REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FROM DESIGN-BUILD …...Oct 31, 2017 · engineering services as needed...

South Orange County Community College District October 31, 2017

RFQ – Saddleback College ATAS Building Project Page 1 of 25

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

FROM DESIGN-BUILD ENTITIES

FOR

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED SCIENCE (ATAS)

BUILDING PROJECT

AT

SADDLEBACK COLLEGE

SOCCCD PROJECT NO. 358D

October 31, 2017



TABLE OF CONTENTS

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FROM DESIGN-BUILD ENTITIES

FOR

SADDLEBACK COLLEGE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED SCIENCE

(ATAS) BUILDING PROJECT

PROJECT NO. 358D

TITLE PAGE……………………………………………………………………………………...1

TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………….2

Notice Calling for Pre-Qualification Submittals…………………………………………………..3

ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS………………………………………………………………………4

ARTICLE 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RFP PROCESS……………………………...5

ARTICLE 3 DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY’S REPRESENTATIONS……………………………..11

ARTICLE 4 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOCUMENTS, SCHEDULE AND

PROCEDURES…………………………………………………………………………………..11

ARTICLE 5 SCORING AND RANKING OF DESIGN-BUILD ENTITIES…………………..19

ARTICLE 6 NOTICE AND APPEAL OF DISTRICT DECISION…………………………….22

ARTICLE 7 ATTACHMENTS………………………………………………………………….253

ATTACHMENT NO. 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PROGRAM

SUMMARY AND SITE MAP

ATTACHMENT NO. 2: PRE-QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT NO. 3: SUPPLEMENTAL QUALIFICATIONS

INFORMATION



ATTACHMENT NO. 4: PRELIMINARY DRAFT PROJECT SCHEDULE

ATTACHMENT NO. 5: DRAFT DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT



NOTICE CALLING FOR BIDS

NOTICE CALLING FOR BIDS

District: SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

Project: BID NO. 358D: RFQ for Design-Build Entity for the Advanced

Technology and Applied Science (ATAS) Building Project, Saddleback

College

RFQ Submittal

Deadline:

2:00 P.M., December 1, 2017

Mailing Address &

Place of Proposal

Receipt:

South Orange County Community College District

Health Sciences Building, 3rd Floor

Purchasing & Facilities Planning Department

28000 Marguerite Parkway

Mission Viejo, CA 92692

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the South Orange County Community College District, of

Orange County, California, acting by and through its Governing Board, hereinafter referred to as

"DISTRICT," will receive up to, but not later than, the above-stated time, responses to the Request

for Qualifications (RFQ) for the above Project.

Complete Request for Qualifications documents including the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire will

be available at the Office of the Executive Director of Facilities Planning and Purchasing department

at the above address, telephone (949) 582-4678 or on-line at www.socccd.edu at the Bids link.

Project description: This project consists of three phases: Phase 1: A new 45,000 G.S.F., Design-

Build, LEED Gold equivalent, two-story building. Phase 2: New tennis courts facility consisting of

eight courts, restrooms, and locker rooms. Phase 3: A proposed surface parking lot encompassing

an estimated 54,000 square foot area, with an estimated 100 - 150 parking spaces with site lighting.

This project includes abatement and demolition of the existing TAS Building.

The project will use design-build delivery authorized by Education Code Section 81700 et seq. The

project value is estimated at $30 million for Phase 1. Sequencing of the Phases is negotiable.

There will be a mandatory pre-proposal conference at 10:00 A.M., November 13, 2017, at

Saddleback College in the Health Sciences (HS) Building, 3rd floor at 28000 Marguerite Parkway,

Mission Viejo, CA 92692. Attendance is mandatory in order to be considered for prequalification

for this project.

Time is of the essence. Failure to submit a response within the time set forth will result in rejection

of the submittal. Design-build Entity, as defined by Education Code section 81701(c), must timely

submit a completed Pre-Qualification Questionnaire and be pre-qualified by the DISTRICT.

Nawar Al Juburi

http://www.socccd.edu/



Project Manager

PUBLISH: THE REGISTER

October 31, 2017 &

November 7, 2017



ARTICLE 1

DEFINITIONS

1.1 GENERAL

Capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in, or (if none is

assigned) as reasonably understood to apply to them by the context of, the portion of the

Request for Qualifications documents where such terms are used.

1.2 DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY

The term “Design-Build Entity” as used in the Request for Qualifications (RFQ)

and Pre-Qualification documents shall denote the meaning as prescribed in Education

Code section 81701 (c).

1.3 DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY MEMBERS

The term “Design-Build Entity Member(s)” as used in the in the Request for

Qualifications (RFQ) and Pre-Qualification documents means any member of a

corporation, company, limited partnership, partnership, or other association or legal

entity that is able to provide appropriately licensed contracting, architectural, and

engineering services as needed pursuant to a design-build contract. If a Design-Build

Entity Member, or a firm having an ownership interest in a Design-Build Entity Member,

is itself a partnership, joint venture or other association of persons or legal entities, then

the term Design-Build Entity Member includes any and all of the individuals,

corporations, partnerships, joint ventures or other associations of persons or legal entities

that holds an ownership interest in or that share in the profits and losses of such Design-

Build Entity Member or firm.

1.4 GENERAL CONTRACTORS, ARCHITECT OF RECORD, PRINCIPAL

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, PRINCIPAL CIVIL ENGINEER,

ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTORS, MECHANICAL

SUBCONTRACTORS

The capitalized terms General Contractors, Architect of Record, Principal

Structural Engineer, Principal Civil Engineer, Electrical Subcontractor(s), and

Mechanical Subcontractor(s) shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Pre-

Qualification Questionnaire (Attachment 2).

1.5 PROPOSERS

The term Proposers shall mean the Pre-Qualified Design-Build Entities whose

qualifications submittals are the most highly ranked and invited by the District to submit

Proposals for the design and construction of the Saddleback College Advanced

Technology and Applied Science (ATAS) Building Project ("Project").



ARTICLE 2

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RFP PROCESS

2.1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

2.1.1 This project consists of three distinct phases. Note that the

sequencing of the Phases is negotiable.

Phase 1: A new approximately 45,000 GSF, LEED Gold equivalent, two-story building

serving Architecture, Drafting, Electronics, Environmental Studies, Graphics Design,

Horticulture, associated labs, conference rooms, administration and faculty offices. This

new building will be constructed at the existing Saddleback College tennis courts.

Demolition of the existing tennis courts and infrastructure will be required prior to

construction of the new building.

Phase 2: New tennis courts facility consisting of eight courts, restrooms, and locker

rooms at a new campus location to be determined. Note that the final location will be

confirmed during the Criteria and Programming Phase.

Phase 3: Relocation of utilities currently serving other buildings and areas of campus

from the existing TAS Building. Utilities relocation will be followed by abatement and

demolition of the existing TAS Building. A proposed surface parking lot (approximately

54,000 square feet in area) with an estimated 100 to 150 parking spaces with site lighting

will be constructed at the current location of the existing TAS Building and the

Automotive Yard.

2.1.2 See Saddleback College ATAS Building Project Description and

Program Summary. (Attachment 1).

2.1.3 Location of Site. The Project site is located at 28000 Marguerite

Parkway, Mission Viejo, CA 92692.

2.1.4 Scope of Project. The scope of the Project includes: (1) the design

(based on Project Criteria furnished by the District as part of the Request for Proposals

(RFP) process) and construction (based on detailed Construction Documents prepared by

the successful Design-Build Entity that are approved by District and the Division of the

State Architect (DSA)) of the Project, and incorporate the work of all disciplines

necessary to construct the Project, including, without limitation, all structural and

architectural elements, civil, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, lighting, landscaping,

irrigation, graphics, signage, fire alarm, sprinkler systems; and (2) the completed design

(based on documents furnished by the District as part of the Project Criteria) and

construction (based on detailed Construction Documents prepared by the successful

Design-Build Entity that are approved by District, DSA and State and Local Agencies

having jurisdiction) of all Site work, such as, but not limited to, grading, site utilities,

sidewalks, parking, vehicle drive lanes and curbs within the boundaries and off-site work

as required by the RFP.

2.1.5 Collaborative Project Delivery.



The District’s primary objective is to select a Design-Build Entity with the best available

and most relevant design and construction expertise. The Design-Build Entity must

include experience and/or an approach for including Lean - Integrated Project Delivery

(IPD)-like methodology. Include the behavioral principles of mutual respect,

interdependency, collaboration, and open communication necessary to achieve a high-

performing team. Principles must demonstrate ability to successfully design and

construct to meet scope, budget, and schedule within the District’s stipulated Maximum

Allowable Price (MAP).

The District desires a project delivery approach integrating stakeholders and the Design-

Build Entity while using proven systems and practices through all phases of design and

construction. The project delivery approach must ensure the highest quality of design and

construction allowable within the project budget, while developing a building that

maximizes the District’s operational efficiencies and minimizes operational costs.

The District will facilitate a collaborative project management approach, using applicable

Lean/IPD-like design and construction methodologies, adapted to a publicly funded

capital project. The specifics of this approach will be further described in the RFP and

contract form of agreement.

The proposals provided by the Design-Build Entity are required to demonstrate a clear

understanding of the project requirements and challenges as well as a willingness to work

collaboratively with the District to establish a successful outcome. The proposed project

delivery approach is expected to integrate people, systems, business structures, and

practices into a process that collaboratively harnesses the talents and insights of all

participants to optimize project results, increase value to the owner, reduce waste, and

maximize efficiency through all phases of design, fabrication, and construction.

The District has formed an ATAS design-phase project team (Project Team) including

representatives of, district staff, the criteria architect and associated consultants, Faculty

and Administration, college Facilities Maintenance and Operations, college Police and

college Information Technology staff. The District’s Project Team will be responsible

for collaborative participation in the Design-Build Entity design-phase, and then support

the Design-Build Entity as needed throughout construction and occupancy. The team

will be supported, as needed, by the District’s Design-Build Process Consultant with

expertise in the adaptation of Lean – IPD-like tools and processes for California

Community College projects.

2.1.6 BIM. The District will require the use of Building Information

Modeling (BIM) for the design and construction of the proposed building including

architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire sprinkler and building

envelope systems. BIM standards will be included with the Request for Proposals. In

order to accomplish the desired collaborative delivery, the successful design-build

proposer will be required to list the various trades that will participate in the BIM process.

2.1.7 Design-Build Budget. The total Design Build Entity’s budget for the

design and construction of Phase 1, building construction cost, is approximately

$30,000,000. The budgets for Phases 2 and 3 are still under development during the

criteria document preparation, and will be added to this total after criteria completion.

The revised budget amount shall be used in the initial Design-Build agreement. After



DSA approval and agreement on the Maximum Allowable Price (MAP), a change order

to the contract will be issued to adjust the contract lump sum to be in accordance with

the actual MAP. This amount includes all costs of the complete design, engineering,

construction, supervision, management, compliance with all applicable codes and agency

requirements, and any and all items required for the completion of the project per the

Contract Documents, except costs for items specifically identified as not a part of the

Design-Build Budget. Items anticipated to be provided by the District include hazardous

material survey, geotechnical report and topographic, preliminary utility surveys and

procurement of furniture, fixtures and equipment (Design-Build Entity coordination

efforts will be required). Responses to the Request for Proposal will be required to

include a total price proposal that is less than or equal to the Design-Build Budget.

2.1.8 Contract Time. See Article 4.2.1 for the preliminary project

schedule. The estimated Contract Time allocated by the District for design and

construction of phases of the Project from the issuance of a Notice to Proceed (NTP) for

commencement of design to the point of Final Completion is currently established at 914

calendar days for Phase I. Contract Time, which may be more or less than, or equal to,

the period of time just stated, will be set forth in the RFP Documents. Responses to the

Requests for Proposal will be required to include a proposed period of time for design

and construction that is less than or equal to the Contract Time.

2.1.9 Liquidated Damages. The Design-Build Contract includes

provisions for payment of liquidated damages to the District of $3,750 per Calendar Day

if the Design-Builder fails to Substantially Complete the Work within the Contract Time

as adjusted for extensions of time permitted under the terms of the Contract Documents

of the Design-Build Contract. In addition, “short-listed” Design-Build Entities invited

to submit Design-Build Proposals include in their Design-Build Proposals a daily amount

payable by District to the Design-Build Entity for Compensable Delays. In accordance

with the terms of the Contract Documents, in accordance with Public Contract Code

section 7203, the set liquidated amount to the Design-Builder shall constitute the Design-

Builder’s exclusive compensation covering all costs, expenses and damages due to

Compensable Delay that are incurred by Design-Builder and its Subcontractors and Sub-

consultants of every Tier. No other compensation to Design-Builder for costs, expenses

or damages associated with Delay shall be permitted. Liquidated amounts for the tennis

courts and parking lot will be determined before final contract execution.

2.1.10 No Warranty by District. Design-Build Entities are solely

responsible to satisfy themselves as to the suitability of any surveys, estimates,

projections, budgets, design concepts, technical criteria or similar information provided

by the District or reviewed by them relating to the proposed Project. Nothing stated in

this Request for Qualifications or in any other information provided by the District shall

be construed as implying the creation or existence of any warranty, express or implied,

on the part of the District with respect thereto.

2.2 SUMMARY OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PROCESS

Only those Applicants who are shortlisted in the RFQ process will proceed to the RFP

process.



2.2.1 Informational Summary. The provisions of this Section 2.2 are

intended to summarize for Design-Build Entities the process that the District intends to

follow in respect to issuance of its Request for Proposals, consideration of Design-Build

Proposals from Proposers and Award of the Design-Build Contract. This summary is

provided for the convenience of the Design-Build Entities and should not be interpreted

as a complete or definitive statement of all procedures, conditions, requirements or

standards that may apply to any of the aforementioned processes. The District reserves

the right, at any time, and in the exercise of its sole and absolute discretion, to modify

such procedures, conditions, requirements or standards, by changes, additions or

deletions thereto.

2.2.2 Two-Stage Design-Build Selection. The process for Award of the

Design-Build Contract is a two-stage process.

.1 Stage 1 will consist of a Request for Qualifications (RFQ),

(the Pre-Qualification and shortlisting Process) to include Pre-qualification of

proposers and further evaluations of their qualifications to arrive at a “short-list”

of three (3) Design-Build Entities who, based on the scoring by the District’s

Evaluation Committee of their responses and other information provided in

response to the RFQ and potential interviews, are determined to be ranked the

most qualified to design and construct the Project. The District reserves the right

to qualify more or less than three (3) Design-Build Entities if it believes it has

sufficient reason to do so. The procedures and required forms for Qualification

are set forth in the Request for Qualifications, of which these Instructions are a

part. Each Design Build Entity interested in Pre-Qualifying and submitting

qualifications shall notify the District via email of firm name and contact

information in accordance with the schedule for receipt of any addenda

information. Each of the Design-Build Entities on this “short-list” will then be

provided a Request for Proposals and invited to submit Design-Build Proposals

for the Project.

.2 Stage 2 will consist of a Request for Proposals (RFP) and a

best value selection to arrive at the final selected Design-Build Entity for

recommendation of contract award to the Board of Trustees. From among the

shortlisted Design-Build Entities from stage 1 that submit Design-Build

Proposals (“Proposers”), one (1) Proposer will receive the Award of the Design-

Build Contract. Selection of the successful Design-Build Entity in stage 2 shall

be based upon pre-established criteria set forth in the Request for Proposals,

which shall include both price and non-price factors and a Design-Build

interview. Recommendation for award of the Design-Build Contract will be made

for the Proposer whose Design-Build Proposal is determined by the District to be

the overall “best value” to the District.

2.2.3 Experience. Credit for experience as non-price evaluative factors in

the design-build competition shall be based only on design-build experience of the

specific individuals submitted as project team members and California school design and

construction experience.

2.2.4 Award. The identity of the successful Proposer, along with its price

proposal and overall combined scoring on the Request for Proposal evaluation, the



District’s ranking of the successful Proposer in relation to the other Proposers and their

respective price proposals, and a summary of the District’s rationale for the contract

award will be published as part of the Board of Trustees action to award the Design-Build

Contract to the successful Proposer.

