Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lillie-webb |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Quantum Coherent Nanoelectromechanics
Robert Shekhter
Leonid Gorelik and Mats Jonson
*
University of Gothenburg / Heriot-Watt University / Chalmers Univ. of Technology
In collaboration with:
• Mechanically assisted superconductivity• NEM-induced electronic Aharonov-Bohm effect• Supercurrent-driven nanomechanics
H. Park et al., Nature 407, 57 (2000)
Quantum ”bell” Single-C60 transistor
A. Erbe et al., PRL 87, 96106 (2001);
Nanoelectromechanical Devices
V. Sazonova et al., Nature 431, 284 (2004)B. J. LeRoy et al., Nature 432, 371 (2004)
CNT-based nanoelectromechanical devices
Nanomechanical Shuttling of Electrons
bias voltage dissipation
curr
entGorelik et al, Phys Rev Lett 1998
Shekhter et al., J Comp Th Nanosc 2007 (review)
H.S.Kim, H.Qin, R.Blick, arXiv:0708.1646 (experiment)
How does mechanics contribute to tunneling of Cooper pairs?
Is it possible to maintain a mechanically-assisted supercurrent?
Gorelik et al. Nature 2001; Isacsson et al. PRL 89, 277002 (2002)
To preserve phase coherence only few degrees of freedom must be involved.
This can be achieved provided:
• No quasiparticles are produced
• Large fluctuations of the charge are suppressed by the Coulomb blockade:
CJ EE
Single-Cooper-Pair Box
Coherent superposition of two “nearby” charge states [2n and 2(n+1)] can be created by choosing a proper
gate voltage which lifts the Coulomb Blockade,
Nakamura et al., Nature 1999
Movable Single-Cooper-Pair Box
Josephson hybridization is produced at the trajectory turning points since near these points the Coulomb
blockade is lifted by the gates.
Possible setup configurations
A supercurrent flows between two leads kept at a fixed phase difference
H
LnRn
Coherence between isolated remote leads
created by “shuttling” of Cooper pairs
I: Shuttling between coupled superconductors
22
,
.0
( )2
2 ( )
ˆ( ) cos ( )
( ) exp
C J
C
sJ J s
s L R
L RJ
H H H
e Q xH n
C x e
H E x
xE x E
0
Louville-von Neumann equationDynamics:
, ( )i H Ht
Relaxation suppresses the memory of initial conditions.
How does it work?
0 0
Between the leads Coulomb degeneracy is lifted producing
an additional "electrostatic" phase shift
(1) (0)dt E E
0Average current in units as a function of
electrostatic, , and superconducting, , phases
2I ef
Black regions – no current. The current direction is indicated by signs
Distribution of phase differences as a function of number of rotations. Suppression of quantum fluctuations of
phase difference
Quantum Nanomechanical Interferometer
Classical interferometer(two “classical” holes ina screen)
Quantum nanomechanicalInterferometer (“quantum”holes determined bya wavefunction)
Interferencedeterminesthe intensity
(Analogy applies for the elastic transport channel; need to add effects of inelastic scattering)
Model
, ,e m
L R L R
H H H H T
, ,H a a
22
3 { ( ) ( ) ( , ) ( ) ( )}2e
ieH d r r A r U y u x z r r
m r c
22 2
22
1 ( )( )
2
L
m L
u xH dx x EI
x
Renormalization of Electronic Tunneling
iS iSH e He
3
0
( )( ) ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( )
xr eHS i d r u x r i dx u x r r
y c
2
0
exp ( )
L
L LR R
eHT T i dxu x
c
Coupling to the Fundamental Bending Mode
Only one vibration mode is taken into account
142 2
0 0 00
ˆ ˆˆ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 ; Lu x Y u x b b Y EI
CNT is considered as a complex scatterer for electrons tunneling from one metallic lead to the other
Theoretical Model • Strong longitudinal quantization of
electrons on the CNT• Perturbative approach to resonant
tunneling though the quantized levels (only virtual localization of electrons
on the CNT is possible)
Effective Hamiltonian
ˆ ˆ( ), , , ,
, ,
ˆ ˆ ( . )2
i b beff R LH a a b b T e a a h c
0 0/ 2gHLY 0 02Y M L *
L Reff
T TT E
Amplitude of quantum oscillations [about 0.01 nm]
Magnetic-flux dependenttunneling
Linear Conductance(The vibrational subsystem is assumed to be in equilibrium)
1,4exp2
0
2
0
TkG
G
B
1,3
41
2
0
2
0
TkTk
h
G
G
BB
ehcHgLY /. 00
For L=1 m, = 108 Hz, T = 30 mK and H = 20-40 T we estimate G/G0 = 1-3%
The most striking feature is the temperature dependence. It comes from the dynamics of the entire nanotube, not from the electrondynamics R.I. Shekhter et al., PRL 97 (2006)
n
n
movablenonbacknback WWW
Backscattering of Electrons due to the Presence of Fullerene.
