+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT...

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT...

Date post: 31-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: ashly-better
View: 214 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
24
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA) Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap
Transcript
Page 1: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF

• PI/DEPARTMENT;

• OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP);

• GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA);

• MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II

Salary Cap

Page 2: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS) BUDGET SIGNED

ON DECEMBER 23, 2011 INCLUDES A REDUCTION IN THE SALARY CAP

FROM EXECUTIVE LEVEL I ($199,700) TO EXECUTIVE LEVEL II

($179,700) FOR FY2012 AWARDS WHERE THE INITIAL ISSUE DATE OF THE AWARD IS ON/AFTER 12/23/2011

Issue - Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level

II Salary Cap

Page 3: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

 Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

Agenda Brief overview

What that means for the UW

Actions taken to date

Roles & responsibilities Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP)

Grant & Contract Accounting (GCA)

Management Accounting & Analysis (MAA)

PI/Department

Page 4: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

Overview "None of the funds appropriated in this title shall

be used to pay the salary of an individual, through a grant or other extramural mechanism, at a rate in excess of Executive Level II.“

Affects all ‘funding’ actions Does not affect No Cost Extensions Not based on grant start date Requires institutions to be able to deal with

concurrent caps

Page 5: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

Overview (cont’d) Agencies impacted:

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services

Administration (SAMHSA) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Centers for Disease Control (CDC)

Note – CDC and HRSA not previously subject to salary cap

Page 6: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

What does this mean for the UW? Need to absorb additional salary cap cost sharing Need to identify ways to determine applicable cap by

budget Changing budget numbers under certain circumstances Potential for multiple caps for faculty during an FEC

cycle Clear coordination among OSP, GCA, MAA,

PI/Departments Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for above

organizations Potential change to eFECS to accommodate multiple

caps

Page 7: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

Actions taken to date Identification of Grant Flag 08 to distinguish correct

salary cap for qualifying budgets Value of ‘1’ represents Executive Level I salary cap ($199,700) Value of ‘2’ represents Executive Level II salary cap ($179,700) Value of ‘7’ represents Other Salary Cap (agency specific not tied to

Executive Level salary cap) Value of ‘9’ represents No Salary Cap Applies (CDC and HRSA not

previously subject to a salary cap but now subject to Executive Level II)

Initial upload for populating Grant Flag 08 (Based on Start Date of 1/1/2012. Let MAA/GCA know if incorrect)

Identified roles & responsibilities of units based on ‘least’ amount of administrative effort

Page 8: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

Roles and Responsibilities PI/Administering Department are responsible

for Ensuring proper salary amounts and distributions are

made to sponsored budgets. Includes reviewing budgets to make sure the direct

charged salary and cost shared salary, including salary cap cost sharing, is correct

Making the necessary adjustments if they are not When adjustments required it is especially important

to make them within each Faculty Effort Certification (FEC) cycle so each FEC captures correct level of effort averaged across the reporting period.

Page 9: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Executive Level II Salary Cap

Roles and Responsibilities (cont’d) Management Accounting & Analysis will:

Continue to perform monthly batch processes to populate Grant Flag 08 for awards from these agencies which are subject to the Executive Level II salary cap, advising campus when complete.

Awards not included in the monthly batch process for populating Grant Flag 08: DHHS awards subject to Executive Level I salary cap

which require a value of ‘1’ Awards from non-DHHS agencies which require a value of

‘7’ CDC/HRSA awards not subject to salary cap which require

a value of ‘9’

Page 10: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap New Awards, Non-Competing

Continuations

New Awards, Non-Competing Continuations (non SNAP) & Other Sponsor Awards (Issue Date on or after 12/23/2011):  Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP)

 NIH/SAMHSA/AHRQ/HRSA/CDC – Budget subject to former EL I salary cap (excludes CDC & HRSA), enter

“Subject to the EL I salary cap” in Comments section of Funding Action (FA) form.

For CDC or HRSA budgets NOT subject to salary cap, enter “Not Subject to salary cap” in Comments section of Funding Action (FA) form.

For budget subject to new EL II salary cap, no comment is entered

Other Sponsor Awards, e.g., DoD, American Heart, with salary cap restrictions –Enter “Subject to salary cap (insert salary cap specifics)” in Comments section of Funding Action (FA) form. If agency policy tied to DHHS salary cap, cite appropriate EL I or II.

