REPORT FMPC OUTFALL PIPELINE INVESTIGATION GRAVEL PACK … · 2008. 8. 19. · Based on the results...

451

FINAL REPORT FMPC OUTFALL PIPELINE INVESTIGATION GRAVEL PACK STUDY AND INTEGRITY TESTING JULY 1990

07-0 1 = 1990

WMCOIDOE 200 REPORT

\

I I I ' I I

' B II I I I I I I, I* I I I e I

-

FINAL REPORT

FMPC OUTFALL PIPELINE INVESTIGATION

GRAVEL PACK STUDY AND

INTEGRITY TESTING

JULY 1990

TABLE of CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION - Executive Summa ry..................

Health And Safety Practices ........................ Gravel Pack Testing

Background .................................. Procedure ................................... Results ..................................... Background .................................. Procedure .................................... Results .....................................

Pipeline Integrity Testing

Future Actions......................................

Page 1

2

3 4 9

11 11 15

16

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment I

Attachment I1

Attachment I11 -

Attachment IV

Attachment V

Attachment VI

Results of the Radiochemical Analysis of the FMPC Outfall Pipeline Gravel Pack

Boring Logs of the Sampling Done Along the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

Chain of Custody Forms for the Sampling Done Along the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

Subsurface Soil Sample Collection Log for Sampling Done Along the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

NASSCO and ASTM Specifications

Data from Pneumatic Integrity Testing

ii

LIST o f TABLES

T a b l e Description Page 9 1 Gravel Pack Sampling Results.... .......

13 2 NASSCO Specifications List ............. 3 Pneumatic Testing Results.............. 15

___-___-_---------_--_------------------------ ___I___-_____--_--------_----------------------

Figure

1

2

3

Outfall

LIST of FIGURES

Description

Pipeline Elevation configuration...........................

Outfall Pipeline Boring Locations......

Outfall Pipeline Sampling Strategy ..... (Crossectional View)

Outfall Pipeline Sampling Technique .... Typical Manhole Configuration...... .... Pipeline Plug

River Outfall

Configuration.

Configuration.

. . . . e . . . . . .

...........

Page

5

6

7

8

12

14

17

iii 7 3

INTRODUCTION - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Order 14 of the Director's Findings and Orders (DFO), issued and effective on June 26fh, 1987, and section 4.12 of the Consent Decree between the U . S . Department of Energy and the State of Ohio, signed in December 1988, call for an examination of the outfall pipeline to determine if the line is transporting contaminants to the Great Miami River (GMR) buried valley aquifer. This task was subdivided into two efforts.

The first effort was to examine the gravel pack surrounding the pipeline, by soil sampling, to determine whether excessive amounts of contaminants were present. If high levels of contaminants were discovered it would be interpreted as an indicator of pipeline leakage.

The second effort was the actual testing of the line integrity. There are three basic types of testing that could have been done to determine if the line was leaking: hydrostatic testing, pneumatic testing, and flow measurement testing. The pneumatic testing method was chosen because it was more readily adaptable to testing the line on a section by section basis, the pneumatic method is as accurate (on a qualitative basis) as the hydrostatic method, and because the pneumatic testing method requires less equipment to perform, less preparation of each manhole, and less time between section tests. The flow measurement method was initially considered, and subsequently abandoned because the accuracy of the test was questionable.

The results of both the gravel pack borings (Table 1 and Attachment I) and the pneumatic tests (Table 3 and Attachment VI) indicate that the outfall pipeline is not leaking in the sections from manhole 175 to 176, 176 to 177, 177 to 178, 178 to 179, and 180 to 181. The results of the integrity testing indicate that the line is leaking in the section from manhole 179 to 180.

While the FMPC previously indicated that the section of the outfall pipeline from manhole 181 to the GMR would not be tested due to inaccessibility, an attempt was made to perform an integrity test on this section. The Feed Materials Production Center contracted a diver to place a plug in the end of the outfall line, to facilitate testing the last section of line. As previously suspected, the last section of line from manhole 181 to the GMR could not be tested as a result of fast water current, muddy water conditions, and the divers inability to locate the end of the pipeline. The end of pipeline could not be located because it is covered with concrete "Rip Rap".

Based on the results of the gravel pack testing, which was performed on the final section, and the results of the integrity testing performed on the section of the outfall line from manhole 180 to 181 (which is similar in length and slope), further attempts will not be made to test the final section of the FMPC outfall pipeline.

p 4

i

HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICES

The integrity testing was delayed from the originally planned execution date of March 24th, 1990 due an assessment of the applicability of the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120 to the project. The regulation, which became effective on March 6th, 1990, requires all personnel performing cleanup work at hazardous waste sites to have a minimum of 24 hours (for occasional workers) of hazardous work related training. The training must also be related to the site specific hazards associated with the particular site. The situation was analyzed, and the decision was made that additional training was required to meet the concepts and requirements of 29 CFR 1910.120.

The originally planned testing date was abandoned, and the contractor personnel were enrolled into an EPA sponsored school, which satisfied all the requirements of the regulation. The contract personnel attended the school, taught by the NUS Corporation on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, during the week of April 1 6 t h , 1990.

The boring/sampling done along the lower sections of the pipeline was completed by Penn Drilling Company, a subcontractor to Advanced Sciences Inc. All drilling and sampling was done in accordance with established health & safety and sampling procedures which were originally incorporated as part of the Remedial Investigation / Feasibility Study (RI/FS) of the FMPC and surrounding areas.

Prior to and during work being done for the pneumatic testing process, stringent health and safety practices were followed. The outfall pipeline was shut down during the entire pneumatic testing process, and the valves were tagged and notations were made in the operations log to insure that they would not be inadvertently opened during the task performance.

Each manhole was first tested for the presence of Radon gas by a Radiation Technologist (RT). Two of the manholes showed radon presence, but the levels were not in a range to prevent entry by the contract workers without Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBAs). While the radon levels present were within limits for non-SCBA work, an additional safety precaution was used. Each manhole lid was removed and, prior to personnel entry, an "invert blower11 (the intake of the blower is the air in the manhole, and the exhaust of the blower is the atmosphere) was placed over the manhole and allowed to operate for a full five minutes (minimum), The manhole was then rechecked by the Radiation Technologist to be certain that all traces of radon gas had dissipated. After determination that Radon gas was not present, or present in trace amounts, an Industrial Hygienist (IH) checked each manhole for oxygen deficiency and combustible gas content.

2 5

I

After the confined entry permit was filled out and signed by the IH, the RT entered each manhole and took llswipell samples of the manhole interior, to insure that surface contamination levels were not high enough to prevent entry. After the RT confirmed that the levels of contamination were sufficiently low enough to allow entry, the contractors were allowed to proceed.

All contract personnel were required to provide urine samples prior to initiating work and after completion of the job. All contractor personnel wore FMPC TLD badges during the performance of their jobs.

The contractor personnel, working inside the manhole, wore paper protection coveralls, rubber boots, rubber gloves, hard hats, and safety glasses. Each time a contractor came out of the manhole, after performing whatever task needed to be done, the RT performed a complete scan of the individual's protective clothing and equipment. Any contaminated equipment or clothing was either decontaminated by the RT or bagged in plastic bags, marked as contaminated, in accordance with established DOE procedures. The contract personnel were required to remain next to the manhole until thorough decontamination had been accomplished and the RT had run a complete scan and determined the individual to be contaminant free.

Contractor personnel entering a manhole were required to wear a safety harness with a rope attached to it. The rope was attached to a hand crank winch on a tripod, placed above the manhole opening. The system was utilized as a safety backup for personnel retrieval in the event of an accident. The contractor also had an Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) standing by, to facilitate personnel retrieval if required. Visual and vocal contact was maintained at all times with contractor personnel while they were in any of the manholes performing work.

GRAVEL PACK BAKPLING - BACKGROUND Ten borings along the outfall pipeline, from manhole 180 to the Great Miami River, were completed between February 16th and February lgth, 1990. The first boring was initiated on February 13th, but during the operation it was noted that the I1as built" drawings being used to guide the depth of the borings did not accurately portray the existing situation. Through soil erosion and natural consolidation, the crown depths of the section of pipe from manhole 180 to manhole 181 were not as deep as they appeared to be on the drawings. This observation required a re-assessment of the crown depths of the line area being investigated. After probing for and determining the actual pipeline crown depth, work was resumed.

The area under investigation for the gravel pack analysis, which was mutually established by representatives of the USEPA, OEPA, and the FMPC, was designated to be from manhole 180 to the Great Miami River.

n 3

The section from manhole 180 to the GMR was chosen because the gravel pack surrounding the pipeline would act as a flconduitla and tend to cause accumulation of any contaminants leaking from the pipe into the area surrounding the lowest elevated section of the line, and because of the relatively flat slope of these sections of the sewer.

Figures 1 & 2 illustrate the positioning of the pipeline, the boring locations, and the manholes. Boring locations were jointly agreed upon by representatives of the USEPA, OEPA, and the FMPC. Examination of the placement of the borings shows that they were fairly evenly spaced throughout the pipeline run from manhole 180 to the Great Miami River. The exception to this is the close placement of two sample positions adjacent to State Route 128. Since the pipeline runs under the road, particular attention was paid to this area since it would seem to be a "high stressg8 section of pipeline and possibly subject to accelerated corrosion or damage.

GRAVEL PACK SAMPLING - PROCEDURE

Figure 3 shows the approximate placement of each of the borings with respect to the particular section of the pipeline involved. Continuous eighteen inch (18") split-spoon samples were collected, beginning at a depth of approximately two (2) feet above the crown of the pipeline and continuing until a depth of approximately thirty two (32) inches below the invert elevation of the pipeline. There were four (4) split spoon samples per boring. Copies of the boring logs are included as Attachment 11. Quality Assurance/Quality Control samples (Trip Blanks, etc) were collected as necessary to fulfill the protocols defined in the "FMPC RI/FS Work Plan Revision 3 " and Supporting Documents; (ASI; March, 1988). Strict chain-of-custody was observed on all sample transfers, and copies are included as Attachment III.

The four 18 inch split spoon samples extracted from each boring were sub-divided into three (3) six inch ( 6 " ) segments and each segment was tested in the field for KNu, alpha activity, and beta/gamma activity. Figure 4 illustrates the division process. Four (4) of the six inch samples, one from each of the original four split spoon samples, were selected for further analysis, based on direct measurements recorded in the field and, in the best professional judgement of the geologist guiding drilling operations, representative ofthe elevation spectrum. The selected samples were transferred to the IT laboratory for analysis of the following constituents:

0 Total uranium (pCi/g - picocuries per gram) 0 Total thorium (pCi/g) 0 Technicium 99 (ppm - parts per million) 0 Gamma Spectroscopy

4

n Z Q

Q z ii

0 B c

I t

8

cv W a

ii l a I I

9

’%- rn W d a 2 cn

4r

10

I- m

I- m

I- m

b *

he remaining samples, which exhibited lower levels of activity he field tests were archived for possible future analysis. I Table 1 shows an overview of the gravel pack sampling resul

GRAVEL PACK SAMPLING - RESULTS

451-

during

ts for total thorium, total uranium, and HNu values observed during borings. The samples were also tested for Technicium 99 and and the presence of gamma emitting radionuclides (gamma spectroscopy). Copies of the overall test results are included a’s Attachment I, and the subsurface soil sample logs are included as Attachment IV.

I While the sampling results indicate several samples exhibiting above background concentrations, the relative distribultion level of these values was consistant in samples collected above and below the invert of the pipeline. These values are thought attributable to normal fluxuations and to the presence of phosphate fertilizers in the overlying cornfield. Both uranium and thorium are present in the phosphates used to manufacture modern fertilizers. This conclusion is further supported by the findings of the pneumatic testing.

**

BORING SAMPLE NUMBER NUMBER

1534 ** 00452 00455 00459 00462 00465 00468 00472 00474

1525

TABLE 1 ugl g TOTAL THORIUM

5 .0 11.0

3 . 0 3 . 0 7 . 0 5 . 0

c4 .0 X5.0

uglg TOTAL URANIUM

1 1 . 6 1 0 . 1

9.3 6 . 3 9 . 6 7 . 2 8 . 8 9 . 5

BORING BNU

READING

0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0

00400 6 .0 13 .9 0.0 00403 <3 .0 9 . 5 0 .0 00407 4 .0 12 .3 0 .0 00410 8 . 0 6 . 9 0.0

. . . .

. .-

The boring logs ref lect the nunber 1534 because the original senples were taken too deep. . I t was discovered that the pipeline i s not as deeply buried as the drawings indicated, so the ent ire series was redone to insure useable results. (The 1524 semples were not used).

9 12 ”

TABLE 1

TOTAL THORIUM

ug/g (cont d)

ug/g TOTAL URANIUM

BORING BNU

READING BORING NUMBER

SAMPLE NUMBER

1526 00414 00415 00420 00421

4 .0 7 . 0

< 4 . 0 2 . 0

2 7 . 1 9 . 7

1 8 . 1 8 . 4

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1527 00426 00428 00432 00435 00439 00444 00445 00448

6 .0 7 . 0 6 . 0

c3 .0 6 .0

c4 .0 <4 .0 < 4 . 0

6 . 9 11.1

9 . 2 5 .9

10.0 7 . 8 8 . 7 7 . 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1528

1529 00478 00481 00484 00488

7 . 0 4 . 0 5 . 0 3 . 0

9 . 9 9.4 8 .9

10 .8

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1530 00491 00494 00494 00501

7 . 0 6 . 0 8 . 0 3 . 0

11 .8 15 .6

6.3 8 .4

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1 5 3 1

1532

00505 00507 00510 00513

c 4 . 0 4 . 0 3 . 0 4 . 0

9 .2 9 .7 8 . 2 7 . 5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

00531 00533 00536 00539

6 . 0 3 . 0

1 2 . 0 6 . 0

9 .5 15.3 31 .2 11 .5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1533 00546 00547 00550 00552 00559 00560 00562 00564

6 . 0 5 . 0

<4 .0 c 4 . 0

5 . 0 6 . 0 4 . 0

<4 .0

8 .6 15.2

7 . 7 4 . 5 8 .7

10.3 13 .6

6 . 5

0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0.0

10 13

45t PIPELINE INTEGRITY TESTING - BACKGROUND

The pipeline integrity testing was performed on April 28th, 1990. As previously stated, the pneumatic testing method was used. The need to comply with 29 CFR 1910.120 required delay of the testing date. After all contract personnel had reveived the necessary training, the pneumatic testing of the outfall pipeline was rescheduled and completed. An independent testing contractor, Advanced Companies, was contracted to complete the actual pipeline pneumatic testing.