2.2.5 Design-Build Contract. A copy of the proposed Design-Build

Contract that the District contemplates issuing to the successful Design-Build Entity is

made available with this Request for Qualifications. The District reserves the right,

exercised in its sole discretion, at any time prior to Award to change, by addition,

modification or deletion, any of the terms of the Design-Build Contract in accordance

with the procedures set forth in the RFP Documents.

2.2.6 Proposal Bond, Payment and Performance Bonds, Insurance. Each Design-Build Entity that is invited to submit a Design-Build Proposal for the

Project shall be required, without limitation, to deliver to the District a Proposal Bond as

security to ensure that the successful Design-Build Entity will, if it receives the Award,

enter into the Design-Build Contract and deliver the other Post-Award Submittals

required by the RFP Documents. Additionally, Proposer which is selected for Award of

the Design-Build Contract, shall possess and be required to submit evidence of:

(1) sufficient bonding to cover the full contract price for non-design services utilizing

bond forms included in the RFP Documents (2) errors and omissions insurance coverage

sufficient to cover all engineering, design and architectural services required by the

Design-Build Contract; and (3) all other insurance coverages required to be provided by

the Design-Builder, from an acceptable insurer, under the terms of the Design-Build

Contract, including but not limited to:

o Comprehensive General Liability Insurance with limits of not less than

$2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 general aggregate,

o Builders Risk Insurance sufficient to cover the price of the completed

project,

o Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance,

o Fire Insurance,

o Pollution Legal Liability Insurance in an aggregate amount of not less

than $5,000,000 and with a self-insured retention amount not in excess

of $100,000 per claim.

o Automobile Insurance,

o Worker’s Compensation, and other insurance as required by law and

customary for similar construction projects.

2.2.7 Subcontractors. All subcontracts with Subcontractors which are not

Design-Build Entity members of the successful Proposer’s identified team and who are

not otherwise required to be pre-qualified pursuant to information provided herein, shall

be awarded by the successful Design-Build Entity in accordance with the process set

forth in accordance with Education Code Section 81704(c) and the Request for Proposals,



which shall provide for public notice of the availability of work to be subcontracted and

a fixed date and time on which the subcontracted work will be awarded, and shall afford

to the Subcontractors the protections contained in Chapter 4 (commencing with Section

4100) of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code.

2.2.8 Interested Parties. General Contractors and Architects of Record

will not be allowed to participate in the Request for Proposal process as members of more

than one Design-Build Entity Team or as Subcontractors or Subconsultants to more than

one Design-Build Entity. Consultants or Sub-consultants to the District who are

participants or advisors to the District in respect to selecting the Design-Build Entity for

the Project shall not be allowed to participate as a Design-Build Entity Member or as a

Sub-consultant or Subcontractor, of any Tier, to a Design-Build Entity.

2.2.9 Design-Build Proposals. Design-Build Proposals submitted by

Proposers in response to the RFP shall include, without limitation, ten (10) hard copies

of required submittal and one (1) CD ROM disk or thumb-drive containing all elements

of the Submittal.

2.2.10 Discussions, Negotiations and Limited Negotiations. The District

reserves the right, but shall not have the obligation, as part of the RFP process to hold

Discussions, Negotiations and/or Limited Negotiations with, the Proposers. Procedures

for Discussions, Negotiations, and Limited Negotiations shall be set forth in the Request

for Proposals and/or in instructions issued to Proposers in accordance with the Request

for Proposals.

2.2.11 Ownership, Copyright, Confidentiality and Disclosure.

.1 Ownership, Copyright. Drawings, renderings, models, building

designs, design approaches, design details, construction techniques, procedures,

means and methods and other technical design and construction information

contained within a Design-Build Proposal shall be deemed the sole and exclusive

property of the District, all copyrights thereto shall be deemed assigned to and

held by the District, and the Proposer shall retain no property, copyright or other

proprietary rights with respect thereto; provided, however, that: (1) nothing

herein shall be interpreted as prohibiting or limiting the right of any Proposer that

does not receive Award of the Design-Build Contract to copy, use or incorporate

such technical design information contained within its own Design-Build

Proposal for its own use in connection the conduct of its business, trade or

profession; and (2) with respect to the Proposer who receives Award of the

Design-Build Contract, such Proposer’s rights and obligations with respect to

copying, use or incorporation of such technical design information in any projects

or work other than the Project shall be governed by the terms of the Design-Build

Contract.

.2 Confidentiality of Design and Pricing Information Prior to

Award. District shall make reasonable efforts, consistent with applicable laws,

to refrain from disclosing to competing Proposers prior to Award the content of

any information on design, project management, prices or pricing that is

contained in another Proposer’s Design-Build Proposal.



.3 Confidentiality of Qualification Submittals. Pursuant to Public

Contract Code section 20651.5(a), the Pre-Qualification materials (questionnaire,

answers and financial statements) submitted by Design-Build Entities are not

public records and are not subject to public inspection. All information provided

will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law. State law requires that

the names of Design-Build Entities applying for pre-qualification status shall be

public records subject to disclosure, and the first page of the Questionnaire will

be used for that purpose.

2.2.12 Changing of Team Members. No changes in or additions to Design-

Build Entity Members for the Project shall be permitted after the deadline in the RFP

Schedule for submission of Design-Build Proposals, except with the prior written

authorization of the District, which authorization may be granted or withheld in the

District’s sole discretion. By way of example and without limitation to the foregoing,

any person or entity who is either (1) a Design-Build Entity Member, or (2) a key

employee of a Design-Build Entity Member, shall not be “switched out” or substituted

with other persons or entities after the deadline in the RFP Schedule for submission of

Design-Build Proposals.

2.2.13 Disabled Veteran-Owned Business Participation. The Design-

Build Entity that receives Award of the Design-Build Contract is encouraged to include

disabled-veteran owned businesses as part of their Design-Build Entity. Selected

Proposers will present and be rated on their Disabled-Veteran Owned Business Plans at

the Interviews.

2.2.14 Signing Services. Signing services for persons with a hearing disability

shall be made available upon written request received by the District’s Executive Director

of Facilities Planning and Purchasing at the address for receipt of RFQ submittals at least

three (3) business days prior to the date that such services are required.

ARTICLE 3

DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY’S REPRESENTATIONS

3.1 Each Design-Build Entity, by submitting its Qualifications Submittal, represents

that:

3.1.1 Due Authorization Signatures. Each Pre-Qualification

Questionnaire must be signed under penalty of perjury in the manner designated at the

end thereof, by a representative of the Design-Build Entity that is authorized to

contractually bind the Design-Build Entity. The information provided by the Design-

Build Entity is provided under oath, with the understanding that the intentional providing

of false information is, in itself, grounds for disqualification. Any signer of its Pre-

Qualification Questionnaire that is a corporation must be duly incorporated, authorized

to do business, and in good standing under the laws of the State of California.

3.1.2 Immigration Reform and Control Act. Applicant represents that it,

and each member of its proposed Design-Build Entity is, and at all times during the

performance of the Work shall be, in full compliance with the provisions of the

Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (“IRCA”) as well any similar provisions

of applicable laws setting froth proscriptions or penalties relating to the employment or



hiring of undocumented aliens in connection with the hiring of its employees, and that

Proposer has included in its Design-Build Proposal all costs of compliance therewith.

ARTICLE 4

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOCUMENTS, SCHEDULE AND

PROCEDURES

4.1 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS DOCUMENTS

4.1.1 Qualification Documents. The Request for Qualifications

Documents consist of the following: (1) Advertisement of Design-Build Project and

Opportunity to Qualify to Propose; (2) these Instructions to Design-Build Entities

(including, without limitation, all attachments hereto); (3) Pre-Qualification

Questionnaire; and (4) Request for Qualifications Addenda.

4.1.2 Qualification Submittals. The following documents are required to

be submitted to the District by Design-Build Entities in order to be considered for Pre-

Qualification:

.1 completed and signed Pre-Qualification Questionnaire in the form

attached hereto as Attachment No. 2; and

.2 all other documents or information requested by the Pre-Qualification

Questionnaire or these Instructions to Design-Build Entities.

.3 complete response to requested Supplemental Questionnaire

(Attachment No. 3)

4.2 QUALIFICATION, REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL AND CONTRACT

AWARD SCHEDULE

4.2.1 Procurement Schedule. The following is the anticipated schedule

for the Pre-Qualification and shortlisting process and for the issuance of the Request for

Proposals and Notice of Intent to Award the Design-Build Contract:

.1 Initial Advertisement for Request for Qualifications: October 31, 2017

.2 Subsequent Advertisement for Request for Qualifications: November 7, 2017

.3 Request for Qualifications Documents Available: October 31, 2017

.4 Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference: November 13, 2017

.5 Deadline for Notifying District of Interest to Submit SOQ: November 17, 2017

.6 Deadline for Requests for Clarification: November 22, 2017

.7 Final Addendum, if any: November 28, 2017

.8 RFQ Submittal Response Due: December 1, 2017



.9 Notification of Firms to Be Interviewed: January 5, 2018

.10 Interviews of Applicants (optional): January 11-12, 2018

.11 Notification of Shortlisted Firms: January 15, 2018

.12 Debriefings for Unsuccessful Firms: January 19, 2018

.13 Issuance of Request for Proposals: January 25, 2018

.14 Design-Build Proposals Due: February 28, 2018

.15 Evaluation of Proposals: March 1 – March 21, 2018

.16 Design-Build Proposal Interviews: March 30, 2018

.17 Selection of Top-ranked Firm: March 30, 2018

.18 Contract Negotiations: April 5, 2018

.19 Board Approval of Design-Build Contract: April 23, 2018

.20 Notice to Proceed with Design: April 27, 2018

.21 Project Delivery to District: October 26, 2020

4.2.2 Changes to the RFQ Schedule. The District reserves the right, at

any time, to make additions, modifications or deletions to any of the events or dates that

comprise the RFQ Schedule set forth in, above. Changes made prior to issuance of the

Request for Proposal shall be made by issuance of an Addendum to the Request for

Qualifications. Changes to any dates set forth in the Contract Award Schedule that are

made after issuance of the Request for Proposal shall be made by issuance of an RFP

Addendum in accordance with the terms of the RFP Documents changing the RFP

Schedule.

4.3 QUALIFICATION PROCEDURES

4.3.1 Selection of Shortlist of Design-Build Entities. The District will

select from all of the Design-Build Entities who submit responses to the RFQ, up to three

(3) shortlisted Design-Build Entities who, based on the scoring by the Evaluation

Committee, are determined to be the most qualified to design and construct the Project.

The District reserves the right to shortlist more than three (3) Design-Build Entities if it

believes it has sufficient reason to do so. The selection of those shortlisted Design-Build

Entities to receive the Request for Proposals will be based on objective evaluation of the

information provided by the Design-Build Entity in its Qualifications Submittal,

including the Design-Build Entity’s answers to the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire. All

proceedings related to the Pre-Qualification and shortlist selection of Design-Build

Entities shall be closed to the public.



4.3.2 Evaluation Committee. The Evaluation Committee will conduct on

behalf of the District the evaluation, ranking and selection of the shortlisted Design-Build

Entities who will receive a Request for Proposals and be invited to submit a Design-Build

Proposal for the Project. The identities of the members of the Evaluation Committee

shall not be disclosed by the District.

4.3.3 Unauthorized Communications, Lobbying. Unless and except as

requested to do so in writing by the District’s Executive Director of Facilities, Design-

Build Entity Members and their Sub-consultants and Subcontractors shall not

communicate, either verbally or in writing, with: (1) any member of the Evaluation

Committee; (2) any consultant or professional retained by the District for the purpose of

providing the District advice or professional services in respect to the Project or the RFQ

or RFP process; (3) any member of the Board of Trustees of the District; (4) any member

of the Chancellor’s Executive Council or (5) any employee or representative of the

District except the District’s Construction Manager responsible for this project. Without

limitation to the foregoing, Applicants are advised that lobbying is not permitted with

any District personnel or members of the Board of Trustees. “Lobbying”, as used herein,

is defined as any action taken by an individual, firm, association, joint venture,

partnership, or corporation seeking to influence the governmental decision of District

personnel or the members of its Board of Trustees on matters related to RFQ or RFP

processes or Award of the Design-Build Contract for the Project. Any such contact

aforementioned could result in the disqualification of the Design-Build Entity.

4.3.4 Notification to Owner of Intent to Submit Response to RFQ. Each

Design Build Entity interested in responding to the RFQ shall notify the District via email

of firm name and contact information in accordance with the RFQ schedule in section

4.2.1, for receipt of any addenda information.

4.3.5 Licensing. Except as otherwise permitted by this Paragraph 4.3.5,

each Design-Build Entity must possess at all times during the RFQ and RFP processes

an active Class B (general contracting) contractor’s license issued by the California

Contractors State Licensing Board that is in good standing. If the Design-Build Entity is

a joint venture consisting of two or more individuals, firms, partnerships, corporations,

associations or other legal entities in which at least one of such joint venture members

holds an active Class B (general contracting) contractor’s license issued by the California

Contractors State Licensing Board that is in good standing, then such Design-Build

Entity shall be entitled, notwithstanding the absence of separate joint venture license, to

respond to the RFQ and to be considered for Award of the Design-Build Contract;

provided, however, that any Design-Build Entity that is selected to receive Award of the

Design-Build Contract must possess, at the time of Award of the Design-Build Contract,

a separate joint venture Class B (general contracting) contractor’s license issued by the

California Contractors State Licensing Board that is in good standing. In addition to the

licensing requirements set forth in this Paragraph 4.3.5 applicable to Applicants, all

persons or entities acting as architects, engineers or subcontractors pursuant to Paragraph

4.3.18, below, shall possess, at the time of submission by the Design-Build Entity of its

Submittal, all licenses required by applicable laws to be issued for the contracting and

performance of the respective professional service and/or trade work.



4.3.6 Skilled Labor Availability. As a part of requirements set forth in

the RFQ Documents, each Design-Build Entity (or its General Contractor, if the Design-

Build Entity is not the General Contractor) and its subcontractors must meet the

minimum requirements for “skilled labor force availability” of California Education

Code Section 81703(c)(2)(F), meaning that an agreement exists with a registered

apprenticeship program, approved by the California Apprenticeship Council, which has

graduated apprentices in each of the immediately preceding five years; provided,

however, that this graduation requirement shall not apply to programs providing

apprenticeship training for any craft that has not been deemed by the Department of

Labor and Department of Industrial Relations to be an apprenticeable craft in the five

years prior to enactment of the act adding California Education Code Section 81703.

Failure to comply with such requirements shall be grounds for disqualification without

further consideration of the Design-Build Entity’s Submittal. If the General Contractor

will not self-perform any, or portions of the work, then the General Contractor may

comply with this requirement by certifying that it will require its subcontractors to

comply.

4.3.7 Public Works Contractor Registration.

.1 Registration. All contractors and subcontractors must be registered

and maintain good standing with the State of California Department of

Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5.

.2 Certification Under Iran Contracting Act of 2010. All contractors

and subcontractors must include a certification in compliance with Public

Contract Code section 2200-2208.

.3 Prohibition Against Bidding or Economic Interest. Pursuant to

California Education Code section 81703(c)(2)(A), participation by a

Design-build entity, its members, subcontractors or sub-consultants in the

development of the pre-proposal criteria documents, programming,

schematic design, Project RFQ or RFP, or any other aspect of pre-proposal

scope of work and services shall render the proposing Design-Build entity

ineligible and disqualified as a proposer for any work on the Project as

Design-Builder.

4.3.8 Submission. Four copies of completed Prequalification

Questionnaire (attachment 2) and Ten copies of the Supplemental Qualifications

Information (attachment 3) and one CD ROM disc or thumb-drive containing all

elements of the Submittal shall be hand delivered to, or received by mail at:


Health Sciences Building, 3rd Floor

Purchasing & Facilities Planning Department


Mission Viejo, CA 92692

Attention: Nawar Al Juburi, Project Manager, Facilities Planning &

Purchasing, Monday through Friday during regular working hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:30



p.m., up to and including, December 1, 2017, 2:00 PM. Facsimiles and emails will not

be accepted. The submittals shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL”. Except as permitted

by Paragraph 4.3.17 (concerning updating of information due to new or changed

circumstances) or as provided in the final sentence of this Paragraph 4.3.7, submissions

after the afore stated deadline will not be considered. The Design-Build Entity assumes

full and sole responsibility for timely receipt of its complete Qualifications Submittal at

the location designated for receipt thereof above. Qualifications Submittals that are

received after the deadline specified in these Instructions to Design-Build Entities shall

be returned, unopened.

