November 10, 2017
6085.02
Tamara Rowland
Conwest Development Consultants
250 - 1311 Kootenay Street
Vancouver, BC
V5K 4YR
VIA E-MAIL: [email protected]
Dear Tamara:
Re: Secured Market Rental 100 Project at 3070 Kingsway, Vancouver, BC
Letter Report
Bunt & Associates Engineering Ltd. (Bunt) has prepared the following letter report for the proposed project
at 3070 Kingsway, Vancouver, BC. The City of Vancouver has not specifically requested a Traffic
Assessment & Management Strategy (TAMS) report for the site given the small scale nature of the
development with 40 secured market rental units along with 3,080sq.ft. of ground floor commercial floor
area.
The attached letter report therefore focuses on the key design aspects of the project from a transportation
perspective, and specifically with regard to site accessibility, layout, bylaw requirements, vehicle trip
generation and access design review.
We trust this will help to provide sufficient support to progress the Rezoning Application and please do
not hesitate to contact us should you have any questions or comments.
Yours truly,
Bunt & Associates
Kyle Brandstaetter, MCIP RPP Paul Dorby, MSc
Transportation Planner Senior Transportation Planner
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 2 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
1. INTRODUCTION Conwest Venture Limited has retained Bunt & Associates (Bunt) to provide transportation planning
guidance for the proposed secured rental development, located at 3070 Kingsway in the City of
Vancouver, BC. The project plans for 40 secured rental units along with a small amount of
commercial floor space (3,080 sq.ft.) at the ground level, fronting Kingsway. The site location is
shown at Exhibit 1.1.
The primary aim of this review is to demonstrate that the site access and parking strategy for the
project can function satisfactorily, taking into consideration the site constraints. It will cover
preliminary feedback received from the City of Vancouver, including the traffic management
requirements for the planned single lane ramp.
This letter will form part of the planning submission materials and document existing conditions,
site layout, parking and loading details, site vehicle trip generation, ramp operation and general
design.
2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is located on the south side of Kingsway between Rupert Street and Kerr Street
and is served by a rear laneway with connections to School Avenue and Rupert Street (right-in/out
only).
The site is currently occupied by a small commercial premise with 12 surface parking spaces at
the front, and accessed directly from Kingsway, along with 8 surface parking spaces at the rear
and accessed from the laneway. The existing building and surface parking will be removed with
the project development along with the existing driveway onto Kingsway.
2.1 Site Accessibility
Site accessibility by walking, cycling and transit is summarized in Table 2.1 for the project using
the ‘walkscore’ results along with current travel modes observed in the area from residents.
Table 2.1: Walkscore Review
MODE WALK-SCORE
MODE SPLIT* DETAILS
Walk 87% 15% to19% Very Walkable – most errands can be accommodated on foot
Cycle 86% 4% to 5% Very Bikeable - mostly flat excellent bike lanes
Transit 81% 17% to 22% Excellent Transit convenient for most trips *Source: Transportation Panel Survey 2014 FINAL REPORT
Walkscore confirms the accessibility of the site is high for walking, cycling and transit with all
scoring above 80%. This provides important context for the proposed allowable parking reduction
&6085.02
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning
N
Scale: NTS
Use these lens blocks to highlight multiple sites Please use yellow if there is only one site
Exhibit 1.1
Site Location
November 2017
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial
Collector
Local
Railway
ProposedExisting
Use this font and size for road names
LANEWAY
KINGSWAY
Leader Line
CLASS BLOADING
PARKADE RAMP
Cyclist Access
Class B Bike Parking
SITE
TJOYCESTATION
Ruper
t St
reet
Kingsway
E. 41st Avenue
Joyc
e St
reet
School Avenue
Kerr
Str
eet0,000
(0,000)
(0,000)0,000
88
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
(000) 000
0,000 (0,000)
0,000(0,000)
88
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
0,000(0,000)
(0,000)0,000
88
000(000)
(000)000
000(000)
000 (000)
0,000 (0,000)
0,000(0,000)
88
000(000)
(000) 000
(000)000
000 (000)
0,000 (0,000)
0,000(0,000)
0,000(0,000)
(0,000)0,000
88
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)(000)
000
(000)000
000(000)
000 (000)
000
0000,000
0,000
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( ) 0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31A
0.31A
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31A
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( ) 0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31A
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31A
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
For HCM 2000 unsignalized intersections,
choose the circle below without the overall
v/c metric in the centre of the circle.