The National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) specifications for relined sewer pipe testing were determined to be the specification to be utilized as the pass/fail criteria. The NASSCO Specification for relined pipe represents the most stringent method currently used in industry.

Upon completion of the original testing field activities, contract personnel undertook the task of compiling a final report for the pneumatic testing results. Duringthis period, it was determined that the subcontractor, Advanced Companies, had failed to perform the testing in accordance with the designated NASSCO specifications, as stipulated in the scope of work. The subcontractor, indicated that they were following the ASTM specification, No. C 828 - 86. Following an evaluation of the two specifications, it was determined that the NASSCO speification was the most restrictive method. For this reason the testing was redone, with strict adherence to the NASSCO specification. The NASSCO specification and the ASTM specification are included as Attachment V.

AC agreed that additional re-testing would be required, in order to fulfill the terms of the contract and comply with the more stringent NASSCO specification. AC also agreed that no additional funding would be made for the re-testing work. Re-testing of the outfall line was scheduled for June 16, 1990.

PIPELINE INTEGRITY TESTING - PROCEDURE The as-specified testing was performed on June 16th, as scheduled. Figure 5 illustrates a representative manhole configuration. The actual manholes were of various heights, between the bottom of the pipe and the lid of the manhole, and some of the manholes are designed as pressurized units, but the general configuration is the same.

Prior to performing any testing, millwrights removed each manhole lid and, as stated previously, the manhole was ventilated for a full five minutes.

The only manhole that did not have this procedure performed prior to entry was manhole 175. Since manhole 175 is a sump, covered only by personnel safety grating, and since there were no traces of radon present in this manhole, the area was considered safe for entry without the procedure being performed.

11 1 4

451-

FIGURE 5

REPRESENTATIVE MANHOLE CONFIGURATION

. . . . . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OUTFALL LINE

ACCESSES TO OUTFALL

ppELNsEcTK)NpDs '

OUTFALL UNE

15

After each manhole was ventilated with the invert blower, and certified acceptable by a Radiation Technologist, a Industrial Hygienist checked the manhole for oxygen deficiency and explosive gas mixtures. Only after the Industrial Hygienist had certified the manhole safe, through issuance of a confined space entry permit, were the contract workers allowed to proceed.

Each section of the pipeline was pressurized utilizing fifteen inch, metal based, inflatable plugs at either end. The plug configuration is illustrated in Figure 6. An expandable rubber bladder around each plug allows the diameter of the plug to be increased to seal off the line opening. After both plugs were in place, compressed air was introduced into the line until an internal line pressure of four (4) psig was attained. The compressor was then isolated fromthe pipeline section and a two (2) minute I1stabilization1l period was initiated.

The stabilization period allows time for the air pressure and temperature to become uniform throughout the pipe section. The NASSCO specification allows up to a 0.5 psig drop in air pressure during the stabilization period. If the length of the line caused the pressure drop to exceed 0.5 psig during the stabilization period, additional air was added to maintain the stabilization pressure at 3.5 psig. The interior line pressure was noted on the form at the end of the two minute stabilization period, and the noted pressure was utilized for the beginning of the actual eight (8) minute test.

The NASSCO specification for 16 inch diameter pipe allows up to a 0.5 psig drop in line pressure over the eight (8) minute period in order for the line tested to be considered as having passed the test. The NASSCO specification also calls for an immediate re-test of any line section that experiences a psig decrease greater than 0.5 over a ten (10) minute period. If the line in question passes the second test within the eight minute margin, the line is considered to have passed. Table I1 gives a summary of the NASSCO specification:

TABLE 2

Stabilization period 2 minutes Allowable pressure drop ** 0.5 psig

** Air can be added to maintain < 0.5 psig drop

Testing Period Allowable pressure drop

8 minutes 0.5 psig

If pressure drop of > 0 . 5 psig noted before 8 min. ; line fails

If pressure drop of > 0 . 5 psig noted after 8 min. but before 10 min.; line passes, but must be retested and pass again.

13 16

W z i W n h

(3 LL1 + 7 0 I- n u1 C/) 3 W

>- I-

a

(3 3 1 n

/

P 17

OUTFALL LINE INTEGRITY TESTING - RESULTS According to the test results obtained, all sections of the pipeline passed inspection with the exception of one (The data collected in the field is included as Attachment VI.) The section that failed was the pipeline section between manholes 179 and 180. Testing was attempted three times, and all attempts resulted in failure. The section from manhole 181to the Great Miami River could not be tested because the end of the outfall line could not be accessed. Table 3 lists the final results of the pneumatic testing.

TABLE 3

(note: MH indicates manhole)

Pneumatic Integrity Testing Results

Pipeline Section Testing Results

MH 175 to 176 PASSED




MH 179 to 180

MH 180 to 181

MH 181 to GMR

FAILED

PASSED

NO TEST

A video camera with lighting was run between manhole 179 and manhole 180, to allow a visual examination of the line section. The integrity of the line appears to be good (no noted cracks, breaks , or crushed areas, however several lldislocatedll joints were noted. The dislocations appeared to be 1/4" to 3 / 8 " . These dislocated joints are assumed to be the cause of the leakage observed.

Figure 7 illustrates the conditions observed, by the diver, upon entering the river to plug the final outfall of the line. Apparently, the RIP-RAP used during the line rehabilitation performed in the 19701s, to protect the end of the outfall line, has shifted: The action of hydraulic forces ofthe river have repositioned large pieces of the concrete Rip Rap, and those pieces now cover the end of the pipeline.

15 18

2- 19

Since the gravel pack testing does not substantiate the theory that the section of the outfall pipeline from manhole 181 to the GMR is leaking and the section resides entirely within the flood plain of the GMR, further attempts to test this section of the pipeline will not be undertaken.

FUTURE ACTIONS

The FMPC is currently investigating methods to repair the outfall pipeline section from manhole 179 to 180. The methods under consideration include a "State of the Arttt sliplining method and an ItInsituformtt epoxy resin relining method. A proposal defining the selected course of action will be fowarded under separate cover.

17 -20

ATTACHMENT

Results of Radiochemical Analysis FMPC Outfall Pipeline Gravel Pack

of the Testing

21

Rid e REPORT 04!25/90 16: 35: 29

Wort Order # so-02-148

PREPARED I T / R A D I U I C A L SCIENCES LAB. BY 1550 Bu\R CREEK ROAD

OAKRIDGE, TN37831

A m m PHOE 615-482-9707 CONTACT JIM DILLMD

TEST COOES and NAI(Es FOR# FOR REPORTIN DATA

TC-99 THORIM! TOTAL U-TOTAL

used on t h i s report

22

451, ITRSl

02/23/90

00478

PARAtErER I)-TOTAL RU-106 K-40 cs-137 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 WTOTAL

00481

PAAMETER U-TOTAL K-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 R4-228 TH-234 cs-137 TC-W TH-TOTAL

Oak Ridge REPORT Wart. Order I; M - M Results b g Sarple

FRACTION 0 2 TEST CODE ASIRPT NAE FORH FOR REPORTING DATA Date & T i r e Collected 0 2 / 1 B / w b t e g o r g 41610

RESUT 9.90 (1.0 17.15 (0.2 1.09 0.89 0.87 0.80 2.65 (0.9 7

24IW ERACN 268

244

0.41 0. 14 0.12 0.21 0.45

2

WITS w 9 p C i / g pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g pC i /g ug/g

FRACTION T S T CODE ASIRPT NAIB: FCRH FOR RW3RTIK DATA Date & T i r e Collected 0 2 / l S / w C a t e g o r y 41610

RESUT 9.41 16.2 I. 33 0.97 1.11 0.78 2 19 0.11 (0.9 4

S I G M ERROR 263 3.0 0.04 0. 15 0. 1s 0.21 0.46 0.07

1

WITS w g p C i / g p C i / g pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g w g

23

ITRSL 02/23/w

00484

P A R K E R U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

PARCvlRER U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 R4-224 R4-226 R4-226 ni-234 CS-137 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

O a k Ridge REPORT Uork Order 8 S0-02-148 R e s u l t s by Sample

FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT NA#E FfHfl FOA REPORTING DATA Date & Time C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 B / W Category 41610

R N T 8.88 15.6 1. 15 0.79 0.79 0.74 2 49 (0.9 5

24IW ERROR 2 41 2.20 0 . 3 0.12 0. 11 0. 18 0.41

2

UNITS ug/9 pCi/g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g ug /g

FRACTIIN EST CODE ASIRPT NCVBE FORH F(3R REPIXTING DATA Date & Time C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 W Category 4-

RESUT 10.8 14.0 1.21 1.04 1. 12 0.93 3. 12 0.08 (0 .9 3

2-SIW ERROR 3.30 280 0.43 0.16 0.17 0.29 0.62 0.06

2

UNITS u g h pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g ug/g

451

ITRSL 02/23/90

00559

PMlvgTER U-TOTAL K-40 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-39 TH-TOTAL

P A R M X R u-TOTAL K-40 Pa-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH.234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

Oat Ridge REPORT Uork Order # 50-02-148 Results b q Saqle

FRACTIOW 0% TEST CODE ASIRPT NAE FURH FOR REPORTING DATA Date & TireCollected 0 2 / 1 9 / w Category riX24

RESllLT 8.67 13.9 0.75 0.98 0.67 2. 12 (0.9 5

HIM4 ERROA 2.46 2 6 7 0. 13 0. 15 0.25 0.45

2

WITS WY pCi /g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g u!/g

FRACTION TEST CODE M I f ’ T WE FW FOR REPORTING DATA Date I Tire Collected 02/19/w Category 41m

RESUT 10.3 14.7 1.17 0.69 0.75 2.42 (0.9 6

2-SIW ERROR 3-00 220 0.42 12.8 0. 12 0.47

2

UNIE

pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g w 9

W g

25

45t ITRSL

02/23/90

00562

PARAETER U-TOTAL RU-106 CS-137 K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 RA-220 TC-99 *TOTAL

PARNETER U-TOTAL RU-106 cs-137 K-40 RA-224 RA-224 TH-234 R4-228

I PB-210 TC-99 TH-TOTAL !

Oak R i d g e REPORT Work Order t 942-146 Results b y Saaple

FRACTION 0 2 TEST COX ASIRPT NAHE FORM FOR REPUITING DATA Date & Tiae C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 W Categorq 41624

RESUT 13.57 (1.0 (0.2 13.68 1.45 0.56 0.73 4.21 (0.6 (0.9 4

2-SIW ERROR 3.61

232 0. 51 0. 14 0.14 0.67

2

UNITS W g p C i / g pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g ug/g

FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT MAeg FORll FOa REPORTING DATA Date & T i r e Co l l ec ted 0 2 / 1 W Category 41624

RESUT 6.45 (1.0 (0.2 4.42 0.17 0.30 1.73 (0.5 1.45 (0.9 (4

2-SIWERROR WITS

p C i / g p C i / g

1.14 p C i / g 0.08 p C i / g 0.08 p C i / g 0.37 p C i / g

pC i /g 0. 51 p C i / g

pC i /g W g

1.87 ug/g

26

I Page 5 Im Oak Ridge REP @IT Work Order # so-02-148 Received: 02/23/W Results b y Saaple

I FRACTION 0 9 ~ TEST CODE ASIRPT F(A~Q mn FOR R E P ~ T I N G min Date & Tim Collected 0 2 / 1 W Category 4K2U I WLE ID 00531

PAR- U-TOTAL CS-137 RU-106 PH-210 RA--224 RA-226 RA-228 ltt-234 K-40 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 9. 54 (0.2 (1.0 0.86 0.55 0.66 0.54 3.15 14.53 (0.9 6

2SIW ERROR 2 49

0.37 0.11 0.10 0. 16 0.48 2 11

3

UNITS u g h pCi/g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g pCi/g p C i / g p C i / g pCifg pCifg w g

I SAIQLE ID 00533 M T I O N LOA TEST CME ASIRPT NAME F(lRtl FOR REPORTING DATA Date & T i r e o l l e c t e d W 1 W Category 41m

PARAETER U-TOTAL CS-137 Ru-106 K-40 PH-210 RA-224 RA-220 TH-234 RA-226 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESULT 15.32 1.04 a. 0 11.70 0.80 1.02 0.88 3.85 0.76 (0.9 3

2-SIWERR13R UNITS

0.18 p C i / g p C i / g

2.21 pCi/g 0.30 p C i / g 0.14 pCi/g 0.20 pCi /g 0.57 pCi/g 0.12 p C i / g

pCi/g

3.31 W g

1 wl

451

27

IlRSL O a k Ridge REPORT Work Order 4 W - 1 4 8 Received: 02/23/90 R e s u l t s b y Saaple

FRACTIW CODE ASIRPT Ncvg FORH FOR REPORTING DATA Date b Time C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 W Category 41620

I W”LE I D 0 0 5 3 6

P&RAtEER U-TOTAL RU-106 cs-1JI K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-Pe TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 31.21 (1.0 1.0 14.16 1. 13 0.84 0.78 0.99 9.07 (0.9 I2

2-SIW ERRW W I T S

pCi/g 0.15 pCi /g 2 19 pCi/g 0.41 pCi/g 0. 15 pCi/g 0.12 pCi /g 0.23 pCi/g 0.92 pCi/g

pCi/g 3 ug/g

4.70 ug/g

FRACTION 12A TEST CODE ASIRPT NA)% FORI4 MR REPmTINC DATA Date b T i a o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 W Category 41620

