+ All Categories
Home > Documents > RAFT Radar Fence Transponder Critical Design Review Bob Bruninga, CDR USN (ret) MIDN 1/C Ben Orloff...

RAFT Radar Fence Transponder Critical Design Review Bob Bruninga, CDR USN (ret) MIDN 1/C Ben Orloff...

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 216 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
77
RAFT RAFT Radar Fence Transponder Radar Fence Transponder Critical Design Review Critical Design Review Bob Bruninga, CDR USN (ret) Bob Bruninga, CDR USN (ret) MIDN 1/C Ben Orloff MIDN 1/C Ben Orloff MIDN 1/C Eric Kinzbrunner MIDN 1/C Eric Kinzbrunner MIDN 1/C JoEllen Rose MIDN 1/C JoEllen Rose Midn 1/C Steven Schwarzer Midn 1/C Steven Schwarzer
Transcript

RAFTRAFTRadar Fence TransponderRadar Fence Transponder

Critical Design ReviewCritical Design ReviewBob Bruninga, CDR USN (ret)Bob Bruninga, CDR USN (ret)

MIDN 1/C Ben OrloffMIDN 1/C Ben OrloffMIDN 1/C Eric Kinzbrunner MIDN 1/C Eric Kinzbrunner

MIDN 1/C JoEllen RoseMIDN 1/C JoEllen RoseMidn 1/C Steven SchwarzerMidn 1/C Steven Schwarzer

2223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Assumption: Launch NET February 2006Assumption: Launch NET February 2006

RAFT KickoffRAFT Kickoff Apr 04 Apr 04 RAFT USNA SRRRAFT USNA SRR Sep 04 Sep 04 RAFT PDRRAFT PDR 19 Nov 0419 Nov 04 RAFT Phase 0/1 SafetyRAFT Phase 0/1 Safety 16 Dec 0416 Dec 04 RAFT Phase 2 SafetyRAFT Phase 2 Safety 10 Feb 0510 Feb 05 RAFT CDRRAFT CDR 23 Feb 0523 Feb 05 RAFT Flight Unit TestingRAFT Flight Unit Testing May 05 May 05 RAFT Phase 3 SafetyRAFT Phase 3 Safety Aug 05 Aug 05 RAFT Delivery/InstallRAFT Delivery/Install Oct 05 Oct 05 RAFT Flight (STS-116)RAFT Flight (STS-116) 09 Feb 06 09 Feb 06

Key Milestones: ScheduleKey Milestones: Schedule

3323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

So Many CUBEsatsSo Many CUBEsats30 to 50 in Construction30 to 50 in Construction

AIAA/USUSmall Sat Conference

30% of papers were for PICO, NANO and CUBEsats

All smaller than 10 cm

How to Track them???

4423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Mission StatementMission Statement

To provide the Navy Space Surveillance (NSSS) radar fence To provide the Navy Space Surveillance (NSSS) radar fence with a with a means to determine the boundsmeans to determine the bounds of a constellation of of a constellation of PicoSats otherwise undetectable by the radar fencePicoSats otherwise undetectable by the radar fence

To enable NSSS to independently To enable NSSS to independently calibrate their transmit and calibrate their transmit and

receive beamsreceive beams using signals from RAFT. using signals from RAFT.

This must be accomplished with This must be accomplished with two PicoSatstwo PicoSats, one that will , one that will actively transmit and receive, and one with a passively actively transmit and receive, and one with a passively augmented radar cross-section.augmented radar cross-section.

Additionally, RAFT will provide experimental Additionally, RAFT will provide experimental communications communications transponderstransponders for the Navy Military Affiliate Radio System, the for the Navy Military Affiliate Radio System, the United States Naval Academy’s Yard Patrol crafts, and the United States Naval Academy’s Yard Patrol crafts, and the Amateur Satellite Service.Amateur Satellite Service.

5523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

NSSS Radar FenceNSSS Radar Fence

6623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT1 Mission RAFT1 Mission ArchitectureArchitecture

7723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

MARScom Mission MARScom Mission Architecture Architecture

8823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Military Affiliate Radio Military Affiliate Radio SystemSystem

The Mission of the MARS system is to:

Provide auxiliary communications for military, federal and local disaster management officials

Assist in effecting communications under emergency conditions.

Handle morale and quasi-official communications traffic for members of the Armed Forces and authorized U.S. Government civilian personnel

Provide routine operations in support of MARSGRAMS and … contacts between service personnel and their families back home home.

