Region IV-A CALABARZON - depedimuscity.com · Region IV-A CALABARZON SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF...

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education

Region IV-A CALABARZON

SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF IMUS CITY

Toclong I-C, City of Imus

046-471-1134 | 046-471-0568 www.depedimuscity.com [email protected] | [email protected]

Enclosure No. 1 to DM ______s. 2019

EXECUTIVE COMMITEE

DR. HERMOGENES M. PANGANIBAN

Over-All Chairman

MR. GALILEO L. GO

Co-Chairman

DR. GLENDA DS. CATADMAN

CID-Focal Person

MR. GREGORIO A. CO JR.

SGOD-Focal Person

Members

EVALUATION AND SELECTION COMMITTEES

Individual Category

Chairman: Mr. Galileo L. Go

Co-Chairman: Ms. Shirley F. Ferrera

Journalism, SPA and Reading Program

Chairman: Dr. Glenda DS. Catadman

Co-Chairman: Dr. Leticia A. Rogacion

ELLNA Implementer Chairman: Ms. Adora G. del Mundo

Co-Chairman: Dr. Josephine P. Canlas

GAD Program Implementer

Chairman: Ms. Jenielyn A. Sadang

Co-Chairman: Dr. Marilou P. Bronzi

SBFP Implementer

Chairman: Dr. Rolando B. Talon Jr.

Co-Chairman: Dr. Leah J. Guillang

Best Performing Public Elementary, JHS and SHS

Chairman: Mr. Gregorio A. Co Jr.

Co-Chairman: Ms. Riza C. Garcia

DRRMM Implementer

Chairman: Mr. Josephus Perseus B. Banaag

Co-Chairman: Mr. Christian Gabrielle C. Ynieto

Research

Chairman: Mr. Galileo L. Go

Co-Chairman: Ms. Matea Alvyn H. Trinidad

SBM and Eco-Friendly School Implementer

Chairman: Mr. Christian Mespher A. Hernandez

Co-Chairman: Mr. Ronnie B. Yohan

Members for the

Individual Category

Ms. Feliz A. Tayao

Mr. Ivan Honorpette A. Mijares

Ms. Rebecca M. Monzon

Mr. John Enoch Dayrit

Members for the School

Category

Dr. Rolando B. Talon Jr.

Dr. Marciano V. Valles

Dr. Marilou P. Bronzi

Ariel L. Dayrit








GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DOCUMENTS

I. Scope of the Program

The GAWAD IMUSENYO Parangal is a division program on rewards and

recognition anchored on the Civil Service Commission’s Program on Awards and

Incentives for Service Excellence (PRAISE) and DepEd Order No. 9, s. 2002 re:

Establishing PRAISE in the Department of Education.

The activity aims to recognize the exemplary performance of instructional leaders,

teachers, non-teaching personnel and employees for their contribution, dedication and

commitment; distinguish those who achieved length of service milestone in their respective

task and; promote and encourage creativity, innovativeness, efficiency, integrity, positive

behavior, commitment, loyalty productivity and quality of work.

The program applies to all Schools Division Office of Imus City employees that

include the teaching and non-teaching personnel holding permanent positions, as well as

the schools that bagged numerous awards, recognition and brought honor to the SDO. Also,

this program includes those whose nature of employment fall either under job order or

contract of services and under local school board (LSB).

II. Categories of Award

Individual Category:

Outstanding Teacher (Elementary, JHS and SHS)

Outstanding Kindergarten or SPED Teacher

Outstanding School Head (Elementary, JHS and SHS)

Outstanding Education Program Supervisor

Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel (Level 1- SG 1-9)

Outstanding Non-Teaching Personnel (Level 2– SG 10-22, except EPS)

Outstanding Utility, Clerk, Driver or CSU (LSB, casual and job order)

Outstanding Researcher (Elementary, JHS and SHS)

Outstanding School Paper Adviser (SPA) (Elementary, JHS and SHS)

School Category:

Outstanding Campus Journalism Program Implementer (Elementary and Secondary)

Outstanding School DRRM Implementer (Elementary and Secondary)

Most Effective Reading Program Implementer (Elementary and Secondary)

Most Effective School ELLNA Implementer

Best School-Based Management (SBM) Implementer

Outstanding School GAD Program Implementer

Best Performing Public Elementary School

Best Performing Public Junior High School

Best Performing Public Stand Alone Senior High School

Most Effective Eco-Friendly School Implementer

Most Effective SBFP Implementer







III. Eligibility Requirements of Nominees (Adopted from CALABARZON GAWAD

PATNUGOT)

Nominated schools, instructional leaders, teaching and non-teaching personnel in the

individual and school categories will be evaluated based on their outstanding

accomplishments and must meet the following qualifications:

Individual Category

1. Filipino Citizen

2. Certification signed by the Administrative Officer IV/V (Personnel) that the

nominee has obtained at least Very Satisfactory (VS) performance ratings for the

last two (2) years

3. Copy of the rating forms should be attached to the nomination folder

4. Active in the service for not less than five (5) years and must not be on leave at the

time of the Search

5. Has not been subjected to any form of disciplinary actions

6. No pending administrative, criminal and civil case filed

7. No notice of Disallowance from COA

School Category

1. Certification from the Administrative Officer IV/V (Personnel of SDO) that the

school nominee has obtained at least Very Satisfactory (VS) performance ratings

for the last two (2) years (OPCRF)

2. Certification of No Unliquidated Cash Advances and Disallowances for previous

accountabilities as of December 31 of the year prior to nomination to be secured by the HRMO from the Commission on Audit (COA), Resident Auditor. Said

Certification should be signed by the agency’s COA Resident Auditor NOT the

agency’s Financial Officer/Accountant.

3. In case of existing unliquidated cash advance and disallowance, a certificate of the

status of such financial obligation shall be issued by the COA Resident Auditor.

IV. Disqualification

1. Previous awardees of SDO’s PRAISE

2. Awardee of National Search

3. Persons who have been suspended, reprimanded or with pending cases relative to

violation of any administrative policies, rules and regulations

4. Less than 80% rating of the submitted documents

V. Criteria for Evaluation

A. Individual Category

CRITERIA POINTS

1. Performance Rating (IPCRF/OPCRF) 30

2. Significant Accomplishment/s

Project/Work Accomplished, number of strategies/activities done

that have significantly impacted the performance of the school,

number of accomplished work/projects that benefited the

community. The role of TEA Governance must be highlighted.

15







3. Impact of Accomplishments

Scope/replicability of the program/project/activity, number of

people/office benefited and transactions facilitated, level of

attainment per identified Performance Indicator

25

4. Innovation

Original, creative programs, projects, activities made in the last

three (3) years in connection to the award category and the extent

to which it/they s/are being used and the results: number of persons

who benefited; scope/replicability of the innovation, level of

attainment per identified Performance Indicator. The role of TEA

Governance must be highlighted.

20

5. Awards and Membership

Major awards/citations received relevant to the category and active

membership in a reputable professional organization

10

B. School Category

CRITERIA POINTS

1. Performance Rating (OPCRF) 30

2. Significant Accomplishment/s

Project/Work Accomplished, number of strategies/activities done

that have significantly impacted the performance of the school and

the organization as well.

15

3. Impact of Accomplishments

Scope/replicability of the program/project/activity, number of

people/office benefited and transactions facilitated, level of

attainment per identified Performance Indicator

25

4. Innovation

Original, creative programs, projects, activities made in the last

two (2) years in connection to the award category and the extent to

which it/they s/are being used and the results: number of persons

who benefited; scope/replicability of the innovation, level of

attainment per identified Performance Indicator.

20

5. Awards and Membership

Major awards/citations received in connection to the award

10

VI. Required Nomination Documents

Each nomination requires the submission of one (1) nomination folder containing the

fully accomplished GAWAD IMUSENYO Parangal nomination form and other

documentary requirements.

A. Completely Filled Out GAWAD IMUSENYO Parangal Nomination Form (Maximum

of 10 pages including Executive Summary and Nomination Write-Up).

GAWAD IMUSENYO Parangal (GI) Nomination Form 1 – Nomination for the

individual category

GAWAD IMUSENYO Parangal (GI) Nomination Form 2 – Nomination Form for

the school category







B. Nominee’s updated Form 212 or Personal Data Sheet with passport size photo with

name tag taken during the last six months prior to the nomination (For Individual

Category).

C. Certification from the chairperson of the school PRAISE Committee or its equivalent,

that the nomination has undergone deliberation by the Committee.

D. Letter from the head of office endorsing the nomination to the Division’s PRAISE

Committee

E. Self-certification of No Pending Administrative, Civil and Criminal Case (Individual

Category)

F. Certification signed by the Administrative Officer IV/V (Personnel) that the nominee

has obtained at least Very Satisfactory (VS) performance ratings (IPCRF) for the last

two (2) years for the individual category and Very Satisfactory (VS) performance rating

(OPCRF) for the last two (2) years for the school. Copy of the rating forms should be

attached to the nomination folder.

G. Copy of the recent appointment (Individual Category)

H. Authenticated and updated PRC License (Individual Category)

I. Certification of No Unliquidated Cash Advances and Disallowances for previous

accountabilities as of December 31 of the year prior to nomination to be secured by the

HRMO from the Commission on Audit (COA), Resident Auditor. Said Certification

should be signed by the agency’s COA Resident Auditor NOT the agency’s Financial

Officer/Accountant. (For Principal, EPS, and School Categories).

