Richard Rickett, General Manager Engineering and Procurement - March 2015
Case Study
Case Study :Diverless Fast Track
Repair of Mooring System
3DOF Subsea
Introduction
• ~ 300 floating production units in use around the world
• Design = maximise uptime = minimise disconnection/reconnection=> need to withstand fairly extreme weather conditions
• Analysis based on historical environmental data• However - weather is inherently unpredictable and expected limits can be exceeded
• Potential early deterioration of mooring system components or at worst, failure of single or multiple mooring lines.
• Very few have facilities to detect early warning signs of deterioration or impending failure
• Regular inspection campaigns carried out to confirm integrity of mooring system
• Not uncommon for the early signs of failure to be detected during routine inspection
4DOF Subsea
Mooring System Early Failures
• Many single line failures• Several examples of multiple line failures (wire, chain and/or connections)• Major component failures (yoke, wire, chain, connections)• Vessel drift-off• Subsea hardware and risers damaged or broken, catastrophic failure
RegularInspection
Repair prior to failure
Failure
Inspect damage
Repair
Planned $$ Emergency $$$$$
3-6 months
on station / off-station
• Located 80km off the coast of South Taranaki, New Zealand, at the entry to the Cook Strait
• Largest crude oil field in New Zealand• Contributes significantly to the economy and
development of the Taranaki region.
DOF Subsea 5
Case Study - Maari Oil Field
DOF Subsea 6
Maari field consists of :
• Subsea wells, flowlines & control umbilicals• Maari wellhead platform• FPSO Raroa, 8 leg mooring system
Water depth approx. 100m
DOF Subsea 7
Each mooring leg comprises :
• Driven anchor pile• Lower 118mm chain section 50m• Lower 110mm wire section 200m / 400m / 500m• Upper 118mm chain section 400m• Upper 110mm wire section 200m
Chain : 118mm studless linksWire : 110mm spiral strand uncoated wire rope
• In February 2013, a 5-year ABS inspection programme was carried out by DOF Subsea Diving Support Vessel Skandi Singapore
• Survey included an ROV survey of the 8 mooring legs• Bird-caging of spiral strand wire mooring rope was observed on mooring legs 1, 2, 3 & 4• Considered likely to effect the capacity of the mooring legs• Subsequent to the inspection, the Upper Wire Section on mooring leg No. 2 parted• Temporary mooring leg installed in Aug 2013 by others
Mooring wire anomalies
Timeline Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Anomalies identified in this area
DOF Subsea 9
Cut & add chain
Cut & reterminate
10
• Letter of Intent for engineering signed end July 2013• Procedure and tooling review held early August• Method statement developed, design loads calculated – 65-150 tonnes• Design based on 3m significant wave height limit• Concept developed based on an existing (lower capacity) tool previously accepted by the
classification society :
Existing tool (10t pull capacity) New concept (150t pull capacity)
• Orders for long lead hydraulic parts placed immediately
Engineering of Solution
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov DecTimeline
DOF Subsea 11
Engineering of Solution
• Fabrication of tool awarded to a New Zealand company (New Plymouth)
• Close to port of mobilisation• Fabrication commenced end Aug 2013• Tool completed in 4 weeks• Load and function testing completed 7 weeks after
contract award)
Fabrication
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov DecTimeline
DOF Subsea 13
• Built : 2010• Length : 108 m• Beam : 24 m• DP : Class 2• Bollard Pull : 350 t• Chain locker capacity : 1150 m3• Triple drum main winch : 500 t• Heave compensated crane : 140 t• 2 off safe Deck rail cranes : 5t• A-frame : 250 t• Clear Deck Area : 1,070 m2• Accommodation : 90 personnel• ROVs: inbuilt 3,000 m work class ROV + overside
