Date post: | 29-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jude-cattell |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Recent Developments and Outlook
Ministry of Finance
January 2011
State of IsraelMinistry of Finance
Recent Economic Developments
3
GDP GrowthQuarter-on-Quarter at Annual Rate, 2004Q1-2010Q3
3.1%
5.9%
3.2%
5.6%
4.3%
7.2%7.7%
-1.7%
6.3%5.8%
5.1%
6.7%
3.3%
0.7%
-2.7%
1.2%
3.6%
4.5%4.9%
4.4%
6.2%
4.6%
-1.6%
6.2%
8.0%
6.9%6.8%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Rapid recovery since the second half of 2009.
4
GDP GrowthAnnual Percentage Change , 1995-2012
4.0%3.8%3.6%
0.8%
4.2%
5.3%5.7%
4.9%5.1%
1.5%
-0.6%-0.1%
9.1%
3.3%4.1%
3.3%
5.6%
6.5%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
*
2011
*
2012
*
*Budget estimates.
5
1.2%
1.6%
3.7%
4.5%
4.9%4.9%
1.7%
4.1%4.4%
1.6%
2.0%
3.2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
Israel United Kingdom USA Euro Area
2010 Q1 2010 Q2 2010 Q3
GDP Growth in Israel, USA, UK and the Euro Area The 1st, 2nd, 3rd Quarters of 2010 at annual rate
Source: EuroStat, BEA, CBS.
6
The Global Economic Crises had a Moderate Impact on Israel:
A strong starting position:
Israel experienced 5 years of high GDP growth led by the private sector
Low levels of unemployment in an historical perspective and steady improvement in the participation rate in the last few years
Maintaining fiscal discipline
A continues surplus in the current account
A bubble did not develop in the real estate market
The Israeli capital market did not offer complex financial instruments
A stable banking system
A timely and targeted reaction by policy makers
7
-12.9%
-12.3%
-9.9%
-9.8%
-8.6%
-6.5%
-5.0%
-4.8%
-3.7%
0.7%
3.6%
7.0%
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10%
Japanese Yen
Australian Dollar
Thai Baht
Swiss Franc
Singpore Dollar
New Israeli Shekel
Canadian Dollar
Brazilian Real
South Korean Won
Russian Rubel
British Pound
Euro
Exchange rates US$ vs. Others Currencies, 31/12/2010 vs. 31/12/2009
8
Balance of Payments - The Current AccountUS$ Billions & As Percent of GDP, 2000-2010
-0.8%-0.8%
3.1%
5.1%
2.9%0.8%
3.9% 3.7%
2.3%
1.2%
-1.0%
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Percent of GDP
\
*2010 first 3 quarters annualized.
The current account surplus contributed to the appreciation of the shekel.
9
Exports and Imports of GoodsUS$ billions per month, excl. diamonds, ships & airplanes
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Exports
Imports
Exports recovery began in the second half of 2009, although in recent months exports of goods had slowed.
10
Composition of Industrial Exports1995-2010
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
US
$ b
illi
ons
Traditional Industries
Advanced Industries
35%
65%
23%24%
76%77%
28%
73%
25%
27%
75%73%
27%
72% 75%
25%
25%
75% 78%
22%
27%
73%78%
22%
11
Destination of ExportsExcluding diamonds, aircraft & ships, US$ billions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
European Union USA Other Countries
2008 2009 2010
Diversification of export destinations continued during the years 2009-2010
12
The Unemployment and Participation Rates
8.9% 8.7%
9.3%
10.3%10.8%
10.3%
9.0%
7.7%
6.9%6.4% 6.6%
7.6%
8.4%
7.3%
6.1%
7.3%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2009
Q3
2009
Q4
2010
Q1
2010
Q2
2010
Q3
52%
53%
54%
55%
56%
57%
58%
59%
60%
Participation rate(right axis)
Since the second half of 2009 there has been a significant decrease in the unemployment rate.
13
Real Wages 1999-2010, 2004 prices, CPI-adjusted
7,2467,340
6,794
6,783
6,997
6,8226,8236,802
7,152
6,971
6,6136,524
6,8436,947
7,4927,392
7,2687,160
7,236
7,747
7,503
7,038 7,056
7,440
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*
Public Services
Business Sector
*Jan – October average, seasonally adjusted.
In the last decade there has been very little change in real wages.
14
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
Housing Starts, Housing units per quarter (Left axis)
Fixed Investment in Residential Consruction, SA, (Right axis)
Housing Starts and Fixed Investment in Residential Construction2000-2010q3
The increase in building permits led to a rise in housing starts. This is expected to expand supply in the residential market.
Units Per Q Mil NIS
17
-1%
2.0%
3.0%
-3%
-2%
-1%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09 Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 01/11
Real interest rate
BOI interest rate
Inflationexpectations
BOI Interest Rate, Short-Term Real Interest Rate and Inflation Expectations, 2005-2010
Although the BOI rate is rising, real interest rate remains negative
18
Official Reserves (Held by the Bank of Israel)1999-2010
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Billions of US Dollars
In Months of Imports (Right Axis)
19
Market Indexes, January 2006=100, Monthly Average
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
Jan-0
6
Jul-0
6
Jan-0
7
Jul-0
7
Jan-0
8
Jul-0
8
Jan-0
9
Jul-0
9
Jan-1
0
Jul-1
0
Tel Aviv 100
Nasdaq
EEM
Source: TASE, Bloomberg
Israeli stock and corporate bonds markets exhibit positive correlation with global counterparts.
