MLos Angeles County
Metropolitan
Transportation
Authority
818 West Seventh Street
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 9oo17
213.623.H94
RCC BOARD RECOMMENDATION
METRO RED LINE, SEGMENT 2 - CONTRACT NO.
HOLLYWOOD/WESTERN STATIONRECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD
B271
The RCC Board approved staff’s recommendation.
January 4, 1994
Los Angeles County
Metropolitan
Transportation
Authority
818 West Seventh Street
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 9oo17
~SSUE:
MEMO TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RCC BOARD MEMBERS - 1/10 MEETING
EDWARD McSPEDON
METRO RED LINE SEGMENT 2CONTRACT B271, HOLLYWOOD/WESTERN STATIONRECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD
Contract Number and Title B271, Hollywood/Western Station
Contract Type Unit Priced, Construction
Lowest-Priced Responsive and Responsible Bidder Kiewit-Shea, A Joint Venture
On December 2, 1993, five bids were publicly opened. All five (5) bids werereviewed.
BIDDER NAME
I"TOTALBID
JD"EGOAL
AND ADDRESS PRICE = 25%
RESPONSWE BIDDERS
Kiewit-Shoe, A JV $38,948,000.00 MET10704 Shoemaker Avenue 28.86%Santa Fe Springs, CA 90607
Tutor-Saliba-Perini, A JV $ 39,477,000.00 MET15901 Olden StreetSylmar, CA 91342
Welsh Pacific Construction $ 39,993,669.00 MET299 Foam StreetMonterey, CA 93940
Kajima-Ray Wilson, A JV $ 40,289,001.07 MET200 S. Los Roblcs Ave., Suite #400Pasadena, CA 91101
NON-RESPONSIVE BIDDER
* The "Total Bid Price" is the basis of the award and the Contract Award Amount.All bid prices shown are validated for arithmetic errors.
RCC Board Members - 1/10 MeetingContract B271, Recommendation for AwardJanuary 4, 1994Page 2
The apparent low bidder, PCL Construction, was determined to be non-responsivefor failing to meet the 25% DBE goal. Their proposed DBE attainment wascalculated at 21.84%. PCL Construction also provided Good Faith Efforts thatwere determined not acceptable
The second low bidder, Kiewit-Shea JV, was determined to be the lowest-pricedresponsive and responsible bidder and is therefore recommended for award. TheKiewit-Shea JV met and exceeded the 25% DBE goal by utilizing thesubcontractors shown on Attachment B.
Attachment A delineates the cost details of this award. A 10% contract reservefund of $ 3,894,800.00 is recommended to cover the cost of changes and extrawork. This contingency amount will not be included in the Contract AwardAmount.
RECOMMENDATION
That the RCC Board recommend the MTA authorize the Chief Executive Officer toexecute Contract B271 with Kiewit-Shea, A JV, the lowest-priced responsive andresponsible bidder, in the amount below:
Total Contract Award Amount
10% Contract Reserve Fund (Excluded from Award Amount)
Total Commitment Request
$38,948,000.00
$3,894,800.00
$42,842,800.00
BACKGROUND
The B271 contract includes the construction of the Hollywood/Western Station,including all mechanical electrical, architectural, finish work, and all utility work.Also furnish and install auxiliary power transformers.
The award price is considered fair and reasonable based upon the receipt ofcompetitive bids. Kiewit-Shea, A JV possesses the California State ContractorClass "A" License that is required. It is estimated that this contract will producesixty-three (63) new jobs in Los Angeles County during the construction period.
RCC Board Members - 1/10 MeetingContract B271, Recommendation for AwardJanuary 4, 1994Page 3
PREPARED BY:
Metro Red Line Segment 2
EDVV~RD McSPEDON, P.E.Executive Officer, Construction andPresident Rail Construction Corporation
CONCUR:
Vice President/Project ManagerMetro Red Line Segment 2
RCC Board Members - 1/10 MeetingContract B271, Recommendation for AwardJanuary 4, 1994Page 4
ATTACHMENT A
CONTRACT HISTORY
1 Contract Award Value
2 Changes Approved to Date
3 Current Contract Value (1 + 2)
4 Expected Changes
5 Estimated Total Contract Value (3 + 4)
CONTINGENCY STATUS
$38,948,000 6 Board Approved Contract Contingency
$0 7 Changes Approved to Date(Contingency Used)
$38,948,000 8 Current Remaining Contingency (6 + 7)
$0 9 Expected Changes (same as No. 4)
$38,948,000 Requested Additional Increase (9 + 8)
$3,894,800
$0
$3,894,800
$0
$0
BIDDER NAMEAND ADDRESS
Kiewit-Shea, A Joint Venture10704 Shoemaker Ave.Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
PROPOSEDSUBCONTRACTORS
CONTACT PERSON
Ron Varela Co., Inc.422 Jenks CircleCorona, Ca 91720
Kiewit: Allen KearnsShea: JamesShontere310/946-1816
DBE’SETHNICITY
N/A
PERCENT
N/A
DESCRIPTION OF WORKTO BE DONE/DISCIPLINE
Prime
Harry T. Williams Lumber Co. Ken Pellman N/A 0.30% Form lumber, plywood, and1752 Border Ave. 310/787-3295 lagging.Torrance, CA 90501
D & N Concrete Pumping Dan Navarro Hispanic 4.40% Concrete pumping.P.O. Box 3595 310/533-7092Gardena, CA 90242
Cowelco Roger Smith N/A 1.70% Structural and1634 W. 14th St. 310/432-5766 miscellaneous metalLong Beach, CA fabrications.
Shasta Electric, Inc. Charles Watts N/A 6.00% Electrical.655 Brea Canyon Rd. 909/954-2341Walnut, CA 91789
Brett Yaden Hispanic 2.40% Export and import dirt,909/371/4241 material haul off.
Kim’s Marble & Granite1019 S. Flower St.Burbank, Ca 91502
C.M.Z.4926 N. Azusa CanyonIrwindale, CA
Asian
N/A
AsianPacifica Insulation7525 Rosecrans Ave.Paramount, CA 90723
Jong Lee818/955-9600
1.99%
1.90%
0.02%
Charles Danache818/962-6616
Andy310/634-6122
Tile and granite work.
Soldier pile.
Insulation.