J. In case of existing unliquidated cash advance and disallowance, a certificate of the

status of such financial obligation shall be issued by the COA Resident Auditor.

Each completely filled up nomination form should be accompanied by a write-up using

the Nomination Write –Up form. In no case shall the write-up exceed the maximum

allowable ten (10) pages of A4 bond paper, using Times New Roman font size 11.

The nomination form and documentary requirements should be placed in legal size

folders. Hard-bound and creative covers are discouraged. Copies of annual reports,

recommendations from institutions/personalities, news clippings and certificates of

training, seminars and recognition should not be included in the nomination folder.

Only required documents must be submitted.

VII. Write-Up of Accomplishments

A. The write-up must highlight outstanding accomplishments or exemplary norms of

conduct manifested within the last two (2) years. Presentation of accomplishments or

norms manifested should be in order of significance, complete with descriptions,

justifications and should adhere to the following pointers:

Use specific terms. Define/clarify terms such as “assisted”, “contributed” or

“facilitated”;

State outstanding accomplishments of exemplary norms displayed and impact in

brief, factual and in bullet form;







Present impact accomplishments by indicating problems addressed, people/office

benefited and/or transactions facilitated.

B. The following information must be adequately provided:

For outstanding work accomplishment, state whether or not the accomplishments

presented are part of the regular duties of the nominee or if these are his/her own

initiative. If part of nominee’s regular duties or mandate, cite justifications on why

the accomplishments are considered exceptional or extra ordinary.

C. Limitation on Nomination

The nomination write-up should only be for a maximum of 10 pages (A4 size bond

paper, Times new Roman # 11 font) to include the summary of accomplishments,

impact and other information.

An employee or official should be nominated to only one award category.

GAWAD IMUSENYO Parangal awardees can still be nominated to the same or to

a different award category after three years from the conferment of his/her award

provided that the nomination is based on a new set of accomplishments and/or

exemplary norms/behavior manifested.

VIII. Criteria for Evaluation for Outstanding Utility, Clerk, Driver, and CSU (national,

casual, job order, LSB) (Excerpt from Schools Division Office Employee of the Month

Program and Gawad Patnugot)

Qualification:

To qualify for the award, the nominee must be:

1. Filipino Citizen

2. Has obtained at least Very Satisfactory (VS) performance ratings for the last two

(2) years

3. Active in the service for not less than three (3) years and must not be on leave at the

time of the Search

4. Has not been subjected to any form of disciplinary actions

5. No pending administrative, criminal and civil case filed

6. No notice of Disallowance from COA

Selection Criteria:

Nominees will be judged on a point system. Each criteria standard has a point value

indicated. The nominee who shall obtain the highest points receives the award.

1. Attitude and Commitment (25%)

- Dedicated to fulfilling job responsibilities

- Demonstrates good customer service skills

- Consistently dependable and is punctual in reporting to work

- Active involvement in committees, fund-raisings, fairs, trainings, and other

miscellaneous activities

- Serves as a role model to others

- Goes above and beyond the requirements of the job

2. Interpersonal Skills (25%)







- Displays a helpful, cooperative and positive attitude towards superiors and

co-workers

- Consistently friendly and available to others

- Uses effective listening skills

- Has a team player attitude

- Voluntarily assists co-workers in order to complete important department

projects

3. Work Performance (25%)

- Knowledgeable of DepEd policy and procedure

- High overall quality of performance

- Accurately completes work assignments on time

- Controls high stress situations tactfully and calmly

- Takes initiative

- Requires little supervision

- Willingness to learn and take on new responsibilities

- Ability to train others and gladly willing to do so

4. Personal Traits (25%)

- Maintains an appropriate and neat personal appearance and dress

- Professional demeanor

- Conscientious, honest, hard-working

- Integrity, on and off the job

Total = 100%

IX. Procedures/Mechanics

1. The OIC-ASDS shall organize the selection committee for each category.

2. Demonstration teaching and validation of documents shall be announced in a

specific time.

3. Only those who can meet all the required documents shall proceed to the interview

at the venue to be announced through a division memorandum.

4. The official list of Outstanding Teaching and Non-Teaching Personnel and those

Outstanding Schools will be posted in the division website through a memorandum

after the final evaluation and selection of the Search.

X. Awards

Plaque

Certificate of Recognition

XI. Grounds for Disqualification of Nomination

A. Non-compliance with the submission of complete documentary requirements shall

render the nominee ineligible for the Search (deadline, size and number of folders,

accuracy and completeness of information required in the nomination form,

maximum number of pages for the accomplishment write-up, clearances and other







required documents). Nominations with incomplete documents shall no longer be

processed.

