OHS participate in relevant committees where appropriate?

Does the OHS work in conjunction with other disciplines in preventative safety and health management programmes where appropriate?

Does the OHS have access to employee accident and ill health records?

Is there a formal review of the effectiveness of OHS?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 11 points)

Average Percentage

XIV. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 7: Emergency Plans

Are competent persons appointed to oversee the development of emergency plans?

Are there emergency plans in place?

Are emergency plans communicated to employees?

Are competent persons nominated and trained to implement emergency plans?

Does management evaluate the effectiveness of the emergency plans?

Are suitable and effective plans and procedures in place for all foreseeable events of serious or imminent danger? (This is a non exhaustive list):

• fire

• water – no mains supply

• flooding

• power cut – electricity

• transportation

• burglary (vacant/occupied house)

• outbreak of illness e.g. winter vomiting bug, food poisoning etc.

• service user absconding

• major incident of challenging behaviour

Have a sufficient number of competent persons been nominated and trained to implement procedures relating to evacuation of people from the premises?

Is there liaison with the local fire authority in relation to the fire safety plan?

Are the emergency plans tested periodically?

Are there adequate first-aid arrangements in place?

Are all employees aware of arrangements in place for the provision of firstaid, including the location of equipment, facilities and personnel?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 19 points)

Average Percentage

XV. IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATION - PART 8: Adverse Events

Is there a policy and procedure in place for reporting incidents and near misses?

Page 45: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Is there an effective system in place for reviewing incidents and near misses?

Is safety and health effectively integrated into the organisations strategic plan?

Is there a system in place for the statutory reporting of incidents to the HSA?

Are trend analysis completed on injuries/ill health absence?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 5 points)

Average Percentage

XVI. MEASURING PERFORMANCE - PART 1: Key Performance Indicators

Does management have a set of agreed performance indicators in place to monitor safety and health performance?

Are the safety and health goals and objectives SMART (Specific, Measureable, Attainable, Relevant, Timebound)?

Is there a system in place to evaluate the effectiveness of performance indicators?

Does the organisation measure its progress towards the safety and health goals and objectives?

Is there evidence that key indicators are being used? (This is a non exhaustive list):

• percentage of attendance at mandatory training

• percentage of attendees at induction training within one month of appointment

• percentage of employees attending all safety and health training programmes including refresher training, as appropriate

• percentage of managers trained in risk assessment process

• number of 3 day incidents expressed as a percentage of total incidents reported

• number of incidents relating to employees, service users, contractors and members of the public expressed as a percentage of total incidents reported

• number of incident review recommendations implemented expressed as a percentage of total incident review recommendations

• trends in incidents

• number of proactive departmental risk assessments carried out, as a percentage of total number of departments in the organisation

• number of mandatory risk assessments carried out as a percentage of total number required, e.g. manual handling, display screen equipment, chemical agents, biological agents, pregnant employees, carcinogens, etc.

• percentage of control measures (identified in the hazard identification and risk assessment process) implemented, represented as a percentage of total number of control measures identified

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 15 points)

Average Percentage

XVII. REVIEWING PERFORMANCE - PART 1: Reviewing Performance

Is there a formal method in place for the periodic review of the safety and health management system?

Does the review cover all key elements of the safety and health management system?

Does the review of the safety and health management system involve all appropriate personnel?

Is there evidence that the organisation responded adequately to the recommendations in the most recent review of the system?

Are review meetings documented?

Are arrangements in place for ongoing review of the risk assessment process?

Is safety and health performance measured against internal key performance indicators?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 7 points)

Average Percentage

XVIII. AUDITING - PART 1: Audit

Does the organisation have a system in place for performing safety and health audits?

Is there a safety and health audit schedule in place?

Have appropriate employees been trained competently to carry internal audits?

Are external audits carried out by competent persons?

Are the findings of these audits recorded?

Are follow up actions of the audit signed off by an appropriate manager?

Does the auditing system critically appraise the key elements of the safety and health management system?

Are the results of audits fed back to senior management and relevant stakeholders to allow for corrective action?

