+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Reducer Weldoverlay

Reducer Weldoverlay

Date post: 13-Sep-2015
Category:
Upload: gsk5513
View: 243 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
To weld build up over the reducer ID for proper matching with the connecting CRA Cladded pipe.
Popular Tags:
4
AIM: To weld build up over the reducer ID for proper matching with the connecting CRA Cladded pipe. Need of weld buildup: ID mismatch was observed during fit up stage of reducer and CRA Cladded pipe. The root cause of the problem was identified that the reducers were procured according the thickness of pipe without considering the Cladded thickness. To solve this problem suggestion was made by L&T to put weld overlay over the ID of the reducers and the methodology was approved by COMPANY. Methodology adopted: It was proposed to test a mock up piece according to the Approved Method Statement. The COMPANY Approved method statement for weld overlay is attached along with. Execution stage of work: The various steps followed for the work execution are:- 1. A surplus eccentric reducer (IMIR No. 93/5) was identified for the actual execution of the test. 2. COMPANY approved WPS was identified according to the requirements of the job. 3. COMPANY approved welder (qualified into the required welding process i.e. GTAW) was identified and d about the job to be done. 4. Marking was done before actual start and witnessed by GL & ADMA. Marking on the reducer. 5. First run was overlaid and shown to GL & COMPANY. First run overlaid.
Transcript
  • AIM: To weld build up over the reducer ID for proper matching with the connecting

    CRA Cladded pipe.

    Need of weld buildup: ID mismatch was observed during fit up stage of reducer

    and CRA Cladded pipe. The root cause of the problem was identified that the

    reducers were procured according the thickness of pipe without considering the

    Cladded thickness. To solve this problem suggestion was made by L&T to put weld

    overlay over the ID of the reducers and the methodology was approved by

    COMPANY.

    Methodology adopted: It was proposed to test a mock up piece according to the

    Approved Method Statement. The COMPANY Approved method statement for weld

    overlay is attached along with.

    Execution stage of work: The various steps followed for the work execution are:-

    1. A surplus eccentric reducer (IMIR No. 93/5) was identified for the actual

    execution of the test.

    2. COMPANY approved WPS was identified according to the requirements of the

    job.

    3. COMPANY approved welder (qualified into the required welding process i.e.

    GTAW) was identified and d about the job to be done.

    4. Marking was done before actual start and witnessed by GL & ADMA.

    Marking on the reducer.

    5. First run was overlaid and shown to GL & COMPANY.

    First run overlaid.

  • 6. In the same manner with subsequent runs one layer was completed and

    witnessed by GL & ADMA.

    First layer Completed

    7. On completion of first layer DP test was carried out in presence of GL & ADMA.

    Result of DP was found OK. Report attached

    DP testing being carried out

    8. After DP and Cleaning Second layer was overlaid in the same manner and DP

    was carried out. Result of the testing was found OK. Report attached

  • Second layer completed & DP being carried out.

    9. Then the test piece was offered for RT. RT film was witnessed by GL and found

    OK. See report attached.

    RT marking shown on the test piece.

    10. After successful completion of RT the test piece was sent for machining.

    Machining of the reducer was a great hurdle for which Mr. J K Das (Machine

    shop foremen) found out a solution and a casing was made as shown in figure.

    Reducer & the casing made for machining

    In this casing any type of reducer (Concentric/Eccentric) can be easily fixed and

    machined which reduces the job set up time as well. SS bolts were used and

    packing of SS sheets was used for tightening the reducer into the casing.

  • 11. Machining was done by putting the reducer into the casing.

    Reducer fitted into casing Machining in progress

    12. After machining all the length, thickness, ID, OD was checked and found

    within the limits.

    13. Final product after machining is as shown under.

    14. After final machining a trial fit up was shown to COMPANY and found OK.


Recommended