CONTRIBUTEDP A P E R
Resonant Tunnelingin III-NitridesRising interest in applications of optoelectronic devices motivates this report on
nitride-based lasers that seem to exhibit capabilities like those formerly
attributed to gallium-based devices.
By Vladimir I. Litvinov, Member IEEE
ABSTRACT | Wide-bandgap semiconductors can sustain high
temperatures and high power operation in various important
applications such as transistors, light-emitting diodes, and
lasers. Although in embryonic stage, one can expect such a
resilience in GaN resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) and super-
lattices as well with distinct applications. Because of the
negative differential conduction, the double barrier resonant
tunneling structures could be the basis for new high-power
coherent microwave sources operating in W-band and tera-
hertz. In this paper, recent progress in wide-bandgap semi-
conductor RTDs is discussed.
KEYWORDS | Resonant tunneling devices; resonant tunneling
diodes; wide-bandgap semiconductors
I . INTRODUCTION
Even at the time of its first observation in GaAs-based
heterostructures [1], resonant tunneling was recognized as
an important mechanism that could be harnessed for
oscillating devices capable of operation in the range ofW-band to terahertz. The operating principles of these
devices is based on the nonlinear electron transport
properties of the structures, namely, the negative differential
conductance (NDC) that is the basis of self-sustained current
oscillations. Resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) have been
fabricated and intensively studied for many decades [2]–[9].
NDC in III–V double-barrier RTD persists up to room
temperature [2], [3], [10], which makes the structurescompetitive among other solid state coherent high-frequency
sources. NDC has also been observed in semiconductor
superlattices (SLs), and SL-based oscillating devices operate
up to 147 GHz [11], [12].
Since GaAs RTD-based oscillators produce microwave
output powers only at a microwatt level, it is imperative
that we explore wide-bandgap semiconductors such as
GaN-InN-AlN alloys, as they can sustain high temperatureand high power operation, as has been the case in several
important applications such as transistors, light-emitting
diodes, and lasers [13]–[15]. Shallow RTD-type structures
grown close to the surface may play an important role in
field emission applications where GaN-coated tips serve as
the large-area and low turn-on voltage electron emitters
[16]. Owing to large conduction band offsets available in
the GaN-based heterostructures, this system would pro-vide much more flexible tuning of resonant tunneling
compared to their GaAs-based counterparts.
Below we review vertical transport properties of
GaN-based RTD-like structures as a first-level attempt with
respect to electrical instabilities that can be used in oscil-
lating device applications. What distinguishes GaN-based
RTDs from those of the GaAs system, in addition to the
former being wide bandgap, is the presence of polarizationcharge and associated electric field with substantial impact
on the expected results. Fittingly, the discussion here will
begin analyzing the band structure with polarization effects
figured in.
II . RESONANT TUNNELING ANDPOLARIZATION FIELDS
Device modeling [17]–[19] has been performed taking into
account the piezoelectric and spontaneous polarizations and
resulted in pretty much standard tunneling I–V character-
istics with a well-defined NDC region, similar to those in
GaAs-based devices but distorted by electrical polarization.
The conduction band profile and electron wave
functions in a double barrier resonant tunneling (DBRT)
Manuscript received March 21, 2009; revised July 22, 2009; accepted July 31, 2009.
Date of publication February 25, 2010; date of current version June 18, 2010. This work
has been supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under a Grant.
The author is with the Sierra Nevada Corporation, Irvine, CA 92618 USA
(e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]).
Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2039027
Vol. 98, No. 7, July 2010 | Proceedings of the IEEE 12490018-9219/$26.00 �2010 IEEE
diode AlN/GaN/AlN are shown in Fig. 1. Band offsets and
polarization-induced internal electric fields in all three
layers have been calculated with the method of [20] and
[32]. The reference energy is the conduction band edge of
the left GaN contact.
Polarization fields shift confinement energy levels in
DBRT diode as compared to those calculated in a flat-band
approximation. Obviously, both polarization fields andapplied voltage distort the band profile, and thus change
the resonant energies with impact on any tunneling
process. The role of applied voltage Vext is seen from a
simple example of tunnel transmission. Biased flat-band
DBRT shown in Fig. 2 reveals a bias-dependent transmis-
sion coefficient, illustrated in Fig. 3.