work class ROV (Schilling UHD)
Execution - Skandi Hercules
DOF Subsea 14
• Depth rating : 3,000 m• Power : 150 HP• Payload capacity : 400 kg• Through frame lift : 3,500 kg• Manipulators :
• 7-function Titan T4• 5-function Rigmaster
Execution – Schilling UHD ROVs
Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mobilisation - Skandi Hercules
• Vessel contract signed mid August 2013• Hercules mobilised in Singapore 3 weeks later• Constructability Review held early September• Vessel arrived in New Plymouth NZ end September• Final risk assessment held early October
Timeline
• Identify location for Upper Chain Section cut subsea• Lift chain section into cutting stand• Cut chain with ROV carbide blade cutter
DOF Subsea 16
Repair Methodology
cut location
• Recover FPSO end upper chain section and upper wire section
• Store chain section in vessel chain lockers
DOF Subsea 17
Repair Methodology
• Fit recovery clamp to wire• Recover wire to deck & secure• Cut & remove damaged wire• Clean wire end• Re-terminate with new wire socket
DOF Subsea 18
Repair Methodology
• Reconnect chain to repaired Upper Wire Section• Deploy chain until end is reached• Fit end of chain through ACCD stroking tool skid and secure in place
DOF Subsea 19
Repair Methodology
• Deploy chain and ACCD tool to seabed
DOF Subsea 20
Repair Methodology
• Recover other end of mooring line to deck• Attach new length of chain section• Lay end of chain into ANC ACCD tool• Fit H-link to end of chain
DOF Subsea 21
Repair Methodology
• Deploy chain and ANC ACCD tool to seabed• Connect 20m tether lines between HYD and ANC
DOF Subsea 22
Repair Methodology
• Connect hydraulic downline• Connect crane to chain end• Stroke tool (varied 5- 30m) & recover chain
DOF Subsea 23
Repair Methodology
• Once sufficient slack is pulled through, lower chain end link into H-link• Insert H-link pin• Attach locknut.
DOF Subsea 24
Repair Methodology
• Release load from ANC tool, remove tethers• Slide ACCD tool off carriages• Recover ACCD tool to deck, recover carriages to deck
DOF Subsea 25
Repair Methodology
• Remove pins to release ACCD ANC tool• Lift chain off tool• Recover ACCD ANC tool to deck
DOF Subsea 26
Repair Methodology
All tooling is recovered, leaving only H-links and anchor shackles in the chain leg
DOF Subsea 27
Repair Methodology
Challenges - Range of Weather
DOF Subsea 28
Leg 2 : 7.5d ops + 6.5d WOW, FPSO in place.Leg 3 : 4d ops + 1d WOWLeg 1 : ~4d ops + 1d WOWLeg 4 : 2.5d ops, no weather downtime.
Challenges – Visibility at the Seabed
DOF Subsea 29
Challenges - first leg repaired with FPSO in place
DOF Subsea 30
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov
2013 Final risk assessment
Constructability Review
Skandi Hercules mobilised in Singapore
Vessel contract signed
Tooling review
Engineering awarded
Engineering
Tool fabrication
Tool testing
Mobilisation in Taranaki, New Zealand
Offshore works 1 month
Performance - Timeline
Complete14/11/2013
Award31/07/2013
DOF Subsea 31
Learning curve‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Performance - Safety
DOF Subsea 32
• 1 non-work related injury (rolled ankle climbing out of bunk while vessel in harbour)• 1 first aid case – small cut to finger while cleaning under shelving• Significant amount of deck work• All work performed without divers
DOF Subsea 33
Key Success Factors
• Proper detailed Engineering assessment
• Competent and experienced team, onshore and offshore
• Preparation – testing, trial fits, site integration tests
• Right assets
Conclusion
DOF Subsea 34
Fast track repair of FPSO mooring legs can be carried out safely and effectively, without the use of divers, and with the FPSO in place.
DOF Subsea wish to recognise and thank OMV New Zealand Limited for permitting the use of the material contained within this presentation.
DOF Subsea 35
Acknowledgements
DOF Subsea 36
Questions ?
Thank you