+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Date post: 21-Oct-2016
Category:
Upload: peter-johnson
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
7
Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS December 15, 1982 Pages 769-775 REGULATION OF MUSCLE PHOSPHORYLASE ACTIVITY BY CARNOSINE AND ANSERINE Peter Johnson*, Joanne S. Fedyna*,tAndrew Schindzielorz Cindylu Montz Smith* and tPeter J. Kasvinsky *Department of Chemistry and College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University Athens, OH 45701, and tDepartment of Biochemistry, Marshall University Medical School, Huntington, WV 25704 Received October 22, 1982 SUMMARY. Carnosine (B-alanyl-L-histidine) activates rabbit muscle phosphorylase 5 inpresence and absence of AMP and phosphorylase b in the presence of AMP in a biphasic manner with a maximal activation at about 50mM carnosine and with phos- phorylase b showing a greater degree of activation than phosphorylase a. Anserine (B-alanyl-L-NT-methyl-histidine) activates phosphorylase a to a lesser extent than carnosine up to a concentration of 90mM, whereas with phosphorylase b a weak acti- vation below 30mM and a concentration-dependent inhibition above thiS concentration occurs. These effects are specific for the dipeptides and are not shown by their constituent amino acids. Carnosine and anserine activate phosphorylase 2 in the presence of the allosteric inhibitors ATP, D-glucose and caffeine, and the inhibi- tion of phosphorylase b by anserine is also observed in the presence of these inhibitors. Carnosine (B-alanyl-L-histidine) and anserine (8-alanyl-L-N*-methyl-histidine) are found in a wide variety of vertebrate muscles at concentrations approaching 40 millimolar in some cases (1). The dipeptides are generally found at higher con- centrations in anaerobic (fast twitch) muscles whereas highly aerobic muscles (such as cardiac muscle) have little or no detectable amounts of these compounds (2). The ratio of carnosine to anserine varies widely between different muscles and it has also been reported (3,4) that this ratio and the absolute levels of the dipeptides are not constant in a given muscle but vary with development, exercise and denervation. In addition to its presence in muscle, carnosine is also found in other excitable tissues (5,6), and considerable interest has centered on the high and variable amounts of the dipeptide in olfactory epithelium and bulb (7). Despite the relatively widespread distributions of these dipeptides, their precise physiological role(s) are not clearly established although several have 0006-291X/82/230769-07$01.00/0 769 Copyright 0 1982 by Academic Press, Inc. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.
Transcript
Page 1: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS December 15, 1982 Pages 769-775

REGULATION OF MUSCLE PHOSPHORYLASE ACTIVITY BY CARNOSINE AND ANSERINE

Peter Johnson*, Joanne S. Fedyna*,tAndrew Schindzielorz Cindylu Montz Smith* and tPeter J. Kasvinsky

*Department of Chemistry and College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University Athens, OH 45701, and tDepartment of Biochemistry, Marshall University Medical

School, Huntington, WV 25704

Received October 22, 1982

SUMMARY. Carnosine (B-alanyl-L-histidine) activates rabbit muscle phosphorylase 5 inpresence and absence of AMP and phosphorylase b in the presence of AMP in a biphasic manner with a maximal activation at about 50mM carnosine and with phos- phorylase b showing a greater degree of activation than phosphorylase a. Anserine (B-alanyl-L-NT-methyl-histidine) activates phosphorylase a to a lesser extent than carnosine up to a concentration of 90mM, whereas with phosphorylase b a weak acti- vation below 30mM and a concentration-dependent inhibition above thiS concentration occurs. These effects are specific for the dipeptides and are not shown by their constituent amino acids. Carnosine and anserine activate phosphorylase 2 in the presence of the allosteric inhibitors ATP, D-glucose and caffeine, and the inhibi- tion of phosphorylase b by anserine is also observed in the presence of these inhibitors.

Carnosine (B-alanyl-L-histidine) and anserine (8-alanyl-L-N*-methyl-histidine)

are found in a wide variety of vertebrate muscles at concentrations approaching 40

millimolar in some cases (1). The dipeptides are generally found at higher con-

centrations in anaerobic (fast twitch) muscles whereas highly aerobic muscles

(such as cardiac muscle) have little or no detectable amounts of these compounds

(2). The ratio of carnosine to anserine varies widely between different muscles

and it has also been reported (3,4) that this ratio and the absolute levels of

the dipeptides are not constant in a given muscle but vary with development,

exercise and denervation. In addition to its presence in muscle, carnosine is

also found in other excitable tissues (5,6), and considerable interest has centered

on the high and variable amounts of the dipeptide in olfactory epithelium and

bulb (7).

