RUSA Capacity Building and Leadership Management...

Given that higher education plays a crucial role in the construction of a knowledgeable society, teaching, research

and related functions are fundamental to social and economic activities. Thus, higher education in India has

undergone a sea of changes and rapid expansion over the last six decades. This increase in the number of public

and private higher education institutions is in keeping with the stated objectives of improving access and equal

opportunities to a large and growing young population. The higher education sector, however, faces myriad

challenges as it tries to keep pace with an increasingly competitive and global higher education market. The

leadership capacity building and internationalized curricular reform initiatives proposed herein seek to help to

identify, address, and alleviate these challenges.

While it is true that higher education institutions are complex enterprises, in the case of India it is even more

challenging given the scale, size and complexities of the Country and its systems. Management of higher education

institutions requires deep understanding, knowledge, skills and experience in leading institutions. Broadly, the

management of institutions focuses on a range of issues that require focused, ongoing professional expertise

development. To build the capacities of existing higher education leaders and administrators and to draw fresh

talent into the management of higher education systems, TISS in 2016 administered training programs for Higher

Education (HE) leaders through a leadership academy, the HELA (Higher Education Leadership Academy) under

the component Leadership Management.

RUSA state bodies selected over 612 higher education leaders from 23 states and 4 UTs to attend HELA

workshops. The participants included: (1) vice chancellors (VCs), Pro-VCs, higher education policy makers,

senior higher education leaders and administrators such as State Higher Education Council Chairperson and

Principal Secretaries (2) deans, chairpersons and heads of departments, (3) college principals and vice-principals

(4) registrars, finance officers, controller of exams, Director of the Board of University and College Development

(5) officials from the State Higher Education Department, State Higher Education Council, State Project

Directorate, and Chancellor’s Office (6) members of university statutory bodies such as Academic Council,

Executive Council, Senate and Board of Studies.

There has been an overwhelmingly positive response from the participants both during and after the sessions in

which they participated. A comprehensive report with detailed information on the Higher Education Leadership

Forums has been appended.

Higher Education Leadership Academy Under Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan, Report 2016-17

Introduction:

Higher education in India has undergone sea changes and rapid expansion over the last six decades. This sector

has seen the rise of diverse set of institutions both in the public and the private space. Obviously, the increase in

the number of institutions is in keeping with the stated objectives of improving access and equal opportunities to

a large young population. Given that higher education plays a very important role towards the construction of

knowledge society, teaching, research and related functions are fundamental to social and economic activities.

In an increasingly competitive and global era higher education institutions are today facing enormous amount of

challenges.

While it is true that higher education institutions are in general complex enterprises, in case of India it is even

more challenging given its scale, size and complexities. The management of these higher education institutions

are quite extraordinary. This requires deep understanding, knowledge, skills and experience in leading and

managing institutions. Broadly, the management of institutions focuses on a range of issues where professional

expertise is desirable. To build capacities of existing higher education leaders and administrators and to draw

fresh talent into the management of higher education systems, it is proposed to administer training programs for

Higher Education (HE) leaders through a leadership academy, the HELA (Higher Education Leadership

Academy).

Leadership development program will be the major activity and focus of the HELA. However, we believe that

supplementing leadership development with activities such as research on topical issues in HE, research-based

policy advocacy and promotion of networking among HE leaders and actors can generate a more decisive and

holistic impact on the advancement of leadership of HE institutions, as well as on the quality and performance

of HE institutions and the overall advancement of HE in India. Therefore, in addition to offering leadership

RUSA Capacity Building and Leadership Management Report, 2016-2017

development program the HELA will also carry out activities such as research on HE, research-based advocacy

and promotion of networking among HE actors and leaders.

Objectives of the Leadership Forum:

Develop the capacity, in terms of governance and leadership abilities, of Higher Education (HE) leaders and

to develop excellent HE administrators and leaders

Carry out and disseminate research that can serve to inform and influence decision making in HE

institutions and policy making, planning and governance with respect to the field of HE

Formulate and advocate research based policy suggestions for the advancement of HE in India and to

contribute to the strengthening of macro level HE policy

Serve as a platform for sharing ideas and suggestions on improving HE in India and promote networking

and mutual learning among leaders and actors in the field of H.E.

The main goal of the leadership development activities of HELA would be to equip HE leaders and

administrators to competently and efficiently handle the complex problems and leadership challenges that arise

in the academic, financial and administrative aspects of the functioning of their respective institutions, so that

they can lead and manage institutions of higher learning in a more effective manner.

The specific objectives of the leadership development program would be to:

1. Adapt leadership and management practices to changing world of work.

2. Identify positive and negative examples of leadership and management practices

3. Address common leadership and management challenges.

4. Develop critical leadership competencies and skills for effective organizational efficiency.

5. Develop interpersonal competencies, improve organizational effectiveness and develop personal

characteristics for leaders and administrators.

6. To lead and support the diverse workforce, promote team work and create positive working

relationship throughout the institution, improve staff performance and efficiency, improve work

processes to enhance efficiency and effectiveness of the organization, use creativity and innovation to

meet current and future leadership challenges.

7. Develop critical thinking, judgment and problem solving abilities.

Methodology:

The Resource Persons (trainers) of the leadership training program will be leading academics, scholars,

academic administrators and leaders, and management experts both from India and abroad. These experts will

bring to the training strong knowledge base on conceptual issues and practitioners’ perspective.

The program will be delivered through an integrated teaching and learning method involving case studies, group

activities, field visits and online virtual sessions. The focus will not be only conceptual or theoretical but also

practical and participatory: participants of leadership development program will be required to apply the learnt

skills in simulated situations and identify actual leadership and management problems in their respective

institutions and come up with possible solutions to these problems, as part of the assignments in these programs.

The content to be delivered in the program would be informed and shaped by the cutting edge HE researches of

this HE leadership academy. The program durations offered will be 4 weeks, 2 weeks, one week and 2 days. In

future, immersion program and exposure visits will also form a part of the training and a Professional

Experience Plan, developed by the participant and his/her mentor, is to be carried out in their homes or

conveniently located campus.

Evaluation mechanisms will be built into the actual leadership development programs of HELA. At the end of

every program me, detailed questionnaires will be given to participants to obtain their feedback on the quality

and relevance of the content and delivery of the program. Such feedback, along with oral suggestions also

gleaned from participants during the program, will be used to refine and further develop the future content,

structure and delivery of the leadership development program.

Levels:

The leadership program provided will be customized according to 6 leadership levels/groups: (1) For Vice

Chancellors, Pro-VCs, HE policy makers, Senior HE leaders and administrators such as State Higher Education

Council Chairperson and Principal Secretary (2) For Deans, Chairpersons and Heads of Departments, (3)

College Principals and Vice-Principals (4) For Registrars, Finance Officers, Controller of Exams, Director of

Board of University and College Development (5) Officials from State Higher Education Department, State

Higher Education Council, State Project Directorate, Chancellor’s Office (6) Members of University Statutory

Bodies such as Academic Council, Executive Council, Senate and Board of Studies.

Activities Undertaken this year:

1. Total no of participants trained till date – 518

2. From what to what date - January 2016 - November 2016

3. No. of training forums organized - 8

4. No. of States and Union Territories: 23 States and 4 Union Territories

Name of the States – Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh,

Telangana, Haryana, Jammu & Kashmir, Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, Bihar, Uttarakhand, Goa, Gujarat, Sikkim,

Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, West Bengal, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Mizoram

Name of the Union Territories – Andaman Nicobar, Chandigarh, Dadra Nagar Haveli and Daman-Diu

5. Where were these forums organized - Mumbai, Raipur and Bangalore

1st Higher Education Leadership Forum:

Mumbai, Maharashtra, 8th and 9th January,2016

1. About the forum:

The first higher education leadership forum was held in Mumbai, Maharashtra, 8th and 9th January, 2016.

The forum was attended by 34 higher education department members; Vice Chancellors, Principals, Associate

Professors, Professors, Registrars, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the states of Maharashtra,

Andhra Pradesh and Odisha.

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure I

2. Resource Persons and Delivery:

The leadership content was delivered by the Speakers from the Graduate School of Education, University of

Pennsylvania, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, University of Mumbai, and the Tata Institute of Social

Sciences. The total contact hours with the faculty is more than 20 hours including other interaction as

discussions excluding the formal sessions.

The sessions were around Organizational Effectiveness & Performance Management-System Governance,

Strategic Planning and Needs Assessment: Preparing Institutional and State Higher Education Plans, Leading

Institutional Change & Developing a Method for Assessing Change and Impact, In Pursuit of Institutional

Excellence, Financing Higher Education, Organizational Health and Development: Motivation, Effective

Engagement and Team Building.

The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure II along with the names of the speakers.

3. Snapshots:

4.Quantitative Feedback of the participants:

4.a.i. Did the content of the training meet your expectations?

52% of the participants found the structure and organization of the course very well structured and 48% found it

well structured.

4.b. ii. Immediate usefulness of this training in your job

46% of the participants found training in immediate job very useful and 46% useful. A very small percentage

8% found the training of limited use.

4.c.iii.Future usefulness of this training on job

42% of the participants found training very useful for future jobs and 54% quite useful. A small percentage,

4% found this training of limited use.

4.d. iii. Practical orientation of the course

46%

46%

8%

Immediate usefulness of this training in your job

Very Useful

Quite useful

Of limited use

Not at alluseful

42%

54%

4% Future usefulness of this training on job

VeryusefulQuiteusefulOf limiteduseNot at alluseful

52%

48%

Did the content of the training meet your expectations

Very useful

Quite useful

Of limited use

15% of the participants found the course highly practical and a large percentage of the participants, 65%

found practically oriented. 19% practically oriented to a limited extent.

4.e.v. Benefits of interaction with fellow participants

37% of the participants found the interaction with fellow participants substantially benefitting and 59%

considerably benefitting. A small percentage 4% found it fairly benefitting.

5.a. Qualitative Learning/ Takeaways:

Understood purpose of RUSA more clearly.

Importance of documenting data

Importance of strategic planning & transparency.

Managing conflicts.

Important to include societal inputs in strategic planning.

Good governance and leadership - key to academic performance.

Development of micro-level sustainable strategies for achieving reforms.

Timely re-organization or reconfiguration of organizational logics is critical.

University leadership also learns to raise resources.

Not to forget that university is to train minds and not to create only employable youth.

Realized the difference between leadership and management.

Empower others when they resist.

Cultivate generosity of spirit.

Successful vision is the one that galvanizes everyone so that everyone moves in the same direction.

Leader needs to communicate, communicate and communicate.

We must have positive restlessness.

What is strategic planning of the educational institutions for promotion of higher education?

While preparing the strategic planning, the following points are to be considered. 1. Vision 2. Mission

3. Participatory methodology 4. Need based mechanism.

The higher education must give emphasis on academic excellence with priority on teaching, training

and research.

Implementation of effective leadership both in managerial governance system.

Ensuring autonomy and accountability on the part of the leader of the institution.

15%

66%

19%

Practical orientation of the course

Highly practicaloriented

Practically orientedto a great extent

Practically orientedto a limited extent

Not all practicallyoriented

37%

59%

4%

Benefits of interaction with fellow participants

Substantially

Considerably

fairly

Not at all

The relevance of data for policy design and intervention.

Engaging with the Government persistently helps.

Oversight (spot), foresight (solve), insight (frame)

Facilitate the development of research ideas among students & build a peer-reviewed network.

Develop a sense of belongingness.

Decentralize the power.

Trust the front-line worker. Identify the special traits of the employees and sensitize them for the

benefit of the institution.

Encouraging collaborative research in International industries/universities

Introducing new courses relevant to societal needs or areas where natural resources are available.

Improve teaching and learning

Research and development

Inclusion centers

Centers of excellence

Alumni contributions

Attracting foreign national students in UG/ PG course

2nd Higher Education Leadership Forum:

Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th January, 2016

1. About the forum

The third higher education leadership forum was held in 11th and 12th January in Mumbai, the forum was

attended by 33 higher education department members; Vice Chancellors, Principals, Associate Professors,

Professors, Registrars, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the states of Maharashtra, Andhra

Pradesh and Odisha.

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure III.










Engagement and Team Building. The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure IV along with

the names of the speakers.

3. Snapshot:

4. Quantitative Feedback:

4.a.i. Did the content of the training meet your expectations?

36% of the participants found the structure and organization of the course very useful and 52% found it quite

useful. 12% found it of limited use.

4.b. ii. Immediate usefulness of this training in your job

40% found this training useful in their immediate job and 56% quite useful. 4% finds this training useful in their

immediate job.

4.c.iii.Future usefulness of the training on job

42% found this training useful for future jobs and 54% found this quite useful. 4% found this of limited use.

4.d.iiii.Practical orientation of the course

36%

52%

12%

Did the content of the training meet your …

Very useful

40%

56%

4%

Immediate usefulness of this training in your job

Very Useful

Quite useful

Of limited use

Not at all useful

42%

54%

4%

Future usefulness of the training on job

Very useful

Quite useful

Of limited use

Not at all useful

64% of the participants found this training practically oriented to a great extent. 12% of the participants found it

highly practically oriented and 24% of them found it to be practically oriented to a limited extend.

4.e.v. Benefits of interaction with fellow participants

60% of the participants considerably benefitted from the interaction with fellow participants during this course

and 24% found this substantially interactive. 16% of them found this good.

5.a. Qualitative Feedback:

Takeaways/Implementation points

1. Need Assessment and planning

2. Documentation of data. Creation of factual data

3. Data collection for policy design and intervention.

4. MIS to be introduced in colleges

5. Make a research repository

6. To inculcate the idea of leadership. Myself being the role model of overall development of the

institution for benefit of all the stakeholders.

7. Redefine vision, mission and objectives of the institutions.

8. Making comprehensive institutional plan before submitting the same to reason

9. Participatory decision-making

10. Be a facilitator and help the administration in development of higher education

11. Formation of institutional development cell.

12. Encourage students in problem solving (institution).

13. University is a body of knowledge and creation and not a skill factory. The person would like to go and

try changing mindset of the people.

14. Creating research cells.

12%

64%

24%

Practical orientation of the course

Highly practicaloriented

Practicallyoriented to agreat extent

24%

60%

16%

Benefits of interaction with fellow participants

Substantially

Considerably

fairly

Not at all

15. Motivating my colleagues to work for improvement of educational environment.

16. Share the objectives and the workshop experience with the faculty, administration and students of the

universities and college. Achieve the goal with help of RUSA.