4.3.9 Requests for Clarification. The Design-Build Entity is solely

responsible to seek clarification, if needed, of any portion of the Pre-Qualification

Documents. All requests by Design-Build Entities for clarification of the Pre-

Qualification Documents must be submitted in writing, between the hours of 8:00 a.m.

and 4:00 p.m., and no later than November 22, 2017, 2:00 p.m., by hand delivery, mail,

or e-mail to the following:

Nawar Al Juburi, CCM, LEED GA.

Project Manager, Facilities Planning



Mission Viejo, California 92692

P (949) 348-6129

[email protected]

Requests for clarification received after that time will not receive a response. Failure by

a Design-Build Entity to seek clarification of any portion of the RFQ Documents shall

not relieve the Design-Build Entity from its representations as set forth hereinabove nor

serve as the basis for any claim by the Design-Build Entity that it was mistaken or misled

in connection with the preparation of its Submittal in response to the RFQ. Responses to

requests for clarification will be made in writing and distributed to all Design-Build

Entities.

4.3.10 Request for Qualifications Addenda. Interpretations, corrections

and changes by the District of the RFQ Documents will be made by Addendum.

Interpretations, corrections and changes of the RFQ Documents made in any other

manner shall not be relied upon and will not be binding. Notice of issuance of an RFQ

Addendum shall be given only to the Design-Build Entities which have previously

provided the District of Firm name and contact information in accordance with the

instructions of the RFQ. Notice by the District of an RFQ Addendum shall be effective

if by hand delivery, mail or e-mail. The District also anticipates (but shall not be obligated

for) making Addenda available for review on the District Website. Failure of a Design-

Build Entity to receive an RFQ Addendum shall not entitle the Design-Build Entity to an

extension of the Submittal Schedule nor shall it permit the submission of any additional

information after the deadlines set forth in the RFQ Schedule except in those instances

where the District requests information for clarification purposes. The Design-Build

Entities shall confirm, by specifically identifying and listing in its Qualifications

submittal, its receipt of each RFQ addendum. Failure to acknowledge receipt of each and

mailto:[email protected]



all RFQ Addenda may be asserted by the District as a basis for determining RFQ

Submittal package non-responsive.

4.3.11 Applicable Laws. All Submittals in response to this RFQ must be

submitted, filed, made and executed in accordance with applicable laws, whether such

laws are expressly referred to herein or not.

4.3.12 Sealed Envelope. All Submittals in response to this RFQ shall at the

time of delivery be enclosed in a sealed packaging marked “CONFIDENTIAL”. Said

packaging, as well as any other outer envelope or packaging in which said envelope may

have been placed by Design-Build Entity or the carrier for delivery, shall be addressed

and delivered as provided in these Instruction to Design-Build Entities and shall be

clearly and conspicuously labeled with the Design-Build Entity’s name, contact

information and address and an identifying name of the Project and assigned Project

number. The Design-Build Entity assumes full responsibility for timely delivery of its

Design-Build proposal at the location designated. A single copy of the company

financials shall be enclosed in a separate sealed envelope, within the submittal envelope.

The envelope containing the Company Financials shall be labeled with the Design-Build

Entity’s name, contact information and address and an identifying name of the Project,

assigned Project number, and the words, “FINANCIALS - - CONFIDENTIAL.”

4.3.13 Withdrawal, Resubmission. Submittals may be withdrawn at any

time upon written notice to the District at the place for receipt of Qualification

Submittals. Qualification Submittals withdrawn prior to the deadline for receipt thereof

as set forth in the RFQ Schedule may be resubmitted up to the deadline for submission

thereof as provided for in the RFQ Schedule.

4.3.14 Rejection by District. Without limitation to any of the District’s

other rights under the RFQ Documents or applicable laws, the District reserves the right,

exercised in its discretion, to reject any or all Qualifications Submittals that fail to comply

with the requirements of the RFQ Documents or that contain any information that is

untrue or misleading. The District further reserves the right, exercised in its sole and

absolute discretion, to withdraw and cancel this Request for Qualifications (before or

after receipt of Qualifications Submittals) and/or reject all Submittals in response to the

RFQ.

4.3.15 Updated Information. If, due to new or changed circumstances

occurring after the deadline in the RFQ Schedule for submission of Qualifications

Submittals, any information provided by a Design-Build Entity becomes inaccurate, the

Design-Build Entity must immediately notify the District and provide updated accurate

information in writing, under penalty of perjury and signed in the same manner as

required for Qualifications Submittals. The foregoing provision shall not be interpreted

as granting Design-Build Entities the right after the deadline in the RFQ Schedule for

submission of Qualifications Submittals to correct information that was inaccurate or

incomplete at the time the Qualifications Submittals were submitted or to submit any new

information that is for the purpose of, or that would have, the effect of improving upon

or enhancing the responses or other information provided in the Qualifications Submittal.

Consideration of such updated information is in the sole discretion of the District.



4.3.16 General Contractor, Architect of Record, Principal Engineers

and Subcontractors. The Design-Build Entity shall provide all information requested

by the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire and Supplemental Qualifications Requirements

pertinent to the RFQ of the following, whether or not they are expressly Design-Build

Entity Members: General Contractor, Architect of Record, Principal Structural Engineer,

Principal Civil Engineer, other Consulting Engineers as appropriate to your team and

Subcontractors in the following trades: mechanical and electrical and others as

appropriate.

4.3.17 References. The District reserves the right, but assumes no

obligation, to conduct interviews of references provided by Design-Build Entities in its

Qualifications Submittal. Whether or not the District elects to conduct interviews, the

District assumes no responsibility to determine the accuracy of references provided in

the Qualifications Submittals, including, without limitation, contacting or interviewing

references and other sources available. If contacted, each reference will be asked identical

questions from a list of questions pre-prepared by the District. It is the Design-Build

Entity’s responsibility to verify the accuracy, and present only current contact

information, for all such references. The District also reserves the right to contact other

known references, whether or not listed by the Design-Build Entity, in the same manner

described above.

4.3.18 Subsequent Information. The District reserves the right, in its

discretion, to adjust (by increasing or decreasing), limit, suspend or rescind the Pre-

Qualification scoring or ranking of a Design-Build Entity or disqualify a Design-Build

Entity based on subsequently learned information that the District determines could have

adversely affected the scoring or ranking of the Design-Build Entity if such information

had been included in the Design-Build Entity’s Pre-Qualification Questionnaire or

Qualifications Submittal. Without limitation, the foregoing, in the event that as a result

of such subsequently learned information the scoring and rank of a Design-Build Entity

that is the subject of the such information is changed such that it is thereafter ranked

lower than a competing, previously lower-ranked Design-Build Entity, then the District

shall have the right, but not the obligation, to extend an invitation to participate in the

RFP process to such previously lower-ranked Design-Build Entity (or, if such Design-

Build Entity declines the invitation, to extend an invitation to the next in order of the

previously lower-ranked Design-Build Entity whose rank, after such adjustment, is above

the rank of the Design-Build Entity who was the subject of such information).

4.3.19 Clarification of Submittals. The District reserves the right at any

time to request in writing from any or all Design-Build Entities clarification of any

information contained in a RFQ submittal. Nothing stated herein or elsewhere in the RFQ

documents shall be interpreted as obligating the District to request further clarification

from any Design-Build Entity or as obligating the District to seek the same or similar

clarification from other or all Design-Build Entities. Requests for clarification shall be

responded to by the Design-Build Entity to whom it is directed within three (3) days after

the date of receipt thereof by the Design-Build Entity in the same manner and to the same

location as provided in delivery requirements herein. Responses to such requests by the

District shall be limited to clarifying the portion of the submittal described in the

District’s request. Responses shall not include changes to a RFQ submittal. Information



provided in a response to a request for clarification that does not comply with the

requirements of this paragraph will not be considered.

4.3.20 Waiver of Irregularities. The District reserves the right to waive

minor or clerical irregularities, errors or omissions in the information contained in any

Qualifications Submittal or in regard to any Design-Build Entity’s compliance with RFQ

process, and to make all final determinations with respect to the information provided in

any Qualifications Submittal.

4.3.21 Costs and Expenses. Design-Build Entities shall bear, at their own

expense and without reimbursement by the District, all costs and expenses associated

with their participation in the RFQ process and if selected of responding to the Request

for Proposals for the Project.

4.3.22 Notices. Notices by the District to Design-Build Entities issued after

the deadline in the RFQ Schedule for submission of Qualifications Submittals shall be

deemed delivered and received by the Design-Build Entity if provided by delivery, mail,

facsimile or e-mail to the Design-Build Entity at the address provided by the Design-

Build Entity as required by date identified in the schedule section of this RFQ or at the

address set forth in Section I, Part A of the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire for the

“Contact Person” for the Design-Build Entity.

ARTICLE 5

SCORING AND RANKING OF DESIGN-BUILD ENTITIES

5.1 INITIAL SCORING AND RANKING

5.1.1 Pre-Qualification. The scoring and ranking of the RFQ Design-Build Entities

will be based on the following sections of the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire:

Part II -- Essential Requirements for the Design-Build Entity; and

Part III – Team Member Questions;

Each member of the Design-Build Entity must meet the minimum qualifying score

for their portion of the Pre-Qualification questionnaire in order for the Design-Build Entity

to be considered further for potential shortlisting for invitation to receive the Request for

Proposal. The District reserves the right to request members of the Design-Build Entity that

do not qualify to be removed from a project team.

5.1.2 Supplemental Qualifications Requirements. The selection committee will

review, score and rank the additional requested qualifications requirements

(Attachment 3) response including proposed project personnel, representative

projects completed, references and past examples of target value design,

collaboration and Lean practices on past projects.

5.1.3 Short List. Those Design-Build Entities who are not disqualified (based on

either their failing to achieve minimum passing scores in Part II and III of their responses to

the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire or on other grounds for disqualification set forth in the



RFQ Documents) will then be ranked by the Evaluation Committee based on the scores

received from the review of the Supplemental Qualifications Requirements submittal. The

most qualified Design-Build Entities will be invited pursuant to the “short-listing” process

described in Paragraph 2.2.2, above, to participate in Interviews at the option of the

Evaluation Committee. If the District chooses to forego the interview process, the top-ranked

Design-Build Entities will then be invited to stage 2, the Request for Proposal process.

5.1.4 Interviews. If the District selects a short list of Design-Build Entities for

invitations to interview with the Evaluation Committee, interviews will be face-to-face

confidential exchanges between a Design-Build Entity and the Evaluation Committee for the

purpose of clarifying their Qualifications submittal and introducing their proposed team

members to assure a full understanding of, and responsiveness to the requirements of the

RFQ documents and to discuss any perceived weaknesses or deficiencies. Interviews will be

held after the scoring of the RFQ submittal and pursuant to the schedule in Section 4.2.1.

The top-ranked Design-Build Entities as a result of the scoring of the Interviews will then be

invited to stage 2, the Request for Proposal process

5.1.5 Perceived Weaknesses and Deficiencies in Submittals. Interviews may

include addressing perceived weakness or deficiencies in the RFQ submittal of the Design-

Build Entities with whom such Interviews are conducted. However, the District assumes no

obligation as part of the Interviews to address or discuss any or all weaknesses, errors,

omissions or other matters in the RFQ submittal, whether observed or not observed by the

District or the Evaluation Committee, and all such weakness or deficiencies, whether

observed, not observed, discussed or not discussed, remain the sole responsibility of the

Design-Build Entity.

5.1.6 Additional Interviews. In the event that any of the Design-Build Entities to

whom an Interview invitation was issued fails to attend the Interview, the District may, if it

determines that it is in its best interest to do so, invite one or more of the other Pre-Qualified

Design-Build Entities ranked next highest in order according to the scoring conducted during

the RFQ process to attend an interview in its place.

5.1.7 Scores Not Carried Forward. Scoring from this Request For Pre-

Qualification will not be carried forward as a factor in scoring Design-Build Proposals

submitted in response to the RFP process by Pre-Qualified Design-Build Entities on the

“short -list” of Design-Build Entities.

5.2 Selection. The District will convene the Evaluation Committee and brief all

members on the scope of the project and the services required. The Committee will discuss the

requirements of the project and attributes of the Design-Build procurement method.

`

5.2.1 Initial Screening. The Pre-Qualification Questionnaire for each Design-

Build Entity will be evaluated and scored against the published criteria for pre-qualification.

Each proposed member of the Design-Build Entity including the General Contractor,

Architect, Design Engineers and Specialty Trade Subcontractors must meet the minimum

qualifying score in order for the team to pass the pre-qualification threshold. Those teams

that pass the pre-qualification threshold will proceed to the next stage of evaluation of their

Additional Qualifications Submittal. The Evaluation Committee will objectively evaluate

each firm's abilities in accordance with the criteria stated in each scored section. The District



reserves the right to request members of the Design-Build Entity that do not qualify to be

removed from a project team

5.2.2 The Evaluation Committee will determine the preliminary ranking of the

firms under consideration based on the above scoring factors and select three (3) or more

firms with the highest ranking to present in-person interviews.

.1 The Evaluation Committee will discuss and decide what topics

should be covered based on the preliminary topics listed below. A date and time for

the interviews shall be determined.

.2 Request for interview: A formal letter of request will be

prepared by the District. The District may advise each firm by phone or email of the

interview schedule and follow up with the formal letter of request. The District will

schedule a suitable room for the Committee and the selected firms. The Design-Build

Entity will furnish visual aids, if any.

.3 Scoring of Interview. Interviews will be conducted in person.

The Design-Build Entity shall include on their interview team, at a minimum, the

following individuals:

General Contractor - Executive in charge of Project

Project Manager for the Project

Superintendent for the Project

Architect - Principal in charge of the Project

Lead Designer/Project Manager for the Project

Engineers - Engineer for the Project for respective

engineering disciplines as defined in the

Questionnaire.

Possible Criteria to be scored during oral interviews by the Evaluation

Committee:

a) Project Team – team member competence, qualifications, ability, and

demonstration of teamwork, collaboration, and communications.

b) Experience and Ability – demonstrated experience and ability to

implement the project as proposed.

c) Approach and Methodology – ability to meet the schedule, confidence

in quality of project, and an established successful collaborative

design and project execution process,

d) Target Value Design – description and examples of past projects using

Target Value Design with clearly described project processes for set-

based design, target costing, and project outcomes relative to the

defined value proposition.



e) Project Commitment – discussion of Design-Build Entity’s current

project backlog and how proposed project team members

availabilities are in line with the proposed project scheduled.

5.3 Selection Recommendation. Based on any or all of the above, the Committee will score

and rank the Design-Build Entities and proceed with the three highest ranked firms, unless the

District, as deemed to be in its best interest, chooses to proceed with more or less than the three

highest ranked firms.

ARTICLE 6

NOTICE OF APPEAL OF DISTRICT DECISION

6.1 Notice of Selection. The District will issue a Notice of Selection of shortlisted Design-Build

Entities in accordance with the RFQ Schedule to all Design-Build Entities who have completed and

submitted Qualifications Submittals. Such Notice may, or may not, include a statement of the final

ranking of the Design-Build Entities; however, information on the ranking of Design-Build Entities

will be made available during debriefings.

6.2 Debriefing. After the issuance of the Notice of Selection of shortlisted Design-Build

Entities, the District will make available, for those requesting it, an opportunity for a debriefing.

Debriefings will be conducted in accordance with the RFQ Schedule. At the debriefing, summaries

of the scoring and ranking of Applicant’s own Qualifications Submittals will be reviewed. Copies

of Qualifications Submittals and evaluating worksheets will not be provided nor will there be point-

by-point comparisons of competing -Qualifications Submittals. Debriefings shall not include

disclosure of any information prohibited from disclosure by applicable laws or exempt from release

under applicable laws pertaining to release of public records, including, without limitation

information constituting trade secrets or other proprietary information.