Despite the relatively widespread distributions of these dipeptides, their

precise physiological role(s) are not clearly established although several have

0006-291X/82/230769-07$01.00/0

769 Copyright 0 1982 by Academic Press, Inc.

All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Page 2: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

been suggested for carnosine in particular including buffering power (2), myosin

regulation (8,9), divalent ion chelation (lO,ll), neurotransmission (12), and

histamine biosynthesis (13). In this report, we present evidence that the

dipeptides might be involved in the in vivo regulation of muscle phosphorylase --

as both of the dipeptides activate both a and k forms of the enzyme at physio- -

logical dipeptide concentrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Carnosine, anserine nitrate, NADP+ (N-0505), glycogen (Type III), phospho- glucomutase (P-3397), glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Type XV), and rabbit muscle phosphorylase a (P-1261) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., Missouri. Before use, the glycogen was further purified by chromatography on BioRad AG 1x8 (200-400 mesh) resin (14), Rabbit muscle phosphorylase b was prepared by the procedure of Fischer and Krebs (15) and after four recryFtallisations, the protein was chromatographed on a Sephadex G-25 column to remove contaminating AMP (16),

Assays of the phosphorolytic activity of phosphorylase were performed at 30°C according to the general procedure of Helmreich and Cori (17) as described in (18) using a Gilford model 250 spectrophotometer equipped with a Thermoset temperature control and a model 6051 recorder. A final volume of 0.5ml per assay was used in which the initial concentrations of glycogen and phosphate were 0.5% (w/v) and 1OmM respectively, and the amount of enzyme used was approximately 0.1 ug per assay. Assays of the glycogenic activity of phos- phorylase were performed according to the procedure of Engers et al (19) as described in (14) using 2mM glucose l-phosphate. Specific activities were calculated based on protein concentrations for phosphorylase determined spec- trophotometrically from El% at 280 nm = 13.2 (14). The respective specific activities for the phosphd#lytic activity of phosphorylase a and phosphorylase bwhen assayed under these conditions in the presence of 0.5iM AMP were found to be 22.6 umol/min/mg enzyme and 10.1 umol/min/mg enzyme.

RESULTS

When phosphorylase a and b activities were measured in the presence of -

0.5mM AMP and in the presence of varying amounts of carnosine, it was found

that the dipeptide had an activating effect which was maximal at about 20-40mM

carnosine (Fig. 1A) for both enzymes. In these experiments it was found that

phosphorylase b was considerably more sensitive to activation by carnosine

than was phosphorylase a.

Because of the inhibitory effect of nitrate ion on phosphorylase (20), the

effects of anserine (as the nitrate salt) were studied using a series of controls

containing appropriate concentrations of nitrate ion. These results (Fig. 1B)

showed that anserine was a more effective activator of phosphorylase awhen compared

770

Page 3: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

20 40 60 80

[CAI~N~~INE] .mM

20 40 60 80

[ANSERINE] ,mM

Fiq. 1. Effects of Carnosine and Anserine on Phosphorylase a and b Activities. Assays of phosphorolytic and glycogenic activities of the enzymes were made in the presence of 0.5mM AMP and variable amounts of carnosine or anserine as described in Methods. The results are expressed as a percentage of the control activity recorded for the enzyme in the absence of dipeptide. Studies with anserine were performed using controls containing appropriate nitrate concen- trations. A, variable carnosine; B, variable anserine. Phosphorolytic activity of a, M ; glycogenic activity of a-,&+ ; phosphorolytic activity of b M; glycogenic activity of b, M.

to phosphorylase b, and with the latter enzyme, the dipeptide was inhibitory at

higher concentrations.

Control experiments revealed that these results were not caused by effects

of the dipeptides on the auxiliary enzymes (phosphoglucomutase and glucose

6-phosphate dehydrogenase) used in the phosphorolysis assay, and the dipeptide

effects were also observed when the glycogenic activity of the enzymes was

assayed.