Roger H. Proulx & Co. Jake Manley Anglo 0.10% Insulation, dielectric.6833 E. Rosecrans Ave., Unit C 310/630-8313 WomanParamount, CA 90723
Anzalone & Associates Pete Black 0.42% Painting.12700 Foothill Blvd; 213/877-8291Sylmar, CA 91342
BIDDER NAME PROPOSED CONTACT PERSON DBE’S PERCENT DESCRIPTION OF WORK TOAND ADDRESS SUBCONTRACTORS ETHNICITY BE DONE/DISCIPLINE
Kiewit-Shea, A Joint Venture o-- Kiewit: Allen Kearns N/A N/A Prime10704 Shoemaker Ave. Shea: James ShontereSanta Fe Springs, CA 90670 310/946-1816
Sanders Eng. Gari Black 2.90% HVAC.22405 E. La Palma Ave. 714/692-3000Yorba Linda, CA 92687
John N/A 1.40% Plumbing, fire protection.310/538-4200
Scott Co.14920 S. San PedroGardena, Ca 90248
Tri-City Rebar2377 W. Foothill Blvd., Unit 12Upland, CA 91786
Superior Gunite12306 Van Nuys Blvd.Lakeview Terrace, CA 91342
Lee Albright909/981-1136
David Gross818/896-9199
Hispanic N/A Rebar.
N/A 0.40% Shotcrete.
CONTACT STAFF PERSON: LARRY KELSEY (213) 244-6427
Los Angeles County
Metropolitan
Transportation
Authority
8]8 West Seventh Street
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90077
2~3.623.H94
February 2, 1994
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MTA BOARD MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES
GWENDOLYN W. WILLIAMS
FEBRUARY 2, 1994
This information is provided for your review for TODAY’s MTA BoardMeeting and the subject agenda item number.
[CL]GWEN#1 :B:\B271_5.AGA
INTEROFFICEMEMO
February 1, 1994
Los Angeles County
~Ietropolitan
Transportation
Authority
8i8 West Seventh Street
Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 9oo17
213.623A!94
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
MTA BOARD MEMBERS AND ALTERNATES
EDWARD McSPEDON, P.E.
FRANKLIN E. WHITE
CONTRACT NO. B271RCC RECOMMENDATION FOR AWARDHOLLYWOOD/WESTERN STATION
RECOMMENDATION
At the RCC Board meeting of January 24, 1994, the Board recommendedthat the MTA authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute ContractB271 with Kiewit-Shea, a JV, the lowest-priced responsive and responsiblebidder.
BACKGROUND
BID EVALUATION PROCESS
Contract B271 was bid as a low bid (IFB) procurement. The IFB processrequires an award to the lowest priced responsive\responsible bidder asdictated by both California and Federal law for construction contracts. Ifthe low priced bidder is not acceptable, the next lowest bidder is evaluatedand so on until one is accepted or all are rejected. In accordance withFederal Acquisition Regulations, the "preservation of the integrity of thecompetitive bid system dictates that, after bids have been opened, awardmust be made to that responsible bidder who submitted the lowestresponsive bid, unless there is a compelling reason to reject all bids andcancel the invitation." Invitations may be cancelled and all bids rejectedbefore award but after opening only under circumstances detailed inAttachment A.
MTA Board Members and AlternatesFebruary 1, 1994Page 2
For this bid effort five (5) bids were received. The bid documents wereclear and the bids received from four (4) bidders indicate a mutualunderstanding of the scope of work.
The evaluated bid price of four bidders was: @ $38.9mil, $39.5mil,$39.9mil and $40.3mil with PCLat $36.6mil. The engineer’s estimate was$45.7mil. All bidders were below the estimate. (See Attachment B.)Also, the bid prices received on the solicitation are lower in comparison toother RCC projects of similar scope.
The first step in evaluating a bid is to determine if all the bid forms areproperly filled out. In all except PCL’s case they were. California PublicContract Code (PCC) 4100 (See Attachment C) clearly requires all primebidders to list their subcontractors, stating their name, location, and scopeof work to be performed. If the scope is not listed, the prime contractormust perform the work itself. If these requirements are not met, thesubcontractors listed cannot be counted as performing on the contract.
In the subject bid PCL failed to list the location of ten (10) subcontractors.(See Attachment D)
PCC 4100 also requires that only one subcontractor be listed for one scopeof work or the prime contractor must perform the work itself.
In the subject bid PCL listed four (4) subcontractors doing two scopes work. (See Attachment E)
Due to the above areas being in conflict with the California PCC, staff hadno alternative but to disallow the subcontractors that were improperlylisted.
These requirements are ones that PCL must be familiar with to hold aCalifornia contractors license.
With the elimination of these subcontracts, PCL is performing most of thework itself and any of those which were DBE’s could no longer be countedtoward the DBE goal. (See Attachment F.) This forced staff to requestGood Faith Efforts from PCL in order to try to preserve the low bid.PCL’s Good Faith Efforts were found deficient in four (4) of the nine (9)requirements,
MTA Board Members and AlternatesFebruary 1, 1994Page 3
Staff had no alternative, under Federal law, but to evaluate the next lowestbidder. The remaining four bidders were all found to be responsive andresponsible and met the DBE goals without the need for Good Faith Efforts.(See Attachment G.) Good Faith Efforts have been approved by the MTABoard on February 3, 1994 (see AttachmentS).
The next lowest responsive/responsible bidder was Kiewit-Shea which wasrecommended for award.
The above steps conform with the requirements delineated in California andFederal law.
ATTACHMENT A
Invitations may be cancelled and all bids rejected before award but after openingwhen, the agency head determines in writing that--
(1) Inadequate or ambiguous specifications were cited in the invitation;
(2) Specifications have been revised;
(3) The supplies or services being contracted for are no longer required;
(4) The invitation did not provide for consideration of all factors of cost to theGovernment, such as cost of transporting Government-furnished property tobidders’ plants;
(5) Bids received indicate that the needs of the Government can be satisfied bya less expensive article differing from that for which the bids were invited;
(6) All otherwise acceptable bids received are at unreasonable prices, or only onebid is received and the contracting officer cannot determine thereasonableness of the bid price;
(7) The bids were not independently arrived at in open competition, werecollusive, or were submitted in bad faith (see Subpart 3.3 for reports to bemade to the Department of Justice);
(8) No responsive bid has been received from a responsible bidder.
(9) A cost comparison as prescribed in OMB Circular A-76 and Subpart 7.3shows that performance by the Government is more economical; or
(10) For other reasons, cancellation is clearly in the public’s interest.
Los Angeles County
Metropolitan
Transportation
Authority
Angeles. CA 9oof7
January 4, 1994
MEMO TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
RCC BOARD MEMBERS - 1/10 MEETING
EDWARD McSPEDON
METRO RED LINE SEGMENT 2CONTRACT B271, HOLLYWOOD/WESTERN STATIONRECOMMENDATION FOR AWARD
)SSUE:
Contract Number end Title
Contrect Type
B271, Hollywood/Western Station
Unit Priced. Construction
Lowest-Prlced Responsive e.d Re.poneible Bidder Kiewit-Shoe. A Joint Venture
On December 2, 1993, five bids were publicly opened. All five (5) bids werereviewed.
