Digital Map fromDr. William Bowen California State University Northridge
Sacramento-San Joaquin
DeltaSan Joaquin
River
Sacramento River
Suisun Bay
San Francisco
1
2
Stationary Habitat ---Geometry
Dynamic Habitat ---Hydrodynamics, ocean conditions, weather
Environment
Biological Conditions
3
Estuarine habitat conceptual model(Peterson 2003)
Stationary Habitat
Dynamic Habitat
Production AreaTidal and River Flow
PelagicRecruitment
4
Hydrology
Delta Geometry
Water Demand
Exports
Delta Hydrodynamics
Realized Habitat
Potential Habitat
Biological and Chemical Conditions
5
Tides
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500
0
5
10
15
O N D J F M A M J J A S
Day of Water Year
W D
1983 1977 1998 1991 1995 1992 1982 1990 1958 1994 (1997)
Dry Years
Wet Years
Fres
hwat
er F
low
(m3 s
-1)
Variability of Freshwater Delta Inflow
6
7
Pelagic organisms follow salinity:The copepod Eurytemora affinis
Kimmerer 1998
40 50 60 70 80 90 10040
50
60
70
80
90
100
110 1:1 Regression Line
X2 (km)
Pos
ition
of P
eak
(km
)
8X2 (km)
1009080706050
100
90
80
70
60
50
X2
Cente
r of dis
trib
ution
1:1
Pelagic organisms follow salinity: Delta smelt
9
0 10 20 300
20
40
60
80
100Delta smelt
Shiner
perch
Thr. shadAm. shad
Striped bass
Chinook salmon
YF goby
Starry flounder
Longfin smelt
Salinity
C
umul
ativ
e P
erce
nt
Staghorn sculpin
Splittail
Most fishes follow salinities
Kimmerer 2004
Marine species
10
1967-871988-2000
1982-2000 (DS)All Years
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
0
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
0
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
50 60 70 80 90
0
1
2
3
50 60 70 80 90
-2
-1
0
1
Bay Shrimp
Striped BassSplittail
Longfin smeltDelta smelt
Herring Am. Shad
Flounder
Log
Abu
ndan
ce o
r S
urvi
val
X2 (km)High Flow Low FlowSource:
Kimmerer 2002MEPS
Higher trophic levels show many
relationships of abundance to
freshwater flow
11X2 (km)
0
1
2
0
1
2
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
50 60 70 80 90
2
3
4
5
50 60 70 80 90-2-1012
Mysid
Copepod: Spring
Copepod: Summer
Rotifer: Summer
Chlorophyll: SummerChlorophyll: Spring
Log
Abu
ndan
ce
X2(km)
High Flow Low Flow
Lower trophic levels show few relationships
of abundance to freshwater flow
Source:Kimmerer 2002 MEPS
1972-19871988-2000
12
X2 (km)
1873 Delta:
Long residence time
Marsh connections
Two rivers connect to bay
Waterways dendritic
13
Modern delta
Short residence times
Rip-rapped
Cross Delta flows
Rare San Joaquin connection to bay
Waterways web-like14
What Changes As Flow Increases?
X2Location of Any Salinity
RangeLSZ
Salinity and X2
FLOW
15
stratification
Proportion
Diverted
What Changes As Flow Increases?
Delta
Residence Time
RiverStage,Velocity
River
stage and
velocity
Floodplain
inundation
16
FLOW
FLOW
Upstream
bottom current
Nutrients
Contaminants
Organic matter
Sediment
What Changes As Flow Increases?
Concentrations
Loadings
17
FLOW
FLOW
What Changes As Flow Increases?
Adult spawners move up:SalmonGreen and White
SturgeonLongfin smeltDelta smeltSplittailAmerican shadPacific herring
Young Marine fish move up:Starry flounderWhite croakerPacific halibut
Young fish move down:SalmonLongfin smeltDelta smeltSplittailAmerican shadStriped bass
18
19
Flows are important but so is geometry
1. Environmental flows are more than just volumes of inflows and outflows
2. Recent flow regimes both harm native species and encourage non-native species
3. Flow is a major determinant of habitat and transport4. Recent Delta environmental flows are insufficient to support
native Delta fishes for today’s habitats5. A strong science program and a flexible management
regime are essential to improving flow criteria
Five Key Points
20
+
-
Nutrients
Organic matter
Sediment
Fish
Proportion
Diverted
What Changes As Flow Increases?
X2
-Delta
Residence Time
-River
Stage,Velocity
+
Location of Any Salinity
Range
-Salinity
At a
Point
LSZ
21
Delta smelt habitat abundance in relation to X2
22
Fish
Production
Benthic
Production
Zooplankton
Production
Microbial
Production
Phytoplankton
Production
Nutrient
Input
Organic
InputInputs
Hydrodynamic Forcing:
Freshwater inflowOceanic variability
Wind
Stratification
Transport/
Retention
Physical
Habitat
Physical
forcing
mechanisms
Material flows
Direct
physical
influences
Key
feedback
loop
Conceptual Model:Physical effects on estuarine ecosystem
23