3rd Higher Education Leadership Forum:

Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 9th and 10th March, 2016

1. About the forum:

The third higher education leadership forum was held in 9th and 10th March in Raipur, Chhattisgarh in

collaboration with the state government. The forum was attended by 51 higher education department members;

Vice Chancellors, Principals, Associate Professors, Professors, Registrars, RUSA Coordinators and Project

Directors from the states of Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Telangana and Karnataka. The list of the

participants is given in the Annexure V.










Engagement and Team Building. The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure VI along with


3. Snapshot:

4.

Quantitative Feedback:

The participants gave an overwhelmingly positive feedback across all the indictors as shown in the table


4.a.i. Structure and Organization

74% structure and organization of the course found well satisfied and 19% found very extremely satisfied.

Remaining of 7% found somewhat satisfied.

4.b.ii. Immediate usefulness of training

56% of participants found training in immediately in job well satisfied useful and 32% of the participants found

extremely satisfied and Less number of 12% participants found somewhat satisfied.

4.c.iii. Usefulness of training for future jobs

19%

74%

7%

Structure and Organisation

Exremely Satisfied(%)

Well Satisfied (%)

Somewhat satisfied(%)

32%

56%

12%

Immediate usefulness of training


Well Satisfied (%)


39%

56%

5%

Usefulness of training for future jobs


Well Satisfied (%)


56% participants found this training like to be useful and well satisfied future jobs and 39% participants found

extremely satisfied. Remaining 5% found somewhat satisfied.

4.d. iii. Practical Orientation

63% of the participants found the course highly practical and well satisfied and 21% participants found

somewhat satisfied and remaining 16% practically oriented to an extremely satisfied.

4.e.v. Benefit from interaction with fellow participants

53% of the participants found the interaction with fellow participants substantially benefiting well satisfied and

40% considerably benefiting extremely satisfied. Less percentage 7% found it fairly benefiting that somewhat

satisfied.

4.f.vi. Reception and Transport

79% of participants found extremely satisfied with reception and transport. One can see only 21% people well

satisfied.

4.g.vii. Residential Accommodation

16%

63%

21%

Practical Orientation


Well Satisfied (%)

Somewhatsatisfied (%)

40%

53%

7%

Benefit from interaction with fellow participants


Well Satisfied (%)

79%

21%

Reception and Transport


Well Satisfied (%)

Residential and accommodation participants were 91% well satisfied remaining only 7% and 2% participants

were well satisfied and somewhat satisfied.

4.h. viii. Food Quality and Service

According to food quality and service participants were 89% extremely satisfied fully. Once can see 9%

extremely satisfied remaining only found 2% somewhat satisfied.

4.j. ix. Class Room Facilities

Above diagram shows that 89% participants extremely satisfied fully of class room facilities. 9% found well

satisfied remaining only 2% extremely satisfied.

4.k.x. Interaction with Faculty

70% participants found of interaction with the faculty satisfied fully. Considering the 28% participants found

satisfied remaining only 2 % satisfied to a somewhat satisfied.

91%

7% 2%

Residential Accommodation

ExremelySatisfied (%)

Well Satisfied (%)

Somewhatsatisfied (%)

89%

9% 2%

Food Quality and Service

ExremelySatisfied (%)

Well Satisfied(%)

89%

9% 2%

Class Room Facilities


Well Satisfied (%)

Very unsatisfied(%)

70%

28%

2%

Interaction with Faculty


Well Satisfied (%)


4.l. xi. Overall Impression of the course

69% participants found impression of the course very good well satisfied. One can see 21% participants found

extremely satisfied and considering 10% of the participants said somewhat satisfied.

Feedback on sessions:

4.b.i. Talk on Leadership - Dr. Jerry Jellig

55% of the participants found that well satisfied of talk on leadership and 26% of participants found extremely

satisfied and 17% participants found somewhat satisfied remaining 2% of the participants very unsatisfied.

4.c. ii. Organizational Effectiveness PMS - Dr. Peter Eckel

59% of the participants of organizational effectiveness PMS found well satisfied and 22% of the participants

found extremely satisfied remaining 19% of the participants somewhat satisfied.

4.c.iii. Strategic Planning and Needs Assessment- Dr. B. Venkatesh and Dr. Sharon Ravitch

21%

69%

10%

Overall Impression of the course


Well Satisfied (%)


26%

55%

17% 2%

Talk on Leadership/Dr. Jerry Jellig

Exremely Satisfied (%)

Well Satisfied (%)


22%

59%

19%

Organizational Effectiveness PMS/Dr. Peter Eckel


Well Satisfied (%)


68% of the participants found of strategic planning and need assessment well satisfied and 27% of the

participants extremely satisfied and 5% of participants somewhat satisfied.

4.d. iv. Institutional Change and Impact Assessment - Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh

60% of the participant found of institutional change and impact assessment well satisfied and 38% of

participants extremely satisfied remaining of 2% of the participants found unsatisfied.

4.f.v. Distinguished Scholar Lecture - Dr. Robert Zemsky

49%of the participants of Distinguished scholar lecture well satisfied and 30% of the participants extremely

satisfied and one can see 14% and 7% of the participants found somewhat satisfied and very unsatisfied.

4.g.vi. Pursuit of Institutional Excellence, Financing Higher Education - Professor M S Ananth and Dr

Robert Zemsky

27%

68%

5%

Strategic Planning and Needs Assesment/ B Venkatesh and Sharon


Well Satisfied (%)


38%

60%

2%

Institutional Change and Impact Assessment/ Sanjay Deshmukh


30%

49%

14%7%

Distinguished Scholar Lecture/ Dr. Robert Zemsky


Well Satisfied (%)


53% of the participants found of pursuit of institutional excellence, financing higher education well satisfied

remaining 47% of the participants well satisfied.

4.h.vii. Motivation, effective Engagement and Team Building - Dr. Gerard Jellig

45% of the participants found of motivation, effective engagement and team building well satisfied and 38% of

participants extremely satisfied and 17% of the participants somewhat satisfied.

4.j. viii. Action Plan and Way Forward - Dr. B. Venkatesh and Dr. Sharon Ravitch

56% of participants found of action plan and way forward well satisfied one can see 34% of the participants

found extremely satisfied and remaining 10% participants found somewhat satisfied.

5.Takeaways/ Implementation Points:

Qualitative Feedback:

5.a. Most helpful parts of the forum

· Leading institutional change & developing a method for assessing change and impact

· Interactive part

· Talk on leadership

· Institutional excellence

· Motivation & dedication to work given by Dr. S Parasuraman

· Administration part

Interaction part is very encouraging and we learnt the best practices of the other participating states

· Interaction sessions with international speakers were good.

· Talk of Indian Speakers Professor Ananth and Professor Sanjay Deshmukh were excellent. We learnt a lot

from them learning about their universities and innovative practices.

53%47%

Pursuit of Institutional Excellence, Financing Higher Education/ M S Ananth and Zemsky


Well Satisfied (%)

38%

45%

17%

Motivation, effective Engagement and Team Building/ Dr. Gerard Jellig


Well Satisfied (%)

34%

56%

10%

Action Plan and Way Forward


Well Satisfied (%)

Somewhat satisfied (%)

· Organizational Health and Development: Motivation, Effective Engagement and Team Building:

. Session by Dr. S.Parasuraman, Dr. Gerard Jellig, Dr. Sharon Ravitch, Dr. M.S Ananth

Interaction with fellow participants facilitated learn some of the best practices/solutions which will help

us in resolving issues

5.b. Least helpful

None

5.c. Course gave specific ideas about bringing improvements in your working situations when you get

back?

Team work

Equity, excellence & employability

Devotion & trust among each other

New researches for the benefitting the society

Motivation & cooperation with team

To meet present challenge

To work more with rural area of the state

Preparation of vision plan and start implementation of it

We should believe in our competence. We should do every activity by considering the student and the

institution at the center

This gave us a platform to know the best practices of other participating states

Need assessment

Data management

Team Building

Institutional Building

Decentralization of power among different level of administration

Institutional change and developing a method for assessing change & impact

Transparency & accountability in the administration and teaching

Every institute should have well defined goals.

Good communication with staff so that everybody can work on the same page

5.d. Comments/observations you wish to make about the course

· Speakers who have complete understanding of Indian context must be invited in future.

5.e. Topic for future forums

How to act in politically sensitive environment?

Minimize political interference

Financial management in educational institutions

A comparison of present Indian education system and American education system. (In what way, we

can make change in our system)

The course can be devised category wise - For universities (issues & challenges), under graduate,

Government colleges, undergraduate Government aided colleges

Games on Team building & Leadership

Process of IDP

Financial Implementation

Sustainable development of the institution

Budget process

How can we develop performance management systems & what tools we can use?

Advice on sustainable campus

Leadership on research projects

5.f. Feedback on speakers:

Dr. Gerard Jellig: Talk on Leadership

· The way in which Gerard Jellig delivered his ideas was very good.

· Transparency

· Take feedback individually

· Give a comparison with our country and how it can be improved

· Frequent in-house meetings to be conducted at least once in every year.

· It was very appropriate and gave us ideas to first select a challenge and then try to talk, frame and lead it.

Dr. Peter Eckel: Organizational Effectiveness & Performance Management-System Governance

· Leading the team

· Excellent and informative lecture by him

· Must give suggestion to improve our present system

· More Indian oriented

5.g. Dr. B. Venkatesh Kumar & Dr. Sharon Ravitch: Strategic Planning and Needs Assessment: Preparing

Institutional and State Higher Education Plans

· Indian universities case studies will be very helpful

· One policy maker from each state should have been the coordinator to discuss the problem of his/her state after

the lecture

5.h.Dr. Peter Eckel & Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh: Leading Institutional Change & Developing a Method for

Assessing Change and Impact

· Quite informative

5.j. Dr Robert Zemsky: Distinguished Scholar Lecture: An American Perspective on Purposeful Change.

· Some quantitative data from Indian universities will be more helpful in understanding the lecture

5.k. In Pursuit of Institutional Excellence, Financing Higher Education: Dr MS Ananth & Dr Robert

Zemsky:

· Learnt a lot to work as a leader

5.l. Organizational Health and Development: Motivation, Effective Engagement and Team Building: Dr

Gerard Jellig:

· Nice steps to build a good team in an institution

5.m. Action Plan and Way Forward: Dr B Venkatesh Kumar & Dr Sharon Ravitch:

· More time for interacting at concluding meeting

· Good sharing by the representative of each state

5.n. Common Feedback

1. A group photograph should be given

2. Certificate

4th Higher Education Leadership Forum:

Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th March,2016

About the forum

The third higher education leadership forum was held in 11th and 12th March in Mumbai, Maharashtra. The

forum was attended by 58 higher education department members; Vice Chancellors, Principals, Professors,

Registrars, Secretaries, Higher Education, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the states of Jammu

& Kashmir, Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Telangana, Daman and Karnataka.

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure VII.

Resource Persons and Delivery:









Engagement and Team Building. The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure VIII along with


Snapshots:


4.a.i. Structure and Organisation of the programme

67% structure and organization of the course found well satisfied and 27% found very extremely satisfied.

Remaining of 6% found somewhat satisfied.

4.b.ii. Immediate usefulness of training

46% of participants found in immediately usefulness of training extremely satisfied. 40

% well satisfied. Less number of 14% participants found the somewhat satisfied.

27%

67%

6%

Structure and Organisation

ExtremelySatisfied (%)

Well Satisfied (%)

Somehwatsatisfied (%)

46%

40%

14%

Immediate usefulness of training

Extremely Satisfied(%)

Well Satisfied (%)

Somehwat satisfied(%)

4.c.iii. Usefulness of training for future jobs

54% of participants found training in immediately in job quite well satisfied and 37% extremely satisfied. Less

number of 9% participants found the training of somewhat satisfied.

4.d.iv. Practical Orientation

54% of the participants found the course highly practical and 26% participants found practically oriented of well

satisfied and somewhat satisfied. Remaining 20% practically oriented to extremely satisfied.

5.e.v. Benefit from interaction with fellow participants

41% of the participants found the interaction with fellow participants well satisfied and benefiting and 39%

considerably extremely satisfied. Less percentage 20% found it somewhat satisfied.

4.f.vi. Reception and Transport

37%

54%

9%

Usefulness of training for future jobs


Well Satisfied (%)


20%

54%

26%

5. Practical Orientation


Well Satisfied (%)


39%

41%

20%

5. Benefit from interaction with fellow participants


Well Satisfied (%)

85% of participants found fully and extremely satisfied with reception and transport. One can see only 15%

people of well satisfied.


Residential and accommodation participants were 96% extremely satisfied remaining only 4% of the

participants well satisfied.

4.h.viii. Food Quality and Service

According to food quality and service participants were 92% extremely satisfied. Once can see 6% well satisfied

remaining only found 2% somewhat satisfied.

4.j.ix. Class Room Facilities

85%

15%



Well Satisfied (%)

96%

4%

Residential Accommodation


Well Satisfied (%)

92%

6%2%


Extremely Satisfied (%)

Well Satisfied (%)

Somehwat satisfied (%)

Above diagram shows that 77% participants extremely satisfied of class room facilities. 23% well found

satisfied.

4.k.x. Interaction with Faculty

64% participants found of interaction with the faculty extremely satisfied fully. Considering the 28%

participants found well satisfied and remaining only 8% somewhat satisfied.

4.l.xi. Overall Impression of the course

60% participants found impression of the course well satisfied. One can see 25% participants found extremely

satisfied considering 11% of the participants said somewhat satisfied and only 4%. Very unsatisfied.

SPEAKER'S SESSION's FEEDBACK

4.b.i. RUSA - Journey So far/Dr. B Venkatesh Kumar

77%

23%

Class Room Facilities


Well Satisfied (%)

64%

28%

8%

Interaction with Faculty


Well Satisfied (%)


25%

60%

11%4%

Overall Impression of the course


Well Satisfied (%)


Very unsatisfied (%)

66% of the participants found that well satisfied of talk on RUSA journey so far and 28% of participants found

extremely satisfied and 4% participants found somewhat satisfied remaining 2% of the participants very

unsatisfied.

4.c.ii. Organizational Effectiveness - Dr. Peter Meckel

58% of the participants of organizational effectiveness found well satisfied and 22% of the participants found

extremely satisfied remaining 16% and 4%of the participants somewhat satisfied and very unsatisfied.

4.d.iii. Strategic Planning and Needs Assessment - Dr. B Venkatesh and Dr. Sharon Ravitch

50% of the participants found of strategic planning and need assessment well satisfied and 39% of the

participants extremely satisfied and 9% and 2%of participants somewhat satisfied and very unsatisfied.