6.3 APPEAL of District Decision. Any Design-Build Entity submitting a Qualifications

Submittal to the District may file an appeal of the District's decision in its Notice of Selection of

Shortlisted Design-Build Entities, provided that each and all of the following are complied with:

i. the appeal is in writing;

ii. the appeal is filed and received by the Executive Director of Facilities

Planning and Purchasing not more than five (5) Calendar Days following the

date of issuance of the District's Notice of Selection of Shortlisted Design-

Build Entities;

iii. the written appeal sets forth, in detail, all grounds for the appeal, including

without limitation all facts, supporting documentation, legal authorities and

argument in support of the grounds for the appeal. Any matters not set forth

in the written appeal shall be deemed waived. All factual contentions must

be supported by competent, admissible and credible evidence.

6.3.1 Failure to Comply. Any appeal not conforming to, or not submitted within

the time period required by, this Section 6.3 may be rejected as invalid.



6.3.2 Review and Decision. The Executive Director of Facilities Planning and

Purchasing in his/her discretion shall review and evaluate the basis of the appeal and shall

provide a written decision to the Design-Build Entity submitting the appeal concurring with

or denying the appeal. The written decision of the Executive Director of Facilities Planning

and Purchasing shall be final.

6.3.3 Superseding Procedures. The provisions of this Section 6.3 supersede and

are in lieu of the provisions for appeal as may be otherwise established by the District

pertaining to pre-qualification of contractors for competitive bidding of construction

contracts.

ARTICLE 7

ATTACHMENTS

The following Attachments are attached hereto and incorporated as part of the Pre-

Qualification Documents by this reference:

ATTACHMENT NO. 1: SADDLEBACK COLLEGE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND

APPLIED SCIENCES BUILDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PROGRAM SUMMARY AND

SITE MAPS

ATTACHMENT NO. 2: PREQUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT NO. 3 : SUPPLEMENTAL QUALIFICATIONS INFORMATION

ATTACHMENT NO. 4: PRELIMINARY DRAFT PROJECT SCHEDULE

ATTACHMENT NO. 5: SAMPLE DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACT

END OF INSTRUCTIONS


RFQ – Saddleback College ATAS Building Project

Page 1 of 4

ATTACHMENT NO. 1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PROGRAM SUMMARY AND SITE MAP

1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Saddleback Community College Advanced Technology and Applied Science (ATAS)

Building (“Project”) consists of the following components:

Phase 1: A new 45,000 G.S.F., Design-Build, LEED Gold equivalent, two-story building

serving Architecture, Drafting, Electronics, Environmental Studies, Graphics Design,

Horticulture, associated labs, conference rooms, administration and faculty offices. This new

building will be constructed at the existing Saddleback College tennis courts.

Phase 2: New tennis courts facility consisting of eight courts, restrooms, and locker rooms

at a new campus location. Note that the final location will be determined during the Criteria

and Programming Phase.

Phase 3: A proposed surface parking lot encompassing an estimated 54,000 square foot area,

with an estimated 100 -150 parking spaces with site lighting. The proposed parking lot will

be constructed at the current location of the existing TAS Building and the Automotive Yard.

This phase will commence after the abatement and demolition of the existing TAS Building.

Sequencing of the Phases is negotiable.



Page 2 of 4

2.0 PROGRAM SUMMARY (DRAFT)



Page 3 of 4



Page 4 of 4

3.0 SITE MAP

Location of Site: The Project site is located at 28000 Marguerite Parkway, Mission Viejo,

CA 92692.

South Orange County Community College District Page 1 of 86 Advanced Technology and Applied Science (ATAS) Building Project 10/31/17

ATTACHMENT NO. 2

PRE-QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN-BUILD

FOR

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED

SCIENCE (ATAS) BUILDING PROJECT

AT

Saddleback College

SOCCCD PROJECT No. – 358D

October 31, 2017


Table of Contents

I. INFORMATION ABOUT DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY MEMBERS .................................................................. 4

A. Contact Information ........................................................................................................................ 4

B. Design-Build Entity Members .......................................................................................................... 5

C. Information about the General Contractor ..................................................................................... 6

D. Information about the Architect of Record .................................................................................. 10

E. Information about the Structural Engineer.................................................................................. 13

F. Information about the Civil Engineer ........................................................................................... 16

G. Information about Other Design Professionals or Engineers ...................................................... 19

H. Information about the Electrical Subcontractor .......................................................................... 22

I. Information about the Mechanical Subcontractor ...................................................................... 26

J. Information about Other Subcontractor ...................................................................................... 30

II. ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY ............................................................ 34 General Contractor:........................................................................................................................................ 37

Architect: ........................................................................................................................................................ 37

SECTION II. SCORING MATRIX: ....................................................................................................................... 39

III. TEAM MEMBER QUESTIONS ............................................................................................................. 40

A. Team Member Questions for the General Contractor ................................................................. 40

B. Team Member Questions for the Architect of Record ................................................................. 49

C. Team Member Questions for the Structural Engineer ................................................................. 53

D. Team Member Questions for the Civil Engineer ........................................................................... 57

E. Team Member Questions for Other Design Professional or Engineer .......................................... 61

F. Scored Questions for the Pre-Qualification of the ElectricalSubcontractor ................................. 65

G. Scored Questions for the Pre-Qualification of the Mechanical Subcontractor ............................. 72


H. Scored Questions for the Pre-Qualification of Other Subcontractor .. 79

IV. CERTIFICATION .................................................................................................................................. 86


I. INFORMATION ABOUT DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY MEMBERS

This section must be completed, but will not be scored

A. Contact Information

General Contractor Name:

Architect of Record Name:

Design-Build Entity Contact Person:

Design-Build Entity Address:

Phone: Fax

Email:


B. Design-Build Entity Members

List the following individuals and legal entities that are Design-Build Entity Members of the Design-

Build Entity.

Discipline Name Legal Entity (i.e. corporation, partnership, sole proprietor, etc.)

General Contractor

Architect of Record

Structural Engineer

Civil Engineer

Other Engineer(s)

Electrical Subcontractor(s)

Mechanical Subcontractor(s)

Other Subcontractor(s)

For each Design-Build Member listed above that is not a sole proprietorship or corporation (such as,

but not limited to, a partnership company or other association or legal entity), please provide a

copy of the agreement creating the partnership or other association.


C. Information about the General Contractor

Definitions:

“General Contractor” shall mean the general contractor, holding a current, valid, Class “B”

general contractor’s license in good standing, that will assume responsibility for the

subcontracting, management, supervision and administration of the construction for the

Project.

Provide the following information about the General Contractor for which pre-qualification is being

requested by the Design-Build Entity. If the Design-Build Entity is itself the General Contractor for

which pre-qualification is being requested by the Design-Build Entity, then provide all information

requested as it relates to the Design-Build Entity itself.

1. Name of General Contractor:

2. Date of company formation or incorporation:

3. State of formation or incorporation:

4. How many persons does the General Contractor currently employ?

5(a) If the General Contractor is a corporation, provide the following:

Provide information for each officer of the corporation.

Position Name Years with Co.

% Ownership

CEO

President

Secretary

Treasurer/CFO

Other (Title)


5(b) If the General Contractor is an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, please

complete the following:

Owner Years as Owner

5(c) If the General Contractor is a joint venture, partnership or other association or legal

entity, provide the following for each member of the joint venture, each partner or other

association member. (Attach additional pages if necessary)

Name of Individual or Entity

Principal Contact Position Years with Joint Venture/ Partnership/ Other Entity

% Ownership Interest

If “yes,” explain on a separate page.

6. Has there been any change in ownership of the General Contractor during the last three years?

(NOTE: A corporation whose shares are publicly traded is not required to answer this question with regard to public trades.)

Yes No


7. Is the General Contractor a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another construction firm?

(NOTE: Include information about other firms if one firm owns 50 percent or more of another, or if an owner, partner, or officer of your firm holds a similar position in another firm.)

Yes No


8 State the General Contractor’s gross revenues for each of the last three years:

2016 $ 2015 $ 2014 $

9. List all California contractor license numbers, classifications and expiration dates currently held by the General Contractor in the last five years, include DIR Registration Number:

License Number Trade Classification Date Issued Expiration Date

The contract shall not be awarded unless the District has verified that the contractor has a valid license in the appropriate classification for the work performed. Any bidder or contractor not so licensed shall be subject to all legal penalties imposed by law, including, but not limited to, any appropriate disciplinary action by the Contractors State License Board.

10. Has the General Contractor changed names or license numbers in the past five years?

Yes No


11. Has any owner, California State Contractor’s License Board (CSCLB) qualifier or corporate officer of the General Contractor operated as a contractor under any other name or license number (not listed in 9 above) in the last five years?

Yes No



12. Surety Information for General Contractor: (Surety must have a Best Rating of A or better)

Bonding Co. / Surety:

Surety Agent:

Agent Address:

Telephone No.:

13. List all other sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for the General Contractor during the last five years, including periods during which each wrote the bonds:

Surety Address Periods of

Coverage


D. Information about the Architect of Record

Definitions:

“Architect of Record” means the licensed architect whose stamp will appear on Project Construction Documents.

“Firm” means, in the case where the Architect of Record is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Architect of Record.

1. Provide the following information:

Name:

License Number:

Years in Practice:

2. If the Architect of Record or its Firm is different from that of the General Contractor, please answer the following:

2(a) Date of company formation or incorporation:

2(b) State of formation or incorporation:

2(c) How many persons does the Architect of Record or its Firm currently employ?

2(d) If the Architect of Record’s Firm is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation.


% Ownership

CEO

President

Secretary

Treasurer/CFO


2(e) If the Architect of Record is an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, complete the following:


2(f) If the Architect of Record’s Firm is a joint venture, partnership or other association (other than a corporation), provide the following information for each member of the joint venture, each partner or each other association member. (Attach additional pages if necessary)


Principal Contact Position Years with Joint Venture/ Partnership/ Other Association


2(g) Has there been any change in ownership of the Architect of Record’s Firm during the last three years?


Yes No



2(h) Is the Architect of Record’s Firm a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another firm?

(NOTE: Include information about other firms if one firm owns 50 percent or more of another, or if an owner, partner, or officer of the Firm holds a similar position in another firm.)

Yes No


2(i). Has any corporate officer or owner of any Architect’s firm, worked for any other architectural firms in the past five years?

NOTE: Include information about other firms if an owner, partner, or officer in your firm holds a similar position in another firm.)

Yes No

2(j) Has the Architect of Record’s Firm changed names, corporate officers or owners in the past five years?

Yes No

If “yes,” explain on a separate page including reason for change.

2(k). Provide the following information for all known Architects who will be designing the project: (Attach additional pages if necessary)

Architect License Number Years in Practice


E. Information about the Structural Engineer

Definitions:

“Structural Engineer” means the professional(s) providing professional services in the discipline of structural engineering, also known as a Principal Engineer.

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Structural Engineer is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Structural Engineer.


Firm Name:

Managing Principal:

License Number:

Engineering Discipline: __________________________________________________________

Years in Practice:

2. If the firm of the Principal Engineer is different from that of the General Contractor or Architect of Record, please answer the following:



2(c) How many persons does the Engineer’s Firm currently employ?

2(d) If the Structural Engineer’s firm is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation and individuals who own 10% or more of the corporate stock.


% Ownership

CEO

President

Secretary


Treasurer

2(e) If the Structural Engineer is an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, complete the following:


2(f) If the Structural Engineer’s firm is a joint venture, partnership or other association (other than a corporation), provide the following information for each member of the joint venture, each partner or each other association member.




2(g) Has there been any change in ownership of the Structural Engineer’s Firm during the last three years?


Yes No



2(h) Is the Structural Engineer’s Firm a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another firm?

(NOTE: Include information about other firms if one firm owns 50 percent or more of another, or if an owner, partner, or officer of your Firm holds a similar position in another firm.)

Yes No


2(i). Has the Structural Engineer’s firm changed names, corporate officers or owners in the past five years?

Yes No



F. Information about the Civil Engineer

Definitions:

“Civil Engineer” means the professional(s) providing professional services in the discipline of civil engineering, also known as a Principal Engineer.

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Civil Engineer is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Civil Engineer.


Firm Name:

Managing Principal:

License Number:


Years in Practice:





2(d) If the Civil Engineer’s firm is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation and individuals who own 10% or more of the corporate stock.


% Ownership

CEO

President


Secretary

Treasurer

2(e) If the Civil Engineer is an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, complete the following:


2(f) If the Civil Engineer’s firm is a joint venture, partnership or other association (other than a corporation), provide the following information for each member of the joint venture, each partner or each other association member.




2(g) Has there been any change in ownership of the Civil Engineer’s Firm during the last three years?


Yes No



2(h) Is the Civil Engineer’s Firm a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another firm?


Yes No


2(i). Has the Civil Engineer’s firm changed names, corporate officers or owners in the past five years?

Yes No



G. Information about Other Design Professionals or Engineers

This form should be used for the sports complex design professional and other design disciplines necessary for the project including electrical engineering and mechanical engineering if not provided as a part of the electrical or mechanical contractor’s in-house services. Definitions:

“Other Engineer” means the professional(s) providing professional services in the discipline of engineering or design, also known as a Principal Engineer or designer.

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Engineer is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Engineer.


Firm Name:

Managing Principal:

License Number:


Years in Practice:





2(d) If the Engineer’s firm is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation and individuals who own 10% or more of the corporate stock.


% Ownership

CEO


President

Secretary

Treasurer

2(e) If the Engineer is an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, complete the following:


2(f) If the Engineer’s firm is a joint venture, partnership or other association (other than a corporation), provide the following information for each member of the joint venture, each partner or each other association member.




2(g) Has there been any change in ownership of the l Engineer’s Firm during the last three years?


Yes No



2(h) Is the Engineer’s Firm a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another firm?


Yes No


2(i). Has the Engineer’s firm changed names, corporate officers or owners in the past five years?

Yes No



H. Information about the Electrical Subcontractor

1. Name of Electrical Subcontractor:



4. How many persons does the Electrical Subcontractor currently employ?

5(a) If the Electrical Subcontractor is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation and individuals who own 10% or more of the corporate stock.


% Ownership

CEO

President

Secretary

Treasurer

5(b) If the Electrical Subcontractor is a sole proprietorship, complete the following:



5(c) If the Electrical Subcontractor is a joint venture, partnership or other legal entity, provide the following information for each member of the joint venture or each partner:


Principal Contact Position Years with Joint Venture/ Partnership/ Entity


6. Has there been any change in ownership of the Electrical Subcontractor during the last three years?


Yes No


7. Is the Electrical Subcontractor a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another construction firm?


Yes No


8. State the Electrical Subcontractor’s gross revenues for each of the last three years: 2016 $ 2015 $ 2014$


9. List all California contractor license numbers, classifications and expiration dates currentlyheld by the Electrical Subcontractor, Include DIR registration number:

License Number Classification Date Issued Expiration Date

10. Has the Electrical Subcontractor changed names, corporate officers, owners or license numbersin the past five years?

Yes No

If “yes,” explain: on a separate page.

11. Has any owner, CSLB qualifier or corporate officer of the Electrical Subcontractor operated as acontractor under any other name or license number (not listed in 9 above) in the last five years?

Yes No


12. Surety Information for Electrical Subcontractor:

Bonding Co./Surety:

Surety Agent:

Agent Address:

Telephone No.:


13. List all other sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for your firm during the last five years, including the periods during which each wrote the bonds:

Surety Address Periods of Coverage

14. Attach a copy of the Project Manager/Superintendent’s resume. Include resumes for any members from the firm that will be associated with this project.


I. Information about the Mechanical Subcontractor

1. Name of Mechanical Subcontractor:



4. How many persons does the Mechanical Subcontractorcurrently employ?

5(a) If the Mechanical Subcontractor is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation and individuals who own 10% or more of the corporate stock.


% Ownership

CEO

President

Secretary

Treasurer

5(b) If the Mechanical Subcontractor is a sole proprietorship, complete the following:


5(c) If the Mechanical Subcontractor is a joint venture, partnership or other legal entity, provide the following information for each member of the joint venture or each partner.





6. Has there been any change in ownership of the Mechanical Subcontractor during the last three years?


Yes No


7. Is the Mechanical Subcontractor a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another construction firm?


Yes No


8. State the Mechanical Subcontractor’s gross revenues for each of the last three years:

2016 $ 2015 $ 2014 $


9. List all California contractor license numbers, classifications and expiration dates currently held by the Mechanical Subcontractor, include DIR registration number:


10. Has the Mechanical Subcontractor changed names, corporate officers, owners or license numbers in the past five years?