Is there a system in place to ensure that the corrective actions resulting from an audit are implemented?

Subtotal Points (Number of total points: 9 points)

Page 46: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Average Percentage

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS (218 Points)

Policy (16.36 %)

Planning (25.23 %)

Implementation and Operation (45.79 %)

Measuring Performance (7.01 %)

Reviewing Performance (3.27 %)

Auditing (4.21 %)

Total Score (Total Possible Points: 218 Points | Percentage Coverage: 98.2%) :: The Management Performance is Positive

Home

Page 47: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Score

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

84.6%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

9

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

D5
Risiko Technik: 1 is the existence of the item. 0 is the absence of the item.
Page 48: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

1

1

1

6

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

17

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

12

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

Page 49: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

25

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

11

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

100.0%

Score

Page 50: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

12

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

15

100.0%

Score

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Page 51: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

14

87.5%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

18

100.0%

Score

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

14

73.7%

Score

1

Page 52: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

1

1

1

1

5

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

15

33.3%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

7

100.0%

Score

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

9

Page 53: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

100.0%

TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS (218 Points)

35

54

98

15

7

9

214

Page 54: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Risk OPERATIONAL MODE ANALYSIS HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

Code System Subsystem Function Mission Phase Element

RK0001 Operation. V-19

RK0002 Operation. Pump P-123

RK0003 Operation. L-12

RK0004 Operation. V-19

RK0005 Operation. T-23

RK0006 Operation. T-01

RK0007 Operation. V-23

RK0008 Operation. L-11

Home

Page 55: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

Hazard Description Deviation Status

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system. Low flow.

Loss of electrical power due to the inexistance of UPS unit. No flow.

Corrosion of pipeline system. Low pressure.

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system. Low flow.

Failure of the cooling unit. High temperature.

Isolation malfunction. Low temperature.

Lack of maintenance. Low pressure.

Corrosion of pipeline system. Low pressure.

Page 56: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

Failure Mode Causes

Seal leakage. Valve V-19 open.

Pump failure; loss of electrical power.

Line rupture.

Valve V-19 partially closed.

Hot weather.

Cold weather

External leakage. Valve seal leakage.

Line rupture. Chlorine flow to environment.

Page 57: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

Consequences

Loss of HF to B-1 process.

No chlorine flow to tower basin. Low chlorine concentration in tower basin.

HF release in area; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient HF supply to B-1 process.

Overpressure; HF release; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient vaporization.

Stream contamination.

Both internal pressure valves fail open and relief valve opens. Potential personnel injury due to exposure.

Page 58: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

COUNTERMEASURES

Saf

ety

Dev

ice

En

gin

eeri

ng

Saf

ety

Fea

ture

War

nin

g D

evic

e

Per

son

al P

rote

ctiv

e D

evic

e

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

ced

ure

s

Dis

pla

y o

r In

dic

ato

r

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION

Failure Effects Failure Detection Method

Producing toxic vapors and attacking nearby equipment. Unknown device.

Chlorination pump malfunction alarm. •Unknown device.

Local pressure indicator. •Local temperature indicator. •Local temperature indicator. •

Water on HF stream. Failure detection. •Chlorine released to environment. Distinctive odor.

Page 59: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

COUNTERMEASURES TARGETS

No

Dev

ice

Exi

sts

Per

son

nel

En

viro

nm

ent

Bu

sin

ess

Inte

rru

pti

on

Pro

du

ct

Pro

cess

Eq

uip

men

t

Th

ird

Par

ties

(e.

g. C

ust

om

er)

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE

Compliance Analysis Target

Standard Measured Deviation Units Compliance

• • • 3.00 2.00 233.33% Equipment.

• Process.

• • • Environment, Personnel.

• Process.

• • • Process, Personnel.

• •• •

• • •

Home

kg/m3

Page 60: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Risk

Code

RK0001

RK0002

RK0003

RK0004

RK0005

RK0006

RK0007

RK0008

Home

Page 61: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Hazard Description

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Loss of electrical power due to the inexistance of UPS unit.