9923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Yard Patrol Craft Yard Patrol Craft ApplicationApplication

Unique UHF AM Uplink and HF SSB downlink

101023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT1 and RAFT1 and MARScomMARScom

5” Cubes

3 Antennas Each

Identical Mechanical

111123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

121223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

PassPass GeometryGeometry

131323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Raft1 Block DiagramRaft1 Block Diagram

141423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

MARScom Block MARScom Block DiagramDiagram

151523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT Lifetime EstimateRAFT Lifetime Estimate

6.5 Months

3.8 Mo

161623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

MARScom Lifetime MARScom Lifetime EstimateEstimate

4.9 Months

3 Mo

171723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFTRAFTDeploymentDeployment

Velocity of pair:

1.5 m/s

Velocity of RAFT:

1.19 m/s

Velocity of MARScom:

1.91 m/s

181823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Low Friction Track Low Friction Track Separation TestSeparation Test

191923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Mechanical DesignMechanical Design

202023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Using “IDEAS” CAD Using “IDEAS” CAD ModelingModeling

212123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Assembly & FastenersAssembly & Fasteners

222223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Solar Panel Design on 5 Solar Panel Design on 5 SidesSides

COTS Silicon Cells on PCB panel

Covered with Clear Teflon Coating

1.5 Watt panel

Mechanically rugged for rain/hail/birds

PCsat Flight Heritage

232323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Multi-Function Top Multi-Function Top PanelPanel

VHF Antenna holes

HF whip hole

Pockets for other satellite antennas and Sep Switch

242423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT1 RAFT1 InternInternal al DiagraDiagramm

Top Top ViewView

Ant pocket& Sep SW

252523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT RAFT InternaInternal l

Corner Corner DetailDetail Whip antenna and

sep springs

262623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT RAFT SEP-SEP-SwitchSwitch

Corner Corner DetailDetail

272723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

MARS- MARS- comm comm InternInternal al

Top Top ViewView

282823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Side PanelSide Panel

292923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Side Panel DetailSide Panel Detail

Loaded Side

.25” thick

303023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

1. NEA DEVICE ACTUATES2. LATCH ROD SLIDES FORWARD3. DOOR SWINGS OPEN AND LATCHES4. PICOSATs EJECT

1

2

3

4

Door in open, latched, landing position

SSPL4410 LAUNCHER: OperationSSPL4410 LAUNCHER: Operation

NOTE: Top Cover and Latchtrain Cover not shown in this view

No separation until after both picosats clear launcher

313123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION

5 1 DOOR

PIC OSAT

PUSHER

MAINSPRING

PRELOAD BLOCK

24

2 1

13

1 2

PARTS LIST

1

2

45

8

6

9

3

6

8

7

9 NEA DEVICE

BAC K COVER

LATCH

LATCHROD

1

1

1

1

* FRONT PICOSAT NOT SHOWN BUT IS IDENTIC AL TO REAR PICOSAT AND REPRESENTED WITH HIDDEN LINES

F

F

F

F

F7

ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION

5 1 DOOR

PIC OSAT

PUSHER

MAINSPRING

PRELOAD BLOCK

24

2 1

13

1 2

PARTS LIST

1

2

45

8

6

9

3

6

8

7

9 NEA DEVICE

BAC K COVER

LATCH

LATCHROD

1

1

1

1

* FRONT PICOSAT NOT SHOWN BUT IS IDENTIC AL TO REAR PICOSAT AND REPRESENTED WITH HIDDEN LINES

F

F

F

F

F7

For SSPL4410 with MEPSI:• PICOSAT mass m = 1.6 kg = 3.5 lbs• Preload > { 24 g x 3.5 lbs = 84 lbs } • F = 125 lb max preload + 24 g x 3.5 lb 210 lbs• 24 g calculated in SVP

For SSPL5510 with RAFT:• PICOSAT mass m = 7 kg = 15.4 lbs• Preload > { 24 g x 15.4 lbs = 370 lbs }• F = 500 lb max preload + 24 g x 15.4 lb 870 lbs

SSPL4410 LAUNCHER: Preload and SSPL4410 LAUNCHER: Preload and Launch LoadsLaunch Loads

credit:

323223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Side Panel Buckling AnalysisSide Panel Buckling Analysis

333323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Structure Displacements Structure Displacements

343423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Depressurization RateDepressurization Rate

.040 hole

Gives 2:1 margin for

depressurization

353523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Battery BoxBattery Box