I 1BIDDER NAME ~ TOTAL BID ~ DBE GOALAND ADDRESS I PRICE I ~ :25%
RESPONSIVE BIDDERS
Kiewlt-Shee, A JV10704 Shoemsker AvenueSenfe Fe Springs. CA 90607
Tulor.Sellbs-Perini0 A JV15901 Olden StreetSyfme¢, CA 91342~
Welsh Pecific Construction299 Foem StreetMonte~ey, CA 93940
Kejlme.Ro’¢ Wilson. A JV200 S. Los Roblse Ave.. Suite 1400Pas~ena, CA $! 101
$ 38,948,000.O0
$ 39,477,000.00
$ 39,993,669°00
$ 40,289,OO 1.O7
MET28.86%
MET
MET
NON-RESPONSIVE BIDDER
/ C~LCL ~nstruction Services. Inc.
*l ~5 BardeenI~ne, CA 92715
I ~36,638.647.OO I NOT MET (GoodI* Feith EffortsI not eccepleble)
ENGINEER*S ESTIMATE I $45,680,416.00 I NIA
"- "~, ° The "Toter Bid Price" ie the besis of the sward end the Controot Aword Amo.unt;~’_ -’; All bid prices :shown ere velldefed for erilhmetic errors.
PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE § 3410
Bi4s on public works; specificationa by hmnd or trade ~ames not permitted; exception
$ Di~lg~) 210 C~F4~. 90, 163 C.A.3d 1175.
§ ~tlO. United Stat¢~ produce and proce~ed food~
¯ Any publ~ entity, as defmed jo Secfien II00, including any ~hoo] dlst~dct or community collegedistrk% when purchasing food, shall give preference to United Statce-grown p~oduce ~,~ .U-;tedStatce-proce~sed foods when there is a choice and it is e~onomica~y feasible to doof ~ ~ct~on0 the determination of "economically feasible" sh~ll be made by the purchasing publicentity, censlderlng the t~tal cost, quantity, and quality of the food ~nd the budget an4 polk~es,of theentity. " " " .... ¯ ..... ~.’"
CLIAPTER 4.
~’ct/on4100. Short4100~. Ret:~sled.4101. Legi~httive 6nding~ ¯
SUBL~rrtNG AND SUBCONTRACTING .. ,~-~ ~. : .:....
(Added by Stata.198~, +.,. 195, § 42~1.): - : "-" -- ~
I~--Iv~: Gov.C f~ ~ 4101. ~ by S~1~3.~ 21~, i 4.
. PUBLIC CONTI
CODE PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE § 4107
improvement, or a subcontractor licensed by the State of California who, under subcontract to the~ contractor, specially fabricates and ~ a portion of the work or improvement according todetailed drawings contained in the pLans::and specifications, in an amount in excess Of one-half of 1percent of the prime contractor’s total bid pr~ in the case of bids or offers for the constLm, ct~on ofstreets or hlghways~ including brklges~ in excess of one-half of 1 percent of the prime contractor’stotal bki or ten thousand dollars (~10~0001, whichever is greatar.
to) ~ por~on of the work which wil| be done by _~_h subcontractor under.thls act. The primecontractor ~ l~t only one subcontractor for each portion as is defined by the prime eontrac~or inhls or her bid. :{Added by Stat~1986, c. 195, § 42.1. Amended by Stat~1988, ¢- 1578, § SJ
§’4108. Circumvention by prime contractor of requirement to li~t subcontractors b~:’.ll~¯ another conh’actor who will sublet; v/olatlon " -: ~ ~ . ¯ . .. "." . ~" .... ,...
Circumvention by ~ general contractor who bids as pt~ane contractor of the requirement underSection 4104 for him or h~r to [i~t his or her subcontractor~ by the device of.llsti~ aao~ere~atxaetor who will in tara sublet portions cor~ti~a0a~g; theprime contract, shall be considered a viola~on of thia ehaptor and shall subject that prune contractorto the peimltlps ~ey: forthh&,ctions 4110 and 411L ,. ¯. - .’- ~ "’,~ "..
D~/,at/o~ Gov.C. foane~ ~ 4105, added by Sttu.1963,
§ 410~..Fal|ure to specify or specification of more than’one subcontracto~ .l~fo~ta~ce "by¯ . prime contractor . ,-. . . ~. ..:
¯ If a prime dontrsetor fa~s to sperry a subeontrac~or or ~f a prime contractor spodfiea more thanone subcontxa~tor for the same portion of work to be l~.fformed under the contrast in exco~ of one-b~e of 1 pervent of the prime eo.n.tr .w~... r’s total bid, the prime contre~o., r .agrees th~.,t, he or. ehe.,isfully q~l~*’~l to perform that portion himself or ~ and that the prune contractor ~ ..p..erform
~If after award nf contract;,~&e prime contractor subeontra~, except ns provkled for in Sections4107 or 4109, any such portion of the work,-’the L~rlme contractor
~¯(a) Sul~tituteany potion ns mubeontractor in pI~e nf.the ~ubo0ntra~cor ~l~n the.ri~ bid,except that the awarding &uthorilT,or.its duly uthorized-offlcer; tna~, e~copt as other~i~
.~-~.-.’- (11 W~u the mbcontra~tor listed.in the.bkl after
§ 4107 PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE
-terms, ooadlt/ons, plane and speclt-~ions for the project involved or the terms of that subcontrac-tot’s written bid, is pre~mted to the subcontractor by the prime contractor.
(2) When the listed suhco..utr~ctor becomes bankrupt or insolvent.O) When the listed subcontractor f~a’is or refuses to perform his or her subcontracL
... (4) When the listed subcontractor fa,qa or refuses to meet the bond requirements of the primecontractor ~m ~et forth in Section 410~. .