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( ) 0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
A
Please align arrowheads when creating lane
groups not present in this template as shown
below using grid guides.
Note: Arrows reflect “Lane Groups” defined
by Synchro and NOT roadway laning.
Please align arrowheads when creating lane
diagrams not present in this template as
shown below using grid guides.
Draw Freeway - assign 6.0pt black
Duplicate line with ”+” - assign 0.5pt white
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Intersection #
Link Volumes
Unsignalized
000(000)
00
00000000
AMPM
AMPM Intersection Volumes
Intersection #
00
000(000)
AMPM Intersection Volumes
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Unsignalized
00
00
00
Two Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Storage Length (m)(#) (#)
Existing Proposed
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial
Collector
Local
Railway
Two Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
ProposedExisting
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial
Collector
Local
Railway
Two Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Existing
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial Road
Collector Road
Local Road
Road style 1
Road style 2
Road style 3
Railway
Unsignalized
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Existing Proposed
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial Road
Collector Road
Local Road
Road style 1
Road style 2
Road style 3
Railway
Unsignalized
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Existing
Draw railway alignment assign 1.0pt black
Draw 0.05” ticks at start and end assign 0.5pt black
Use “Blend”, drag from first tick to second tick and set path
to follow railway alignment. Adjust count so spacing is 0.2”
LOS A to D V/C < 0.85 LOS E 0.85 < V/C < 0.90LOS F V/C > 0.90
0.89
C
0.9
1
F()
0.54 B( )
0.8
6E() *
Lane Group LOS
Lane Group V/C
Lane Group
Overall V/C
Overall LOS
th95 % Queue
exceeds available
storage
2 Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Intersection #
Link Volumes
00000000
000(000)00000000
AMPM
AMPM Intersection Volumes
00
Legends for Future Conditions Legends for Existing Conditions
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 4 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
for secured rental and the following provides specific details on cycling and transit facilities close
to the site.
Cyclists generally travel 3 to 4 times the distance of pedestrians for the same period of travel time
and would indicate a 4 to 5 kilometre distance is reasonable for trips made from the site by
bicycle. City bicycle routes close to the site are summarized in Table 2.2 and it highlights there
are connections in both an east-west and north-south direction.
Table 2.2: Bicycle Routes
ROUTE DIRECTION COMMENTS
Vanness bikeway east-west forms part of the BC parkway;
Earle Street / Vivian Drive north-south Low volume / residential
East 45th Avenue east-west Low volume / residential
Transit access in the vicinity of the site is summarized in Table 2.3 and it confirms there are two
‘distinct bus services that run east-west and north-south’ as per the accessibility requirement for a
parking reduction with secured rental units. Equally important, the Joyce SkyTrain Station is within
800-metres of the site and this should have a stronger influence with encouraging transit use.
Table 2.3: Transit Route Frequency
REFER-ENCE
NAME WEEKDAY AM PEAK
WEEKDAY MID-DAY
WEEKDAY PM PEAK
WEEKDAY EVENING
WEEKENDMID-DAY
Expo Line Waterfront/King George 2-4min 6min 2-4min 6min 6-8min 19 Vancouver Downtown/Metrotown 12min 12min 12min 12min 12min 41 Joyce Station/Crown/UBC 4-5min 5-7min 8-10min 10min 8-15min
3. PROPOSED SITE PLAN REVIEW The planned site floor areas are presented in Table 3.1 for each land use along with a description
of what is planned.
Table 3.1: Proposed New Land Uses
LAND USE BUILDABLE FLOOR AREA DESCRIPTION
Secure Market Rental 3,248 sq.m. (34,964 sq.ft.) 40 residential units, including 3 townhouses
Commercial 286 sq.m. (3,080 sq.ft.) Small street-fronting commercial units
Vehicle access for the site will be from the rear laneway where a single lane ramp (3.65-metres
wide) is planned to serve 24 parking spaces located on a single underground level.