I !3WLE ID 00539

PARAfl€iER U-TOTAL CS-137 RU-105 K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 R A - m TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 11.48 1.11 a.00 8.18 0.67 0. 56 0. 51 0.50 3.42 (0.9 6

2-SfW ERRCH 254 0.18

1.65 0.28 0. 10 0. 10 0. 17 0. 5 1

4

UNITS

pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g W g

u4/9

28

1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Page 7 ITRSL Oat Ridge REPORT Uort Order t W2-148 Received: 02/23/90 Resul ts b y Sarple

"LE ID 00452

P A R M E R U-TOTAL K-40 PE-210 RA-224 Rh-226 Rh-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-MTAL

WLE ID 00455

FRACTION fi TEST CODE ASIRPT NWQ F(IRH FWI REPORTING DATA Date & Time Collected 0 2 / 1 m Categorq dlis13

RESUT 11.6 30.6 1.52 1.36 1.42 1.39 3.5% (0.9 5

2-SIW ERROR 3.3 3.9 0.51 0.19 0. 17 0.27 0.57

3

UNITS u 9 4 pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g pC i /g p C i / g p C i / g pCi /g ug/g

FRACTION 1 4 TEST CODE ASIRPT N M FOR14 FOR REPORTING DATA Date & T i a o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 7 / w Category 41613

PWIAIBTER U-TOT& K-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-m TH-234 TC-W TttTOTAL

RESUT 10.1 24.7 1.27 1.25 1.38 1.07 2 70 (0.9. 11

2-SIW m0R 3.0 4.2 0.43 0. 17 0. 17 0.25 0.51

3

WITS

p C i / y p C i / g pCi /g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g

u!/g

U!/9

29

ITRSL Oak Ridge REPOAT Wart Order # so-02-148 Results b y h p l e

I Page a Received: 02/23/90

FRACTION 1 5 ~ TEST c m ASIRPT WE FOAM FOR REPORTIN DATA Date & Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 W Categarq 41613

I I I I

P M r n I)-TOTAL n - 4 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESILT 9.33 10.3 1.21 0.387 0.557 0.471 3.18 (0.9 3

2 3 1 w ERRm 232 1.7 0.34 0.088 0.095 0. 186 0.46

1

WITS ug/g p C i / g p C i / g pCi/g pCi/g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g ug/g

WLE ID 00462 FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT W E FORM FOR REPORTIN DATA Date & Time Collected 0 2 / 1 W CwJarY 4m3--

PARAElER U-TUTAL n-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESU.1 6.26 7. 14 0.776 0.348 0.535 1. 77 (0.9 3

2-SIW ERROR 1.94 1. 56 0.279 0.087 0.090 0.38

1

UNITS

p C i / g pCi/g p C i / g pCi/g p C i / g p C i / g w g

u 1 4

30

I I 1 I 1 I I I I 6 I I E I I I I

?age 9 ITRSL Oat Ridge REPOIIT Work Order # so-02-148 Received: 02/23/90 Results b y Sample

WLE ID 00546 FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT NA# FORH FOR REPORTING DATA Date b Tire Collected 0 2 / l W Category 41625

PAR- u-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 8. MI 13.3 1. 14 0.701

0.677 2.42 (0 .9 6

0.774

2 3 I W ERROR 2.47 2 0 0.36 0.116 0.111 0.170 0.42

2

WITS

p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / y p C i / g

ug/g

ug/g

WLE ID 00547 FRACTION TEST COKE ASIRPT NAI(E FORH MR REPORTING DATA Date b Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 W Category 41625

451

PhRAnmR u-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 15.2 17.3 1.28 0.814 1.11 0.671 3.14 (0.9 5

2-SIW ERROR 4.2 3.5 0.52 0.185 0. 19 0.334 0.68

1

UNITS

p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g

p C i / g

u4/9

pci/g

ug/g

31

451

ITRSL O a k R i d g e REPORT Work Order # 9-02-148 Results b9 Sample

Page 10 Received: 02/23/90

I I 9wLE ID00550 FRACTION 3 TEST CODE ASIRPT NM FORPI FOR REPORTIR DATA

Date & Time Collected 0 2 / 1 v / w Category 4IZ5

PARAIgrm U-TOTAL CS-137 RU-106 U-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 RA-228 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESULT 7.71 (0.2 (1.0 6. 58 1.00 0.32 0.64 266 (0.5 (0.9 (4

24IW ERROR UNITS 209 w 9

pCi/g pCi/g

1.24 p C i / g 0.34 p C i / g 0.09 p C i / g 0.09 p C i / g 0.42 p C i / g

p C i / g p C i / g w 9

I *LE ID 00552 FRACTION a TEST CODE ASIRPT N4ll€ FORN FOR REPllflTING DATA Date & Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 W Category 4 1 a

I I I I

PARAlgrm

U-TOTAL RU-106 CS-137 K-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 RA-228 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 4.48 (1.0 (0.2 5.73 0.59 0.2% 0.49 1.44 (0.5 (0.9 (4

2-SIW ERROR WITS 1.54 W g

p C i / g p C i / g

1.25 p C i / g 0.23 p C i / g 0.07 p C i / g 0.08 p C i / g 0.32 p C i / g

p C i / g p C i / g w 9

32

Page 1 Received : 02/23/90

ITRSL Oak Rid e REPOAT 04!25/W 14: 26: 34

Wort Order I sO2-142

REPORT AWMCED SCIENcEst INC. PREPAROD IT/RADIOUIGICAL SCIENCES LAB. TO P.O. BOX 475 BY 1550 BEAR CREEK ROAD

ROSS, ffl 450616475 OM RIDGE, TN 37831

ATTEN CINDY CAPANNARI Am ERS pH019 61-707 CONTACT JIfl DILLARD

CLIENT RI FS FER WLES 28 CWANY ADvANCm SCIENCES, IN.

FACILITY 11003 MILTON CUXS ROAD AlQwED TO INCLWE TC-99 AM) TUTAL-M FM ALL FRACTIONS.

MXK ID SOIL SAMPLES TAKEN TRANS TYPE

P.O. # 866A21602d4 602.09.31 IFNOICE under separate cover

WLE IMNTIFICATION 00465 00972 Tc39 TC-99

04 00474 UTOT U-TOTAL

TEST COES and NAN3 used on this report ASIRPT FIX?! FOR REPUITING DATA

03 00468 THTM TH[RIUnToTAL

0600444 07 00445 oam ~ o o s o o

- 11 ow07 - 12 00410

E 00439

10 00403

- 13 00414 - 14 00415 15 00420 - I6 W 2 1 - 17 00426

19 00432 00435

- 18 00428

&I 00505 n_ 00507 3 00510

26 00494

24 00513 3 00491

33

I - .

I Page 2 Received: 02/23/W

451 Work Order rl SO-02-142

3 11 I t 34

Page 1 ITRSC Oat Ridge REPOAT Work Order # SO*-142 Received: 02/23/90 R e s u l t s b y Sample

!%MU ID 00465 FRACTION 01A TEST COD€ ASIRPT NcvlE FORH FOR REPORTING DATA Date & T i a e o l l e c t e d 0 2 / l m Categorp 41615

PARAKER U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT 9.60 15.6 1.03 1.27 1.29 3.13 (0.9 7

2-SISM ERROR 2.50 2 7 0.36 0. 17 0. 16 0.53

3

UNITS W g pCi/g

'pC i /g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g pCi /g ug/g

WLE ID 00472 FRACTIUi @ E S T CODE ASIRPT WE FaRn FC4l REPORTING DATA Date b Tire C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 7 / w Category 41615

P A R M X R

u-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-228 TH-234 u-235 TC-99 WTOTAL

RESUT

8.04 6.45 0.94 0.38 0.41 2.32 0.21 (0.9 (4

2SIW ERROII

2 45 1.53 0.37 0.10 0. 18 0.49 0. 14

UNITS

ug/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g p C i I g pCi /g u 9 4

35

451 Page 2 ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORT Wort Order # 9-02-142 Received : 02/23/90 Results b y Saople

S A N U ID 00468 FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT NAI%: FmH FOR REPOIITING DATA Date b Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 7 / w Categorg 41615

PMAnmR

U-TOTAL PE-210 K-40 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RWT

7.21 1.08 15.2 1.46 1.39 1.01 264 (0 .9 5

2-SIW ERROR

2.29 0.39 2 76 0.20 0. 18 0.22 0.51

3

WITS

W g p C i / g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g p C i / g p C i / g ug/g

WLE ID 00474 FRACTION OQA E S T CODE ASIRPT NA)IE FORH n# REPIRTING DATA Date b Time Collected 0 2 / 1 W Categorg 41615

U-TOTAL Pa-210 K-40 RA-224 Rh-226 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

9.51 1.19 9.54 0.33 0. bo 3.08 (0.9 (5.0

2-SIW ERROR UNITS

2 59 W g 0.38 pCi/g 1.68 p C i / g 0.09 p C i / g 0. 11 p C i / g 0. 50 p C i / g

p C i / g W g

36

451 Page 3 ITASL Oak Ridge REPORT Wort Order t 942-142 Received: 02/23/90 Results By Sample

WLE ID 00439

PARfMElER

I)-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

FRAcTIo# 0 2 Date & Tire Col

RESUT

9.95 15.7 0.98

0.94 0.62 3.09 io. 9 6

0. n

TEST C M E ASIRPT W FOAM FOR REPCRTINC DATA .lected 0 2 / 1 W Category 416U7

2-SIW ERRm

250 2 2 0.33 0. 13 0.12 0. 18 0.46

2

N I T S

w g pCi /g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g p C i / g pCi /g pCi /g w 9

WPLE ID 00444 FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT WE MRH FOR REPORTING DATA Date & Time Collected 02/17/90 Category 41607

PMlvIETER

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 lu-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESILT

7.80 5.49 1.05 0.63 0.70 1.72 io. 9 i4

2-S1WERR(M UNITS

2 26 U!/! 1.31 pCi/g 0.33 pCi /g 0.11 pCi /g 0.12 pCi /g 0.38 p C i / g

p C i / g w g

37

s I 1;

Page 4 ITRst Oak Ridge REPORT Wort Order I) 9-02-142 Received: 02/23/90 Results b y Sarple

WLE ID 00445 FRACTION 0 2 TEST CODE ASIRPT NAlQ FORH FOR REPOflTIM DATA Date b Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 7 / w Category 41w7

*-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-226 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT

8.69 11.8 0.96 0.40 2.69 (0.9 (4

2 - S I W ERRm UNITS

2.24 WY 1.8 p C i / g 0.35 pCi/g 0. w pCi/g 0.43 pCi /g

pCi/g UY/Y

WLE I D 00448 FRACTION @ EST CODE ASIRPT N A E FORH FOfl REPOIITING DATA Date b Time Collected 0 2 / 1 7 / w Category 41607

PARAnETol

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT

6.97 4.12 0.65 0. 18 1.59 a. 9 (4.0

2 - S I W ERROR WITS

1-89 UY/Y 1.06 pCi/g 0.26 pCi/g 0.07 p C i / g 0.34 p C i / g

p C i / g UY /!I

38

P a g e 5 ITRS Oak R i d g e REPORT Wort O r d e r # SO-02-142 R e c e i v e d : 02/23/90 R e s u l t s b y Sample

WLE ID 00400 FRACTIW 0 9 A TEST CODE ASIRPT NAK FORN FOR REPORTING DATA Date & T i a o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 6 / w Category 41adi

PARMETER

U-TOT1 K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

U-TUTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

R E S U T

13.9 21.0 1.49 1.08 1.21 0.94 3.33 (0.9 6

R E S U T

9.46 11.5 1.05 0.81 2 31 (0.9 a. 0

2-SIW ERROR

3.3 2 9 0.43 0. 16 0.15 0.22 0.53

4

UNITS

ug/g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / y p C i / g p C i / g ug/g

FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT NAlQ FORN FOR REPORTING DATA D a t e t T i r e C o l l e c t e d 02AblW- C a t e g o r g 41m

W E I D 0 0 4 0 3 \

i

I t E

2-sIW ERROR UNITS

2 6 4 u g / g 2 3 p C i / g 0.36 p C i / g 0.13 ' p C i / g 0.46 p C i / g

p C i / g ug/g

39

451 Page b ITRSL O a k Ridge REPORT Work Order ISO-02-142 Received: 02/23/90 Results b y Sample 1 WLEID00407 FRKTIM TEST CODE ASIRPT W E FORI! FOR REPORTING DATA

Date & Tire Collected M / l W Category 4 fwi

1 PAR4tf€IER

U-TOTAL cs-137 RU-106 K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226

P RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

I D ?

WLE ID 00410

i I: m I 8 1 I

u-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESULT

12 25 (0.2 (1.0 6.43 0.93 0.45 0.36 0.57 3.24 (0 .9 4

2-SIW ERRIN UNITS

2 45

1.24 0.29 0.09 0.08 0. 16 0.43

3

W! p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g pCi /g p C i / g pC i /g

p C i / g pC i /g

pci /g

ug/g

FRACTION TESF COOE ASIRPT NcvlE FORH FOR REPORTING DATA Date b Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 6 1 w Category 41601

RESUT

6.92 5.95 0.65 0.22 2 11 (0.9 8

2-!3WERRllR UNITS

1.82 u!/g 1. 10 pCi /g 0.28 p C i / g 0.06 p C i / g 0.34 p C i / 9

p C i / g 3 ug /g

ITRSL Oak R i d g e RWIRT Wort O r d e r t W-02-142 R e s u l t s b y Sample


4 WE I D 00414 FRACTION TEST CDDE ASIRPT NAIlE FORH FOR REPORTING DATA D a t e b Time C o l l e c t e d @ / 1 W C a t e g o r y 4 1 u

PARMETER

s I 1( B 1

U-TOTAL K-40 PI-210 RA-224 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

U-TOTAL K-40 PI-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESULT

27. 1 34.9 3.47 2.31 2. 12 8.96 (0.9 4

X I M A E R R O R UNITS

7.61 ug/9 7.18 pCi /g 1.69 BCi/g 0.51 pCi/g 0.68 pCi/g 1.75 pCi /g

gCi/g 2 W!