Corrosion of pipeline system.

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Failure of the cooling unit.

Isolation malfunction.

Lack of maintenance.

Corrosion of pipeline system.

Page 62: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Consequences

Loss of HF to B-1 process.

No chlorine flow to tower basin. Low chlorine concentration in tower basin.

HF release in area; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient HF supply to B-1 process.

Overpressure; HF release; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient vaporization.

Stream contamination.

Both internal pressure valves fail open and relief valve opens. Potential personnel injury due to exposure.

Page 63: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

INJURY AND ILLNESS IDENTIFICATION TOXICOLOGICAL COMPLIANCE

Type of Injury Type of Illness Body Location Affected Standard Measured Deviation

Page 64: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Type of Consequence

Dea

th

Per

man

ent

Dis

abili

ty (

100%

)

Per

man

ent

Dis

abili

ty (

> 5

0%)

Per

man

ent

Dis

abili

ty (

< 5

0%)

Sev

ere

Illn

ess

Mo

der

ate

Illn

ess

Min

or

Inju

ry /

Illn

ess

FATALITY AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

Dea

th (

%)

TOXICOLOGICAL COMPLIANCE Number Number Disability Total

Units Deaths Accidents Days Fatalities

• • • • • 1 5 8 6 16.67%

• • • • • 1 2 5 3 33.33%

• • • • • 2 6 15 8 25.00%

kg/m3

AC14
Risiko Technik: In days.
Page 65: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

FATALITY AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS

Acc

iden

t (%

)

MEDICAL AND HEALTH COSTS

Disability Disability Duration Fatality Hospital First Medical

Injury Rate Duration Rate Rate Treatment Aid Care

83.33% 2.97E-06 1.90E-04 0.004% 3.56E-06 500.00 300.00

66.67% 1.19E-06 4.75E-05 0.002% 1.78E-06 100.00 260.00 120.00

75.00% 3.56E-06 4.27E-04 0.007% 4.75E-06 450.00 400.00

AJ14
Risiko Technik: Number of Accidents per number of Total Hours Worked.
AK14
Risiko Technik: Average value in Hours.
AL14
Risiko Technik: Number of Workdays Lost per number of Total Days Worked.
AN14
Risiko Technik: Number of Fatalities (+Deaths) per number of Total Hours Worked.
Page 66: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

WORK CASE

Inte

rnal

Su

bst

itu

tio

n

Rec

ruit

men

t

Job

Tra

nsf

er

Wo

rk R

estr

icti

on

Wo

rkp

lace

Mo

dif

icat

ion

Co

mp

uls

ory

Ret

irem

ent

Tem

po

rary

Su

bst

itu

tio

n

MEDICAL AND HEALTH COSTS Fatality

Medical Transportation Health Other Total Criticality

Treatment Locomotion Care Costs Cost Index

150.00 55.00 1,005.00 • • 1.37E-03

55.00 535.00 • 1.36E-03

279.00 86.00 1,215.00 • • 2.74E-03

Page 67: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Fatality

Probability

6.34E-12

1.78E-06

1.78E-17

Home

Page 68: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Risk

Code

RK0001

RK0002

RK0003

RK0004

RK0005

RK0006

RK0007

RK0008

Home

Page 69: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Hazard Description

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Loss of electrical power due to the inexistance of UPS unit.

Corrosion of pipeline system.

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Failure of the cooling unit.

Isolation malfunction.

Lack of maintenance.

Corrosion of pipeline system.

Page 70: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Consequences

Loss of HF to B-1 process.

No chlorine flow to tower basin. Low chlorine concentration in tower basin.

HF release in area; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient HF supply to B-1 process.

Overpressure; HF release; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient vaporization.

Stream contamination.

Both internal pressure valves fail open and relief valve opens. Potential personnel injury due to exposure.