The single lane ramp is needed given the limited site width available for parking and access. This
matter has been discussed with City staff as part of the pre-application discussions. A technical
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 5 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
review to support the single lane ramp is provided in Section 6 based on the expected peak-hour
volumes and vehicle design sizes.
Public realm along the site’s frontage on Kingsway will be enhanced with the removal of the
existing driveway, providing 1 to 2 street parking spaces (off-peak). The planned width for the
sidewalk and landscaping will be 4.1-metres together with a 1.4-metre set-back.
Class-A bicycle parking storage area will be located on the west side of the P1 level. It can be
accessed either at the front of the building, through foyer and using the elevator, or from the rear
laneway where there is passageway and access to stairs (see Exhibit 3.1). Cyclists are not
expected to use the vehicle ramp given the complexities expected with the proposed ramp
signalization (see Section 6 for details) and it would be more prudent to provide other options as
mentioned.
Class-B bicycle parking spaces will be located within the site at the entrance way to the residential
foyer (see Exhibit 3.1).
A Class-B loading space is planned at the rear laneway to serve the commercial use primarily, but
it would be available for use by residents (even though there is no specific requirement). The
Class-B requirement is only marginal for the site and this is discussed in the next section.
4. SITE PARKING AND LOADING REVIEW Summarized in the following paragraphs are the planned vehicle and bicycle parking numbers in
the context of the City of Vancouver’s Bylaw requirements along with service vehicle loading space
requirements.
Table 4.1a summarizes the relevant City’s Parking Bylaw rates for the planned uses, while Table
4.1b summarizes the calculation for the specific requirements along with allowable reductions.
Table 4.1a: City of Vancouver Parking Bylaw Rates (without heritage designation)
LAND USE CITY PARKING BYLAW REQUIREMENT
Secured Market Rental
(minimum)
A minimum of 1 space for each 125 m² of gross floor area, except that if the secured market rental housing is within two blocks of a rapid transit station, or within two blocks of the intersection of two distinct bus routes that run north to south and east to west…the minimum parking requirements is 20% less. A minimum, for visitor parking, of that number of spaces which is equal to 7.5% of the total number of dwelling units in the secured market rental housing.
Commercial A minimum of one space for each 100 square metres of gross floor area up to 300 square metres, and one additional space for each additional 50 square metres of gross floor area.
&6085.02
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning
N
Scale: NTS
Use these lens blocks to highlight multiple sites Please use yellow if there is only one site
Exhibit 3.1
Site Plan
November 2017
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial
Collector
Local
Railway
ProposedExisting
Use this font and size for road names
LANEWAY
KINGSWAY
Leader Line
CLASS BLOADING
PARKADE RAMP
Cyclist Access
Class B Bike Parking
0,000(0,000)
(0,000)0,000
88
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
(000) 000
0,000 (0,000)
0,000(0,000)
88
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
0,000(0,000)
(0,000)0,000
88
000(000)
(000)000
000(000)
000 (000)
0,000 (0,000)
0,000(0,000)
88
000(000)
(000) 000
(000)000
000 (000)
0,000 (0,000)
0,000(0,000)
0,000(0,000)
(0,000)0,000
88
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)
000(000)(000)
000
(000)000
000(000)
000 (000)
000
0000,000
0,000
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( ) 0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31A
0.31A
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31A
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( ) 0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31A
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31A
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
For HCM 2000 unsignalized intersections,
choose the circle below without the overall
v/c metric in the centre of the circle.
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( )
0.3
1
A()
0.31 A( ) 0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
0.3
1
A()
A
Please align arrowheads when creating lane
groups not present in this template as shown
below using grid guides.
Note: Arrows reflect “Lane Groups” defined
by Synchro and NOT roadway laning.
Please align arrowheads when creating lane
diagrams not present in this template as
shown below using grid guides.
