Gaitskell
PH0008Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity
Lecture 11 (Special Relativity)
020322v3
Relativistic DynamicsCollision, Mass depends on velocity, energy-momentum
invariant, Compton Effect
Prof Rick Gaitskell
Department of PhysicsBrown University
Main source at Brown Course Publisher
background material may also be available at http://gaitskell.brown.edu
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Section: Special Relativity Week 4
• Homework (due for M 3/18)o Hand in now
• Reading (Prepare for 3/18)
o SpecRel (also by French)• Ch6 RelativisticKinematics
• Lecture 10 (M 3/18)o Relativistic Dynamics
• From Classical -> Relativistic
• What Conservation Laws can we rely on?• Expressions for m, E and p
• Collisions
• Lecture 11 (W 3/20)o Relativistic Dynamics
• Collisions
• Newton’s 2nd Law
• Compton Effect
• Lecture 12 (F 3/22)o Relativistic Dynamics
• Summary
• Review Problem Set
• Reading (Prepare for 4/1 after recess)
o SpecRel• Revise Ch2-6 (look at Ch 1 also)
o QuantMech• Ch1,2 & 3
• Homework #8 (M 4/1)o (see web “Assignments”)
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Exam II Timing
• 4/8 (Monday) 8.30 am Start
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Homework
• Please pick up your HW #1-4 from outside my office B&H 516o Definitely there
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Question SectionQuestion Section
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Question SpecRel L11-Q1
•Which relativistic expression correctly gives the totalmass of moving particle, velocity b(g) rest mass m0?
o(1)
o(2)
o(3)
o(4)
†
m = bm0
†
m = gbm0
†
m = gm0
†
m = g 2m0
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Question SpecRel L12-Q2
•How big was the ice sheet that just fell off AntarcticIce Cap?
o(1) Block Island
o(2) Manhattan Island
o(3) Rhode Island
o(4) Who cares?Photo AFP / NY Times
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Classical -> Relativistic Dynamics - “1 page”• Conservation of Energy & Mass are combined• Conservation of Momentum - still good
o but mass term is no longer invariant
†
m = g m0
E = g m0c2
p = gbm0c
E 2 = (pc)2 + (m0c2)2
KE = E - m0c2
= g -1( )m0c2
†
p = gbm0c
(cp)2 = g 2b 2(m0c2)2 g 2 =
11- b 2 fi b 2 =
g 2 -1g 2
= g 2 -1( )(m0c2)2
= g 2(m0c2)2 -(m0c
2)2
= E 2 -(m0c2)2
†
Consider KE for b <<1
KE = E - m0c2
= g -1( )m0c2
g =1
1- b 2( )12
ª 1+12
b 2 + ...Ê
Ë Á
ˆ
¯ ˜
ª 1+12
b 2 + ...-1Ê
Ë Á
ˆ
¯ ˜ m0c
2
ª12
b 2m0c2 + ...
ª12
m0v2 + ...
which is the classical form
†
b†
g
†
1
†
1
†
0
†
10
†
Consider p for b <<1p = gbm0c
g =1
1- b 2( )12
ª 1+12
b 2 + ...Ê
Ë Á
ˆ
¯ ˜
ª b +12
b 3 + ...Ê
Ë Á
ˆ
¯ ˜ m0c
ª bcm0 + ...ª m0v + ...
which is the classical form
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Collision treated inCollision treated inRelativistic DynamicsRelativistic Dynamics
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Elastic Collision: (Extract m(v))
• Centre of Mass Frame S’
• Particle A Stationary Frame S
†
¢ b B
†
¢ b A†
¢ m B
†
¢ m A
†
bB
†
bA†
mB
†
mA
x
y
x’
y’b
†
(Assume ¢ S is moving at b in S.)
Usual velocity transforms apply
¢ b x =bx - b( )1- bxb( )
¢ b y =by g( )
1- bxb( )
bx =¢ b x + b( )
1+ ¢ b xb( )by =
¢ b y g( )1+ ¢ b xb( )
We will show that the masses of particles(used in momentum expression mv) are afunction of the particle velocities i.e. p=m(v)vMasses transform between frames in a waythat is similar to the transforms for lengthsand times
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Elastic Collision: (Extract m(v)) (2)
• Centre of Mass Frame S’
• Particle A Stationary Frame S
†
¢ b B
†
¢ b A†
¢ m B
†
¢ m A
†
bB
†
bA†
mB
†
mA
x
y
x’
y’b
†
(Assume ¢ S is moving at b in S.)
Usual velocity transforms apply
¢ b x =bx - b( )1- bxb( )
¢ b y =by g( )
1- bxb( )
bx =¢ b x + b( )
1+ ¢ b xb( )by =
¢ b y g( )1+ ¢ b xb( )
†
In ¢ S (Centre of Mass Frame) collision is symmetric¢
r b A = - ¢
r b B fi ¢ b xA = - ¢ b xB = -b( ) ¢ b yA = - ¢ b yB
¢ m A = ¢ m B
Conservation of Momentum in S(Elastic Collision)DpyA + DpyB = 0
DpyA = 2mAbyAcDpyB = 2mBbyBc
So mAbyA = -mBbyB
Use Velocity Transformation
mA
¢ b yA g
1+ b ¢ b xA
= -mB
¢ b yB g
1+ b ¢ b xB
mA
¢ b yA g
1- b 2 = mB
¢ b yA g
1+ b 2
mB
mA
=1+ b 2
1- b 2
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Elastic Collision: (Extract m(v)) (3)
• Centre of Mass Frame S’
• Particle A Stationary Frame S
†
¢ b B
†
¢ b A†
¢ m B
†
¢ m A
†
bB
†
bA†
mB
†
mA
x
y
x’
y’b
†
(Assume ¢ S is moving at b in S.)
