+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The...

Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The...

Date post: 03-Aug-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
28
Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device? Francis D. Pagani MD PhD Otto Gago MD Endowed Professor of Cardiac Surgery Michigan Medicine
Transcript
Page 1: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior

Device?

Francis D. Pagani MD PhDOtto Gago MD Endowed Professor of Cardiac Surgery

Michigan Medicine

Page 2: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

HeartMate 3 HeartMate II HVADApproved “Short Term” 2017 Approved BTT 2008 Approved BTT 2012

Approved DT 2010 Approved DT 2017

Current Device Landscape 2018

Page 3: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Recent IDE Clinical Trials in MCS

•HeartMate II Pivotal Trial for Bridge to Transplant (2008) and Destination Therapy (2010)

•ADVANCE- Pivotal Trial for HVAD for Bridge to Transplant Indication

(2012)•ENDURANCE I and ENDURANCE Supplemental Trial

- Pivotal Trial for HVAD for Destination Therapy (2017)•MOMENTUM 3

- Pivotal Trial for HeartMate 3 for Short Term and Long Term Use (2017)

Page 4: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

HeartMate II HVADversus

Page 5: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

5

Primary endpoint:

• Survival free of disabling stroke (mRS < 4 at 24 weeks post stroke) on the originally implanted device or transplanted or explanted due to myocardial recovery

ENDURANCE TRIAL

Page 6: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

ENDURANCE TRIAL Primary Endpoint Overall Survival

Page 7: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke
Page 8: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Stroke Risk Factor Multivariable Analysis (HVAD)

8

-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60

MAP (> 90 mmHg)

INR (≤ 2)

ASA (≤ 81 mg)

Odds Ratio P-value14.1 <0.0001

3.0 0.002

2.2 0.034

Statistically significantly more HVAD patients (7.3%, 0.07 EPPY) had a sub-therapeutic INR <2.0 compared to control patients (2.2%, 0.02 EPPY), P=0.004.

Page 9: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Endurance Supplemental Trial• The primary endpoint was the

incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke with an MRS >0 at 24-weeks post-stroke or any transient ischemic attack (TIA) or spinal cord infarct) at 12 months, including only time on the originally implanted LVAD.

• Strokes with MRS = 0 at 24 weeks (n=13 for HVAD, n=5 for control) were not included in the primary endpoint of neurological injury

• Intervention: BP Management for the HVAD arm

Milano et al. ISHLT April 2017versus

76%87%

70% 66% 72%79% 83%

53% 54% 54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Perc

ent o

f Sub

ject

s

B.

>100

96-100

91-95

86-90

<=85

HeartWare HVAD Control LVAD

Page 10: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Endurance Supplemental Trial

Milano et al. ISHLT April 2017versus

65

70

75

80

85

90

Baseline Discharge 3 Months 6 Months 12 Months

Aver

age

MAP

(mm

Hg)

A.

ENDURANCE HeartWare HVAD

ENDURANCE Control LVAD

ENDURANCE Supplemental HeartWare HVAD

ENDURANCE Supplemental Control LVAD

p = 0.0003

p = 0.0001 p = 0.0001 p = 0.0001

Page 11: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Endurance Supplemental Trial

Milano et al. ISHLT April 2017

Page 12: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Endurance Supplemental Trial

Milano et al. ISHLT April 2017

Adverse Event

Study DeviceN=308

Control DeviceN=157

P valuePatients with

eventn (%)

No. of eventsPatients with event n (%)

No. of events

Device Malfunction/Failure 74 (24.0%) 107 38 (24.2%) 47 >0.99

Hemolysis 4 (1.3%) 5 9 (5.7%) 9 0.01

StrokeIschemic Cerebrovascular EventHemorrhagic Cerebrovascular Event

TIA

52 (16.9%)40 (13.0%)16 (5.2%)13 (4.2%)

75581713

23 (14.6%)12 (7.6%)11 (7.0%)1 (0.6%)

2514111

0.600.090.530.04

Pump replacementExchange for pump thrombosis

16 (5.2%)14 (4.5%)

NA18 (11.5%)16 (10.2%)

NA0.020.03

Page 13: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Endurance Supplemental Trial Secondary Endpoint:(Stroke-free survival (Modified Rankin Score <4 at 24-weeks post-stroke) at two years, defined as

alive on the originally implanted device, transplanted or explanted due to patient recovery)

Milano et al. ISHLT April 2017

Page 14: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

HeartMate II HeartMate 3versus

Page 15: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

HeartMate 3 Engineering

Page 16: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

MOMENTUM 3 TRIAL•The primary end point was a composite of survival free of

disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Score < 4) or survival free of reoperation to replace or remove the device (for reasons other than recovery or transplant) at 6 months after implantation.

Page 17: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Page 18: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

HeartMate 3: US MOMENTUM TRIALShort Term Cohort: 6 Months

Primary Endpoint Overall Survival

Page 19: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke
Page 20: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Circulation. 2017;135:00–00. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028303

Page 21: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Circulation. 2017;135:00–00. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028303

Page 22: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

HeartMate 3 HVADApproved “Short Term” 2017 Approved BTT 2012

Approved DT 2017

versus

Page 23: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Important Challenges

• Stroke-Technology goal < 5%

• Device-related infection• Device thrombosis

Page 24: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Summary• 2017 was a progressive year for durable VAD therapy

-Optimism stemming from continued improvements in technology

-The importance of new technology significantly reducing pump thrombosis can not be understated

-Important understanding of how management practices can influence outcomes (i.e., BP control)

• Centrifugal pumps will dominate clinical use• Continued dissemination/diffusion of the therapy• Stroke and device-related infections remain important

barriers into the less ill population

Page 25: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke
Page 26: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke
Page 27: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Role: SpeakerDate: Thursday, March 8, 2108Session: Plenary Session: Hot Topics in Mechanical Circulatory Support for Heart and LungTitle: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?Time: 8:10 a.m. - 8:30 a.m.

Page 28: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?...Endurance Supplemental Trial • The primary endpoint was the incidence of neurologic injury (defined as any stroke

Dear Dr. Pagani,

We look forward to your participation in the AATS Mechanical Circulatory Support Symposium: 21st Century State of the Art Treatment of Heart and Lung Failure, taking place March 8 - 9, 2018 at the Marriott Marquis Houston in Houston, Texas.

Attached is a copy of the program agenda listing your presentation(s) date(s), time(s) and title(s). Your role for each is listed below.

Role: SpeakerDate: Thursday, March 8, 2108Session: Plenary Session: Hot Topics in Mechanical Circualtory Support for Heart and LungTitle: Recent Trials With Durable LVADs: Is There a Superior Device?Time: 8:10 a.m. - 8:30 a.m.

Role: ModeratorDate: Thursday, March 8, 2108Session: Concurrent Session IIIa: Patient Selection and Optimization for Durable MCS DevicesTime: 1:30 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.

Role: ModeratorDate: Friday, March 9, 2018Session: Concurrent Session VIIa: Debates on Controversial SubjectsTime: 9:45 a.m. - 10:45 a.m.

As you prepare your presentation slides, please keep in mind the following:•All Relevant Financial Relationships must be disclosed to learners prior to the start of the live activity. A Disclosure Statement slide must be included as the second slide for all presentations.•AATS will be using 16:9 Wide Screens. Instructions for formatting slides wide screen are attached.•You will NOT have access to “speaker notes” view in your session room – please bring a hardcopy of your notes, if needed.•Laptops are NOT allowed to be connected to the podium monitor- please bring a copy of your presentation on a USB drive.

Presentation Check In:


Recommended