363623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Custom Side Panel Custom Side Panel for Antenna Crank and GSE Connectorfor Antenna Crank and GSE Connector

373723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFTRAFTAntennaAntennaSeparationSeparationMechanismsMechanisms

383823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Assembly PlanAssembly Plan

393923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT Antenna SpringsRAFT Antenna Springs

404023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Antenna DetailAntenna Detail

414123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Separation VelocitiesSeparation Velocities

Initial Energy Final Energy

i fSpring Potential Spring Potential Kinetic Energy HFWork

0.720separationmv s

1

1

41.5 0.720 1.91

7

31.5 0.720 1.19

7

RAFTMARScom launch separation

total

MARScomRAFT launch separation

total

m kgm m mv v v s s sm kg

m kgm m mv v v s s sm kg

Click here for entire documentation

424223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Antenna Buckling AnalysisAntenna Buckling Analysis

434323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Long-Wire Antenna AssyLong-Wire Antenna Assy

444423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Long-Wire Antenna DetailLong-Wire Antenna Detail

454523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

VHF EZNEC PlotsVHF EZNEC Plots

464623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT1 Magnetic Attitude RAFT1 Magnetic Attitude ControlControl

474723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Engineering DrawingsEngineering Drawings

Top PanelTop Panel Bottom PanelBottom Panel TX Panel (TX Panel (Page 1Page 1 / / Page2Page2)) RX Panel (RX Panel (Page 1Page 1 / / Page 2Page 2)) HF HF SpoolSpool//CasingCasing

484823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Mass Budget (kg)Mass Budget (kg)RAFT1 MARScom

Component Mass (kg) Comments Component Mass (kg) CommentsSpool w/ HF Antenna 0.0664 Actual Spool w/ HF Antenna 0.0664 ActualVHF Antenna 0.0046 Estimate VHF FM RCVR 0.094 EstimateUHF Antenna 0.0046 Estimate VHF AM RCVR 0.094 EstimatePSK-10 Board 0.1215 Includes Interface SSB Exciter 0.1 EstimateTNC Board 0.1409 Actual 1W Linear PA 0.04 EstimateInterface Board 0 Estimated in PSK-10 Splitter 0.04 EstimateTransmitter Board 0.0941 Actual Decoder 0.04 EstimateReceiver Board 0.083 Actual Batteries 0.168 EstimateBattery Boxes (2) 0.0406 Actual Ant/Spring combo 0.3 EstimateAA Batteries (11) 0.2607 Actual 20% Reserve 0.1752 EstimateB1 Panel 0.189 Actual B1 Panel 0.189 ActualB2 Panel 0.189 Actual B2 Panel 0.189 ActualTransmitter Panel 0.155 Actual Transmitter Panel 0.155 ActualReceiver Panel 0.146 Actual Receiver Panel 0.146 ActualBottom Panel 0.121 Actual Bottom Panel 0.121 ActualTop Panel 0.121 Actual Top Panel 0.121 ActualPCSat Solar Panels (5) 0.3255 Actual PCSat Solar Panels (5) 0.3255 ActualTOTAL 2.0629 Total 2.2977Max Allowed 4 Max Allowed 3

494923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Each panel one pigtail

All plug into Interface Board on the PSK

panel

RAFT1 Panels and Connectors

New @ CDR

505023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Interface BoardInterface Board

515123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

EPS and Solar Power EPS and Solar Power BudgetBudget

Computing average solar power for a cube satellite taking weighted average of all 26 possible orientations.

This analysis is for an ISS orbit with a maximum eclipse of 39% with a 25% efficient solar cell.

525223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Solar Power BudgetSolar Power Budget

Conclusion: The PCsat panels per side of the satellite and a 39% eclipse time, an average available bus load of 0.96 watts will be available to the spacecraft.