Page 71: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

TARGETS LABOR EXPENSES AND COSTS

Per

son

nel

En

viro

nm

ent

Bu

sin

ess

Inte

rru

pti

on

Pro

du

ct

Pro

cess

Eq

uip

men

t

Th

ird

Par

ties

(e.

g. C

ust

om

er)

Wag

es a

nd

Sal

ary

Ove

rtim

e S

pen

din

g /

Co

sts

Pre

miu

m L

abo

r P

aym

ent

Sic

k an

d H

ealt

h P

aym

ents

Tra

inin

g a

nd

Info

rmat

ion

Wo

rlp

lace

Ad

apta

tio

n

Rec

ruit

men

t C

ost

s

Ret

irem

ent

Co

mp

ensa

tio

n

Medical

and Health

Costs

• ••

• • 1,005.00 50.00 100.00 25.00

•• • • 535.00 75.00 200.00 25.00

• •• •

• • 1,215.00 35.00 45.00 56.00 25.00

Page 72: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

LABOR EXPENSES AND COSTS QUALITY & PRODUCTION EXPENSES AND COSTS MARKET & PRODUCT EXPENSES AND COSTS

Insu

ran

ce P

rem

ium

Co

st

To

tal L

abo

r E

xpen

ses

/ Co

sts

Rew

ork

(p

rod

uct

)

Ou

tso

urc

ing

Pro

du

ctio

n

Pro

du

ctio

n L

oss

es (

Qu

alit

y)

Qu

alit

y A

dju

stm

ent

Ad

dit

ion

al M

ater

ials

Mat

eria

ls L

oss

es

To

tal Q

ual

ity

Co

sts

Sal

es /

Rev

enu

e L

ost

Cu

sto

mer

s / O

rder

s L

ost

Pri

ce lo

sses

/ ch

ang

e

0.00 2,000.00 750.00 2,750.00

0.00 0.00

15.00 190.00 750.00 750.00

0.00 320.00 320.00

50.00 350.00 560.00 560.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 540.00 540.00

25.00 186.00 0.00

Page 73: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

MARKET & PRODUCT EXPENSES AND COSTS ENERGY & UTILITIES EXPENSES AND COSTS SAFETY AND HEALTH EXPENSES AND COSTS

Mar

ket

Rep

uta

tio

n L

oss

es

Mar

ket

Insu

ran

ce P

rem

ium

To

tal M

arke

t / P

rod

uct

Co

sts

Hea

t an

d V

enti

lati

on

Lig

hti

ng

Ele

ctri

city

Air

Co

nd

itio

nin

g /

Co

olo

ing

Co

mp

ress

ed A

ir

Vap

or

Pro

du

ctio

n

Wat

er a

nd

Was

tew

ater

En

viro

nm

enta

l Co

sts

To

tal U

tilit

ies

Co

sts

Fin

es a

nd

Pen

alti

es

Fir

e / S

afet

y B

rig

ades

0.00 750.00 750.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 750.00 750.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

Page 74: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

SAFETY AND HEALTH EXPENSES AND COSTS LEGAL EXPENSES AND COSTS BUSINESS INTERRUPTION EXPENSES AND COSTS

Co

nsu

ltan

cy S

ervi

ces

Saf

ety

Eq

uip

men

t

Insp

ecti

on

an

d S

urv

ey

Inve

stig

atio

ns

Au

dit

s (i

nte

rnal

an

d e

xter

nal

)

Tra

inin

g, E

du

cati

on

To

tal O

SH

Co

sts

Leg

al E

xpen

ses

Co

nsu

ltac

y

Co

urt

s E

xpen

ses

Law

yers

an

d S

olic

ito

rs

Co

ntr

act

Pen

alti

es /

Fin

es

To

tal L

egal

Co

sts

Do

wn

tim

e C

ost

s

230.00 230.00 0.00

250.00 250.00 0.00

25.00 200.00 150.00 375.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

25.00 75.00 170.00 150.00 420.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

90.00 200.00 290.00 0.00

Page 75: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

BUSINESS INTERRUPTION EXPENSES AND COSTS PERMANENT REPLACEMENT EXPENSES AND COSTS

Ou

tpu

t / P

rod

uct

Lo

st

Mar

ket

Lo

st, O

rder

s L

ost

Ser

vice

s (O

uts

ou

rcin

g)