4.e.iv. Pursuit of Institutional Excellence and Financing Higher Education - Professor Ananth and

Professor Robert Zemsky

66%

28%

4%2%

RUSA - Journey So far/Dr. B Venkatesh Kumar

Extremely Satisfied(%)Well Satisfied (%)

Somehwat satisfied(%)Very unsatisfied (%)

22%

58%

16%4%

Organizational Effectiveness /Dr. Peter Eckel


Well Satisfied (%)

39%

50%

9% 2%

Strategic Planning and Needs Assesment- Dr. B Venkatesh and Dr. Sharon Ravicth


Well Satisfied (%)



56% of the participants found in pursuit of institutional excellence and financing higher education that

extremely satisfied 28% of participants well satisfied and 14% and 2% of the participants found somewhat

satisfied and very satisfied.

4.f.v. Talk on Leadership - Dr. Jerry Jellig

51% of the participants in talk on leadership well satisfied and 21% of participants somewhat satisfied and 19%

and 9% of participants extremely satisfied and very unsatisfied.

4.g.vi. Lessons for Change Leaders - Dr. Peter Eckel

56% of participants found in lessons for change leaders well satisfied and 25% of somewhat satisfied and 14%

and 5% of the participants extremely satisfied and very unsatisfied.

56%28%

14%2%

Pursuit of Institutional Excellence and Financing Higher Education - Professor Ananth and Professor Robert Zemsky


Well Satisfied (%)



19%

51%

21%

9%

Talk on Leadership/ Dr. Jerry Jellig


Well Satisfied (%)


14%

56%

25%

5%

Lessons for Change Leaders/ Dr. Peter Eckel


Well Satisfied (%)



4.h.vii. Participant's Feedback on Content Framework - Dr. B. Venkatesh and Dr. Sharon Ravitch

One can see 61% of the participants found in feedback on content framework well satisfied and 24% extremely

satisfied and 15% of the participants somewhat satisfied.

4.j.viii.Organizational Health and Development: Motivation, Effective Engagement and Team Building -

Dr. Jerry Jellig

56% of the participants found in organizational health and development: motivational, effective engagement and

team building well satisfied and 21% an 14% found in somewhat satisfied and extremely satisfied remaining 9%

very unsatisfied.

4.k.ix. Action Plan and Way Forward - Dr. B Venkatesh and Dr. Sharon Ravitch

24%

61%

15%

Participant's Feedback on Content Framework/ Venkatesh and Ravitch


Well Satisfied (%)


14%

56%

21%

9%

Organizational Health and Development: Motivation, Effective Engagement and Team Building/ Dr. Jerry

Jellig


Well Satisfied (%)



26%

50%

19%5%

Action Plan and Way Forward/ Dr. B Venkatesh and Sharon


Well Satisfied (%)



One can see 50% of the participants found in action plan and way forward well satisfied 26% and 19% of

participants extremely satisfied and somewhat satisfied remaining 5% of the participants very unsatisfied.

5.Qualitative Feedback:

Key Implementation areas:

5.a.Key Learnings:

Expectations and constraints of VCs and other academic leaders

the perceptions of the academic administrators and teachers of the govt. policymakers.

A need to have more interaction to remove areas of concern

By informing the VCs and college principals more often and specifically about govt. schemes, their

implementation and policy directions.

for preparing the plans, the tools and methodology to be adopted for need assessment, has been very

clearly elaborated during the workshop. this will help us to have a very credible and robust database for

preparing the future plans.

Building on effective teams to achieve the goals within a time frame and celebrating it. Learning can

help me to effectively lead my team in the RUSA directions

Strengthening the interpersonal relationship in a team.

Make projections to the state higher education council through participatory channels of the University

system

Content- framework understanding through discussions

Engage the academic and administration of the University for improving its academic health in terms

of quality education and job market

Information about the purpose and significance of RUSA

Need assessment procedures and more importantly about participatory validation

Learned something about American education system of education and universities

These above stated learning would certainly enable to give my inputs to the university administration to

take advantage of RUSA scheme.

Learning your team for efficiency based on lecture of Gerard Jelling

Working on the formula of cross subsidy by opening new courses with the help of already ongoing

financial viable course

How to face different challenges in state university based on the lecture of Dr. Sharon Ravitch

Planning at college level. Micro analysis of the requirements for academic development

Financial requirement and time management to complete the effective development

Change what is needed for effective utilization of RUSA funds facilities.

Realization of the need of adoption of new model act to enable better governance of executive council.

Development of appropriate system for assessment of accountable performance of academic, research

and extensive portfolios.

Refinements to prevailing interpersonal management approaches by choosing new approaches.

5th Capacity-Building Workshop for the State Higher Education Councils (SHEC)

Bangalore, Karnataka, 23rd and 24th March, 2016

About the workshop

The fifth higher education leadership workshop was held in 23rd and 24th March in Bangalore, Karnataka. The

workshop was attended by 39 higher education department members; Advisors, Vice Chancellors, Principals,

Directors, Secretaries, Nodal Officers Higher Education, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the 21

states of Assam, West Bengal, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Daman Diu, Puducherry, Tamilnadu, Uttarakhand,

Jharkhand, Nagaland, Himachal Pradesh, Goa, Odisha, Gujarat, Chandigarh, Telangana, Lucknow, New Delhi

(MHRD), Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan.

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure IX.

a) Develop the capacity, in terms of governance and leadership abilities, of Higher Education (HE) leaders and

to develop excellent HE administrators and leaders

b) Carry out and disseminate research that can serve to inform and influence decision making in HE institutions

and policy making, planning and governance with respect to the field of HE

c) Formulate and advocate research based policy suggestions for the advancement of India and to contribute to

the strengthening of macro level HE policy

d) Carry out performance assessment and evaluation of HE bodies and institutions

e) Promote data based decision making and policy making and performance management in the field of HE

f) Serve as a platform for sharing ideas and suggestions on improving HE in India and promote networking and

mutual learning among leaders and actors in the field of HE.

Resource Persons and Delivery:

Respective principals, Director of state among themselves shared their based experiences and view on higher

education regarding respective Institution.The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure X

along with the names of the speakers.

Snapshots:

5.

Qualitative Feedback

5.a. Key Implementation

1. Establishing an effective MIS in exercising SHEC functions.

2. To bring functional transparencies.

3. To develop a sense of competitiveness among institutions to ensure good overall growth.

4. To introduce state ranking of Higher Education institution and Academic Audit to develop a sense

of competition among the institution to ensure overall growth in higher education in the state.

5. To undertake reforms in – Governance, Academic, affiliation, examination of the state Higher

Education through the intervention of SHEC and the institutional IQAC.

6. To install Bio-metric attendance for teachings, non-teachings faculty and students to ensure quality

education in higher education institution and Best practices under RUSA.

7. Strong and effective MIS.

8. IQAC in all Higher Education Institutions of the State.

9. Reforms in Governance, Affiliation, Examination and Academic field on State

10. Higher & Technical Education Department and Instructional level.

11. Strengthening of MIS and ICT system for effective implementation of CBCS, examination and

evaluation system

12. Will start vocational courses level 5&6 and B.Voc in some colleges as per NSQF

13. Strengthening quality assurance mechanisms in higher education institutions Instead of targeting

any problem as a whole let us go to the micro level let there be an ecosystem which facilitate

meaning expansion of HEIs in private sector as the Government can alone not address the issues of

equity Scarcity of quality teachers is the biggest issue. Attracting and retaining talented young into

teaching profession is the biggest challenge may be we thought that offering better remuneration

shall solve the issue but despite the best remuneration we failed to attract the best. There is a need

to look into the issue and explore other dimensions.

14. Consultation of Universities and Colleges with RUSA state project directorate as a ‘regular

feature’. This will help create a joint stake or onus of these reforms with institutions and not let it

remain with government alone. The discussion can be on stock taking of recent developments (like

lessons from other states) and also explore university best practices on either RUSA components

like IT platform, CBCS, IQACs, academic audits or indigenous innovations. This can be achieved

either by 'weekly' consultations of all universities for a 6-8 months (that Karnataka was able to

achieve) or by a Sate RUSA Consultation seminar with all stakeholders.

15. Pune University already has an IT platform which can be up-scaled on lines of ICT experience by

Karnataka's GyanaSangama, to create a common platform to integrate most functions and

processes in higher education system in a university and colleges.

16. Setting up IQACs in all colleges in the state at a war footing and making all universities lead this

quality assurance processes in all their affiliating colleges.

5.b.Key Learnings

1. To know the best practices in different implementation areas.

2. Opportunity to interact with other SHEC members.

3. RUSA thrust areas.

4. The experience sharing has given an opportunity to interact with the members of SHEC of the

other states. The proactive of the various state higher education council and regular meeting of

SHEC and officials from the Higher Education has greatly motivated.

5. The role of ICT has been thoroughly discussed and the contribution towards the developments of

higher education in the states is immense.

6. Best practices under RUSA Scheme introduced by various SHEC for quality education in the

higher Education are commendable.

7. A very active SHEC with more meetings will be fruitful for the development of Higher Education

in the State 8. Now we know what are the best practices in RUSA and other field of Higher

education.

8. ICT have a great role in the development of Higher Education Institutions in the State.

9. Came to know as how preparatory grant can be utilised like ICT initiatives in Karnataka, student

coaching by Chandigarh & Gujrat etc.

10. Vocationalization of higher education.

11. Sharing of practices and problems with members of other states.

12. This forum has provided me with a wonderful opportunity to interact with persons holding

leadership positions in higher education system. Let us begin with creation of a shared Vision and

Mission as success is always synergy. We need to initiate a debate and discussion at all level

involving all stakeholders so that we would be able to arrive at consensus and put in a coordinated

effort to resolve issues Every one of us working in our own water tight compartment often

unaware of the wonderful solutions available with the our neighbour let us identify the best

practices and indulge ourselves in reinvention of wheel.

13. There is a need to bring all stakeholders including various Universities, Colleges and Government

functionaries on board to be able to take RUSA mission, vision and governance reforms down to

every student and teacher in HEIs.

14. This was demonstrated by many states like Mizoram (through sensitizing workshops) and

Karnataka (using ICT and meeting universities every week for 8 months initiated by the Add.

Chief Secretary).

15. It was interesting to learn best practices of many states like active SHECs (West Bengal),

incentive schemes for students and 94% accreditation (Goa) and use of ICT as a complete solution

(Karnataka) and creating a well drafted SHEC act after studying acts of other states (Jharkand)

and many such more practices. There is however a need to further understand the processes with

the states that enabled them to achieve these results.

16. There are some common challenges across states like - lack of faculty and filling up of teaching

and non-teaching positions; Pondicherry is a case in point where there is a high GER of 41% with

69 institutions for every lakh population but pass out rate of students and their employability is

very poor and low. To note, education is totally free in this UT from nursery to higher education.

It means that universities and colleges have to innovate their pedagogy, curriculums, facilities and

skill imparting to retain students and make them highly skilled and employable and not just

depend on GER as an outcome indicator.

6th Higher Education Leadership Forum: Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th April,2016

1. About the forum

The first higher education leadership forum was held in Maharashtra at Mumbai on 11th and 12th April,2016.


Professors, Professors, Registrars, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the states of Bihar, Uttara

hand, Sikkim, Gujarat, Dadra Nagar Haveli and Goa.

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure XI




Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Chief Academic Officer, American Honors, President-

Elect, Chatham University, Director, National Assessment and Accreditation Council, National Law School

Bangalore. The total contact hours with the faculty is more than 20 hours including other interaction as


The sessions were around Marketing and Fund raising in Higher Education, Diversity in Admissions and Higher

Education, Community Colleges and Vocationalization of Higher Education, Changes in the Global Market for

Higher Education, Governance, Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education in India, Report-In and Plan

Development, Strategic Planning and Needs Assessment: Preparing Institutional and State Higher Education

Plans, Leading Institutional Change & Developing a Method for Assessing Change and Impact, Motivation,

Effective Engagement and Team Building. The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure XII


Snapshots:

This is an overall quantitative feedback analysis of two-day higher leadership forum under the aegis

of Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) and State Project Directorate (SPD), Maharashtra.

Participating States: Bihar, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Gujarat, Dadra Nagar at Haveli, Goa)

Total number of States : 6

Number of Participants: 57

4.a. Over all Quantitative Feedback

This is an overall quantitative feedback analysis of two-day higher leadership forum under the aegis of

Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) and State Project Directorate (SPD), Maharashtra.

Participating States: Bihar, Uttarakhand, Sikkim, Gujarat, Dadra Nagar Haveli, Goa)

Total number of States : 6


Questions

4.a.i.What do you think the structure and organization of the course to meet the objectives

64.71% structure and organization of the course found well-structured and 31.37% found very well structured.

Remaining of 3.92% found somewhat unstructured.

4.b.ii.How useful will this training be to you immediately in your Job

60.78% of participants found training in immediately in job quite useful and 29.41 very useful in Job. Less

number of 9.80% participants found the training of limited use.

4.c.iii.How useful is this training likely to be for future jobs you may handle

60.78% participants found this training like to be useful for future jobs and 35.26% quite very well useful.

Remaining 3.92% found limited use.

4.d.iv.Practical orientation of the course

50.98% of the participants found the course highly practical and 31.37% participants found practically oriented.

Remaining 15.69% practically oriented to a limited extent.

4.e.v. How far have you been benefited from interaction with the fellow participants during this c

39.22% of the participants found the interaction with fellow participants substantially benefiting and 41.18%

considerably benefiting. Less percentage 19.61 found it fairly benefiting.

4.f.vi.What extent you are satisfied with the following


96.8% of participants found fully satisfied with reception and transport. One can see only 3.92% people satisfied

to a large extent.


Residential and accommodation participants were 98.04% satisfied fully remaining only 1.96% satisfied to a

large extent.

4.h.viii . Food quality and service

According to food quality and service participants were 90.20% satisfied fully. Once can see 7.84% satisfied to

a large extent remaining only found 1.96% satisfied to a limited extent.

4.j.xi.Class room facilities

Above diagram shows that 74.51% participants satisfied fully of class room facilities. 23.53% found satisfied to

a large extent remaining only 1.96% satisfied to a limited extent.

4.k.xii.Interaction with the faculty

68.63% participants found of interaction with the faculty satisfied fully. Considering the 27.45% participants

found satisfied to a large extent remaining only 3.92% satisfied to a limited extent.

4.l.xiii Impression of the course

50.98% participants found impression of the course very good. One can see 37.25% participants found

excellent considering 9.80% of the participants said 9.80%. Only 1.96% participants found fair remark.

4.m.xiv.Diversity in Admissions and Higher education

Above diagram shows that 49.02% participants found of diversity in admissions and higher education very

good, 27.45% of the participants found good and considering 21.57% participants said excellent.