SCef f =Solar Cell Efficiency

Id=Elements of Inherent Degradation

a=Sun Angle

n=number of exposed cells

A=area of one cell

t=exposure multiple

ttotal=total number of exposures

Td=Time in Daylight

Te=Time in EclipseXd=Daylight path efficiency

SCef f (%) 25 25 25

Id 0.77 0.77 0.77

SolarConstant 1367 1367 1367

PBOL (W/m2) 263.15 263.15 263.15

a (deg) 90 45 33

P (W/m2) 263.15 186.07 143.32n 4 8 12

A (m2) 0.0028 0.0028 0.0028

P total (W) 2.95 4.17 4.82

t 6 12 8

ttotal 26 26 26

x 1/4 1/2 1/3Pav g (W) 0.6801 1.9237 1.4817

P totalav g (W) 2.08

Td 0.61

Te 0.39

Xe 0.65

Xd 0.85

L (W) 0.96

Xe=Eclipse path efficiency

L=BusLoad

PBOL=SCef f *Id*SolarConstant

P=PBOL*sin(a)

L=(P totalav g*Xe*Xd*Td)/(Te*Xd+Td*Xe)

P totalav g=Pav g1+Pavg2+Pav g3

P total=P*n*A

x=t/ttotal

Pav g=P total*x

535323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

RAFT1 Required Power RAFT1 Required Power BudgetBudget

Current (mA) Normal Avrg (mA) PSK-31 Avrg (mA) STBY Avrg (mA)VHF FM TX 500.00 2% 10.00 10% 50.00 1% 5.00VHF FM RX 30.00 100% 30.00 100% 30.00 100% 30.00

TNC 15.00 100% 15.00 100% 15.00 100% 15.0029 MHz RX 50.00 0% 0.00 10% 0.05 0% 0.00

20% Reserve 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00Avrg (mA) 64.00 104.05 59.00

Normal Use PSK-31 STBY AvailableAvrg(mA) 64.00 104.05 59.00 114.2857

System (Volts) 8.40 8.40 8.40 8.4Avrg (Watts) 0.5376 0.87402 0.4956 0.96

Whole Orbit Average

10% Depth of Discharge

545423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

MARScom Required MARScom Required Power BudgetPower Budget

Current (mA) Normal Current (mA) YPSATCOM Current (mA)VHF FM RX 30.00 100% 30.00 100% 30.00UHF AM RX 40.00 0% 0.00 100% 30.00SSB XMTR 200.00 8.34% 4.17 8.34% 4.17

TNC 30.00 100% 100% 10.0020% Reserve 12.00 100% 100% 8.00

Avrg (mA) 34.17 82.17

Normal Use YPSATCOM AvalibleAvrg (mA) 34.17 82.17 114.2857143

System (Volts) 8.40 8.40 8.4Avrg (Watts) 0.29 0.69 0.96

555523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Power SystemPower System

565623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Simplified Power SystemSimplified Power System

Charge in Parallel

Transmit in Series

Duty cycle 4%

100 mA

100 mA

60 mA

575723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Charge in Parallel

Transmit in Series

Duty cycle 4%

585823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Operations Safety FeaturesOperations Safety Features

All Transmitter circuits time-out to OFF

595923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

606023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Battery Tests NiCdBattery Tests NiCd

No mass change, no leakageWorst case 10% loss of capacityDesign Capacity has a 4 to 20 overdesign factor

616123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

PCsat Solar Panel I-V PCsat Solar Panel I-V CurveCurve

Voltage vs. Current

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Volts

Am

ps

Amps @ 0

Amps @ 20

Amps @ 30

Amps @ 40

Amps @ 50

Amps @ 60

discharged

Full charge Angle

626223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Post Cold Test Battery Post Cold Test Battery ConditionCondition

(No Leakage)(No Leakage)

636323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Dead Battery Recovery Dead Battery Recovery TestTest

646423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

PCsat P-V CurvePCsat P-V CurvePower vs. Voltage

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Volts

Wa

tts

Power @ 0

Power @ 20

Power @ 30

Power @ 40

Power @ 50

Power @ 60

discharged

Full charge

656523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Frequency CoordinationFrequency Coordination

RAFT1 ITU Request Form submitted.RAFT1 ITU Request Form submitted.• TX: 145.825 MHz, 2 Watt, 20 KHz B/W TX: 145.825 MHz, 2 Watt, 20 KHz B/W

FMFM• RX: 29.400-29.403 MHz PSK-31 ReceiverRX: 29.400-29.403 MHz PSK-31 Receiver• RX: 145.825 MHz AX.25 FMRX: 145.825 MHz AX.25 FM• 216.98 MHz NSSS transponder216.98 MHz NSSS transponder

MARScom DD 1494 submitted.MARScom DD 1494 submitted.• 148.375-148.975 MHz VHF cmd/user 148.375-148.975 MHz VHF cmd/user

uplinkuplink• 24-29 MHz Downlink24-29 MHz Downlink• 300 MHz UHF YP Craft Uplink Whip300 MHz UHF YP Craft Uplink Whip