The transmission coefficient has been calculated by a
transfer matrix method using Airy functions as a basis set.The results shown in Fig. 3 clearly indicate that one
should not expect resonances in the I–V characteristics to
be concomitant with the energy levels in an unbiased
DBRT structure since the applied voltage also distorts the
band profile thus shifting the resonances.
As stated earlier, the polarization-induced internal
electric fields are expected to make the I–V characteristics
asymmetric with respect to the polarity of applied voltage.However, this is not the only reason for the asymmetric
I–V traces to occur. The structure can be highly asymmetric
because of a depletion region formed on the right (top) GaN
contact [21]. In this context, the depletion region at doping
level of Nd ¼ 1018 cm�3 is shown in Fig. 4.
In order to single out the role of polarization fields, we
present in Figs. 5 and 6 the transmission coefficient in a
highly doped structure where the depletion region is shortand somewhat irrelevant.
Figs. 5 and 6 compare and contrast tunneling with and
without polarization fields taken into account. It is,
therefore, clear that the polarization fields influence the
tunneling characteristics considerably and have notable
implications on the I–V characteristics of the GaN-based
RTDs.
Fig. 1. Band profile (eV) along the growth axis (A) and an electron
wave function in 20/20/20 A DBRT: E1 ¼ 0:136 eV, E2 ¼ 0:952 eV.
Fig. 2. Biased DBRT conduction band profile in flat band
approximation. 1) Vext ¼ 0, 2) Vext ¼ 1 V, and 3) Vext ¼ 2 V.
Fig. 3. Transmission coefficient ðLog10ðTÞÞ versus energy (eV)
calculated by a transfer matrix method. 1) Vext ¼ 0:005 V,
2) Vext ¼ 1 V, and 3) Vext ¼ 2 V.
Fig. 4. Band profile (eV) versus distance in the structure
20 A/20 A/20 A studied in [21]; Nd ¼ 1018 cm�3. 1) Vext ¼ �2 V;
2) Vext ¼ 0; and 3) Vext ¼ 2 V.
Litvinov: Resonant Tunneling in III-Nitrides
1250 Proceedings of the IEEE | Vol. 98, No. 7, July 2010
The tunneling current through the structure can be
written as
J ¼ 2q
ð2��hÞ3Zð fe � fcÞT dEz d~pk (1)
where T is the transmission coefficient and fe;c are the
electron distribution functions in bulk GaN emitter and
collector, respectively. After integration over the direc-tions of the in-plane momentum, the current takes
the form
J ¼mkqkBT
2�2�h3
Z1
0
dEz
ZymaxðEzÞ
0
dyTðEz; yÞ�ðEz; yÞ
� ¼ expðvÞ � 1
1þ expð�x� yÞ þ expðxþ yþ vÞ þ expðvÞ
x ¼ Ez � Ef
kBT; y ¼
p2k
2mkkBT; v ¼ qVext
kBT: (2)
The limits of the in-plane momentum integration ymaxðEzÞare determined by the regions where both incident and
outgoing electron moments are real.
Large depletion region shown in Fig. 4 preventstunneling from the right to the left contacts and results
in the asymmetric I–V curve as illustrated in Fig. 7.
If the top contact is doped to 5 � 1018 cm�3, the deple-
tion region becomes narrower and less relevant, polariza-
tion fields are pretty much screened, so the I–V curve
becomes almost symmetric as shown in Fig. 8.
From the theory standpoint, nothing prevents the
resonant tunneling to be observed whether the polariza-tion fields are present or not. However, the depletion
region and polarization fields may shift the NDC region
toward the higher applied voltage (see Fig. 7) that might
result in a contacts breakdown.
Fig. 5. Transmission coefficient in an unbiased DBRT structure,
flat-band approximation. 1) 10 A/20 A/10 A; 2) 20 A/20 A/20 A; and
3) 30 A/20 A/30 A.