Draw Freeway - assign 6.0pt black
Duplicate line with ”+” - assign 0.5pt white
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Intersection #
Link Volumes
Unsignalized
000(000)
00
00000000
AMPM
AMPM Intersection Volumes
Intersection #
00
000(000)
AMPM Intersection Volumes
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Unsignalized
00
00
00
Two Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Storage Length (m)(#) (#)
Existing Proposed
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial
Collector
Local
Railway
Two Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
ProposedExisting
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial
Collector
Local
Railway
Two Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Existing
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial Road
Collector Road
Local Road
Road style 1
Road style 2
Road style 3
Railway
Unsignalized
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Existing Proposed
Freeway
Expressway
Arterial Road
Collector Road
Local Road
Road style 1
Road style 2
Road style 3
Railway
Unsignalized
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Existing
Draw railway alignment assign 1.0pt black
Draw 0.05” ticks at start and end assign 0.5pt black
Use “Blend”, drag from first tick to second tick and set path
to follow railway alignment. Adjust count so spacing is 0.2”
LOS A to D V/C < 0.85 LOS E 0.85 < V/C < 0.90LOS F V/C > 0.90
0.89
C
0.9
1
F()
0.54 B( )
0.8
6E() *
Lane Group LOS
Lane Group V/C
Lane Group
Overall V/C
Overall LOS
th95 % Queue
exceeds available
storage
2 Way Stop
All Way Stop
Roundabout
Pedestrian Signal
Traffic Signal
Intersection #
Link Volumes
00000000
000(000)00000000
AMPM
AMPM Intersection Volumes
00
Legends for Future Conditions Legends for Existing Conditions
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 7 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
Table 4.1b: Project Vehicle Parking Bylaw Review
VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRED PROVIDED NOTES
Secured Rental (including visitor) 26 n/a 3,248 sq.m./125 sq.m
Secured Rental (Transit Proximity) 21 22 20% reduction allowed
Secured Rental Visitor Component 3 3 7.5% of units
Secured Rental Component 18 19 Less visitor
Commercial 3 2 1 parking space shared with res. visitor
Total Spaces 24 24 Inclusive of 2 disability spaces
With Disability Reduction -2 - Spaces double counted
Total Bylaw Requirement 22 - Requirement with allowable reductions
As can be seen, the development will meet the City’s Bylaw minimum requirement and it confirms
there is no need for additional Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures such as a car
share vehicles / spaces, additional bike storage, etc.
Bicycle parking for the project will comply with the City’s Bylaw requirements and a breakdown of
the details is presented in Table 4.2 for each land use while the locations were covered in the
previous section.
Table 4.2: Bicycle Parking Review
LAND USE RATES PLANNED SPACES
CLASS-A CLASS-B CLASS-A CLASS-B
Rental Residential 1.25 per unit 6 per entrance 50 6
Commercial None 6 per entrance 1 0
51 6
Outlined in Table 4.3 is the applicable City of Vancouver loading Bylaw rates for the project and
this has focused on Class-B spaces as Class-A spaces are not required for the uses planned.
Table 4.3: Service Vehicle Loading Bylaw Review
LAND USE BUILDABLE
AREA REF. CLASS B CITY BYLAW RATE REQUIREMENT
Market Residential
3,248 sq.m. or 40 units 5.2.1 No requirement for less than 100 units.
At least one space for 100 to 299 units. 0
Commercial 286 sq.m. 5.2.3
A minimum of one space for the first 465 square metres of gross floor area plus one space for any portion of the next 1,860 square metres and one additional space for each additional
2,325 square metres.
1
One Class-B space is triggered for the commercial use for the first 465 sq.m.; however on other
commercial buildings the actual observed demand rate for Class-B is closer to one space per
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 8 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
5,200 sq. m.. Even though demand is expected to be low, it is planned to provide one Class-B
loading space and where the majority of movements will come from smaller vehicles than a SU9,
which the City typically requests for design testing. This space would be accessed from the rear
laneway and would be available for both commercial and residential uses.