4.n.xv.Marketing and Fundraising in Higher education

50.98% of the participants found marketing and fund raising in higher education very good, 33.33% participants

said excellent, 13.73% of the participants found good and remaining only 1.96 participants said fair.

4.o.xvi.Community colleges and vocationalization of higher education

Diagram indicate that 58.92% of the participants found in community colleges and vocationalization of higher

education very good, 19.61% of the participants found good and remaining 13.73% and 7.84% participants said

that excellent and fair.

4.p.xvii.Changes in the global market for higher education

Above diagram which shows that participants found 49.02% changes in the global market for higher education

very good,27.45% of the participants found excellent, 17.65% of the participants said good and 5.88% of the

participants found fair.

4.q.xviii.Strategic Planning & Needs Assessment: Preparing Institutional & State Higher Education

Plans

Above diagram indicates that 41.18% of the participants of strategic planning & need assessment preparing

institutional and state higher education is excellent,39.22% of participants found as very good and considering

to 15.69% and 3.92% of the participants found good and fair remark.

4.r.xix.Achieving Institutional Excellence

Diagram shows that 68.63% of the participants found achieving institutional excellence excellent, 17.65% of

participants found in very good, 11.76% and 1.96 of the participants said that good and fair.

4.s.xx.Governance, Autonomy & Accountability in Higher Education in India

72.55% of the participants found governance, autonomy & accountability in higher education in India excellent,

19.61% of the participants said that very good, remaining fair and good of the participants found same

percentage that are 1.96%.

4.t.xxi.Action plan and way forward report in & plan development

31.37% of the participants found action plan and way forward report in and plan development excellent,29.41%

of the participants said very good, 11.76% and 3.92% of the participants found good and fair.

4.v.xxii.Closing Remarks: Review & Next Steps

Diagram shows that 39.22% of the participants closing remarks of review and next steps excellent.29.41% of

the participant found very good, considering remaining of the participants 7.84% and 1.96% good and fair.

5.Qualitative Feedback:

5.a.Most helpful parts of the forum

Achieving the institutional excellent

Fundraising for higher education

Strategic planning and need assessment

Lectures by key speakers

Sharing of personal experiences

Motivational for role work, leadership scholarship, transparency

Diversity in admission in higher education

Presentation by Indian scholars

Changes in the global market for H.E. by Dr. David

Preparing institutions state higher education plans by Prof.B. Venkatesh Kumar

Achieving institutional excellence by Dr. M. S. Ananth

Governance Autonomy and accountability in Higher Education India by

Dr. N.R.Menon.

Case studies presented by VC of Mumbai university

5.b.Least helpful parts of the forum

All sessions were find helpful to some extent

Inaugural part or session

Strategic planning

Action plan and way forward

Community college and vocationalization of higher education

Needs assessment

Vocationalization

Presentation by foreign scholars

Theoretical part of management and learning

Community colleges & vocationalization of higher education

5.c.Course give specific ideas about improvement

Revamp admission process

Autonomy, governance & excellence

Need assessment towards bottom up approach

Partnership with institutions

Alumni should become part of this upload data of baseline, analyzing and improve plan of area

On time

Regular orientation and conference organized by government

Teaching learning in classroom

Research

Certificate course

Fundraising

5.d.Observation about course

Very well organized

All topics were covered

Organised more session and accreditation topics for future growth

Academic leadership categories wise Vice Chancellors, Registrars, finance counter

Bottom-top approach

5.e.Topics important future forums

Need based assessment questionnaire and methodology

Capacity building

Review of performance of regulatory policies of higher education

Need of having MIS in higher

Financial management and human resources management

Decentralization of power in institution

Role of state education councils

Success stories about academic leadership which could be innovative

Form new framework about academic and administrative audit at state level

5.f.Diversity in admissions and higher education

• Situation in India and USA is not much use. Regulatory mechanisms are different

• As per the reservation policy stated give diversity admissions

7. Community college and vocationalization of higher education

• Technological collaboration was well brought out

• Vocationalization and elaborate on sustainability

5.g.Changes in the global market for higher education

• Comparisons between India and China was important

5.h.Governance, Autonomy and Accountability in higher education in India and session or suggestions

• Extremely motivated sessions

• Inspiring

5.i.Action plan and way forward/Session and suggestion

• Organize such kind of workshop

5.j.Review and Next steps

• Session would be extent four or five days and some field visits also include

All participants should speak into session on particular topic or express their views


Mumbai, Maharashtra, 12th and 13th Nov,2016

1. About the forum

The seventh higher education leadership forum was held in Maharashtra at Mumbai on 12th and 13thNov,2016.


Professors, Professors, Registrars, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the states of Andaman Nicobar

Islands, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Punjab, West Bengal

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure II


and the Dr. S. Parasuraman, Director of Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New

Jersey, Chief Academic Officer, American Honors, President-Elect, Chatham University, Director, National

Assessment and Accreditation Council, National Law School Bangalore. The total contact hours with the faculty

is more than 20 hours including other interaction as discussions excluding the formal sessions. The sessions were

around Marketing and Fund raising in Higher Education, Diversity in Admissions and Higher


Higher Education, Governance,Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education in India, Report-In and Plan


Plans, Leading Institutional Change & Developing a Method for Assessing Change and Impact, Motivation,

Effective Engagement and Team Building. The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the annexure XII


Snapshots of engagement

Qualitative Feedback & take aways:

1.Quality Education to the students

2.Better empowerment of IQAC; Process and feedback system, MIS Implementation

3.Teacher student ratio 1:20; ICT enabled learning

4.Better facilities with quality teaching experiences and all Institutions to be NAAC graded; Functional Academic

audit, Importance of Needs Assessment Decision support system

5.Creating Ecosystems for excellence and role of boundary less knowledge an Service conditions of GT, CWT

clearly defined in the interests of institution Increase in number of sectional posts in subjects where there has been

explosion in the no of students

6.Independence of colleges to recruit directly an Student attendance, consult with student reps, share the inputs

with the teachers Come up with new approaches, interact with colleges to find out their practices, inter library

loans Management of college administration

7.Research oriented higher education and Systematic needs assessment and assessment of resources in the institute

8.Sustenance of excellence participation of stakeholders; participatory governance; collaboration of stakeholders

and local community in the development of institution

9.Preparation of five-year plan for the university and maintaining and implementing the plan on annual basis

assessment of needs with funds

10.Benchmarking of the academic institution

11.Managing change by adopting bottom up approach; developing a system of getting feedback from bottom up,

restructuring of PG and UG syllabus, keeping an eye on changing need participatory System of Governance, will

try to be patient with people and try to solve problems in a more participatory kind way Updating of recruitment

rules early

12.Monitoring and pursuing of pending cases for creation of posts through MHRD

13.Active steps in consultation with counsel. Application for vacation of stay/ status orders Social Network,

community and institutional mapping benchmarking as a tool for knowing performance able to know how to

resolve government challenges

14.An attempt will be made towards high quality student intake or an ambience to be treated to make them

converted into high quality. we should encourage all the faculty members to engage in quantity research work

involving all the students so that it may be reflected in teaching excellence

15.Field visits and excursion with field notes will be strengthened

16.Motivating people - community and managing the challenges in a positive way and approach in higher learning

institutions.

17.Strengthening the major components of an institution such as Dynamic change development of students.

Faculty improvements. Community linkages as a bond to ensure excellence in higher education.

18.Key focus would be searching and achieving excellence at all works particularly on teaching and research.

(Innovation at all levels.)

19.To follow the benchmarking approaches as discussed by Alan Ruby taking the institutional traits into

commiseration. But the approach will surely improve the quality leadership.

20.Techniques in changing culture of the institution following the shared values and beliefs finally techniques of

group discussion /work practiced here has enough importance in building an academic leader. This would help

me in giving strength and action for college growth. Promoting research atmosphere in my college

21.Upgrade the campus through people participation, upgrade the library with the funds received from the state.

integration of high technologies in the teaching mechanism

This is an overall quantitative feedback analysis of two-day higher leadership forum under

the aegis of Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) and State Project Directorate (SPD), Maharashtra.

Participating States: Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Punjab, West Bengal

Total number of States: 5


Over all Quantitative Feedback

This is an overall quantitative feedback analysis of two-day higher leadership forum under the aegis of Rashtriya

Uchchatar Shiksha Ahiyan (RUSA) and State Project Directorate (SPD), Maharashtra.

Participating States: Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Punjab, West Bengal

Total number of States:5

Number of Participants:27


Mumbai, Maharashtra, 15th and 16th Nov,2016

1. About the forum

The eighth higher education leadership forum was held in Maharashtra at Mumbai on 15th and 16th Nov,2016.


Professors, Professors, Registrars, RUSA Coordinators and Project Directors from the states of Mizoram,

Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Bihar , Tamilnadu

The list of the participants is given in the Annexure II

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Structure and Organisation of the Course

Immediate usefulness of the training

Useful in future


Benefit from the interaction

Satisfaction with receptiona and transport

Residential Accomodation


Class Room Facilities and Interaction with…

Overall Impression

Feedback

Fair (%) Good (%) Very Good (%) Excellent (%)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

RUSA and System Change: Setting the…

Strategic Planning & Needs Assessment:…

Developing Communities of Practice as a…

Creating Ecosystems for Academic…

Pursuing World Class Universities Prof.…

Managing Conflicts & Motivating People…

The Role of Effective Academic Leaders in…

Group Work Alan Ruby, Matt Hartley,…

Action Plan and Way Forward Dr. Sharon…

Feedback



The leadership content was delivered by the Speakers from the Dr. Sharon Ravitch,

Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Dr. M.S. Anant,Former Director,

(IIT, Madras) & Visiting Professor IIT, Mumbai Dr. Matt Hartley

Associate Dean & Professor Graduate School of Education, Dr. Vijay Khole Former Vice-Chancellor University

of Mumbai and Prof. Alan Ruby, Senior Fellow PennAHEAD. Higher Education Division

Graduate School of Education University of Pennsylvania and Dr. Abhay Pethe

Professor, Dr. Vibhooti Shukla and the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New

Jersey, Chief Academic Officer, American Honors, President-Elect, Chatham University, Director, National

Assessment and Accreditation Council, National Law School Bangalore. The total contact hours with the faculty

is more than 20 hours including other interaction as discussions excluding the formal sessions. The sessions

were around Marketing and Fund raising in Higher Education, Diversity in Admissions and Higher


Higher Education, Governance, Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education in India, Report-In and Plan


Plans, Leading Institutional Change & Developing a Method for Assessing Change and Impact,

Motivation, Effective Engagement and Team Building. The schedule of the sessions has been annexed in the

annexure XII along with the names of the speakers.

Snapshots of engagement

http://www.gse.upenn.edu/hed


Qualitative Feedback & takeaway:

1.Cultural Changes

2.Sharing values and beliefs and Communities of Practice

3.Improvement of the ecosystem Inputs received from green field sites to be included in uni plan

Accreditation, coordination between uni and its affiliates

4.The inputs received will be disseminated to other administration

5.Preparing an institutional plan and developing communities of practice Idea of realizing shared values and

beliefs Preparing an institutional vision

6.Action plan, preparation by participatory approach Will implement learnings in institution and good

hospitality

7.Experiences and observations of fellow participants will be useful in dealing with various activities

Value for ICT, understanding of academic leadership will be helpful in framing action plan

Role of sharing ideas and experiences with other institutional leaders

8. Importance of community involvement in the functioning of institutions and need based planning

Importance of data compilation and data analysis

9.Needs Assessment

10.Importance of delegating responsibilities

11.Organizing repairs workshop of computer hardware to the residents in the vicinity of the college

12.Teaching the residents about proper dieting and hygienic conditions of kitchen by hOME SCIENCE

13.Use of science in everyday life applied within the next semester and organizing repairs workshop of

computer hardware to the residents in the vicinity of the college

14.Audit system should be developed in institutions

15.Community participation should be developed.

16.Leadership quality

17.Needs Based strategy planning for development of institutions

18.Developing ecofriendly environment and creating ecosystem for academic excellence Still it disappears to

me that there is wide gap between what we say and what exist on the ground

19.Administrative and academic excellence achievement skills

20.Needs identification have been done but not necessarily on the basis of available resources. Further processes

will be done in a less ambitious manner to have any kind of productive outcome

21.Establishing relationships within institutions on a less formal and structured kind of authority system would

be help in getting better results.

22.Empowering the employees as well as staff and faculty an Strategic planning and need assessment

This is an overall quantitative feedback analysis of two-day higher leadership forum under

the aegis of Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) and State Project Directorate (SPD), Maharashtra.

Participating States: Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jharkhand, Bihar , Tamilnadu ,

Total number of States: 6


Over all Quantitative Feedback

This is an overall quantitative feedback analysis of two-day higher leadership forum under the aegis of Rashtriya

Uchchatar Shiksha Ahiyan (RUSA) and State Project Directorate (SPD), Maharashtra.

Participating States: Mizoram, Himachal Pradesh , Rajasthan, Jharkhand , Bihar , Tamilnadu

Total number of States:6

Number of Participants:42

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

RUSA and System Change: Setting the…

Strategic Planning & Needs Assessment:…

Enhancing the academic performance of…

Promoting academic innovation, faculty…

University Governance and innovative…

Pursuing World Class Universities : lessons…

Group Work

Developing communities of practice as a…

Creating ecosystems for academic excellence

Realizing shared values and beliefs: role of…

Action Plan and Way Forward Dr. Sharon…

Feedback


0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Structure and Organisation of the Course

Immediate usefulness of the training

Useful in future


Benefit from the interaction

Satisfaction with reception and transport

Residential Accomodation


Class Room Facilities and Interaction with…

Overall Impression

Feedback


Annexures:

Annexure I.

List of Participants -



Sl

no.