FRACTION 14 TEST CODE PSIRPT NM FMlH FM REPORTING DATA D a t e b T i i T C o l l e c t e d @/lb/w C a t e g o r y 41a3

RESULT

9.70 14.4 1.04 0.718 0.785 0.465 2 41 (0.9 7

2SIW ERROR

246 209 0.36 0.121 0.104 0.156 0.105

3

UNITS

ug/g pCi /g pCi /g pCi/g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g ug/g

45 1-

41

ITRRSL Oat Ridge REPORT Wort Order 4 M2-142 Results b q Sample

Page 8 Received : 02/23/90

FRACTION Tm CODE ASIRPT WE FORM FOR REPORTIN DATA Date & Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 6 1 w Category 4iw3 4 SAWLEIDO0420

PARAFBTER RESllLT 2-SIW ERROR NITS

1 c II

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 CS-137 RU-106 TC-99 TH-TOTbL

18.14 26.59 2 67 1. 19 1.69 h 45 (0.31 (2.2 (0.9 (4.0

5.61 W g 5.45 pCi/g 1.30 p C i / g 0.34 pCi /g 0.34 pCi/g 1.35 p C i / g

pCi /g p C i / g pCi /g u9/4

FRACTION TEST CMH ASIRPT NAE FORH FOR REPORTING DATA Date I Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 6 / w Category 4rw3

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 Ttl-234 CS-137 RU-106 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT

8.43 11.61 1.0 0.55 0. bo 252 (0.2 (1.0 (0.9 2

2-SIW ERROa

2.15 1.76 0.36 0. 10 0.09 0.39

1

UNITS

ug/g pCi /g p C i / g pCi/g pCi /g p C i / g p C i / g pCi /g p C i / g ug'g

'4 2

451, ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORT

Results b9 Sample I' Page

Received : 02/23/90

FRAcTIONl7J TESTCOW Date & Tire Collected 024

0 WLE ID 00426

Work &der I M 2 - 1 4 2

SIRPT NAE mRH FCR REPORTING DATA 7Vi.l- Category 41605

P M r n RESUT 2-SIW ERADR WITS

U-TOTAL 6.88 2 14 ug/g C I i 8 1

I I I I E i 1 P

K-40 16-14 285 pCiIg PE-210 0. m 0.33 pCi/g RA-224 0.93 0. 14 pCiIg R A - m 0.71 0.19 pCi/g lH-234 1.73 0.38 pCiIg CS-137 0.05 0.04 pCi/g TC-w (0.9 pCi/g TH-TOTAL 6 3 WY

i FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT ME mn FOR REPORTING DATA Date L Tiw Collected 02 /16 /90 Category 41605

U-TOTAL K-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 M-234 TC-w TH-TOTAL

11.14 14.95 1.22 0.77 0.89 0.68 2BQ (0.9 7

2-5IW ERROR

273 2 18 0.40 0. 13 0. 12 0.18 0.44

3

UNITS

w 9 pCi/g pCi/g pCiIg pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g U P 4

43

Page 10 ITRSL O a k Ridge REPORT Work Order # 9-02-142 Received: 02/23/90 Results bg Sarple

I FRACTION TEST COOE ASIRPT WE FORH FOR REPUITItJS DATA Date & Time Collected 02/lblW- Category 41605

8 SiVlPLEID00432

PARMETER RESAT 2SIWERROR UNITS I U-TOTAL K-40 RA-224 114-226 RA-228 TH-234 PB-210 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

9. 19 16.60 0.90 0.92 0.76 2 12 1-30 (0.9 6 .

252 3.03 0.1s 0.14 0.22 0.44 0.42

3

WY pCiIg p C i / g pCi /g p C i / g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g W g

I' FRACTION a TEST CDDE ASIRPT N##E F(3AI FIX REPORTING DATA Date & Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 6 1 w Category 41605

1 WLE ID 00435

U-TOTAL K-40 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 PB-210 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT

5.92 4.67 0.22 0.41 2a2 0.63 (0.9 (3

2-sIWERRIlR UNITS

1.60 ug/g 0.92 pCi /g 0.06 p C i / g 0.07 pCi /g 0.32 p C i / g 0.24 pCi/g

p C i / g ug/9

45.l

4 4

E 451

REPORT Work Order # 5062-142 ITRSL Oat Ridge R e s u l t s b y Sample


FRACTION 2 3 TEST CDDE ASIRPT NNE FORH FOR REPORTING DATA D a t e b Time C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 8 1 w Categor9 42i51B 1 !%"LE ID00505

U-TOTAL K-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 TC-99 WTOTAL

PhRAltETER

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESULT

9.22 13.95 1. 18 0.73 0.07

277 (0.9 (4

0. n

RESUT

9.72 13.12 0.94 0.79 0.92 2 18 (0.9 4

2-SIMA ERm

B I 1

I I I I. I

FRACTION 22A TEST CODE ASIRPT NME FOR! FOR REPORTING DATA D a t e & T i a a l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 B / w Category 4161B

# WLE ID00507

2 31 2.07 0.34 0. 12 0.11 0.19 0.43

UNITS

UP/! pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g gCi /g U!/9

2-sIW ERROR UNITS

2 71 ug/g 252 pC i /g 0.34 pCi /g 0.13 pCi /g 0. 13 pCi /q 0.45 p C i f q

pCi /g 2 W!

45

451 ITRSC O a k Ridge REWRT Work Order t W 2 - 1 4 2

Received : 02/23/90 Results b 9 *le

FRACTION TE!3 CODE ASIRPT NAE FMlH FOR REPOATIMG DATA Date & Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 8 1 w Category 41613

1 WLE I D 00510

P M m RESKT 2 -S IW ERROR UNITS

U-TOTAL 8. 19 2 19 Wg K-40 10.00 1.58 pCi/g PB-210 0.93 0.32 pCi/y RA-224 0.52 0. 10 p C i / g TH-234 256 0.41 p C i / g TC-99 (0.9 pCi/g TH-TOTAL 3 1 W!

I

FRACTION a TEST CODE ASIRPT WE FCRN FClR REPCATIK DATA Date & Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 W

8 - ID Oo513 Category 41613

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

R E S A T

7.46 7.96 0. m 0.393 0.501 1.75 (0.9 4

2-SIW ERROR WITS

1.91 w4 1.28 pCi/g 0.263 p C i / g 0.074 pCi/g 0.760 p C i / g 0.308 pCi/g

pCi/g 3 ug/i

46

451 ITRSL Oat Ridge REPORT Wort Order P W 2 - 1 4 2

R e s u l t s b y Saaple Page 13 Received: 02/23/90 8 WLE I D 00491 FRACTION 2 2 TEST COD€ ASIRPT NhE FORR FOR REWRTIR DATA

Date & T i r e C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 8 7 w Category 41617

B 3 I I

PARMWER

U-TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-220 TH-234 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT

11. a 19.6 1.67 1.26 1.19 1.14 2 65 (0.9 7

2-SIW ERROR

3 .7 3 .7 0. 54 0.21 0. 19 0.30 0.61

3

UNITS

W g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g pCi/g pCi /g pCi/g pCi /g ug/g

I ID 00494 FRACTION a TEST COW ASIRPT NA# FORM FOR REPORTING DATA Date b T i r e C o l l e c t e d 0 2 / 1 8 / w Category 41617

*TOTAL K-40 PB-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 CS-137 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESAT

15.6 15.6 1.84 0.876 0.951 0.965 3.39 2 57 (0.9 6

2-SICtlAERROR UNITS

3.7 26 0.60 0.181 0.161 0.300 0.64 0.33

3

ug/9 pCi/g pCi/g pCi /g pCi /g pCi /g pCi/g pCi/g pCi/g w 9

47

Page 14 ITRSL Oak Ridge REPORT Work Order P W2-142 Received: 02/23/90 Results b y Sarple

WE ID 00498 FRACTION TEST CODE ASIRPT WE FORH FIN REPORTING DATA Date t Tire Collected 0 2 / 1 m Category 41617

PARAnmR

U-TOTAL K-40 PE-210 RA-224 RA-226 RA-228 TH-234 CS-137 TC-99 W-TOTAL

RESUT

6.27 15.6 1.84 0.876 0.951 0.965 3.99 2 57 (0.9 8

2-SISM ERROR

2 1 2 6 0. bo 0.181 0.162 0.299 0.64 0.33

3

UNITS

w g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g pCi /g p C i / g pCi /g p C i / g pC i /g w 9

WLE ID 00501 FRACTION a TEST CODE ASIRPT NAlQ FORH FOR REPORTING DATA \ Date & Tire Collected @/187w- Categorg 41617

U-TOTAL K-40 PE-210 R4-224 RA-228 TH-234 CS-137 TC-99 TH-TOTAL

RESUT

8.37 12 80 1.01 0.51 0.50 2 49 0. 14 (0.9 3

2-SIW ERROR

2.32 1.91 0.33 0.10 0. 15 0.41 0.06

1

WITS

ug/g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g p C i / g u9/9

48

45?

ATTACHMENT I1

Boring Logs of the Sampling Done Along the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

49

RVFS I 1 8

I 1 R I 1 I I

q .3 i .% 1 I I I 8

8 I

e

I U I I I

I 1

8 I I

3.3 I b l

60 7 7

60 0 -i

-4 ,

I

VISUAL CUSSIFICATION OF SOILS " 8

8 n

SAA ma

e i i

8 i

i I

-I IYOk ! -c

I I I

SAA

I I

1 I Z U

I 1 I

8 1

Y

55

F E R N A L D R U F S

v I I I 5.0 1 i

. . i

-

I I

i 3 4 A

SAA I

I I I 8 1 i I I I

I I L

i 3.5 'I:

- ...

i

I /

58

I I I

. '. . , . I _ . . . . . . * ... .. : i i .

. . . r GI; ; ::. f - : . . . - . ' i ' - ' . '2 -C' , VlSUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL&

i=- 3klq G

t ' I I I I I I I

I I

F E R N A L D Rl/FS

2 .c i; I . - Awe &'at

O F L

---_I

I: I I I

I- .u .- Rl/FS

I

._ -- .-.-_ - VlSUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS' --'

L -1

3.5-

4 .O

4.5- I 5 A A

I I I I I I

I- 7-c t

I I I

NOTES

I I I

1 I

Vl SUAL CUSSlFl CATION O f

i 3.5-

f =

9. T

1 5.7' 1

5

5 A A

'-I 0

N R

N R

.-

41 % A

I 4

141 5 A A

-1

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

ATTACHMENT Ill

Chain of Custody Forms for the Sampling Done Along the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

64

I' r-.

.. x m .. x m

-6 a, > a 0 a a

.- I I I I

cj

t

65

0 Z ..

x

U a 1 u)

3 U C

a a: cj

m

.-

.- -

.. L?i U a > a 0 a

. .-

a

.. x 13 U

a 0 a a:

.- !2

L!.

n a 0 0 W a > n 0 bi 3 0 4 0 t a I 0

.. x

'0 Q) > a 0 a LT

n

.-

.. %

U

a 0 Q) U

m

.- !!2

d

451

. .

S I .. m x m

.- 67 a 0 a [r

151

0

0 z -I 4 m > . : a: w a a a 0

Z 0 I= a Z F v, w 0 m U -1

0 a W

.. rn

(0 N m

E

I a - e m v,

.. x

-0 a, > a, 0 a

m

.-

(I

.. x U

a, 0 a (I

n

.- ?

L - v) C -

.. x m

.. x m

.. 2. m

01 a - a E .n

P

.. x m ..

2.

D a > a 0 a, n

m

.-

cj

71

n K 0 0 W a >- 0 0 ti 2 0 ti 0 2 a - I 0

.. rn '2 z

Q

a I - : Q v) a, n rn rn 0

- Q

- .-

.. >.

U a c rn 3 U C

a, (I

m

.-

.- -

i

.. %

U a, v)

3 U C

a, a: cj

m

.-

.- -

c

451

n K 0 0 w a ). n 0 F v) 3 0 0 4

t z I 0

0 Z J 1 m t : [I w [I

U 0

- a

W J a 5 2 c ~ a a c n

.. x m .. >

m

.. >. m

n K 0 0 W K * 0 0

3 0 0

Li 4

t a I 0

x

74

0 z A m -1

> : a: w a: a: < 0

-5

in a: W m I I I U W I- W J

W

a I 2

.. 2.

U a c v)

3 W C

a

m

.-

.- - a d

.. x

-0 a > a 0 al a:

cn

.-

.. v) C 0 0 .- e

2 e v) C

m 0 Q) Q in

- - .-

t

E E I

0

451

.. >. rn

.. 2. rn

Z 0 F a z I- v) w 0

- .. x

U a > a 0 a [I

.-

-.' , I --

.. u) C 0

0 3

rn C

m 0 a cz v)

.- c.

L - - - .-

.. >. m

cj

n U 0 0 w U * 0

3 0 0

n

z 4

i z I 0

4\51

cj

453 . -

.

j; m T3

. a o Q) U

.- !?

.. x

-0 a c v)

3 U C

a

m

.-

.- - a: 4

n

a

.. m"

45!

0 z .. x m

.. x m

j; 13 -0 a,

.. x

-0 a > a u a,

m

.-

a:

> a 0 a

.-

[I

ci ct

.. fn

E B E I a, - m m a, a v) v) 0

- .-

n

n U 0 0 w a * P 0 l- ua 3 0 0 4

t a I 0

4 5?-

. l

t C

- > Z E s + L) ..

>. m .. x 13 D a > a V a a:

.-

% c\u c * 3 5. @.

"<

-.

