Date post: | 25-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nandini-priya-t |
View: | 16 times |
Download: | 1 times |
TOD Phase I Pilot Projects
Corridor I: NANGLOI - TIKRI KALAN
The Site in context
The Site in context
The Site in context
India Gate
Shah Jahanabad
Rohin
i
Dwark
a
Najafgar
h
Mundka
Industria
l
Corridor
Towards
Bahadurgarh
Delhi Border
The Site in context
Railway Line
Rohtak Road
Zone N Zone M
Zone K-
I
Zone L
Zone Total Area
(Ha)
Existing Pop
(In Lakh) ZDP Pop (In Lakh)
Designed Work force
(In Lakh)
L 22979 2.35 20 6.4
K-1 6515 5 12 4.56
M 5524 2.84 9.8 3.82
N 13975 3.5 24.17 9.42
The Site in numbers – total area
TOD Intense
Zone
- 342.5 Ha
TOD
Standard
Zone
- 662.5 Ha
NMT Zone
- 3181.6 Ha
Mundka
Rajd
hani
Park
Nanglo
i R
ailw
ay
Sta
tion
Pro
posed S
tation
1 P
roposed S
tation
2 P
roposed S
tation
3
8%
16%
76%
The Site in numbers – total area
Land Use
Area in Catchment
(In Ha)
Built up areas (In Ha)
(@40%) MPD-FAR
Total Built Up (In Ha) Total Pop.
Commercial 263.5 105.4 100.00 105.4 105,400
(@10sq.m. per person)
Source:NBC2005
Public & Semi Public 519.2 207.68 150.00 311.52 207,680
(@15sq.m. per person)
Source:NBC2005
Industrial (Predominantly
storage) 72.45 28.98 180.00 52.16 17,388
(@30sq.m. per person)
Source:NBC2005
Total working population 4,13,085
Utility 61.79
Recreational 273.14
Buffer 328.58
Agriculture 37.52
Land Use Area in Catchment
(In Ha) ZDP density
PPH Workforce
ratio Total Pop. Work Force Population
Residential (L) 271.37 250.00 0.32 67,842.50 21,709.60
Residential (K-1) 606.54 250.00 0.38 151,635.00 57,621.30
Residential (M) 25.71 250.00 0.39 6,427.50 2,506.73
Residential (N) 250.45 250.00 0.39 62,612.50 24,418.88
Total Population 2,88,517 1,06,256
12,90,800
The Site in numbers –developed area
Developed
Land
2087.7Ha
55%
Virgin Land
1677.7
Ha
45%
The Site in numbers – land utilization
Existing
dense
1233.5Ha
Existing
under-utilized
685.5Ha
Existing
green field
1677.7Ha
Restricted
168.7Ha
The Site in numbers – character districts
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Dense residential
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Urban Villages
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Slum/ JJ Colonies
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Banquet Halls
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Warehouses
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Industrial/ utility
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
Character district– Green field
Dense
Resi.
Ware-
houses
Urban
Village
Indust/
Utility
Railwa
y yard
Gree
n
field
Slum/
JJ
Colony
Banquet
Halls
The Site in numbers – ZDP uses
Land Use}
Area in Catchment (In Ha)
Residential 1,154
Commercial 263
Public & Semi Public 519
Industrial (Predominantly storage) 72
Utility 61
Recreational 273
Buffer 328
Agriculture 37
Existing building use
Predominant existing use zones
Update
Density & Social Infrastructure
Infrastructure provision
Accessibility & Movement –ZDP Roads
Accessibility & Movement – pedestrian accessibility
1.0 OPEN SPACE AND WATER STRATEGY
1.1. Zero Additional Run off
NATURE
10%
RUNOFF
100% Permeable
URBANISED CONDITION
80% Impermeable Surface
NATURALISED CONDITION
55 %
RUNOFF
10 %
RUNOFF
50% Impermeable Surface
with detention areas.
Slope Analysis
Lowest points (valleys) of the area
Open Space Structure of the Plan derived from Nature
Current ZDP greens are disconnected: Do not allow water to be conveyed Naturally
Interconnected Open Space Network allows linking of Greens
Boston Emerald Necklace
• Continuous infiltration & movement of Stormwater
• Movement of people on foot & cycle.
34
35
Disconnected open spaces are hindering formation of ecological corridors as
well as natural systems that could be used for storm water management.
Connected Open Spaces to move Water and People!