The effects of carnosine and anserine were shown to be different from

those of their constituent amino acids (Table I). These results showed that

B-alanine has little effect on phosphorylase activities, whereas L-histidine

is inhibitory and L-N'-methyl-histidine is activating. When equimolar concen-

trations of B-alanine and either of the other amino acids were used, the effect

on phosphorylase activity was different from that of the same concentration of

the corresponding dipeptide, indicating that peptide bond formation is a

prerequisite for the dipeptide effect.

As phosphorylase is known to contain at least three allosteric sites (21),

studies were also performed on the effect of the dipeptides in the presence of

771

Page 4: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNlCATlONS

TABLE I

Effect of Free Amino Acids on Phosphorylase Activity

Amino acid Relative Activity (%)b in assaya

Phosphorylase a Phosphorylase b

@alanine 95 110

L-histidine 58 9

L-NT-methyl-histidine 120 129

B-alanine + L-histidine 55 21

B-alanine + L-NV-methyl-histidine 105 76

aPresent at 25mM concentration. b

Results expressed relative to the phosphorolytic activities of control samples of phosphorylases assayed in the presence of 0.5mM AMP and the absence of free amino acids.

known effecters in order to investigate if the dipeptides are bound at any of

the effecters sites (see Table II). In studies on the effect of the presence of

AMP on the activation effect of carnosine, it was found that carnosine activated

phosphorylase a regardless of the presence of AMP, whereas no phosphorylase b

activity was detectable in the presence of carnosine and the absence of AMP.

In the presence of AMP, carnosine was found to activate both forms of phosphory-

lase in the presence of the allosteric inhibitors D-glucose, ATP and caffeine,

and the activating effect of anserine on phosphorylase a in the presence of AMP

was also evident in the presence of these inhibitors. At an inhibitory anserine

concentration (50mM) and in the presence of the allosteric inhibitors (Table II),

the inhibitory effect of anserine was still evident, but because almost complete

inhibition of the enzyme occurred in these cases, it was not possible to make

conclusions about possible interactive effects of anserine and the other inhibitors.

DISCUSSION

These studies clearly demonstrate that carnosine is a non-essential

activator (22) of both phosphorylase 5 and b. As carnosine activates phosphory-

lase 5 in the presence or absence of the activator AMP but cannot activate

phosphorylase b in its absence, it appears that carnosine does not bind at the

772

Page 5: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

TABLE II

Effects of Carnosine and Anserine on Phosphorylase Activity

in the Presence of AMP, ATP, D-glucose and Caffeine

Effecters in Assaya

Relative Activity (%)b

Phosphorylase a Phosphorylase b

None 93 0

AMP 100 100

Carnosine 120 0

Anserine 115 0

AMP + ATP 72 5

AMP + D-Glucose 76 20

AMP + Caffeine 60 2

AMP + Carnosine + ATP 117 25

AMP t Carnosine + D-Glucose a4 24

AMP t Carnosine + Caffeine a2 a

AMP + Anserine + ATP 80 2

AMP + Anserine + D-Glucose a9 5

AMP + Anserine t Caffeine 73 2

aConcentrations used in the assays were: AMP, 0.5mM; carnosine, 25mM; ATP, 9mY; D-glucose, 25mM; caffeine, 2mM; anserine, 25mM in studies with phosphorylase 5 and 50mM with phosphorylase k.

b Results are expressed relative to the phosphorolytic activities of phosphorylase a and b in the presence of 0.5mM AMP and the absence of any of the other effecters.

nucleotide-binding site of the enzyme in competition with AMP (22). That the

activation curves for both enzymes show a biphasic character also suggests

that there may be at least two binding sites for carnosine on phosphorylase.

Anserine can also activate phosphorylase a in a biphasic concentration-

dependent manner although the extent of activation is less than that obtained

with carnosine. However, in contrast to carnosine, anserine significantly

inhibits phosphorylase b at higher dipeptide concentrations (depending on the -

773

Page 6: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

direction of the assay), and the biphasic response of phosphorylase b activity

to increasing anserine concentration suggests that there may be more than one

type of binding site for anserine on the enzyme. The difference in the responses

of phosphorylase a and b to anserine also suggests that the binding event which

causes inhibition in phosphorylase b either does not occur or is not inhibitory

in phosphorylase a.

Because of the similarities in dipeptide structures and effects on phos-

phorylase, it is tempting to speculate that carnosine and anserine may bind

at the same site(s) on phosphorylase, with differences in binding and effects

on activity being related to the presence of the NT-methyl group in anserine.