B. Any misrepresentation made in any of the documents submitted shall be a ground

for disqualification and for disciplinary action against the certifying

nominee/authority pursuant to applicable CSC laws and rules.








Form 1: Nomination Form (Individual Category)

Nomination: Ex. OUTSTANDING NON-TEACHING PERSONNEL

(Level 2)

Name of Nominee: _____________________________

Position Title: _____________________________

Division: SCHOOLS DIVISION OF IMUS CITY

Official Station/School: __________________________

Address (Official Station/School): ______________________

Telephone No./Fax Number (Official Station/School): ___________________

E-mail Address (Official Station/School): _____________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(To be filled -out by immediate superior)

I hereby nominate

__________________________________________________________________________

(name)

of _______________________________________________________________________

(position title) (Official station/school)

for the _________________________________ of the 2019 Schools Division of Imus

(nomination)

City GAWAD IMUSENYO PARANGAL.

Other Information:

Were you a previous GAWAD IMUSENYO PARANGAL (formerly GAWAD SAGISAG)

nominee? Yes ___ No ___ If yes, what year? _____ What award category? ____________

Were you a previous GAWAD IMUSENYO PARANGAL (formerly GAWAD SAGISAG)

winner? Yes ___ No ____ If yes, what year? _____ What award category? _____________

Nominated by:

___________________________

(immediate superior)

“2 x 2” PICTURE








Form 2: Nomination Form (School Category)

Nomination:

_______________________________________________________________________

Name of School:

_______________________________________________________________________

Division:

_______________________________________________________________________

Address (Official Station/School):

_______________________________________________________________________

Telephone No./Fax Number (Official Station/School):

_______________________________________________________________________

E-mail Address (Official Station/School):

_______________________________________________________________________

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(To be filled -out by immediate superior)

I hereby endorse

___________________________________________________________________________

(name of school)

for the _________________________________ of the 2019 Schools Division of Imus City

(nomination)

GAWAD IMUSENYO PARANGAL.

Other Information:

Was your school a previous GAWAD IMUSENYO PARANGAL (formerly GAWAD

SAGISAG) nominee? Yes___ No ___, If yes, what year? _________ What award category?

_______________________

Was your school a previous GAWAD IMUSENYO PARANGAL (formerly GAWAD

SAGISAG) winner? Yes ___ No ____, If yes, what year? _____ What award category? ___________________

_______________________________

Name of principal

Signature over printed name








NOMINATION WRITE-UP

FOR INDIVIDUAL CATEGORY

(Adopted from CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOT)

Name of Nominee: ______________________________________________

School: ________________________________________________________

Position/Designation: _____________________________________________

Length of Service in the Position: ___________________________________

Length of Service in the Government: ________________________________

I. Executive Summary. Description of why the nominee is deserving of the award in

not more than 150 words which includes personal and professional traits and

competencies.

II. Significant Accomplishment/s within the last three years (January 2016-

January 2019). Description of the project/work accomplished strategies/activities

done that have significantly impact on the performance of the school/school

community.

III. Impact of the Accomplishments. Indicate the problems addressed, people/office

benefited and transactions facilitated whether or not the accomplishments are part

of the nominee’s regular functions/ mandated or the product of his/her initiative. If

parts of the nominee’s regular duties or mandated. Justify why the accomplishments

are considered exemplary or extraordinary.

IV. Innovations. If any, original, creative programs, projects, activities made in the last

three (3) years in connection to the award category.

V. Awards and Membership. List or mention major awards/citations received

relevant to the category and active membership in a reputable professional

organization. No need to attach photocopies of certificates.








NOMINATION WRITE-UP

FOR SCHOOL CATEGORY

(Adopted from CALABARZON GAWAD PATNUGOT)

Name of School: ______________________________________________

Category: ____________________________________________________

I. Executive Summary. Description of why the school is deserving of the award in

not more than 150 words which includes TEA Governance implementation.

Financial management, DepEd programs and projects implementation.

II. Significant Accomplishment/s within the last two years (January 2017-

January 2019. Description of the project/work accomplished, strategies/activities

done that have significantly impact on the performance of the learners and the

school as well.

III. Impact of the Accomplishments. Indicate problems addressed, people/office

benefited and transactions facilitated. Justify why the accomplishments are

considered exemplary or extraordinary.

IV. Innovations. If any, original, creative programs, projects, activities made in the last

two (20 years in connection to the award category.

V. Other Information. List or mention major wards/citations received by the school

in connection to the award. No need to attach photocopies of certificates.

Date post:	28-Oct-2019
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	22 times
Download:	0 times