(b9 When the.prime contractor demonstrate~ to the tward~,f authoHty, or its duly ,uthorizedofficer, subject to: the further provisions ~et forth in Section 4107.5, that the ,~me of ~tbosubcontractor was listed a~ the result of an inadvertent clerical error.. -
(6) When the listed su .t~m. tractor.is not l~e~ed pursuant to the Contractors L~. Law.09 When the awar~,g authority, or its duly authorized officer, determln¢* that the work
performed by the listed subcontractor, is ~ulmtantlally unsatisfactory tad not in anlmtantial¯ a~ordanoe with the ~ tad spe~Bentions, or that the eubcon ~tr~Aor is sulmta~6~!!y delaying or
disrupting the progre~ of the wort~ - -~ to appi~v~l of the prime cot~tr~e~__ _ntas request for the substitution the awarding anthority,.or its.duly authorized officer, ~hall give notice in w~iting to the lkted subcontractor of the primecontractor’s request to tutmtitttte mad of the reasons for the request. The notice slmll I~ ~twed by¢ert~<l or registered tnall to the la~ known.address of the subcontractor. ~=ae listed subcon~o~rwho has been ~o notified akt~l have fivd wort4n~¢ days within which to submit written objections tothe substitution to the awa~|-~ tuCJaority. Fa~ure t~ fde these written objections sh~ constitutethe lkted suboontractor’s consent to the sulmtitut~en.-..,. If wrV#ea.obje~o.~. ~ ~ the aw~r~-~ authority *hail give notioe i~ writhe.of at least fiveworld,~ days to.the listed subcontractor of a hearing .by the awarding authorlty.on the primec?. ntractor’s ~quest for sub~ti~n.
anyone other th~ "the brlg~al subcontractor listed in the original bkl~ without the con~ent of ~the&wardL~’&ut~ority~ ~ ~ du~ ~authorL~:I off, let. " .... ~ ":
odg~! contr~ sublet or subcon~-act any l~rtiou of the work in ex__~e~__ of en _e~!f of. I percent ofthe prime contntctor’s torSI bid as to which his Or~ex original bid did not designate a sbbcontractor.
§ 4107.5. Clahn of in:
The prime contractorsubcontractor shahauthority give writtensubcontractor he orthe pdme ~ntract~r pr
Any listed sub¢ontra,~ection a~ to an inadvepdme bkl ope,~’withwritten_ ob~szt~n to thesubcon~:tor to fileor her agreement that
The awarding suthori:of comp~ll;n~ reasons
" {a) If (1) the prime tor each submit anpartie~ may wish toaffidavi~ from each ofprlm~ bkl ¢~:~ming, or
(b) If the affidavitsthe spech~ed time butdoes not submit withinwrL~_e~ objection to
d~_L,n of inedverten~’cleraml ~ hold & public h,Any deter,~on
te~tlmeny of other contrfacts which may have a(Added by Stats.lSS~,
wns’te to
was~ cann to pay a subcof the Hezlth and
CODE
~ontrae-
§ 4107.7 PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE
d~posal is completed, the subcontract may serve a stop notice upon the public enti~ in az:cordancowith Chapter 4 (commencing with Se~on 3179) of Title 15 of P~rt 4 of Division 3 of the C~v~ Code.~Added by Stats.1987, ~ 746, §
§" 4~0~ Fat~hfuI pe~orman~e and payment bonds ~f ~b~atractor~ - ¯ . . ...
(a) It shall be the respoas~b~ty of each sabconiractor aubmit~ing bids to a prime contractor to prepared to sub~t & faithful performance a~l payment bend or.bends ~f ~o requested by the prlme
(b) In the event any subcontractor aubmR~ing a bid to ~ prime contractor d~es "not,’~pon therequest of the prhne contractor and at the expense of the prhne coatractor at the e~bllshed chargeor premium therefor, furakh to the p~me contractor a bend or bonds issued by an ~l ~uretywhereh the l~hne eoatractor shall be ~-~t the obliges, guaranteeh~ prompt ~ ~thfnlpe~or~co of the subenatract and the payment of all claims for labor ~i materhls furahhed or~ in ~ about the work to be done and performed under the aubamir~__~..i~e.prhne contractor-may reject the bid s~i .~e a sub~(itutlon af another subcontractor.anbjec~.to Se~io.." n 4107.
:: (c)(D The bond or bonds may be req~ked : " " under .this ~don only if the prhne contractor inida or her wrli~n or published "request for eubbids " " clearly specifies the amount andrequirements of the bond or bonds. : ......... ": ....
"’={2) If the ~nse of the bond or bonds .required under this s~Jon is to be bo~ne bytheeubcontractor~ that requirement shall also be specified in the prime contractor’s written or pub~hed
sion, in the written or published request for suhbids sh~ll preclude the prime contractor from/m~g bond requ/rements under this set,on. -. . ....(Added by’Sts~:]~86, ~ 195, ~ 4~L Amended by Stat~.19~l, ~. 7,~4 (S.B.~S0),.~ L) "~"
:~ :.. . .... total bid (o which no subcontractor we~ designated in original bid . ....
Sublettln~ or subcontracting of any portion of the work in exce~ of un~-haif of 1 percent O~ the~rime contractor’s total bid an to which no subcon~_~_or w~ des~mstod in the or~ohnl bid ~/u onlybe ~ in cases of public emergency or nece~ity, and then only after a ~;-_~ reduced to~fin~ ~ ¯ public record clothe.awarding &uthority.~-~in~forth the f__~_ eonsGh~n~ the
§ 4110. Viola~loa~ of ~ and coatract~; ean~llafloa
A prime contractor .viob~ any of the provision~ of this -~.,~ter ~iolate~ ~dsor ~n: ~ontract and.the sw~ authority may exercise the option, in ~ own discretion, of (1).cancel~.hkor-~ercontract or (~) asse~in~ the prhne ~ontractor a ~ty in an amount of not mere than’lO ~e.ntthe amount of.the subcontract involve~ and this ~e_~ty shall be deposited in the fund out of which~ prime contract js a, wardsd., In any proesedin~s under this sec~on the prime ~c~._n.tractor ~ be
PUBLIC CO:
4111. Vlola~
Violation of tof the
.(Ad~ by
POW’EPS AND FUNCT/ONS §1~2
dete~’i,,ines and declares by a two-third~ vote of all of its membersthat, in its opinion, the supplies, equipment, or materials may bepurchased at a lower price in the open market, the commission mayproceed to purchase these supplies, equipment, or materials in theopen market wi.thout further observance of the provisions regardingcontracts, bids, or advertisements.Added Stats 1976 eh 1333 § 16.
Collateral References:A.~ Jut 2d bl,,n~cipal Corporations, Coaaties, and Other Political Subdiv~ioas
§§ 493 et seq.
§§ 130224-130230. [No sections of these numbers.]
§ 130231. Construction of exclusive public mass tran.~it guidewaysystem(a) If the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission is autho-rized to impose a transactions and usetax within the County of LosAngeles, the commission shall have the authority and power vested inthe Southern California t~pid Transit District to plan, design, andconstruct an exclusive public mass transit guideway system in thecounty.(b) In that case, the commission shall conform to this article letting contracts for the construction of that system.Added Stats 1986 ¢h 195 § 137.1.