Page 11: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap New Awards, Non-Competing Continuations

(cont’d)

New Awards, Non-Competing Continuations (non SNAP) & Other Sponsor Awards (cont’d):  Grant & Contract Accounting (GCA)

 NIH/SAMHSA/AHRQ/HRSA/CDC -

If Comments section of FA reflects “Subject to the EL I salary cap”, assign value of ‘1’ in Grant Flag 08 of the FAS Budget Index.

For CDC and HRSA, if Comments section of FA reflects “Not Subject to salary cap”, assign the value of ‘9’ in Grant Flag 08 of the FAS Budget Index.

Other Sponsor Awards, e.g., DoD, American Heart, with salary cap restrictions – When setting up new budget, if Comments section of A reflects “Subject to salary cap (insert salary cap specifics)”:

Assign value of ‘1’ in Grant Flag 08 of FAS Budget Index if salary cap is EL I,

Assign value of ‘2’ in Grant Flag 08 of FAS Budget Index if salary cap is EL II,

Assign value of ‘7’ in Grant Flag 08 of FAS Budget Index if salary cap is other than EL I or II

Page 12: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapRoles & Responsibilities (cont’d)

New Awards, Non-Competing Continuations (non SNAP) & Other Sponsor Awards (cont’d): Management Accounting & Analysis (MAA)

MAA will perform monthly query to identify qualifying DHHS awards (NIH/SAMHSA/AHRQ/HRSA/CDC) which do not reflect a coded value for Grant Flag 08.

The Grant Flag 08 for these budgets will be coded as ‘2’ to classify them as “subject to Executive Level II salary cap”.

Page 13: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap SNAP Awards

SNAP Awards (Issue Date on or after 12/23/2011) - When new funds subject to EL II are received on a SNAP award previously subject to EL I:

They will be added to the existing budget and the Grant Flag 08 changed from a value of ‘1’ to a value of ‘2’ unless a new sub-budget is requested by the department before the FA is processed by OSP.

If a sub-budget is requested it will be used for the new dollars only.  Any remaining balance in the prior period will stay in the original budget to be expended down.

To avoid unnecessary use of sub-budgets requests should be limited to instances when the new funding is: Associated with a project originally subject to the EL I salary cap

The new funds are subject to EL II salary cap

PI/department intends to pay individual(s) exceeding the EL II salary cap

Page 14: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapSNAP Awards

Sub-budget NOT requested: OSP

For established budgets, Grant Flag 08 should already show ‘1’ because these budgets were coded as part of MAA’s original batch process.

If exception and the new funds are subject to the former EL I cap, OSP will reflect “Subject to the EL I salary cap” in the Comments section of the Funding Action (FA) form.

GCA Change Grant Flag 08 to reflect a value of ‘2’ as a part of the process

when adding new funds to the existing budget

MAA – No action required PI/Department – Responsible for managing salary cap cost sharing

within budget which now combines Executive Level I and Executive Level II salaries (note, FEC reports covering the period of change will reflect salary cap cost sharing based on Executive Level II for the entire FEC period regardless of the effective date of the new funding).

Page 15: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapSNAP Awards (Cont’d)

Sub-budget requested: OSP

For established budgets, Grant Flag 08 should already show ‘1’ because these budgets were coded as part of MAA’s original batch process.

Continuation funding will default to EL II via the MAA upload process as noted in I.c. above.

If exception and new funds subject to the former EL I cap, OSP will reflect “Subject to the EL I salary cap” in the Comments section of the Funding Action (FA) form.

Page 16: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapSNAP Awards (Cont’d)

Sub-budget requested (cont’d): GCA

Set up a new sub-budget for the new dollars only. 

Remaining balance for prior period will remain in the prior period budget and be expended from that budget.

No action required for Grant Flag 08 as this will be populated through the MAA process.

MAA - Populate Grant Flag 08 with the value of ‘2’ as part of the monthly batch process described earlier.

PI/Department - One month after budget has been established, verify Grant Flag 08 is accurately coded. If code is absent or incorrect, email [email protected] to request action. Do not use GrantTracker for this.