- K 2

~

-- I d

a: w rn 5 3

5 Z I-

$ a

Y 0' LT a

Z 0 I= 6 Z + cn W

-

n

c

in 3 0 '

.. v)

E

.. x

U a, lz v)

3 U C

a, U

.d

m

.-

.- -

i

t-; \ c-

4 c c L

.. m U a, > a, 0 a, U

.-

-

x a

.. fn B m

85 .. x

73 a, > a,- 0 a, a:

m

.-

.. v)

Q N (0

a

E

I - E (0 v)

.. x .m U a r .v)

3 U C a

1-

.- - a: cj

.. x

U a c v)

3 U C Q) a: u

m

.-

.- -

.. x

U Q) > a 0 a

m

.-

(I

>I .. C . x m z . m Q) 8@! m .m

a E': > .- V a3 0) a:

451,

0 z c

.- E T :z u n c w o c C Q o a l :e E W Q

0 s5

0 0 :. .,'

.. x

U a S fn

3 D C

a

m

.-

.- - a cj

.. x

U a S fn 3 CT C

a [I

m

.-

.- -

i

.. >.

U a, I= fn 3 CY C

a

m

.-

.- - U

c\i

.. x

-u a > a 0 a

n

.-

a

.. >.

U a > a 0 a U

m

.-

m 4

cn [I W m 5 5 W

2 W I- W

a

-I a

v,

I a

I , .-

d -0 a > a 0 a

.-

oc

.. x

U Q) > a u a

m

.-

U

45!

ATTACHMENT IV

Subsurface Soil Sample Collection for the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

Gravel Pack Testing

89

B 451- I 1

I 4

a c. 0"

I

0 0 I

I c, W 7 -

UUO’ 3 1 L

a c. 2

C 0 -= Q,

zk 0

1

0 0 I

t3, 0 I

I -

I, 451

451- I I

I I I I I I 0

0 I

ob 9

451 r

i" f Q c. :

1 n >r

Y 0 a 6 9 ii a

1 - - . . - . , . .

- - . - - , . . ,

I 4 5r I I

Q)

a c n

45! I

0 J >..

I 0

1 . . -

0 0 I

1

d z

E

3 6 :. . . . . 0

451.

0 0 I .-

O r 0 D -

I c I

n I I I

V

1

451 I N T R O D U C T I O N

T h e s e r e c o m m e n d e d s o e c i f i c a t j o n s we1-e p r e p a r e d by t h e N a t i o n a l Associat ion of S e w e l . S e r v i c e Cornpar i res I " C A S S C 3 i I:> : e s p o n s e to r e q u e s t s from e n g i n e e r i n g f i r m s , . - t ~ n ~ c ~ p a l ~ r ~ e s . and ) ! n e ' . :;t 3 a r ' l z a : ?'.j concet .nec w i : h sewer' c o l l e c t i o n s y s t e r : v a I ~ % t e n a ~ c e and r e n a b t l ! t a t l ? r . . e c o m m e n c e a spec1 f l c a t i o n s a r e t n t e n d e u to a s s i s t e n s i n e e r s anc r i u n : c 1 3 3 : orC1c a j :o - - r o i ) e l ' i y s p e c l f y sewer rehabilitation w o r k and t h e r e o y obtain des ired Icnc j -Jas: i rs r e s u l t s .

.;ASSCO I n s p e c t o r H a n d b o o k s a r e a . ; a : ' a b l e a t 5 4 2 . 5 0 p e r c o p y p r e p a i d . . . 466 5 1 3 0 e 1 - Order i f i n v o i c i n 5 I S r e a u ~ r e a . D i . . ; c : .!?eludes t a x e s and shipping. OO.ae1- cv m a i i from 5 4 A S S C 0 , 101 b y m o r e R d . , j u : ! e 5 2 ' , A l l a n r o n t e , F L 3 2 7 1 4 .

I

411 s t a t e m e n t s a n d d a t a g i v e n net -e r ' d r e b e l i e v e d to be a c c u r a t e a n d r e l i a b l e but a1.e : ~ r e s e n ! e d w i t h o u t g u a r a n t y * a ' ' a - t y . o r r e s o o n s i b i l i t y o f a n y kind, e x p r e s s or- implied S t a t e m e n t s 31- suc;;es! 2nj . c o n c e r n i n g o o s s i b l e use o f p r o d u c t s or o r o c e d u r e s a r e made ~ 4 1 : h o u t r e p r e s e n t a t l o p o r w a r r a n t y t h a t a n y such u s e or o r x e d u r e i s f r e e o f p a t e n t i n f r i r - ~ e ~ e n t . T h e u s e r should not a s s u m e t h a t al s a f e t y m e a s u r e s a r e i n d i c a t e d o r tna! O t h e r m e a s u r e s m a y not b e r e q u i r e d .

103

1 2 . 1 1 F i n a l A c c e p t a n c e A f t e r i n s t a l l a t i o n o f t h e l i n e r , t h e C o n t r a c t o r s h a l l a t t h e o p t i o n o f t h e O w n e r ' s S e p r e s e n : a r l v e e i t h e r T V inspec t t h e s e w e r l l n e a s s p e c i f i e d o r p e r f o r m a t e s t o n t h e s e w e r l i n e as s p e c i f i e d b e l o w .

T e s t i n g : A f t e r I r \ s t a l l a t i o n a n d \3ei?re a n y s e r v i c e c o n n e c t i o n s a r e r e i n s t a t e d , t h e C o n t r a c t o r s h a l l run a t e s t o n t h e s e w e r line to d e t e r m i n e I f i t I S w a t e r t i g h t .

T h e C o n t r a c t o r s h a l l f u r n i s h a l l n e c e s s a r y e q u i p m e n t to c o n d u c t t h e t e s t . A n a c c e p t a b l e m e t h o d is a l o w - o r e s s u r e a i r t e s t , c o n d u c t e d as follows:

P v e s s u r i t e t h e t e s ! sect lo.? 1 0 4.: ::SI ana hola J b o v e 3 , 5 p s i f o r no1 l e s s i n a c 2 m l n u t e s , A d d a l p i f n e c e s s a r y :a k e e p t h e p r e s s u r e a b o v e 3 . 5 os i . A I t n e end o f t h i s 2 - r n i ~ u t e s t a b l l i z a t i o r ; ) e r i o d , n o t e t h e p r e s s u r e ( m u s t De 3 . 5 psi m l n i m u m ) a n d b e g i n t h e t imecf per-lod. I f t h e P r e s s u r e d r o p s 0 . 5 os1 r , e s s t h a n t h e t i m e g i v e n in t h e t a b l e Je low, t h e s e c t i o n of p i p e s h a l l h a v e ' a i l e d t h e t e s t .

W h e n t h e p r e v a i l i n g g r o u r , C ~ . a : e r 1s a b o v e t h e s e w e r being t e s t e a . t e s t o r e s s u r e s h a l l b e i n c r e a s e d 0 . 4 3 3 s : f o r e a c h foo t t h a t t h e w a t e r t a b l e I S a m v e t h e i n v e r t o f t h e s e w e r .

M i n i m u m T e s t T i m e S e w e r S i z e [ I n c h e s 1 ( M i n u t e s 1

U 6 8

10 1 2 1 5 1 8 2 1 2 4 2 7 30 36 4 2 48 54

2 3 4 5 6 7 - 1 1 2 9

1 0 - 1 / 2 1 2 1 3 - 1 / 2 15 18 2 1 2 4 2 7

! f t h e t i m e for t h e p r e s s u r e to drop 0 . 5 psi is 1 2 5 p e r c e n t o r l e s s o f the t i m e g i v e n in t h e t a b l e , t h e l i n e shai! I m m e d i a t e l y b e r e p r e s s u r i z e d to 3 . 5 psi a n d t h e t e s t r e p e a t e d . f building sewel 's h a v e oeen . . e n s t a t e d p e f o r e t h e a i r t e s t , t h e y s n a l l b e

c o n s i d e r e d p a r t o f t h e gipe to . \ . n . ~ + ~ t h e y a r e c o n n e c t e d a n d no a d j u s t m e n t o f t e s t t i m e s h a l l b e a l l o w e d .

T h e p r e s s u r e g a g e u s e d s h a l l be s u p p l i e d b y t h e C o n t r a c t o r a n d h a v e m l n l m u m d i v i s i o n s o f 0. 10 psi,

104

. .

-/a. ' . .

Oesignation: C 828 - 88 4m Standard Test Method for

I

LOW-PRESSURE AIR TEST OF VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE LINES'

1. sow 1.1 This tcst method definer procedures for

tcsting vi tnhd c l i y pipe Lines, using low-pressure air, ro demonstrate the structural intcgrity of the instalkd line.

1.2 This test method for testing shall k per- fornicd on liner anzr cnnnection laterals, if any, hsvc h e n plugged ana braced adequately to wirhrtand [he test pressure, and aRcr the rrenches have ken backfilled for a su[ficient time to gen- erate a significant portion of the ultimate trench l a d on the pijx line. The time between comple- riorr of the backfill operation and lowpressure eir testing shall be detrrmined by the approving authority.

1.3 This test rnethxl may dso be used as a preliminary test, which enables the instdler to dcmorlslnce the conairion of the line prior to backfill end funher constmrction acrivitia.

1.4 This tcst m e t h d is su;table for trsting grai.itpfl3w xwcr pipe constnisfcd of vitntied clay or combinations of clay and other pipe materials.

1.5 Definitions. C 896, is IO k uxd for clan- frcation oftcminobgy in this 1cst method,

I .6 In developing the metric conversions used in the standards under the juridiction of Com- rnit:ce Cd, rrcognition h u ken mode of the vanahit nafure ofclay, so that neither 'soft" nor 'hard- conversions. Y they are defined in Prac- tice E 380, have k c n made. For example, the inch is cansidercd IO k 25 mm instead of 25.4 rnm.

NOTE I-The vsluc) sated in inch.pound unit5 ere to bc regarded 51 the sLanJarJ.

1.7 This stondwd mcy lrtvolvc hu:nrchi.r ma. I z r i n b . opuariclnr. ond q v i i p m t : ! . This standard d ~ t y fl0t pidr!Wt 10 oddrc,cj 1111 ofdie f ( f&y prob- lems aswiai td u i l h irs USY. Ir Is (he re*sponribil- ily of ihe iisdr ofrhis slandard lo eslablish appro-

. 23

prlaie safiry and htpallh prcicrices and dctmnlnc Ik npplicabilily ofregularary llmitntionr prior IO use.

2. R e f e r r o d Document 2.1 A.CT.W Slondc7rd: C 12 Prscrice for Installing Vitrified Clay Pipz

C 896 Definitions of rems Relaring to Clay Lines'

Prducts7

3. Summary of Test hferhod 3.1 The section of \he line to be tested is

pluaed. Air, at low pressure, ij introduced into the p l u g e d line. The line passes the test if the ratc of air loss, a meuured by pressure drop, does no( exceed a specified amount in a specified the . This may determined by the use of Table I , ot calculated by use of the formulao in Appendix X I .

4. Safety Precaurlond 4. I The low-pressure air test may be danger-

ous to personnel if, thiough lack of understand- ing or carelessaeu, a b e & ovcrpressuritrd of plugs are installed irdproperly. It is extrcmcly imponant that the vafious plugs be installcd so LU to prevent the sudaen expulsion of a poorly installed or panially'inflatcd plug. AS an ex- emple of the hazard, a fclrcr of 250 Ibf ( I 112 N) is exerted on sn &in. (200-mm) plug by an internal pressure of 5 psi (34 kPa). Observe the following safely prcCautionr:

4.1.1 KO one shall be ollowed in the manholes during testing because of thc haards. --

I T h i s ten rr.eih+i i5 unda the jun'diction ot ~a Corn. mires C4 on Virridcd Clay Pip urd i s rhc Circst mplnsibrliry ofSuknmmirkcCDo,?O on Mctb& ofTet and Sptdcatiuns.

Current cditiun r p p m v y bz. 26, 1986. Published Nuvcm- tcr IOU& Oridnrlly pubit$thcd u C828-757. Lpn prrviow edition C $21 -10.

Annual Bc@k 0/.4sThi $l&ndardJ. vd M.os,

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 I

\ !

4.1.2 Install all plugs SeCUrely. 4.1.3 When linea are to be tested, it may be

nrccssary that the plugs k braced as an added safety fator.

5. Preparation of the t h e 5 . I Air may pass through the wolls o f d q pipe.

This can be ovcrcome,by wetting the p i p . Usu- ally, moisture absorbed from the backfill is suf- fic.ien1 to cnpe with this situation. If the problcrn pcrqictq, scgrncn tal icsting of the linc udl establish i f thcre is a signilkant leak.

.5.1 A wetted interior pipe surface Li dtsi r i - ole and will produce more consistent lest re- sutts. Where pratical, clean the line prior to testing to wet the pipe surface and eliminate debris.

6. Procedure 6.1 Determine the ktst time for the section

of line to be. tested using Table 1 or X I or the formulas in Appendir X I .

4.1.4 Do nor overpresscrize the lincs.

6.2 Plug all openings in the test section. 6.3 Add air until the hternal presstire of the

line is raised to approximately 4.0 psi (28 kPa). After {his prescure is reached, allow the pres. sure to stabilize. The presxure will normally drop as the air temperature stabilizes. This

. . . -. .

c 828

usually takes 2 to 5 mini depending on the pipe size. The pressure may be reduced to 3.5 psi (24 kPa) bcfore stsning the test.

6.4 When the pressure has stihilized and is at Of above the srar71ng test pressure of 3.5 psi (24 kPa), start the test. If the pressure drops more than 1.0 psi (7 kPa) during the test time, the line is presumed to'.have failed the test. If an 1.0-psi drop docs not occur within the test time, the lint has passed the lest.

N o n 2-Ground waier above the pipe will re- duce air 10%. IC *e %:ion of line under test shows sipillcant infiltration, the agency may require sn Lnfiltrrtion rest. Refer io 11.2 of Recommended PTX- lice C 12. 7. Test Time

7.1 TabIe I shows the required test time, T, In minnutes/100 ft of pipe for each nominal pipe size. Test rimes arc for an 1.0-psi (7-kPa) pressure drop from 3.5 to 2.5 psi (24 to 17 kPa). Table I has been establishrd using the formulas contained in the appendix.

7.2 If the section of li,nc to be tested includes more than one pipe size, calculate the lest time for each site and add the tat times to arrive a i the total test time for the section,

7 . 3 It is not occ.cssary to hold the test for the whole period when it b clearly evident that the rate of sir loss b less than the allowable.