The probability of backscattering sums up all backscattering channels.The result yields classical formula for non-movable target.
However the sum rule does not apply as Pauli principle puts restrictions on allowed transitions .
×
The applied bias voltage selects the allowed inelastic transitions through vibrating nanowire as fermionic nature of electrons has to be considered.
Pauli Restrictions on Allowed Transitions Through Vibrating Nanowire
Different Types of NEM Coupling
• Capacitive coupling
• Tunneling coupling
• Shuttle coupling
• Inductive coupling
C(x)
R(x)
C(x) R(x)
Lorentz forcefor given j
Electromotive force at I = 0for given v
j
FL
E
v
H .
Electronically Assisted NanomechanicsFrom the ”shuttle instability” we know that electronic and mechanicaldegrees of freedom couple strongly at the nanometre scale. So wemay ask....
Can a coherent flow of electrons drive nanomechanics?
• Does a Superconducting Nanoelectromechanical Single-Electron Transistor (NEM-SSET) have a shuttle instability?
- This is an open question
• Electronic Aharonov-Bohm effect induced by quantum vibrations: Can resonantly tunneling electrons in a B-field drive nanomechanics?
- This is an open question
• Can a supercurrent drive nanomechanics?
- Yes! Topic for the rest of this talk
Supercurrent-Driven Nanomechanics
)sin( cHLJkuuum
)/]2[2()/2( uHLeeV
)(2 tuVjdc
Model: Driven, damped nonlinear oscillator G. Sonne et al. arXiv:0806.4680
Driving Lorentz force
Induced el.motive force
Energy balance in stationary regimedetermines time-averaged dc supercurrent
Compare:
NEM resonator as part of a SQUID
Buks, Blencowe PRB 2006Zhou, Mizel PRL 2006 Blencowe, Buks PRB 2007Buks et al. EPL 2008
Giant Magnetoresistance
V
Alternating Josephson current
Mechanical resonances
Alternating Lorentz force, FL
)/2cos()( ]/4[)/2sin(
)/)(4/2sin(22
eVttuJLeHeVtHLJ
teHLueVtHLJF
cc
cL
Force (I) leads to resonance at
Force (II) leads to parametric resonance at
(I) (II)
/2eV
2/2 eV
Accumulation and dissipation of a finite amount of energy during oneeach nanowire oscillation period means that andTherefore a nonzero average (dc) supercurrent on resonance
0)( tjVW
For small amplitudes (u):
Giant Magnetoresistance
V
Alternating Josephson current
Mechanical resonances
Alternating Lorentz force, FL
)/2cos()( ]/4[)/2sin(
)/)(4/2sin(22
eVttuILeHeVtHLI
teHLueVtHLIF
cc
cL
Force (I) leads to resonance at
Force (II) leads to parametric resonance at
(I) (II)
/2eV
2/2 eV
Accumulation and dissipation of a finite amount of energy during each nanowire oscillation period means that andtherefore a nonzero average (dc) supercurrent on resonance
0)( tIVW
Giant Magnetoresistance
The onset of the parametric resonance depends on magnetic field H. By increasing H the resistance jumps from to a finite value.