In these preliminary studies, carnosine appears to be a more effective activator

of phosphorylase bthan a, and methylation of carnosine to anserine appears to

favor inhibition of phosphorylase band activation of phosphorylase a,

The Possibility of physiological control of phosphorylase by the dipeptides

is suggested by the fact that activation effects are demonstrable at physiological

concentration of the dipeptides and that the response of phosphorylase a to each

dipeptide is quite different from that of phosphorylase b0 Furthermore, the

regulatory effects of the dipeptides on phosphorylase are uniquely related to

dipeptide structure as is evident from the studies on the effects of the consti-

tuent free amino acids on phosphorylases. The specificity of the effects of

carnosine and anserine on phosphorylase markedly contrasts with earlier

observations on the putative physiological effects of carnosine on fructose

1,Gbisphosphatase (10) and myofibrillar ATPase (23,24) which were not specific

to the dipeptide and could be elicited by other imidazole compounds.

In addition to activation of phosphorylase in the presence of the allosteric

activator AMP, the dipeptides also increased the activities of both phosphorylase

forms in the presence of the allosteric inhibitors ATP, D-glucose and caffeine,

and anserine could also exert its inhibitory effect in the presence of these

inhibitors. These initial studies do not indicate if carnosine and anserine

are binding to the previously identified nucleoside and glucose allosteric sites

on phosphorylase (21), or if separate binding sites exist on the enzyme for the

774

Page 7: Regulation of muscle phosphorylase activity by carnosine and anserine

Vol. 109, No. 3, 1982 BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS

dipeptides. More detailed kinetic investigations of the effects of carnosine

and anserine on phosphorylase are in progress to answer these questions and to

investigate the possible physiological significance of these findings.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This research was supported in part by N.I.H. grant AM 27155 to P.J.K.

REFERENCES

Crush, K.G. (1970) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 34, 3-30. Davey, C.L. (1960) Arch. Biochem, Biophys. g, 303-308. McManus, I,R,, 444-453.

and Benson, M.S. (1967) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. l'&,

Tamaki, N., Nakamura, M., Harada, M,, Kimura, K., Kawano, H. and Hama, T, (1977) J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. 23, 319-329, Abraham, D., 3, 210-213,

Pisano, J.J. and Udenfriend, S. (1962) Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

Bauer, K., Hallermayer,‘K., Salnikow, J., (1982) Jo Biol. Chem. 257, 3593-3597.

Kleinkauff, H. and Hamprecht, B.

Margolis, F.L. (1974) Science 184, 909-911. Avena, R.M. and Bowen, W.J. (l%!T) J. Biol. Chem. _244, 1600-1604. Parker, C.J. and Ring, E. (1970) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 413-419. Ikeda, T., Kimura, K., Hama, T., and Tamaki, N. (1980) J.Biochem. 87-, 179-185. Brown, C.E. and Antholine, W.E. (1979) J. Phys. Chem. 83, 3314-3319. Margolis, F.L. (1978) Trends Neurosci. 1, 42-44. Fitzpatrick, D., Amend, J.F., Squibb, R,L. and Fisher, H. (1980) Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med. 165, 404-408. Kasvinsky, P.J.,Techosky, S., and Fletterick, R.J. (1978) J. Biol. Chem. 253, 9102-9106. Fischer, E.H, and Krebs, E.C. (1962) Methods Enzymol. 2, 369-373. Kasvinsky, P.J. and Madsen, N.B., (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 6852-6859. Helmreich, E. and Cori, C.F. (1964) Proc. Natl. Acad. SC USA 51, 131-138. Maddaiah, V.T. and Madsen, N.B, (1966) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 38733881. Engers, H.D., Shechosky, S. and Madsen, N.B. (1970) Can, J. Biochem, 48 746-754.

-

Engers, H.D. and Madsen, N.B, (1968) Biochem. Biophys.Res. Commun. 33, 49-54. Fletterick, R.J. and Madsen, N.B. (1980) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 49, 31-m. Segel, I.H. (1975) Enzyme Kinetics, pp 481-492, Wiley-Interssence, New York. Yun, J. and Parker, C.J. (1965) Biochim, Biophys. Acta 110, 212-214. Bowen, W.3, (1965) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. l'& 436-443.

715


Recommended