Prior Law:
(~) Former Pub Con C § 20361, as added by Stats 1982 ch 465 § 11, amended by Stats 1985ch 775 § I,
(b) Pub UtiI C § 13025.~ subds (a), (b), as ~lded by Stats 1976 ch 1333 § 16.
§ 130232. Competitive bldd~-g for eontrac~ Bid ~eat~i , .
ton of
d;~ may
dolla~ ($1,~), but not ~-~v~ ~o~d dola~ ($~,~), ~¢
~o~d
355
be presented under sealed cowr aud ~_~1! be accomp~ie~l: by one offollowing fo~’,,~ of bidder’s security: ...... " " "" " " ’(I) Cas~ "- " "-" "~-" ::’"~ >: " : ~;" "’ ~" " "
-
(3) Acerdfi~d check n~le payable ~ th~’comm,-,,on..." ’ " " : .. (4) A bidder’s bond.executed by an ~.tted surety insurer, ~.~tO tJ~e ¢::omm~S~Oll. .......... :: " " " " "" ""
¯ , . : .: .,, ,,::- ..- :,~.’~- ,,. - :.:.’, .’,~’-.-.,.*’- . ,~-:--’- .’~-. [
UpOn ~ ~w~_rcl to the l~west bidder,, the security of an ~_m.cuocessfid bid-¢~,~! be returned in ~ re~sonabie peri~l of t~me, but in n.o event ~h,.!! tsec’~ty be held by .t~e cor, m;.*-clon beyo~d 60 days from the t~.m.e..th~: aw
ATTACHMENT D
PCLCONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
BF-Q UST OF PROPOSED SUBCONT~ACTORSISUPPU~RS(All > 0.5% ofTotel Btd Price and All DB~ of Any Contrmm Amount)
Contact Pmr~on:
Uc~na8 No:
License Expire$~
Nsme:
Address:
poller Velu@ of Work % of Total Bid’
DEIE CurrentlyCer~ified~: Yes ~ No DCertifyingAgen~ya:
Contact Person:
Telephone:
License No:,
Licen.~ e Exl~ires:
_.DJ~l_~r_ Velum of Work
DBE CurrentlyCertified: Ye~ [3 No 0CertifyingAgency:
_% of Totel Bid
.%
t Cred’rt fo~ the I~r~dl~tio~ of a DBE Sup~ie~ of m~aflals, sugpli~, ~, e~a~. nnd /or saml~
and suool,es o~ained from a DBE Cman~=m~rEo or ~om ~ DUE 5uoolmr who sub~amcagv ~l~ers the
~ti~ =~11 n~ ~ ¢o~ed toward me~ng ~ DBE G~I= I( ~y =r~ n~ ~fied ~ to ~ ~nd of ~e
= ~ing =gend~ ~re I~ed in ~ Subc~a~ ~nd Supplier~ I~o~.
M’TA EZ71 BF-2:1 I~;~UED:
PCL CONSTRUCTIONBiddm’; L SERVICES, INC.
US’I" OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS(All > 0,B% of Total Bid Price and All DBE= of Any Contract Amount)
N~me:., ~C ~"r’T- ~’.:.r~,,o,~L:.,7 D~:;~r~’ion of Wo~ to bc P=rlo.~r~. ~#
Contact Person: .,,
Telephone: _ --
License No:
Ucense Expires:
¯ Dollar Value_of Work % of Totzl_Bi~~
¯ .... ~ %~o--~.~ ~ ~ %
- DeE CurrentlyC~ffi~d=: Y~ D No ~ ~
Ag~n~" ,., ~/~..
Name:
Address:
Contact Person:,
Telephon~:.,
Dollar Value of W, ork ~ of’~o~al Bid
$ , %
License No:, DBE CurrentlyCertified: Yes ITI No OCertifyingAgengy:~ ,
~ Credh f~ ~ I~rdc~p,ttJe~n of ~ DBE Sug~i=~ of n~c~, ~p~i~, ~, =~, and /or~ to ~ ~l~l~ed ~ tollow=: SI~ ~r~ 160%} of ¢x~nd~rels} for m~d~ls ~nd~es r~d~e C9~= =nd o~i~d ~-~ reou~a~ dez!Er’: o~ hunored ~ (100%) o( ex~d~i for m~r~als
~d~ =~11 n~ ~ c~ed tower= toeing ~ DeE G~I= If ~y are h~ ~fiad ~ to ~ end of
~ ~ing agen~ ~re I~ed in ~ Subc~ua~o~ =nd Suppli~t¢ I~.
MTA B171 BF-31 |~$UFO: 08.30,~-1
PCL CONSTRUCTION SERV]CZS, INC,.Biddy: , - ,.
LIST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS(All > O,6~ of Tote[ Bid Pri:m and All OB~ of Any Condom Amount)
Telephone: _
Llcen=e No: ....
LJcenae
DBE CurrentlyCertified=: Ya= E} No p~Certff,AnOAgency=:_ , ,,~//~
Subcot~t~’ectarE] Regular Dc~,lef~ M~nu’f~c~urer[gHULL, __ I a ii .. i i I .~. i I _ _ i ii I J ....
Name: ..,
DOIIBr V~lu_: of Werk
~o, ~o~_t~o o~i~d ~ e "re~l=r 0ealpr~.~e ~’andred~r~ (I 00%) of ex~nd~e(~ ~ o~ained from a DBE "m~n~re~ o~ Worn = DBE ~u=oi~sr, who ~ub~m=afiVmateH~efbre retie. - ---
= ~ing agen~ ire I~d in ~ Sub=~or~ and Suppller~
MTA 11271 ;~F-31 I~;8UED~ 0£.30.83
E~dd~: PCL CONSTRUCTIO~ SERVICES, ~NC.
BF-Q UST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRAC’r’ORS/SUPPUERS(All > 0.5% of Totel Bid Price end All DBE~ of Any ContTact Amount)
Address;
Co~tactPmrKon;
Tmlephone:,
License No:
bOIIsr V~lu: of Work .% of Total B!d~
DBE CurrentlyCertified~: Yes Q No {~_Certi~in0~,~en~" ~J/A, ,,
Contact Person: ~--~: ...........
Telephone:
Ucen~e No:
License Explres: ~ _
Subcontractor~ Regular D~lcrE) M=nuf=ctu~er~
DBE Cu~entlyCeRffied: Yes ~ No QCe~ifyingAgency: ..
