16
RESEARCH TITLE Mala k.k*, Amal A.B, Saman C.D
RESEARCH TITLE
Mala k.k*, Amal A.B, Saman C.D
IntroductionObjectivesMethodologyResultsConclusions
PRESENTATION OUTLINES
limit to maximum of five sentences
Include pictures as given in slide 8 or 9
Limit to 5 slides (can add extra 2 slides for title and outline)
INTRODUCTION
State your objective
OBJECTIVE
Describe your methodology (max. 5 sentences)Include Pictures
METHODOLOGY
Results or output of your projectShow test results/ analytical or numerical results/ and comparison.
If you have done only numerical analysis based project, show how you justify your accuracy.
RESULTS
What you achieved from your project and how it useful to your specialised area.
CONCLUSIONS
Please follow the format, and text sizes provided from slide 1 to 7
You can get an idea referring the slides given below.
Your presentation is from slide 1 to 7 only. Please don’t exceed limits. You will lose your
marks. Presentation time: 5 min x 3 + 5 min for
questions
AAR gel filling a void
Crystalline AAR product within aggregate
ettringite layer formed at cement- aggregate interface
SLIDE 8 –inserting pictures
Details of pre-stressed planks tested
Drawings
Photos
Loading arrangement
Pre-stressing wires properties (Diameter=12.7mm)
0.2% proof stress
fpy (MPa)
Ultimate tensile strength
fp (MPa)
sample 1 1831 1970
sample 2 1842 1988
sample 3 1852 ------
average 1841 1979
Tables
Test results
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Midspan deflection (mm)
Mom
ent (
kNm
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 2 4 6 8 10Deflection (mm)
Mom
ent (
kNm
)
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Cycle 3Moment versus mid-span deflection for beam B-1
Loading and unloading cycles
Test results
Typical concrete cracking and crushing pattern at failure
Concrete rupture
FE results - comparison
Load – Deflection response for beam B-3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80
Deflection (mm)
Beam B3-Exp
Beam B3-FE (with AAR)
Beam B3-EXP (without AAR)
Loa
d (k
N)
FE results - comparisons
Comparison of crack patterns near failure-B2