TABLE I Mlnlmum fa1 T h e for Vafloln P(pe Skcs

Nominal T(tLnc), Numinrl f(drnc). Pipe Sire. in. min/100 R Piw Sire. In. mln/100 n

3 0 1 21 30 4 0 ) 24 3 6 6 0.7 ' 27 4 1 a 1 .L 30 4.6

I O I .5 33 5 4 I2 1.8 36 6.0 I5 2.1 39 6.6 Ld 2.4 42 r

APPENDIX

(h'onmandatory Informndon)

-2 . : ; . -..-.* :.* :. ,. ::.,..

../) ..:.'.. ........... . .a. .

. . . ..... . . . . _ . . .

Xt. FOR3IIILAS AYID ALLo\vA8LE AIR LOSS STANDARDS USED IN TEST METIIOD C83 I I XI.1 Calculate the required test time at I given LYL

Q - K X - T rllcwrble air IOU a follows:

X1.3 SJmbulx o.'L Q T - K X -

. . . . i

I

1

E

.. .-

.A ,

.-

. . . .. . .. .. . . .

A' - 0.334 x IO-' for SI. uniU, L - fcngfh of line of onc pipe s i x , R (fl)), Q - air IOU. A'/min (m'/nis), and r - tlnlc rsr prcsqirc to drnp 1.0 2si (7 kh), min.

feet per minute, has been established for each nomi- n i l pi die. Based on field expcricnce, the Q s that h a w C e n selected will cnabk detection o f any rig: nificant leak. Table XI lists the Q &tabfished for each p i p sire. X l . 4 An appropriate ; I ! l j u d b k a i r !os% Q. in cubic

X2. APPLICAT1ON OF TF$T METHOD C828

XZ. 1 In order to demonr1r3te the technique of a p plying this test method, the example in X2.2 has k c n prepared. It utitiza nriaus pipe titq Icnphr, and conditions that may k encounkrd in the field. fhc cwnplc hu been daigned to illustrate the use offabte I and the formula$.

x2 2 E . n J M F k - - A n Instal!alion bas been made that consic3 of line I: 300 fI (91.4 m) of I5.h. (375- mm) vitrified clav pipe with no laterals, and line 2: I reach of 350 fl(1b.P m) of 8 4 . (2lW.nrm) ofvivified clay pi to which arc attached 120 !I (36.6 rn) of 4 h. ( I J m r n ) laterals ofvitrificd cloy p i p .

X2.2.1 Prubkm-What arc the a propnate t e n times to use in order to demonstrate k e integrity of thc installed liner?

X2 3 S o l d o n 6 X2.3.1 What is the appropriate test lime, r, for

line I? X 2 J . l . l Use Table I , find time, 7 - 2. I mid100 n (10.5 m), for IJ-in. (33-mm) pipe. '

2.1 7;, - 300 x - - 6.3 rnin io0

X2.3.2 W h a t Is rppropriate tlmc for line 2? %2.3,2. l SoMan-Ux Trble 1.

0.3 T, - 120 x - - 0.4 rnin Tote! test time 4.6 min

X2.3.3 If further analysis is desired, the followin8 cxzmple ic provided:

X2.3.3.1 If in the test ofline.1, the I.O-psi (7.kPa) pressure drop occurs in 3.3 min instead of 6.3 min, what is the rate of air loo?

'oo -

LYL Q * K x - 1 ' ;

where: 1s' x 300

1.3 This exceeds the 4 n'/rnin allowed in Table XI.

X2.3.3.2 What runher coiirscs of action might bd wnridered in rcsoiving this CXC~LI r6te of air IOU?

( I ) Segmentally tci: the line aqd ccmparc the time-sir 10s valuer In each segmenr.

(2) If the values in each segment !re comparsble. the air-lou rohlem ma be dirtribyted throubhou!

(3) If the valuer in each agment'rre significantly diflercnt, each Jegmtnt may be cvaluattd rnd hnhtr analysis k madc in order to deterdine the loution or any significant air IOSSO.

Q - 0.0011371 x - - 7;6 n'/min.

the line, an a funhcr m&ii should,bo made.

l

2s 107 . .. i . ..! .. ._ . . . . ......

L . . . .. . . . .

108 c

* -J 7

. I . c

p.. L, .u- I / '

ATTACHMENT VI

Data from the Pneumatic Testing of the FMPC Outfall Pipeline

110

451

FMPC Outfall Line Air-Test

Report

Sewer Line ComDosition: 16" Diameter Ductile Iron Pipe (AWWA standard centrifugal cast iron pipe, bell and spigot fittings, class

160, Fed. STD WW-P-421)

Manhole Composition: Concrete (various sizes) With gunite rehabilitative coating

111

E 4 1

AMERICAS TEST & SEAL AIR-TEST FORM

F\.lPC OUT FALL PIPELINE 45P

A H h .\SSCO guidelines and specifications are to be followed explicitly throughout the test.

Test Dare: 6\16/90 Line Segment So. 1 Test No.: 7

\laailhole No. : 1 7 5 To Manhole No. : 176

Pipe Size: wi Pipe Composition: Ductile ~ r o n

Length of Line Segmenr: 5 2 8 . 0 3 ft.

Tnst 6. Test Time: 8 rr.inure5

1 . I'xhsure @ S:;!rt: 3 . P: t , s i ! r e @ 1 C.:_!?C of ? e s t Time (8 mnures ) 9 . Elnpsc'd Time Yar 0.5 PSI Pressure Drop: r n w (If Test Failed)

3 . 8 FSI (Same as No. 4. above) - 3 . 4 PSI

(If Test Passed) 3 . 3 p g !E

:O. Pr tssure @ 125%- or Test Time (10 minutes):

Segment S t a b - : PASSED

So te/Commen t S: The necessity to test this line s3crnent 3 times was due to the fact that the dead-end plug would not seat properly. This was caused bv excess gunite sgrayed into line durinq manhole rehabilitation. After insertation of a different type plug (Sealco) the test could be conducted The --- results of this test are noted above and provides the documentation that virtually no exfiltration exists in this segment.

--

-

in records of Theta Technologies. A s \$'it nessed B! Actual signed copies 112

Hu-ev (Theta) William Mayer ( A T S )

1F I I

AVERICAN TEST & SEAL

FUPC OUT FALL PIPELINE AIR-TEST FORM 45r;

All S,\SSCO guide!ines and specifications are to be followed explicitly throughout the tesr.

Test Date: 6 / 1 6 / 9 0 Line Segment So 2 Test No.: 4

Manhole No . 1 7 6 To Clanhole No. : 177

Pipe Size. 16" P!:e Composition: I>uctile Iron

Length of Line S e g e r . : - c 1 . 1 2 Et.

Test 6 . Test Time: 8 r r . : x t e s

P:.ehsure @ S:tirI: 3 . 7 PSI LSame as No. 4. above) 8. P . - e w r e @ 100% of Test Time (8 minutes) 9. E!apsed Time for 0 5 PSI Pressure Drop:

PSI m w (If Test Failed)

3 . 2 a

Segm t tnt Stam. . PASSED

Y oteiC 0 m rnent5. __- To facilitate proper - __- --. stabilization within this line seqment .6 ?SI was added. in the line made it necessary to re-set the plugs 4 tines. gssary to dislodqe some of the qunite before ProDer s e a t i n a d be facilitated. --- merit Dassed that a retest needed to be undertaken for verification.

Difficulty with the seating of test pluqs due to gunite residue It was nec-

The results of this test Drovided that even thouah line sec See

113 paye,,note te t Y o . 5 verification.

Actual signed copies in records of Theta Technologies. Gordon J. Brown Jr. ('CFICCI) William Humphrey (Theta)

Eobert Yyers (Theta) - L!illiam E. Maver (ATS)

.As N itnessed b)

---

A M E R I C A S TEST & SEAL

FMPC OUT FALL PIPELINE AIR-TEST FORM 451

All M S S C O guidelines a n d specifications are to be foUowed explicitly throughout the test.

Test Date: 6 /16 /90 Line Segment So. 2 Test No,: 5 verification Manhole Yo i 7 6 To Manhole No. : 1 7 7

Pipe Size: 1 6 " Pire Composition: Ductile Iron Length of Line Segmen;: 2 2 7 . 1 5 ft.

Stabilization 1 . Stabilization Time: 2 mimites 2 . Lcngth ot' 'I'im;, to Pressur ize Scpreiit(inirial1y): 10 sec 3. Pressure @, Ccmpressor Shutdown: 4 - 2 PSI 4 . P:.essure A t'ter St;\bilization Pericd: PSI 5. ,AII. .Added Dei:-ing Sta5ilitation?

minutes

3 . 8

N (YN) If yes, explain below.

Tfst 6. Test Time: 8 minutes

1 . Pressure @ Start: 3 . 8 8 . Piehscire @ lCO% of Test Time (8 mnures) 9. E ,ipsed Tize for 0.5 PSI Pressare Drop:.-- (If Test Fa

PSI (Same as No. 4. above) 3 . 3 PSI

led) er

IO. Pressure @ 1 2 5 % of Test Time (10 minutes): 3 * * PSI (U Test Passed)

Segment Status. . PASSED

rema in ing 't. a w r i v had ? P S T -- It only took 10 sec. to Dresslyize l ine A S 1 -

from previous test. No air was added to facilitate stabilization du ring this verification test. The results provided by this re-test verifv that the line segment is stable and document that virtually no ex- filtration exists.

.As C t itnessed B!.

K ole; Cu m menu:

-- ---

114 Actual signed copies in records of Theta Technologies.

Gordon J. Brown Jr. (FIMCO) Robert Myers (Theta) --

.-

AMERICAS TEST & SEAL

FMPC OUT FALL PIPELINE AIR-TEST FORM

4512

All S XSSCO guidelines and specifications are to be followed explicitly throughout the test.

Test Date: 6 /16/90 Line Segment bc . 3 Test No.: 1

Manhcle No. : 1 7 7 To Manhole No. : 1 7 9 Pipe Size: 16" Pipe Composition: Ductile Iron I-engr!: of L,i!ie S<;;nienr: 2 5 4 . 8 2 ft. ---

Test 6, Ttlsi Time: 3 ~T.;z \ ; !~s

3 . Psejsure @ 100% of Test Time (8 minutes) 3 . 2 P ' e b s u r e @ St.!rr:- 3 . 5 --- PSI (Same as No. 4. above)

9 . Elapsed Time for 0.5 PSI Pressgre Drop: PSI (If Test Failed)

Segm e n t S t a t u : ?ASSED

\ ote/Co mmen tS: No significant plug insertion -- difficulties -.- were noted in this line segment. Gunite residue was still present in the line but did not inhibit the test. The results of this test are noted above and Dro- vides the documentation that virtually no ex-filtration exists in this

d segment. In manhole No. 1 7 8 on the downstream side a leak was note at the top o f pipe on wall.

Actual signed copies in records Of Theta Technologies-

--_.__-- ---- ---- -- - ------

As 11 itnessed B! 115

Gordon J. Brown Jr. (WMCO) William Humphrey (Theta) Robert Myers (Theta) William E. Maver (ATSI --

AVERICAN TEST & SEAL

FMPC OUT FALL PIPELINE AIR-TEST FORM

~ l i h .\SsCO guideiines a n d specificarions are to be followed explicitly throughout the t es t .

Test Date: 6 /16 /90 Line Segment So. 4 Test No.: 2 Manhole N o . . 1'8 To Manhole No. : 179 Pipe Size: 16" Pipe Composition: Ductile Iron L e n g h of Line Se,. c ve: : : . 530.00 ft.

Test 6. Tesr Time: 8 rr.!nureS T P:.e.\sure @ Srarr: 3 - 6 8. Prehsure @ lGO% of Test 'Time (8 nxnutes) 9. E.apsed Time for 0 5 PSI Pressure Drop: minutes (If Test Failed)

PSI LSame as No. 4. above) 3 - 3 PSI

a m e n t Status : P A S S E D

\ o t e/C 0 m men tS* It was necessary to test this li-ne segment 7 tines b e c w t- had to be re-set due to the gunite residue in line. A f t e r r p - insertion the test could be conducted and a conclusion achieved. Tb e

umen ta tion, results of this test are noted above and provid9s t he d m

that virtually no ex-filtration exists in t h ~ ~ ' seament.

______ __-_---- - ------ ----- --

---

A S P% itnessed B! Actual signed copies in records of Theta Technologies.

116

on J. Brown ( W M C O )

Robert Myers (Theta) ----

William Humphrey (Theta) William E. Mayer (ATS)

E 1

II I

,AJIERICAS TEST & SEAL

FMPC OUT FALL PIPELINE ,AIR-TEST FORM

explicitly throughout

Test Date: 4 /28 /90 Lme Segment S o . 5 Test No.: 1 hlanhole ho 1 t a To VaLbole No. : 180

Pi?e S a 1 6 " P I Z ~ Composition: Ductile Iron 2 7 8 . 5 9 f t . Lengtk of L r e Ss,mer* --

Test

merit S t u ; FAILED

\ o t c . c ' u r n m e n u D u r i n g the erev could not be pr re-test was a t t

n o t exceed 3.1 iegment is s l ~ s c

_____--- ..-

--- - --

- --- ___ -_-.-

A S Witnessed B:

lous test conducted o n A i l 28th t.h1

ossurized to the desianated NASSCO sDecif1catiW.S. empted but the same results were w e d .

d u r i n q b o t h pressurization attemDs, u s l J n ~ ecc- to its stability a n d ex-filtrationis ve

line seument ____-._.-- -- - A

L ~ P w n n l d

ry likely. -

-.- -

117

. . .. ' . . . _ . . ' ;.

I 5 I

.A\IERICA\ TEST & SEAL AIR-TEST FORM

FVPC OUT FALL PIPELINE

Stabi l izat ion

Test

Pa (If Test Passed) 3 . 7 u

:O . Pxss i i r e @ K 5 % of Test Time (l@ nmutes):

I Q 1 J I

\ O [ C : C ' v ni men Is - D d n a t h e P r e ! ! was pressurized c,otal of 27 m i n

c o u l d be noted. 8 ninutes. The

documentation t

A S \+ i t nesseci B!