Yes No


11. Has any owner, CSLB qualifier or corporate officer of the Mechanical Subcontractor operated as a contractor under any other name or license number (not listed in 9 above) in the last five years?

Yes No


12. Surety Information for Mechanical Subcontractor

Bonding Co./Surety:

Surety Agent:

Agent Address:

Telephone No.:


13. List all other sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for your firm during the last five years, including the dates during which each wrote the bonds:

Surety Address Dates



J. Information about Other Subcontractor This form should be used for any trade contractors that the Design-Build Entity believes would specifically add significant value during the design process.

1. Name of Subcontractor:

2. Scope of work to be performed: ____________________________



5. How many persons does the Subcontractor currently employ?

5(a) If the Subcontractor is a corporation, provide the following information for each officer of the corporation and individuals who own 10% or more of the corporate stock.


% Ownership

CEO

President

Secretary

Treasurer

5(b) If the Subcontractor is a sole proprietorship, complete the following:



5(c) If the Subcontractor is a joint venture, partnership or other legal entity, provide the following information for each member of the joint venture or each partner.




6. Has there been any change in ownership of the Subcontractor during the last three years?


Yes No


7. Is the Subcontractor a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another construction firm?


Yes No


8. State the Subcontractor’s gross revenues for each of the last three years:

2016 $ 2015 $ 2014 $


9. List all California contractor license numbers, classifications and expiration dates currently held by the Subcontractor, include DIR registration number:


10. 10.

Has the Subcontractor changed names, corporate officers, owners or license numbers in the past five years?

Yes No


11. 11.

Has any owner, CSLB qualifier or corporate officer of the Subcontractor operated as a contractor under any other name or license number (not listed in 9 above) in the last five years?

Yes No


12. Surety Information for Subcontractor

Bonding Co./Surety:

Surety Agent:

Agent Address:

Telephone No.:


13. List all other sureties (name and full address) that have written bonds for your firm during the last five years, including the dates during which each wrote the bonds:

Surety Address Dates



II. ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY

This Section II is the first step in scoring the Design-Build Entity. It seeks information about various members of the Design-Build Entity, and consists of questions that must be answered correctly (per the table at the end of this Section) or the Design-Build Entity will be disqualified.

Definitions:

● The term “Design-Build Entity” as used in this Section II means Design-Build Entities wishing to be considered for receipt of the District’s Request for Proposal for the design and construction of the Project. All requested information within this Section II must be attributable to the corporation, company, limited partnership, partnership, or other association or legal entity of the Design-Build Entity which would ultimately contract with the District and not any parent, subsidiary or associated entity which would not be a signatory to the ultimate contract with the District unless otherwise provided herein.

The term “Associates” as used in this Section II means any of the following:

-The current qualifiers for all current Contractors State License Board contracting licenses held by the General Contractor (or, Design-Build Entity Member where the question asks about a Design- Build Entity Member).

-All current officers of the General Contractor (or, Design-Build Entity Member where the question asks about a Design-Build Entity Member), if it is a corporation.

-All current partners of the General Contractor (or, Design-Build Entity Member where the question asks about a Design-Build Entity Member), if it is a partnership.

-All current joint venture members of the Design-Build Entity, if it is a joint venture.

1. Does the General Contractor possess a current California contractor’s license for the Project for

which it intends to submit a proposal?

Yes No


2. Does the General Contractor have a general liability insurance policy with a policy limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate?

Yes No

If yes, provide the following information. (Attach a separate page if more than one policy.)

Insurance Company

Policy Number

Policy limit per occurrence

Aggregate policy limit

3. Does the General Contractor have a current workers’ compensation insurance policy as required by the State of California, or are legally self-insured?

Yes No

If yes, provide the following information. (Attach a separate page if more than one policy)

Insured

Carrier

Policy Number

4. Has a copy of an audited financial statement (no more than two years old) with accompanying notes been attached for the General Contractor? (An audited financial statement with accompanying notes of a parent company guarantor may be substituted. A financial statement that is not audited is not acceptable. A letter verifying availability of a line of credit is not a substitute for the required financial statement.)

Yes No


5. Has a notarized statement from an admitted surety insurer (approved by the California Department of Insurance) and authorized to issue bonds in the State of California been attached, which states that the General Contractor’s current bonding capacity is sufficient for the project for which you seek pre-qualification? (Statement must be from the surety company, not an agent or broker.)

Yes No

6. Has any contractor license held by the General Contractor or any of its Associates been revoked or suspended, without a successful appeal for reinstatement, within the last five (5) years?

Yes No

7. Has a surety firm completed a contract or paid for completion of a contract on behalf of any Design-Build Entity Member because of default within the last five (5) years?

Yes No

8. Within the last five years was the General Contractor or any proposed Subcontractor declared ineligible to bid on a public works contract, to be awarded a public works contract, or to perform as a subcontractor on a public works contract, pursuant to either Labor Code section 1777.1 or Labor Code section 1777.7? Yes No

9. Has any Design-Build Entity Member or any of their employees (contractors, architects, engineers) or any member’s Associates, ever been convicted of a crime involving the awarding of a contract for a government project, or the bidding or performance of a government contract within the last five (5) years?

Yes No

10. Do all architects and engineers of record who are expected to work on the project possess current California professional licenses for the services which they intend to provide?

Yes No


11. Is the General Contractor or Architect of Record covered by professional liability insurance policies with a policy limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 in the aggregate for work on a design-build contract?

Yes No

If yes, provide the names of the insurance companies, policy numbers, and policy limits.

General Contractor:

Insurance Company

Policy Number



Architect:

Insurance Company

Policy Number




12. Are all Principal Engineers covered by a professional liability insurance policy with a policy limit of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and $5,000,000 aggregate for work on a design-build contract?

Yes No

If yes, provide the name of the insurance company, policy number, and policy limits. (Attach a separate page if more than one policy.)

Insurance Company

Policy Number



13. Has any professional license held by any architect who will provide services been revoked at any time in the last five years?

Yes No

14. Has any professional license held by any Engineer who will provide services been revoked at any time in the last five years?

Yes No

15. Does the General Contractor and each proposed Subcontractor seeking prequalification, know and understand their obligations regarding the employment of apprentices on public works under Labor Code section 1777.5 and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 230.1, and do they intend to comply with these requirements, including the requirement, if applicable, to request the dispatch of apprentices from an apprenticeship program approved by the California Apprenticeship Council?

Yes No


SECTION II. SCORING MATRIX:

QUESTION NUMBER YES NO SCORE 1 0 1

2 0 1

3 0 1

4 0 1

5 0 1

6 1 0

7 1 0

8 1 0

9 1 0

10 0 1

11 0 1

12 0 1

13 1 0

14 1 0 15 0 1 TOTAL *

* Disqualified if score is greater than zero (0)


III. TEAM MEMBER QUESTIONS

A. Team Member Questions for the General Contractor

Each of the following Questions shall be scored.

Total points available: 225 (must score 185 to prequalify)

Definitions:

● The term “Associates” as used in this Part A means all of the following:

-The current qualifiers for all current Contractors State License Board contracting licenses held by the General Contractor.

-All current officers of the General Contractor if it is a corporation.

-All current partners of the General Contractor if it is a partnership.

-All current joint venture members if it is a joint venture.

Please answer the following questions as indicated:

General

A-1. How many years has the General Contractor been licensed in California?

Years:

Financial ability to perform the work required

A-2. Is the General Contractor or any of its Associates currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No

If “yes,” indicate case number, bankruptcy court, and the date on which the petition was filed.


Case Number Bankruptcy Court Date Filed

A-3. Was the General Contractor or any of its Associates in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question A-2, above)

Yes No

If “yes,” indicate the case number, bankruptcy court, and the date on which the petition was filed.


A-4. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for the General Contractor or any of its Associates due to non-payment or contractor losses?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page give name of the insured, name the insurance carrier, the form of insurance, and the year of the refusal.

A-5. Please fill in the following blanks based on the General Contractor’s attached financial statement:

Current Assets: $ Current Liabilities: $ Total Net Worth: $ _ Current Ratio (Assets/Liabilities): Working Capital (Current Assets - Current Liabilities): $

History of Performance

A-6. At any time in the last five years has the General Contractor or its associates been assessed liquidated damages or more than $50,000 on a construction contract with either a public or private owner?

Yes No


A-7. Has the General Contractor or any of its Associates ever defaulted on a construction contract?

Yes No


A-8. In the last five years has the General Contractor or any of its Associates, been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No

If “yes,” explain on a separate page. State the name of the organization debarred, the year of the event, the owner of the project, and the basis for the action.

A-9. Has the General Contractor or any of its Associates ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page identify the year of the event, the entity denied the award, the owner, the project, and the basis for the finding by the public agency.

(NOTE: The following two questions refer only to disputes between contractors and owners of projects. You need not include information about disputes with suppliers, other contractors, or subcontractors. You need not include information about “pass-through” disputes in which the actual dispute is between a subcontractor and a project owner.)

A-10. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against

the General Contractor or any of its Associates concerning their work on a construction project?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, the name of the entity the claim was filed against, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court and case number, and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending or, if resolved, a brief description of the resolution).


A-11. In the past five years has the General Contractor or any of its Associates made any claim in excess of $10,000 against a project owner concerning work on a project or payment for a contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page identify the claim by providing the name of claimant, the project name, date of the claim, name of the entity (or entities) against whom the claim was filed, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court and case number, and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending, or if resolved, a brief description of the resolution).

A-12. Has the General Contractor or any of its Associates (or any manager of an Associate if the

Associate is not a person) ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public entity?

Yes No

If “yes,” explain on a separate page, including identifying who was found liable or guilty, the court and case number, the name of the public entity, the civil or criminal verdict, the date and the basis for the finding.

A-13. Has the General Contractor or its associates ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?

Yes No

If “yes”, explain on a separate page, including identifying who was convicted, the name of the victim, the date of the conviction, the court and case number, the crimes, and the grounds for conviction.

A-14. Has the General Contractor or its associates ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?

Yes No

If “yes”, identify on a separate page, the person or persons convicted, the court and case number, the crimes, and the year convicted.


A-15. During the last five years, has there ever been a period of time when the General Contractor or its associates had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required?

Yes No

If “yes”, indicate the period during which no surety bonds were in place, name of entity without the surety bond, the name of project owner, and if coverage was denied the date coverage was denied and the name of the company that denied coverage.

A-16. If the General Contractor operates its own State-approved apprenticeship program, provide the following information on a separate page:

(a) Identify the craft or crafts in which you provided apprenticeship training in the past year.

(b) State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s).

(c) State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm.

A-17. At any time during the last five years, has the General Contractor or its associates been found to have violated any provision of the California apprenticeship law or regulations, or the law pertaining to use of apprentices on public works?

Yes No

If “yes”, provide the date of the findings and attach a copy of the final decision.

___________________________________________________________________

Date of Findings


A-18. Do agreements exist between the General Contractor and registered apprenticeship programs which have been approved by the California Apprenticeship Council and have graduated apprentices in the preceding five years, for all apprenticable crafts which may be employed by the General Contractor on this project, and will ensure that all of its subcontractors will meet the same requirement?

(NOTE: This graduation requirement shall not apply to programs providing apprenticeship training for any craft that has not been deemed by the Department of Labor and the Department of Industrial Relations to be an apprenticable craft within the period of October, 1999 to October, 2001.)

Yes No

A-19. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five years in which the General

Contractor or any of its Associates was required to pay either back wages or penalties for failure to comply with the State’s prevailing wage laws?

Yes No

If ”yes,” attach a separate page, describing the violator, nature of each violation, name of the project, date of its completion, the public agency for which it was constructed, the number of employees who were initially underpaid and the amount of back wages and penalties that were assessed.

A-20. During the last five years, has there been more than one occasion in which the General Contractor or any of its Associates have been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements?

Yes No

If ”yes,” attach a separate page, describing the violator, nature of each violation, name of the project, date of its completion, the public agency for which it was constructed; the number of employees who were initially underpaid and the amount of back wages and penalties that were assessed.


Safety

A-21. List the General Contractor’s Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers’ compensation insurance) for each of the past three premium years:

(NOTE: An Experience Modification Rate is issued to your firm annually by your workers’ compensation insurance carrier.)

Year: 2016 EMR:

Year: 2015 EMR: Year: 2014 EMR:

If your EMR for any of these three years is 1.00 or higher you may attach a letter of explanation.

Is your firm party to an alternative dispute resolution system as provided for in Section 3201.5 of the Labor Code?

Yes No

A-22 Has CALOSHA cited and assessed penalties against the General Contractor or any of its Associates for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years?

(NOTE: If you have filed an appeal of a citation, and the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board has not yet ruled on your appeal, you need not include information about it.)

Yes No

If “yes,” on separate page describe the citations, state the case number, the party against whom the citation was made, date of citation, nature of the violation, project on which the citation was issued, owner of project, and the amount of penalty paid, if any.

A-23 Has Fed OSHA cited and assessed penalties against the General Contractor or any of its Associates for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years?


Yes No

If “yes,” on separate page describe the citations, state the case number, the party against whom the citation was made, date of citation, nature of the violation, project on which the citation was issued, owner of project, and the amount of penalty paid, if any.


A-24 Has the California EPA, any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either the General Contractor or its associates or the owner of a project during the time in which the preceding parties were performing on a contract in the past five years?

(NOTE: If an appeal of the citation has been filed and there is no ruling yet, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation.)

Yes No A-25 Within the last five years has there ever been a period when the General Contractor or its

associates had employees but was without workers’ compensation insurance or state-approved self-insurance?

Yes No

If “yes”, please explain the reason for the absence of workers’ compensation insurance on a separate page. If “No”, please provide a statement by your current workers’ compensation insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the General Contractor for the last five years. (If the General Contractor has been in business for less than five years, provide a statement by your workers’ compensation insurance carrier verifying continuous workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has been in business.”

A-26. Does the General Contractor have an injury prevention program instituted pursuant to California Occupational Safety and Health requirements? (A “No” answer is grounds for disqualification.

There is no other or separate scoring of this answer.)

Yes No

A-27. How often does the General Contractor require documented safety meetings to be held for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project?


Familiarity with and proximity to site

A-28. List the proximity (statute miles) of the Design-Build Entity’s office(s) where the work will be performed, in relation to the project location.

General Contractor management office for this project:

Statute miles: Years in this location:

A-29. Has the General Contractor ever constructed a Community College project in the state of California?

Yes No

If “yes,”

How many Projects?

Project Name(s) _______________________________________________

Project Description _______________________________________________

Year Completed ___________ _


B. Team Member Questions for the Architect of Record



Definitions:

“Architect of Record” means the licensed architect member of the Design-Build Entity whose

stamp will appear on the Project Construction Documents.

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Architect of Record is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Architect of Record.

Name of Architect of Record:

Name of Firm:


General

B-1. How many years has the Architect of Record been licensed and practicing in California? Years: CA License


B-2. Is the Architect or Record or the Firm currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No




B-3. Was the Architect of Record or Firm in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question B-2, above)

Yes No




B-4. In the last five years has the Architect of Record or the Firm, been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No


B-5. Has the Architect of Record or the Firm ever been denied an award of a public works contract

based on a finding by a public agency that they were not properly qualified?

Yes No


B-6. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against

the Architect of Record or the Firm concerning its architectural work on a project for which they were found at fault?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court and case number, and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending or, if resolved, a brief description of the resolution).


B-7. In the past five years has the Architect of Record or the Firm, made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner concerning its architectural work on a project and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No

If “yes,” on separate page identify the claim by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the entity (or entities) against whom the claim was filed, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court and case number, and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending, or if resolved, a brief description of the resolution).

B-8. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew an

insurance policy for the Architect of Record or the Firm, based on non-payment or losses?

Yes No

If “yes,” on separate page give name the insurance carrier, the form of insurance and the year of the refusal.

B-9. Has the Architect of Record or the Firm (or any manager of the Firm if the Firm is not a person)

ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page identify who was involved, the name of the public agency, the date of the investigation and the grounds for the finding.

B-10. Has the Architect of Record or the firm ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?

Yes No If “yes”, on a separate page identify who was convicted, the name of the victim, the date of the

conviction, the court and case number, the crimes, and the grounds for the conviction. B-11. Has the Architect of Record or the firm ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud,

theft, or any other act of dishonesty>

Yes No If “yes:, on a separate page identify the person or persons convicted, the court and case number,

the crimes and the year convicted.



