Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | layton-hurlbutt |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Rotation Curve of the Galaxy
Mareki Honma and Yoshiaki Sofue
The University of Tokyo,Received 1996 October 25; accepted 19971997 April 10
Journal review, 05/21(Fri.), 2010Journal review, 05/28(Fri.), 2010@Kagoshima University, M2:Nobuyuki, Sakai
Overview
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve-2-1.Data-2-2. Analysis-2-3.Effect of Warp-2-4. Fitting and Uncertainty Estimate
3. Overall Rotation Curve of the Galaxy 4. Discussion
i. Analyzing the HI data with two methods for exploring ofthe outer rotation curve.
ii. We present the overall rotation curve (from 0.3R0 to 2.5R0).
iii. This rotation curve shape depends on the galactic constants.
R0=8.5kpc, Θ0=220[km/s] 〃 , Θ0<200[km/s]
Abstract
Following describes details.
But,,
Rotation Curve
1. Introduction
i. Rotation Curve (e.g., Bosma 1981, Rubin et al. 1985)→One of the most powerful tools for studying dynamics
of galaxies!∵ RC can reveal mass distribution.
ii. Flat rotation in spiral galaxies →Indicating the existence of dark matter!
iii. As for the Milky Way Galaxy→Inner and outer rotation curves are derived by different
methods!
APOD より M83 (NGC5236)Sofue, et al. (1999)
RC
1. Introductioniii:Inner Rotation
Assumptions of axisymmetryaxisymmetry and circular orbit.circular orbit.
So, D, Vt, and Vr are described by below equations.
s]mvelocity[krotation
l)RR
Θ
R
Θ(=V
lR
DlR
R
Θ
R
Θ=V
r
t
/:Θ
sin
coscos
00
0
00
0
( Ⅱ現代の天文学:銀河 )
The radial velocity along a line of sight becomes maximum at the tangential point.
lRR sin0
There have been some observations (CO, HI, etc.) for Inner Rotation.
lRRlRD 220
20 sincos
1. Introductioniii:Outer Rotation
There is no tangential point.
Distance measuring (e.g., photmetric distance) is necessary.
HII regionsObservations
(photmetric distance).(e.g., Brand, Blitz (1993))
Planetary nebulaeobservations.
(e.g., Schneider, Terzian (1983))
but,,
There is large uncertainty.
∵ i)An error in the estimate of the distance.
1. Introductioniii:Another 2 methods for Outer Rotation
Petrovskaya, Terrikorpi (1986)Merriefield (1992)
Assumption:
Constant thickness(Z0) along each HI ring
D
Sun Z0
b
)sincos
arctan(
)arctan(
20
20
0
0
lRRlR
zD
zb
Δ
Observed Δb(l) can determine R/R0.
Assumption:
・ HI gas density is constant along a HI ring・ Optical depth at specific frequency
|)(|
)(),(
'
'
RRr
r
dr
dVRkN
lV
τ
k=N(R) : HI density=constant
:continued
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
2-1. Data
・ We reanalyzed the galactic HI survey data with two methods.
Reffer of HI data l range
[deg.]
b range
[deg.]
Angular
Resolution
Note
Weaver & Williams (1974)
10~350 |b|≦10 35’.5 Nothern
hemisphere
Kerr et al., (1986) 〃 〃 48’ Sourthern
hemisphere
2-2. Analysis
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
Merriefield (1992) Petrovskaya, Terrikorpi (1986)
Considering:
HI density ∝ Tb
when optical depth is small.
4
4202 )(
i
ii
T
Tbbb
Σ
ΣΔ
b0: centroid= ∂Δb / ∂b0 =0
24ii TofinsteadT
Effect of diffuse gas is removed.
Considering:
I will use
for convenience of fitting.
)sin*/(1 22 lTbξ
Q1: What is the HI density?
(My) Answer 1: HI density is HI column density↓∵
2-2. Analysis
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
Merriefield (1992) Petrovskaya, Terrikorpi (1986)
Considering:
HI density ∝ Tb
when optical depth is small.
4
4202 )(
i
ii
T
Tbbb
Σ
ΣΔ
b0: centroid= ∂Δb / ∂b0 =0
24ii TofinsteadT
Effect of diffuse gas is removed.
Considering:
I will use
for convenience of fitting.
)sin*/(1 22 lTbξ
2-3. Effect of Warp
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
R/R0=1.68 R/R0=2.22
lRWl)RR
Θ
R
Θ(=Vr sin*)(sin0
0
0
b0
l [deg.]
Sin curve
i)Circular orbit.ii)Orbit plane is rotated
with respect to thegalactic plane around
the line of sight to the G.C.Two method can apply!Two method can apply!
Orbit plane
Galactic plane
Q2: What is the sin curve?
(My) Answer 2: There are same suggestions.But…
↓∵
2-3. Effect of Warp
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
R/R0=1.68 R/R0=2.22
lRWl)RR
Θ
R
Θ(=Vr sin*)(sin0
0
0
b0
l [deg.]
Sin curve
i)Circular orbit.ii)Orbit plane is rotated
with respect to thegalactic plane around
the line of sight to the G.C.Two method can apply!Two method can apply!
Orbit plane
Galactic plane
Circular orbit may be correct.
2-4. Fitting and Uncertainty Estimate
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
・ Both Δb and Tb were averaged between the northern part and the southern part of the disk , and averaged every 2.5°longitude interval.
Δb result (Merriefield, 1992)
Δb
l
R/R0=1.68(outer region) R/R0=0.85 (inner region)
flat
Observation
The difference between flat and observation indicates that R of observation is larger than that of flat.
If: Θ0=220km/s
The result is in agreement with the tangential method.
Θ=221km/s
2-4. Fitting and Uncertainty Estimate
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
・ Both Δb and Tb were averaged between the northern part and the southern part of the disk , and averaged every 2.5°longitude interval.
Tb result (Petrovskaya &Teerikorpi, 1986)
l
Sin^2 (l)
ξ
R/R0=1.14
There are large uncertainties.
R/R0=1.63
2-4. Fitting and Uncertainty Estimate
2. Derivation of Outer Rotation Curve
Results both (Merriefiled, 1992) and (Petrovskaya &Teerikorpi, 1986)
SummaryMerrifield’s method is better.
These results are consistent with
each other within
the errors.
3. Overall Rotation Curve of the Galaxy
・ We compare rotation curve obtained by Marrifield’s method with those obtained by various method.
Marriefield’s method:
Filled open circle
ORC Brand & Blitz 1993:
HII regions
Schneider & Terzian (1983)
Planetary nebulae
Merrifield’s method has the smallest error and
the largest coverage of the galacto-centric radius.
4. Discussion
Inner:
(Fich et al. 1989)
Outer:
Merriefield’s
method
Overall rotation curves of the Galaxy
R0=8.5kpc, Θ0=220[km/s] 〃 , Θ0<200[km/s]
Outer rotation depends strongly
on the galactic constants.
Something extraMy ORC research with VERA would result in
most precisely Outer Rotation Curve. (??) (laugh)
There are uncertainties in outer rotation even Merrifield’s.
Fin.