20
Risks to the Global Economic RecoverySince mid-2009 there are clear indications that the global crisis is
subsiding. But global downside risks remain a concern:
Deterioration of Global Fiscal Positions. Premature Exit from Accommodative Fiscal and Monetary
Policies. Potential of Asset Price Bubbles Abroad. Remaining Stress in the Financial Sector. Imbalances in the Global Economy. Potential for Protectionist Policy. Long Term Effects in the Labor Market.
Israel, as a small and open economy, is largely affected bydevelopments in the global economy.
Policy Issues
22
3.7%
0.6%
4.1%
3.5%
5.2%
3.5%
1.8%
1.0%
0.0%
2.1%
5.2%
2.0%
2.9%
6.0%
5.5%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
1.5%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011** 2012** 2013 2014
Est.Budget DeficitTarget
• The budget deficit in 2010 was 3.7 % GDP (compared to budget ceiling of 5.5%).
•According to two-year budget, the deficit is projected to be close to the ceiling in 2011-2012.
Central Government's Budget Deficit as Percent of GDP, 2000-2014
Source: CBS, MOF*EST.** PROJ
23
Fiscal Rule – Expenditure Side
1. Adoption of the New Fiscal Rule into the 2011-2012
Budget
– Spending growth cap calculated as follows:
– An increase in expenditure depends on a decrease in the Debt/GDP
ratio.
– When the Debt/GDP ratio declines to 60%, expenditures can be
raised by the average real GDP growth of the last 10 years.
Debt/GDP Target)Maastricht Criteria(
-----------------------Current Debt/ GDP
Average GDP growth in the last 10 years* =* 3.5%= 2.6%
60% ---------
80%
24
Fiscal Rule - Deficit Ceiling Reduction of Deficit/ GDP ratio according to a deficit ceiling law.
YearDeficit Ceiling
20105.5% Target, 3.7% Actual
20113.0%
20122.0%
20131.5%
2014 and on1.0%
The government must implement the more effective of the two rules.
25
6.2
8.8
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
9
9.5
10
10.5
Jan-07
Apr-07
Jul-07
Oct-07
Jan-08
Apr-08
Jul-08
Oct-08
Jan-09
Apr-09
Jul-09
Oct-09
Jan-10
Apr-10
Jul-10
Oct-10
Income taxesConsumption Taxes
Income and Consumption Taxes
)Billion of Nis, December 2010 prices, Seasonally adjusted(
Taxation revenue in 2010 was 195.4 BN NIS, 12.3
BN NIS higher than planned.
26
General Government Expenditure as Percent of GDP, 1995-2010
51.8%
49.2%
47.2%
49.6%50.8%
47.3%
43.6% 43.1%44.6%
52.1%
43.0%43.0%44.7%
45.3%
50.1%51.6%
50.3%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 OECDAVERAGE
2010*
* Weighted average; Source: OECD
The government cut expenditure in order to divert resources to the private sector.
27
General Government Expenditure,
as Percent of GDP, 2009
5956 56 56 54
52 52 52 52 51 51 51 50 50 49 48 4846 46 46 45 45 45 45 45 44 43 42 42 42 41
33 32 32
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Denm
ark
Sweden
France
Finlan
d
Belgiu
m Ita
ly
Austria
Nether
lands
Icela
nd
United K
ingdom
Portuga
l
Euro are
a
Gre
ece
Sloven
ia
Hungar
y
Irela
nd
Ger
man
y
Czech
Rep
ublic
Norway
Spain
Estonia
OECD A
vera
ge*
New Z
eala
nd
OECD T
otal
Poland
Canad
a
Isra
el
Luxembourg
Japan
United S
tate
s
Slovak
Rep
ublic
Switzer
land
Kor
ea
Australi
a
* Weighted average; Source: OECD
28
5755 54 53 53
51 51 50 50 49 49 48 48 4846 46
45 45 44 44 43 43 42 4241 39
37 36
3330 30
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
Denm
ark
Sweden
Finlan
d
France
Belgiu
m
Icela
nd
Austria
Italy
Nether
lands
Portu
gal
United K
ingd
om
Slove
nia
Hunga
ry
Irela
nd
Gre
ece
Ger
man
ySpai
n
Czech
Rep
ublic
Norway
New Z
eala
nd
Estonia
Poland
Canad
a
OECD A
vera
ge
Japan
Slova
k Rep
ublic
United S
tates
Isra
el
Switzer
land
Austral
ia
Kor
ea
*General government expenditure excluding military expenditure.Source: Sipri Yearbook 2010, OECD.
General Government Civil Expenditure*, Percent of GDP, 2009
29
Public and Government Debt, as percent of GDP, 1995-2010
102.2100.1 99.4
100.8
84.4
88.8
96.699.0
97.4
93.5
84.4
77.8 77.179.3
77.7
100.7
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
*
Public Debt
Government Debt
*MOF Estimate.
Strong fiscal discipline and high growth rates in 2003-2008 led to a reduction in the Debt/GDP ratio.
30
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200 20102007
Increase in Public Debt between 2007 & 2010, as Percentage of GDP
Maastricht: 60% Debt
Source: OECD, Israel 2010 - MOF estimates
The rise in the Israeli public debt is relatively moderate. The current public debt-GDP ratio is close to OECD
average.
31
Public Debt, as percent of GDP, 2010-2025
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
3.3% Growth rate
Debt GDP ratio is expected to decline
steadily to 60% around 2020.
Key Economic Policies
• Internal Growth Engines
• Insuring the Future of Advanced Sectors
• Human Capital - Maintaining the High Level of Education
• Improving Infrastructure
• Active Labor Market Policies
• Improving the Public Sector's Efficiency
• Responsible Fiscal Policy
• Bi-annual Budget
• Fiscal Rule