+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Radiation Test Report - CERN PSI... · project Radiation Test Report ... 120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2...

Radiation Test Report - CERN PSI... · project Radiation Test Report ... 120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2...

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: vuongkhue
View: 218 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
13
CERN Div./Group RadWG EDMS Document No. 1155504 CERN CH-1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland the Large Hadron Collider project the Large Hadron Collider project Radiation Test Report PSI (PIF Facility) 1. Responsibility Tested by: Julien Palluel Group: BE/CO Prepared by: Julien Palluel / Didier Caretti / Giovanni Spiezia Group: BE/CO EN/STI Date start: 15/04/2011 Date end: 16/04/2011 Equipment type concerned: WorldFIP FIPDiag 2. DUT (Device Under Test) identification and operating conditions DUT id DUT name DUT type Version number Serial number(s) a FIPDiagA FIPDiag V1.05 HCCBWDB___-HL000171 Samples tested Current consumption initial Frequency Memory used Fuse Anti Latchup 120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2 500mA PTC 500mA during 1.6s (measured in lab) Run 1 Connection type Macrocycle Mode Collimator Targeted area WorldFIP 100ms Standalone No collimator was used Center of the card DUT id DUT name DUT type Version number Serial number(s) b FIPDiagB FIPDiag V1.05 HCCBWDB___-HL000173 Samples tested Current consumption initial Frequency Memory used Fuse Anti Latchup 120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2 500mA PTC 500mA during 1.6s (measured in lab) Run 2 Connection type Macrocycle Mode Collimator Targeted area WorldFIP 100ms Standalone No collimator was used Bottom of the card (below MicroFIP) DUT id DUT name DUT type Version number Serial number(s) c FIPDiagC FIPDiag V1.05 HCCBWDB___-HL000175 Samples tested Current consumption initial Frequency Memory used Fuse Anti Latchup 120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2 500mA PTC 500mA during 1.6s Run 3 Connection type Macrocycle Mode Collimator Targeted area WorldFIP 15ms Standalone 5cm Only MicroFIP
Transcript

CERN Div./Group

RadWG

EDMS Document No.

1155504

CERN

CH-1211 Geneva 23 Switzerland

the Large Hadron Collider project

the Large Hadron Collider project

Radiation Test Report

PSI (PIF Facility)

1. Responsibility

Tested by: Julien Palluel Group: BE/CO

Prepared by: Julien Palluel / Didier Caretti / Giovanni Spiezia Group: BE/CO EN/STI

Date start: 15/04/2011 Date end: 16/04/2011

Equipment type concerned: WorldFIP FIPDiag

2. DUT (Device Under Test) identification and operating conditions

DUT id DUT name DUT type Version number Serial number(s)

a FIPDiagA FIPDiag V1.05 HCCBWDB___-HL000171

Samples

tested

Current

consumption initial

Frequency Memory

used

Fuse Anti Latchup

120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2 500mA PTC 500mA during 1.6s

(measured in lab)

Run 1 Connection type Macrocycle Mode Collimator Targeted area

WorldFIP 100ms Standalone No

collimator

was used

Center of the card

DUT id DUT name DUT type Version number Serial number(s)

b FIPDiagB FIPDiag V1.05 HCCBWDB___-HL000173

Samples

tested

Current

consumption initial

Frequency Memory

used

Fuse Anti Latchup

120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2 500mA PTC 500mA during 1.6s

(measured in lab)

Run 2 Connection type Macrocycle Mode Collimator Targeted area

WorldFIP 100ms Standalone No

collimator

was used

Bottom of the card

(below MicroFIP)

DUT id DUT name DUT type Version number Serial number(s)

c FIPDiagC FIPDiag V1.05 HCCBWDB___-HL000175

Samples

tested

Current

consumption initial

Frequency Memory

used

Fuse Anti Latchup

120mA 1MHz 2Bytes x 2 500mA PTC 500mA during 1.6s

Run 3 Connection type Macrocycle Mode Collimator Targeted area

WorldFIP 15ms Standalone 5cm Only MicroFIP

EDMS number

1155504

Page 2 of 13

Other devices present in the setup:

• Manager “FIPMOBILE” SLC5 (on surface)

• FIPWatcher (on surface)

• Labview acquisition system (on surface)

3. Description of the test setup

The Manager dialogs with FIPDiag and compares sent value and received value every macrocycle, records both values with timestamp if different. If the FIPDiag doesn’t answer, the manager records timestamp with FIPDiag status. It tests also if identification variable is altered.

Components of the FIPDiag :

Q1 Si3443 canal P

U10 74HCT4040 12-stages counter

U8, U11 74HC11D Triple 3-inputs AND

U13 74HCT32D Quad 2-inputs OR gate

U17 74HCT123D Dual retriggerable monostable multivibrator with reset

U4 FIELDRIVE SSSB231 0908A

U6 MICROFIP Microcontroler basic FIP MQFP100 AMI 0842LLD 15016-530 (new version)

U5 FIELDTR JMF FALS-122 10/21

U7 MAX809 Reset supervisor (Power on reset)

U14 LM311D Voltage comparator

U18 MC7805ABD2T Regulator+5V 1A

U19 74HCT1G04GW Single inverter

XTAL3 32.768kHz oscillator CMS IQXO-70

XTAL1 40MHz oscillator

EDMS number

1155504

Page 3 of 13

Mechanisms Built-in :

Anti lachup reset (Vcc)