MTA B.271 BF-.~I ISSUED: 08.30.B3
_P_CL CORSTRUCTION SERVICES,
BFoQ us’r OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORSISUPPUERS(Aft :> 0,5 % of Tot~l Bid Price and All DBE$ of An)" Contract Amount)
Name: _ _~o~2-#~Ot ~! Descdodon of Work to be Porformcd
I
Contact Pmr~on:
Telephone:
License No:
ReOul~r Deo)er~ M~,nufacturerr’l
Address:
Work % of Total Bid~
DBE CurrontlyCertifiedZ: Yes C) No,~CerdfyinoAgency~’
Contact Person:
Telephone:
Ucense No:L ....
I.Jc~nse Expires:
Subcon’cractorF3 t~egular be~ler~ ~nuf~cturcr(~
DollBr.val_u~_of_W_ork _%. pf Tot~J.B!d
~ %
DBE CurrentlyCertified: Yes E] No E]CertifyingAgenc~
¯ t .Credit fo¢ th.e I~dC~t~o~_ ¢f ~ DeE Sup~ie~ of m~ad~ls. ~p~l~, ~, e~ui~, and lotIs to ~ ~l~e~ =~ (~low~: ~i~ ~r~ (GO~l of e~nd~rel=~ for m~at~ ~nd ~uo~is$ reo~re~~.C_=~m and o~l~d ~ e "reoular d~=ler~. ~ hu~¢d:~rcem (109%l o1 ex~nd~elsl 1or
~d~O~ s~ll n~ ~ co~¢d tow=td m¢~ng ~ DeE G~I] ~ ~y ire n~ ~fied ~ to ~ end of
= ~lng agan~ are I~sd In ~ Subclass= and Suppli~r~ Ir~,
Biddar’, PCLCONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
UST OF PROPOSr:D SUBCONTI~CTORSISUPPLIERS(All > 0,5% of Total Bid Price ~nd All DBE= of Any Contract Amount]
Cont~ Per=an:
T~l~hone:
License Na:,
LJcertse Expires:
Subcordt’actor~ Regular De=l~~r~ Monu(~ctuferI-I
D¢~cd~lon of Work to bc p.¢dorrncd
Address:
Subcorrtr~ ct orl-I Regular Dezlet C]
~ollar V~lu8 of WorJ~
DBE CurrentlyCertified: Yas [3 No 13CertifyingAgency;
t Credi~ for the pardd~tJon of ~ DBE Suppller~ of m~cdal=, ~p~i~, W~, e~pm~, and lot
~e Co~= ~nd o~i~d ~~ai ~@~r’: o~ 5~dred ~rce~(i 00%) o[¢x~nd~r¢(~)
materials b~torc.r~=l¢, --
= If DBE i= n~ ~e~y ~fled, li~ ~te DBE h,gdi~ was ~ed, DBE Su5c~,b’=~or~uD@i=r~on =~11 n~ ~ ¢~ed toward toeing ~ DeE G~t¢ H ~y ar¢ ~ ~isd ~or ~o ~ end of~d eval~on
h,~A B2.71 B~.]I 1S~UED: 08,30,~1~
B~dd,.f; PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
LIST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS(All > 0.5% of Total Bid Price and All DBE~ of Any Contrac~ Amount)
Addres=: ....
Co~¢t Permon: . D f . % of Totml ~1~~
License No: ................. DeE Currently
Name:
Address: .-
Contac~ Person: Dollar Value of ~Vork
Telephone: .......... $ ....
License No:. . , - DeE CurrentlyCertified; Yes ~ No D
Ucdnse ’ .~plrss, - _ - Co~i~lngAgency: .,
% of Tots1 Bid
is ~ .Credit for the I~rti.clpad0~ .of a DBE Supdlers of. m~er~l~, .tupp~l~s, t~uc~., eclu~pm~¢ and lot ~ervlc~s
~ M DeE ~ m~ ~e~y ~fled, I1~ ~te DBE A~i~ was Su~d, DeE ~b~,b~t~up~i~t ,.~d~d~ =~11 n~ ~ c~ted toward me~ng ~ DeE G~ It ~y =re n~ ~fied ~ to ~ end of ~
~ ~ng =~n~ =re I~ed In ~ Sub=~m~¢s and Sup~iem I~,
¯ dd.r:.PCL, CONSTRUCTION. . . ,,, SERVICES, INC.
BF-Q UST OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPlIERS(All > 0,5% of Total Bid Price and All DBEs of Any Contract Amountl
Name: #~o ~,,J Pe~rlotion of Work to I~ ~erformed
Address: SA/ ~ L I M O
Contaot Person:
Telephone:
License No:,
Name:
Dq!Isr VBlue of Work
_ Hid,
DBI: Currenlly "Certlfied~: Yes ~ No rl ..C~rtifyino
_~_of Total Bid_~
_DescfloliorL of V~ark ~9 t~ P:Ffgrqlcd
Address: ,
Contact Person:
Telephone,"
License No<"
License Expires:
Sub¢orrl~=ctmrl~ Regulmr l)~il=rl~
,Dollar Vii u~. of Wgrl~
DeE CurrentlyCertified: Yes O No E] ..CertifyingAgency: ....
I t .Credit for the plrtJdp~tl¢~ of ¯ DBE Suppller~ of. mm~ls, zup#i~, ~t e:~z~l and /~ se~l~:s to ~ ~l~ed =i fallows: SI~ ~(~ I~0~t _Ol.exwnd~rel~l f~ m~dilS .In0 ~o~l~ reD,red ~der
m~te~iti ~fme re~l~. " -
i If DeE ~ n~ ~e~y ~fii~, I~ ~te DeE ~p#l~l~ w~s ~l~d. DeE Sub~3b-am~/Sup~isr~~ i~ll n~ ~ ~¢d toward me~ng ~ OBE G~II 1( ~y ire n~ ~ed ~ to ~ end of ~d eval~ ~doa,
MTA B~.71 BF-3:1 ISSUED;
8Jdd~r: PCLCORSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
BF-Q UET OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS|All > 0,5% of To~l Bid Pdce and All DI~E~ of Any Contract Amount)
pgll~r Valu~ of Work
Contact Per=on:
Telephone:
Ucense No:
Uc~nse Expires:
.Subconiu’ac’tor~;~. P, egb4ar Ottaler~ M~nufacturer~
DBE CurrentlyCertified; Yes I~ NO []Certlfs, ingAgency:
.% of To;al. Bid
t Credit lot th~ l~rddpa~loo of =DBE Sup~le~ of m~edall, tupelo, ~, aqulpme~ and I~
~ ~o~= =nd o~i~d ft~ ~/.r=~ d~aler’: ~ h~dred ~r~m.(100%} of
m~n~ls ~e resalo, - ..........
MTA e27~ BF-~I IE~,UEO: 0@.~.0.93
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, It~C.