Fig. 6. Transmission coefficient in an unbiased DBRT structure,
polarization fields included. 1) 10 A/20 A/10 A; 2) 20 A/20 A/20 A;
and 3) 30 A/20 A/30 A.
Fig. 7. I–V characteristics at various doping levels of the top GaN
contact. Mesa diameter: 75 �m, 20 A/20 A/20 A.
Litvinov: Resonant Tunneling in III-Nitrides
Vol. 98, No. 7, July 2010 | Proceedings of the IEEE 1251
III . CURRENT–VOLTAGECHARACTERISTICS
On the experimental front, the structure and the I–V
characteristics of the first GaN-based RTD’s reported in
[22] and [33] are shown in Figs. 9 and 10, respectively.
Fig. 10. illustrates the I–V curve in the RTD structure
shown in Fig. 9.
The structure shown in Fig. 9 and those reported in
[23]–[25] and [34] have been grown by plasma-assisted
molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) with purported precautionstaken in order to prevent dislocation penetration from the
metal-organic chemical vapor deposited template.
An NDC region has been reported in an MBE-grown
structure on a bulk GaN substrate [25] (see Fig. 11). It was
anticipated that the low dislocation density might help an
NDC formation.
It should be noted that the results shown in Fig. 10have not been confirmed by any other group and may
represent anomalies in contacts. Results illustrated in
Fig. 11 (curves F1–F5) do not necessarily prove the
expected resonant tunneling was observed since the peak-
to-valley ratio could not be resolved. So, the very existence
of NDC as measured and its relation to the quality of
interfaces and contacts is still controversial. It is clear that
high-quality structures are needed to minimize or prefer-ably eliminate the extraneous current so that the tunneling
process would be dominant.
The main point of confusion is that although an NDC
region in I–V traces has already been reported [22], [24],
[25], [33], it is not the only unstable behavior observed. In
some instances, the hysteresis in the I–V curve when the
voltage sweeps in opposite directions [23], [26], [34] and
Fig. 8. I–V characteristics with no polarization fields and no depletion
region. Structure 20 A/20 A/20 A, mesa diameter: 75 �m,
Nd ¼ 5 � 1018 cm�3.
Fig. 9. RTD layout (from [22] and [33]).
Fig. 10. RTD tunneling I–V characteristics (from [22] and [33]).
Fig. 11. Room-temperature I–V traces (from [25]).
Litvinov: Resonant Tunneling in III-Nitrides
1252 Proceedings of the IEEE | Vol. 98, No. 7, July 2010
current jumps [21] were clearly observable in the I–V
characteristics (see Figs. 12 and 13).
Figs. 12 and 13 show I–V traces typical for the S-typecharacteristics where current instabilities mark the NDC
regions on the horizontal voltage scale. The origin of these
instabilities as well as the reported NDC in the literature
would need to be determined.
To date, the GaN-based RTDs demonstrate quite rich
behavior in terms of the type of I–V characteristics,
which has been attributed to resonant tunneling in
polarization-distorted DBRT diodes and strong electronscattering by defects of various types. As is widely
recognized, the interface quality, dislocations, and
electron traps in the barriers strongly influence the
tunneling process. Defects in the barriers that trap orrelease electrons as the voltage sweep changes in
amplitude and polarity are assumed to be responsible
for the hysteresis in the I–V characteristics.
It should be noted that the presence of traps is not
the only possible reason for the hysteresis. Even though
the NDC region has not been explicitly observed in the
structure characterized in Figs. 10 and 11, the S-type
behavior provides for hysteresis and also implies that NDCdoes exist in the bistable region. Under an applied voltage,
the total current is not fixed as various current channels
(including leakage through electrically active threading
dislocations) may contribute to the total current when
voltage changes. In the system with S-type characteristics,
providing that the current is not fixed, the system jumps
from one stable current state to another making the NDC
region unobservable [27]. The stable states presentinhomogeneous current distributions across the device
mesa. Recently, two stable current states have been found
in another AlN/Ga/AlN device [28]. The microscopic
origin of the S-type characteristics in GaN/AlGaN-RTDs
still remains to be explained but might be associated with
both tunneling and electron heating. Electron heating is
caused by a fast electron scattering by ionized defects
accompanied by a slow phonon-assisted energy relaxation.For further information, various mechanisms of S-type
behavior in homogeneous semiconductors have been
studied in [29].