B-12. List the proximity (statute miles) of the Architect’s office(s) where the work will be performed, in relation to the project location.

Architect’s production office: Statute miles: Years in this location: Years:

B-13. Has the Architect of Record ever designed a Community College project in the state of California in the last 5 years?

Yes No

If “yes,” indicate

i) How many Projects? B-14. Has the Department of Consumer Affairs taken any disciplinary action against the Architect of

Record?

Yes No If “yes”, please explain on a separate page.


C. Team Member Questions for the Structural Engineer



Definitions:

“Structural Engineer” shall mean only the Structural Engineer of Record

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Structural Engineer is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Structural Engineer.

Name of Principal Structural Engineer:

Name of Firm:


General

C-1. How many years has the Structural Engineer been licensed and practicing in California?

Years: CA License:


C-2. Is the Structural Engineer or Firm currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No



C-3. Was the Structural Engineer or Firm in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question C-2, above)

Yes No





C-4. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against the Structural Engineer or the Firm concerning its engineering work on a project?

Yes No

If “yes,” identify the claim(s) by providing the project name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, a brief description of the nature of the claim, the court and case number, and a brief description of the status of the claim (pending or, if resolved, a brief description of the resolution).

C-5. In the last five years has the Structural Engineer or the Firm been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No


C-6. Has the Structural Engineer or the Firm ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No



C-7. In the past five years has the Structural Engineer or the Firm made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner concerning engineering work on a project and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No


C-8. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew an

insurance policy for the Structural Engineer or the Firm based on non-payment or losses?

Yes No


C-9. Has the Structural Engineer or the Firm (or any manager of the Firm if the Firm is not a person) ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity?

Yes No

If “yes,” on a separate page identify who was found liable or convicted, the name of the public agency, the court and case number, the date of the investigation and the grounds for the finding.

C-10. Has the Structural Engineer of the firm ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?


conviction, the court and case number, the crimes, and the grounds for the conviction. C-11. Has the Structural Engineer or the firm ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of farud,

theft, or any other act of dishonesty?

Yes No If “yes”, on a separate page identify who was convicted, the court and case number, the crimes

and the year convicted.



C-12. List the proximity (statute miles) of the Structural Engineer’s office(s) where the work will be performed, in relation to the project location.

Structural Engineer’s production office: Statute miles: Years in this location: Years:

C-13. Has the Structural Engineer ever designed a Community College project in the state of California in the last 5 years?

Yes No

If “yes,” indicate the following:

How many Projects?

C-14. Has the Department of Consumer Affairs taken any disciplinary action against the Structural Engineer?

Yes No If “yes”, please explain on a separate page.


D. Team Member Questions for the Civil Engineer



Definitions:

“Civil Engineer” shall mean only the Civil Engineer of Record

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Civil Engineer is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Civil Engineer.

Name of Principal Civil Engineer:

Name of Firm:


General

D-1. How many years has the Civil Engineer been licensed and practicing in California?

Years: CA License:


D-2. Is the Civil Engineer or Firm currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No




D-3. Was the Civil Engineer or Firm in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question D-2, above)

Yes No




D-4. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against the Civil Engineer or the Firm concerning its engineering work on a project?

Yes No


D-5. In the last five years has the Civil Engineer or the Firm been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No


D-6. Has the Civil Engineer or the Firm ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No



D-7. In the past five years has the Civil Engineer or the Firm made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner concerning engineering work on a project and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No


D-8. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew an

insurance policy for the Civil Engineer or the Firm based on non-payment or losses?

Yes No


D-9. Has the Civil Engineer or the Firm (or any manager of the Firm if the Firm is not a person) ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity?

Yes No


D-10. Has the Civil Engineer of the firm ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?


conviction, the court and case number, the crimes, and the grounds for the conviction. D-11. Has the Civil Engineer or the firm ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of farud, theft,

or any other act of dishonesty?




D-12. List the proximity (statute miles) of the Civil Engineer’s office(s) where the work will be performed, in relation to the project location.


Civil Engineer’s production office: Statute miles: Years in this location: Years:

D-13. Has the Civil Engineer ever designed a Community College project in the state of California in the last 5 years?

Yes No


How many Projects?

D-14. Has the Department of Consumer Affairs taken any disciplinary action against the Civil Engineer? Yes No If “yes”, please explain on a separate page.


E. Team Member Questions for Other Design Professional or Engineer

This form should be used for the sports complex design professional and other design disciplines necessary for the project including electrical engineering and mechanical engineering if not provided as a part of the electrical or mechanical contractor’s in-house services. Each of the following Questions shall be scored.


Definitions:

“Other Engineer” shall mean only the Engineer of Record for disciplines other than Civil or Structural or Design Professional in Disciplines other than Engineering

“Firm” shall mean, in the case where the Engineer is not an individual doing business as a sole proprietorship, the firm (whether a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership or other association) which employs the Engineer.

Name of Principal Engineer:

Discipline:

Name of Firm:


General

E-1. How many years has the Engineer been licensed and practicing in California?

Years: CA License:


E-2. Is the Engineer or Firm currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No




E-3. Was the Engineer or Firm in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question E-2, above)

Yes No




E-4. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against the Engineer or the Firm concerning its engineering work on a project?

Yes No


E-5. In the last five years has the Engineer or the Firm been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No


E-6. Has the Engineer or the Firm ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No



E-7. In the past five years has the Engineer or the Firm made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner concerning engineering work on a project and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No


E-8. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew an

insurance policy for the Civil Engineer or the Firm based on non-payment or losses?

Yes No


E-9. Has the Engineer or the Firm (or any manager of the Firm if the Firm is not a person) ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public agency or entity?

Yes No


E-10. Has the Engineer of the firm ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?


conviction, the court and case number, the crimes, and the grounds for the conviction. E-11. Has the Engineer or the firm ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or

any other act of dishonesty?




E-12. List the proximity (statute miles) of the Engineer’s office(s) where the work will be performed, in relation to the project location.


Engineer’s production office: Statute miles: Years in this

location: Years:

E-13. Has the Engineer ever designed a Community College project in the state of California in the last 5 years?

Yes No


How many Projects?

E-14. Has the Department of Consumer Affairs taken any disciplinary action against the Engineer?

Yes No

If “yes”, please explain on a separate page.


F. Scored Questions for the Pre-Qualification of the Electrical Subcontractor


Definitions:

The term “Associates” shall mean all of the following:

The current qualifiers for all current Contractors State License Board contracting licenses held by the contractor.

All current officers of a contractor which is a corporation.

All current partners of a contractor which is a partnership.

All current joint venture members of the joint venture contractor which is seeking

prequalification. Subcontractor Name:

F-1. How many years has the Electrical Subcontractor been licensed in California?

Years:

F-2. Is the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No




F-3. Was the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question F-2, above)

Yes No


Case Number Bankruptcy Court Date Filed F-4. At any time in the last five years has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates been assessed

liquidated damages of more than $50,000 on a construction contract with either a public or private owner?

Yes No

If yes, explain on a separate page, identifying all such projects by owner, owner’s address, name of entity against whom assessment was made, the date of completion of the project, amount of liquidated damages assessed and all other information necessary to fully explain the assessment of liquidated damages.

F-5. In the past five years has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates ever defaulted on a construction contract?

Yes No

If “yes,” explain on a separate page. F-6. In the last five years has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates been debarred, disqualified,

removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No



F-7. Has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No


(NOTE: The following two questions refer only to disputes between contractors and owners of projects. You need not include information about disputes with suppliers or other contractors.

F-8. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against

the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates concerning their work on a construction project?

Yes No


F-9. In the past five years has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner or a general contractor concerning work on a project or payment for a contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No


F-10. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the

insurance policy for the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates due to non-payment or contractor losses?

Yes No



F-11. Has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public entity?

Yes No


F-12. Has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?

Yes No

If “yes,” explain on a separate page, including identifying who was convicted, the name of the victim, the date of the conviction, the court and case number, the crimes, and the grounds for the conviction.

F-13. Has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?

Yes No

If “yes,” identify on a separate page the person or persons convicted, the court and case number, the crimes, and the year convicted.

F-14. During the last five years, has there ever been a period of time when the Electrical Subcontractor

or its associates had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required?

Yes No

If yes, indicate the period during which no surety bonds were in place, name of entity without surety bond, the name of project owner, and if coverage was denied the date coverage was denied and the name of the company that denied coverage.


F-15. Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years?


Yes No

If “yes,” on separate page describe the citations, the party against whom the citation was made, date of citation, nature of the violation, project on which the citation was issued, owner of project, and the amount of penalty paid, if any. State the case number and date of any OSHAB decision.

F-16. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties

against the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates in the past five years?

(NOTE: If an appeal of the citation has been filed and the Appeals Board has not yet ruled, or if there is a court appeal pending, you need not include information about the citation.)

Yes No

If “yes,” on separate page describe the citations, the party against whom the citation was made, date of citation, nature of the violation, project on which the citation was issued, owner of project, and the amount of penalty paid, if any. State the case number and date of any decision.

F-17. Has the California EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either the Electrical Subcontractor, its associates, or the owner of a project during the time in which the preceding parties were performing on a contract in the past five years?


Yes No


F-18. How often does the Electrical Subcontractor require documented safety meetings to be held for

construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project?


F-19. List the Electrical Subcontractor’s Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers’ compensation insurance) for each of the past three premium years:


Year: 2016 EMR:


If your EMR for any of these three years is or was 1.00 or higher you it is recommended that you attach a letter of explanation.

F-20. Within the last five years has there ever been a period when the Electrical Subcontractor or its


Yes No

If “yes,” please explain the reason for the absence of workers’ compensation insurance on a separate page. If “No,” please provide a statement by your current workers’ compensation insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the Electrical Subcontractor for the last five years. (If the Electrical Subcontractor has been in business for less than five years, provide a statement by your workers’ compensation insurance carrier verifying continuous workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has been in business.)

F-21. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five years in which the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates was required to pay either back wages or penalties for failure to comply with the state’s prevailing wage laws?

Yes No


F-22. During the last five years, has there been more than one occasion in which the Electrical

Subcontractor or its associates have been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements?

Yes No


F-23. If the Electrical Subcontractor operates its own State-approved apprenticeship program, provide


the following information on a separate page:


(b) State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach

evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s).

(c) State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any

time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm.

F-24. At any time during the last five years, has the Electrical Subcontractor or its associates been found

to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works?

Yes No

If “yes,” provide the date of the findings and attach a copy of the final decision.

Date of Findings

F-25. Do agreements exist between the Electrical Subcontractor and registered apprenticeship programs which have been approved by the California Apprenticeship Council and have graduated apprentices in the preceding five years, for all apprenticable crafts which may be employed by the Electrical Subcontractor on this project?

(This graduation requirement shall not apply to programs providing apprenticeship training for any craft that has not been deemed by the Department of Labor and the Department of Industrial Relations to be an apprenticable craft within the period of October, 1999 to October, 2001.)

Yes No

F-26. If seeking to pre-qualify for a Community College District project, has the Electrical Subcontractor performed on a contract to build public colleges in the last 5 years?

Yes No

If “yes,” how many?


G. Scored Questions for the Pre-Qualification of the Mechanical Subcontractor


Definitions:


The current qualifiers for all current Contractors State License Board contracting licenses held by the contractor.


All current partners of a contractor which is a partnership. • All current joint venture members of the joint venture contractor which is seeking

prequalification.

Subcontractor Name:

G-1. How many years has the Mechanical Subcontractor been licensed in California?

Years:

G-2. Is the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No




G-3. Was the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question G-2, above)

Yes No



G-4. At any time in the last five years has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates been assessed liquidated damages of more than $50,000 on a project under a construction contract with either a public or private owner?

Yes No


G-5. In the last five years has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates ever defaulted on a construction contract?

Yes No


G-6. In the last five years has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No


G-7. Has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No


(NOTE: The following two questions refer only to disputes between contractors and owners of projects. You need not include information about disputes with suppliers, or other contractors.


G-8. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates concerning their work on a construction project?

Yes No


G-9. In the past five years has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner or a general contractor concerning work on a project or payment for a contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No


G-10. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates due to non-payment or contractor losses?

Yes No


G-11. Has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public entity?

Yes No


G-12. Has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?

Yes No



G-13. Has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?

Yes No


G-14. During the last five years, has there ever been a period of time when the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required?

Yes No


G-15. Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years?


Yes No


G-16. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties against the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates in the past five years?


Yes No



G-17. Has the California EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either the Mechanical Subcontractor, its associates, or the owner of a project during the time in which the preceding parties were performing on a contract in the past five years?


Yes No


G-18. How often does the Mechanical Subcontractor require documented safety meetings to be held

for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project?

G-19. List the Mechanical Subcontractor’s Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers’ compensation insurance) for each of the past three premium years:


Year: 2016 EMR:


If your EMR for any of these three years is or was 1.00 or higher you may attach a letter of explanation.

G-20. Within the last five years has there ever been a period when the Mechanical Subcontractor or its


Yes No

If “yes,” please explain the reason for the absence of workers’ compensation insurance on a separate page. If “No,” please provide a statement by your current workers’ compensation insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the Mechanical Subcontractor for the last five years. (If the Mechanical Subcontractor has been in business for less than five years, provide a statement by your workers’ compensation insurance carrier verifying continuous workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has been in business.)


G-21. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five years in which the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates was required to pay either back wages or penalties for failure to comply with the California’s prevailing wage laws?

Yes No


G-22. During the last five years, has there been more than one occasion in which the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates have been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements?

Yes No


G-23. If the Mechanical Subcontractor operates its own State-approved apprenticeship program, provide the following information on a separate page:


(b) State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s).

(c) State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm.

G-24. At any time during the last five years, has the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works?

Yes No


Date of Findings


G-25. Do agreements exist between the Mechanical Subcontractor and registered apprenticeship programs which have been approved by the California Apprenticeship Council and have graduated apprentices in the preceding five years, for all apprenticable crafts which may be employed by the Mechanical Subcontractor on this project?


Yes No

G-26. If seeking to pre-qualify for a Community College District project, has the Mechanical Subcontractor performed on a contract to build public colleges in the last 5 years?

Yes No



H. Scored Questions for the Pre-Qualification of Other Subcontractor

This form should be used for any trade contractors that the Design-Build Entity believes would specifically add significant value during the design process.


Definitions:


The current qualifiers for all current Contractors State License Board contracting licenses held bythe contractor.


All current partners of a contractor which is a partnership.• All current joint venture members of the joint venture contractor which is seeking

prequalification.

Subcontractor Name:

H-1. How many years has the Subcontractor been licensed in California?

Years:

H-2. Is the Subcontractor or its associates currently the debtor in a bankruptcy case?

Yes No




H-3. Was the Subcontractor or its associates in bankruptcy at any time during the last five years? (This question refers only to a bankruptcy action that was not described in answer to question H-2, above)

Yes No



H-4. At any time in the last five years has the Subcontractor or its associates been assessed liquidated damages of more than $50,000 on a project under a construction contract with either a public or private owner?

Yes No


H-5. In the last five years has the Subcontractor or its associates ever defaulted on a construction contract?

Yes No


H-6. In the last five years has the Subcontractor or its associates been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any reason?

Yes No


H-7. Has the Subcontractor or its associates ever been denied an award of a public works contract based on a finding by a public agency that they were not a responsible bidder?

Yes No


(NOTE: The following two questions refer only to disputes between contractors and owners of projects. You need not include information about disputes with suppliers, or other contractors.


H-8. In the past five years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in court or arbitration against the Subcontractor or its associates concerning their work on a construction project?

Yes No


H-9. In the past five years has the Subcontractor or its associates made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner or a general contractor concerning work on a project or payment for a contract and filed that claim in court or arbitration?

Yes No


H-10. In the last five years has any insurance carrier, for any form of insurance, refused to renew the insurance policy for the Subcontractor or its associates due to non-payment or contractor losses?

Yes No


H-11. Has the Subcontractor or its associates ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public entity?

Yes No


H-12. Has the Subcontractor or its associates ever been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to construction?

Yes No


H-13. Has the Subcontractor or its associates ever been convicted of a federal or state crime of


fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?