--- -- ---- _-------

- _-_-

seam?& Throughout a

dror,

i o u s Z P s t c a n d u ( - d = bnril 9m t h i s l i n 0

to 4 PSI and stabilized to 3.7 PSI. utes the line seqment - held at 3.7 PSI tm no

This_ time period far e x - p d p d NASQp* auldellnPs of e results of this test are noted above a n d i d o n *h

hat virtually no ex-filtration exists in this segment.

11'8

I s I

1 8 1 N 1

.j

II

AMERICAK TEST & 'SEAL

FMPC OUT FALL PIPELINE AIR-TEST FORM ' 451

All LASSCO guidelines and specifications are to be followed explicitly throughout the test.

Test Date: 4/28/90 Line Segment So. Manhole No , : 1 8 : To Manhole No. : River Out-fall point Pipe Size: 16" Pipe Composition: Cast Iron

Length of Line Segment: ! 1 6 C . 9 5 ft.

Test No.: 1 -

&bil iuthn 1. Stabilization Time: 2 minutes 2. Length of Time to Pressurize Segmenr(initial1y): minutes 3. Pressure @ Compressor Shutdown: PSI 4. P re 5 su rt' A t t e r S til bi I i zit t i 011 Pe riod : PSI 5. A i r Addzd During Stabilization? (Y/N) If yes, explain below.

Test 6. Test Time: 8 r m u t e l - I . Pressure @ Stiirt : 8. Pr-essure @ 100% of Test Time (8 minutes),: 9. Eiapsed Time for 0.5 PSI Pressure D r o p : - (If Test Failed)

PSI LSame as No. 4. above)

QL 10. Pressure @ 125% of Test Time (10 minutes):-/ (If Test Passed)

Spgment S t w ; NOT TESTED -

-.I

r 3n April 28th nc test could be conducted on th is seament as the d i u

11 R i . & l a could not locate the end of the outfiLll 1- The ?rntprtlVe

whick protruded twenty five feet into the Great Mi& River - a l l o w for the end of the l h ~ to re- __- placement of a oluq to facilitate the test. The

v a s determined to be Suried .under the ''Rip Rap''.

>ote/CommentS: --

di'd not cluded w - exposed. This Dre

1 of the outfall -

.As Witnessed B y $11 9

P

ine

45s IC

IC IC 111

I ? I I!

Section 11

Equipment Utilized &

Personnel

120

I

4 5r

Eau imen t Utilized

Seal Co Inc. Air Testing Equipment

Meter & Gauges

American Logiball Inc. Sewer Plugs 9 to 16 in.

Test & Dead End

Sealco Inc. Sewer Plug 15 to 18 in.

Test Plug

Sealco Inc. Sewer Plug 15 to 18 in.

Dead End Plug

Misc. Support Equipment

Personnel

Bill Mayer - Vice President of Operations Randall Turner - Field Superintendent

Arnold Huber - Field Technician James Meadows - Field Laborer

John Jentgen - Diver John Barker - Tender

121

IC 451- li 8 I D

Section 111

Confined Space Entry Permits

122

* .- 1 9 G % 45? Work Permit Number:

, OXYGEN CONTENT - W E 4EADINGS ~ C O O V io Be attcnea)

mO_.j-,: 33/ 0% I 1 : R A i

TOXICITY COMBUSTIBLE GAS TIME 1 READINGS TIME I AEADlhGS

-.&Q>f O"/ 3 OfoCf3 .0 - C o I Wflo. 0 -MA SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS I

ITEM IYEP NO1

I I I I PRECAUTIONS TAKENINEEDED Y E S , NO ]DNA

1. ;mea ventilaiion required I

2 Work requires staglng or ladder 3 Ground Fault Interupring protection required 7- iaequate/proper illumination required - 9- -. -

3. LOCk B Tag Procedures required and followed 4. Water in soace has been collectea ana samoled 5. Compie!e isolation of Drocess lines to2!2ceJas been cornoletea

J ! 1

d .

:TIME:

.IC1

I.

I (,J $ ' I . ' I 'CTION 0 - PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT REOUIRED __ 3 YES N b SPECIFY

I W.I .6. Ail mecnanical G z o m e n i to :ne soace 'lave oeen !aggeC dscot-nected ana'or blockea --____- ..-. . ..

SECTION F CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT Ivaf lo lornomorsrnan ! 2 i o u r s ATMOSPHERIC GAS TESTING RESULTS

8. Periodic gas testing required / / I : / STANDBY-WORKER COMMUNICATION:

/ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. /

-. -- ---

0 a CLASS e O CLASS c . TYPE OF C0P;FINED SPACE:

I BADGE NO.:.

1 J k SECTION G - OPEN FLAMEMELDING PERMIT

PRECAUTIONS VERIFIED (wf lhm 35 leer ol work) IYESl NO [DNA ! CamDuslibles. magnesium and uranium have been removed.

xve red or shielded. 2 '!ammable liauids nave been removed or isolated.

-. ._ ----

- I

T I

ATERIAL PERMIT ' i ~ TVPE OF M A T E R I A L /NAME OF MATERIALISI !

PRECAUTION TAKEN I . Equlpnent and:r,r lines have been arainea.

2. Valves nave been closed and locked (when feasible) f lushec. purgec 01 neutralized .

and aanaer t a m e d

--

3 'wall ana floor openings are covered or protected.

,.mderneath work. 1 : 4 A flame retarden! tarp has been suspended ! !

5 4 combustible gas check has been made. , .

5 -worl( on walls,ceilings) : ; c?mbustibles %we Been removed from opposite sides.

4 Ftre watcn will be required and WIII remain posted ciurlng ! !

3 ?,re Watch is supplied with an extinguisher and know-now to 1 ! '

9 :,re 6 Safety Inspector wall be presenl Ouring the burning oDerati0n. j : I

-- -

1 I - -- -. . xeaics and for 30 minutes after work is completed.

- - .:cti~ate the nearest fire alarm.

' 10 Fire 8 Safety Inspector shall be present to monitor when the

COMBUSTIBLE GAS TESTING RESULTS: system I S initially opened. ! I

--- . I I ~

jDADGE NO.. .DATE: I

OF COPIES I

~ ~~~~ ~ ~~

EO U I P M E NTI A R EA CH E c K E o : SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS/PRECAUTlON~:

I -1 123 1 BADGE NO.: FIRE b SAFETY INSPECTOR SIGNATURE

PERMIT ISSUED DATE: TIME:

EVIEWED AND USE

- I I

0AOGE NO

I B 1 B I II E 8 1 st

SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS ITEM YESIJO

- V I , 1. Equipment cleaned and ourgea 2. Nuclear Salely cnecks comoleteo __ 3. LOCk 8 Tag Procedures reauired a m '311owec - ._ .. _. -_ _ _ ., . - 4. Water in soace nas oeen colleciec a p ~ samoled 5. Complete isolation 01 orocess lines !o space nas been completed 6. A l l mecnantcal eauipment lo me spaco nave 3een tagged.

disconnected and/or blocked I4 7. Electrical isolation complete for Lock 3 Tag Procedure r

8. Al l lines within soace have been cleaned and ourged Ji Equipm CILITY OWNER'S SIGNATURE)

------- --. f l

I SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: I

0 CLASS A $ICLASS B 0 CLASS .t I BADGENO.. .

TYPE OF CONFINE0 SPACE:

- 2, 'lame retardevt tarp has been suspended -- - .--- - ..: ,.-aerneath work 8AOGE NO O A T € ? ,' I --- .-

5 A comoustible gas check has been made. 6 ,work on wallslceilings)

All combustibles have been removed from opposite sides. 7 A Fire Watch will be required and will remain posted during

? .:.re Walch is supplied with an extinguisher and know-how lo

'

--- breaks and lor 30 minutes after work is completed. I

.-. ?c_livaie lhe nearest fire alarm. I

:,-? 4 Safely InsDectar snail be present auring tne ourning operation I -ere C Safety Inspeclor Snail be present lo monitor when the I . ' : sysiem is initially opened.

PRECAUTION TAKEN 1 . ECIJ~DT~COI a r r gr ;L: 'CS h+)e -.?e- :*a~neg.

!!c;snes purcpc 3: vu:ral;ze!: . - . _ _ - . . - . - . . . - . . . . - . - -. . .- -

a'd a a n w 'a!%e:-. .- _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _-__ 5 1

area isolarec COMBUSTIBLE GAS TESTING RESULTS: I

EOUlPMENTlAREA CHECKED: I 6. Soecial precautlons. I

. _ _ _ . . . . _. . . . I - L I

F!(IE % SAFETY INSPECTOR SIGNATURE: 0ADCE NO.. : 124 I -- -_-___- ------- - I B A D G E NO O A T € I

PERMIT 8SSUEO OATL 1 TIME

EVIEWED AND USE

1 P O S T A T J O B - -_ - - _ _ __ -- 2 SUPERVISOR-IN-CHARGE- _ _ -

SECTION B - TYPES OF PERMITS REOUIRED I-ecsec:, ;,.je,iiso:..n.C'ldr;?,l

TYPE OF CONFINED SPACE: n U CLASS A B C L A S S 8 0 CLASS C

BAOGE NO :

7/54 1139- TIM :

SECTION G - OPEN FLAMEWELDING PERMIT PRECAUTIONS VERIFIED (within 35 leer ol work) YES[ NO IDNA

'

2 Ciammable iiauids have been removed or Isolated. I

3 Wall and floor openings are covered or ororected. 4 A flame retardent larp has been suspended

ltnaerneath work. 5 A combustible gas check has been made. 6. :work on wallsiceillngs)

A i l combustibles 9me been removed from opposite %des , .- - A Fire Wat tn will be required and will remain posted during oLr?ahs and for 30 mlnules after work is completed. ?:re Wafct- lssuppiiea with an extinguisher and know-how to aciivale the nearest fire alarm. :.re d Salefv InsDectar snail ae oresent durina me ournina ooeration

Pcmbuslibles. magnesium and uranium have been removed. 1 xwered or snlelaed - - ._

.-_ -

I

-..-

-- .-

' ,

: i

7 I ASBESTOS

CI RAOlATlON

5 CHEMICAL HAZARDOUS VATERIAL

5 CONFINED SPACE ENTRY !CODY IO be aticneai

tCoov 10 be altacneal n OPEN CLAME WELDING

PERMIT 1SSULO OATL:

- I

TIYE

SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS 1 ITEM i Y E S N O 1

REVIEWED AND R USE

BADGE NO.: OAT

1. Zauicmert clearrea and Durgea 2. Nuclear Satety checks comcrletea-

- @*- 3. LOCk 8 Taa Proceaures reautrea ana L31towea

u 14. water In space has been collected ana samoted - 5.-ComDle!e isolation of process lines IO space has Deeo corrpietea I/ 6. A l l mecnanical equ.Dmenl to *ne space ' w e been 3gge.j

ascorrreciea and'or blocked

--

/ 6 c c &yQ I CTION 0 - PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EOUIPMENT REQUIRED I

b EOUIPMENT i V E S NO SPECIFY -A ! ____________ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . ____ .. .

1:7.-.j - -. - . - - Eve Protection

Y

Acid Splasn S u i ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~~~

Gloves Respiratory Profection IconsuIt svith IH reo.) Flame Retardent Clolhing DisoosaDie Hood C,r,.eraits an6 Shoe N o r - gver Comoari-/-lssued C:o!ning

-- .. .--. -.___-

1 --

I: 8 OTHER PROTECTION REOIJIREMENTS

. . . . .. - ---

I ,

TERIAL PERMIT - OF MATEAIALiSI

1 SECTION F - CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT /Valialornomorernrn 12nours

ATMOSPHERIC GAS TESTING RESULTS TOXICITY OXYGEN CONTENT COMBUSTIBLE QAS

- /

I !O Fire 8 Safely lnsoeclor shall be oresent 10 monitor when the I I I system is in;tially opened.

COMBUSTIBLE GAS TESTING RESULTS: EOUlPMENTlAREA CHECKED: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS~PRECAUTIONS:

A

FIRE 1 SAFETY INSPECTOR SIGNATURE:

' - 1 4 b W 451 Work Permlt Number:

F COPIES

.__ 1 POST __-. AT -. JOB. .. _ _ _ _ .. 2 'XU PEA v I SO A. IN .C HA A G E- . - - __ - - -. <

I [SECTION B . TYPES OF PERMITS AEOUIRED T 9 9 c ~ 3 , s s e ' d ' s c l .n ' - 3 f ~ o 1 ISECTION F - CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT ~ v r s g t O r n o m o ~ ~ r n a n

-.

8AOGE NO.: DATE I 7i3 / &/@

I

SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS ITEM /YES,NO

I -- _- - 1. Eouioment cleaned an0 Durged

3. Lock 8 Tag Procedures regi.iirea and !311owed

4. 'Natef : P soace "as oeen collected an0 samoled

5. C9mpie:e tsolation 0 1 ctrocess lines IO space p a s D e e r comcletes- i y - -

2. Nuclear Saletycnecks comoleteo ! /

I --- -... I-. . I - ___-__. . - . - .- .- - .-

6. A l l -necnanlca! eau:pnefit ! 3 'ne jDaCZ n a v 9 beor> :295e2

7. Electrical e.olaticn complete for Luck d Tag Procedure

8. All lines within scace have been cleaned and Durged Eguip LITY OWNER'S SIGNATURE).

i J '

I / - I / -

1IscmnecteO ;InC:or DIocxeo - - ---- ' - --

I

TIME

c: 7 &.' d I 'CTION D - PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EOUIPMENT REOUIRED 1 -

, EQUIPMENT l Y E S i NO ! SPECIFY J ~~

- face Shield

Hearing Protection

Eve Protection

MATER I A L PERM IT I'

TVPE OF MATERIAL. iNAME OF HATERIAL(S1' I I -

PRECAUTION TAKEN / Y E S NO .DNA, 1. Equipment ana 3 r l ines have been Graineo.