State Name Designation Institution

1 Odisha Prof. Swapna Mohapatra PG Deptt. of Physics Utkal University

2 Odisha Dr. Uma Charan Pati Lecturer in Economics G M University, Sambulpur,

Dy. Registrar

3 Odisha Sri Basanta Kumar Das Reader in Philosophy R. D.Women's University,

Bhubaneswar, (Deputy

Registrar)

4 Odisha Dr. Pallishree Patnaik Dept. of Odia, Govt.A. College,

Bhawanipatna

5 Odisha Dr. Phalguni Mohanandia Dept. of Sanskrit, Rajendra (A) College,

Bolangir

6 Odisha Dr.Niranjan Mishra Dept. of Statistics Co-ordinator - SQAC

7 Odisha Dr. LaxmiKanta Tripathy R.D.E. Berhampur

8 Odisha Dr. Panchanan Gouda Reader in Chemistry Khallikote College,

Berhampur

9 Odisha Prof. Jagannath Lenka Professor of Economics

& Director

College Development

Council, North Odisha

University

10 Odisha Dr. Mamata Panda Dy. Secretary-cum-

Administrative Officer

CHSE(O)

11 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. V. Durga Bhavani Vice-Chancellor Sri Padmavati Mahila

Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati

12 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. P. Vijayalakshmi Registrar Sri Padmavati Mahila

Visvavidyalayam, Tirupati

13 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. E N Dhanamjaya Rao Registrar Adikavi Nannaya

University,Rajahmundry

14 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. K. Ramakrishnaiah Dean CDC, S. V. University,

Tirupati

15 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. D.V.R. Sai Gopal Dept. of Virology S. V. University, Tirupati

16 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. V. Sankar Director Research &

Development

Jawaharlal Nehru

Technological University,

Anantpur

17 Andhra

Pradesh

V. Satyanarayana Director, Foreign Affairs

& Alumni Affairs

Jawaharlal Nehru


Anantpur

18 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. T. Srinivas Dean, Faculty of

Commerce, Mgmt. of

Law

Yogi Vamana University

19 Andhra

Pradesh

Dr. T. Siva Prathap Dept. of Earth Sciences Yogi Vamana University,

Kadappa

20 Andhra

Pradesh

Dr Bhima Prabhakar Rao Professor of Electronics

and Communication

Engg,Rector & Former

Vice Chancellor

J N T University

21 Andhra

Pradesh

Dr Ravindra vipparthy University Engineer Jawaharlal Nehru


Kakinada

22 Maharashtra Prof.B.A.Chopade Vice Chancellor Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar

Marathwada University,

Aurangabad.

23 Maharashtra Dr.Anil Patil Director University of Mumbai

24 Maharashtra Prof.Suhas Pednekar Principal Ruia College

25 Maharashtra Dr. A.M. Mahajan Registrar North Maharashtra

University

26 Maharashtra Dr.R. Y. Patil Director B.C.U.D, Solapur University

27 Maharashtra Prof. Vilas Gaikar ICT, Mumbai ICT

28 Maharashtra Dr.Selby Jose RUSA Directorate

29 Maharashtra Dr.Varsha Andhare RUSA Directorate

30 Maharashtra Dr. Sushil Choudhari RUSA Directorate

31 Maharashtra Dr. Varsha Kelkar University of Mumbai

32 Maharashtra Ms. Varsha Malwade University of Mumbai

33 Maharashtra Dr. Vibha Surana University of Mumbai

34 Maharashtra Ms. Sunita Magare University of Mumbai

Annexure II.

Schedule of Forum



Day 1: Friday, January 08, 2016

Time Topic Resource Persons

9:00 a.m to 9:15 a.m Registration

9:15 a.m to 9:30 a.m

9:30 a.m to 10:00 a.m

Setting the stage

Welcome Remarks

Prof. B.Venkatesh Kumar

Course Director

Tata Institute of Social Sciences

10:00 a.m to 11:30 a.m Strategic Planning & Needs

Assessment: Preparing Institutional

and State Higher Education Plan

Prof. B.Venkatesh Kumar,

Course Director


&

Prof. Sharon Ravitch,

Graduate School of Education,

University of Pennsylvania

11:30 a.m to 12:30 p.m Enhancing the Academic Performance

of Institutions: Innovation and

Excellence in Research and Teaching

Prof. Shailendra Mehta,

Visiting Prof. IIM (Ahmedabad)

& Auro University

&

Prof. Robert Zemsky,



12:30 p.m to 1:30 p.m Lunch Break

1:30 p.m to 3:00 p.m Managing Conflicts & Motivating

People



& Auro University

&




3:00 p.m to 3:15 p.m Tea Break

3:15 p.m to 4:30 p.m Delegation of Responsibilities:

Ensuring Autonomy with

Accountability

Prof. S Parasuraman


&

Prof. Shyam Sunder

Yale School of Management

7:00 p.m Networking and Dinner Googly Conference Hall, MCA

Day 2: Saturday, January 9, 2016


9:00 a.m to 10:00 a.m Organizational Effectiveness and

Performance Management-System

Governance

Prof. S Parasuraman


&

Prof. Peter Eckel,

Graduate School of Education


10:30 a.m to 10:45

a.m - Tea Break

10:45 a.m to 12:20 p.m In Pursuit of Institutional :

Excellence, Financing Higher

Education

Prof. M.S. Ananth,

Former Director,

(IIT, Madras) &

Visiting Professor IIT,

Mumbai

&




12:30 p.m to 1:30

p.m - Lunch Break

1:30 p.m. To 3.30 p.m. Open Forum – Action Plan and Way

Forward


Course Director,


&




Annexure III.

List of Participants -



Sl

no.


1 Odisha Prof.Bulu Mohrana Dept. of Computer

Science, RUSA Co-

ordinator

Sambalpur University

2 Odisha Prof. Bishnu Prasad Das Dept. of Bio-Technology F M University

3 Odisha Dr. Padan Kumar Jena Reader in Botany Ravenshaw University

4 Odisha Dr. Mihir Kumar Das Reader in Botany OIC PTC, Higher Education

Dept

5 Odisha Dr. Pranati Das Lecturer in English B J B (A) College,

Bhubaneswar

6 Odisha Dr. Rashmi Mishra Reader in Sociology NKCD, Bhubaneswar, State

Co-ordinator- AISHE

7 Odisha Dr. Kaibalya Behera Reader in Commerce Govt. (A) College, Korapur,

Admn. Bursar

8 Odisha Dr.Manas Ranjan Patra Dept. of Computer

Science

Berhampur University,

Berhampur, Ganjam

9 Odisha Dr. P. K. Tripathy Dy. Director Vocational Education, Govt.

of Odisha

10 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. V. Uma Coordinator NAAC,Sri Padmavati

Mahila Visvavidyalayam

11 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. K. Bharathi Director Distance Education Centre,

Sri Padmavati Mahila

Visvavidyalayam

12 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof.D.Suryachandra Rao Vice Chancellor (I/c) Krishna University

13 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. M Mutyalu Naidu Vice Chancellor Adikavi Nannaya

University

14 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. Avula Damodaran Vice Chancellor S.V. University

15 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. M. Devrajulu Registrar S.V. University

16 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. M. Chandraiah Rector Dr B.R. Ambedkar

University

17 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. V. Krishna Mohan Registrar Dr.B.R. Ambedkar

University

18 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. A.V. Dattatreya Rao OSD Acharya Nagarjuna

University

19 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. B.Amarnath Registrar Rayalaseema University

20 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. V. RangaSwamay Principal Krishnadeva University

21 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. C. N. Krishna Naik Principal Krishnadeva University

22 Maharashtra Dr.N.V.Kalyankar Vice Chancellor Gondwana University

23 Maharashtra Vandana Chakrabarti PRO Vice Chancellor SNDT Women's University

24 Maharashtra Dr.Madhura Kesarkar Director B.C.U.D SNDT Women's University

25 Maharashtra Dr. Shruti Tambe SavitribaiPhule Pune

University

26 Maharashtra Dr. Aditya Abhyankar SavitribaiPhule Pune

University

27 Maharashtra Dr. S G Gupta Director Govt Institute of Forensic

Science

28 Maharashtra Dr. D. K.Agarwal Director B.C.U.D RTM Nagpur

University

29 Maharashtra Dr. V. N.Shinde Registrar Shivaji University

30 Maharashtra Dr.Sanjay Jagtap RUSA Directorate

31 Maharashtra Prof.Devanand Shinde Vice Chancellor Shivaji University

32 Maharashtra Ms. Sujatha Natarajan University of Mumbai

33 Maharashtra Prof. Neeraj Hatekar Head, Dept. of

Economics

University of Mumbai

Annexure IV.

Schedule of Forum


Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th January, 2016

Day 1: Monday, January 11, 2016


9:00 a.m to 9:15 a.m. Registration

9:15 a.m to 9:30 a.m.

9:30 a.m to 10:00 a.m.

Setting the stage

Welcome Remarks


Course Director


10:00 a.m to 11:30 a.m Strategic Planning & Needs

Assessment: Preparing

Institutional and State Higher

Education Plan


Course Director,


&




11:30 a.m to 12:30 p.m. Enhancing the Academic

Performance of Institutions:

Innovation and Excellence

in Research and Teaching



& Auro University

&




12:30 p.m to 1:30 p.m - Lunch Break

1:30 p.m to 3:00 p.m Managing Conflicts & Motivating

People



& Auro University

&

Prof. Sharon Ravtich,



3:00 p.m to 3:15 p.m Tea Break

3:15 p.m to 4:30 p.m Delegation of Responsibilities :

Ensuring Autonomy with

Accountability

Prof. S Parasuraman


&

Prof. Shyam Sunder

Yale School of Management

7:00 p.m Networking and Dinner Googly Conference Hall, MCA

Day 2: Tuesday, January 12, 2016


9:00 a.m to 10:30 a.m Organizational Effectiveness and


Governance

Prof. Madhava Menon,

National Law School

&

Prof. Peter Eckel,



10:30 a.m to 10:45 a.m Tea Break

10:45 a.m to 12:30 p.m In Pursuit of Institutional:

Excellence, Financing Higher

Education

Prof. M.S. Ananth,

Former Director,

(IIT, Madras ) &


Mumbai

&




12:30 p.m to 1:30 p.m. Lunch Break

1:30 p.m. to 3.00 p.m. Open Forum – Action Plan and

Way Forward


Course Director


&




3.00 p.m. to 3.30 p.m. Closing address

Annexure V

List of Participants

3rd Higher Education Leadership Forum


S.No State Name Designation Institution

1 Chattisgarh Dr. N.P Dixit Vice Chancellor Durg University

2 Chattisgarh Dr. Aruna Palta Principal Dr. R.B. Girls College

3 Chattisgarh Dr. A.K Pati Prof. HoD Bio Science Pt. R.S. Uni Raipur

4 Chattisgarh Dr. Prashant Shrivastava Asst. Prof. Govt. VYT PG College

5 Chattisgarh Dr. D.K Shrivatsava Asst. Prof. Govt. VYT PG College

6 Chattisgarh Dr. Sumona Bhattacharya Bilaspur University

7 Chattisgarh Dr. P.C Choubey Joint Director, SLQAC, C.G, Raipur

8 Chattisgarh Dr D.N Sharma Educational Consultant Bhilai, Durg

9 Chattisgarh Dr. Vikash Panchakshri Durg University

10 Chattisgarh Dr. Rijwanullah Professor Govt. PG College,

Ambikapur

11 Chattisgarh Dr. Anjali Ouadhiya Assistant Professor Govt. VYT PG College,

Durg

12 Karnataka Dr. S A Kori Executive Director Karnataka State Higher

Education Council

13 Karnataka Prof Basavaraju C Registrar University of

Mysore, Mysore

University of Mysore

14 Karnataka Dr Mahadevappa Gadge Prof and Head PDA (Autonomous)

College of Engineering

15 Karnataka Prof Ramesh L S Special Officer Karnataka State Higher

Education Council

16 Madhya Pradesh Prof Anjana Sharma Professor Rani Durgavati

Vishwavidhyalaya,

Jabalpur

17 Madhya Pradesh Dr H.R Shrivastava Additional Director

Higher Education

Office of the Regional

Additional Director,

Higher Education,

Gwalior

18 Madhya Pradesh Dr. Rajendra Jugade OSD Office of the Regional


Higher Education, Bhopal

19 Madhya Pradesh Dr. H.V Khandkar Principal Govt. Model Science

College, Gwalior

20 Madhya Pradesh Dr. H.L Anijwal Principal Govt. P.G College,

Jhabua

21 Madhya Pradesh Dr. Chandra Ratnakar Principal Govt Girls P.G College

Sagar

22 Madhya Pradesh Dr. K.P Sahu OSD State Project Directortate

RUSA

23 Madhya Pradesh Shri. S.K Saxena Finance Controller State Project Directortate

RUSA

24 Madhya Pradesh Dr. Anil Pathak OSD Dept of Higher Education

Govt. of M.P

25 Madhya Pradesh Prof. Abhay kumar Prof & HOD Department

of electronics

Devi Ahilya

Vishvidhyalaya, Indore

26 Madhya Pradesh Dr. Bhawana Ramaiya Assistant Professor Sagar University

27 Madhya Pradesh Prof. M.S Parihar Ex dean, Prof and HOD

department of Life

Sciences

Vikram Vishvidhyalaya,

Ujjain

28 Madhya Pradesh Prof R.S Verma Additional Director

Higher Education

Office of Regional


Higher Education, Indore

29 Madhya Pradesh Dr. Smt. Usha Shrivastava Additinal Director Higher

Education

Office of Regional


Higher Education, Ujjain

30 Madhya Pradesh Dr. S.K Saxena Principal Pt. S.N Shukla Govt P.G

College Shahdol

31 Madhya Pradesh Dr. Chaya Wagholikar Principal Govt. College, Depalpur,

Indore

32 Madhya Pradesh Dr.K N Chaturvedi Principal Holkar Science College,

Indore

33 Madhya Pradesh Dr. S.K Vijay Dy. Project Director State Project Directortate

RUSA

34 Madhya Pradesh Prof. Amiy Pahare OSD State Project Directortate

RUSA

35 Madhya Pradesh Sanjay Jain OSD

36 Telangana Prof. Ravindra Nath UGC Development

Officer

Osmania University

37 Telangana Prof M.Yadagiri RUSA Coordinator Telangana University

38 Telangana Prof. T.Bharat Controller of

Examinations

Satavahana University

39 Telangana Dr. N.Vijaya Bhaskar Principal Govt. Model Science

College Gwalior

40 Telangana Prof. S.Girisham, UGC

Coordinator

UGC Coordinator Karnataka State Higher

Education Council

41 Telangana Dr Prashanti Coordinator, RUSA MGU, Nalgonda

42 Telangana K.Srinivas Project Officer SPD, RUSA

43 Telangana Dr. N. Yadaiah Registrar/Research

Officer, TSG, RUSA

JNTU, Hyderabad/SPD,

RUSA

44 Haryana Ranjit Singh Vice Chancellor Chaudhary Ranbir Singh

University

45 Haryana Asha Kadyan Vice Chancellor Bhagat Phool Singh

Mahila Vishwavidyalaya

46 Haryana Dinesh Kumar Vice Chancellor YMCA University

47 Haryana Prof. Bhagwan Singh

Chowdhury

Registrar Chaudhary BansiLal

University

48 Haryana Jyoti Juneja Principal GVM Girls College

49 Haryana Jagdish Gupta Principal Arya College

50 Haryana Gianinder Singh Principal Government College

51 Haryana Chani Raj RUSA Coordinator MHRD-TISS

Annexure VI

Schedule of Forum

3rd Higher Education Leadership Forum


Day 1: Wednesday, March 9, 2016

Time Topic Expert Presenters

09:00 to 09:15 a.m. Registration

09:15 to 09:30 a.m.