)(/ tjVR R
dc bias voltagedc bias voltage
Am
plitu
de o
f w
ire o
scill
atio
ns
Parametric resonanceResonance
”small” H
”larger” H
Superconductive Pumping of Nanovibrations
Mathematical formulation
)8/()( ;/
/2~
;/~)( )/4(
2220
20 cJeLmHHH
eVVm
tueLHY
Introduce dimensionless variables:
Equation of motion for the nanowire:
)~
sin(~ YtVYYY
(Forced, damped, nonlinear oscillator)
1000~/1 and mT, 20 ,nA 100 ,μm 1for 1,~ QHJL c
Realistic numbers for a SWNT wire makes both parameters small:
Superconductive Pumping of Nanovibrations
Mathematical formulation
)8/()( ;/
/2~
;/~)( )/4(
2220
20 cJeLmHHH
eVVm
tueLHY
Introduce dimensionless variables:
Equation of motion for the nanowire:
)~
sin(~ YtVYYY
(Forced, damped, nonlinear oscillator)
1000~/1 and mT, 20 ,nA 100 ,μm 1for 1,~ QHJL c
Realistic numbers for a SWNT wire makes both parameters small:
Superconductive Pumping of Nanovibrations
Resonance approximation
)~
sin(~ YtVYYY
1~ ;1 ;1~ nVAssuming:
the equation of motion:
by the Ansatz: 1)(),( ; /)(/~
cos)()( ttIntntVtItY nnnn
Inserting the Ansatz in the equation of motion and integrating overthe fast oscillations one gets for the slowly varying variables:
nnnnn
nnnnn
dIIdJn
InJII
sin]/[2
cos2~
2/1
2/1
Next: n=2, drop indices
Superconductive Pumping of Nanovibrations
Resonance approximation
)~
sin(~ YtVYYY
1~ ;1 ;1~ nVAssuming:
the equation of motion:
by the Ansatz: 1)(),( ; /)(/~
cos)()( ttIntntVtItY nnnn
Inserting the Ansatz in the equation of motion and integrating overthe fast oscillations one gets for the slowly varying variables:
nnnnn
nnnnn
dIIdJn
InJII
sin]/[2
cos2~
2/1
2/1
Next: n=2, drop indices
20
0I
I
II
I
0
2/~ I IIIIIJ
I 6.9)(2 02
0
0I I
I~
)(4 2 IJ
IIJ ~)cos()(4 2
)sin((I)4 2 J 0
0)(I02 J
Pumping Dumping
;20
2
H
H
c2
2220 J8eL
mcH
Multistability of the S-NEM Weak Link Dynamics
)(64 22
2
IHLe
cjdc
;0 cII HH
c2
2220 J8eL
mcH
)(Hjdc
;20
2
H
H
;cIIH;cIH
;0 cIIII HH
H
)(HI
cIHH 0
cIIcI HHH
cIIHH
0I
Onset of the dc Supercurrent on Resonance
I
V2c c0V
2
1
0VV
V
t
cV
Current-Voltage Characteristics
If ~1 GHz:
V0 ~ 5 V,
2c ~ 50 nV
If jdc ~ 100 nAI1,2 ~ 5 nA
• Phase coherence between remote superconductors can be supported by shuttling of Cooper pairs.
• Quantum nanovibrations cause Aharonov-Bohm interference determining finite magneto-resistance of suspended 1-D wire.
• Resonant pumping of nanovibrations modifies the dynamics of a NEM superconducting weak link and leads to a giant magnetoresistance effect (finite dc supercurrent at a dc driving voltage).
• Multistable nanovibration dynamics allow for a hysteretic I-V curve, sensitivity to initial conditions, and switching between different stable vibration regimes.
NEM-Assisted Quantum Coherence - Conclusions