5. PROJECTED NEW VEHICLE MOVEMENTS Presented in Table 5.1a are the proposed vehicle trips rates for the two planned land uses. These
rates are consistent with what has been applied on other projects in the area; however this
residential rate is based on market units which typically have a higher vehicle demand than
secured rental units.
Table 5.1a: Proposed Vehicle Trip Rates for Development
LAND USE AM VEHICLE TRIP RATES PM VEHICLE TRIP RATES
In Out Total In Out Total Residential (per unit) 0.05 0.19 0.24 0.12 0.10 0.22
Commercial (per 1,000 sq.ft.) 0.60 0.37 0.97 1.19 1.52 2.7
Table 5.1b presents the projected number of new site vehicle movements.
Table 5.1b: Proposed Vehicle Trips for Development
LAND USE AM VEHICLE TRIPS PM VEHICLE TRIPS
In Out Total In Out Total Residential (40 units) 2 8 10 5 4 9
Commercial (3,080 sq.ft.) 2 1 3 4 4 8 4 9 13 9 8 17
The residential component is projected to generate a maximum of 10 vehicle movements in the
peak-hour periods and the commercial component, 8 vehicles per hour at peak times. However,
much of this demand could be on-street or perhaps from other site parking close-by as part of a
linked trip with other activities.
Given this, the estimated peak demand at the vehicle access ramp would be closer to 13 vehicle
movements in the peak-hour periods, or 1 vehicle every 5 minutes. In the following section, this
information will be used to provide context for the planned single lane design from the rear
laneway.
6. SITE ACCESS DESIGN REVIEW The project is significantly challenged to provide underground parking due to the narrow site
width available. Given this, Conwest has discussed with the City for the need to have a single lane
ramp and Table 6.1 presents the key features / geometrics.
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 9 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
Table 6.1: Single Lane Ramp Design Features
PARAMETER LAYOUT DETAILS
Vehicle Ramp Rear laneway, single lane at 3.65-metres width and 27-metres in length
Parking Spaces 24 spaces on a single level
Peak In / Out vehicles Morning peak-hour 4 in / 9 out, afternoon peak-hour 7 in / 6 out
Cyclists Separate access to bicycle parking
Acceptance of the single lane ramp from the City will be on the expectation that a ramp warning
light system can be installed to manage vehicle demands entering / exiting in an efficient and safe
manner. The basic principles are set out below while a detailed analysis can be provided with the
DP submission materials, including clearance times and sign-off from a qualified contractor.
It is expected that a ‘Remote Control / Fob’ could be used to activate the warning lights and
electronic gate as there is limited room for detectors or a stop bar on the P1 level given the
limited space available. When the Remote Control / Fob is triggered by a vehicle, the timer will
start based on an appropriate clearance time for a vehicle to:
a) enter and park; or,
b) leave a parking space and enter the laneway.
Visitor access to the residential or commercial parking can be worked out at the DP stage, but it
is expected that drivers using these spaces will park longer than 2-hours and / or be regulars to
the building. This will allow access to be managed and avoid drivers waiting in the laneway
unduly.
The loading space design has been tested using two (2) single unit sized loading trucks (9 metre
and .5 metre); the latter best represents the expected demands given the small scale nature of
the project. This work is shown in Exhibits 6.1a and 6.1b and reflects trucks will need to enter
from School Avenue direction given the restricted movements at Rupert Street.
Ramp access and parking has been tested using a PTAC vehicle (large passenger vehicle) and
smaller passenger vehicles, representative of the 85th percentile and slightly less (i.e. Honda
Accord in small car stalls). This review is presented in Exhibits 6.2a to 6.2f; the range of vehicle
sizes assessed better represents the variety of vehicle types expected to access the site, rather
than just focusing on largest vehicle type. This exercise highlights the constrained width available
and that the suggested traffic signal management system for the ramp would be needed.