Framing the Event, Setting the Context

Dr. B.Venkatesh Kumar,

Course Director, Chair, Higher

Education Leadership Academy,


09:30 to 10:15 a.m

Talk on Leadership Dr. Gerard Jellig, Graduate School of

Education,

University of Pennsylvania &

Superintendent, South Brunswick

School District, USA

10.15 to 10.30 a.m. Tea Break

10.30 to 11:30 a.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Organizational Effectiveness &


Governance

Dr. Peter Eckel,



11:30 to 01.00p.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Strategic Planning and Needs

Assessment: Preparing Institutional and

State Higher Education Plans

Dr. B. Venkatesh Kumar,




Dr. Sharon Ravitch,



01:00 to 2:00 p.m. - Working Lunch

02:00 to 04:00p.m. Leading Institutional Change &

Developing a Method for Assessing

Change and Impact

Dr. Peter Eckel,



Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh

Vice Chancellor


4:00 to 4:30 p.m Higher Education in Chattisgarh Shri Prem Prakash Pandey Minister of

Higher & Technical Education

Govt of Chattisgarh

Dr. B.L Agarwal

Principal Secretary

Higher Education

Govt of Chattisgarh

4:00 to 4:30 p.m. Tea Break

04:30 to 05.30 p.m. Distinguished Scholar Lecture

An American Perspective on

Purposeful Change.

Dr. Robert Zemsky,



07.30-9:30 p.m. Dinner

Day 2: Thursday, March 10, 2016


9:30 to 10.30 a.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

In Pursuit of Institutional Excellence,

Financing Higher Education

Dr. M.S. Ananth,

Former Director,

(IIT, Madras) &


Mumbai

Dr. Robert Zemsky,



10:30 to 10:40 a.m. Tea Break

10:40 to 11:15 p.m. Key note address: Higher Education Mr. Vivek Dhand, Chief Secretary,

Govt of Chattisgarh

11:15 to 12:15 p.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Organizational Health and

Development: Motivation, Effective

Engagement and Team Building

Dr. Gerard Jellig, Graduate School of

Education,


Superintendent, South Brunswick

School District, USA

Dr. S. Parasuraman, Director


12:15 to 1:00 p.m. Lunch Break

1:00 to 3.00 p.m. Working Session – Action Plan and

Way Forward

(Small-group facilitation by speakers)

Report-In and Plan Development





Dr. Sharon Ravitch,



03.00 p.m. to 3.15 p.m. Closing Remarks:

Review and Next Steps

Open Forum with Experts as Panel

Annexure: VII


4th Higher Education Leadership Forum

Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th March, 2016

S.N. State Name Designation Institution

1 Jammu &

Kashmir

Ms. Sarita Chauhan IAS Commissioner/

Secretary to Govt

Higher Education, J& K

2 Jammu &

Kashmir

Mr. Tariq Zargar State Project Director RUSA, J&K

3 Jammu &

Kashmir

Prof Rajni Kant Chief Coordinator,

Offsite campuses

University of Jammu

4 Jammu &

Kashmir

Prof Ashraf Wani Dean Academic

Affairs

University of Kashmir

5 Jammu &

Kashmir

Dr Khurshid Butt Dean Commerce

(Finance Incharge)

University of Kashmir

6 Jammu &

Kashmir

Dr. Jatinder Khajuria Joint Registrar

(Finance)

University of Jammu

7 Jammu &

Kashmir

Prof. Yaseen Ahmad shah Principal S.P College, Srinagar

8 Jammu &

Kashmir

Dr. Asha Gupta Principal Govt, Degree College, Khour

9 Jammu &

Kashmir

Prof S.S Bhalwal Principal Govt, Degree College, Udhampur

10 Jammu &

Kashmir

Dr. Yashmeen Ashai Principal Govt Degree College, Bemina,

Srinagar

11 Telangana Prof. K.Venkatachalam Vice Chairman TSCHE

12 Telangana Prof. I.Pandu Rangareddy Registrar Palamur University

13 Telangana Prof. T.L.N.Swamy Principal Nizam College (A), University

Constituent College,Osmania

University

14 Telangana Prof. R.Limbadri Registrar Telangana University

15 Telangana Prof. Komal Reddy Registrar Satavahana University

16 Telangana Dr. P. Bala Bhaskar Principal Govt., Degree Colleges

17 Telangana Khaja Altaf Hussein Registrar Kakatiya University

18 Telangana Prof Umesh Registrar MGU, Nalgonda

19 Telangana Dr. Manzoor Hussain Principal JNTUH College of Engineering,

Hyderabad

20 Telangana Prof. S. Limba Goud Research Officer, TSG,

RUSA

SPD, RUSA

21 Dr. M.Manzoor Hussain principal JNTUH College of Engineering

Sultanpur, Medak Dist.

22 Telangana Prof. A. Narsing Rao Professor and

Principal

University College of Science,

Osmania University

23 Karnataka Dr. D L Maheshwar Vice Chancellor University of Horticultural

Sciences

24 Karnataka Dr B Kaliwal Vice Chancellor Davanagere University

25 Karnataka Dr S B Hosamani Vice Chancellor Rani Chennamma University

26 Karnataka Dr Bhagyavana S

Mudigoudra

E-Governencae

Convener & State

Nodal Officer

Department of Higher Education,

Govt. of Karnataka

27 Karnataka Prof Chikkamada Naik Principal Govt. College

28 Uttar

Pradesh

Jitendra Kumar Principal Secretary Department of Higher Education

29 Uttar

Pradesh

Peeush Ranjan Agarwal Vice Chancellor V.B.S. Purvanchal University

30 Uttar

Pradesh

Sindhiram. K Dy. Registrar Bundelkhand University

31 Uttar

Pradesh

Professor M. Muzammil Vice-Chancellor Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University

32 Uttar

Pradesh

Professor G.C.R. Jaiswal Vice-Chancellor Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya Awadh

33 Uttar

Pradesh

Dr. R.P. Singh Director Higher Education

31 Uttar

Pradesh

Dr. Alok Kumar Srivastava Deputy Director RUSA, U.P.

32 Uttar

Pradesh

Dr. R.P.S. Yadav Additional Secretary,

U.P.

S.H.E.C

33 Uttar

Pradesh

Byas Narayan Singh Registrar Bundelkhand University

34 Uttar

Pradesh

S. Viqar Hussain Registrar C.S.J.M. University

35 Uttar

Pradesh

Smt. Sandhaya Mohan Finance Officer C.S.J.M. University

36 Uttar

Pradesh

M.K. Singh Finance Officer V.B.S. Purvanchal University

37 Haryana S.K. Gakkar Vice Chancellor Chaudhary Bansilal University

Haryana R Dahiya Vice Chancellor

40 Haryana Tankeshwar Kumar Vice Chancellor Guru Jambheshwar University of

Science & Technology

41 Haryana Ashwani Sabharwal Vice Chancellor State University of Visual and

Performing Arts,

43 Haryana Sushma Arya Principal DAV College for Girls

47 Kerela Dr. N. Veeramanikandan Pro-Vice chancellor University of Kerela

48 Kerela Vice Chancellor University of Calicut

49 Kerela Vice Chancellor University of Sankrit

50 Kerela Dr. Subash Peter Dean, Dept. of Bio

Sciences

University of Kerela

51 Kerela Mr. Finny Zacahariah Additional Secretary Department of Higher Education

52 Kerela Ms. Leena Litty Under Secretary Department of Higher Education

53 Kerela Prof S. Varghese Project Coordinator RUSA

54 Kerela Dr. K.V Saban Principal St. Alosious College, Edathuva,

Thiruvalla

55 Kerela Dr. Liyaqath Ali HOD Maharajas College, Ernakulam

57 Daman Dr. Balvant Singh Assistant Professor Dept. of Chemistry, Government

College

58 Daman Mr. Amit Naik Assistant Professor Dept. of Chemistry, Government

College

Annexure VIII

Schedule of Forum


Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th March, 2016

Day 1: Friday, March 11, 2016



09:10 to 09:20 a.m.



Course Director, Chair, Higher Education

Leadership Academy,


9.20 to 10.20 a.m. Keynote Address: Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh

Vice Chancellor


10:20 to 12:00 a.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Organizational Effectiveness and


Governance

Dr. S. Parasuraman, Director


Dr. Peter Eckel,



12:00 to 01.30p.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Strategic Planning and Needs


and State Higher Education Plan



Leadership Academy,

Tata Institute of Social Science

Dr. Sharon Ravitch,

Graduate School of Education, University

of Pennsylvania


02:30 to 03:45p.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

In Pursuit of Institutional Excellence,

Financing Higher Education

Dr. M.S. Ananth,

Former Director,

(IIT, Madras) &

Visiting Professor IIT, Mumbai

Dr. Robert Zemsky,


of Pennsylvania

03:45 to 05:00 p.m Talk on Leadership Dr. Gerard Jellig, Graduate School of

Education,


Superintendent, South Brunswick School

District, USA

05:15 to 05:30 p.m - Tea Break

07:00 to 07:30 p.m. Distinguished Scholar Lecture:

Need title

Dr. Peter Eckel,



7:30 onwards Networking and Dinner

Day 2: Saturday, March 12, 2016


9:30 to 10.45 a.m. Participants’ feedback on Content

Framework



Leadership Academy,


Dr. Sharon Ravitch,


of Pennsylvania

Dr. Peter Eckel



10:45 to 11:00 a.m. - Tea Break


Organizational Health and

Development: Motivation, Effective

Engagement and Team Building

Dr. Gerard Jellig, Graduate School of

Education,


Superintendent, South Brunswick School

District, USA

12:30 to 1:30 p.m. - Lunch Break

1:30 to 3.30 p.m. Working Session – Action Plan and

Way Forward





Leadership Academy,


Dr. Sharon Ravitch,


of Pennsylvania

03.30 to 04.00 p.m. Closing Remarks:


Open Forum with Experts as Panel

Annexure IX




SN State Name Designation

1 Assam Ajanta Kataky Dy. Dir, HE- Assam

2 West Bengal Shri. Prabir Kumar Das Member Secretary, SHEC

3 Mizoram Dr.K.L. Pradhan

Member Secretary. SHEC,

Mizoram

4 Meghalya Mr. Chinmay Gotmare Director Meghalaya

5 Daman Due Bheemasenachar Jayacharya Koppar

6 Puducherry Dr. Yasam Lakshmi Narayana Reddy

State Project Director (PSHEC),

Additional Secretary cum Director

of Higher & Technical Education,

7 Puducherry Dr.S.Mohandoss Member Secretary, SHEC

8 Tamil Nadu Dr. Amutha Pandian Nodal Officer, RUSA

9 Uttarakhand Dr. Satpal Saini Nodal Officer, RUSA

10 Jharkhand Shri Balendyu Bhushan Annandmurti Director H & T Education, RUSA

11 Jharkhand Dr. S.D. Singh SHEC drafting committee

12 Nagaland Shri. Deo Nukhu Parliamentary Secretary,

13 Nagaland Shri. Imjung M Panger (IAS) Secretary,

14 Himachal Pradesh Dr. Amar Dev Member Secretary (SHEC)

15 Himachal Pradesh Prof. Gopal Krishnan Nodal Officer (RUSA)

16 Goa Shri Bhaskar Nayak

Director (HE) & Nodal Officer

(RUSA)

17 Odisha Sri G.V.V. Sarma,IAS

Principal Secretary, Higher

Education Dept.

18 Odisha Prof. Deepak Kumar Behera,

Vice-Chancellor, Berhampur

University(Member of OSHEC,

19 Odisha Dr. Nawaz Hassan,

Principal, B.J.B.(Auto.) College,

Bhubaneswar

20 Gujarat Dr. A.U. Patel Advisor, KCG

21 Chandigarh Prof. Rajiv Loachan Director IQAC & RUSA

22 Chandigarh Dr Dalip Kumar Rusa Coordinator

23 Chandigarh Ms Manjit Brar State Nodal Officer

24 Telangana T Papi Reddy Chairman

25 Telangana Venkata Chalam Vice Chairman

26 Telangana Smt Vani Prasad Commissioner IAS

27 Telangana Dr. K Padmavathi Special Officer CCE

28 Telangana K. Srinivas Project Officer

29 Telangana B. Kanakachary Academic Guidance Officer

30 Lucknow Alok Kumar

Dy. Director and Nodal Officer -

RUSA

31 New Delhi (MHRD) Julie Consultant/ (RUSA - MHRD)

32 New Delhi (MHRD) Dr. B.Venkatesh Kumar,



TISS

33 New Delhi (MHRD) Shambhavi

34 New Delhi (MHRD) Divya

35 Maharashtra Dr. Jaya Goyal (tentative)

Senior Consultant, State Project

Directorate, RUSA Maharashtra

36 Andhra Pradesh Prof. P Vijaya Prakash Vice Chairman

37 Andhra Pradesh Mrs. Pronoti S Kavori Project Team Lead, RUSA

38 Rajatshthan Dr. Renu JD (RUSA) SHEC

39 Tamil Nadu Dr. N.Anitha RO (TANSCHE)

Annexure X

Schedule of Workshop



Day 1: Wednesday, 23 March 2016


2:30 to 2:45 p.m. Registration

2:45 to 3:00 p.m.




Leadership Academy,


3:00 to 3:20 a.m

Welcome and Opening Remarks S Ranganath

Vice Chairman

Karnataka State Council for Higher

Education

03.20 to 05.00 p.m.

Open Forum & Experience sharing Participating States

05.00 to 05.20 p.m. Summing up of days proceedings Dr. B.Venkatesh Kumar,


Leadership Academy,


Ms Ishita Roy

Joint Secretary (Higher Education)

National Mission Director

Ministry of Human Resource

Development

Government of India

5:20 to 5:30 p.m. Concluding remarks Bharat Lal Meena

Additional Chief Secretary

Higher Education

Karnataka

Day 2: Thursday, 24 March 2016


9:30 to 10.00 a.m. Welcome remarks Ms Ishita Roy




Development

Government of India

10.00 to 12.00 p.m.