Yes No


H-14. During the last five years, has there ever been a period of time when the Subcontractor or its associates had no surety bond in place during a public construction project when one was required?

Yes No


H-15. Has CAL OSHA cited and assessed penalties against the Subcontractor or its associates for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations of its safety or health regulations in the past five years?


Yes No


H-16. Has the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited and assessed penalties against the Mechanical Subcontractor or its associates in the past five years?


Yes No



H-17. Has the California EPA or any Air Quality Management District or any Regional Water Quality Control Board cited and assessed penalties against either the Subcontractor, its associates, or the owner of a project during the time in which the preceding parties were performing on a contract in the past five years?


Yes No


H-18. How often does the Subcontractor require documented safety meetings to be held for construction employees and field supervisors during the course of a project?

H-19. List the Subcontractor’s Experience Modification Rate (EMR) (California workers’ compensation insurance) for each of the past three premium years:


Year: 2016 EMR:


If your EMR for any of these three years is or was 1.00 or higher you may attach a letter of explanation.

H-20. Within the last five years has there ever been a period when the Subcontractor or its associates had employees but was without workers’ compensation insurance or state-approved self-insurance?

Yes No

If “yes,” please explain the reason for the absence of workers’ compensation insurance on a separate page. If “No,” please provide a statement by your current workers’ compensation insurance carrier that verifies periods of workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the Mechanical Subcontractor for the last five years. (If the Mechanical Subcontractor has been in business for less than five years, provide a statement by your workers’ compensation insurance carrier verifying continuous workers’ compensation insurance coverage for the period that your firm has been in business.)


H-21. Has there been more than one occasion during the last five years in which the Subcontractor or its associates was required to pay either back wages or penalties for failure to comply with the California’s prevailing wage laws?

Yes No


H-22. During the last five years, has there been more than one occasion in which the Subcontractor or its associates have been penalized or required to pay back wages for failure to comply with the Federal Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements?

Yes No


H-23. If the Subcontractor operates its own State-approved apprenticeship program, provide the following information on a separate page:

(d) Identify the craft or crafts in which you provided apprenticeship training in the past year.

(e) State the year in which each such apprenticeship program was approved, and attach evidence of the most recent California Apprenticeship Council approval(s) of your apprenticeship program(s).

(f) State the number of individuals who were employed by your firm as apprentices at any time during the past three years in each apprenticeship and the number of persons who, during the past three years, completed apprenticeships in each craft while employed by your firm.

H-24. At any time during the last five years, has the Subcontractor or its associates been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works?

Yes No


Date of Findings


H-25. Do agreements exist between the Subcontractor and registered apprenticeship programs which have been approved by the California Apprenticeship Council and have graduated apprentices in the preceding five years, for all apprenticable crafts which may be employed by the Mechanical Subcontractor on this project?


Yes No

H-26. If seeking to pre-qualify for a Community College District project, has the Subcontractor performed on a contract to build public colleges in the last 5 years?

Yes No



IV. CERTIFICATION

NOTE: Authorized person(s) with authority to execute this Certification shall sign this Certification on behalf of each of the entities (or persons) that is a constituent member of the Design-Build Entity that is the proposer seeking to be pre-qualified by the District.

Make additional copies this certification page as needed to provide certification for each such person or legal entity.

I, the undersigned , certify and declare that I acknowledge receipt of addenda (insert numbers) , , , , , and have read all the foregoing answers to this Pre-Qualification Questionnaire; that all responses are correct and complete of my own knowledge and belief. I further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that the foregoing is true and correct.

(Signature)

(Printed name)

(Place of Execution)

(Date)

Name of the entity (or person)* on whose behalf this Certificate is signed

*Name of an entity (or person) that is a constituent memberof the Design-Build Entity.

END PRE-QUALIFICATION QUESTIONNAIRE



ATTACHMENT NO. 3

SUPPLEMENTAL QUALIFICATIONS INFORMATION REQUIRED

(PERSONNEL, PROJECTS COMPLETED AND REFERENCES)

The maximum possible score is 420 points.

SCORING: Responses to each of the following Questions or Requests for Information will be

scored. The score will be used to evaluate relevant past experience of the team, assessing the

capabilities of the team, and developing the shortlist of Design-Build Entities to be invited to

participate in the Request for Proposal process.

The term “Design-Build” as used means only design and construction of a project

under a single contract. If there was not a single contract for both design and

construction of the referenced project, it does not qualify as design-build.

The purpose of this section is to determine the following:

o Project Staff – The credentials, experience and committee’s evaluation of eachkey person’s ability to perform the work.

o Personnel resources and expertise available, or the ability to obtain them, in orderto deliver a superior project outcome.

o Experience and Ability – The experience and ability of the individual Design-BuildEntity Member companies and the experience of the Design-Build Entity as ateam.

o Past examples and references for the determination of a satisfactory record of

performance and integrity.

Any listed experience or projects provided must be for the named individuals and not

related to any other corporation, company, limited partnership, partnership, or other

association or legal entity in which the individual was not directly involved. Any such

experience or project provided herein shall identity the corporation, company, limited

partnership, partnership, or other association or legal entity which was awarded the public

work contract.

REFERENCES AND INTERVIEWS: The following procedures shall apply if the District

elects, in its discretion, to conduct interviews of references provided:

1. Interviews will be conducted under the supervision of or by a member of the Selection

Committee. No action is necessary by the Design-Build Entity Members if not notified

by the District.

2. List at least two (2) References for each project. Interviews will be with one of the contact

persons for the Project identified in your response. It is the Design-Build Entity’s

responsibility to verify the latest and current contact information for all references.



3. Identical questions from a standardized list of questions shall be asked of each reference.

4. The District reserves the right to check other references for Design-Build Entities in

general, whether or not such references are listed by Design-Build Entities.

A. PERSONNEL AND REFERENCES

Total points available 140

1. List the following key personnel who will be assigned to this Project for the Design-Build

Entity:

General Contractor Executive in Charge of Project

General Contractor Project Manager

General Contractor Superintendent

Architect Principal in Charge of Project

Architect of Record

Structural Engineer of Record

Civil Engineer of Record

Electrical Engineer of Record

Mechanical Engineer of Record

Electrical Contractor Project and/or Pre-Construction Manager

Mechanical Contractor Project and/or Pre-Construction Manager

Low Voltage Contractor Project and/or Pre-Construction Manager

Athletics Complex Consultant/Contractor

For each of the team members above, provide a resume containing the individual’s overall

experience, education, licensing and other general information as well as the individual’s: i)

California higher education design and/or construction project experience, and ii) design-

build project design and/or construction experience. Include at least two (2) references for

each of the projects identified for each individual. These individuals are to be committed

to the roles indicated for the project and may not be subject to substitution without prior



written approval of, and at the sole discretion of the District. Any persons so substituted

must possess qualifications equal to or better than the individuals who may be prequalified.

2. Provide an Organization Chart for the project indicating, at a minimum, the roles and

relationships of the above-named individuals.

3. Please provide a list of the design-build projects the General Contractor and the Architect of

Record involved in this Design-build Entity have worked on together in the past

4. List volume of construction and value of largest design-build project, which the General

Contractor and Architect have worked together on.

Volume: _______________ SF Largest Design-Build Contact: $__________________

B. DESIGN-BUILD AND HIGHER EDUCATION PROJECTS AND REFERENCES:

Total points available: 80

1. For the General Contractor, please provide information on four (4) relevant design-build

projects within the past five years, executed by the office that will be responsible for this

project. The design-build projects may be public or private. Include no more than one (1)

photo showing an exterior elevation or other perspective representing the project. Include

only DESIGN-BUILD projects. (Education projects preferred)

Names and references must be current and verifiable. (Copy for additional sheets)

Project Name:

Location:

Provide as many as are relevant to the identified project

Reference 1 - Owner (Contact Person) Name and Current Telephone Number:

Reference 2 - Architect or Other (Contact Person) Name and Current Telephone Number:

Reference 3 – Principal Engineers (Contact Person) Name and Current Telephone Number:

Reference 4 – Construction Manager (Contact Person) Name and Current Telephone Number:



Description of Project, Scope of Work Performed:

Value of Original Contract:

Value of Contract including change orders:

Original Scheduled Completion Date:

Time Extensions Granted (number of calendar days):

Actual Date of Completion:

2. For the Architect of Record, list no more than four (4) new higher education facilities

projects in California in the past 10 years (California Community College experience

preferred, Design-Build projects preferred, projects with General Contractor preferred).

Include no more than one (1) project photo showing an exterior elevation

Names and references must be current and verifiable. (Copy for additional sheets)

Project Name:

Location:

Reference 1 - Owner (Contact Person) Name and Current Telephone Number:

Reference 2 - Construction Manager or Other (Contact Person) Name and Current Telephone

Number:

Description of Project, Scope of Work Performed:

Type of Procurement (D-B-B, D-B, CM@R, L-LB, Etc.)

Value of Original Contract:

Value of Contract including change orders:

Original Scheduled Completion Date:



Time Extensions Granted (number of calendar days):

Actual Date of Completion:

Glossary of Abbreviations:

D-B-B Design-Bid-Build

D-B Design-Build

CM@R Construction Management at Risk

L-LB Lease-Lease Back

C. EXAMPLES OF USE OF TARGET VALUE DESIGN, COLLABORATIVE

PRACTICES AND LEAN

Total points available: 90

C.1 Provide up to 3 specific examples of how the team has used target value design successfully

on past design-build or integrated form of agreement projects.

Please identify the projects, target cost of the projects, final cost of the projects. Please describe how

the budget model was developed and tracked during design.

C.2 Provide up to 3 specific examples of how your team has used collaboration to enhance

communication, the project culture, and team performance.

C.3 Provide up to 3 specific examples of Lean practices the team has used on projects and the

benefits realized as a result.

D. DATA/IT/LOW VOLTAGE CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE:

Total Points Available: 60

D-1 For the Data/IT/Low Voltage Contractor, provide information showing that the contractor

holds a valid State of California C-7 Low- Voltage license, has completed at least ten (10)

projects of equal scope, has been in business of furnishing and installing systems of this scope

and magnitude for at least five (5) years, and capable of being bonded to assure the District’s

Representative of performance and satisfactory service during the guarantee period. A twenty-

five (25) year Extended Product Warranty and Application Assurance for the voice/data wiring

system shall be provided.

D-2 For the Data/IT/Low Voltage Contractor, provide accreditation showing that the contractor is

certified by the District’s preferred manufacturers:



1. Structured Cabling Systems (SCS): Panduit (recommended), or college approved equal

2. Air Blown Fiber system: Sumitomo Electric Lightwave FutureFLEX ABF system

3. Horizontal/Vertical Wire Management: Panduit (recommended), or college approved equal

4. Non-ABF Fiber Cable: General Cable / Panduit, or college approved equal

5. Cabinets, Racks, and Ladder tray: Hoffman (recommended), or college approved equal.

6. Riser and OSP Copper Cable: General Cable (recommended), or college approved equal

7. Protectors: Circa, Porta Systems

8. Splice Cases: Sumitomo, Preformed

9. UPS: APC

10. Access Control System: Assa-Abloy / Imron

11. Data Electronics/ VOIP Components/ Wifi Access Points: Cisco

12. Digital Media Switching System: Crestron

13. Video Surveillance Cameras: Panduit

14. Audiovisual Equipment, Projectors: Hitachi

D-3 For the Data/IT/Low Voltage Contractor, provide certification showing that the contractor is

a manufacturer’s authorized/certified installer of the specific product and warranty station for

the equipment offered and shall maintain a fully equipped service organization capable of

furnishing adequate repair service to the equipment through the warranty period.

D-4 For the Data/IT/Low Voltage Contractor, provide certification showing that at least 30 percent

of the contractor’s technicians installing UTP Systems must have a current Panduit Certified

Copper Technicians certificate, or accepted substitute manufacturer, to install copper

distribution systems.


of the contractor’s technicians installing Fiber Distribution Systems must have a current Panduit

Certified Fiber Technicians certificate, or accepted substitute manufacturer certificate, to install

fiber distribution systems.


of the contractor’s technicians installing Air Blown Fiber Distribution Systems must have a

current Sumitomo “Future-Flex” Certified Fiber Technicians certificate, or accepted substitute

manufacturer certificate, to install fiber distribution systems.

E. ATHLETICS COMPLEX CONSULTANT/CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE:

Total Points Available: 50



E-1 For the Athletic Complex Consultant, provide information showing that the consultant is a

registered architect with the AIA California State Licensing Board, has been in the business of

furnishing and installing systems of this scope and magnitude for at least five (5) years.

E-2 For the Athletic Complex Consultant, provide information showing that the consultant has

designed at least ten (10) projects of equal scope.

E-3 For the Athletic Complex Consultant, provide information showing that the consultant is a

registered Landscape Architect with the California Board of Landscape Architects.

E-4 For the Design Build Contractor, provide information showing that the contractor has

completed at least five (5) athletic complex facilities which included tennis court and court

lighting components as part of the project.

E-5 For the Design Build Contractor, provide information showing that the contractor has

completed at least two (2) athletic complex facilities at a community college or higher education

campus. Facilities listed shall have included tennis court and court lighting components as part

of the project.