It is reasonable to expect that as high-quality bulk GaN
substrates become available, further research would most
likely be undertaken and undoubtedly shed the much
needed light and perhaps lead to NDC, which is capable of
leading to microwave oscillations.Observation of NDC or other type of instability under
dc or pseudo-dc conditions alone may not be sufficient.
Attainment of high-frequency oscillations in a cavity, for
example, would go a long way to add the much needed
credence to the NDC observations. In the quest for the
current instability region, it would be useful to fabricate
the cubic or nonpolar GaN-based structures, where
polarization fields play no role that makes possible acomparison to I-V curves in (100) GaAs RTDs. Growth of
the free-standing cubic GaN structures for various
electronic devices is discussed in [30].
If the vertical transport in GaN/AlGaN RTD was
fully understood, it would create a background for
further development of superlattice-based semiconduc-
tor high-frequency sources. Preliminary modeling and
simulation of GaN-based oscillating superlattice struc-tures and devices have been performed in [20], [31],
and [32]. h
Acknowledgment
The author thanks Prof. H. Morkoc for valuable
discussions.
Fig. 12. S-type I–V characteristics of DBRT. (a) Temperature-dependent
I–V characteristics with a heavily doped (5� 1018 cm�3) top n-GaN
layer (from [21]).
Fig. 13. S-type I–V characteristics of Fig. 9. Curve tracer image of I–V
characteristics near 1.4 V (from [21]).
Litvinov: Resonant Tunneling in III-Nitrides
Vol. 98, No. 7, July 2010 | Proceedings of the IEEE 1253
REF ERENCE S
[1] L. L. Chang, L. Esaki, and R. Tsu, BResonanttunneling in semiconductor double barriers,[Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 24, pp. 593–597, 1974.
[2] T. J. Shewchuk, P. C. Chapin, P. D. Coleman,W. Kopp, R. Ficher, and H. Morkoc,BResonant tunneling oscillations in aGaAs�AlxGa1�xAs heterostructure at roomtemperature,[ Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 46,pp. 508–510, 1985.
[3] M. Tsuchiya, H. Sakaki, and J. Yoshino, Jpn. J.Appl. Phys., vol. 24, pt. 2, p. L466, 1985.
[4] E. R. Brown, J. R. Soderstrom, C. D. Parker,L. J. Mahoney, K. M. Molvar, and T. C. McGill,BOscillations up to 712 GHz in InAs/AlSbresonant-tunneling diodes,[ Appl. Phys. Lett.,vol. 58, pp. 2291–2294, 1991.
[5] K. Ismail, B. S. Meyerson, and P. J. Wang,BElectron resonant tunneling in Si/SiGedouble barrier diodes,[ Appl. Phys. Lett.,vol. 59, pp. 973–976, 1991.
[6] D. Lippens, P. Mounaix, V. Sadaune,M. A. Poisson, and C. Brylinski, BResonanttunneling of holes in Ga0:51In0:49P=GaAsdouble-barrier heterostructures,[ J. Appl.Phys., vol. 71, pp. 2057–2061, 1992.
[7] U. Lunz, M. Keim, G. Reuscher, F. Fischer,K. Schull, A. Waag, and G. Landwehr,BResonant electron tunneling in ZnSe/BeTedouble-barrier, single-quantum-wellheterostructures,[ J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80,p. 6329, 1996.
[8] M. Watanabe, Y. Iketani, and M. Asada,BEpitaxial growth and electricalcharacteristics of CaF2/Si/CaF2 resonanttunneling diode structures grown on Si(111)substrate,[ Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 39,pp. L964–L967, 2000.
[9] M. A. Reed, R. J. Koestner, andM. W. Goodwin, BResonant tunnelingthrough a HgTe=Hg1�xCdxTe double barrier,single quantum well heterostructure,[ Appl.Phys. Lett., vol. 49, p. 1293, 1986.