Open Forum & Experience sharing Participating States

12.00 to 12.30 p.m. Summing up of days proceedings Dr. B.Venkatesh Kumar,


Leadership Academy,


Ms Ishita Roy




Development

Government of India

12:30 to 12:45 p.m Concluding Remarks Bharat Lal Meena

Additional Chief Secretary

Higher Education

Karnataka

Annexure XI



Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th April, 2016

SN. State Name Designation Institution

1 Bihar Professor Ranjit Verma Pro. Vice Chancellor Patna University

2 Bihar Dr. S.M Karim Pro. Vice Chancellor AKU

3 Bihar Dr. Shivesh Ranjan State Programme Officer SHEC

4 Bihar Prof Sardar Arvind Singh Principal RNAR College LMNU

5 Bihar Prof Tapan Kumar Sandilya Principal TPS College MU

6 Bihar Shri Surendra Prasad Principal RDS College

7 Bihar Mr. Ejaz Hashmi Dy. Director

Department of Education

GOB

8 Bihar Mr. Pankaj Bhushan RDS College BRABU

9 Uttrakhand Dr. V.K. Jain Vice Chancellor Doon University

10 Uttrakhand Dr. H.S. Dhami Vice Chancellor Kumaun University

11 Uttrakhand Sh. S. Ramaswamy Additional Chief Secretary Uttarakhand Government

12 Uttrakhand Dr. Harshwanti Bisht Principal,

Govt. P.G. College

Doiwala

13 Uttrakhand Dr. D.C. Nainwal Principal (Incharge)

Govt. Autonomus P.G.

College Rishikesh

14 Uttrakhand Dr. M.C. Pandey

Associate Professor

(attached with Directorate

of Higher Education ) Govt. College, Rudrapur

15 Uttrakhand Prof. R.C. Mishra Registrar

Uttarakhand Open

University

16 Uttrakhand Dr. V.N. Sharma Assistant Director

Higher Education ,

Directorate

17 Uttrakhand Dr. Satpal Singh Sahni Nodal Officer RUSA RUSA Project Directorate

18 Uttrakhand Dr. A.K. Tiwari

Associate Professor

(attached with RUSA

Project Directorate )

Govt. P.G. College

Dakpathar

19 Goa Dr. D. B. Arolkar Principal

D.M’s College of Arts

Science and Commerce

Mapusa

20 Goa Dr. A. Satish Principal

Narayan Zantye College

of Commerce Bicholim.

21 Goa Dr. Preeta Mallya Principal

Shree Damodar College of

Commerce and Economics

Margao – Goa.

22 Goa Dr. Radhika Nayak Principal

S.S.Dempo College of

Commerce & Economics

Altinho Panaji,Goa

403726

23 Goa Dr. Nandkumar N. Sawant Principal

Parvatibai Chowgule

College of Arts and

Science Margao.

24 Goa Dr. R. B. Patil Principal

Murgaon Education

Society’s College of Arts

& Commerce

Zuarinagar,Goa-403726

25 Goa Dr. Gervasio Mendes Acting Principal

Government College of

Arts and Commerce

Pernem.

26 Goa Dr. Renji GeorgeAmballoo Head

Department of Economics


Arts Science and

Commerce. Quepem.

27 Goa Dr. Joydeep Bhattacharjee Acting Principal


Arts Science and

Commerce Sanquelim.

28 Goa Dr. F. M. Nadaf Principal

Shree Mallikarjun College

of Arts & Commerce

Canacona.

29 Goa Sr. Aradhana Principal

Carmel College of Arts

Science and Commerce

for Women Nuvem.

30 Goa Dr. Remy Dias Dy. Director

Directorate of Higher

Education Porvorim -

Goa.

31 Goa Dr. Vinayak N. Sheth Principal Goaengcollege

32 Goa Dr.GopdeKrishnarao Principal Goa College of pharmacy

33

Dadra Nagar

Haveli Dr.Sony Amrendra Nodal officer

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Govt. College

34

Dadra Nagar

Haveli Ms. Sandhya Co-ordinator

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Govt. College

35

Dadra Nagar

Haveli Dr. Chirantan Rawal Assistant Prof.

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Govt. College

36

Dadra Nagar

Haveli Dr. Gaurang Barot Assistant Prof.

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Govt. College

37

Dadra Nagar

Haveli Dr. Suresh Chavda Assistant Prof.

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Govt. College

38

Dadra Nagar

Haveli Mrs. Aparna J. Tailor Assistant Prof.

Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam

Govt. College

39 Gujarat Dr. M.N. Patel Vice Chancellor Gujarat University

40 Gujarat Dr. Parimal Vyas Vice Chancellor MS University of Baroda

41 Gujarat Mr. Nikunj Jani Under Secretary Education Department

42 Gujarat Dr. S.U.Vora Principal

M.P Shah Arts &

Commerce College

Surendranagar

43 Gujarat Dr. M.G.Bhatt Principal

Shri.K.K. Shastri

Government Commerce

College

44 Gujarat Dr. A.S.Rathod Principal

Gujarat Arts & Science

College

45 Gujarat Dr.R.P.Bhatt Principal

BhahuddinScience

College Junagadh

46 Gujarat Mr. K.M.Joshi Principal M.N.College,Visnager

47 Sikkim Ms. Bina Pradhan Principal-In-Charge

Namchi Govt College,

Kamrang

48 Sikkim Mrs. Sujata Basnet Principal-In-Charge

Government College,

Rhenock

49 Sikkim Mrs. Suchismita Datta Principal-In-Charge

Sikkim Government

College, Burtuk

50 Sikkim Mr.Ganeshjitiwari Principal-In-Charge

Sikkim Government Law

College, Gangtok

51 Sikkim Mr. Y. P. Nepal Principal In-Charge

Govt. Sanskrit

Mahavidyalaya, Samdong

52 Sikkim Mr. Rabindrachettri Principal In-Charge

Sikkim Government

College, Gyalshing

53 Sikkim Mr. Khenpo L. Tshering Principal

Sikkim Institute of Higher

Nyingma Studies (Shins),

Pangthang

54 Sikkim Mr. D. Purohit  Vice-Principal

Sikkim Government

College, Tadong

55 Sikkim Mr. Satyadeep Chettri  Assistant Professor

Sikkim Government

College, Tadong

56 Sikkim  Mr. Dinesh Sharma Under Secretary

Sikkim Government

College, Tadong

57 Sikkim Mr. Khumukcham Labango Assistant Professor

Sikkim Government B.Ed.

College, Soreng

Annexure XII

Schedule of Forum


Mumbai, Maharashtra, 11th and 12th April, 2016

Day 1: Monday, 11 April 2016



09:15 to 09:30 a.m.



Professor & Course Director, Chair, Higher



09:30 to 9:40 a.m.

Welcome and Opening Remarks Dr. David Finegold, Distinguished Professor,

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,

Chief Academic Officer, American Honors,

President-Elect, Chatham University

09.45 to 10.15 a.m.

Inaugural Address

Dr. D.P. Singh, Director, National Assessment

and Accreditation Council

10.15 to 10.30 a.m. Break

10:30 to 12:00 noon Discussion and Working Groups:

Diversity in Admissions and Higher

Education

Dr. S. Parasuraman, Director, TISS

Courtney McAnuff, Vice President,

Enrollment Management, Rutgers, The State

University of New Jersey

12:00 to 01.30 p.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Marketing and Fund raising in Higher

Education

Dr. Sanjay Deshmukh,

Vice Chancellor, University of Mumbai

Laura Stanik, Associate Vice President,

Foundation and Alumni Communications,

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey



Community Colleges and

Vocationalization of Higher Education

Dr. Suhas Pednekar

Principal, Ruia Colleges, Mumbai

Heather McKay, Director, Education and

Employment Research Center, Rutgers, The

State University of New Jersey

4:00 to 4:30 p.m - Tea Break

04:30 to 05.30 p.m. Distinguished Scholar Lecture:

Changes in the Global Market for

Higher Education

Dr. David Finegold, Distinguished Professor,

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey,

Chief Academic Officer, American Honors,

President-Elect, Chatham University

07.30-9:30 p.m. Dinner in Boundry Hall, MCA

Day 2: Tuesday, 12 April 2016


9:30 to 10.45 a.m. Discussion and Working Groups:

Strategic Planning & Needs


and State Higher Education Plans


Professor & Course Director, Chair, Higher

Education Leadership Academy, Tata Institute

of Social Sciences

Dr. Sharon Ravitch, Senior Lecturer,

Graduate School of Education, University of

Pennsylvania

10:45 to 11:00 a.m. - Tea Break

11:00 to 12:30 p.m. Achieving Institutional Excellence Dr. M.S. Ananth, Former Director,

(IIT, Madras) &

Visiting Professor IIT, Mumbai

12:30 to 1:30 p.m. - Lunch Break

1:30 to 2.30 p.m. Distinguished Forum Lecture

"Governance, Autonomy and

Accountability in Higher Education in

India"

Dr. N.R. Madhava Menon

Former Director,

National Law School, Bangalore

2:30 to 3:30 p.m. Working Session – Action Plan and

Way Forward



Dr. B. Venkatesh Kumar, Professor

& Course Director, Chair, Higher Education

Leadership Academy,


Dr. Hal Salzman, Professor and Senior

Faculty Fellow, Rutgers, The State University

of New Jersey

03.30 to 04.00 p.m. Closing Remarks:


Dr. B. Venkatesh Kumar, Professor

and Course Director, Chair, Higher Education

Leadership Academy,


Annexure XIII

List of Participats


Mumbai, Maharashtra, 12th and 13th November, 2016

SN State Name Designation Institution

1 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. N. Francis

Xavier

Principal Jawaharlal Nehru Rajkeeya

Mahavidyalaya (JNRM)

2 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. Utpal Sharma Principal Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of

Technology

(DBRAIT)

3 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. J.D. Singh Principal Tagore Government College of

Education (TGCE)

4 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. R. Dev Das Principal Andaman College (ANCOL)

5 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Mrs.Pearl Devdas Associate Professor Jawaharlal Nehru Rajkeeya

Mahavidyalaya (JNRM)

6 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. B. Prabhuram HOD (Coop.

Management)

Mahatma Gandhi Government

College, Mayabunder

7 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. V.

Alagusundaram

HOD (Humanities) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of

Technology

(DBRAIT)

8 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Mr. Arun Srivastava HOD (Electrical) Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Institute of

Technology

(DBRAIT)

9 Andaman &

Nicobar Islands

Dr. Sushim Kumar

Biswas

HOD (Economics) Andaman College (ANCOL)

10 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Pankaj Lalit Registrar H.P.U. Himachal Pradesh University

11 Himachal

Pradesh

Prof. M.S Chauhan Dean Planning, H.P.U)

12 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Uma Verma Principal Govt. College, SUNNI

13 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr.Vasundhra Rajan Principal GC Jukhala

14 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Ashith Kumar

Mishra

Principal Govt. College Dehri

15 Chandigarh Shri Arjun Dev Deputy Director(

Adm.) ,

O/O Director Higher Education,

Chandigarh Administration

16 Chandigarh Dr. Dalip Kumar Additional State

Project Director

(RUSA)

UT, Chandigarh

17 Chandigarh Ms. Manjit Brar Principal GCC&BA-50,Chandigarh

18 Chandigarh Prof. Anita Kaushal Principal, PG PG GCG-11,Chandigarh

19 Punjab Prof. Karamjeet

Singh Kahlon

Dean Guru Nanak Dev University,

Amritsar

20 Punjab Prof. R.K Mahajan Dean College Development Council, Guru

Nanak Dev University, Amritsar

21 Punjab Dr. Bikar Singh Principal Govt College, Naya Nangal

22 Punjab Dr. Dharam Singh Principal SCD Govt College for Boys

Ludhiana

23 West Bengal Prof. Basab

Chaudhuri

Vice Chancellor, West

Bengal State

University

West Bengal State University

24 West Bengal Prof. Swagata Sen Pro-Vice-Chancellor Calcutta University

25 West Bengal Prof. Suchandra

Chakraborty

Teacer-in-charge Bhawanipur Education Society

26 West Bengal Dr. Swapan Kumar

Pan

Principal Guskara College

27 West Bengal Prof. Indramohan

Mandal

Principal Sree Chaitanya College

Annexure XIV

Schedule of Forum



Day 1: Saturday, 12 November 2016

Time Topic Experts

9:30 a.m. to 10.00 a.m. Registration

10.00 a.m. to 10:15 a.m.

RUSA and System Change:

Setting the Stage


Course Director


10.15 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. Welcome Address

Inaugural Address

Keynote Address

Multiple Pathways for Universities to

Support High-Quality Faculty Research

Dr. S. Parasuraman, Director,


Ms. Ishita Roy, IAS


(UGC, HE Policy, HE-CDN);

Scholarships

Dr. Pam Grossman

Dean, Graduate School of Education,


11:00 p.m. to 11:15 a.m. - Tea Break

11:15 a.m. to 12:30p.m.

15-20 minutes each speaker

followed by group work

Strategic Planning & Needs Assessment:

Preparing Institutional and State Higher

Education Plans


Course Director,


&

Dr. Sharon Ravitch,


of Pennsylvania

12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m - Lunch Break

01:30 noon to 3:00 p.m.



Developing Communities of Practice as a

Strategy for System

Improvement

Profs. Matt Hartley and Alan Ruby



3:00 p.m. to 3:15 p.m. - Tea Break

3:15p.m. to 4:45 p.m.



Creating Ecosystems for Academic

Excellence

Pursuing World Class Universities:

Lessons from 2 Green Field Sites

Dr. G. D. Yadav

Vice Chancellor, ICT, Mumbai

Prof. Alan Ruby

Senior Fellow,Penn AHEAD

Higher Education Division



04:45 p.m to 5:30 p.m Reflection by Participants



Day 2: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Time Topic Experts

9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.



Managing Conflicts & Motivating People

Realizing Shared Values and Beliefs: The

Role of Effective Academic Leaders in

Reshaping Institutional Culture

Dr. Suranjan Das

Vice Chancellor, Jadavpur University

&

Dr. Matt Hartley

Associate Dean & Professor



11:00 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. - Tea Break

11:15 a.m. to 12:45 p.m.



Group Work Profs. Alan Ruby, Matt Hartley,

Sharon Ravitch



Dr. Suranjan Das

Vice Chancellor, Jadavpur University

&


Course Director,


1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. - Lunch Break

2:00 p.m. to 3.30 p.m. Open Forum – Action Plan and Way

Forward

Dr. Sharon Ravitch,



&


Course Director,


Annexure XV

List of Participats



Sl

no.