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.1aSU9 Loading Maneuver
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]
Lock to Lock Time
SU9
Width
Track
Steering Angle
1.20 6.10
meters
:
:
:
6.0
2.60
2.60
31.5:
9.10
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.1bDelivery Truck Loading Maneuver
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]
Lock to Lock Time
Delivery Truck 7.5m
Width
Track
Steering Angle
1.00 4.16
meters
:
:
:
6.0
2.32
2.34
40.0:
7.50
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.2aPassenger Car Ramp Access
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]Note: Blue vehicles represent inbound maneuvers and red vehicles represent outbound maneuvers
Lock to Lock Time
Width
Track
:
:
:
meters
P
6.0
2.00
2.00
3.201.10
5.60
Steering Angle 35.9:
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.2bSmall Car Ramp Access
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]Note: Blue vehicles represent inbound maneuvers and red vehicles represent outbound maneuvers
Lock to Lock Time
Width
Track
:
:
:
meters
Ford Taurus (2010)
6.0
1.66
1.94
2.871.10
5.15
Steering Angle 31.3:
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.2cPassenger Car Circulation
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]Note: Blue vehicles represent inbound maneuvers and red vehicles represent outbound maneuvers
Lock to Lock Time
Width
Track
:
:
:
meters
P
6.0
2.00
2.00
3.201.10
5.60
Steering Angle 35.9:
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.2dSmall Car Ramp Access
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]Note: Blue vehicles represent inbound maneuvers and red vehicles represent outbound maneuvers
Lock to Lock Time
Width
Track
:
:
:
meters
Ford Taurus (2010)
6.0
1.66
1.94
2.871.10
5.15
Steering Angle 31.3:
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.2eSmall Car Parking Maneuver (1/2)
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]Note: Blue vehicles represent inbound maneuvers and red vehicles represent outbound maneuvers
Lock to Lock Time
Width
Track
:
:
:
meters
2015 Honda Civic
6.0
1.75
1.75
2.670.94
4.56
Steering Angle 37.5:
N
associates&u n tb
[Issued for Discussion; not for Construction]
3070 Kingsway6085-02 November 2017 Scale 1:250 on Letter Prepared by AK
Exhibit 6.2fSmall Car Parking Maneuver (2/2)
S:\PRO
JECTS\C
C\6
085-0
2 3
070 K
ingsw
ay\4
.0 A
nalysis &
Desig
n\A
CA
D\2
0171108_6
085-0
2_3
070-K
ingsw
ay_A
CA
D_V
04.d
wg
2017/1
1/0
9 1
6:0
9, P
lotted b
y Ahsa
n K
azm
i
[Based on Drawing "3070 - LEVEL 1" from GBL Architects. Received on November 06, 2017]Note: Blue vehicles represent inbound maneuvers and red vehicles represent outbound maneuvers
Lock to Lock Time
Width
Track
:
:
:
meters
Ford Taurus (2010)
6.0
1.66
1.94
2.871.10
5.15
Steering Angle 31.3:
3070 Kingsway Letter Report for Rezoning | November 10, 2017 18 S:\PROJECTS\CC\6085-02 3070 Kingsway\5.0 Deliverables\20171110_6085-02_3070_Kingsway_LTR_V01.docx
7. SUMMARY Conwest Venture Limited is planning a secure market rental building with 40 units and a small
element of ground floor commercial (3,080 sq.ft.) fronting Kingsway.
Accessibility of the site location is high, as measured by Walkscore and meets the criteria for
access to transit to achieve a reduction for the secure market rental units.
Parking access will be from the rear laneway where a single lane ramp is planned to serve one
level of parking (24 spaces).
New vehicle movements using the ramp are projected to be 13 movements in the peak-hour
periods and these can be managed with traffic signal management system described.
Vehicle parking is planned at 24 spaces, of which, 19 spaces will be allocated to residents, 3 for
visitor and 2 for commercial. The bylaw requires 3 commercials spaces but it is expected that the
residential visitor can be shared.
Class A bicycle parking is planned at 51 spaces (including one for commercial) and they can be
accessed through the front of the building at Kingsway or from a passageway at the rear laneway.
As well, 6 Class spaces will be provided and located at the entrance way to the rental units on
Kingsway.
One Class-B loading space is planned for the commercial but can be shared with the residential
(which has no specific requirement).