[10] J. H. Smet, T. P. E. Broekaert, andC. G. Fonstad, BPeak-to-valley current ratiosas high as 50:1 at room temperature inpseudomorphic In0:53Ga0:47As=AlAs=InAsresonant tunneling diodes,[ J. Appl. Phys.,vol. 71, p. 2475, 1992.
[11] E. Schomburg, R. Scheuerer, S. Brandl,K. F. Renk, D. G. Pavel’ev, Y. Koschurinov,V. Ustinov, A. Zhukov, A. Kovsch, andP. S. Kop’ev, BInGaAs/InAlAs superlatticeoscillator at 147 GHz,[ Electron. Lett., vol. 35,pp. 1491–1492, 1999.
[12] Schomburg, S. Brandl, K. Hofbeck,T. Bloemeier, J. Grenzer, A. A. Ignatov,
K. F. Renk, D. G. Pavel’ev, Y. Koschurinov,V. Ustinov, A. Zhukov, A. Kovsch, S. Ivanov,and P. S. Kop’ev, BGeneration of millimeterwaves with a GaAs/AlAs superlatticeoscillator,[ Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 72,pp. 1498–1500, 1998.
[13] H. Morkoc, Handbook on NitrideSemiconductors and Devices. New York:Wiley-VCH, 2008.
[14] O. Ambacher, BGrowth and applications ofGroup III-nitrides,[ J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.,vol. 31, pp. 2653–2710, 1998.
[15] A. P. Zhang, F. Ren, T. J. Anderson,C. R. Abernathy, R. K. Singh, P. H. Holloway,S. J. Pearton, D. Palmer, and G. E. McGuire,BHigh-power GaN electronic devices,[ Crit.Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., vol. 27, p. 1, 2002.
[16] P. Deb, T. Westover, and H. Kim, BFieldemission from GaN and (Al,Ga)N/GaNnanorod heterostructures,[ J. Vac. Sci.Technol., vol. B25, pp. L15–L18, 2007.
[17] K. Indlekofer, E. Dona, J. Malindretos,M. Bertelli, M. Koan, A. Rizzi, and H. Luth,BModelling of polarization charge-inducedasymmetry of I-V characteristics ofAlN/GaN-based resonant tunnellingstructures,[ Phys. Stat. Sol., vol. B234,pp. 769–772, 2002.
[18] F. Sacconi, A. D. Carlo, and P. Lugli,BModeling of GaN-based resonant tunnelingdiodes: Influence of polarization fields,[ Phys.Stat. Sol., vol. A190, pp. 295–299, 2002.
[19] A. N. Razzhuvalov and S. N. Grinyaev, BAcapacitor model of the hysteresis of tunnelingin GaN/AlGaN(00010 structures,[ Phys. SolidState, vol. 51, pp. 189–201, 2009.
[20] V. I. Litvinov, A. Manasson, and D. Pavlidis,BShort-period intrinsic Stark GaN/AlGaNsuperlattice as a Bloch oscillator,[ Appl. Phys.Lett., vol. 85, pp. 600–602, 2004.
[21] J. Lee, Q. Fan, X. Ni, U. Ozgur, V. I. Litvinov,and H. Morkoc, BInvestigation of verticalcurrent-voltage characteristics ofAl(Ga)N/GaN RTD-like heterostructures,[ inProc. SPIE, 2009, vol. 7216, p. 72160S.
[22] A. Kikuchi, R. Bannai, and K. Kishino,BAlGaN resonant tunneling diodes grown byRF-MBE,[ Phys. Stat. Sol. (A), vol. 188,pp. 187–190, 2001.
[23] C. T. Foxon, S. V. Novikov, A. E. Belyaev,L. X. Zhao, O. Makarovsky, D. J. Walker,L. Eaves, R. I. Dykeman, S. V. Danylyuk,S. A. Vitusevich, M. J. Kappers, J. S. Barnard,and C. J. Humphreys, BCurrent-voltageinstabilities in GaN/AlGaN resonanttunneling structures,[ Phys. Stat. Sol. (C),pp. 2389–2392, 2003, 0.