BF-Q US’/" OF PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS/SUPPLIERS(All > 0.5~ of Total Bid Price and All OBE~ of Any ConVict Amount}
N~me: [~/A~w’~_ Do~cflodon of Wo~ 1o bo Porformed
Dollar Value of Work % of Total.~_idt
~_~,~,~ .
DBE CurrentlyCertified=: Yes 0 No~.CertifyingAo,,ncy~._ . _ /J/A" _
Contact P~r~;on:
Telephone:
License No: ,.,
Uc~ns~ Expi~e~:
.Subcont~=ctor~;~ Regular Dcalerl-I t~nufactu~erO
,Dollar, Va d ~ Of W~[k .% of ToTal_ Bid
DBE CurTentlyC~rtified: Yes J~ No 0CectlfyinoAgency:
h~i’A B271 BF-31 ISSUED: 08.30.93
PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.~ddm-: --
BF-O. UST OF: PROPOSED SUBCONTFba, CTOi:~/SUPPLIEI:~(All > O,B% of Total Bid Pdca ~nd JAil Dt]E~ cf Any Contract Amount}
Name: , VALVERDE(~T~,UCI-IONc-,~ P~.~i~on of Work to .l:m ~Horm_m_d.
Addrems: 12402 PHILADELPHIA ST. UTILITIES
WHITTIER, CA 9_0601
Contm~ Pmraon: , EDWARD VALVERDE
TelmphmnB: (310) 693-2763
License No: 276469
Lloense Expire~: ~3/94
Subc;ort1~’=ctor~]’/Regulat De~lerr-I Manu~cturetE]
Name: ** SEE NEXT PAGE
CurrentlyCelXffied~: Ya= ~ No 0CertifyingAgenoy~. LACTC
FOR ADDITX.QNAL DBE’S **
Address:
.N/A
Contact Pmraon: . N/A Dgllar Va_lue of Work " % of Total Bid
Telephone: .... N/A $. ,N/A NIA %
Ucense No: N/A .... :, DBE CurrentlyCertified: Yes 0 No 0
LIc~nme Expire=: N/A CertifyingAgent-y: . N/.~
N/A . ..
Subconttmcto¢t-I Regular [)ealmt(~ Manufacturmr[~
MTA B271 BF-,11 ISSUED: 08.30.g3
ATI’AC~MENT F
BID
BRIEFING SUMMARYCONTRACT B271, HOLLYWOOD/WESTERN STATION
EVALUATION OF DBE GOAL ATTAINMENT OF PCL CONSTRUCTION
25 % DBE GOAL
SUBCONTRACTORNAME
COWELCO
SUBCONTRACTOR’SSCOPE OF WORK
SUBCONTBID
AMOUNT
STEEL FABRICATION
SUBCONTDBE
STATUS
CERT. DBE $700.000
60 or100%CREDIT
100%
DBECREDIT
(DOLLARS)
$700,000
DBE PERCENTCREDIT NOT
(%) CREDITED
1.91% N/A
RENO METAL METALS CERT.DBE $910,000 100% $910,000 2.48% N/A
TRI-CITY REINFORCING STEEL CERT.DBE $3,700,000 100% $3,700,000 10.10% N/A
UTILITIES CERT.DBE 0% * $0 0 1.20%$440,000
$1,200,000
$420,000
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL PRODS
100%
VALVERDE/WEISSKER
6O%
$144,000
SANDERS ENGNRNG $1,200,000
$252,000SOUTHERN AGENTS
CERT. DBE 3.28%
O.69%
0.11%
GEOFON
CERT. DBE
N/A
COMMENTS
* Not a JV &can’t list 2 subsfor same work. Nocredit
Supplier
AEC ELECT/EQUIP MFG. CERT. DBE $40,000 100% $40,000 N/A
D & N CONCRETE CONCRETE RDY-MIX CERT. DBE $2,000,000 60% $1,200,000. 3.28% ~ .Supplier
INCLINOMETERS "MBE" 0% ** $0 0 0~38-%
COAST CERT. DBE 82,500,000 $0 0 *** No WorkScope listed.Prime mustperform. No credit
** Certified"MBE" No credit
$8,002,000 21 8,4,% 11,0~%
Page I-6 UMTA C 4220.IB5-5-88
should be avoided" if at all--possible.- FWHerr~ l~-:c.is~ ~mpractlcal- or- unecon0~ical to make~ a" cle~~r¯ and. ac~ura£ e d~scripti’~ of the technicalreq~lirements, a-."brand ham4 ’or ~equ~l"description may be used: .A grantee shall hse a"brand na=e or equal" description only when itcould not provide an adequate specification ormore detailed description, other than byinspection and analysis, in time for the
acquisition under consideration. Further, agrantee wishing to use "brand name or equal"must caref,~ly identify its minim~m n-eeds andclearly set forth those salient physical andfunctional characteristics of the brand nameproduct in the solicitation; and
Identify al{ requirements that’the offerors mustfulfill and all other factors to be used inevaluating bids or proposals.
Grantees will ensure that all prequalified lists bfpersons, fixms, or products that are used inacquiring goods and services are current and includeenough qualified sources to ensure maximum open a/hdfree competition. Also, grantees will not precludepotential bidders from qualifying during thesolicitation period.
METHODS OF .PROCUREMENT. The following methods ofprocurement may be used, as appropriate:
Procurement by small purchase procedures. Smallpurchase procedures are those ~elatively simple andinformal procurement meehods for securing services,supplies, or other property that do not cost morethan~2S-,000 in the aggregate. If small purchaseprocur~ments are used, price or rate quotations willbe obtained from all adequate ntlmber of qualifiedsources.