2. valves have been closed and IOCkeC iwhen feasible) . .. . ---- llusned. purged or neutralized _-

ana danger ' a s y e c - __ -_ _ _ _. _ _ - _ _ - - -- . EEsolatea- .. . __ - .- - - .. _ _ - .. - - -.I

I 16. Spec:al precau1,ons

I .------

'BADGE NO.: :DATE: -I

ATMOSPHERIC OAS TESTING RESULTS OXYGEN CONTENT COMBUSTIBLE GAS TOXICITY

' - U E READINGS TIME ' READINGS TIME I READINGS I I33J ;J.o - io

L'JLJC L?l,LL- 1330 0 J

- _ _ . .-- 03" l0.c s I

I I I _ _ .- i --- I

PRECAUTIONS TAKENINEEDED I Y E S ; NO .DNA.

17. %OnSDarkinO tools reauired I ' A 8. Deriodic gas testing required f L 1. d STANDBV.WORKER COMMUNICATION:

f c ; Q I I 9 . 1 - - SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ___-

0 CLASS A @CLASS B 0 CLASS C , TVPE OF CONFINE0 SPACE

I BADGENO.:

126 ! BADGE NO.: FIRE b SAFETY INSPECTOR SIGNATURE:

IC~& to i e attacnea) 5 QPE_'J FLAME:WELDING

SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS ITEM !YES NO

- ---- 1. Ecrjioment cleanpa a m ourgeo 2. Nuclear Saterycnecks comoietec 3. Lock 8 Tag Procedures required anc 'oliowed 4. w a t e r y soace ha5 been colieciea v c samoled __ 5. Cornpie!e IsolaTin at 3rocess ilnes IC wace has been cmo le tea 6. A i l mechanlca' ?:ulcmenr 19 !n? s c i c = ?avo ceon :agSe:

______-----.

I 'SECTION B - TYPES OF PERMITS REOUIAED ~ n e r * e a v s v o e r w o ~ c * a q SECTION F . CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT /Vai id /ornomore,*ar I ? - ~ , ~ S

ASBESTOS 'z ChEUICAL HAZARDOUS U A T E R I A L ATMOSPHERIC GAS TESTING RESULTS iCooy to Be atlchedl OXYGEN CONTENT COMBUSTIBLE GAS TOXICITY

r RADIATION - U E 2EAOlNGS TIME I REAOINGS TIME ! REAClNGS %C:VFINED SPACE E Y T R Y

1 c /yOclo ,O - (6

._ t -______ PRECAUTIONS TAKENINEEDED

~:-->Ork rewi res staging or l a d d e r

-.- -- .l?eqLate/oroper ~iiminallon required ----

;BAOGE NO QAT

ERIAL PERMIT F M A T E R I A L I S I I

PRECAUTION TAKEN YES! NO DNA 1. Equipment ana or l ines have bee? .:rained

flushed ouraed or neutralized m12. Valves have been closed and Iocweg !when feasiole) I ; I

I 'BADGE NO O A T €

,927 A/6 7I

5 Stiinnby - -- notified N3at action to take - - 6. Safety line ano harness reouired T: N O P s 0 a r k i n g too 1 s rea u i red 8. Periodic gas testira required / / / - STANOBY*WORKLR COYYUNlCATION:

I I

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS -_-- I- I

TVEE OF CONFINE0 SPACE

I BAOCEHO I

I--- 2 CLASS A

7/q j TIME,

SECTION G - OPEN FLAME/WELDING PERMIT

e / y m ; PRECAUTIONS VERIFIED (wilhin 35 lee? 01 work) ' YES NO DNA

I * ,3muSliBleS. magnesium and uranium have been removed

xverea or shtelaed t f G B l e liauias nave Been removed or isolated I 2 Wall and floor menmgs are covered or protected. I 4 A flame retaraent !arp has been suspended

underneath work 5 A combustible gas check has been made.

+I COmDustibleS -ave Seer! removed from opposite sides. 5. Fire Watch wil l 2e required and will remain posted durinG

I work on walls.'cail.ngs)

.- 3reaKs ana for 3C m w t e s after work is completed. ::re Watch is suppi;ea with an extinguisher ana know-how to ji activate the nearest fire alarm.

9 ;Ire 8 Safety InspectJr 511811 be present during the Burning ooeratton 10 Fire d Safety Inspector shall be present to monitor when the 1 '

I ' I sfstem IS iniliallv ?pened. I 1 COMBUSTIBLE GAS TESTING RESULTS: EOUIPMENTIAREA CHECKED: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS. PRECAUTIONS

I I FIRE 1 SAFETY INSPECTOR SIGNATURE

PERMIT ISSUED OAT€ /TIME

ATION REVIEWED AND BLE FOR USE

/

I I

---.

1 I

I

I f l : 1. Eauicment cleaned ana purged --____ 2. Nuclear S a f z CnEc-ks comoleteo 3. ;9Ck 8 rag Proceaares reauirec aria *3llowec 4. .iVarer 1 - scacr has beeri.collectec qrf samoiea 5. Cmnole!e isoiatir?n of process :'res : P soace -as w e n Ia-r:le!eg ' J - _.I.. -- -..----- .---_... --L-- 6. 411 mecranical ecuiomenr !o tne s o z c c ;lave 3een :aggec.

mcornecrea anc'or 31ocked 7. E!ectrical isolat1_o? complete for L x k 3 Tag Procectire 8. All lines winin scace have been cleaned and purged EuL;iomer:t LITY OWNER'S SIGNATURE)

d

J ~ -- -... .

-__-- . . - . . . - -. - - - . _. . . . . . . . . . - - . - - . . - - -. - .. - . - . - - -. .. . .- . . . - .

. .- I / .

J -

I

E,.,.- ~ ec ventilation reauirea bVow recuires staging or ladder Ground Fault lnteruotina orotectton reauired

- -------- - - --

D

, J '

7'- -

W o r k Permit .. Number. - . 1 4 O l I

4. Aceguateioroper illumination required c 5. Standby notified wnat action to take &/

6. Safety line ana narness reauired

,

>- 7 - NonsDarking tools reauired 4-- . .d

T I I I I

.l

SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS ITEM [YES NO

-. - CTION 0 - PERSONAL PROTESTIVEUIPMENT RE,OUlRED - -

]YES N O . SPECIFY . --- I EOUIPMENT

-- PRECAUTION TAKEN J Y E S : NO .DN&

I. Equior*ent ana J r l ines nave Dee3 r i a inea .

2. '/Blves -ave tee-: cIc)seC anc I o c x x 'w?r feas.Sle,

3. Area !solated 4. Safety snower I S operable close :c vdorksile 5. Special c lothing or other protec:ive equipment required I- 6. Soecial precautions'

I

!- -- - 'IsJSn?C Surgra or ?eu:ratczec I . -- ._ ~ _ _

_I----- 3na can5er ' a s 3 ! L . -. .- . . ... - ... . - . -_ '

. .. - - . -. - . - - _ - - __ __ _. - __ -. . -._-. -

1

SECTION F - CONFINED SPACE ENTRY PERMIT /Vilrdlornomorrrnan 12no~rr - ATMOSPHERIC GAS TESTING RESULTS

TOXICITY OXYGEN CONTENT COMBUSTIBLE GAS 'IME READINGS TIME READINGS TIME READlhGS

/Yo<! J / , / q . 4 /L/yT b % N o f 4 .0 -co .I -- / Y O 5 0 . d - H L ~ ,

RIAL PERMIT [NAME OF MATEAIAL(S~

P

SECTION G - OPEN FLAME/WELDING PERMIT PRECAUTIONS VERIFIED /wifhm 35 leer 01 w o r k ) (YES' NO 'DNA

! 1

t 2 Flammable liauids have been removed or isolated

Zombustibles. magnesium and uranium have been removed. :overed or shielded .

L.;.-2ail and floor ooenings are covered or protected. I .: flame retarcent taro has been SuSpenOed

i. ,c:dernearh work __ I .. i rzmbustiole gas cnecn nas been made

1.7 - , W Z ~ on walls. ceilings, ;

L . -o reaks and for 30 minutes after work is completed.

L.y-?c::vale the nearest fire alarm

i All combustibles nave been removed from opposite sides. -'.-A Fire Watcn wtll be required and will remain posted during

=,re Watch I S supplied with an extinguisher and know-now to . .

be present during Ine burning Operation I = re a Safety irspector shall be present to monitor 'when tne I

' I -1

j jS lem is initially openeo I !

COMBUSTIBLE GAS TESTING RESULTS: EQUIPMENT/AREA CHECKED: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONSIPRECAUTIONS:

I I !

I I e

I I

I --- I -

AE/WErC1NG I

SECTION C - GENERAL PRECAUTIONS ITEM ' Y E S NO

---_._-.._ 1. Eauiomenr cleaneo an0 ourqed 2. %clear Safety cnec*.s c o m ~ 3 : c ,

3. Lock 8 Tag Procedures reabirec ana %lowe0 h. water: space has been collectea ana sampled

6. All mechanical equioment 13 tne mace nave been 'aggel

- - -. - - - . - .. -- . . . . .

'5. Compie!e iso~?!pz o f Drocess Iices to SDaCe has oeen

Eou1ome LITY OWNER'S SIGNATURE)

-----. , T I M E :

~~

CTlON D - PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT REQUIRED SPECIFY

ATMOSPHERIC GAS TESTING RESULTS OXYGEN CONTENT I COMBUSTIBLE GAS I TOXICITY --

-!ME REAOINGS TIME I READINGS TIME ! REAOINGS

- / Q c ~ &. PA 1 q/o I D Z /4//olD ,G - U __ . . . - . . - . . . . - . .

_ _ . . - ... . -- - . -..-- I

/ C / / O I n.d - /4 r5~ I

I

PRECAUTIONS TAKENINEEDED I Y E S , NO 'DNA 1. F3rced ventilaiion reauired 1

.Ir

r/ 4 ~-

- vc' - Satetv line and rarness reauired -- - -_

8. ;erOaic gas testing required , /

/ I

/e f S T A N 0 8 1 -WORKER COMMUNICATION:

SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: / ~ -- ---

, &LASS 6 (7 CLASS C J (1 IFEOF CONFINE0 SPACE.

I BAOCENO

, - i . r r u j I SECTION G - OPEN FLAME/WELDING PERMIT

PRECAUTIONS VERIFIED (wrlhtn 35 leer of work) IYES' NO :DNA

I * Combustibles magnesium and uranium have been removed

1 -*amrnable licutds nave been removed or isolated

I : ? a ' ~ and %or m e m a s are covered or Drolected

?verea ? r snieiaed - ---

A A '!ame retardent taw has oeen suspended ,derneath work t ._ A combustible gas check has been made. ' !

I 1 wcrK on walls/ceilings) AI! ,:ornbustibles have been rem.oved from opposite siaes. f Fore Watch .will be required ana will remain posted during :r?aqs a r a !or 3~ mtwtes after work is completed.

:c!.va!e tne nearest fire alarm.

ATERIAL PERMIT ' - 7.- INAME OF MATERIAL(S):

I I TYPE OF M A T E R I A L

, -- --.- -_- with an extinguisher and know-how to I I -

3 8 Safety Inspectar mall be presenl during the burning operalion. : 4

!O Ftre 8 Safety Inspector shall be present to monitor when lh8 j ' __c

system IS initially opened. , .

GAS TESTING RESULTS:

PRECAUTION TAKEN _ _ 1. Zpuipmerlt ar .1 J : "res !?abe "2ec C'dinecl

f lushec p u r q w 01 ne~ t ra l t zec 2. Valves have been closed and IocKee [when feasible)

3. Area isolated

__ -- - and danger w g e c __ _ _

.-

--.-- I EAOCE NO. OATE: 1 TIME: PERMIT ISSUED OATE:

'i Y li e

Section IV

Radiological Survey Reports

130

Y

- - - .__ -

.$ :$ -5 FMPC 451

INDUSTRIAL. RAOIOLOQICAL SAFETY & TRAlNlNQ - RAOlOLOalCAL SAFETY RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT -

of -

' -k

I LOCA ION r na1: - 4 -.

L . - :a - - - ate: /[,, ( . , . . !/zj &-I k&J/ / /l L e x/ tC)J/b CP Page x-

L K V I L -

1

SPECIAL REQUEST 0 RWP 0 INCIDENT - *

- - *- INSTRUMENTS -e

MODEL UERIAL NUMBER CALIBRATION DATE BKRO. CFI.

Y/o 7

I I I I

- - .-. ALPHA -I ? : ANALYZE COR:

jc

BETA-GAMMA OTHER CONTAMINATION ..

I rrpe or sunvev

.. - - - *>..

-4- FMPC ' -

INOUSTRIAL. RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY TRAlNlNQ - AAOIOLOCI4CAL SAFETY

DESCRIPTION

c

1 slf

1

S f 1

I

I

I '*

-

NOTIFICATION OF SURVEY RESULTS

* DATE REVIEWED NOTIFIED BY BY DATE SUPERVISOR TIME

NOTIFIED 1 Radiological Safety Technician Supervisor 2 Radiolooical Safety Engineer 3 Facility SupeWiSOr . . . .

. ..

. . , -.. . . -. . . . FMPC

INOUSTRIAL. RAOIOLOQICAL SAFETY 6 TRAINING - RAOIOLOGICAL SAFETY

DESCRIPTION

. . .. . . ..

PMPC-IRSLT-10051 (REV. 3/1u#))

. . . . ._.. ____._ -_... ~ . . . . . . . . ..- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AI-

. . . . . . .. - . . . . . . . . . . . . m

137

451-

I

I

J

138

- Air Test

Ref ere nces

The NASSCO criteria is a nationally accepted basis for the "Air Testing" of sewer lines. The following references utilize the services of American Test and Seal to perform this test according to the noted specifications.

I I I I

I I I I I

City of Fairfield Mr. Larry Ceasar, Inspector

(5 1 3) 867-5300

Butler County Sewer & Water inspection Mr. Elmer Meyers (51 3) 887-3061

139 --

I

Date post:	06-Aug-2021
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	2 times
Download:	0 times