[24] M. Hermann, E. Monroy, A. Helman, B. Baur,M. Albrecht, B. Daudin, O. Ambacher,M. Stutzmann1, and M. Eickhoff, BVerticaltransport in group III-nitride heterostructuresand application in AlN/GaN resonanttunneling diodes,[ Phys. Stat. Sol. (C), vol. 1,pp. 2210–2227, 2004.
[25] S. Golka, C. Pflugl, W. Schrenk, G. Strasser,C. Skierbiszewski, M. Siekacz, I. Grzegory,and S. Porowski, BNegative differentialresistance in dislocation-free GaN/AlGaNdouble-barrier diodes grown on bulk GaN,[Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 88, p. 172106, 2006.
[26] M. V. Petrychuk, A. E. Belyaev, A. M. Kurakin,S. V. Danylyuk, N. Klein, and S. A. Vitusevicha,BMechanisms of current formation inresonant tunneling AlN/GaN heterostructures,[Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 91, p. 222112, 2007.
[27] A. F. Volkov, Comment on zero resistance stateand the photon assisted transport, 2003, arXiv:cond-mat/0302615v2
[28] S. Leconte, S. Golka, G. Pozzovivo, G. Strasser,T. Remmele, M. Albrecht, and E. Monroy,BBi-stable behaviour in GaN-based resonanttunnelling diode structures,[ Phys. Stat.Sol. (C), vol. 5, pp. 431–434, 2008.
[29] A. F. Volkov and S. M. Kogan, BPhysicalphenomena in semiconductors with negativedifferential conductivity,[ Sov. Phys. Uspekhi,vol. 11, pp. 881–903, 1969.
[30] S. V. Novikov, N. M. Stanton, R. P. Campion,C. T. Foxon, and A. J. Kent, BFree-standingzinc-blende (cubic) GaN layers andsubstrates,[ J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 310,pp. 3964–3967, 2008.
[31] I. Gordion, A. Manasson, and V. I. Litvinov,BElectrical domains and sub-millimeter signalgeneration in AlGaN/GaN superlattices,[IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 53, p. 1294,2006.
[32] V. I. Litvinov, V. A. Manasson, andL. Sadovnik, BGaNVBased terahertz source,[in Proc. SPIE Terahertz Gigahertz Electron.Photon. II, 2000, vol. 4111, pp. 116–123.
[33] A. Kikuchi, R. Bannai, K. Kishino, C. M. Lee,and J. I. Chyi, BAlN/GaN double-barrierresonant tunneling diode grown byRF-plasma-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy,[Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 81, pp. 1729–1731, 2002.
[34] A. E. Belyaev, C. T. Foxon, S. V. Novikov,O. Makarovsky, L. Eaves, M. J. Kappers, andC. J. Humphreys, BComment on AlN/GaNdouble-barrier resonant tunneling diodesgrown by rf-plasma-assisted molecula-beamepitaxy,[ Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 83,pp. 3626–3627, 2003.
ABOUT THE AUT HOR
Vladimir I. Litvinov (Member, IEEE) received the Ph.D. degree in solid
state theory from Chernovtsy University, Ukraine, and the Habilitation
degree in physics and mathematics from the Institute of Physics, Estonian
Academy of Science, Tartu.
In 1978, he became Head of the Theoretical Laboratory, Institute of
Material Science Problems, Academy of Science of Ukraine. In 1996–
1999, he was a Senior Research Associate at the Department of
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston,
IL. He joined Sierra Nevada Corporation in 1999. His areas of
expertise include theory and modeling in semiconductor physics, III–V,
and IV–VI semiconductor optoelectronic devices, superlattices, metal-
lic magnetic multilayers, and millimeter-wave devices and antennas.
He has served as the Principal Investigator on projects supported by
the U.S. Air Force, SOCOM, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, NASA, and MDA. He
has authored or coauthored over 150 publications and conference
papers.
Dr. Litvinov is a member of the American Physical Society and Material
Research Society.
Litvinov: Resonant Tunneling in III-Nitrides
1254 Proceedings of the IEEE | Vol. 98, No. 7, July 2010