Procurementby sealed bids (formal advertisinq).Bids are publlcly sollclted and a flrm flxed-prioecontract (l,~mp s~ or unit price) is a~arded to theresponsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all thematerial teams and conditions of the invitation forbids, is the lowest in price~ The sealed bid methodis the-preferred method fom-procuring~66nstldlction~"if the conditions in this subparagraph apply.-
(i) ~ In orde~ for-sealed bi~di~’~ t~ be feasible, thefollowing conditions should be present:
5-5-88Page I-7
A complete, adequate, ~nd realisticspecification or purchase description isavail~hle;
Two Or more responsible bidders are willingand able to compete effectively for thebusiness;
(c) The procurement lends itself to a fiimfixed price contract a/3d the selection ofthe successful bidder ca/3 be madeprincipally on the basis of price; and
(2) If sealed bids are used, the followingrequirements apply:
The invitation for bids will be publiclyadvertised and bids shall be solicited froman adequate n1~mher of known suppliers,providing them sufficient time prior to thedate set for opening the bids;
(b) The invitation for bids, which will includeany specifications and pezLinentattachments, shall define the items orservices sought in order for the bidder toproperly respond;
(c} All bids will be publicly opened at thetime and place prescribed in the invitationfor bids;
(d) A fixed-price contract award will be madein writing to the lowest responsive andresponsible bidder. Where specified inbidding doc~ments, factors such asdiscounts, transportation costs, and lifecycle costs shall be considered indete1"mining which bid is lowest. Paymentdiscounts will only be used to determinethe low bid when prior experience indicatesthat such discotunts are usually takenadvantage of; and
(e) Any or all bids may be rejected if there
Procurement by competitive proposal. The technique6f competitive proposal is normally conducted withmore than one source submitting a proposal, andeither a fixed price or cost reimbursement typecontract is awarded. It is generally used whenconditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed
7-22-$8
General. It is the r~sponsibility of UM~A to ensur~ that ~ arein ~*~liance with all civil rights prrx/ram recf~i~--~nts that ’apply tot~nsit relat~_ projects. ~he applicable-civil-rights progrBm are~__sfollow:. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (ServiceDelivery/~enefits) ; Equal Employment .O~ty (~90); D~adv~ged B~i~ En~rpri~ (n~_.) Pr~z~m (Sec~on i06(c)); the Hardic~r{3ed .R~]ulation .(Section 504).
Do Nor~i~crimination. Section 19, enact~ as part of the StlrfaceTr-~nsportation Assistance Act of 1978, states that no person on thebe_sis of race, color, creed, natioma] origin, sex, or age, sb~]l beexcluded f~LL F~_rticipation in, be denied the benefits of, or besubject to M~c~rimination under any project, program, or activityfunded in whole or in part tl~o~gh financial a~istance under the UM~Act of 1964, as amended.
This nor~scrimination provision applies to ~loyment ard businessopportunities and is to be ccnsidered in addition to the provisions ofTitle VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Title VI (Service Delivery/Benefits). Each grantee requesting Federalfinancial assistance pur~nt to Sections of the UM~ Act covered bythis circular, Federal Aid Urban Systam ’(FAUS) Transit ~jects andInterstate Transfer .I>~cgrams, must have a Title VI s~b~ission approvedby ~ as specified in UMTA circular 4702. i, entitled "Title VIPrtx/ram Guidelines for Urban Ma~s ~rtation Recipients."
Once the initia/ Title VI sulmzissions have b~en approved, updat~.s areredhaired avery 3 years unless otherwise request~ by UM~A.
~Eq~l Employment Opportunity (EEO). Gz~Ycees with 50 or more ~loyeesthat have received within the previous Federal fiscal year capitaland/or operating assistance grants of over $i million, or technicalshales 9~nts totalling over $250,000,-must have their EEO programsapproved by UMTA. This r~qu~ent also applies to co**tract~rs (withmore than 50 employees) that are engaged in providing tz-dnsit servicesand receive some fur~ under Federal gr~nt assistance. ESO programr~q,~i.~e/~t_s ~ specified in I~fEA circular 4704.1, entitled "Eq~
Employment Opportunity Program GuidelJ_nes for ~ Recipients."
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Proqramo ~ mustthe re~)i~ements of the Depatb~ent of Tr-dnsportation’s (IX)T) MinorityBusir~_R Enterprise Regulation (49 CFR Part 23) and Section i06(c) the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of1987 (S%X/RAA), enacted 4-2-87. D~E progYam r~q~i;-~ents al~ specifiedin the ~t version of UMTA ciroilar 4716.1A, entitled, ’~Z~ADisadvantaged Business Enterprise Re~i~aments for Recipients ardTransit Vehicle Manufacturers.~’ Section I06(c) req,]i~es that not lessthan I0 percent of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under
Vertical line denotes change.
ATTACHMENT H
* * REVISED* *
AGENDA ITEM No. 5
CONTRACT No. B271
MTA BOARD MEETINGFEBRUARY 2, 1994
A~AC~4MENT H
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Tcansportation Authority
MINUTES/PROCEEDINGS
Board Meeting .~-Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration
500 West Temple Street, 3rd FloorBoard of Supervisors" Hearing Room
Los Angeles
Thursday, February 4, 1993
Directors Present:
Richard Alat0rreMichael AntonovichTom BradleyEvan Anderson BraudeMarvin BraudeYvonne Brathwaite-BurkeJames Cragin
Alternates Present:
Derrick Oo BostonHal CroytsJane EllisonJan HeidtMarvin L. Holen
Alternate Absent:
A~drea Van de Kamp
Deane DanaEdmthnd D. EdelmanJohn FasanaGloria MolinaMark Ridley-ThomasLarry ZarianJerry Baxter (Ex officio)
Phyllis PapenNick PatsaourasRaul PerezRay Remy
~alled to.orde~ at 10:19 a.m. by Merger Steering Committee(M~C) Chalr Richard Alatorre, as Acting Chair of the
Met~opolitan Transportation Authority (MTA).
Helen M. Bolen, Merger Steering Committee Secretary, as ActingSecretary of the MTA, called the roll and a~ministered theOath of Office to members of the Board of Directors and theiralternates.
b. Eiscussion of MTA initial Rules and Procedures.
Director Antonovich made a motion, seconded by DirectorFasana, that the Chair and Vice Chair term of office be for 60days. Staff to return within that time period with optionsfor city and County rotation of officers and whether the termsof office should coincide with the calendar year or fiscalyear.
Director Bradley suggested that the motion be amended to setthe initial term of office to June 30, 1993. Duringdiscussion, Director Brathwaite-Burke urged the passage of themotion with the June, 1993 date. Following further discussionon the term of office, on a Roll Call vote noted below, theBoard approved the initial term of Chair and Vice Chair toJune 30, 1993.
Ayes: Alatorre, Bradley, E. Braude, M. Braude,Brathwaite-Burke, Dana, Edelman, Moling,Ridley-ThomasAntonovich, Cragin, Fasana, ZarianNoneNone
Abstain:Absent:
Director Antonovich made a motion to clarify Section 1.6 -Committees (page 3), to be consistent with the action taken establish Committees. The proposed language is, "Committeeappointments are recommended by the Chair and confirmed by theMTA Board." Further, staff will return within the interimperiod with recommendations and comments from the Committeesand Construction Board regarding how they can most efficientlyserve the MTA and what specific authorities could be delegatedunder AB 152. This motion was seconded and unanimouslycarried.
ADOPTED Initial Rules and Procedures, with above amendments.
UNANIMOUS, with 13 Directors present
4c. ADOPTED the DBE/MBE/WBE/EEO Programs.
UNANIMOUS, with 13 Directors present