Resonate at 216.98 MHzResonate at 216.98 MHz

666623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Radiation Hazard = NoneRadiation Hazard = None

Deployed and Active

11 V/m

Pre-Separation 0.11 V/m

Antennas Compressed, Shorted, Shielded and Sep-SW OFF

676723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Material StatusMaterial Status Material On Hand: Material On Hand:

• All flight ReceiversAll flight Receivers• All flight TransmittersAll flight Transmitters• All flight TNC'sAll flight TNC's• All Electronic Components from stockAll Electronic Components from stock• All Connectors All Connectors • All wire and cables All wire and cables

Manufactured: Manufactured: • 4 Diagonal Corner Brackets 4 Diagonal Corner Brackets

On Order (delivery any day now): On Order (delivery any day now): • All Solar Panels All Solar Panels • All Nicad Cells All Nicad Cells

To be Ordered: To be Ordered: • Flight TNC ROMS (after engineering model testing) Flight TNC ROMS (after engineering model testing) • Flight Interface PCBFlight Interface PCB

686823 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Material Status (cont.)Material Status (cont.)

To Be Manufactured: To Be Manufactured: • 2 top panels 2 top panels • 2 Bottom panels 2 Bottom panels • 2 B1 panels 2 B1 panels • 2 B2 panels 2 B2 panels • 2 RX panels 2 RX panels • 2 TX panels 2 TX panels • 4 Ant PCB and spring assemblies 4 Ant PCB and spring assemblies • 2 sets HF antenna boards 2 sets HF antenna boards • 2 HF flight antenna spool assemblies 2 HF flight antenna spool assemblies

696923 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Shuttle Safety Shuttle Safety RequirementsRequirements

Fracture Control Plan Fracture Control Plan Captive & RedundantCaptive & Redundant Fastener integrity Fastener integrity Captive & RedundantCaptive & Redundant Structural model of RAFTStructural model of RAFT Ideas model, Ideas model,

BucklingBuckling Venting analysisVenting analysis Done. 0.04 “Done. 0.04 “ Simple mechanismsSimple mechanisms AntennasAntennas Materials / OutgassingMaterials / Outgassing COTS, COTS, Replace ElectrolyticsReplace Electrolytics Conformal coat PC boardsConformal coat PC boards YesYes Wire sizing and fusingWire sizing and fusing #24, fuse 1 amp#24, fuse 1 amp Radiation hazardRadiation hazard Below 0.1v/mBelow 0.1v/m Battery safetyBattery safety YesYes Shock and vibrationShock and vibration YesYes

707023 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Battery Safety Battery Safety RequirementsRequirements

Must have circuit interrupters in ground legMust have circuit interrupters in ground leg Inner surface and terminals coated with insulating materialsInner surface and terminals coated with insulating materials Physically constrained from movement and allowed to ventPhysically constrained from movement and allowed to vent Absorbent materials used to fill void spacesAbsorbent materials used to fill void spaces Battery storage temperature limits are -30°C to +50°CBattery storage temperature limits are -30°C to +50°C Prevent short circuits and operate below MFR’s maxPrevent short circuits and operate below MFR’s max Thermal analysis under load and no-loadThermal analysis under load and no-load Battery must meet vibration and shock resistance stdsBattery must meet vibration and shock resistance stds Must survive single failure without inducing hazardsMust survive single failure without inducing hazards Match cells for voltage, capacity, and charge retentionMatch cells for voltage, capacity, and charge retention

717123 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Questions?Questions?

727223 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Backup SlidesBackup Slides

737323 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

-60 °C Battery Tests-60 °C Battery Tests

Triple walled chamber

Sealed for condensation

Adding

Dry Ice

30 Hour test @ -60C

747423 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

-60 °C Battery Test: -60 °C Battery Test: Thermal ConditionsThermal Conditions

Thermal Battery Test

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Time (hrs)

Tem

per

atu

re (

°C)

Batteries

Can

Ice

757523 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Post -60 °C Charge Temp Post -60 °C Charge Temp in Vacuumin Vacuum

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00

Time (hr)

Te

mp

°C

767623 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Post Cold Test Discharge Post Cold Test Discharge CurrentCurrent

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0 50 100 150 200

Time (min)

Cu

rre

nt

(A)

852 mA-H

777723 Feb 200523 Feb 2005 RAFT Critical Design Review

Dead Battery Charge Dead Battery Charge EfficiencyEfficiency


Recommended