Em

erg

ency

Sh

utd

ow

n

Mai

nte

nan

ce C

ost

s

Rep

air

Co

sts

Su

bst

itu

tio

n (

Eq

uip

men

t)

Lay

ou

t C

han

ge

Co

sts

Sta

rt-u

p (

No

rmal

, Em

erg

ency

)

To

tal B

usi

nes

s In

terr

up

tio

n

Ch

ang

e in

Pri

ce o

f A

sset

s

Man

ufa

ctu

rin

g C

ost

Fre

igh

tin

g C

ost

Sh

ipp

ing

Co

st

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Page 76: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

PERMANENT REPLACEMENT EXPENSES AND COSTS TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT COSTS

Inst

alla

tio

n C

ost

Eq

uip

men

t an

d M

ach

iner

y

To

ols

an

d H

ard

war

e

Lo

st T

ime

for

Op

erat

ion

s

Pro

du

ctio

n D

elay

s

Tra

nsp

ort

atio

n

Raw

Mat

eria

ls C

ost

Pro

per

ty (

bu

ildin

gs,

lan

d)

Pla

nt

and

Fac

iliti

es

Cle

anin

g U

p S

ite

Insu

ran

ce P

rem

ium

Ove

rco

st

To

tal P

erm

aneb

t R

epla

cem

ent

Lea

se

Ren

tal

75.00 75.00

125.00 125.00

350.00 350.00

85.00 85.00

750.00 125.00 875.00

0.00

270.00 270.00 540.00

600.00 900.00 ###

Page 77: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

TEMPORARY REPLACEMENT COSTS LOST INCOME INSURANCE COMPENSATION AND INDEMNITY

Fin

anci

al

Ou

tso

urc

ing

Insu

ran

ce P

rem

ium

Ove

rco

st

To

tal R

epla

cem

ent

Co

sts

Inve

stm

ent

and

Cap

ital

RO

R (

ann

ual

rat

e)

Tim

e o

f In

vest

men

t (d

ays)

To

tal L

ost

Inco

me

Lab

or

and

Lif

e In

sura

nce

Lan

d a

nd

Pro

per

ty

Leg

al C

om

pen

sati

on

Fin

anci

al C

om

pen

sati

on

Med

ical

an

d H

ealt

hca

re

0.00 3,805.00 10.42

0.00 375.00 1.03

0.00 3,420.00 3.00% 90 25.30 375.00 150.00

0.00 405.00 1.11

0.00 2,740.00 3.00% 90 20.27 300.00 120.00

0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 1,080.00 2.96

0.00 3,191.00 3.00% 90 23.60 200.00 130.00

Page 78: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

INSURANCE COMPENSATION AND INDEMNITY

LO

SS

CR

ITIC

AL

ITY

VA

LU

E

LO

SS

CR

ITIC

AL

ITY

RA

TIO

Th

ird

par

ties

To

tal i

nsu

ran

ce in

dem

nit

y

0.00 3,815.42 0.076%

0.00 376.03 0.008%

525.00 2,920.30 0.058%

0.00 406.11 0.008%

420.00 2,340.27 0.047%

0.00 0.00

0.00 1,082.96 0.022%

330.00 2,884.60 0.058%

Page 79: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Risk OPERATIONAL MODE ANALYSIS

Code System Subsystem Function Mission Phase

RK0001 Operation.

RK0002 Operation.

RK0003 Operation.

RK0004 Operation.

RK0005 Operation.

RK0006 Operation.

RK0007 Operation.

RK0008 Operation.

Home

Page 80: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

TARGETS

Per

son

nel

En

viro

nm

ent

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Hazard Description

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Loss of electrical power due to the inexistance of UPS unit.

Corrosion of pipeline system. • •Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Failure of the cooling unit. •Isolation malfunction.

Lack of maintenance.