ID Task

Mode

Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors

1 Select Criteria Architect 86 days Fri 6/9/17 Fri 10/6/17

2 Develop Criteria Architect RFP 12 days Fri 6/9/17 Mon 6/26/17

3 Issue RFP 0 days Tue 6/27/17 Tue 6/27/17 2FS+1 day

4 Preproposal Meeting 0 days Fri 7/7/17 Fri 7/7/17 3FS+8 days

5 Last Day for Questions 0 days Fri 7/21/17 Fri 7/21/17 4FS+2 days

6 Proposals Due 0 days Fri 7/28/17 Fri 7/28/17 5FS+6 days

7 Committee Review of Criteria Architect Proposals 12 days Mon 7/31/17 Tue 8/15/17 6

8 Evaluation Team Assessment Meeting 0 days Tue 8/15/17 Tue 8/15/17 7

9 Announcement of Interviews - Criteria Architect 1 day Thu 8/17/17 Thu 8/17/17 8FS+1 day

10 Interviews 0 days Fri 8/25/17 Fri 8/25/17 9FS+5 days

11 Announce Recommended Criteria Architect Firm 0 days Mon 8/28/17 Mon 8/28/17 10FS+2 days

12 Contract Negotiation 0 days Wed 8/30/17 Wed 8/30/17 11FS+2 days

13 Board Recommendation 0 days Fri 9/1/17 Fri 9/1/17

14 Board Approval 0 days Mon 9/25/17 Mon 9/25/17

15 Criteria Architect Kick off meeting 0 days Fri 10/6/17 Fri 10/6/17 14FS+10 days

16 Development of Criteria and Programming Phase 75 days Mon 10/9/17 Fri 1/19/18

17 Project Programming 30 days Mon 10/9/17 Fri 11/17/17 15

18 Develop RFP Documents 45 days Mon 11/20/17 Fri 1/19/18 17

19 Obtain Design Build Entity 137 days Tue 10/31/17 Wed 5/9/18

20 Initial Advertisement for Pre-Qualification 6 days Tue 10/31/17 Tue 11/7/17

21 Second Advertisement for Pre-Qualification 0 days Tue 11/7/17 Tue 11/7/17 20

22 Mandatory Pre Submittal Conference 0 days Mon 11/13/17 Mon 11/13/17 21FS+4 days

23 Deadline for Notice of Intent to Prequalify 0 days Fri 11/17/17 Fri 11/17/17 22FS+4 days

24 Deadline for Questions on Prequalification 0 days Wed 11/22/17 Wed 11/22/17 23FS+3 days

25 Issue Addendume, if needed 0 days Tue 11/28/17 Tue 11/28/17 24FS+4 days

26 Prequalification Submittal Due 0 days Fri 12/1/17 Fri 12/1/17 25FS+3 days

27 Committee Review - Prequalification Packages 22 days Mon 12/4/17 Tue 1/2/18 26

28 Evaluation Team Assessment Meeting for Prequa. Package 0 days Thu 1/4/18 Thu 1/4/18 27FS+2 days

29 Notification 1 day Fri 1/5/18 Fri 1/5/18 28SS

30 Interviews by the District 2 days Thu 1/11/18 Fri 1/12/18 29FS+3 days

31 Notice to Successful Prequalifying Firms 0 days Mon 1/15/18 Mon 1/15/18 30FS+1 day

32 Debriefing Meetings for Firms not Prequalified 0 days Fri 1/19/18 Fri 1/19/18 31FS+4 days

33 Issuance of Request for Proposals (Design - Build Entity) 1 day Thu 1/25/18 Thu 1/25/18 18FS+3 days

34 Confidential One-on-one Interviews 0 days Fri 2/9/18 Fri 2/9/18 33

35 Deadline for RFP Questions 0 days Tue 2/13/18 Tue 2/13/18 34FS+3 days

36 Design-Build Proposals Due 1 day Wed 2/28/18 Wed 2/28/18 35FS+10 days

37 Evaluation of Proposals 15 days Thu 3/1/18 Wed 3/21/18 36

38 Interviews 0 days Fri 3/30/18 Fri 3/30/18

39 Contract Negotiation 3 days Tue 4/3/18 Thu 4/5/18 38FS+2 days

40 Board Recommendation 0 days Thu 4/5/18 Thu 4/5/18 39

41 Board Approval 0 days Mon 4/23/18 Mon 4/23/18

42 Notice to Proceed for Design Phase 0 days Fri 4/27/18 Fri 4/27/18 41FS+5 days

43 Debriefing for Firms that were not selected 0 days Tue 4/24/18 Tue 4/24/18 41FS+2 days

44 Project Kick-off meeting 0 days Fri 4/27/18 Fri 4/27/18 41FS+5 days

45 Design and Construction 914 days Mon 4/30/18 Thu 10/28/21

46 Design Build Entity Design Phase 175 days Mon 4/30/18 Fri 12/28/18 44

47 DSA Review and Approval 120 days Mon 12/31/18 Fri 6/14/19 46

48 Subcontractor Buyout and Finalize GMP 21 days Mon 6/17/19 Mon 7/15/19 47

49 Board Approval on GMP 0 days Mon 8/19/19 Mon 8/19/19

50 Construction 300 days Tue 8/20/19 Mon 10/12/20 49FS+1 day

51 Substantial Completion 10 days Tue 10/13/20 Mon 10/26/20 50

52 Final Completion 0 days Mon 10/26/20 Mon 10/26/20 51

53 Close Out and Final Commissioning 20 days Tue 11/10/20 Mon 12/7/20 51FS+10 days

54 Warranty Period 263 days Tue 10/27/20 Thu 10/28/21 51

55 FF & E Installation 30 days Tue 10/27/20 Mon 12/7/20 52

56 Training and Move In 20 days Tue 12/8/20 Mon 1/4/21 55

6/27

7/7

7/21

7/28

8/15

8/25

8/28

8/30

9/1

9/25

10/6

11/7

11/13

11/17

11/22

11/28

12/1

1/4

1/15

1/19

2/9

2/13

3/30

4/5

4/23

4/27

4/24

4/27

8/19

10/26

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Task

Split

Milestone

Summary

Project Summary

Inactive Task

Inactive Milestone

Inactive Summary

Manual Task

Duration-only

Manual Summary Rollup

Manual Summary

Start-only

Finish-only

External Tasks

External Milestone

Deadline

Progress

Manual Progress

Page 1

Project: TAS Building Draft Sche

Date: Mon 10/30/17

ATTACHMENT 4

ATTACHMENT 5

SOCCCD Project No. 358D


Advanced Transportation and Applied Science Building Project Page 1 of 6

DESIGN-BUILD AGREEMENT FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED SCIENCES

(ATAS) BUILDING PROJECT AT SADDLEBACK COLLEGE

This Design-Build contract between District and Design-Build Entity (“Design-Build Contract”) is entered into on

this xx day of xx, 2018 by and between the South Orange County Community College District (“District”) and

XXXXXXXXXX at XXXXXXXXXX (“Design-Build Entity”).

1 DEFINITIONS

Capitalized terms used in the Contract Documents shall have the meanings assigned to them in the General

Conditions. If not defined in the General Conditions they shall have the meanings assigned to them elsewhere in the

Contract Documents. If not defined in the General Conditions or elsewhere, they shall have the meanings reasonably

understood to apply to them by the context of the portion of the Contract Documents where such terms are used.

2 THE WORK

2.1 SCOPE OF WORK

Design-Build Entity shall fully perform and execute the entire Work called for by the Contract Documents, except to

the extent specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsibility of District or other Project Team

members retained by District.

2.2 STANDARD OF PERFORMANCE

In addition to and without limiting Design-Build Entity’s other obligations under the Contract Documents, Design-

Build Entity shall at all times in its performance of its obligations under the Contract Documents conform to the

following general standards of performance:

2.2.1 comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents;

2.2.2 comply with Applicable Laws;

2.2.3 conform to the standard of care applicable to those who provide design-build project services and

construction of the type called for by this Design-Build Contract for projects of a scope and complexity that is

comparable to the Project;

2.2.4 furnish efficient business administration of the Work, utilizing sufficient senior level management

and other qualified personnel to manage the Work; and

2.2.5 apply its best and highest skill and attention to completing the Work in an expeditious and

economical manner, consistent with the expressed best interests of the District and within the limitations of the

Contract Sum and Contract Time.

3 CONTRACT TIME

3.1 DATES OF COMMENCEMENT

ATTACHMENT 5




The Contract Time for completion of the design portion of the Work shall be measured from the Date of

Commencement of Design. The Contract Time for Substantial completion of entire Work, including the design and

non-design portions, shall be measured from the Date of Commencement of Construction.

3.2 NOTICES TO PROCEED

The design portion of the Work shall not commence prior to the date fixed in the Notice to Proceed with Design. No

physical construction at the Site shall proceed prior to the date fixed in the Notice to Proceed with Construction. The

Notice to Proceed with Construction cannot be issued until the DSA issues the project approval letter .

3.3 CONTRACT TIME

3.3.1 Design. A Notice to Proceed for the Design Phase will be issued upon full execution of this

contract. The Design-Build Entity shall complete the Final Construction Documents and receive DSA approval.

3.3.2 Design and Construction. Design-Build Entity shall achieve Substantial Completion of the entire

Work, including the design and non-design portions of the Work, not later than 914 Days for Phase I after the Date of

Commencement of Design/Construction and shall achieve Final Completion of the entire Work not later than forty-

five (45) Days after the occurrence of Substantial Completion.

3.4 DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DELAY DAMAGES TO DISTRICT

3.4.1 District Right. Pursuant to the California Public Contract Code, including without limitation

section 7203, the District and Design-Build Entity acknowledge and agree that if the Design-Build Entity fails to

achieve Substantial Completion of the Work within the Contract Time, the District will suffer substantial Losses

which are both extremely difficult and impracticable to ascertain and on that basis agree, as a reasonable estimate of

those Losses and not a penalty, to the payment by Design-Build Entity of liquidated set amount pursuant to this

Section 3.4.

3.4.2 Daily Rate. If the Design-Build Entity fails to achieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work

within the Contract Time for Substantial Completion, the Design-Build Entity shall pay the District the liquidated set

amount of To Be Determined ($TBD) per Day for each Day occurring after the expiration of the Contract Time for

Substantial Completion until the Design-Build Entity achieves Substantial Completion of the entire Work.

3.4.3 Extensions of Time. Liquidated set amount shall not be charged to Contractor for Delays to

Substantial Completion for which the Contractor is entitled under the Contract Documents to receive an adjustment

of the Contract Time for Substantial Completion.

3.4.4 Partial Completion. Liquidated set amount shall not be reduced or apportioned for Substantial

Completion of portions of the Work prior to Substantial Completion of the entirety of the Work.

3.4.5 Remedies. District may deduct such liquidated set amount as are payable hereunder from money

due or to become due to the Design-Build Entity, or pursue any other legal remedy to collect such liquidated set

amount from the Design-Build Entity and/or its Surety.

3.4.6 Not a Limitation. District’s rights under this Section 3.4 shall not be interpreted as precluding or

limiting: (1) any right or remedy of District in the event of an Event of Design-Build Entity Default other than a

failure to Substantially Complete the Work within the Contract Time; or (2) District’s right to order an acceleration,

at Design-Build Entity’s Own Expense, of performance of the Work to overcome Delay, including, without

ATTACHMENT 5




limitation, a Delay for which District has the right to assess liquidated damages. This reservation of rights also

applies to the surety and guarantor on the Performance and Payment Bonds.

3.5 DAILY RATE FOR COMPENSABLE DELAY TO DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY

3.5.1 Design-Build Entity’s Right. District and Design-Build Entity acknowledge and agree that if

Design-Build Entity is unable due to Compensable Delay to Substantially Complete the Work within the Contract

Time, the Design-Build Entity and its affected Subcontractors and Sub-consultants will suffer Losses which are both

extremely difficult and impracticable to ascertain and on that basis agree, as a reasonable estimate of those Losses

and not a penalty, to the payment by District of an amount totaling the number of compensable days delayed

multiplied by the daily rate for compensable delay pursuant to this Section 3.5.

3.5.2 Daily Rate. The Contract Sum shall be increased by the sum of To Be Determined Dollars ($TBD)

per Day as compensation for each Day for which Design-Build Entity is entitled under the Contract Documents to an

adjustment extending the Contract Time for Substantial Completion due to Compensable Delay, with no additional

amount added thereto for Allowable Markup thereon.

3.5.3 Payment by District. A Change Order or Unilateral Change Order for an adjustment to the Contract

Sum for the payment for compensable delay permitted by this Section 3.5 shall be executed following, and not

before, actual Substantial Completion and prior to Final Completion. Notwithstanding any other provision of the

Contract Documents to the contrary and without limitation to the District's rights of withholding payment permitted

elsewhere in the Contract Documents or under Applicable Laws, amounts due to the Design-Build Entity pursuant to

this Section 3.5 shall be payable as part of, and not prior to the due date for, Final Payment to Design-Build Entity.

3.5.4 Exclusive Remedy. This daily compensable rate payable pursuant to this Section 3.5 constitutes the

Design-Build Entity’s sole and exclusive right and remedy for recovery of Losses to Design-Build Entity and its

Subcontractors and Sub-consultants, of every Tier, due to Compensable Delay or Unexcused Delay.

3.5.5 Deleted Work. In the event that Deleted Work results in a shortening of the Contract Time, the

Contract Sum shall be reduced by an amount calculated as the product of (1) by the number of Days in the period of

shortening, multiplied by (2) the daily compensable rate amount stated in this Section 3.5.

4 CONTRACT SUM

4.1 LUMP-SUM CONTRACT

4.1.1. Price. District shall pay the Design-Build Entity in current funds for the Design-Build Entity’s

complete performance of the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. District will pay Design-Build

Entity a Lump Sum Price to be negotiated at the end of the design phase of the Contract, including an open-book

buyout of subcontracts. The end of the design phase is deemed to occur when the design documents for the Project

receive Division of State Architect (“DSA”) approval. In no event, however, shall the Lump Sum Price be greater

than the Maximum Allowable Price (MAP) of ($30,000,000). The MAP is the maximum amount the District will

pay and includes all costs and fixed fees set forth below for Design and Pre-Construction Services, Construction

Services, Fee, and Hard Costs as defined below.

1. Maximum Allowable Price (MAP). This is the advertised price that is the maximum amount

contained in the District’s budget for all Work to be provided by the Design-Build Entity, and is the

amount the Design-Build Entity agrees, through its control of the design, in collaboration with the

District, will not be exceeded when establishing the Lump Sum Price.

ATTACHMENT 5




2. Fixed Fees. Fixed fees include Design and Preconstruction Services. Construction Services

and Fee, as defined below.

3. Open Book Buyout of Subcontracts. This shall be accomplished collaboratively with the

District during the design process using Hard Costs as the design target amount. The final Hard

Costs amount will be included in the Lump Sum Price.

4.1.2 Design and Pre-Construction Services. The total fixed sum payable for Design and Pre-

Construction Services shall be XXXXXXXXXXX ($XXXXX.XX) subject to adjustment by Change Order,

according to terms of the Design-Build Contract. This amount shall be incorporated into the Lump Sum Price as

stipulated in Article 4.1.1. The amount payable to the Design-Build Entity in the event that the Design-Build

Contract is terminated prior to commencement of construction shall be limited to a prorated amount of the Design

and Preconstruction Services, based on the percentage of acceptable completion of the Construction Documents that

has been accomplished by Design-Build Entity at the time of such termination.

4.1.3 Construction Services. The total sum payable for Construction Services shall not exceed

XXXXXXXXX ($XXXXXX.XX). These sums are incorporated into the MAP as stipulated in Article 4.1.1.

4.1.4 Fee. The Fee payable to the Design-Build Entity shall not exceed (XXXXX %) of the MAP, not to

exceed XXXXXXXXXX ($XXXXX.XX). These sums are incorporated into the MAP as stipulated in Article 4.1.1.

4.1.5 Hard Costs. The total sum payable for Hard Costs shall not exceed ($XXXXXX). These sums will

be incorporated into the Lump Sum Price as stipulated in Article 4.1.1 and included 2% Design-Build Entity

contingency.

4.1.6 All Inclusive Lump-Sum Price. This shall be the sum total of Fixed Fees and final Hard Costs

established at the end of the design phase of the Contract. The Contract Sum set forth in Article 4 is the total lump-

sum maximum amount payable by District to Design-Build Entity for performance of the Work under the Contract

Documents and is deemed to cover all Losses arising out of or related to the performance of the Work, including,

without limitation, the effects of natural elements upon the Work, unforeseen difficulties or obstructions affecting the

performance of the Work (including, without limitation, unforeseen conditions at the Site that do not constitute

Differing Site Conditions) and fluctuations in market conditions and price escalations (whether occurring locally,

nationally or internationally) from any cause.

5 ENUMERATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

5.1 LIST OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

The Contract Documents, include, without limitation, the following:

5.1.1 Project Criteria. The Project Criteria set forth in the RFP Documents.

5.1.2 RFP Documents. The RFP Documents and Addenda, with the exception of Approved Deviations.

5.1.3. Design Build Proposal. The Design-Build Entity’s written responses to the RFP, including its

Proposal. The Contract Documents shall not include any portion of the Design-Build Proposal that deviates from the

Project Program or Criteria.

5.1.4 Design-Build Contract. This executed Design-Build Contract between District and Design-Build

Entity.

5.1.5 General Conditions. The General Conditions to the Design-Build Contract.

ATTACHMENT 5




5.1.6 Division One Requirement. The Division One Requirements to the Design-Build Contract.

5.1.7 General Requirements, Supplemental and Special Conditions. Any General Requirements and

Supplemental and Special Conditions.

5.1.8 Final Construction Documents. The Final Construction Drawings and Technical Specifications to

be hereafter prepared by the Design-Build Entity and its Sub-consultants that are accepted by the District and

approved by the DSA in accordance with the terms of the Contract Documents; provided, however, that, with the

exception of Approved Deviations, the Contract Documents shall not include any portion of the Design-Build

Proposal that deviates from the Project Program or Criteria.

5.1.9 Addenda. All Addenda associated with the completed set of contract documents

5.1.10 Reference Documents. All Reference Documents associated with the completed set of contract

documents.

ATTACHMENT 5




WHEREFORE, This Design-Build Contract is entered into as of the day and year first written above.

CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE LICENSED AND REGULATED BY THE

CONTRACTOR’S STATE LICENSE BOARD WHICH HAS JURISDICTION TO INVESTIGATE

COMPLAINTS AGAINST DESIGN-BUILD ENTITYS IF A COMPLAINT REGARDING A PATENT ACT

OR OMISSION IS FILED WITHIN FOUR YEARS OF THE DATE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. A

COMPLAINT REGARDING A LATENT ACT OR OMISSION PERTAINING TO STRUCTURAL

DEFECTS MUST BE FILED WITHIN 10 YEARS OF THE DATE OF THE ALLEGED VIOLATION. ANY

QUESTIONS CONCERNING A CONTRACTOR MAY BE REFERRED TO THE REGISTRAR,

CONTRACTORS STATE LICENSE BOARD, P.O. BOX 26000, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, 95826.


By: _____________________________________

Vice Chancellor, Business Services

Design Builder

_______________________, a __________

By: ____________________________________

Title: _______________________________

Date post:	13-Jun-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times