Usual velocity transforms apply
¢ b x =bx - b( )1- bxb( )
¢ b y =by g( )
1- bxb( )
bx =¢ b x + b( )
1+ ¢ b xb( )by =
¢ b y g( )1+ ¢ b xb( )
†
So we havemB
mA
=1+ b 2
1- b 2
Re - express in terms of bxB
bxB =¢ b xB + b( )
1+ ¢ b xBb( )Given ¢ b xB = b
bxB =2b( )
1+ b 2( )So
mB
mA
=1
1- bxB2( )
12
= g xB
†
If we wish to ensure Conservation of Momentumin S frame, we must conclude that apparentmass in a given frame is transformed
m = g m0where m0 is the rest mass (in the rest frame of the particle)
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Elastic Collision: (Extract m(v)) (4)
• Centre of Mass Frame S’
• Particle A Stationary Frame S†
¢ b B
†
¢ b A†
¢ m B
†
¢ m A
†
bB
†
bA Æ 0†
mB
†
mA = m0
x
y
x’
y’b
†
(Assume ¢ S is moving at b in S.)
Usual velocity transforms apply
¢ b x =bx - b( )1- bxb( )
¢ b y =by g( )
1- bxb( )
bx =¢ b x + b( )
1+ ¢ b xb( )by =
¢ b y g( )1+ ¢ b xb( )
†
So we havemB
mA
=1+ b 2
1- b 2
Re - express in terms of bxB
bxB =¢ b xB + b( )
1+ ¢ b xBb( )Given ¢ b xB = b
bxB =2b( )
1+ b 2( )So
mB
mA
=1
1- bxB2( )
12
= g xB
†
So if we wish to ensure Conservation of Momentumin S frame, we must conclude that apparentmass in any given frame is transformed
m = g m0where m0 is the rest mass (in the rest frame of the particle)
†
The final "trick" is to imagine the collisionin the limiting case that the y componentsof velocities go to zero...
In this case byB , ¢ b yB Æ 0 bxB Æ bB
byA , ¢ b yA Æ 0 bxA Æ 0 (rest frame of A)The eqn
mB
mA
=1
1- bxB2( )
12
= g xB
can be re - expressed as the more general relationmB
m0
=1
1- bB2( )
12
= gB
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Newton’s 2nd Law & Kinetic Energy
†
Remember !m = g m0
E = mc2 = g m0c2
p = mv = g m0( ) bc( ) = gbm0c
†
Consider KE for b <<1
KE = E - m0c2
= g -1( )m0c2
g =1
1- b 2( )12
ª 1+12
b 2 + ...Ê
Ë Á
ˆ
¯ ˜
ª 1+12
b 2 + ...-1Ê
Ë Á
ˆ
¯ ˜ m0c
2
ª12
b 2m0c2 + ...
ª12
m0v2 + ...
which is the classical form
†
r F = dr p
dt=
d gm0r u ( )
dt
K =r F .d
r l
v= 0
v= u
ÚConsider special case along x
= Fdxv= 0
v= u
Ú
=d mu( )
dtdx
0
u
Ú
= ud mu( )0
u
Ú since dxdt
= u
= u mdu + udm( )0
u
ÚCan show (see next slide)
mudu + u2dm = c 2dm
= c 2dmm0
m
Ú= mc2 - m0c
2
= g -1( )m0c2 since m = g m0
K = E - m0c2
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Newton’s 2nd Law & Kinetic Energy (2)
†
Discussion of the following steps
(1) ud mu( )0
u
Ú
= u mdu + udm( )0
u
Ú
(2) mudu + u2dm = c 2dm
= c 2dmm0
m
Ú †
(1) Differentiation, by parts gives, d mu( ) = mdu + udm
The full (technically correct) expression is,
d mu( ) =∂(mu)
∂u m constdu +
∂(mu)∂m u const
dm
= mdu + udm
†
(2) This step is a little trickier mudu + u2dm = c 2dm
We know that
m = gm0 =m0
1- u2 c 2( )12
Som2c 2 - m2u2 = m0
2c 2
Form the derivatived(m2c 2) - d(m2u2) - d(m0
2c 2) = 0d(m2c 2)
dmdm -
∂(m2u2)∂m u const
dm +∂(m2u2)
∂u m const
duÊ
Ë Á Á
ˆ
¯ ˜ ˜ - 0 = 0
The last term is d(m02c 2) is zero as argument is a constant
2mc 2dm - 2mu2dm + m22udu( ) = 0fi 2m(c 2 - u2)dm - 2m2udu = 0Divide by 2m and rearrangefi u2dm + mudu = c 2dm
PH0008 Gaitskell Class Spring2002 Rick Gaitskell
Energy and Momentum
†
Givenm = g m0
E = g m0c2
p = gbm0c
Then(cp)2 = g 2b 2(m0c
2)2
But g 2 =1
1- b 2 fi b 2 =g 2 -1
g 2
So(cp)2 = g 2 -1( )(m0c
2)2
= g 2(m0c2)2 -(m0c
2)2
= E 2 -(m0c2)2
orE 2 = (pc)2 + (m0c
2)2
E 2 = p2 + m02 with c =1
†
Lorentz InvariantE 2 - (pc)2 = (m0c
2)2
(m0c2)2 = ¢ E 2 - ( ¢ p c)2
= ¢ E 2 - ( ¢ p c)2
= ¢ ¢ E 2 - ( ¢ ¢ p c)2...(Consider also rest frame E and p)
†
Massless particleE 2 = (pc)2
E = pcNote also that
pE
=gbm0cg m0c
2 =bc
=vc 2