Corrosion of pipeline system. • •

Page 81: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

TARGETS

Bu

sin

ess

Inte

rru

pti

on

Pro

du

ct

Pro

cess

Eq

uip

men

t

Th

ird

Par

ties

(e.

g. C

ust

om

er)

OCCURENCE ANALYSIS EXPOSURE ANALYSIS

Events Amplitude Lifetime Rate Probability Events Amplitude

n t n

• • 1.0 1.00 100.00 1.00E-02 9.90E-03 1.0 1.00

• 1.0 1.00 3.00 3.33E-01 2.39E-01 1.0 1.00

1.0 1.00 3,000.00 3.33E-04 3.33E-04 1.0 1.00

• 1.0 1.00 1,200.00 8.33E-04 8.33E-04 1.0 1.00

• • 1.0 1.00 2,000.00 5.00E-04 5.00E-04 1.0 1.00

• • 1.0 1.00 2,000.00 5.00E-04 5.00E-04 1.0 1.00

• • 1.0 1.00 4,000.00 2.50E-04 2.50E-04 1.0 1.00

1.0 1.00 2,200.00 4.55E-04 4.54E-04 1.0 1.00

Dt loc Poc Dt

Page 82: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

EXPOSURE ANALYSIS Loss Risk Risk

Lifetime Rate Probability Reliability Criticality Index Uncertainty

t a u

100.00 1.00E-02 9.90E-03 9.90E-01 3,815.42 3.78E-01 2.57E-05

50.00 2.00E-02 1.96E-02 9.22E-01 376.03 1.91E+00 1.30E-04

500.00 2.00E-03 2.00E-03 9.99E-01 2,920.30 1.94E-03 1.32E-07

600.00 1.67E-03 1.66E-03 9.99E-01 406.11 5.63E-04 3.84E-08

1,000.00 1.00E-03 9.99E-04 9.99E-01 2,340.27 1.17E-03 7.97E-08

1,000.00 1.00E-03 9.99E-04 9.99E-01 0.00 NA NA

750.00 1.33E-03 1.33E-03 9.99E-01 1,082.96 3.61E-04 2.46E-08

6,000.00 1.67E-04 1.67E-04 1.00E+00 2,884.60 2.18E-04 1.49E-08

NUMBER LEVEL 7 7

TOTAL VALUES 2.2925 1.56E-04

MEAN VALUES 4.95E-03 4.54E-08

STANDARD DEVIATION 7.12E-01 4.85E-05

UNCERTAINTY CONFIDENCE 3.37E-07

loc Poc Kc Ri

Page 83: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Risk Risk

Class Category

V High

VI Extreme

IV Significant

III Moderate

III Moderate

NA NA

III Moderate

III Moderate

Home

Page 84: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Risk OPERATIONAL MODE ANALYSIS

Code System Subsystem Function Mission Phase

RK0001 Operation.

RK0002 Operation.

RK0003 Operation.

RK0004 Operation.

RK0005 Operation.

RK0006 Operation.

RK0007 Operation.

RK0008 Operation.

Home

Page 85: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Hazard Description

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Loss of electrical power due to the inexistance of UPS unit.

Corrosion of pipeline system.

Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system.

Failure of the cooling unit.

Isolation malfunction.

Lack of maintenance.

Corrosion of pipeline system.

Page 86: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Failure Mode Causes

Seal leakage. Valve V-19 open.

Pump failure; loss of electrical power.

Line rupture.

Valve V-19 partially closed.

Hot weather.

Cold weather

External leakage. Valve seal leakage.

Line rupture. Chlorine flow to environment.

Page 87: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Consequences

Loss of HF to B-1 process.

No chlorine flow to tower basin. Low chlorine concentration in tower basin.

HF release in area; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient HF supply to B-1 process.

Overpressure; HF release; possible injuries or fatalities.

Insufficient vaporization.

Stream contamination.

Both internal pressure valves fail open and relief valve opens. Potential personnel injury due to exposure.

Page 88: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

TARGETS

Per

son

nel

En

viro

nm

ent

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

Failure Effects Failure Detection Method

Producing toxic vapors and attacking nearby equipment. Unknown device.