Page 17: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap Supplements (Issue Date on or after

12/23/2011)

Supplements awarded for a variety of purposes

Many may not involve payroll costs for above-cap personnel

Difficult for OSP to consistently determine whether supplement funds would benefit from a separate sub-budget to manage the new salary cap.

To avoid unnecessary use of sub-budgets where no above-cap payroll expenditures are involved Departments should determine whether a sub-budget is appropriate, and

communicate with OSP and GCA as needed.

Generally be limited to instances when the supplement

Is associated with a budget subject to the EL I salary cap

Supplement subject to EL II salary cap

PI/department intends to use supplemental funds to pay individual exceeding the EL II salary cap.

Page 18: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapSupplements (cont’d)

PI/Department Determine if sub-budget is needed.

If needed notify OSP prior to FA is being processed. Specify that sub-budget is subject to EL II salary cap in communications with OSP.

If it is determined a sub-budget is needed after the FA has been processed complete a TRANSPASU Form and submit it to GCA. Specify to GCA that sub-budget is subject to EL II salary cap.

Page 19: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapSupplements (cont’d)

 OSP If department indicates sub-budget needed to address salary

issues, note in Comments section at time FA is being processed for the supplemental funding and include “Subject to EL II salary cap” in the Comments Section of the FA. 

If the department does not request sub-budget, the supplement should be treated in the usual manner.

GCA Set up sub-budget if FA indicates it is required.

Set up sub-budget if department submits TRANSPASU Form.

 MAA - Populate Grant Flag 08 with the value of ‘2’ in the same manner as described above.

Page 20: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap Carry Forwards

If a carry forward of unobligated balances from a budget period subject to EL I into a budget period subject to EL II, and the department intends to use those funds to pay an individual whose salary exceeds the EL II salary cap, then A sub-budget for the carryover funds must be established If department does not notify GCA for need for a sub-budget, GCA will

carry forward funds into new budget and all funds will be subject to the EL II cap.

To avoid unnecessary use of sub-budgets GCA will NOT automatically set up sub-budgets. 

Departments responsible for determining if sub-budget is appropriate, i.e., when above salary cap payroll expenditures are anticipated to be funded with carry forward funds. 

When they are it is the department’s responsibility to communicate that to OSP and/or GCA and a sub-budget will be setup.

Page 21: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapCarry Forwards (cont’d)

PI/Department Submit request to OSP if sponsor approval is

required to carry forward funds.

When notified of approval contact OSP to advise sub-budget is needed at the time of the PAC setup to maintain EL I status for the carry forward funds.

If sponsor approval is not required and it is determined a sub-budget is needed, i.e., intent to use funds to pay an individual whose salary exceeds EL II, complete a TRANSPASU Form and submit it to GCA. Specify to GCA that sub-budget is subject to EL I salary cap.

Page 22: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary CapCarry Forwards (cont’d)

OSP Request sponsor approval for carry forward. 

If carry forward approved, initiate PAC and note on the PAC “subject to EL I salary cap”.

 GCA Receive PAC from OSP and set up sub-budget, or

Receive TRANSPASU Form from department and set up sub-budget.

Assign Grant Flag 08 a value of ‘1’

MAA Populate Grant Flag 08 with the value of ‘2’ through monthly batch process

Page 23: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap Multi-year Awards

Multi-year awards If the initial issue date is prior to December 23, 2011,

then Executive Level I cap is applicable to all years of the multi-year award.

If the initial issue date is on or after December 23rd, then Executive Level II salary cap will apply to all years of the multi-year award.

Page 24: ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PI/DEPARTMENT; OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS (OSP); GRANT & CONTRACT ACCOUNTING (GCA); MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING & ANALYSIS (MAA)

Implementation of New DHHS Salary Cap No Cost Extension

If there is a no cost extension The original award terms and conditions remain

unchanged for the period of extension Award subject to the EL I salary cap for the original grant

period will remain at EL I salary cap level for period of extension

No special action is required.

PI/Department No formal action required Recommended PI/Department verify Grant Flag 08 set at correct

value, i.e., set at the value of ‘1’ if the award was funded under EL I salary cap rules, or the value of ‘2’ if the award was funded under EL II salary cap rules.


Recommended