1 Mizoram Prof. K.L Pradhan . RUSA MIZORAM

2 Mizoram Dr.Zarzoliana Joint State Project

Director( RUSA)

RUSA MIZORAM

3 Mizoram Prof.Vanlalhruaii Principal & Member

SHEC

SHEC

4 Mizoram Prof.B.Zoliana Professor Government Zirtiri

Residential Science

College, Aizawl

6 Mizoram Dr. Malsawmliana Associate Professor Government T. Romana

College, Aizwal

7 Mizoram Dr.Lalthansangi Fanai Associate Professor Government Aizawl

College, Aizwal

8 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Amar Dev State Project Director RUSA HP

9 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. B.L Vinta Joint Director, Hr.

Education

RUSA HP

10 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Satish Sharma (Joint Director Hr.

Educadtion)

RUSA HP

11 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Gopal Krishan

Sanghaik

State Programmme

Officer

RUSA HP

12 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. J.S . Negi CEO H.P.University

13 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Krishan Vaidya Principal Govt. College Panarsa,

Mandi

14 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr. Amarjeet Principal Govt. College Khundain,

Kangra

15 Rajasthan Dr. S K Deo Principal SPR Govt. College, Ajmer

16 Rajasthan Dr. Anup Srivastava Principal RR Autonomous College,

Alwar

17 Rajasthan Dr. Umesh Chand

Sharma

Principal MSJ Govt. College,

Bharatpur

18 Rajasthan Dr. Bela Bhanot Principal Govt. Dungar College,

Bikaner

19 Rajasthan Dr. Reeta Gulati/Dr

Pratima

Shrivastava,HOD Dept.

of Botony-RUSA Co-

ord.

Principal JDB Govt. College, Kota

20 Rajasthan Dr. Anshu Dandia Nodal Officer University of Rajasthan,

Jaipur

21 Rajasthan Dr. Urmil Talwar State Project Directorate

22 Rajasthan Dr. Neelam Upadhyaya State Project Directorate

23 Jharkhand Dr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Director, Technical

Education & State

Project Directorate,

Department of Higher,

Technical Education &

Skill, Govt. Of Jhakhand

24 Jharkhand Dr R.P.P.Singh Vice Chancellor Kolhan

University

Kolhan

University,chaibasa,West

Singbhum.

25 Jharkhand Dr M.P.Sinha Pro VC Vinoba Bhave University

26 Jharkhand Dr Amar Kumar Singh - Registrar Nilambar Pitamber

University

27 Jharkhand Dr U.C.Mehta - Principal Ranchi College

Autonomous College

28 Jharkhand Dr Sujit Soren - CCDC Sido Kanho Murmu

University

29 Jharkhand Dr Shambhu Dayal Singh

-

Deputy Director RUSA, Jharkhand

30 Bihar Dr. Arvind Singh Principal, r RANR College, Samastipu

31 Bihar Dr. T.K.Shandilya Principal, TPS College, Patna

32 Bihar Dr. S.P.Shahi Principal, AN College, Patna

33 Bihar Mr. Pankaj Bhushan RDS College,

Muzzafarnagar

34 Bihar Dr. P.K. Choudhary Consultant, SHEC, Patna

35 Bihar Dr. Shivesh Ranjan SPO, SHEC, Patna

36 Bihar Dr. Ejaz Alam HoD, Dept of Eng., MMHA&P

Univ., Patna

37 Tamilnadu Mr.Jawahar, Registrar, University of

Madras,Chennai.

38 Tamilnadu Dr.B.Vanitha, IQAC Co-ordinator, Bharathiyar University,

39 Tamilnadu Dr.E.Selvarajan, Professor of Economics, Member Secretary RUSA,

Annamalai University

40 Tamilnadu Anna Rangini Controller of

Examination

Government Arts &

Science College,

Vyasarpadi, Chennai.

41 Tamilnadu Dr.Maria Preethi

Srinivasan,

Research Officer TANSCHE

42 Tamilnadu Dr.M.Senthil S.O. (P&D) Alagappa

University,Karaikudi.

Annexure XVI

Schedule of Forum



Day 1: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Time Topic Experts

8:45 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Registration

9:00 a.m. to 9:15 a.m.

Setting the Stage and Inaugural Address


Course Director


9:15 a.m. to 09:45 a.m. Keynote Address

Multiple Pathways for Universities to

Support High-Quality Faculty Research

Dr. Pam Grossman

Dean, Graduate School of Education,


09.45 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. - Tea Break

10:15 a.m. to 11:30a.m.



Strategic Planning & Needs Assessment:

Preparing Institutional and State Higher

Education Plans


Course Director


&

Dr. Sharon Ravitch,


of Pennsylvania

11:30 a.m. to 1:15 p.m.



Enhancing the Academic Performance of

Institutions: Innovation and Excellence in

Research and Teaching

Promoting Academic Innovation and

Faculty and Staff Empowerment

Dr. M.S. Anant,

Former Director,

(IIT, Madras) &


Mumbai

Dr. Matt Hartley




01:15 p.m to 02:15 p.m - Lunch Break

02:15 p.m to 3:45 p.m

15 -20 minutes presentation

by each of the speakers,

followed by interaction and

group work

University Governance and Innovative

ways of promoting excellence: Lessons

of an administrator

Pursuing World Class Universities:

Lessons from 2 Green Field sites

Dr. Vijay Khole

Former Vice-Chancellor


Prof. Alan Ruby,

Senior Fellow

Penn AHEAD.

Higher Education Division



03:45 p.m to 04:00p.m - Tea/ Coffee Break

04:00 p.m to 5:00 p.m Group Work



Day 2: Wednesday, November 16, 2016


9:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.



Developing Communities of Practice as a

Strategy for System

Improvement

Profs. Matt Hartley and Alan Ruby



11:00 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. - Tea/Coffee Break

11:15 a.m. to 12:45p.m.



Creating Ecosystems for Academic

Excellence

Realizing Shared Values and Beliefs: The

Role of Effective Academic Leaders in

Reshaping Institutional Culture

Dr. Abhay Pethe

Professor,

Dr. Vibhooti Shukla Chair Unit in

Urban Economics and Regional

Development


&

Dr. Matt Hartley




1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. - Lunch Break

2:00 p.m. to 3.30 p.m. Open Forum – Action Plan and Way

Forward

Dr. Sharon Ravitch



&


Course Director,


One day Workshop on "Managing RUSA Fund, Reform Tracker and Web Portal"


Date: 18th February, 2017

S.

No

State / UT Details of Participants

1 Manipur Smt. Anna Arambam, OSD/RUSA, Manipur

2 Manipur Mr. Leishangthem Lokendro Singh, Consultant/RUSA, Manipur

3 Dadra and

Nagar Haveli

Dr. Sony Amrendra, State Nodal Officer

4 Dadra and

Nagar Haveli

Ms. Sandhya, Institutional Co-ordinator

5 Uttarakhand Dr. Satpal Singh Sahni, Joint Project Director, RUSA

6 Uttarakhand Dr. Vipin Kumar Saini,Nodal Officer, RUSA, Doon University,

Dehradun

7 Uttarakhand Mr. Vikas Rawat, Computer Operator,RUSA Project Director.

8 West Bengal Mr. Kunal Kanti Jha, Controller of Finance,

9 West Bengal Mr. K. K. Mukherjee

10 West Bengal Mr. Koushik Das, Asst Professor, Raja N. L. Khan Women's College

11 Meghalaya Mr. Rangksan Mawroh, Principal Consultant

12 Meghalaya Mr. Arkirang Swer, Financial Consultant

13 Meghalaya Mr. Ronner First Son Sawkmie, ,MIS Consultant

14 Bihar Mr. Pankaj Bhushan, Member SLQAC Bihar, R.D.S.College,

Muzaffarpur.

15 Maharashtra CA Dr. Vidya Gargote, SPPU, Pune

16 Maharashtra Mr. Sanjay Ghogale, Asst. Accounts officer

17 Maharashtra Mr. Shakti Singh Chauhan- Consultant

Date: 20th February, 2017

S.

No


1 Pondicherry Mr. Arun L.Desai, Secretary to Govt.(Education), Govt. of Puducherry

2 Gujarat Mr. Mehul Sharma

3 Chandigarh Dr. Dalip Kumar, Additional State Project Director (RUSA)

4 Chandigarh Mr. Ashwani Dogra, Deputy Controller (F&A), Department of Education,

Chandigarh Administration

5 Chandigarh Mr. Vijay KUMAR Vij, Assistant Controller (F&A), Department of Education,

Chandigarh Administration.

6 Chandigarh Mr. Puneet Modgil, Project Officer, RUSA, UT, Chandigarh.

7 Sikkim Mr. Upesh Chettri

8 Sikkim Mr. Tarik Anowar Islam

9 Kerala Prof. Christy Clement, Nodal Officer

10 Kerala Ms. Lakshmi L. Finance Officer, RUSA

11 Kerala Mr. Ajith Kumar G. , Officer, RUSA

12 Kerala Mr. Deepu Bhaskar, RUSA Officer, SPD

13 Karnataka Prof. Lingaraj Gandhi,RUSA Nodal Officer, University of Mysore, Mysore

14 Odisha Mrs Dibarani Dora, Finance Officer,Odisha State H.E. Council( 09437552718)

15 Odisha Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra,Consultant (0889573592)

16 Odisha Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra,Consultant()

17 Jharkhand Ms. Jyoti Pushpa : 8986805862

18 Jharkhand Ms. Meetu Bharti : 8002488572

19 Assam Mr. Miftahur A Ahmed (System Analyst)

20 Assam Ms Nomita Baruah (Project Planning Officer)

21 Assam Ms. Angana Das, Accountant

22 Delhi

GNCT

Mr. R.P. Meena, A.O. Adrmin

23 Delhi

GNCT

Mr. Man Mohan, A.P. (IT)

24 Pondicherry Dr.P.Sivaradje, Dean, Pondicherry Engineering College, Puducherry

25 Pondicherry Dr. P.Annadurai

26 Assam Dr.Santanu Baishya (TSG Member)

27 Gujarat Dr. Pravin Patel

28 Gujarat Dr. Yogesh Yadav


Date: 22nd February, 2017

mailto:[email protected]


S.

No


1 Mizoram Mr. Laltanpuia, Principal, Govt. Zirtiri Residential Science College, Contact

No.

2 Mizoram Mr. Michael Vanlalzawna, PS to MS, SHEC

3 Mizoram Mr. Johsua Lalthakima, Asstt. Project Engineer, SPD RUSA contact Nos. email

id:

4 Arunachal

Pradesh

Mr, Minto Ete, Dy.SPD (RUSA)

Address: Directorate of Higher & Technical Education, Govt. of Arunachal

Pradesh, Itanagar-791111

5 Arunachal

Pradesh

Dr. A. I. Singh, OSD (RUSA)



6 Arunachal

Pradesh

Mr. Dakge Riba, Astt.-cum-DEO (RUSA)



7 Himachal

Pradesh

Dr Gopal Krishan Sanghaik, SPO RUSA

8 Madhya

Pradesh

Mrs. Jyoti Mishra, Sr. Consultant, Finance

9 Madhya

Pradesh

Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Consultant- IT

10 Haryana Mr. Harpal Singh (F.O. RUSA)

11 Haryana Ms. Nasima Salmani (Consultant RUSA)



12 Haryana Ms. Ritu Gill (Consultant RUSA)

13 Chhattisgarh Dr. K.N.Bapat, Principal, Govt.Nagarjuna P.G. Science Colleges, Raipur.

14 Chhattisgarh Dr. Arun Singh, Deputy Director, RUSA.

15 Chhattisgarh Mr.Nuteshwar Verma

16 Chhattisgarh Mr. Gomed Pathak, Data Entry Operator, CHIPS

17 Andaman and

Nicobar

Mr, Suneel K. Chakraborty (9933254021)

18 Punjab Ms. Harleen Kaur Bedi, APD, RUSA

19 Punjab Prof. Daljit Singh, GC Hoshiarpur

20 Punjab Mr. Bhagwant Jot Kaur, (RUSA Office)

21 Telangana Ms Mounica, Technical Support

22 Telangana Mr. Gajendra Babu, Lecturer, Academic Cell

23 Telangana Smt. Soundarya Joseph, Lecturer, Academic. Project officer, RUSA

24 Andhra

Pradesh

Mr.G. Tirupathi Rao, IT Consultant, TSG- RUSA, AP.

25 Andhra

Pradesh

Mr. Piyush Wankhade, Consultant, TSG- RUSA, AP.

26 Andhra

Pradesh

Prof. Siva Prathap, Assistant Professor and RUSA Nodal Officer, Yogi Vemana

University, Kadapa, AP.

27 Andhra

Pradesh

Mr. Srikanta natha Reddy, IFS, SPD- RUSA and JS to Government of Andhra

Pradesh, Higher Education.

28 Andhra

Pradesh

Mr. P. Anil kumar,DHE College Education

29 Jammu

Kashmir

Mr. Tariq Ahmed Zargar Mission Director RUSA.(j&k)

30 Jammu

Kashmir

Mr. Kulbushan KumarFA/CAO Deptt.of Hr. Education

31 Jammu

Kashmir

Er. Fiazan Iyzdi Purra, Programmer RUSA

32 Uttar Pradesh Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Govt. of Uttar

Pradesh

33 Uttar Pradesh Mr. Unmesh Mishra, Consultant- RUSA

34 Uttar Pradesh Dr. Alok K. Srivastava, Dy. Director

35 Tripura Mr.Abir Dasgupta, Consultant(RUSA),

36 Tripura Mr. Rajesh Bhattacharjee, Joint Director,Higher Education Deptt.,

37 Tamilnadu Mr. P.Sitharthan

38 Tamilnadu Mr. R.Muthu Krishnan

39 Tamilnadu Mr. Mrs Sathya Bama, Data Entry Operator

40 Goa Mr. Bhaskar Nayak. Director (HE) & Nodal officer (RUSA)

41 Goa Mr. Pravin Bhende

42 Goa Mr. V.V.Kamat

43 Goa Mr. Gervacio Mendes

44 Goa Mr. Govind Kelkar, System Analyst

45 Rajasthan Dr. Shruti Gupta, Asst. Project Director, RUSA

46 Rajasthan Mr Vimlesh Soni,Asst. Project Director, RUSA

47 Rajasthan Dr Ananta Mathur,Asst. Project Director, RUSA

48 Rajasthan Dr. Ashish Vyas, Nodal Officer, RUSA

49 MHRD Mr. Sanjiv Narayan, Under Secretary, MHRD

Date post:	05-Mar-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	lydieu
View:	235 times
Download:	6 times

RUSA Capacity Building and Leadership Management...

Documents