Chlorination pump malfunction alarm.

Unknown device. • •Local pressure indicator.

Local temperature indicator. •Local temperature indicator.

Water on HF stream. Failure detection.

Chlorine released to environment. Distinctive odor. • •

Page 89: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

TARGETS APPLICABLE COUNTERMEASURES APPLICABLE CONTROL MEASURES

Bu

sin

ess

Inte

rru

pti

on

Pro

du

ct

Pro

cess

Eq

uip

men

t

Th

ird

Par

ties

(e.

g. C

ust

om

er)

Saf

ety

Dev

ice

En

gin

eeri

ng

Saf

ety

Fea

ture

War

nin

g D

evic

e

Per

son

al P

rote

ctiv

e D

evic

e

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

ced

ure

s

Dis

pla

y o

r In

dic

ato

r

Ad

min

istr

ativ

e P

roce

du

res

Tra

inin

g a

nd

Ed

uca

tio

n

Saf

ety

Po

licy

Reg

ula

tory

Co

mp

lian

ce

Ru

les

and

Reg

ula

men

tati

on

Saf

ety

& H

ealt

h P

roce

du

res

Tec

hn

ical

Pro

ced

ure

s

Em

erg

ency

Pla

ns

/ Ser

vice

s

Co

nti

ng

ency

Pla

ns

Haz

ard

Iden

tifi

cati

on

Haz

ard

An

alys

is

• • • • • •• • •

• • • • •• • •• • • • • • • • •• • • • • •• • • • • •

• • • • •

Page 90: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

APPLICABLE CONTROL MEASURES

Qu

alit

ativ

e R

isk

An

alys

is

Qu

anti

tati

ve R

isk

An

alys

is

FM

EA

/ F

ME

CA

/ A

RM

Sfe

ty In

teg

rity

Lev

el (

SIL

)

Saf

ety

Cri

tica

l Ele

men

t (S

CE

A)

Saf

ety

/ Hea

lth

Su

per

visi

on

Insp

ecti

on

/ S

urv

eys

Lo

ss P

reve

nti

on

An

alys

is

Per

iod

ical

Au

dit

s

Fir

e S

afet

y / R

isk

An

alys

is

Rel

iab

ility

An

alys

is

Pro

cess

Haz

ard

An

alys

is

HA

ZO

P A

nal

ysis

(I &

II)

Pro

cess

Saf

ety

Man

agem

ent

Risk

Index Risk

Category

• • 3.78E-01 High

• 1.91E+00 Extreme

• 1.94E-03 Significant

• 5.63E-04 Moderate

• • 1.17E-03 Moderate

• • NA NA

• • 3.61E-04 Moderate

• 2.18E-04 Moderate

Home

Ri

Page 91: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

RECOMMENDATIONS / ACTIONS

Page 92: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

RISK ANALYSIS REPORT

Firm:

Risiko Technik Gruppe

Activity:

Safety Engineering

Address:

Rua Parque de Jogos, 357, Bloco A, 2 CF

Zip Code: 400001

Location: São Mamede

Country: Portugal

Data Information

Risk Risk

Code System Subsystem Function Risk Description Index

RK0001 Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system. 3.78E-01

RK0002 Loss of electrical power due to the inexistance of UPS unit. 1.91E+00

RK0003 Corrosion of pipeline system. 1.94E-03

RK0004 Flange Seal A-29 leakage by damage, releasing pressurized chemical from containment system. 5.63E-04

RK0005 Failure of the cooling unit. 1.17E-03

RK0006 Isolation malfunction. NA

RK0007 Lack of maintenance. 3.61E-04

RK0008 Corrosion of pipeline system. 2.18E-04

Total Risk: 2.2925 Average Risk Index: 4.95E-03

Page 93: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

Standard Deviation: 7.12E-01 Global Uncertainty: #REF!

Page 94: QuantRiskMethod(4D)

RISK ANALYSIS REPORT

Risk

Category

High

Extreme

Significant

Moderate

Moderate

NA

Moderate

Moderate


Recommended