1.4. NMT network & open space structure
4.2. ZDP- Road Network
4.2. Proposed- Road Network
4.2. NMT along ZDP Roads
4.2. Proposed augmentation of NMT Network
3.0 EQUITY in CONNECTIVITY
4.2. Access to Public Transport for Slum/ JJ Colonies
New boulevard Connections
4.2. Major Civic Boulevard connecting communities
Everyone lives on Akbar Road!
1.4. Democratic Boulevards
Imli (Tamarind) Trees on Akbar Road in April & February. (Source: Trees of Delhi)
Everyone lives on Akbar Road!
4.2. Reinventing UER
Proposed
Existing
Park along road UER
UER Buffer Buffer
2.0 DENSIFICATION vs. SPRAWL
2.1. Urban Sprawl as per ZDP
2.1. Densification as per TOD regulations
Golden Gate Park, SF
Central Park, NY
Proposed Regional Park, Mundka
Giving the City a Regional Public Park
India Gate, Delhi
Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park
Japanese Tea garden
Children's’ Park
Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park
Renzo Piano Museum
Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park
Stow Lake
Scale comparison: Golden Gate Park
An Urban Forestway…
4.0 PROGRAMMING CONSIDERATIONS
4.1. Impact of ZDP- Learning From The Past
Slum/ JJ colonies along ecological areas
Future land prices might result in encroach-ment along sensitive areas
4.1. Gated Communities- Patparganj
4.1. Gated Communities- Patparganj
Civic Buffer with Open Space & Water bodies
4.1. Gated Parks
4.1. Unused Parks
Inequity due to Gated Communities
7
KEY PLAN
Streets as incidental Public Spaces & Play
Areas
4.1. Future Trends
Slum/ JJ colonies along ecological areas
Future land prices might result in encroach-ment along sensitive areas
4.1. Lal Dora villages
4.1. Lal Dora villages
The way forward
Influence Zone Plan Preparation
An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components A Detailed Influence Zone Plan shall be prepared by the Planning Authority to set the Vision for development of the area, based on various site characteristics.
1. Urban Design Framework
2. Transport Impact Assessment & Mitigation Strategies
3. Decentralized Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan
4. Economic Viability and Implementation Model - Ensuring Equity
An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components
2. Transport Impact Assessment & Mitigation Strategies:
a. Achieving the desired modal shift, in particular mode shift for short trips
b. Street network improvement through assessment of existing capacity and augmentation of network as required through new linkages, alternate routes, junction designs etc for all modes with priority for public transport, pedestrians, cyclists / NMT.
c. Integrated strategy for Public transport, Pedestrian and Cycle access
d. Determining the optimum mix of uses to mitigate negative impact on surrounding land uses and transport networks
e. Parking Strategy as a Demand Management Tool
f. Mitigation strategies for traffic noise and vibration
An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components
3. Decentralized Infrastructure and Sustainability Plan:
a. Water and Waste Water management strategy including recycling and re-use of
waste water. To include strategy for both potable and non-potable water.
b. Rain water strategy, to be integrated with the Landscape and Public Open Space
Strategy
c. Solid Waste Management Strategy
d. Energy Strategy maximising use of renewable sources
e. Integrated Infrastructure and Services Systems Plan indicating space requirements
for all infrastructure
An Influence Zone Plan – 4 critical components 4. Economic Viability and Implementation Model :
a. Determining a financially profitable mix of uses based on the current demand and supply, coupled with the projected land values for the TOD zone. To include cost
delivering of Social and Physical infrastructure
b. Determining a financial model and delivery mechanism for affordable housing, public infrastructure and public transport facilities through mechanisms of cross
subsidy, FAR benefits or any other possible benefit that the TOD authority can give.
c. Strategy for revenue collection from the TOD zone based on the benefits enjoyed by a piece of land lying within the TOD zone. To determine total profit generated from the TOD Zone in a phased manner for individual owners, consortiums and TOD
administration.
d. Determining appropriate mechanisms for land-pooling by individual plot holders to
avail the benefits of TOD, based on the specific characteristics of the site.
e. Determining the structure of the administrative body of the TOD zone and the cost
of operation of the body.
f. Strategy for implementing the TOD policy in the TOD zone through the principle of
award and penalty.
Influence Zone Plan Preparation – 3 months
1. With the aim to prepare a robust and deliverable Influence Zone Plan and draw conclusive policy recommendations, UTTIPEC has put-together a multi-disciplinary expert team of professional consultants for Transport Impact Assessment, Sustainable Infrastructure provision and Economic Feasibility to augment in-house skills and capacity
2. Detailed proposals from the best consultants from both within & outside the country
3. Request for sponsorship from Corporate Houses, Institutions and other Public bodies due to paucity of time
4. Letter of appeal
5. GSDl data & analysis