Remote reset (Vcc)

EDMS number

1155504

Page 4 of 13

Mechanisms added :

Current measure + logging

5v Vcc and 5v Supply measure + logging

Remote power cycle (11v Supply)

Datas control + logging

Setup schema :

EDMS number

1155504

Page 5 of 13

We processed one run for each card, 3 runs in total. Each card has been placed in order to place the beam like this: DUT a :

DUT b :

Components irradiated : Q1 Si3443

U13 74HCT32D

U17 74HCT123D

U6 MICROFIP

U7 MAX809

XTAL1 40MHz oscillator

Components irradiated : Q1 Si3443

U10 74HCT4040

U8, U11 74HC11D

U13 74HCT32D

U14 LM311D

U18 MC7805ABD2T

XTAL3 32.768kHz oscillator

EDMS number

1155504

Page 6 of 13

DUT c :

FIPDiag back :

Components irradiated : U17 74HCT123D (not all)

U6 MICROFIP

U7 MAX809

NB : The monostable U7 has been disabled for

DUT c (Thanks to Paul’s idea)

EDMS number

1155504

Page 7 of 13

“FIPMobile” :

Schema for the acquisition of current and voltages :

EDMS number

1155504

Page 8 of 13

Control room :

4. Test facility PSI, PIF Facility 230 MeV proton beam :

EDMS number

1155504

Page 9 of 13

FIPDiag under fire :

5. BEAM CONDITIONS:

Run # DUT id Start End Part type Energy

[MeV]

Flux

[P/cm-2/s]

Dose rate

rad/s (Gy/H)

Collimator

Diam [cm]

DUT

angle

[deg]

1 a 7h22 8h02 Proton 230 1.60E+08 8.6 (309) 9cm 90

2 b 9h32 10h35 Proton 230 1.60E+08 8.6 (309) 9cm 90

3 c 10h57 11h51 Proton 230 1.60E+08 8.6 (309) 5cm 90

The dose rate is much higher than the one expected in the LHC tunnel. In fact,

lower dose rate values would make the test too long and, therefore unpractical.

One has to note that low dose rate enhances the degradation of analog

components. The test is run up to high dose (a few factor higher than the TID

expected in the LHC tunnel) in order to compensate the enhanced low dose

rate effect.

EDMS number

1155504

Page 10 of 13

6. Observed failure modes

DUT id Failure id Description Recovery mode (reset, power cycle)

a a1 Current consumption goes up to 340mA,

make the 5v voltage down to 3.5v. Ok

after a manual power cycle. Seems like a

SEL on a component.

BEAM DUMP

Reset soft didn’t work

Power cycle OK

a a2 Com lost after a rise of the current.

Several soft reset and power cycles but

the card does not answer anymore. With

a test with a multimeter, the U7 was

blocked and delivered a permanent

reset.

BEAM DUMP

Reset soft didn’t work

Power cycle didn’t work

No recovery

c c1 Com lost during 101cycles (1.5sec) then

ok after the AntiLatchUp power cycle. .

Seems like a SEL on the MicroFIP (or

U17).

AntiLatchUp reset works. We do not

see the current increase but it must

be due to the slow logging

acquisition. The time of the com lost

(1.5sec) match exactly with reset

period, and the Vsupply was on.

c c2 A huge rise of the current drop down the

voltage. We tried to compensate the

drop of the voltage by increasing several

times the 11v supply. Then a lot of data

errors and com lost occurs with the

current at 700mA. At this time we think

that the AntiLatchUp reset doesn’t work

anymore.Looks like total dose effect, it

will be interesting to test it again after a

long rest. (MicroFIP + U17)

BEAM DUMP

Reset soft didn’t work

Power cycle didn’t work

No recovery

7. Test beam results

Run # DUT

id time

Failure(s)

observed

Fluence* since

last recovery

[cm-2]

Total dose

[Gy] comment

1 a 7h40 a1 2E+11 108

1 a 8h02 a2 1.6E+11

108+86 =

194

2 b 10h35 none 6E+11 320

Current has

started to grow

at the end

3 c 11h20 c1 1.7E+11 95

3 c 11h51 c2 4.8E+11 95+159 =

254

EDMS number

1155504

Page 11 of 13

Run1 logging graph :

Run2 logging graph :

EDMS number

1155504

Page 12 of 13

Run3 logging graph :

8. Other observations

To measure current, a resistance of 10 Ohm was on the surface. This choice was not

appropriate because of the unexpected transom, raise of the current observed, that

causes drops in voltage too great and does not guarantee the proper functioning of

the 5V regulator.

9. Conclusions The purpose of these tests was to identify which components of the module FIPDiag

benefit from being replaced for the new card NanoFIPDiag : FIPDiag with the chip NanoFIP in place of MicroFIP, now recognized as sensitive to radiation.

The results are quite good, a component U7 MAX809 has been identified as weak and will be replaced by passive components (see Amelioration fiabilite WorldFip

wfdc001.pdf) in the next design NanoFIPDiag. The MicroFIP held to about 90Gy, mean score but not alarming for a diagnostic

module. However it worked in standalone mode, its mode of operation as simple and with less memory. In addition, given the small number of observed events, it is

difficult to evaluate a cross-section, further testing would be needed in microcontroller mode.

EDMS number

1155504

Page 13 of 13

10. Big Thanks

I would like to thanks Eva Gousiou, Paul Peronnard and Giovanni Spiezia for their

help in these tests.


Recommended